Michael is so unconventionally handsome. So much talent and intelligence and personality. It's really neat to see the person behind one of my all-time favorite characters created for a show or film.
It can’t get better than that: coming home after the long day at work and finding out that Joe Rogan’s interview with resurrected Christopher Moltisanti and Bobby Baccareli... Wow! Praise the Lord for these short moments of glory!
It was because when Clint was doing Westerns...the director would yell "action!!!" and it would scare the horses. So, quietly saying "go" was preferred.
He also doesn't like to shoot too many takes. Matt Damon asked him once if he could do another take and Clint said "Why? You want to waste everyone's time?" Clint used to work on TV shows where they shot a lot of footage a day and if you "wasted time" with reshoots you'd never get anything done.
This makes me think about when Claudia Cardinale (an Italian actress) describe the set managed by Luchino Visconti as the polar opposite from the one of Federico Fellini. The former was like sacred place to which only few people had access and everything had to play out meticulously in accordance to planning, from design details to lines. The latter was apparently a mayhem where the director let everybody do his thing (practically no script just as libbing) and the scene somehow emerged organically from that inspired chaos.
Anyone who has written a script knows that there are times when lines have to read a certain way and times when it can be free. On the flip side, if the actors are not having fun being part of the creation process, that's going to affect the morale of the whole production.
I think that the trick is to just have them do it different ways until they give the exact line reading you want, but never actually say the line reading to them, lol.
As an actor (theatre) I don't mind getting a line reading IF I ASK FOR IT. When I direct, I hate giving them because I want the actor to figure it out themselves. I only ever do it if they ask, or if we're running out of time in the rehearsal.
I agree 100%. I acted once in a PSA where the director gave line readings as his only way if giving direction. That was frustrating. But I think they have their place as a last resort when you are running out of time and need to move on to the next scene. As a director, line readings are especially helpful when working with non-actors who aren't skilled yet at taking direction and haven't learned to be pretentious about line readings yet. As an actor, asking for a line reading after you've done a bunch of takes already and still aren't giving the director what they want, especially on a corporate gig with dialogue that isn't how real people talk, can be a life saver. A line reading doesn't immediately disable you into a parrot unless you believe it will. You should be able to go in the direction of the inflections they just gave you and still make them your own.
As a writer, there are times where you know the line has to be said a certain way because you designed the pacing of the scene a certain way and you can't express that with words.
North American UA-camr It goes both ways. In Michael’s story, it sounds like it was the directors fault for giving vague, unhelpful directions. Probably wasn’t a good director. In other situations, it’ll be the actors fault (intentional or not) if they don’t execute the director’s vision. Line readings suck, and actors who have an issue with a great director trying to execute his or her vision suck too. It’s also about rapport. Scorsese has rapport with his leads because they’re the same people over and over again, so it makes sense that a smaller role (like Michael) would fall into place a lot easier and view it as a productive environment. A legendary director working with legendary actors? Of course that’s a great environment.
Well "as an actor" 😂😂😂 what a douchebag. We kno ur a terrible actor. How many times does he say "as an actor"? Lol we kno as an actor youre better then everyone we get it.
I'm glad to hear what they have to say....what concerns me is that when I write, sometimes I do have a clear idea of how I want a line to be said. It bugs me that as a director, I'm not allowed to even suggest how they say it. My input may change how they decide to interpret the line. I'd like to hear from some actors who also direct.
I agree. When you write a screenplay, there are times a line HAS to be read a certain way, or else it misses the entire idea. There are so many things dependent on so many other things. So many personalities and egos, and no "official right way" to do things in art, unlike with engineering. Everybody might think their way is the best. That's why directing can be so difficult.
Wouldn’t telling the actor the emotion or state of mind you want guide them to find the line and delivery you want? Isn’t part of the director’s job keeping the performance on track, due to shooting scenes out of sequence?
@@jgmediting7770 if youre making a highly stylistic film and you have a clear picture of how you want something i dont see why you cant ask an actor to say something in a certain way. I feel like their should be some moving room between turning the actor into a human parrot and making a completely different movie because you dont want to hurt an actors ego
I'm an actress pretty much all my life I've been involved in the theater and I don't care if I get a line reading, it hasn't happened to me yet, but I don't think I would be flipping out. I would not do it if I were a director because I know it's a major faux pas. Every actor is different, directors should know how many actors feel about line readings, I personally don't care but i've met actors who would fight over a line reading.
