Champion for Democracy? - Woodrow Wilson I WHO DID WHAT IN WW1?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 тра 2024
  • Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States, is one of the most controversial characters of his era. His racial views, his view on peace and the post-war world, his decision to go to war with Germany in 1917 are still being debated to this day. We take a look at the life of Wilson to better understand his motivation.
    » HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR CHANNEL?
    You can support us by sharing our videos with your friends and spreading the word about our work.You can also support us financially on Patreon: / thegreatwar
    You can also buy our merchandise in our online shop: shop.spreadshirt.de/thegreatwar/
    Patreon is a platform for creators like us, that enables us to get monthly financial support from the community in exchange for cool perks.
    » WHERE CAN I GET MORE INFORMATION ABOUT WORLD WAR I AND WHERE ELSE CAN I FIND YOU?
    We’re offering background knowledge, news, a glimpse behind the scenes and much more on:
    reddit: bit.ly/TheGreatSubReddit
    Facebook: bit.ly/WW1FB
    Twitter: bit.ly/WW1Series
    Instagram: bit.ly/ZpMYPL
    » CAN I EMBED YOUR VIDEOS ON MY WEBSITE?
    Of course, you can embed our videos on your website. We are happy if you show our channel to your friends, fellow students, classmates, professors, teachers or neighbours. Or just share our videos on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit etc.
    We are also happy to get your feedback, criticism or ideas in the comments. If you have interesting historical questions, just post them and we will answer in our OUT OF THE TRENCHES videos. You can find a selection of answers to the most frequently asked questions here: bit.ly/OOtrenches
    » CAN I SHOW YOUR VIDEOS IN CLASS?
    Of course! Tell your teachers or professors about our channel and our videos. We’re happy if we can contribute with our videos. If you are a teacher and have questions about our show, you can get in contact with us on one of our social media presences.
    » WHAT ARE YOUR SOURCES?
    Videos: British Pathé
    Pictures: Mostly Picture Alliance
    Background Map: d-maps.com/carte.php?num_car=6...
    Literature (excerpt):
    Gilbert, Martin. The First World War. A Complete History, Holt Paperbacks, 2004.
    Hart, Peter. The Great War. A Combat History of the First World War, Oxford University Press, 2013.
    Hart, Peter. The Great War. 1914-1918, Profile Books, 2013.
    Stone, Norman. World War One. A Short History, Penguin, 2008.
    Keegan, John. The First World War, Vintage, 2000.
    Hastings, Max. Catastrophe 1914. Europe Goes To War, Knopf, 2013.
    Hirschfeld, Gerhard. Enzyklopädie Erster Weltkrieg, Schöningh Paderborn, 2004
    Michalka, Wolfgang. Der Erste Weltkrieg. Wirkung, Wahrnehmung, Analyse, Seehamer Verlag GmbH, 2000
    Leonhard, Jörn. Die Büchse der Pandora: Geschichte des Ersten Weltkrieges, C.H. Beck, 2014
    If you want to buy some of the books we use or recommend during our show, check out our Amazon Store: bit.ly/AmazonTGW
    NOTE: This store uses affiliate links which grant us a commission if you buy a product there.
    » WHAT IS “THE GREAT WAR” PROJECT?
    THE GREAT WAR covers the events exactly 100 years ago: The story of World War I in realtime. Featuring: The unique archive material of British Pathé. Indy Neidell takes you on a journey into the past to show you what really happened and how it all could spiral into more than four years of dire war. Subscribe to our channel and don’t miss our new episodes every Thursday.
    » WHO IS REPLYING TO MY COMMENTS? AND WHO IS BEHIND THIS PROJECT?
    Most of the comments are written by our social media manager Florian. He is posting links, facts and backstage material on our social media channels. But from time to time, Indy reads and answers comments with his personal account, too.
    The Team responsible for THE GREAT WAR is even bigger:
    - CREDITS -
    Presented by : Indiana Neidell
    Written by: Indiana Neidell
    Director: Toni Steller & Florian Wittig
    Director of Photography: Toni Steller
    Sound: Toni Steller
    Mixing, Mastering & Sound Design: www.above-zero.com
    Editing: Steven Roberts
    Motion Design: Philipp Appelt
    Research by: Indiana Neidell
    Fact checking: Markus Linke
    The Great War Theme composed by Karim Theilgaard: bit.ly/karimyt
    A Mediakraft Networks Original Channel
    Based on a concept by Spartacus Olsson
    Author: Indiana Neidell
    Visual Concept: Astrid Deinhard-Olsson & David van Stephold
    Executive Producer: Spartacus Olsson
    Producer: Toni Steller & Florian Wittig
    Social Media Manager: Florian Wittig
    Contains licenced Material by British Pathé
    All rights reserved - © Mediakraft Networks GmbH, 2017

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,3 тис.

  • @hankrearden20
    @hankrearden20 7 років тому +821

    "Please keep it civil." Famous last words.

  • @gillbates7648
    @gillbates7648 7 років тому +418

    2 things
    1. Its sad that Indy had to tell people to keep it civil.
    2. Does he expect it to stay civil. This is Modern War

    • @dndboy13
      @dndboy13 6 років тому +24

      users comment in the comments section.
      thousands of people die
      this is modern war

  • @MrMzr-er7kb
    @MrMzr-er7kb 7 років тому +348

    Props to the writer, and Indie, for observing the elephants in the room objectively.

    • @GhostofRazors
      @GhostofRazors 7 років тому +15

      Still more elephants and donkeys:
      No mention of the KKK revival and the screening of Rise of a nation in the white house?
      He also had a stroke in his second term and his wife took over.
      "She was, essentially, the nation’s chief executive until her husband’s second term concluded in March of 1921"-www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/woodrow-wilson-stroke/
      I am not saying the episode was very thorough (the education topic was good) but its still missing some major points.
      /constructive criticism.

    • @samlevitt1848
      @samlevitt1848 7 років тому +12

      Hey Indy, I enjoyed the video on Wilson, and I understand the constraints of the trying to make an entertaining piece of historical content while not overflowing with content. That being said, I think the larger criticisms that can be made of Wilson are 1. His removal and purging of African Americans from the federal government. 2. His delayed support and even hostility towards Woman's Suffrage in the United States. 3. The legislation that was passed to curb dissent in the United States during the war. I kind of expect that the last point will get coverage in the later episodes. As for the others, I am just going to leave a little discussion about Wilson and his interactions below.
      While there is a lot of literature about these issues, I think this PBS web page is a good start for looking at his treatment of African Americans in government during his reign in office. Culturally this also included naming army bases after rebel generals, (Fort Brag, Fort A.P. Hill,) and the treatment of African Americans in the Army and their mistreatment after the war. www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/stories_events_segregation.html
      memory.loc.gov/ammem/aaohtml/exhibit/aopart7.html
      books.google.com/books?id=IQN9Xk0p62MC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
      As for suffrage, it was not until his reelection campaign that Wilson began to come out in stronger favor for Woman's Suffrage, and only in 1918 that he backed the 18th Amendment. Importantly though, it was the suffrage movement itself that was the largest factor in gaining women the right to vote. For further referece, the book, One Woman, One Vote, a collection of essays on the Suffrage and early Woman's Rights movement and its many facets and divisions is worth a read.
      By chance, is there a plan to talk about the racial make up of the American army and the segregation and divisions that occurred as the U.S. Army mobilized? Again, thank you for your great work on the show, and keep it up!

