How The Bolsheviks Seized Power in 1917 - Antony Beevor
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 тра 2024
- Watch the full thing here: • The Russian Revolution...
💥Join us on our Journey to 1 Million Subscribers💥
Join our exclusive TRIGGERnometry community on Locals! triggernometry.locals.com/
OR Support TRIGGERnometry Here:
Bitcoin: bc1qm6vvhduc6s3rvy8u76sllmrfpynfv94qw8p8d5
Music by: Music by: Xentric | info@xentricapc.com | www.xentricapc.com/ UA-cam: @xentricapc
Buy Merch Here:
www.triggerpod.co.uk/shop/
Advertise on TRIGGERnometry:
marketing@triggerpod.co.uk
Join the Mailing List:
www.triggerpod.co.uk/#mailing...
Find TRIGGERnometry on Social Media:
/ triggerpod
/ triggerpod
/ triggerpod
About TRIGGERnometry:
Stand-up comedians Konstantin Kisin (@konstantinkisin) and Francis Foster (@francisjfoster) make sense of politics, economics, free speech, AI, drug policy and WW3 with the help of presidential advisors, renowned economists, award-winning journalists, controversial writers, leading scientists and notorious comedians.
Subscribe for more!
I just started watching "We Were the Lucky Ones". It's hard to imagine the US or the UK falling in to such chaos so fast but WE could let that happen if we don't see the current Marxist revolution for what it is. They WILL NOT stop on their own.
I am thankful for the 2nd amendment.
@@smoketnt5290 There is a law against talking about Marxists? Nah! No way.
The UK is far more likely to collapse in a race war than this. The woke diversity agenda is just a cover for the neoliberals to plunder and rape our country. With the two party system not offering a solution on immigration and importing millions of 3rd worlders who hate each other and us and concentrating them in cities, conflict is inevitable
@@scillyautomatic
The MSM refuses to accept or even talk about how Marxism is permeating American culture. They even try to tell us that Antifa isn't a thing, that CRT is idea in law, even though the people, who support those beliefs, have written books telling us exactly how it will be put into practice in education, the media or other areas of life. The rules about misinformation is one of their weapons. They get to decide what's true and they'll shut up anyone who strays from their truth. It's being presented that rules, for what they call misinformation, is good for the stability of the country. They make it sound nice but it's as insidious as it gets.
@@smoketnt5290
Sure Marxism is quite literally invented by a Jewish man but they're atheist Communist Jews not secular/religious Zionist Jews, did you think that all these Jewish victims of Communism are fake? Fellow 'Jews' have tried to destroy Judaism & their national identity to force them into collective society, and you think Jewish people are monolith with one goal and aspiration for 'something'.
I was a bit distracted by the beautiful background - but I still managed to notice a scary number of parallels with today
Yes scary ..the planet has descended into a place where there is chaos and too many bad players …communists ( far left) getting into bed with Islamists..it’s going to be tough and we need to look for truth and integrity but sometimes the evil powers are too strong for a while.
How many "documentaries" and films etc about Soviet, and how many about Nazi Germany does BBC show?
1 to 500?
True
"Conditions are bad, but there is no famine." --Walter Duranty of the New York Times describing widespread famine in the USSR.
"The Kampuchean revolution will appear more and more clearly as one of the most significant early indications of the great and necessary change beginning to convulse the world in the later 20th century." --Malcolm Caldwell, contributor to the London Times, covering the Cambodian genocide.
Never underestimate the urge of many "intellectuals" to keep the utopian promise of socialism alive.
Exactly. "I am literally a communist' should provoke hisses not applause.
@@elkpaz560 Amen
Do you know how the author of
"The Archipel Gulag"
referred to the Bolshevik perpetrators ?
Are you aware of who was at the helm of mass newspapers back in those dreadful times and in today's dystopia ?
Can you connect the dots ?
Here's a hint: Kisin is one of those people.
"Having shaved their beards and fled to Helsinki in disguise, it looked as if the Bolsheviks were Finnish"
Only Lenin could've passed as a Finn, the rest: nah.
@@WarmProp Perekele!
@@WarmProp Hooked noses and all.....
6.12.1917 🇫🇮
@@pretorious700 I mean, just earlobes would have given them away
In 1903, portions of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were serialized in a Russian newspaper, Znamya (The Banner). The version of the Protocols that has endured and has been translated into dozens of languages, however, was first published in Russia in 1905 as an appendix to The Great in the Small: The Coming of the Anti-Christ and the Rule of Satan on Earth, by Russian writer and mystic Sergei Nilus.