I'm a Voice Actor and from time to time I do voices for video games. Usually, the VO Director has a very particular concept for the lines. If I'm not hitting the lines just right they'll read it to me the way they had in mind. I think it's great when that happens because it makes my job easier and we get to move on to the next scene/character that much faster. It's the same for Radio Spots and even some Kickstarter videos I've narrated. If the client wants things done in a certain way so be it! My job is to provide the read in that way. One day I had to be an amped up Sportscaster, an Evil King and a Young Warrior back to back to back...who the hell wants to spend all day hoping to get things right when you can just have the Director read the line how they want it and then match that performance?! The other 99.9% of the lines are being read how I see fit...who cares that the Director actually did their damn job and got the performance out of me that was required for the gig?? What a weird thing to complain about...
If a writer or director has a very specific vision for a scene, it should probably be followed, assuming you trust them. The writer should EXPLAIN the way he envisions the scene to play out and WHY he thinks it needs to be done that way. On the flip side, a scene can be improved if the actors get into it and really feel the moment. They can make it better than what the writer or director had planned. It's a give and take and there are no right answers.
Dude it's fine to mimic the director for generic video game roles where most likely your voice is stylized, hyped up and cartoony anyways, as your lines are likely gonna be 3 second sound bytes some NPC shouts. But if you are doing a serious film, trying to copy your directors voice would be bad because he's not an actor, he can't act as well as you can, it would just feel totally unnatural and stilted.
@@dialecticalmonist3405 EXACTLY! Some lines are best delivered 100% the way the Director envisions and some lines are best 100% improvised by the actor.
Bobby B talks a lot, which is great because he tells good stories, but I watched the whole episode and you can tell Joe wanted to hear Michael's take on line readings by readdressing him after Bobby cuts him off a bit...
It's well known that Schirripa can't stfu. He constantly interrupts Imperioli (go watch _any_ episode of Talking Sopranos) and it's infuriating since Imperioli is obviously far smarter than him.
Folks, the version of the new Scarface is based on Mexico and Cartels from what I understand. Pacino’s version was a remake of a 1930’s/40’s on the mob, bootlegging, and even unions/work force. Pacino’s was on the Cuban immigrant coming to America.
I feel like both approaches can work sufficiently depending on the director/actor. Tarantino requires actors to say his lines as he wants them while Scorsese is far more open minded and collaborative. Two of the best ever with their own ideas of how a production should go
Which is exactly how their movies appear to the audience. Scorsese is all about the atmosphere. He doesn't tinker around with the pacing and lets the actors make it look more authentic. Tarantino is all about pacing and timing. Everything depends on WHEN things are delivered. It looks less authentic and has a comic book quality, but that's what most of his movies are trying to be anyway.
Modern Hollywood is not about making films it is about activism and giving voice to the producers ideologies. Nothing more than that. Most people can sense that something was wrong with Star Wars but could not put their finger on it but if you look at it and aware of the ideologies present in Hollywood you can see why the films are turning out so bad. They are going to destroy the next generation of Marvel films in the name of ideology.
@@bighands69 Hollywood has always been an avenue for propaganda. Its just back then artists had a bit more integrity and separated the art from the person.
3:50-3:56 you just gave a comical face. I watch so much tv, I think the use of music and sounds of the set is underrated. Also, it could because there is too much pressure? And then you get inside your head. I do not know...I am not you.
I had a friend where if I wanted to mock-put him in his place, I'd say, "Look, little buddy, you may think you're a big shot, but when it comes to [insert topic here], I'm Joe Pesci, and you...are Spider."
Ooofff it's nice when actors know how to improvise and can be tolled be like this, and instead of being in their head they'll try create something original. Your job is to be directed, not bossed around. Directed.
I’ll do like what my favorite director Sergio Leone, I’d play the score as the scene is rolling I’ll let them imagine this scene, their character, their passion, and let them grow from there
Like most things in the world, acting/movie quality has decreased and it’s largely due to line reading, unoriginality, constant remakes, special effects playing more of a part than plot and studio interference.