    • @washizukanorico
      @washizukanorico 5 років тому

      I really appreciate your channel, is there an episode on Pétain? How hard that episode must be to write keeping it about ww1...
      About Wilson and the segregation in US army I read somewhere US did not plan to use African American battalion as a fighting force but the French army that got command of some of them felt very comfortable sending them to death as every one else. Is that true or a French legend?

    • @theroachden6195
      @theroachden6195 3 роки тому

      Indy did well, but Wilson loved himself and was a massive racist piece of s***.

  • @Bertisevil666
    @Bertisevil666 7 років тому +178

    He caused more long term problems than he solved.
    This became a popular trend among presidents which endures to this day.

    • @stuartholden6163
      @stuartholden6163 3 роки тому +11

      Definitely

    • @Boretheory
      @Boretheory Рік тому +4

      “We’ve boosted the economy threw war in Iraq!” … “ and now our allies and neutral partners hate us which is even worse :D”

    • @victorsamuelson3589
      @victorsamuelson3589 Рік тому

      Don’t worry about our allies look at their horrible countries ours is the best 10 times better than this that’s why everyone wants to come here stupid

  • @davidhoran7116
    @davidhoran7116 5 років тому +21

    “New Jersey, at that time, was very corrupt” as a jersey resident, can confirm, not much has changed.

  • @igetboredeasily224
    @igetboredeasily224 7 років тому +71

    I'll shout this from the rooftops - you guys do an incredible job of presenting the facts in a clear, unbiased way, whilst providing a clear story for us all to understand and enjoy. I'm consistently impressed week on week - keep up the good work!

  • @VersusARCH
    @VersusARCH 7 років тому +415

    The importance of each and every US (and not just US) president is grossly overblown. Every policy is a product of an entire complex system of a government with countless experts and financial moguls, NOT a single man (even in so called dictatorships). Yet by personifying governments through their heads, not just common people but often histories too, leave a false impressions that it is so.

    • @tylerhayward8042
      @tylerhayward8042 7 років тому +25

      Well said!

    • @imperatorcaesardivifiliusa2158
      @imperatorcaesardivifiliusa2158 7 років тому +40

      After all, no man rules alone.

    • @bmazin1377
      @bmazin1377 7 років тому +3

      VersusARCH that's true but we shouldn't diminish the policies or legislature they personally created even though congress played a role in passing it

    • @eccentricthinker142
      @eccentricthinker142 7 років тому +2

      But if the bills were so disagreeable to the legislature that they could not pass, then the heads of state would need to remain, a product of their times

    • @UpcycleElectronics
      @UpcycleElectronics 7 років тому +1

      Ultimate responsibility for, versus direct administrative execution, is a blurry line that gains a life of its own with time.

  • @konstantindimitrov7
    @konstantindimitrov7 4 роки тому +33

    Here in Bulgaria Wilson is greatly respected and viewed on as the only leader of victorious nation in WWI that remained honest and noble. He has the fame of the only friend Bulgaria had at Neuilly. Currently (2020) there is a strong campaign for naming a street after Woodrow Wilson here in Sofia.

    • @bikinisforever4163
      @bikinisforever4163 8 місяців тому

      He campaigned to keep the US out of war, then, once he won, forgot about his promises and brought us in, despite us not being provoked. Why would you celebrate that? 100k US troops lost their lives because of him.

    • @redjirachi1
      @redjirachi1 6 місяців тому +2

      Always interesting to see a world leader have more of a fanbase from a foreign country

  • @overheardatthepub1238
    @overheardatthepub1238 7 років тому +82

    I really appreciate you defining what "progressivism" meant back then. Defining how terms used today meant back in the day is incredibly important in understanding history. Also, the perspective of how history repeats itself (including how people during the Great War say NEVER HAVE I EVER when it's completely incorrect!) is epic. This kind of completeness is why this channel is important, and not just entertaining.

    • @bikinisforever4163
      @bikinisforever4163 8 місяців тому

      Liberals of 100 years ago hated Communism. Liberals of today love Communism. Liberals of 100 years ago would absolutely hate the left today. Open borders, high taxes, high crime, who in their right mind would support any of those things?

  • @ethanreighley1336
    @ethanreighley1336 7 років тому +57

    You should do Teddy Roosevelt. You forget that presidents don't just stop existing when their term is up. Amassed a volunteer force to go to France in 1917.....Wilson said no :(

    • @josephmoore4764
      @josephmoore4764 3 роки тому +6

      He was a politcal rival. Wilson wasn't going to just let him get the free PR

    • @ethanreighley1336
      @ethanreighley1336 3 роки тому +3

      @@josephmoore4764 Have you ever heard of the cynical historian UA-cam channel. He has a 2 part video on Wilson. He's probably the worst president in America's history.

  • @woodchuck003
    @woodchuck003 7 років тому +76

    Wilson did believe that Birth of a Nation was so historically accurate that he put his name on it.

    • @Archon3960
      @Archon3960 4 роки тому +5

      Yeah, possibly the worst move he ever made... :/

    • @bensmall7070
      @bensmall7070 2 роки тому +7

      Actually he later called the movie mistake and regretted having anything to do with it. Still kinda stupid move from his side.

    • @robertortiz-wilson1588
      @robertortiz-wilson1588 Рік тому +1

      ​@@bensmall7070 I forgot, what year did he say that?

  • @asendimchev1996
    @asendimchev1996 7 років тому +138

    I swear that Woodrow Wilson is some alter-ego of HP Lovecraft.

    • @SuperCrazf
      @SuperCrazf 7 років тому +15

      A. Dimchev thanks, now I can't unsee him XD

    • @sharkfinbite
      @sharkfinbite 7 років тому +36

      New conspiracy theory. Wilson found the fountain of youth and used it on himself to take back years of his aging. Then he faked his death in 1924 and created an alter ego named H. P. Lovecraft. This way he can live his dream of being a horror/scifi writer. Sadly the fountain of youth didn't protect him from cancer and he died from cancer on his intestine. haha

    • @zancospancos
      @zancospancos 7 років тому +1

      lol

    • @BigBoss-sm9xj
      @BigBoss-sm9xj 7 років тому

      Nice

    • @USMValor-jc5xu
      @USMValor-jc5xu 5 років тому

      He does look a lot like him.

