'What Do You Mean By That?': Graham Questions Jackson On Gitmo Detainee Defense

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 156

  • @marctompkins3001
    @marctompkins3001 2 роки тому +58

    If this is the lefts cream of the crop, I nominate Judge Jeanine Pirro

    • @leavemyhandlealone321
      @leavemyhandlealone321 2 роки тому +7

      And I'll second that💥🇺🇸👍

    • @kirkdubois8898
      @kirkdubois8898 2 роки тому

      Yeah, our nominee only has 9 years as a federal judge..that more than Thomas, Barrett and Roberts combined, and flat out has more experience than any Surpreme Court Judge... of course you guys like to set the bar low and you think no experience is a smart plan....is that Republican ex President still claming the 2020 election was rigged ?...so smart...I guess if you guys hate her we are doing something right for this country.
      "EDUCATION IN PUBLIC SCHOOL
      Jackson
      Alito
      Kagan
      If confirmed, Jackson would join Justices Samuel A. Alito Jr. and Elena Kagan as the only justices who attended public high schools. (Justice Stephen G. Breyer, who Jackson would replace, also attended public high school.)
      Almost every sitting justice studied law at one of two elite universities: Four at Harvard Law and another four at Yale Law. Jackson also graduated from Harvard.
      IVY LEAGUE GRADUATES
      Harvard Law School
      Jackson
      Breyer
      Roberts
      Kagan
      Gorsuch
      Yale Law School
      Thomas
      Alito
      Sotomayor
      Kavanaugh
      Many of the justices have Harvard ties beyond attending the school. Kagan spent six years as dean until 2009. Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh was paid to teach at Harvard before his bruising confirmation process elicited protests from hundreds of graduates.
      [Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Harvard ties raise recusal questions in Supreme Court’s affirmative action case]
      Overall, more than a half of the justices confirmed to the Supreme Court since 1950 earned a degree from an Ivy League school, according to Federal Judicial Center data.
      CLERKED FOR A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE
      Jackson
      Breyer
      Roberts
      Kagan
      Gorsuch
      Kavanaugh
      Barrett
      Law clerks act as assistants and counselors to judges, conducting legal research, preparing memos, drafting and proofreading orders and opinions, among other things.
      Clerking for a Supreme Court justice is the starting point for 1 in 3 of the justices confirmed since 1950, including six of the nine current justices.
      That would be the case for Jackson, too, who went on to work as a law clerk for three federal judges, including Breyer in 1999.
      Alito did not clerk for a Supreme Court justice but he began his career clerking in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
      EXPERIENCE AS A PUBLIC DEFENDER
      Jackson
      If confirmed, Jackson will be the first justice with experience as a federal public defender and the first one since Justice Thurgood Marshall with significant experience as a criminal defense attorney on behalf of poor defend­ants.
      Marshall, the first Black Supreme Court justice, founded the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund in 1940 and worked within the legal system to improve rights for minorities. Jackson worked at the federal public defender’s office in D.C. for 2½ years representing indigent clients in criminal cases and detainees held at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
      “What judges see is often shaped by the experiences that they had,” said Alicia Bannon, director of the Brennan Center for Justice’s Judiciary Program. “Having to navigate the criminal justice system on behalf of poor defendants gives a judge an important perspective on how the criminal justice system operates and on the potential unfairness or hurdles within it.”
      Federal judges with public defender exper­i­ence are less rep­res­en­ted on federal and state courts, in favor of those with prosec­utorial and corpor­ate experience.
      According to Bannon, the nomination of Jackson shows that President Biden is “consistent” with his commitment to bring greater professional diversity to the federal judiciary. “We have seen a much higher incidence of people with public defender backgrounds or civil rights backgrounds being nominated to lower courts as well,” Bannon said.
      PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE IN THE
      SENTENCING COMMISSION
      Jackson
      Breyer
      If confirmed, Jackson will also be the only justice on the new court with experience on the U.S. Sentencing Commission - a bipartisan, independent agency created by Congress in 1984 to reduce disparity and promote transparency and proportionality in sentencing.
      Breyer is the only sitting justice with previous experience in the Sentencing Commission, where he served between 1985 and 1989. As an Obama appointee on the commission after stints at private law firms, Jackson helped rewrite guidelines to reduce recommended penalties for drug-related offenses.
      “Jackson’s public defense and Sentencing Commission experiences are going to be critical because they speak to her awareness of the other side of the criminal justice system,” said professor Steve Vladeck at the University of Texas School of Law.
      PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE AS FEDERAL JUDGES
      Court of Appeals
      Jackson
      Thomas
      Breyer
      Roberts
      Alito
      Sotomayor
      Gorsuch
      Kavanaugh
      Barrett
      Also District court
      Jackson
      Sotomayor
      Jackson and all sitting justices except for Kagan served as a federal judge before being nominated to the high court.
      But Jackson spent almost nine years as a federal district and appeals court judge - more than Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett, who each served less than three years before being nominated.
      'Ketanji Brown Jackson brings more experience as a judge than four of the current justices did combined at the time they joined the court,' said Vladeck."