I feel like UA-cam buried these videos to this interview and I literally have not seen one of these in my suggest box I had to go to the page to find them
It doesn't bother Schrippa because he isn't much of an actor anyway. Michal Imperioli is a world-class, trained actor - that's why he won't stand for line-readings.
Can someone please tell me what the difference is between a line from a script and a "line" reading? If they are the same, then I must be missing something. Actors read the (or from the) script right? What am I missing?
A line reading is when the director tells you exactly how to say it. For example I can say go to bed like in a sweet way or any or go f yourself, telling the actor exactly how to say the line when it's supposed to be up to their interpretation and the director's job to direct them if they're not delivering.
Chris maltosonti put in mad work in the Sopranos. He got busy for real . Even had to get adriana wacked . He was loyal to the mob . But he couldn't stop the H . This guy is a great actor . The other guy brought Bobby to life too .
Some very good directors were alright actors and some very good actors have become pretty good directors. The best directors weren’t really that great actors, if they acted at all. At least I don’t think so. Clint Eastwood was a good actor and is a pretty good director, but isn’t one of the best. There are also legendary great directors that notoriously suck at acting; Quentin Tarantino comes to mind.
FFS theyre making acting seem like splitting atoms. Christophah couldnt understand what means "make a comical face" ?? Its not that he didnt understand, its that he was being a pretentious arogant as5hat who felt he was better than that. He was after all PERFORMING as an ARTIST, as a THESPIAN and a true master of his craft. You dont just grimace or do physical labor. Who do they think theyre talking to. He cannot make some mere comical face, he explores and portrays the truth of his character from the deepest recesses of his being only to establish a mutual dialect and rapport with another thespian performing. A comical face ? *hand backwards gently on forehead* "Ah....eh..."
“You’re not gonna believe this. He killed 16 Czechoslovakians. This guy was an interior decorator”
“His house looked like shit:”
I’ve seeing this joke for years and it still cracks me up
Speaking of line readings, I think that's one of the things that made the joke so funny. Chris' confusion in his voice makes the joke work even better
Steve schrripa being ok with line reading is the most Bobby bacala thing ever
haha good observation
He's fine with it as long as he doesn't have to play Santa.
To the victor belongs the spoils
Honestly it's because he's more of a role player, and didn't sleep and breath it as a craft coming up.
Lmao
Director : “make a funny face..”
Actor: “ I don’t know what that means”
Joe Pesci: “funny how? I’m a clown , I amuse you? What do you mean funny?”
Hahahahha
I want to like your comment but i don't want to ruin your 69ing
I read that comment in his voice
Close
"Oh, oh, Anthony. He's a big boy, he knows what he said. What did ya say? Funny how?"
That was actually a pretty good impression of Junior. 1:16
Quasimodo predicted all of this.
@@valer48 Nostradamus
Bear Left, so we went home
Did you close the door?
Michael is so unconventionally handsome. So much talent and intelligence and personality. It's really neat to see the person behind one of my all-time favorite characters created for a show or film.
unconventional? only guy that could smoke a cigarette in the rain with his hands tied behind his back
@@wesjanson6979 it's that natural canopy
Glad he recovered from his heroin addiction, and the death of Adriana.
@@wesjanson6979 you can't make that shit up.
He's conventionally handsome. You mean he's Italian/ethnic?
"And he was telling him how to be funny" Someone should try that with Schaub
2loop
LMAO
Totally agree.
Why anyone has Schaub on anything is beyond me.
He always interrupts and is never interesting or funny
I hate being negative but he's just terrible
Who's Schaub?
It can’t get better than that: coming home after the long day at work and finding out that Joe Rogan’s interview with resurrected Christopher Moltisanti and Bobby Baccareli... Wow! Praise the Lord for these short moments of glory!
BaccarelI?
Boom, spoiler, my own fault, I guess. I got to say that I wasn't expecting that. I thought people would talk about the subject matter :/
@@ZPSBestProfileName did you ever watch it?
I've heard Clint Eastwood as a Director is very easy to work with.He doesn't even yell ''Action''He's like ''OK go ahead''
I would love to work with him:)
Yes , apparently he is incredibly chill and shows up on set quite late (compared to other directors)
It was because when Clint was doing Westerns...the director would yell "action!!!" and it would scare the horses. So, quietly saying "go" was preferred.