  • @gcircle
    @gcircle 7 років тому +24

    "Please keep it civil."
    This channel's regulars are mostly civil, but this is the internet. That is a dangerous request XD

  • @The51stDivision
    @The51stDivision 7 років тому +134

    "No campaign in the history of this country has been so marked by viciousness, bitterness, and invective."
    ...lol I beg your pardon.

    • @wesleytoups1161
      @wesleytoups1161 3 роки тому +13

      and bested yet again!!!

    • @mmjahink
      @mmjahink 3 роки тому +8

      @@wesleytoups1161 And there's no reason to think 2024 won't be worse

    • @justinh6651
      @justinh6651 2 роки тому +3

      2020 was worse

    • @whatclub3934
      @whatclub3934 2 роки тому

      You aint seen nothin yet son!!
      I’m scared of 2024

  • @arthur131313
    @arthur131313 7 років тому +79

    History has continued to more and more look down on him.

    •  7 років тому +3

      +Edward Longshanks Of England, Duke of Aquatine
      It always has been. Hegemonic periods are relatively peaceful globally, and the country that has the hegemony is doing quite well.
      The Dutch hegemony allowed them to break the stranglehold that catholicism had on Europe. This in turn started (glorious revolution) the British two cycles of hegemony during which slavery disappeared from most of the globe. That could never have happened if the British Royal Navy hadn't been so powerful as to establish a hegemony, which allowed Britain to attack slavers wherever they were found.
      A weaker non-hegemonic country would've been threatened into tolerating the slavers by their respective governments declaring freeing slaves to be an act of war.

    • @XXGDUBSXX
      @XXGDUBSXX 7 років тому +1

      Who is History?

    • @arthur131313
      @arthur131313 7 років тому +11

      Husband of Herstory

    • @TheRealUcanUwill
      @TheRealUcanUwill 3 роки тому +1

      @Billy Buckley is he really truth? He was anti antisemitism, and antisemitism was very conservative and popular in those times. I feel like his love for KKK is mostly made up by characters like Dinesh De Sousa, but I might be wrong.

    • @billybuckley684
      @billybuckley684 3 роки тому +8

      @@TheRealUcanUwill I think it's fair to say that Wilson was a terrible person, He was born in the south and helped boost the lost cause myth. He resegregated many agencies and parts of the federal government. Wilson himself fired 15 out of 17 black supervisors in the federal service and replaced them with white people. The head of the Internal Revenue division in Georgia fired all his black employees, saying, "There are no government positions for Negroes in the South. A Negro's place in the corn field." To enable hiring discrimination going forward, in 1914 the federal government began requiring photographs on job applications. It's worth stressing that Wilson's policies here were racist even for his time. Presidents Teddy Roosevelt and William Howard Taft had been much better about appointing black statesmen to public office, and other political figures, including whites, attacked Wilson's moves toward segregation. The influential pro-civil rights journalist Oswald Garrison Villard wrote that the Wilson administration "has allied itself with the forces of reaction, and put itself on the side of every torturer, of every oppressor, of every perpetrator of racial injustice in the South or the North." He further attacked it for its "political stupidity": The administration "has put into the hands of the Republican party an issue which, if they have the sense to use it, may be just the touchstone they are seeking."

  • @tjcassidy2694
    @tjcassidy2694 7 років тому +13

    @ 7:48 "The first Southerner to be president since 1848."
    Andrew Johnson (1865-69) was from Tennessee.

    • @s0undwavekiller558
      @s0undwavekiller558 4 роки тому +3

      We Tennesseans are always forgotten... Although its hard for one to forget such a terrible President.

    • @ZER0ZER0SE7EN
      @ZER0ZER0SE7EN 3 роки тому +3

      Right, Indy should have said first Southerner elected President since 1848.

  • @chuckwingo11
    @chuckwingo11 7 років тому +161

    Trying hard to be civil - Wilson was perhaps the first American President who didn’t believe in the American system of divided government and limited powers. Read his writings from the Princeton era and you’ll find more than faint hints of his belief in what was later call the “Fuerher Prinncip”, that the President should be, and act as, an elected monarch.
    I have to agree that some of his domestic policies were, for the era, proper; but his anti-free speech policies during the war, his overt racism (in the real, not modern meaning of the word) and especially his utter inability to understand that American government was structured to be collegial doomed his presidency to the lower ranks of American presidents.

    • @cpob2013
      @cpob2013 7 років тому +15

      in other words, the imperial presidency FDR crafted (out of necessity to be fair, but then so did Caesar) and has continued ever since

    • @MarekDohojda
      @MarekDohojda 7 років тому +13

      It is very much questionable if FDR had any necessity beyond protecting his failed economical ideology.

    • @jesseteixeira6284
      @jesseteixeira6284 7 років тому +9

      Failed? Care to back that up?

    • @MarekDohojda
      @MarekDohojda 7 років тому +23

      You mean 12 years of the Great Depression isn't proof enough? Let's see, double digit unemployment, reduction in salaries and purchasing power, slagging to no economical growth, etc...
      Not sure what you call failed, but I call worst economical period in US history as failed.
      And no don't come back with "it would have been worse" as that is a silly argument without any bases in logic or facts.

    • @icecoldmeat4046
      @icecoldmeat4046 6 років тому +18

      Marek Dohojda the Great Depression started under Hoover, that just a historical fact. The Great Depression happened because of Americans spending too much on their credit card basically.

  • @khalilmason
    @khalilmason 7 років тому +43

    "Woodrow Wilson did not live very long..." The best thing he ever did.

  • @damianamusic
    @damianamusic 7 років тому +12

    Indy, never commented on your videos before but it was such a cool fact to know that you went to Wesleyan as well!! I'm currently a student there now and I've shared your videos with other students interested in WW1 but now I can tell them you went here too!

    • @TheGreatWar
      @TheGreatWar  7 років тому +14

      +puffyhead1 we need an indy neidell shrine there

  • @blurr220
    @blurr220 7 років тому +30

    As a resident of NJ, I can safely say that things haven't changed much in terms of corruption here.

    • @kevinoneal9779
      @kevinoneal9779 7 років тому

      I mean, it's not *that* bad.

    • @InfinityWarriorInc
      @InfinityWarriorInc 7 років тому +2

      You're that old, huh? :P

    • @tiggergolah
      @tiggergolah 7 років тому +3

      No, Nicky, blurr220 and I have access to a form of time travel, whereby we can access the witness, thoughts, and ideas of those from the past.
      It's called "books."
      All the same, I'll judge his knowledge of NJ history, fleshed out by the local stories he's heard all his life, probably trump your glibness.

    • @InfinityWarriorInc
      @InfinityWarriorInc 7 років тому +1

      My comment was meant as a joke, tiggergolah.