  • @brandyweems8326
    @brandyweems8326 2 роки тому +2

    PLEASE don't let this evil woman be approved.

    • @halverde6373
      @halverde6373 2 роки тому +1

      Going to be a straight party vote. D's only.
      Any republican senators career would end if they vote for her.

  • @cozenmachine412
    @cozenmachine412 2 роки тому +19

    She's not a judge she's an activist.

    • @patriciarouse2801
      @patriciarouse2801 2 роки тому

      Cozen Machine needs studies time.
      Complexities are not simplistically.

  • @commonsense3502
    @commonsense3502 2 роки тому +5

    SCARY

  • @tommarinevet
    @tommarinevet 2 роки тому +18

    She doesn't belong on the bench as a judge anywhere with in the USA

  • @marybennett678
    @marybennett678 2 роки тому +20

    Does she think all the name dropping is going to impress us?? A typical politician! An attorney is free to refuse a case if they disagree with it.

  • @gamalwilliams6811
    @gamalwilliams6811 2 роки тому +20

    WICKED WOKE JACKSON CAN'T POSSIBLY BE A WOMAN BECAUSE TO DEFINE A WOMAN IS DIFFICULT

    • @unaffiliated0437
      @unaffiliated0437 2 роки тому

      especially for a bot such as yourself

    • @dabbyj509
      @dabbyj509 2 роки тому

      ♀️ 🚫 👠

    • @gamalwilliams6811
      @gamalwilliams6811 2 роки тому

      @@dabbyj509 SIMPLY IF YOU CAN'T DEFINE A WOMAN THEN YOU'RE A MAN BECAUSE A GENUINE WOMAN KNOWS THAT SHE KNOWS SHE'S A WOMAN COMPARED TO A MAN THAT APPARENTLY AND FUNCTIONALLY IS NOT

  • @eagleeye2300
    @eagleeye2300 2 роки тому +5

    God help us.

  • @bryanguilbeau5636
    @bryanguilbeau5636 2 роки тому +13

    Clueless!

  • @aaronamerica968
    @aaronamerica968 2 роки тому +20

    I propose that there be a man with a large wooden mallet present during these hearings. If a question is evaded, one bonk will be applied to the head of the interviewees.

    • @allen3784
      @allen3784 2 роки тому +5

      And that the man with the mallet wear an old tyme English wig!

    • @keithwilliams8342
      @keithwilliams8342 2 роки тому

      Just because you dont understand the answer doesnt mean ine wasnt given.

  • @EdwardCook53
    @EdwardCook53 2 роки тому +1

    This person should not be on our Supreme Court without a doubt.

  • @harleyvulcancobra4.619
    @harleyvulcancobra4.619 2 роки тому +6

    She would vote woke on every case if confirmed!

  • @susanwest8239
    @susanwest8239 2 роки тому +45

    I was a legal secretary for top attorneys and I can't believe her answers. I could have given better answers and I'm getting older. She's a hoot😂

    • @HealthyLife4Me
      @HealthyLife4Me 2 роки тому +1

      Same…which firm were you at?

    • @HealthyLife4Me
      @HealthyLife4Me 2 роки тому +2

      I would like to know why she left Moester & Forrester. She was there 2 years…that’s the timeframe when they ask you to leave if you aren’t a high achiever

    • @hemihead6645
      @hemihead6645 2 роки тому

      Has anyone seen Clarence Thomas, he seems to be missing? He's on the lam, hiding out from the Jan. 6th committee. We're going to impeach Thomas and appoint another Liberal judge to the Supreme Court.

