Okay, so when you're wanting to do videos related to paleontology, you have to keep in mind that paleontologists work closely with paleoartists to reconstruct and flesh out the fossils they find and study. Using AI not only poorly reconstructs these long extinct animals, but is also spitting in the faces of paleoartists who put their time and soul into making these beautiful pieces of art that you happen to display in your video. So if you can, please be considerate, and not use AI imagery when posting paleontology videos.
Do you think that a computer can learn to reconstruction just as well if not better than people, or study off of what paleoartists have done and then work off of that?
Not with current technology, but the main issue is that it destroys a lot of artists’ livelihoods that depend on revenue from commissions, not to mention many programs use other people’s art as templates without the original creator’s knowledge or consent.
Great info and I look forward to more, but as some have noticed the dates are off or wrong. I’m sure it was just a mistake but the correct info is that the newly-identified species, Tyrannosaurus mcraeensis, lived between 71 and 73 million years ago, or between 5 and 7 million years before T. rex. 64 million been the mass extinction event. As for the 62 million I’m not sure what creatures were thriving at the time but wasn’t the above-mentioned.
My nephew says his favorite is Tyrannosaurus Mcraensis. We were shocked to learn of a new Tyrannosaur. I thought the armor on the new Ankylosaur was pretty awesome.
Dinos where in every part of the planet, for 150 M of years, we know the 1% of them, we will keep discovering new ones every day, it's a never ending adventure.
You get a subscriber in me. Beautiful video this. I love all these dinosaurs you mentioned. I loved the explanation you gave to estimate the age of a dino. Awesome 😎
I haven't seen this proposed anywhere yet: Might the strong bony structures (horn protrusions included) on Tyrannosaur faces been a direct response to the Ceratopsians? Yes, ideally one would ambush a ceratopsian to avoid the head armor. Also yes, because T-saurs had their own head armor they could engage in pecking order face-biting. But neither of those preclude an increased survival if a T-saur had to parry C-sian strikes with its face in order to get a good bite. So if the ambush failed, just fight with your head and mouth like a hippopotamus. Big teeth, lots of armor and armament up front to protect the rib cage. No threat of a horn penetrating the nasal area of a T-saur even from a Triceratops, etc. If one can withstand face biting from another T-saur, it can withstand at least a glancing horn blow. Even if just to get clear for the next ambush. I'm still operating under the rule that even though predators don't win every hunt, they also don't die every other hunt. If the situation becomes unfavorable, most predators disengage. Wounds heal, predators survive. For some reason many paleontologists but ceratopsians (prey) on equal footing with tyrannosaurs (predators), which doesn't really work if a T-saur is to live to be 30 years old, ate another big dinosaur weekly, and simultaneously died 50% of all hunts now does it?
That's an interesting idea! It might fall into the realm of possibilities as far as their skull biomechanics, but I don't think it would be likely for their ecology just because leading with their head would be a very dangerous gambit. They may not have even needed to parry with their heads since they had very high rotational inertia for a theropod; they would have been easily able to dodge and slip Triceratops charges without having to engage with their head. But they definitely would have been a resilient hunter, and I think they could've handled more resistance from prey like Triceratops
@@dailydinoguy Or in combination with the agility. Typically in martial arts you don't just dodge so long as the opponent is still engaged since they have been given no reason to disengage: you dodge-grab, dodge-push or dodge-strike. We know there are bite marks on horns and frills of the ceratopsians, but that ambush is typically Plan A for predators, so maybe the biting the frill and the tyrannosaur head armor helped slap some sense into an opponent that this isn't going anywhere when the ambush fails and encouraged a reset for the next day when they meet again. Naturally it's all just food for thought / theory. Thanks for the response. Cheers.
Okay... 1) T-Macraeensis didn't live 62 MYA. Why am I so strict you may ask. Because 66 MYA there was a rock... Chixulub impactor to be precise. It hit the ground and thrugh few hundred years dinosaurs were wiped out. Well, 62 is less than 66 isn't it? It is. But the point is that it is BC, so -62 > -66. 62 MYA there were mammals taking place on top of the foodchain.
the tyrannosaurs used their head-hornlets (and their increasing bulk) to butt into prey dinosaurs, potentially breaking a rib or two, or stunning/laming a prey dino.