    • @zoperxplex
      @zoperxplex 6 років тому

      You got that right!

  • @julianpolzin4404
    @julianpolzin4404 7 років тому +4

    The amount of respect with which you treat history is admirable. Thank you for your diverse coverage of highly complex topics and leaving space for interpretation when needed, which obviously shows respect to your viewers as well. This is the difference between education and propaganda: Trusting the recipients with the information given. Well done!

  • @Edax_Royeaux
    @Edax_Royeaux 7 років тому +11

    I saw in a documentary that when he suffered the debilitating stroke in office, the First Lady controlled access to Wilson, and effectively became the new president, due to the fact that the precedent of a President becoming incapacitated was not accounted for.

    • @CJ87317
      @CJ87317 7 років тому

      He wasn't as bad off as some seem to suggest. He did make a smattering of speeches after the stroke. Edith Wilson did serve as his gatekeeper though and he rarely left the White House.

    • @rohiths3554
      @rohiths3554 2 роки тому

      What did she do

  • @jhoward8780
    @jhoward8780 7 років тому +5

    In the case of the segregated army, I seem to remember reading that Pershing didn't have anything against desegregating the army (he got his nickname due to serving with the Buffalo Soldiers of the famed US 10th Cavalry), but was pretty much forced to keep the status quo by Wilson and others mainly as a way to keep the peace with southern units in the army.
    Can anybody confirm or deny this?

    • @TheGreatWar
      @TheGreatWar  7 років тому +2

      you will find out when we have our Pershing episode.

  • @BuddyNovinski
    @BuddyNovinski 7 років тому +5

    Having two degrees in history from Penn State, I found this episode quite enlightening. I recall in eighth grade when my teacher talked about WW's "morals", and I had no idea what he had meant. Even that history class never covered the details I learned later. Now I understand WW better thanks to this video.

    • @TheGreatWar
      @TheGreatWar  7 років тому +2

      Glad we could be of assistance. A lot of things are still a mystery to us too in this war, but we are getting there.

  • @steelhammer103
    @steelhammer103 7 років тому +311

    I always preferred TR instead of Wilson.

    • @judgedredd8657
      @judgedredd8657 7 років тому +70

      TR is the most accomplished and interesting person to ever live

    • @shadow16sf
      @shadow16sf 7 років тому +9

      You should read up on Francisco de Miranda. His life is so adventure filled and wild that one could think he was a time-traveler. Definitely up there, if not higher than TR in interesting and accomplished.

    • @MrChiron12
      @MrChiron12 7 років тому +18

      Theodore is probably my favorite president.

    • @williamlydon2554
      @williamlydon2554 7 років тому +24

      Roosevelt was quite active during the war, i'd love to see an episode on him.

    • @judgedredd8657
      @judgedredd8657 7 років тому +5

      id love to see that actually

  • @scottski02
    @scottski02 7 років тому +93

    "Keep it civil."
    You overestimate the abilities of UA-cam commenters.

  • @dakotashelton8703
    @dakotashelton8703 7 років тому +1

    Hey Indy and crew! Thank you all very much for the show and for shedding light on WW1. Without forcing spoilers on other viewers, I have a question for out of the trenches: will there be a video on the American forces in Serbia? Love to know more about it since one of my ancestors service cards show he was stationed there. Thanks!

  • @ajperez6576
    @ajperez6576 7 років тому +56

    Wilson was an Anglophile? I guess that makes him a
    *Puts on sunglasses
    GERMAPHOBE

  • @SealyAl
    @SealyAl 7 років тому +15

    +The Great War Would you do an episode on David Lloyd George (DLG) on a WDWinWW1? He was a major figure prior to the war, a key leader during it and did much to shape the post-war nihilistic view of the war after it. Thanks, and keep up the good work.

  • @nicholasrowley947
    @nicholasrowley947 7 років тому +50

    Here's my opinion of Wilson: He was a politicians politician with ideas that were both respectable and contemptible. He did many things in his life, and he could have done much more had he tried to conjure some of the energy that made Colonel Roosevelt a legend.

    • @nicholasrowley947
      @nicholasrowley947 7 років тому +2

      A generic description for a generic politician.

  • @nicholasarcarese1908
    @nicholasarcarese1908 7 років тому +1

    This is awesome, we just talked about Wilson last week in school, I can't wait to show my teacher.

  • @gilbertramirez6626
    @gilbertramirez6626 7 років тому +1

    I am watching the final episode of American Experience " Great War ".. Thank You for Your open handed handling of WW1 and Wilson's part in in.

  • @monophthalmos9633
    @monophthalmos9633 7 років тому +3

    Churchill rightly said, that without the US entering the war, it would have ended in 1917 as a draw. Woodrow Wilson's decision to enter the war prolonged it for a year. And it was him, who told the Germans, that if they got rid of the Kaiser, they woudl get a better peace deal. The result was chaos in Germany, which led to the implosion of our negotiating position, which led to the treaty of Versailles. The world would have been a better place, if Woodrow Wilson never decided to enter a war, which never touched American interests.

  • @NathanCassidy721
    @NathanCassidy721 7 років тому +6

    "No campaign in the history of this country has been so marked by viciousness, bitterness, and invective."
    ...until 2016.

    • @curt8652
      @curt8652 3 роки тому +3

      Hi, this is 2020 calling..
      "You ain't seen nothing yet."

    • @NathanCassidy721
      @NathanCassidy721 3 роки тому

      @@curt8652 This year is just a whole new level of crazy.

  • @wordsmithgmxch
    @wordsmithgmxch 7 років тому

    Great episode, Indy! Many thanks to you -- and Madeline, of course -- for handling such a monster topic in such depth and with such sensitivity to current concerns), and within the constraints of your format. A few words on why the League never got off the ground in the US would have been welcome. Perhaps in a later episode??

    • @TheGreatWar
      @TheGreatWar  7 років тому

      Yes, that will be covered - in depths - later on.

  • @willjohnson3299
    @willjohnson3299 7 років тому

    Such a awesome time period in American history! This is truly a great show keep up the amazing work Indy and crew!

  • @quillinkhistory9539
    @quillinkhistory9539 7 років тому +6

    This guy should have his own TV show, he´s awesome as a populare historian and TV-personality.

  • @WriteInAaronBushnell
    @WriteInAaronBushnell 7 років тому +18

    he also blew off Hi chi Minh, which could have prevented the war in Vietnam

  • @avnrulz
    @avnrulz 7 років тому

    Love the photo of him giving the longbowman's 'up yours' two-finger salute at 5:32! LOL

  • @callumbailey4454
    @callumbailey4454 7 років тому

    Another exceptionally thoughtful and informative episode from a top notch series! If they ever include UA-cam in Emmy nominations for documentaries, this channel should be first on the list! As a Patreon supporter since March 2015, I hope even more of your fans will realise the value of your work and consider making a small contribution on Patreon.