    • @JoeJoe-go4vd
      @JoeJoe-go4vd 2 роки тому

      @@hemihead6645
      Dreamer, you know you are a dreamer
      Well can you put your hands in your head, oh no!
      I said dreamer, you're nothing but a dreamer
      Well can you put your hands in your head, oh no!
      I said "Far out, what a day, a year, a life it is!"
      You know, well you know you had it comin' to you
      Now there's not a lot I can do
      Dreamer, you stupid little dreamer
      So now you put your head in your hands, oh no!
      Wow!

    • @hemihead6645
      @hemihead6645 2 роки тому

      @@JoeJoe-go4vd
      Lol. Why are Republicans so corrupt? Who would have thought that a sitting Supreme Court judge would be involved with overthrowing Democracy in America. Face the facts, the GOP are the party of lawlessness and disorder.

  • @4speed3pedals
    @4speed3pedals 2 роки тому +4

    Being artificial intelligence, this woman can disconnect herself from any issue and judge fairly. This intelligence overrides her humanity. Yeah, she is pissing down our leg and telling us that it is raining. And that odor is pure bulls..t.

  • @jerimow8400
    @jerimow8400 2 роки тому +5

    That woman sure does understand how to kill time. I wonder if the avoidance is natural to her or if she had to study it in liberal college.

  • @halverde6373
    @halverde6373 2 роки тому +13

    Lindsay needs only to ask one question:
    What made you hate the party of Abraham Lincoln so much you chose to be a democrat?

    • @kirkdubois8898
      @kirkdubois8898 2 роки тому

      Well, lets see... after the civil war and Lincoln freeing the slaves, it still took 2 1/2 years to enforce it.
      "Juneteenth (short for “June Nineteenth”) marks the day when federal troops arrived in Galveston, Texas in 1865 to take control of the state and ensure that all enslaved people be freed. The troops’ arrival came a full two and a half years after the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation. Juneteenth honors the end to slavery in the United States and is considered the longest-running African American holiday. On June 17, 2021, it officially became a federal holiday."
      Over time the parties started to switch platforms(Did you know Republicans used to be for big govt?), where the southern democrats tried to create the dixiecrats with Strom Thurman in 1948. as a Presidential candidate ..and he was for segregation.
      Now we come to 1964 where Wallace and Johnson we in the Democratic Presidential Primary where Wallace promoted segregation and lost while Johnson got the 1964 civil rights bill passed...
      However, Goldwater won the Republican Primary for pushing for "states rights"...plus he voted against the 1964 civil rights bill....
      A better way to show how much you have moved farther right is by watching this clip(2min 50sec) that is showing Bush and Reagan 1980 Presidential Primary Debate when asked about illegal immigration. ua-cam.com/video/YsmgPp_nlok/v-deo.html
      And since more Republicans will fly a confederate flag at their home or on thier trucks than Dems, that sould be a big hint that it was not surprising that the party of Lincoln got more upset over a quiet kneel during the anthem than having unarmed citizens being killed by police. Things like that....

    • @halverde6373
      @halverde6373 2 роки тому

      @@kirkdubois8898 Leftist LIES.
      STOP LYING!

    • @halverde6373
      @halverde6373 2 роки тому

      @@kirkdubois8898 CLINTON/GORE Campaigned with the Confederate flag!
      That BS LIE of them changing parties is one of the biggest lies spewed by democrats who were the confederacy and to this day hate the republic!

    • @kirkdubois8898
      @kirkdubois8898 2 роки тому

      Well, then explain to me how most of the old confederate states are solid Republican states. The south started the Democratic party so since whites are still the majority in the south and blacks moved to the Democratic party then all the states should be a dark blue....but they are red(except for GA and no one could understand how Republicans lost the vote) white voters that are Republican or lean to the right make up 81% of the party, while whites just make up 59% of the Democratic party..
      David Duke endorsed Trump, and any self-proclaimed white supremacists or those that has ties to such organizations all ran as Republicans in 2018..
      I am not wrong... and this is almost common knowledge.