He also doesn't like to shoot too many takes.
Matt Damon asked him once if he could do another take and Clint said "Why? You want to waste everyone's time?"
Clint used to work on TV shows where they shot a lot of footage a day and if you "wasted time" with reshoots you'd never get anything done.
When Michael Imperioli says he doesn't know what "make a comical face" means, I believe him.
Looking at Michael Imperioli now makes me feel kinda old.
when I was young, you ladies were old; now I’m old, and you ladies are STILL old!
Indeed.
Diplamatik Juan
Poor you.
@@giggertmcbabby5140 LOL....paulie...LOL
Then again, Dominic Chianese is only 89 years old!
His portrayal of Christopher is so captivating.
This makes me think about when Claudia Cardinale (an Italian actress) describe the set managed by Luchino Visconti as the polar opposite from the one of Federico Fellini. The former was like sacred place to which only few people had access and everything had to play out meticulously in accordance to planning, from design details to lines. The latter was apparently a mayhem where the director let everybody do his thing (practically no script just as libbing) and the scene somehow emerged organically from that inspired chaos.
“in my muda’s wake... Jesus Christ”
"When I came in to open up one morning, there you where with your head half in the toilet, your hair was in the toilet water. Disgusting."
Christfuah
Hahhahahahah...
U killed my dog christfuah
He musta been lookin for warmth
Why was it barking?
Electric Shepherd ho ho ho what? You killed a dog!?
Anyone who has written a script knows that there are times when lines have to read a certain way and times when it can be free.
On the flip side, if the actors are not having fun being part of the creation process, that's going to affect the morale of the whole production.
I think that the trick is to just have them do it different ways until they give the exact line reading you want, but never actually say the line reading to them, lol.
@@EGarrett01 this is the correct answer.
As an actor (theatre) I don't mind getting a line reading IF I ASK FOR IT. When I direct, I hate giving them because I want the actor to figure it out themselves. I only ever do it if they ask, or if we're running out of time in the rehearsal.
I agree 100%. I acted once in a PSA where the director gave line readings as his only way if giving direction. That was frustrating. But I think they have their place as a last resort when you are running out of time and need to move on to the next scene. As a director, line readings are especially helpful when working with non-actors who aren't skilled yet at taking direction and haven't learned to be pretentious about line readings yet. As an actor, asking for a line reading after you've done a bunch of takes already and still aren't giving the director what they want, especially on a corporate gig with dialogue that isn't how real people talk, can be a life saver. A line reading doesn't immediately disable you into a parrot unless you believe it will. You should be able to go in the direction of the inflections they just gave you and still make them your own.
As a writer, there are times where you know the line has to be said a certain way because you designed the pacing of the scene a certain way and you can't express that with words.
North American UA-camr It goes both ways. In Michael’s story, it sounds like it was the directors fault for giving vague, unhelpful directions. Probably wasn’t a good director. In other situations, it’ll be the actors fault (intentional or not) if they don’t execute the director’s vision. Line readings suck, and actors who have an issue with a great director trying to execute his or her vision suck too.
It’s also about rapport. Scorsese has rapport with his leads because they’re the same people over and over again, so it makes sense that a smaller role (like Michael) would fall into place a lot easier and view it as a productive environment. A legendary director working with legendary actors? Of course that’s a great environment.
Well "as an actor" 😂😂😂 what a douchebag. We kno ur a terrible actor. How many times does he say "as an actor"? Lol we kno as an actor youre better then everyone we get it.
@@dialecticalmonist3405 I don't know, you seem to have just expressed it pretty well. Not arguing, just saying.
Line readings never had the makings of a varsity athlete.
Little moxie for its size.
"Make a funny face", whatever happened there...
'why cant it be somethin good?'
This is such a worn out joke comment but it still makes me laugh every dang time
Lmaoooo the director said he wasn’t good at giving directions
Christopher Montisanti was my favorite in the sopranos, great actor!
4:38 doesn’t even bother saying the movie is Goodfellas lol
noticed that. was hoping Joe would ask/mention that lol
Its called being humble
Koondoon or whatever Chris shouted at him in The Sopranos ha
@@redwingsfan3621 He liked it!
@@Bigwaffel98 You’re right, he did! 😂
Christapha was my fav character !!!