Déjà vu anyone?
History question... Which Austrian painter fought against the rise of the bolsheviks and communists?
Great question - & another, the rulers of which countries made alliance with them? - & gave them Poland, while pretending Polish sovereignty was the reason for declaring the 2nd conflict?
Carl Moll
And the Bolsheviks were started by which group of people?
Joos
the vast majority were russian orthodox
Translation: "who can we justify racism against"? Sorry but you can't justify racism and disrespect towards me
Thought they were Jewish,is this wrong or right
@@CharlesKenwright Some were. But the vast majority of people and leadership were russian orthodox.
There were much more jews in the Bolshivks enemies - the Menshevik
This brought back all the Russian history I learned at GCSE and A Level in the 90s. I actually knew what he was talking about, I am impressed with myself.
I always thought KK and FF were Boleviks excepts for the Carbonaras and Martinis.
Bill Wittle just did an amazing 8 part breakdown of the Russian Revolution and its fallout. Really drives you mad how easily that murderous regime could have been stopped.
*Whittle
Lenin did see the danger of the bureacratised state,this is why in the trade union discussion in the party in 1920 he argued that the unions should remain independent of party and state in case the party should become dictatorial..It was actually Trotsky who initially opposed this view ..If Lenin had lived longer then Stalinist style dictatorship may not have developed..Stalin like Mao was a former gangster,unlike the rest of the party leadership,blackmailing and bullying his way to the top..Churchill said that the two greatest tragedies to befall Russia was firstly Lenin's birth and secondly his death..
Lenin literally and deliberately eliminated any true political life in Russia, first outside the Bolshevik Party and later within it. It was he who banned factional fighting within the party (In 1921), de facto formally eliminating any possibility of non-despotic power within the party structures and creating a tool that Stalin later used with skill.
He was also a skilled cynic and genius politician and knew when and how to temper his actions, which is why we can find moments when he was actually less radical than those around him.
@@piop Lenin didn't do it,the whole party representatives voted on it at the 10th party congress in 1921,the wording of the resolution suggesting it as a temporary measure due to the Kronstat rebellion and famine..Large factions on both left and right led by Trotsky and Bukharin continued to argue openly within the party til 1927 long after Lenin died..To claim a Lenin simply led to a Stalin is stretching it to say the least..I doubt Lenin would have caused the Holodomor signed a Lenin Hitler pact,invaded Finland or been caught with his pants down by the Germans..A wise dictator knows it is more important to make friends than kill enemies..And history does not regard such men as despots..Napoleon and Hitler were both dictators but I know who I would prefer to live under..
@@eddiemilne4989 This is an argument from a formalist perspective, in contradiction of what the mechanism of exercising power in the Bolshevik Party actually looked like, free political play (which, actually took place to some extent in the times of the party in exile) was a thing of the past, the ban took place because it was Lenin's decision. At that moment, the power over the party was firmly in his hands (and his supporters). Of course, informal infighting still took place, it always takes place in human organizations. However, this ban was later used by Stalin and was also an expression of Lenin's intentions. The attempt to present Lenin as a person who did not have totalitarian ambitions and did not commit massive social and political purges (genocides basically) contradicts an overwhelming amount of historical testimonies and documents. Using your phraseology Lenin was a Hitleresque figure, not a Napoleonic.
Luis Buñuel once said that if the Bolshevik revolution happened in 1917 in some South American country, it would be all over in less than 5 years. In Russia everything _takes time..._
Imagine if you were a common person in 1917 Russia...some fiery orator talking about removing Russia from the war and giving the people the means of production probably sounded amazing.
As a common person in 1917 Russia you were illiterate and lived in a hut without electricity and indoor plumbing. Any promise of free stuff sounded amazing.
@@pawelpap9 Right! Plus good chance either you or a relative were in the war, so the promise of having that end sounded great also.
What puzzles me is the bolsheviks were the IIRC extreme form of Socialism in the civil war so still surprised they won.
A monarchy by any other name
What a tour de force.
Fascinating!
In US we may need to start talking Succession
Wait, what demographic was the Bolsheviks?
Found the Nazi.
Satan's Chosen Lunatics.
Middle-class intellectuals.