You said that T. Mcraensis lived before T-Rex and lived 62,000,000 years ago. You’re contradicting yourself, since T. Mcraensis lived 62,000,000 years ago, that means the dinosaur lived after T-Rex.
eoneophron - it does look like a chicken according to this rendering. it also looks like a couple of different animals stuck together - like those mythical beasties in the medieval ages. anyway, i love it :)😋🐓🌷🌱
Do you think the t-rex had short feathers on its little forearm bones? That could help it when it jumps and so it can flail out its legs to kick something. Biting was probably just use for eating, but I think to attack they kicked, but thats just a theory I have lol
We don't have any direct evidence that T. rex had feathers, but it's relatives did (ex. Yutyrannus) so maybe it did have feathers! Although these feathers may have been very small compared to their body
Yeah, the dinos were gone by 62 mya...or at least that's what is currently believed based on dating. I don't think the world would have been a terribly hospitable place...probably took more than 4 million years to recover from asteroid / volcanic traps / all of the above.
Wasn't the Chicxulub impact 66 million years ago? How can this new T. Rex have lived 62 million years ago? And at the beginning you said it lived before T. Rex. Sounds like it lived 70 million years ago.
I have had several strokes plus dementia so I am not "on the ball" anymore. Can someone explain to me why T. Macrae is considered a different species when it seems to have very minor cosmetic differences from T. rex? It seems to me there are more differences between Caucasian/Black/Asian humans and they are considered different races not species.
Good question! They are very similar. But the slender jaw and smaller horns are significantly different than the average T. rex, therefore, it warrants a new species. T. rex does have quite a bit of individual variation, but the differences in this new species are greater than that variation
So the Dinosaurs went extinct 65 or 66 MYA, I have seen both times put forth. But this Dino lived 62 MYA? This guy is supposed to be a Scientist, so a mistake of that magnitude is inexcusable. It might be different if he were a talking head journalist reading from a script. No subscription from me.
So awesome to use AI to bring these creatures to life! Too many times we see scientists allowing their own biases and limited knowledge guide their conclusions. Using AI is a genius move and will absolutely drive things forward and innovate the field!
No it is not. Those reconstructions look nothing like real species (they look closer to Fantasy Art/ARK models which is probably what was drawn from as a reference template). The fundamental issue with AI is that their system of decision making 1) in moving to reach the prescribed ‘goal,’ will not take into account the countless unspoken considerations/limitations that a conscious thinker would, and hence for many especially complex tasks it will often come to blatantly wrong/bizarre conclusions (e.g. all the bizarre answers the Google AI has been coming up with) and 2) is often so complex that not even its original creators know what its logic was in coming to the conclusions that it did, making correcting these problems enormously difficult. To say nothing of the people whose livelihoods as artists depend on commissions. It is a very impressive technology that has a lot of possible applications but to slash jobs/be lazy a lot of companies/consumers are trying to use it to replace jobs/tasks that it cannot perform effectively and we are starting to see the consequences of this.
And why doesn’t this have more views?!!??
Gotta spread the word!
How about the "Likes"? You do a nice job. I think you deserve more of those too.
Because it has ai bs in it!
Thank you! DDG love how informative your show is. Appreciate the knowledge. My favorite dinosaur is T McCrae Enis.
Thanks for watching! I'm so glad you love it!
Okay, so when you're wanting to do videos related to paleontology, you have to keep in mind that paleontologists work closely with paleoartists to reconstruct and flesh out the fossils they find and study. Using AI not only poorly reconstructs these long extinct animals, but is also spitting in the faces of paleoartists who put their time and soul into making these beautiful pieces of art that you happen to display in your video. So if you can, please be considerate, and not use AI imagery when posting paleontology videos.
Do you think that a computer can learn to reconstruction just as well if not better than people, or study off of what paleoartists have done and then work off of that?
Not with current technology, but the main issue is that it destroys a lot of artists’ livelihoods that depend on revenue from commissions, not to mention many programs use other people’s art as templates without the original creator’s knowledge or consent.
He lost me when he asked what everyone's favirite dinosaur is.
@@isaiahheaton9177No. Art is made by humans, not machines.
As an artist, THANK YOU. THIS IS STEALING PEOPLES JOBS.
Glad I found your channel. I’m a professional pilot. I should have become a Paleontologist. I’m 59 and still learning about dinosaurs.
62 million years ago? So 4 million years after all the dinosaurs went extinct?
You catch the mistake.....♠
Estimates dating the rock formation vary a little, but he may mean 72 million years. Or they had a TARDIS. One or the other.
I believe dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago, so that would be 3 million years after.
To add, large Sauropods were not part of T-Rex's ecosystem
How can you make a mistake like that?
Excellent presentation. I would still go with #1. I have a few fossils and have a T-Rex tooth tip from the Hell Creek formation.
I mean, how could you not love more Tyrannosaurs?
I absolutely love learning about dinosaurs and find them incredibly fascinating.
Then you came to the right channel!
I was all about "walking with dinosaurs" when I was a kid. Thanks for the reply!