Imperioli/Schirripa 2024
i feel old. i remember when michael imperioli was just a teenager.
Michael seems like a cool dude. Down to earth.
Boy were you wrong lmao.
@@DracoPadillahow isn’t he ? Just looking for context
Funny since I remember Christopher giving line readings to Sandra Bernhardt on set
to be fair, she needs all the help she can get.
buchiach
I love all of the Sopranos actors, they r so real n relatable. Truly make me laugh. Just 100!
Mickael has a such class particularly
Fantastic interview.
I'm glad to hear what they have to say....what concerns me is that when I write, sometimes I do have a clear idea of how I want a line to be said. It bugs me that as a director, I'm not allowed to even suggest how they say it. My input may change how they decide to interpret the line. I'd like to hear from some actors who also direct.
I agree.
When you write a screenplay, there are times a line HAS to be read a certain way, or else it misses the entire idea.
There are so many things dependent on so many other things. So many personalities and egos, and no "official right way" to do things in art, unlike with engineering.
Everybody might think their way is the best. That's why directing can be so difficult.
Wouldn’t telling the actor the emotion or state of mind you want guide them to find the line and delivery you want?
Isn’t part of the director’s job keeping the performance on track, due to shooting scenes out of sequence?
@@jgmediting7770 if youre making a highly stylistic film and you have a clear picture of how you want something i dont see why you cant ask an actor to say something in a certain way. I feel like their should be some moving room between turning the actor into a human parrot and making a completely different movie because you dont want to hurt an actors ego
That was a great Jr impression
Imperioli in the office was amazing as the karate teacher. Freaking hillarious
I'm an actress pretty much all my life I've been involved in the theater and I don't care if I get a line reading, it hasn't happened to me yet, but I don't think I would be flipping out. I would not do it if I were a director because I know it's a major faux pas. Every actor is different, directors should know how many actors feel about line readings, I personally don't care but i've met actors who would fight over a line reading.
Director: "You know you're a stuttering mumbling prick ya"
Micheal seems so cool, I absolutely loved Christopher and his story arch, so talented.
I'm a Voice Actor and from time to time I do voices for video games. Usually, the VO Director has a very particular concept for the lines. If I'm not hitting the lines just right they'll read it to me the way they had in mind. I think it's great when that happens because it makes my job easier and we get to move on to the next scene/character that much faster. It's the same for Radio Spots and even some Kickstarter videos I've narrated. If the client wants things done in a certain way so be it! My job is to provide the read in that way.
One day I had to be an amped up Sportscaster, an Evil King and a Young Warrior back to back to back...who the hell wants to spend all day hoping to get things right when you can just have the Director read the line how they want it and then match that performance?! The other 99.9% of the lines are being read how I see fit...who cares that the Director actually did their damn job and got the performance out of me that was required for the gig?? What a weird thing to complain about...
@Brando J. im fairly certain he was being sarcastic
If a writer or director has a very specific vision for a scene, it should probably be followed, assuming you trust them.
The writer should EXPLAIN the way he envisions the scene to play out and WHY he thinks it needs to be done that way.
On the flip side, a scene can be improved if the actors get into it and really feel the moment. They can make it better than what the writer or director had planned.
It's a give and take and there are no right answers.
Dude it's fine to mimic the director for generic video game roles where most likely your voice is stylized, hyped up and cartoony anyways, as your lines are likely gonna be 3 second sound bytes some NPC shouts. But if you are doing a serious film, trying to copy your directors voice would be bad because he's not an actor, he can't act as well as you can, it would just feel totally unnatural and stilted.
@@123mandalore777 You're right...it's not 35 straight minutes of narration in character it's just NPC's. ;)
@@dialecticalmonist3405 EXACTLY! Some lines are best delivered 100% the way the Director envisions and some lines are best 100% improvised by the actor.
The flying gavone brothas
"Make a funny face", whatever happened there...
Come to think of it, I've yet to see Michael in a Coen Brothers film.
that would be fantastic
Exactly my thoughts as he talked about directors!
That shit wouldn't fly with them😅
Imperioli is a.fucking legend🙏
Bobby B talks a lot, which is great because he tells good stories, but I watched the whole episode and you can tell Joe wanted to hear Michael's take on line readings by readdressing him after Bobby cuts him off a bit...