    • @TheGreatWar
      @TheGreatWar  7 років тому +1

      +Callum Bailey thanks for your support

  • @tpaktop2_1na
    @tpaktop2_1na 7 років тому +18

    If TR did not run again, Taft would have a second term as POTUS versus Wison (50.6% vs 41.8% of votes). Not a fan since Prohibition happen on his (Wilson's) watch among other views.

    • @sethlangston181
      @sethlangston181 3 роки тому

      As many issues as Wilson was responsible for, he actually vetoed against Prohibition. It was Congress who overrode his veto.

    • @tpaktop2_1na
      @tpaktop2_1na 3 роки тому

      @@sethlangston181 Don't make Wilson stand above others. He was a cruise control president. As time goes on such as the Paris Peace talks, you will see how ineffective Wilson was in his leadership. He was out classed in world politics.

  • @kristjanvalgur8871
    @kristjanvalgur8871 7 років тому +9

    In the Eastern part of Europe, Wilson is seen as the figure, who popularized the idea of the right of self-determination for different folks/nations. I originate from Estonia and historians here have debated about it and come to a conclusion that he had an influence on creating new states such as Estonia.
    When it comes to the right of self-determination of nations, the socialist were I think the first to write about, for example Kautsky and Lenin. Even Lenin promised independence to ex-Russian provinces based on the self-determination. As the actions of Soviet Russia's government and mainly Lenin show that when the Great War ended they started to retake the Baltic countries (included is Finland) and Poland. So much of the promises, as it was just cynical pragmatism in the "way of progress".

  • @ralphbernhard1757
    @ralphbernhard1757 7 років тому

    Another excellent review. Keep 'em coming....

  • @gregorymaurer9858
    @gregorymaurer9858 7 років тому

    Great Episode Indy and crew! Thank you for continuing the practice of not injecting current politics into your episodes.

  • @dlracer2
    @dlracer2 2 роки тому +6

    There is the United States before Woodrow Wilson, and the United States after Wilson. It became a different - less free country after him.

  • @G36Ghost
    @G36Ghost 7 років тому +5

    "No campaign, in the history of this country, has been so marked by viscountess, bitterness and invective" boy would he have a laugh reading about 2016.

    • @erraticonteuse
      @erraticonteuse 7 років тому +2

      That's nothing, during the election of 1798, John Adams tried to get a rumor going that Thomas Jefferson had actually died.

  • @lopezrodriguez8372
    @lopezrodriguez8372 7 років тому

    An interesting read on said topic is The Kings Depart by Richard M. Watt. It´s from 1968, a while back, I know. It deals with the postwar German Revolution and with the Allied response. A good portion of the book covers President Wilson, his running for president, presidency as well as his postwar efforts.

  • @MrChunkylover53
    @MrChunkylover53 7 років тому +2

    I am 40 years old. I shook hands with my 90 year old great grandfather who fought in WW1 when i was a boy. My great grandfather shook hands with veterans from the US civil war when he was a boy. Therefore,i have shaken a hand that shook the hand of a civil war veteran. History is not as far away as it seems.

  • @Forlyn0
    @Forlyn0 7 років тому +6

    Indy tells youtube to keep it civil, "Oh boy..."

  • @pizzatime3367
    @pizzatime3367 7 років тому +48

    Just wondering, don't mean to rush you or tell you what to do, are you still thinking about Paul Von Hindenburg?

    • @NerevarOfficialReal
      @NerevarOfficialReal 7 років тому +4

      Mr. Churchill! How are you, my good chap?

    • @TheGreatWar
      @TheGreatWar  7 років тому +89

      +Wnstn Chrchll we're thinking about him every day

    • @stevenjlovelace
      @stevenjlovelace 7 років тому +23

      Oh the humanity! :D

    • @angels2online
      @angels2online 7 років тому +5

      I wonder how many ppl get that. It's not that obscure.

  • @guanmingqiao9887
    @guanmingqiao9887 7 років тому

    Thanks from Davidson College!!

  • @danieldelewis2448
    @danieldelewis2448 5 років тому

    If I'm keeping it civil then I will say I am appreciative of your by the book depiction of Woodrow T. Wilson

  • @kevinoneal9779
    @kevinoneal9779 7 років тому +3

    Oh, I see you're responding to comments! Howdy Flo!

    • @danb7202
      @danb7202 6 років тому +1

      Indiana Neidell I had no idea you had your own channel

  • @mavriss1661
    @mavriss1661 7 років тому +3

    I see Woodrow as the man that supported American neutrality as far as it would go, and was willing to do what was needed when the time came. He did have some more backwards views, but they were less harsh than those before him and you have to start somewhere. In the end he was a visionary statesman I believe.

  • @KnightSlayer135
    @KnightSlayer135 7 років тому +1

    Indie,I went to highschool right down the street from Wesleyan, at Xavier High School in middletown CT

  • @Ben_not_10
    @Ben_not_10 7 років тому

    What I find interesting in all of this is that if you compare the events of that time period (1898-1920) you can see a lot of parallels to our modern situation. The 1916 election and the quote by the secretary of the Navy defiantly spring to mind. It goes to show that as the old saying goes "history repeats itself when no one listened the first time".

  • @ClaireR3
    @ClaireR3 5 років тому +10

    Downfall of the world- Wilson’s Ego

  • @ringowunderlich2241
    @ringowunderlich2241 4 роки тому +9

    The channel forgot to mention, that later on Wilson regretted the Federal Reserve Act. He feared that he had sold out his country to the private banks by giving them the power over the national (later international dominating) currency. The FED was never a public institution.

    • @beachmama9037
      @beachmama9037 3 роки тому

      Eventually the FED will bring down America. End the FED.

    • @person3070
      @person3070 2 роки тому

      there are no primary sources to back up such a claim, sadly. He was still our worst president though

  • @nicoleboyle9255
    @nicoleboyle9255 Рік тому +1

    Never much of a history buff until later in life. With present day political issues. I follow everything. With much opposition to the W.E.F. I know now that W. Wilson has many buildings, etc. in his name in Davos, Switzerland. This had me stumble upon your video and others. Loved the way it was summed up in your presentation . Interesting how the " Progressive's " are quite different today. Thanks again! Best regards...

