The rise of Muslims coincided with an unprecedented political, social, economic, and military weakness in Persia. Once a major world power, the Sassanid Empire had exhausted its human and material resources after decades of warfare against the Byzantine Empire. The internal political situation quickly deteriorated after the execution of King Khosrow II in 628. Subsequently, ten new claimants were enthroned within the next four years.[3] Following the Sassanid Civil War of 628-632, the empire was no longer centralized.
ایکاش زود تر این ویدیو رو میدیدم.. تکمیلی : صحاح سته ( کتابهای مرجع پس از قران برای اهل تسنن ) تماما توسط ایرانیها نوشته شده... ( محمد بن اسماعیل بخاری . مسلم بن حجاج نیشابوری . احمد بن شعیب نسائی . ابوداوود سلیمان . ابوعیسی محمد ترمذی . محمد بن ماجه قزوینی . عجببببببب
Very interesting point of view. The fall of Sassanian Empire was direct result of crushing defeats in war with Byzantine Empire. (Which was the base for Khosrow II's trial). Referring to the size of the Empire before those defeats and trying to relate it to the stability of the Empire is not valid. Germany occupied almost all of Europe by 1943 but collapsed in 1945 completely. After defeats from Romans and execution of Khosrow II, the army did not fight Arabs up to its standards. (This is a fact) Also people did not raise any important resistance. How could 40,000 Arab invaders pass Zagros mountains and Persia (today Fars) safely? I would assume that Ghashghaeis, Kurds and Lurs should have cut them to pieces. When "Shah an Shah" failed to stop invaders, it was up to local Shahs to get the job done, so a sociopolitical system failed. But why? . Answering this question is very important because apparently history repeats itself: Invasion of Mongols, Allies invasion of 1941 and ....
درود و سپاس
پيج جناب اقاخانى رو لطف كنيد ممنون ميشم
🙏🏻🙏🏻☀️☀️🌺🌺
🙏🙏
The rise of Muslims coincided with an unprecedented political, social, economic, and military weakness in Persia. Once a major world power, the Sassanid Empire had exhausted its human and material resources after decades of warfare against the Byzantine Empire. The internal political situation quickly deteriorated after the execution of King Khosrow II in 628. Subsequently, ten new claimants were enthroned within the next four years.[3] Following the Sassanid Civil War of 628-632, the empire was no longer centralized.
اطلاعاتتان به روز نیست مغاک تیره تاریخ رو بخوان دکتر
رضاخانی هم مثل اناره تجدیدنظر طلبه اما معتدل تره. اونا رو هم میشناسه
ایکاش زود تر این ویدیو رو میدیدم.. تکمیلی : صحاح سته ( کتابهای مرجع پس از قران برای اهل تسنن ) تماما توسط ایرانیها نوشته شده... ( محمد بن اسماعیل بخاری . مسلم بن حجاج نیشابوری . احمد بن شعیب نسائی . ابوداوود سلیمان . ابوعیسی محمد ترمذی . محمد بن ماجه قزوینی . عجببببببب
جهان
آقای دکتر کاش چنین موضوع مهم و الظهر من الشمس را اینجور حاشا نمیکردید که وجهه خودت را خراب میکنی .به نظرم تجدید نظر کن
Very interesting point of view.
The fall of Sassanian Empire was direct result of crushing defeats in war with Byzantine Empire. (Which was the base for Khosrow II's trial). Referring to the size of the Empire before those defeats and trying to relate it to the stability of the Empire is not valid. Germany occupied almost all of Europe by 1943 but collapsed in 1945 completely.
After defeats from Romans and execution of Khosrow II, the army did not fight Arabs up to its standards. (This is a fact)
Also people did not raise any important resistance. How could 40,000 Arab invaders pass Zagros mountains and Persia (today Fars) safely? I would assume that Ghashghaeis, Kurds and Lurs should have cut them to pieces. When "Shah an Shah" failed to stop invaders, it was up to local Shahs to get the job done, so a sociopolitical system failed. But why? . Answering this question is very important because apparently history repeats itself: Invasion of Mongols, Allies invasion of 1941 and ....
تصادفا جناب دکتر هرچی میگه به نفع آخوندها است.
اینا هدف دارن برای اینکه جنایات مسلمانان را توجیه کنند واخرش بگن اصلا حمله نکردن اعراب
@@mostafashahhosini414
دقیقا👏👏👏
@@kavehkamrani3168 🤣🤣🤣💩🤲🤲🤲👅👅
بسیاااااار چرت و تلاش برای تحریف تاریخ و منحرف کردن اذهان عمومی
دکتر شروین وکیلی نیز،همین نظر را دارند عرستان جزو تمدنی ایرانی ست .
@@maryamhomayoun9197 درود بر شما
دستکم پنج کلیپ از ایشان گوش کردم.
روش علمی نیست
قبرش که در مداین است
این چه قیافه ای بود