Very cool! Good stuff very informative
Thank you, this is my favorite comment🫶🏼
Great info and I look forward to more, but as some have noticed the dates are off or wrong. I’m sure it was just a mistake but the correct info is that the newly-identified species, Tyrannosaurus mcraeensis, lived between 71 and 73 million years ago, or between 5 and 7 million years before T. rex.
64 million been the mass extinction event.
As for the 62 million I’m not sure what creatures were thriving at the time but wasn’t the above-mentioned.
My nephew says his favorite is Tyrannosaurus Mcraensis. We were shocked to learn of a new Tyrannosaur. I thought the armor on the new Ankylosaur was pretty awesome.
That's probably my favorite one too!
Found you from instagram! Great stuff! ❤
Thanks! Glad you liked it!
You deserve more views and i have subscribed
Thank you!
how did the "new" Tyrannosaur live 62 million years ago if nonavian dinosaurs went extinct 66 million years ago?
dinosaurs make me happy 🙂
Dinos where in every part of the planet, for 150 M of years, we know the 1% of them, we will keep discovering new ones every day, it's a never ending adventure.
You get a subscriber in me. Beautiful video this. I love all these dinosaurs you mentioned. I loved the explanation you gave to estimate the age of a dino. Awesome 😎
Awesome! Thank you!
I haven't seen this proposed anywhere yet: Might the strong bony structures (horn protrusions included) on Tyrannosaur faces been a direct response to the Ceratopsians? Yes, ideally one would ambush a ceratopsian to avoid the head armor. Also yes, because T-saurs had their own head armor they could engage in pecking order face-biting.
But neither of those preclude an increased survival if a T-saur had to parry C-sian strikes with its face in order to get a good bite. So if the ambush failed, just fight with your head and mouth like a hippopotamus. Big teeth, lots of armor and armament up front to protect the rib cage. No threat of a horn penetrating the nasal area of a T-saur even from a Triceratops, etc. If one can withstand face biting from another T-saur, it can withstand at least a glancing horn blow. Even if just to get clear for the next ambush.
I'm still operating under the rule that even though predators don't win every hunt, they also don't die every other hunt. If the situation becomes unfavorable, most predators disengage. Wounds heal, predators survive. For some reason many paleontologists but ceratopsians (prey) on equal footing with tyrannosaurs (predators), which doesn't really work if a T-saur is to live to be 30 years old, ate another big dinosaur weekly, and simultaneously died 50% of all hunts now does it?
That's an interesting idea! It might fall into the realm of possibilities as far as their skull biomechanics, but I don't think it would be likely for their ecology just because leading with their head would be a very dangerous gambit. They may not have even needed to parry with their heads since they had very high rotational inertia for a theropod; they would have been easily able to dodge and slip Triceratops charges without having to engage with their head. But they definitely would have been a resilient hunter, and I think they could've handled more resistance from prey like Triceratops
@@dailydinoguy Or in combination with the agility. Typically in martial arts you don't just dodge so long as the opponent is still engaged since they have been given no reason to disengage: you dodge-grab, dodge-push or dodge-strike. We know there are bite marks on horns and frills of the ceratopsians, but that ambush is typically Plan A for predators, so maybe the biting the frill and the tyrannosaur head armor helped slap some sense into an opponent that this isn't going anywhere when the ambush fails and encouraged a reset for the next day when they meet again.
Naturally it's all just food for thought / theory.
Thanks for the response. Cheers.
You had me at dino guy!
Subscribed! 🦕🦖
Thank you!
Okay... 1) T-Macraeensis didn't live 62 MYA. Why am I so strict you may ask. Because 66 MYA there was a rock... Chixulub impactor to be precise. It hit the ground and thrugh few hundred years dinosaurs were wiped out. Well, 62 is less than 66 isn't it? It is. But the point is that it is BC, so -62 > -66. 62 MYA there were mammals taking place on top of the foodchain.
totally Right...♠
is your job being a dinosaur guy fulltime? if so thats very cool! i hope you find many and make some cool documentaries.
Unfortunately it is not my full-time job. But hopefully, one day, it will be!
Neet discoveries can’t wait to hopefully have figures of those dinosaurs in my collection one day however i differ on the time line 😂
That last part about the titanosaurs describes why titanosaurs were so big and successful near the end times....
Pretty sure 62mya the non-avian dinosaurs were extinct. Yeah, I'm certain of it.
You do realize using Ai for dinosaurs is a treason against the paleontology community but hey , this is pretty good
It's interesting how some fans of dinosaurs really want them to look like birds.
the tyrannosaurs used their head-hornlets (and their increasing bulk) to butt into prey dinosaurs, potentially breaking a rib or two, or stunning/laming a prey dino.