  • @SeverusVergiliusMaro
    @SeverusVergiliusMaro 7 років тому

    @The Great War Hi Indy and team! This is a rad video, like all of your content, and I really appreciate the way you treat these incredibly important and controversial figures. I think you walk a tough line well, and manage to be tactful without being evasive--and the respect with which you treat these figures is just so refreshing! However, there is one, O! gravest of errors which you have made--the most contemptible, the most unforgivable errors: you pronounced 'Staunton' like a Yankee! Bless your heart--if you go to Staunton you'll find that everyone says "Stan-ton," not "Stawn-ton" or "Stone-ton!" Like Buena Vista (Sorry, it's BYOO-na VIH-stuh) and other towns in the area, the names aren't intuitive (unless you already know). I have often heard that they were pronounced different for the sake regional identity after the Civil War, but the sounds like a folk explanation. Again, love the show, and I hope this comment and pleasant lil'-tidbit o' knowledge meets you well! Have a lovely Monday!

    • @TheGreatWar
      @TheGreatWar  7 років тому +1

      Well, Indy is from TX and hasn't lived in the states for over 20 years. So, this was an error we just had to make. If it's consolation for you, we also regularly butcher British towns and naval turn.

  • @ysersno
    @ysersno 7 років тому +4

    Have you ever done a video on Hermann Goring? Or Karl Donitz?

  • @jefffreeman8905
    @jefffreeman8905 7 років тому +148

    The question of racism must always include another question. "Were they more or less racist than the norm for their time?" There's a terrible tendency to judge people of the past based on MODERN standards, by which even highly progressive people will fail because progressivism has moved well past their point. I don't know the answer for Wilson, but if he's judged, incorrectly, by modern standards then he WILL fail.

    • @RedBull34xxxxx
      @RedBull34xxxxx 7 років тому +43

      Jeff Freeman The dude had a showing for the Birth of a Nation at the White House. Teddy met with Booker T Washington there. Your answer provided.

    • @KILLERDOG416
      @KILLERDOG416 7 років тому +3

      Jeff Freeman that just means teddy much more progressive than most people in his days

    • @bbdawise
      @bbdawise 7 років тому +47

      I actually agree with your main point. People loving holding our ancestors to modern standards.
      However, in Wilson's case, we're talking about a man who openly supported the KKK. People like to assume that every American was a member of the KKK back then but that simply was not the case! Only the racists were racists, everyone else either didn't care at all or actively opposed the racists.

    • @RedBull34xxxxx
      @RedBull34xxxxx 7 років тому +16

      While probable, you don't see the other presidents around him being so obviously racist. While they entertained the idea, they certainly didn't advocate it like Wilson.
      The Birth of a Nation aspect is to show that Wilson actually held these beliefs, as it was a private showing. He wasn't doing it for show.

    • @mjinnh2112
      @mjinnh2112 7 років тому +33

      He was actually pretty racist even for a time when racism was more accepted (and not just racism; all kinds of ethic slurs were considered OK). But Wilson went out of his way to make it difficult for black Americans. This is what made him a true racist; he acted on it. He segregated the federal government, which had been a source of upward mobility for former slaves. This should not be underestimated, considering Washington's geographical location on the border of the south, where the idea of a professional class of African Americans was pretty much a non-starter of an idea. It was a huge set back. Nor should the segregation of the armed forces be downplayed, especially since the virtual codification of the races in WWI set the pattern for continued segregation in WWII. Wilson was appallingly rude to Booker T. Washington in person.

  • @ralphgirard6091
    @ralphgirard6091 7 років тому

    Very good episode.

  • @Wilsonfamily66
    @Wilsonfamily66 7 років тому

    PBS in the US is airing a show called The Great War April 10. I knew you should have gotten a copyright on that name. Now everyone will use it. Much love, keep up the great work.

    • @TheGreatWar
      @TheGreatWar  7 років тому

      Well, guess what will happen when people type "the great war" into the UA-cam search.

  • @ivangushkov3651
    @ivangushkov3651 7 років тому +297

    meh...who wasnt racist back then? Are we honestly gonna start pointing fingers? Cuz every nation had racists in power...

    • @TheGreatWar
      @TheGreatWar  7 років тому +159

      +Ivan Gushkov no one is pointing figures, history is not a pissing contest who was the worst.

    • @jefffreeman8905
      @jefffreeman8905 7 років тому +17

      I wish more people thought that way.

    • @ajeuscher7988
      @ajeuscher7988 7 років тому +3

      Agreed. You gotta look at it in their context not ours. I would like to see how his views compared to other heads of state at the time.

    • @bbdawise
      @bbdawise 7 років тому +17

      ...it's not like every single human on the planet was a racist at that time. This is incredibly flawed logic.

    • @BrorealeK
      @BrorealeK 7 років тому +28

      Mark Twain. Countless other American Progressives. Even a good deal of American Republicans. It's a myth that everyone hated Black people back then. Many abolitionists in the 1860s wanted Black Americans not only to have equal status under the law, but guarantee that status was protected and enforced through Reconstruction. The idea that "everyone was racist" 100 years ago just isn't true. Will people look back at us 100 years from now and say "oh, everyone thought that unarmed Black teenagers were dangerous back then"?

  • @wales2k4747
    @wales2k4747 6 років тому +3

    I just realized that Woodrow Wilson looks like H.P. Lovecraft.

  • @MatanT18
    @MatanT18 5 років тому

    Great Video, Thank You

  • @whatsinanameish
    @whatsinanameish 7 років тому

    It was a throwback to my own childhood in the 70's to see the absolute unchecked automotive smoke at 7:30 . It must have been loud and chokingly bad... Like standing in campfire smoke, or even worse.

  • @borisdelaine9797
    @borisdelaine9797 7 років тому +7

    I like to thank Indy for the fair assessment of President Wilson. No leader is perfect and excused from judgement but President Wilson was a visionary leader with flaws that impacted my family. Up until his Presidency the Navy and the Merchant Marines were places that many Black Americans could enlist and progress but that was changed under President Wilson.

  • @davidcoleman4800
    @davidcoleman4800 6 років тому +4

    As a constitutionalist... some one who wants us to follow the constitution and the original intent; for me Woodrow Wilson is our worst American president of all. I am a firm believer that if we had been following those principles of the constitution and "friendly relations with all nations, tangling alliances with none" the twentieth century would have turned out much differently. Europe would have continued to fight much longer, yes, but would have arrived at more equitable terms for all sides and avoided WWII. The Soviet Union would have collapsed in the first year and been replaced, sparing the world 75 years of the Cold War. --- Keep up the excellent work. You are the history teacher I always loved and wished everyone had in high school :-)

  • @trooper600
    @trooper600 7 років тому

    I love this channel so much i hope you guys continue doing this for ww2 as well

  • @stuartpaul9995
    @stuartpaul9995 6 років тому

    A most interesting video. Bravo.

  • @donaldhill3823
    @donaldhill3823 7 років тому +16

    People often want people from history to be perfectly good or perfectly bad and the truth is that most historical figures are just like everyone else in that they are basically human. They may support great ideas while still having great flaws in their personal character. Over all Woodrow Wilson's actions did great things for the Nation and the world as a whole so I would say on balance he was a good man despite things he did or said that were just plain wrong without defense.