    • @halverde6373
      @halverde6373 2 роки тому

      @@kirkdubois8898 Easy. The southern democrats overran the once northern republican states. The north went to the south during reconstruction and that took generations. Know what a carpet bagger was? Wasn't a democrat.
      Took Texas nearly 130 years to become republican and they began as democrat.
      And they were still democrat leaning with the rinos like Perry. Abbott is a little more conservative but not by much.

  • @FakeNews_Ignored
    @FakeNews_Ignored 2 роки тому +2

    Bravo Graham!

  • @fredericksharon7494
    @fredericksharon7494 2 роки тому +3

    Sen. Graham should ask her if she is a woman... when she says "yes", then ask her how or what criteria she used to determine she was a woman... ??

  • @connieormond1045
    @connieormond1045 2 роки тому +10

    SHES IGNORANT...BUT..THOSE 2 LADIES BEHIND GRAHAM...🧐🤔😉🇺🇸

    • @Desert_Ov_Thee_Real
      @Desert_Ov_Thee_Real 2 роки тому +1

      Gramsgirls

    • @least_512
      @least_512 2 роки тому +3

      Trans man on the right ✅ lolz he's trying to hard to be feminine and it's a sure giveaway 😉

    • @connieormond1045
      @connieormond1045 2 роки тому

      @@least_512 😉😆😆EITHER WAY...GRAHAMS UNCOMFORTABLE AND THAT IT CANT ANSWER...LOVE THIS PART..😆💞

  • @sirleroyale4412
    @sirleroyale4412 2 роки тому +4

    Do she ever answer a question and seems a little spineless

  • @KeithCindyPanama
    @KeithCindyPanama 2 роки тому +12

    Politicians don’t need answers only to submit to handlers

    • @l3mr186
      @l3mr186 2 роки тому +1

      Like Clarence Thomas.

  • @bobkazzar6475
    @bobkazzar6475 2 роки тому +6

    why cant any of these people just say yes or no, hes not asking about your clients hes asking about you and your in the position to answer the question right now,

  • @martierickson7937
    @martierickson7937 2 роки тому +7

    Getting good, Graham mentions Law of War detention.. the storm is here

  • @ChristIsKing0919
    @ChristIsKing0919 2 роки тому +16

    The Bible's view on political correctness: "You adulterous people! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Therefore whoever wishes to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God " James 4:4. Let us repent and praise His righteousness standards. God bless~

    • @dotdashdotdash
      @dotdashdotdash 2 роки тому +3

      This woman, who can’t define what a woman is, defends p(edophiles with every ounce of her being).

    • @papawd3991
      @papawd3991 2 роки тому +3

      Amen

    • @Simpsons01111
      @Simpsons01111 2 роки тому +1

      Thomas Paine for shame! “The world is my country. All mankind are my brethren and to do good is my religion.” - Thomas Paine

    • @ChristIsKing0919
      @ChristIsKing0919 2 роки тому +1

      @@Simpsons01111 Peace be with you. Although Mr. Paine's accomplishments are admirable, his philosophy is not in harmony with the view of God.
      "*All* have turned away, they have together become worthless; there is no one who does good, not even one.” Rom 3:12
      Man's standards of "good" simply do not measure up in the eyes of a Holy God.
      But the good news is we have the hope of Jesus. God reveals if we believe in His Son we can be partakers of true Good; God alone! ☺️
      "For God made Christ, who never sinned, to be the offering for our sin, so that we could be made right with God through Christ." 2 Corinthians 5:21

  • @orangetuono38
    @orangetuono38 2 роки тому +4

    She has the memory of a Biden- I don't remember, I don't recall, perhaps, it wasn't my idea., I am not aware, ...

  • @jimmyjames9752
    @jimmyjames9752 2 роки тому +2

    C-SPAN SWAMP DEMOCRAT CONTROLLED FROM TOP TO BOTTOM INSIDE OUT

  • @mr.k6136
    @mr.k6136 2 роки тому +7

    How dare you ask her questions REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

  • @newguy2794
    @newguy2794 2 роки тому +5

    Blah, blah, blah....I'll keep talking but not tell you anything about my personal opinions of the laws or I'll simply blah, blah, blah without answering. I just circle around with bullshit.
    Vote no!

  • @kymburriss4260
    @kymburriss4260 2 роки тому +2

    Still can't give a straight answer...

  • @euronymous6998
    @euronymous6998 2 роки тому +1

    ACTIVIST!!!