You said that T. Mcraensis lived before T-Rex and lived 62,000,000 years ago. You’re contradicting yourself, since T. Mcraensis lived 62,000,000 years ago, that means the dinosaur lived after T-Rex.
i think he mean 72 million
Didn’t T-Rex live 65-66M yrs ago.
What AI is everyone talking about? The thumbnail?
i thought dinosaurs died out 66 million years ago.
If if Mcraensis lived 62 million years ago it would live 4 million years after T Rex not before.
First fact - So it's a Tyrannasaurus Rocks :p
eoneophron - it does look like a chicken according to this rendering. it also looks like a couple of different animals stuck together - like those mythical beasties in the medieval ages. anyway, i love it :)😋🐓🌷🌱
It does!
Algo! Cheers for the video. ^^
Thank you! Glad you liked it!
Do you think the t-rex had short feathers on its little forearm bones? That could help it when it jumps and so it can flail out its legs to kick something. Biting was probably just use for eating, but I think to attack they kicked, but thats just a theory I have lol
We don't have any direct evidence that T. rex had feathers, but it's relatives did (ex. Yutyrannus) so maybe it did have feathers! Although these feathers may have been very small compared to their body
And wait you said 62 Mya 🤦🤨isn’t it 78 Mya or something like that ???
Has to be So.
Yeah, the dinos were gone by 62 mya...or at least that's what is currently believed based on dating. I don't think the world would have been a terribly hospitable place...probably took more than 4 million years to recover from asteroid / volcanic traps / all of the above.
Sorry, can’t do the music
When discovering a sub species how do people know that they are different from their counterparts and not just a juvenile or mutations.
very excellent presentation and you have a great voice for it, too. :)🦜🦕🦖🌷🌱
Thank you!
we found more dinosaurs.. what are they a tyrannosaurus and a stegosaurus.
Bussin
Gory
Titan
The dinos were extinct 62 million years ago, I think you meant 70"
Wasn't the Chicxulub impact 66 million years ago? How can this new T. Rex have lived 62 million years ago? And at the beginning you said it lived before T. Rex. Sounds like it lived 70 million years ago.
I wanted to watch this video, but that AI image is discouraging
Bro uses ai art for his videos instead of actual hood paleo art
I think the chinese just been slacking on paleo
62 million year old dinosaur? Oh dear................
I have had several strokes plus dementia so I am not "on the ball" anymore. Can someone explain to me why T. Macrae is considered a different species when it seems to have very minor cosmetic differences from T. rex? It seems to me there are more differences between Caucasian/Black/Asian humans and they are considered different races not species.
Good question! They are very similar. But the slender jaw and smaller horns are significantly different than the average T. rex, therefore, it warrants a new species. T. rex does have quite a bit of individual variation, but the differences in this new species are greater than that variation
Relativity.
I LIKE CARNOTAURUS
Please never use AI art. It's scientific misinfo.
Nice AI thumbnail genius.
Thanks!
@@dailydinoguyYou know this is sarcams, don't you?
#+ Datai
It's a pretty cool one!
@@dailydinoguy 😁
So the Dinosaurs went extinct 65 or 66 MYA, I have seen both times put forth. But this Dino lived 62 MYA? This guy is supposed to be a Scientist, so a mistake of that magnitude is inexcusable. It might be different if he were a talking head journalist reading from a script. No subscription from me.
Please never use AI-created dinosaurs again if you want to be taken seriously.
Dinosaurs didn't really exist 😢
So awesome to use AI to bring these creatures to life! Too many times we see scientists allowing their own biases and limited knowledge guide their conclusions. Using AI is a genius move and will absolutely drive things forward and innovate the field!
Have you a like for your comment but mostly for your name 😁
No it is not. Those reconstructions look nothing like real species (they look closer to Fantasy Art/ARK models which is probably what was drawn from as a reference template).
The fundamental issue with AI is that their system of decision making 1) in moving to reach the prescribed ‘goal,’ will not take into account the countless unspoken considerations/limitations that a conscious thinker would, and hence for many especially complex tasks it will often come to blatantly wrong/bizarre conclusions (e.g. all the bizarre answers the Google AI has been coming up with) and 2) is often so complex that not even its original creators know what its logic was in coming to the conclusions that it did, making correcting these problems enormously difficult. To say nothing of the people whose livelihoods as artists depend on commissions.
It is a very impressive technology that has a lot of possible applications but to slash jobs/be lazy a lot of companies/consumers are trying to use it to replace jobs/tasks that it cannot perform effectively and we are starting to see the consequences of this.