    • @David-fm6go
      @David-fm6go 6 років тому

      That defense works for someone like Lincoln who actually advances the football. The problem for Wilson is that in some ways he was playing defense against change and working against change and even pushing back.

  • @user-ey4mx1ul3n
    @user-ey4mx1ul3n 7 років тому +116

    "First" comments have reached this channel as well. Sad.

    • @spacewardsebas
      @spacewardsebas 7 років тому +8

      Hopefully the racist trolls and supremacists that prolifer in other political and historical channels never reach this channel. Hopefully.

    • @CBfrmcardiff
      @CBfrmcardiff 7 років тому +2

      +spacewardsebas Maybe they're just quiet because they're not generally "triggered".
      Indy and his team do a pretty good job in presenting history in an interesting and incisive, yet inoffensive, way.
      If you have a channel whose character is ideological or which denounces beloved historical figures then you're bound to get a response. In fact, it's a cheap way to get views.

    • @user-ey4mx1ul3n
      @user-ey4mx1ul3n 7 років тому +7

      What I like about this historic channel(and the team behind it of course) is that they aren't biased. They present the events from a clearly informative perspective. There are many extreme nationalists out there though,especially in videos about the Balkans.

    • @hideouspants2947
      @hideouspants2947 7 років тому +1

      They also closed the comment section for the Albanian warlords video as it was absolutely stuffed with comments by nationalistic idiots from the Balkans blaming other ethnic groups that also lived in the Balkans region.

    • @spacewardsebas
      @spacewardsebas 7 років тому

      +Mark Vance Damn, thats sad :/ But as you said, i guess its unavoidable.

  • @DrGonzo94
    @DrGonzo94 7 років тому

    GREAT EPISODE!

  • @jonathangilat3537
    @jonathangilat3537 7 років тому

    Great show

  • @pronon1990
    @pronon1990 7 років тому +4

    He wasn't the best president but but he wasn't the worst I honestly believe that he should've made America join the league of Nations that could help maybe prevented the second world war but I don't know thatBut we were in that time. Were we were just isolationist but good episode though

    • @PLH93
      @PLH93 7 років тому +4

      He wanted America to join the League, but he was blocked by Congress, since he couldn't get the required two thirds majority in the senate to ratify the Treaty of Versailles which created the League.

  • @squirrelsquirellian2829
    @squirrelsquirellian2829 7 років тому +11

    At least he didnt send thousands of men to die of cold in the mountains ?

  • @fanonfrenzy3809
    @fanonfrenzy3809 5 років тому +1

    I've started watching more and more content on mr Wilson, relative to other history channels, this seems very polite. civil enough?

  • @legosys6061
    @legosys6061 7 років тому +1

    Hello Indy and gang! First off I'd like to say I love the show and always look forward to each new episode. My question is what exactly is it that you guys do, your "Job Title" per say and how would one just leaving high school get the type of job that you have exploring the ruins of historic places and discussing them with other historians? What would you major in College and how avalibale would you say such jobs are?

    • @mjinnh2112
      @mjinnh2112 7 років тому +1

      Major in what excites you. If you like your field, you will find cool things to do in it. And cool things will find you too. Start exploring ruins and what interests you and you might be surprised that it leads to work that pays. Sorry, I sound like a Chinese fortune cookie, but it's true!

    • @legosys6061
      @legosys6061 7 років тому

      Madeleine Johnson Thank you for the reply! I have been planning on majoring in archiology but I've read that it doesn't pay well and its very hard to get into so I've been worried about how that would go after I graduate!

  • @briansmith9439
    @briansmith9439 7 років тому +3

    At 10:50 is the Wilson profile made by 1000s of men; do you know if this was one of the ones made at the US Army encampments? I know Camp Dix (NJ) made the Liberty Bell in May 1919. Many people - including many from my home state of NJ - don't know that there was a vociferous debate on who to support in the Civil War - North or South? Many don't realize that south Jersey is south of the Mason-Dixon line. There's a lot to be said about what exactly were Wilson's goals regarding Europe - many point to his 14 Points as the start of US attempts to keep Europe fractured into many small countries rather than amalgamate into one large European Union which would threaten US economic interests - a stance that many see as remaining unchanged even today.

  • @maxheadspace2975
    @maxheadspace2975 7 років тому +7

    Wilson premered the KKK movie "Birth of a Nation" in the WHITE HOUSE, which was instrumental in the resurgence of the Klan. He was absolutely a racist.

    • @castor3020
      @castor3020 6 років тому

      entertaining racist guests does not make one racist. Acting in a racist manner does, learn the difference.
      Not advocating that Wilson is/isn't racist, just stating that your statement is untrue.

    • @williehardiman6766
      @williehardiman6766 6 років тому

      Kastor Hallavainio he was probably racist also just not to the point where he wanted to see blacks hanging from trees. He was a product of his time.

    • @aoli8142
      @aoli8142 4 роки тому +1

      @@castor3020 Yeah, he *illegally* fired all black employees from the white house to entertaib guests too

  • @itwaslikethatwhenigothere
    @itwaslikethatwhenigothere 7 років тому +2

    could I make a suggestion that you do a special about Sir John Monash. I read a biography about him last year and I was suprised to learn how important that someone from my home state was in the great war.

  • @evankimori
    @evankimori 6 років тому

    Wilson's 14 points and links to that awesome political cartoon in the video?
    Why thank you!

  • @benjamingriffith4183
    @benjamingriffith4183 7 років тому +8

    Progressive (progress) anti-war, anti-corruption. Right there alone makes me highly respect Wilson. Especially since he wouldn't allow him self to be a puppet for corporate NJ.
    8 hour work day.
    Many popular social programs still to day.
    Good president IMO

    • @khalilmason
      @khalilmason 7 років тому +8

      Benjamin Griffith he signed the federal reserve act, and agreed for all Americans that we'd have to pay interest on the money the Fed prints and then loans to our banks. He fucked us all.

  • @mkd2839
    @mkd2839 7 років тому +4

    Woo Woo Woodrow Wilson, Waver of the freedom stick

  • @pyrobird2015
    @pyrobird2015 7 років тому +1

    Hello Indy and The Great War team!
    I was wondering if you could recommend some books about WW1,because i would like to read more about the event and have them near me when I want to remember stuff and it seems that you know history and trustworthy writers. It does not matter if they are on a particular subject or in general.
    Thank you very much in advance!

  • @Mr110074
    @Mr110074 5 років тому +2

    Interesting story. One of the courses I took in college was American History 1914-1945. When we got around to Wilson, the professor told us a story how in the 70s when was a young campaign worker for a Democratic candidate, he went door to door talking to people. One of these people was an old black lady and she told him how she never votes Democrat because her father lost his job at the White House thanks to Wilson. This was like 60 years later. Just something I found Very interesting.