  • @patriciahammett4197
    @patriciahammett4197 2 роки тому +15

    This is the best joe can do for the supreme court. Lord help us.

    • @b.t.3780
      @b.t.3780 2 роки тому +2

      Biden is just doing what Obama whispers in his ear for him to do.

    • @bigbob16
      @bigbob16 2 роки тому +2

      @@b.t.3780 Exactly

  • @petercristo992
    @petercristo992 2 роки тому +7

    This is getting interesting. I like the annual review of detainees part. This wasn't a mandatory brief it was an Amicus(friend of the Court) brief.

  • @petercristo992
    @petercristo992 2 роки тому +1

    Lara Trump would make a good Justice.

  • @andrewmacaulay9272
    @andrewmacaulay9272 2 роки тому +1

    THIS MAKES HER A LIAR FOR DEMS

  • @lambertsaldi1550
    @lambertsaldi1550 2 роки тому +1

    She is a Louse period folks!!

  • @miavos3610
    @miavos3610 2 роки тому +2

    What a laugh. Are we surprised?

  • @JUMBOpin
    @JUMBOpin 2 роки тому +7

    ::furled brow:: -internal voice- “Shit, I have to know this stuff?”

  • @lindadiaz3268
    @lindadiaz3268 2 роки тому +5

    Hum? I feel this judge isn't going to be confirmed, simply because she's not prepared to answer most of the simple questions she's given, mostly she's not sure how to answer, there's no disrespect on her behalf, it's like she's bait over a pool of sharks,

    • @bigbob16
      @bigbob16 2 роки тому +2

      She is backed by George Soros... Any democrat that votes against her will be punished by Nancy Pelosi... She could easily answer any one of those questions but she dare not go against the democrats agenda... She will just be another one of their puppets

  • @detlefvonkalben9577
    @detlefvonkalben9577 2 роки тому +1

    round and round and round we go till you run out of time

  • @codyallen9486
    @codyallen9486 2 роки тому +1

    She has said basically "it wasn't, me it was them" she is kinda losing it

  • @irene9263
    @irene9263 2 роки тому +2

    This judge person ( since it doesn't know what a real woman is ) obviously is very well educated in the field of law & practices of politics however, the judge is much more qualified to use a 100+ words of legal jargon to avoid or pass the answer over to Congress or change the whole question into a frigging CIRCUS scene

  • @timcarr4890
    @timcarr4890 2 роки тому +1

    This Hammer cannot wait, for some pipe to clean.

  • @donmaduro5262
    @donmaduro5262 2 роки тому

    The more she speaks the more I am convinced that she is not that bright

  • @roavalos941
    @roavalos941 2 роки тому

    Guilty

  • @cathiwalker3852
    @cathiwalker3852 2 роки тому

    Obviously, that thing knows Graham is a "friendly"
    She is not befuddled like in front of others.

  • @carolelerman9686
    @carolelerman9686 2 роки тому

    Her last name should be dodger.

  • @keithwilliams8342
    @keithwilliams8342 2 роки тому

    Is it me, or is Lindsay a bit condescending towards Jackson?
    Im a bit dissapointed in my fellow republicans.

  • @connieormond1045
    @connieormond1045 2 роки тому +2

    😆😆😆THAT MANS SAYS IT ALL IN HIS THOUGHTS...HE LIKE..OH SHT..PLEEEESE SHUT UP...OH DAMN...WOMAN..IF YOU DON'T HUSH...😆😆😆SEE HIS LIPS..😆😆😆

  • @kylewagner3052
    @kylewagner3052 2 роки тому

    She cant remember! Right.

  • @HavingCoffieWithMrSatan
    @HavingCoffieWithMrSatan 2 роки тому +2

    Mr satan REEEEE rules

  • @emmabolingo2661
    @emmabolingo2661 2 роки тому +6

    Graham is Career politicians. KLEPTOMANIAC

    • @FloridaPhoenix
      @FloridaPhoenix 2 роки тому

      Both sides have snakes that's for damn sure

  • @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807
    @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807 2 роки тому

    Is it criminal jurisdiction or military/administrative jurisdiction?

    • @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807
      @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807 2 роки тому

      ... or criminal within military/administrative jurisdiction? ...