It's well known that Schirripa can't stfu. He constantly interrupts Imperioli (go watch _any_ episode of Talking Sopranos) and it's infuriating since Imperioli is obviously far smarter than him.
Then why did he tell the actress to say PUCIACCA!???
Line reading is not a screen test. It's either one or the other.
Is Imperioli going to play Sosa in the Scarface remake? He has the suit already.
They aren't really going to try and remake Scarface, are they?
Folks, the version of the new Scarface is based on Mexico and Cartels from what I understand. Pacino’s version was a remake of a 1930’s/40’s on the mob, bootlegging, and even unions/work force. Pacino’s was on the Cuban immigrant coming to America.
I feel like both approaches can work sufficiently depending on the director/actor. Tarantino requires actors to say his lines as he wants them while Scorsese is far more open minded and collaborative. Two of the best ever with their own ideas of how a production should go
I'd shut up and listen to Tarantino..
Which is exactly how their movies appear to the audience.
Scorsese is all about the atmosphere. He doesn't tinker around with the pacing and lets the actors make it look more authentic.
Tarantino is all about pacing and timing. Everything depends on WHEN things are delivered. It looks less authentic and has a comic book quality, but that's what most of his movies are trying to be anyway.
Dialectical Monist I agree with you. I think you put it very well about the style of Tarantino’s films.
Dialectical Monist o
@@dialecticalmonist3405 That’s a perfect description of both their styles, makes sense cause it really feels like that
Steven Segal mastered this technique as director.
Ben's Dad From The Secret Life Of The American Teenager 🤣😂
"I'm a dude..playin a dude...pretending to be another.." and sceennee...lmao
Acting is the actor's art. Movies are the director's art. Hollywood is the producer's art.
Tell me you just made that up.
Modern Hollywood is not about making films it is about activism and giving voice to the producers ideologies.
Nothing more than that. Most people can sense that something was wrong with Star Wars but could not put their finger on it but if you look at it and aware of the ideologies present in Hollywood you can see why the films are turning out so bad.
They are going to destroy the next generation of Marvel films in the name of ideology.
to shine is the shineboxes art
bighand69 Damn right! Modern hollywood along with their shitty superhero trash is garbage.
@@bighands69 Hollywood has always been an avenue for propaganda. Its just back then artists had a bit more integrity and separated the art from the person.
Quasimodo predicted all these problems.
Nostradamus.
Quasimodo wad the hunchback of notre dam
Great show.......! 🤓
UP IN DA CLUB!
Joost di munny.
Bella tele-vizione. Aych di ti vi com-padi-ble.
Gimme a wun tousin dolla 🤌👇
Where can I find full episode?
3:50-3:56 you just gave a comical face. I watch so much tv, I think the use of music and sounds of the set is underrated. Also, it could because there is too much pressure? And then you get inside your head. I do not know...I am not you.
Spider, bring me a Cutty
I had a friend where if I wanted to mock-put him in his place, I'd say, "Look, little buddy, you may think you're a big shot, but when it comes to [insert topic here], I'm Joe Pesci, and you...are Spider."
I thought you said you ok?
Hey look its Spider! Make me a fucken drink!
I fucking love these guys!
Bobby looks great
He looks like he's sittin' on a shinebox.
Ooofff it's nice when actors know how to improvise and can be tolled be like this, and instead of being in their head they'll try create something original.
Your job is to be directed, not bossed around. Directed.
Are line readings the same as table readings
Doesn’t sound like it. Sounds like a line reading is being told how to say the line. Table readings are the cast reading through the script.
NO!
I’ll do like what my favorite director Sergio Leone, I’d play the score as the scene is rolling I’ll let them imagine this scene, their character, their passion, and let them grow from there
Having those beautiful scores playing must certainly make you feel like you’re the characters
I still can’t believe that they let Bobby beat tony up on his birthday no less, woah whatta ya doin ova heea?
Like most things in the world, acting/movie quality has decreased and it’s largely due to line reading, unoriginality, constant remakes, special effects playing more of a part than plot and studio interference.
