The forced insemination of cows is a real thing and...morally questionable. The guy's claim that you can get everything you need from a vegan diet is false (you need multiple types of protein, some of which are only in meat). Both are completely irrelevant to the abortion discussion, of course, and, I agree; this guy's take is insane, as all pro-abortion takes are if you examine them.
There's no hard and fast rules about why an animal, every non human animal's life, is necessarily less conscious and means less in the context of a human's life, extrapolating the human's life to the future as well. It's a debate, unlike what loudmouth Charlie Kirk decides is the end all be all solution. Also, afaik, there's no evidence to actually support eating soy causes androgynous features in males. Not to mention you don't NEED to eat soy to achieve a balanced vegan diet. So Charlie was being purely lazy towards the end of the debate and resorting to group think. He does have other good videos, like ones on why college is probably not a good investment for most people.
UA-cam comments are hardly the best place for a meaningful discussion that doesn't re-hash troped out modalities over this abortion vs meat eating ethics debate which has undoubtedly been explored in far more sophisticated terms, countless times.
They're eating the cows, drinking the milk
That boy needs to be on the watchlist
I totally agreed with u, like he didn’t even understand or know what he said.
The forced insemination of cows is a real thing and...morally questionable. The guy's claim that you can get everything you need from a vegan diet is false (you need multiple types of protein, some of which are only in meat).
Both are completely irrelevant to the abortion discussion, of course, and, I agree; this guy's take is insane, as all pro-abortion takes are if you examine them.
There's no hard and fast rules about why an animal, every non human animal's life, is necessarily less conscious and means less in the context of a human's life, extrapolating the human's life to the future as well. It's a debate, unlike what loudmouth Charlie Kirk decides is the end all be all solution. Also, afaik, there's no evidence to actually support eating soy causes androgynous features in males. Not to mention you don't NEED to eat soy to achieve a balanced vegan diet. So Charlie was being purely lazy towards the end of the debate and resorting to group think. He does have other good videos, like ones on why college is probably not a good investment for most people.
UA-cam comments are hardly the best place for a meaningful discussion that doesn't re-hash troped out modalities over this abortion vs meat eating ethics debate which has undoubtedly been explored in far more sophisticated terms, countless times.