Human
Subscriber with material alert
Kamenov was initially in charge after the Czar abdicated, then they seized power.
"Mmm, Ahhh, ahhhhhhh..."
Most people never mention how close britian was to a communist revolution after ww1 with the creation of labour
What ethnicity made up the overwhelming percentage of the Bolsheviks Konstantin?
Those that are creating LAWS against NOTICING THEIR EVIL
Believe it was 75% of the bolsheviks administration
Russians lol and not juice
Human, they were all ethnically human.
"Twenty-two percent of Bolsheviks were gentry (1.7% of the total population) and 38% were uprooted peasants; compared with 19% and 26% for the Mensheviks. In 1907, 78.3% of the Bolsheviks were Russian and 10% were Jewish; compared to 34% and 20% for the Mensheviks' (google)
Chomsky ?!? ua-cam.com/video/wpeKZUKlkSA/v-deo.html 😁 (I know he meant Trotzki, but still it sounds a bit like our "favourite" left wing linguist)
Trotsky, Chomsky same same but different
This comments section says it all, even Constantine would be appalled at his followers.
I should have known better and realize that discussion of Bolshevik Revolution would be a rally cry for antisemitism of all creeds. Kind of disgusting, but not surprising.
I'd love to listen to this guy but the amount of umming and ahhing he does is maddening.
Can’t say it eh?
Bolsheviks are/were revolutionary folk, mainly Jewish.
Know your history people.
Can you prove that....
The Holodomor (Starvation of 20 million White Ukrainians) happened under Jewish rule. The revolution was also heavily funded by wallstreet bankers like Jacob Schiff.
Stalin managed to purge the jewish influence and implemented 'Socialism in one country', contrary to Trotyskyism. Many of the jews had fled to the USA by the 50s, remodelling their anti-white plans for the Neo-Liberal system we live under today.
So what are you implying?
@@theinngu5560
They say you can take a monkey out of the jungle, but you can’t take the…something something…
@sydmccreath4554 go on then prove it
🐜 ant beever 🦫
“BoLsHeViK” ✡️
You lost me
Another biased view on Lenin and revolution. Why do you call the intentions as lies? were they not performed after the revolution? If those would have not happened the majority of people would not have fought for the Soviet's power.
Today more and more people are interested in the Soviet experiment and of course more people try to say their view on what is important to the world event. It is much better just to read what Lenin himself wrote. You will get a clear picture of the circumstances. NO need to rely on somebody's opinion.
No its not because he lie on his writings and do whole lot of things differently than he wrote
Aaaaahhhhh every 3 words, Jesus Christ, this is unbearable. Better to read him then to hear him give interviews. You think he should be fluid being English his first language and him being an expert on the matter BUT NO
NAME NATIONALITY
Dzerjinski (president) Pole
Peters (vice-president) Lett
Chklovski Jew
Kheifiss Jew
Zeistine Jew
Razmirovitch Jew
Kronberg Jew
Khaikina Jewess
Karlson Lett
Schaumann Jew
Leontovitch Jew
Jacob Goldine Jew
Glaperstein Jew
Kniggisen Jew
Latzis Lett
Schillenkuss Jew
Janson Lett
Rivkine Jew
Antonof Russian
Delafabre Jew
Tsitkine Jew
Roskirovitch Jew
G. Sverdlof Jew
Biesenski Jew
Blioumkine Jew
Alexandrevitch Russian
I. Model Jew
Routenberg Jew
Pines Jew
Sachs Jew
Daybol Lett
Saissoune Armenian
Deylkenen Lett
Liebert Jew
Vogel German
Zakiss Lett
"You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They h8ted Russians. They h8ted Christians. Driven by ethnic h8tred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators."
-Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Thank you for that timely reminder. Just when we were beginning to believe the real threat to the Jews was now coming from the left you've reminded us that the right have always lead the charge.
My great grandparents left "The Russian Pale of Settlement" in the 1880s, very grateful they did, otherwise they would have been on this list, too, and for very good reason.
Based!!!
In 1903, portions of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were serialized in a Russian newspaper, Znamya (The Banner). The version of the Protocols that has endured and has been translated into dozens of languages, however, was first published in Russia in 1905 as an appendix to The Great in the Small: The Coming of the Anti-Christ and the Rule of Satan on Earth, by Russian writer and mystic Sergei Nilus.
Nice woke logic. Their race doesn't matter.