This is Joe Rogan peak performance, getting the most out of top level guests
I feel like UA-cam buried these videos to this interview and I literally have not seen one of these in my suggest box I had to go to the page to find them
Looks like Michael's right eyebrow is just hanging around his forehead regardless of his face's expression
This one was cut to short.
Why does Michael Imperioli look like he’s trying to open his eyes as wide as possible.
He’s an interior decorator.
Really? His apartment looked like shit.
What is line readings?
It doesn't bother Schrippa because he isn't much of an actor anyway. Michal Imperioli is a world-class, trained actor - that's why he won't stand for line-readings.
@Chi Sam ??
@Chi Sam No. I learned long ago not to engage with unsolicited oddballs on the internet.
Supposedly Polanski gave Nicholson line readings on Chinatown. If that’s the case if I were an actor, good enough for me.
Can someone please tell me what the difference is between a line from a script and a "line" reading? If they are the same, then I must be missing something. Actors read the (or from the) script right? What am I missing?
A line reading is when the director tells you exactly how to say it. For example I can say go to bed like in a sweet way or any or go f yourself, telling the actor exactly how to say the line when it's supposed to be up to their interpretation and the director's job to direct them if they're not delivering.
madonaa
CHRISTOFAH has white hair now
Where the Gabbagu
Watching this segment l thought of Mickey Rourke...
He reminds me of Larry from threes company
Watch " how to deal with a rude cashier"
LEGEND
Chris maltosonti put in mad work in the Sopranos. He got busy for real . Even had to get adriana wacked . He was loyal to the mob . But he couldn't stop the H . This guy is a great actor . The other guy brought Bobby to life too .
Dominic Chianese is only 89 years old? Looked about 100 towards the end of the show.
I take it Chase told Bobby to be himself then
Tarantino launched careers from actors who blew him away in line reads (deputy from kill Bill for example)
I hope michael goes back on by himself.
Sounds annoying as hell
Does Chris need any gear? be down the block, 250 a gram coke, Australian price.
I don't think we will see Michael Imperioli in a cohen bro film:)
I'm not very good at direction
I keep thinking this is a Joey Diaz podcast😂😂
ive heard the best directors were actors before
Makes perfect sense.
They’re also plenty of great directors that were never actors either, so I don’t know how true that is.
@@andrew2155 should ive added the word some?
Some very good directors were alright actors and some very good actors have become pretty good directors.
The best directors weren’t really that great actors, if they acted at all. At least I don’t think so. Clint Eastwood was a good actor and is a pretty good director, but isn’t one of the best.
There are also legendary great directors that notoriously suck at acting; Quentin Tarantino comes to mind.
Anmeldn - editors can also make good directors.
Legends
I want him in season 5 of Lucifer!
He's already dead though on Lucifer
21pilots tillidie there has been talk that he will feature in a couple of episodes.. i dont know how they plan to do that
Fucking legend.
What happened to Christopha's New York Accent..?
You mean North New Jersey?
@@KunigasSuvirintojas what eva..!
Joey Diaz should of been on this podcast episode :(
Fuck no. Just Schirripa, he doesn't know when to stfu.
I DID. DENT. READ LINES
- Chrissy
[in this context]
Imagine being told how to do your job by a guy that knows nothing about how to do your job.
.
That's why. (Y)
Management everywhere in a nutshell
3:42 I'm dying XD
Some directors act first, though, i.e. Clint Eastwood.
@@Ogrematic I know, I'm one. It's another dimension of difference.
@North American UA-camr
Imagine being told how your job works by a guy that knows nothing about how your job works. LOL
never had the makings of a varsity athlete
Lime readings?
Phil leotardo did 20 years in the can!
wow, ill say!!!
FFS theyre making acting seem like splitting atoms. Christophah couldnt understand what means "make a comical face" ?? Its not that he didnt understand, its that he was being a pretentious arogant as5hat who felt he was better than that. He was after all PERFORMING as an ARTIST, as a THESPIAN and a true master of his craft. You dont just grimace or do physical labor. Who do they think theyre talking to. He cannot make some mere comical face, he explores and portrays the truth of his character from the deepest recesses of his being only to establish a mutual dialect and rapport with another thespian performing.
A comical face ?
*hand backwards gently on forehead*
"Ah....eh..."
Make a comical face isn’t direction. I think the emotion you want is the direction an actor wants. Same with the composer and stuff.