  • @Duke_of_Lorraine
    @Duke_of_Lorraine 7 років тому +141

    1916 re-election line : "he kept us out of the war"
    Flash forward to 1918 : still more thrustworthy than Hillary

    • @kellychuang8373
      @kellychuang8373 7 років тому +1

      That really sums it up or at least he kept us out for as long as he could.

    • @furripupau
      @furripupau 7 років тому +15

      Thrustworthy? Is that some sort of sex innuendo?

    • @cpob2013
      @cpob2013 7 років тому +6

      well, he DID keep us out of war
      then more of our ships were sunk and we discovered germany wanted to instigate full scale war with mexico, thats kinda grounds for war. whether you want it or not war has practically been declared on you

    • @blaze_0077
      @blaze_0077 7 років тому +2

      @ *yungsavage* Dude, Trump is *NOT* a *Communist,* *Communism* is an extreme left-wing ideology, you can't get any farther left than *Communism,* Communism is a socioeconomic ideology that wants the common ownership of the means of production, they want to abolish money, social classes etc. Marxist Communism basically wants complete social and economic equality, where there is no rich or no poor, and everyone is equal, basically what Jesus would have been, Jesus would have been either a Socialist or a Communist. "From each according to his ability to each according to his need". You can read about Communism here:
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism
      Trump is a right-winger, he's a Conservative, so if anything he would be a *Fascist* , *Fascism* is an extreme right-wing ideology, it's what the Axis Powers were during World War 2, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Hideki Tojo were all Fascists, *Fascism* is an *Authoritarian Nationalist* ideology that believes in centralized government run by a dictator, militarization of the government, due to the extreme patriotic/nationalistic nature of Fascism racism usually comes along with it.
      *"Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties. Such a state is led by a strong leader-such as a dictator and a martial government composed of the members of the governing fascist party-to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society. Fascism rejects assertions that violence is automatically negative in nature, and views political violence, war, and imperialism as means that can achieve national rejuvenation. Fascists advocate a mixed economy, with the principal goal of achieving autarky through protectionist and interventionist economic policies."*
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
      It's a Left-Right political spectrum, on the left you have Liberals, Progressives, Social Democrats, Liberal Socialists, Democratic Socialists, Socialists, and Communists etc. On the right you have Conservatism, right-Libertarianism, Alt-Right, and Fascists etc.
      The left-wing wants more social and economic equality, supporting welfare, higher wages, workers rights, higher taxation on the rich, free healthcare for EVERYONE as a right, minority rights, women's rights, pro-abortion, pro-euthanasia, they support gay marriage, they promote tolerance, peace, anti-war, multiculturalism, environmentalism etc. While the right are traditionalists hence the name *Conservative,* they basically want the status quo and are usually opposed to change and progressive policies, they believe in "Family Values", "Religious Values", less welfare, lower taxes on the rich and lower taxes in general, less regulations, they're against abortion, they oppose gay marriage ,"Traditional Values" etc. they support gun rights and promote the private sector and promote free market capitalism in economics.
      But on social issues the more they want to control the people and take away rights and freedoms are known as *Authoritarians* and *Totalitarians.* There's the Authoritarian Left and the Authoritarian Right. For instance, Adolf Hitler was a Totalitarian Fascist, he was a far-right totalitarian, Josef Stalin was a Totalitarian Communist, so he was a far-left totalitarian.
      You should read more about left-right politics and educate yourself more if you want to get into politics.
      You should read this, *Left-Right Political Spectrum:* en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left%E2%80%93right_politics

    • @giossj4fusion87
      @giossj4fusion87 7 років тому

      Duke of Lorraine 5 months after Wilsons re election, he declared war

  • @conflicthorizon
    @conflicthorizon 6 років тому +4

    The problem is. People of today see things differently then they did a hundred years ago. He had obligations at the time, that due to the times, he needed to abide by. Its the whole hind-sight is 20/20. Its easier to judge someone from the outside, especially when the lived a hundred years ago.

  • @ottovonbismarck7094
    @ottovonbismarck7094 7 років тому +2

    Just as a random gun fact, the British fired 5 million bullets trough a vickers gun in one sitting, it took them one week of continuous fire to get through those bullets.

  • @grandtheftauto5588
    @grandtheftauto5588 5 місяців тому +1

    The hate against Woodrow Wilson is totally overblown. If you weigh the pros vs cons, Wilson was overwhelmingly a positive force.

  • @seanwon88
    @seanwon88 7 років тому +30

    I'm not crazy about this income tax, Woodrow

    • @DavidSmith-ss1cg
      @DavidSmith-ss1cg 5 років тому +1

      The Income tax was started to compensate for losing the tax income from liquor sales, so that passage of the Volstead Act(Prohibition ) wouldn't leave the US government short of money .

  • @ajperez6576
    @ajperez6576 7 років тому +5

    "Wilson established the Federal Reserve"
    makes me cringe when I hear that

  • @andrewczuba498
    @andrewczuba498 6 років тому

    thx indie. you make history cool again !

  • @SamonMarquis
    @SamonMarquis 7 років тому

    The book "Lies My Teacher Told Me" dove into Woodrow Wilson, too. Some of what the author wrote mirrored this upload.

  • @skykid
    @skykid 7 років тому +12

    "This is what real democrats are like!"
    This was 100 years ago. Politics has changed immeasurably since then, and the parties are not the same. Stop twisting the unbiased history in this channel to support your rhetoric.

    • @stevencagle9640
      @stevencagle9640 4 роки тому

      Lolol....because all of those racist demo politicians changed overnight

  • @alanpattee4383
    @alanpattee4383 7 років тому +6

    Wilson was a P.O.S. to bad Roosevelt didn't win!

  • @YourTypicalMental
    @YourTypicalMental 7 років тому +1

    I can only imagine how much harder Flo's job is going to get in the coming year or so. ESPECIALLY if you guys cover such nebulous and controversial topics like the League of Nations. As much as I love Flo, I can't say I envy his job.

    • @YourTypicalMental
      @YourTypicalMental 7 років тому

      I'm just worried the darker underbelly of the internet will bubble up once again much like it did in the comments of the Finance episode, which turned so toxic and ugly they were ultimately (and rightly so) disabled. Than I recall a post on Facebook regarding the coverage of the Russia Revolution where he had to step in and state there would be no tolerance of hateful and violent comments about one political ideology or another. I just hope we're all mature enough to not burn him out.
      Since I got your attention for a moment, Indy. Can I say the work you and the rest are doing covering the Great War is truly noble and valuable to the world. And hopefully we can maybe get an origin story about our main man Flo on Out of the Trenches?

  • @SuperManning11
    @SuperManning11 2 роки тому

    Just FYI, Staunton Virginia is actually pronounced ‘Stanton’. This was a fantastic video-well done!