    • @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807
      @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807 2 роки тому

      "The Supreme Court reversed his conviction, ruling that a law that seems fair on its face may be unconstitutional if it discriminates against a particular group of people."
      A Conversation on the Constitution: Judicial Interpretation Part 2 Volume 1
      "A very strong case that says that even though the law is valid or neutral, fair on it's face, 'if' in application, it's been applied in order to hurt a particular race, it's void. It's a tremendously powerful principle ... and why we're indebted ... to a Chinese National ... for going to the Supreme Court of the United States and establishing this very important doctrine."
      A Conversation on the Constitution: Judicial Interpretation Part 2 Volume 2
      (... link ...)
      (The Chinese Communist Party or the current Chinese Communist Party ruled China, can be distinguished, from an Australian with Chinese heritage or any person with a Chinese heritage ...
      in a similar way, WWII Nazis or WWII Nazis ruled Germany, can be distinguished, from an Australian with German heritage or any person with a German heritage ... )
      Nazism: "extreme racist or authoritarian views or behaviour." (Dictionary - Oxford Languages and Google)

    • @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807
      @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807 2 роки тому

      How did Senator Graham consider terrorists and war ... did it extend to war crime?

    • @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807
      @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807 2 роки тому

      A poignant paragraph or two or more:
      Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy visits HLS
      Published on October 27, 2015
      23: 40 min ... "and we don't pay any attention to it. Everybody thinks, well, we can leave it to the lawyers or the people in sociology or, but a), as you indicated, I think rightly, Dean, the thing is, I think it's everyones job, particularly, I think we have to step up ... and solitary confinement, is, people are in there for years.
      When I was in the Army, they gave us training, because I was in a unit that had combat ... training for it, and so they locked us up in a cell and some of us were tortured just very slightly, and after four hours in the cell I was going mad.
      These people have been, 40 days, 40 months, 20 years, in solitary confinement, it drives men mad, and we don't even think about it." The Honorable Anthony M. Kennedy
      24:52 min ... "and in California, the cost per prisoner is about thirty five thousand a year per prisoner, and the prison guards association, the correctional officers association, is the strongest lobby in the state of California, and they have planned prisons to go up the central valley, in the northern valley, in small towns, so that the prison guards are a large part of the population and they can control who's legislator, who's elected and they are against shorter sentences and this is sick, this is sick, and we've got to do something about it ..." The Honorable Anthony M. Kennedy
      Conversation with The Honorable Anthony M. Kennedy
      Aug 28, 2010
      United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
      Conversation with The Honorable Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States.
      33:23 min
      "I would just ask Judges to remember that they're the guardians of freedom, and lawyers to remember that they're the counsellors and the critics and the conscious of the guardians."
      The Honorable Anthony M. Kennedy
      (... link ...)
      Written in a comment sections elsewhere:
      47:25 min ... "negotiation tools, it's not that they're tools themselves, it's not that
      manipulation is as bad as why you're trying to manipulate someone, trying to manipulate somebody into a bad deal then that's, that's immoral." Chris Voss.
      (... link ...)

  • @nanciehuaracha6079
    @nanciehuaracha6079 2 роки тому

    You won't even look at her.....ewe

  • @francesbutters3319
    @francesbutters3319 2 роки тому

    Graham is not a very good person an shouldn't be asking questions, he is very judgemental on everything. I honestly think he has a problem with women who are black ,trying to get on the bench.

  • @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807
    @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807 2 роки тому

    Ok ... things have gone strange ... content on youtube and fb is different to before ... can't order food ... Uber says balance is too low on selected payment method ... looking at the bank page, available balance is enough ... Uber says use another payment method to continue ... there is no other payment option ....

  • @jimfolmar7692
    @jimfolmar7692 2 роки тому +1

    Senator Graham talks about Gitmo detainees (Terrorist),but what about the Jan. 6 detainees ? Crickets

  • @keithwilliams8342
    @keithwilliams8342 2 роки тому

    Lindsay says he isnt holding her clients views against her but that is EXACTLY what he us doing?!?!
    Pathetic.

  • @nopeno6514
    @nopeno6514 2 роки тому

    I believe and make a determination based on my beliefs and not the law which I do not believe. Besides, as nominee I cannot comment on any argument or give my opinion. Also, as a policy matter I cannot speak and respectfully decline to say about my position (smirk).