Play your part in spreading the message of the Quran and Ahlulbayt by performing 3S: I) Share: Help us reach more hearts by sharing this content with your family and friends (especially those unaware of the School of Ahlulbayt). II) Subscribe: Connect with us on UA-cam & Social Media Platforms (links in description). Or join our WhatsApp list by clicking on this link: wa.me/message/TAR3C325Z5LYO1 III) Support: Producing content like this is impossible without your support. Be our patron and pledge your monthly contribution at thaqlain.org/support
❤ Thank you sharing the knowledge. May Allah reward you for all your efforts. Thanks for the analysis that you lay out in all of your topics and episodes ,Sayedina.
The good thing is that if you listen to Shia speakers objectively, some how before they conclude their lectures, the contradictions are always clear. Allahu akbar
Imam 'Ali ibn Abi Talib a,s had his own copy of the holy Quran. It contained the Quranic text we all know القران التعبدي. It also has the explanatory text النص التأويلي
@@Thaqlain Abdullah ibn Umar RA reported: The Prophet sallahu alaihi wasalam, said, “The curse of Allah is upon the one who insults my companions.” Source: al-Mu’jam al-Awsaṭ 7015 Grade: Hasan (fair) according to Al-Albani
@@Thaqlain You mean, Ibnu Umar lied in narrating the hadith? Ibnu Umar is among the younger sahabi who follow everything about how the prophet speaks, the prophet walks, the prophet prays, there is nothing that he does not follow what the prophet shows, ya akhi.. the sahabah Ra does not lie in conveying the hadith of the prophet, because the justice of the sahabah has been determined by Allah Azzawajal and His Messenger. Ibn Umar ra is one of Al abadillah al arba'ah who is very pious and become mufti who being guidance to qibarah sahabah also advisor to amerul mukqminin..
I leave behind u at tsaqalain Kitabullah (quran) and my progeny, my family Quran was clear established before our beloved saww demise Established mean There is real mushaf of quran
Subhan_Allah ; Unfortunately, many Muslims w.w have no problem using the - two face to face hands - pleading symbol to express their gratitude, thanks ,,, I have a problem with that.
You missed an integral part of the story of the apostate. That muhammed did not want to forgive him and stayed silent when uthman begged and the apostate hugged muhammed but he stayed silent and let him go. After he admonished the sahaba for not taking his silence as a signal to kill him. Also he had apostated after he claimed he himself had inserted words into the Qur'an. I study Islam academically
@Rafida Shia Muslim there are many sources such as all the seerah ans hadiths but here is one In Kitab Al-Tabaqat Al-Kabir by Ibn Sa’d (784-845 AD): “A person of al-Ansar had taken a vow to kill Ibn Abi Sarh if he saw him. `Uthman whose foster brother he (Abi Sarh) was, came and interceded for him with the Prophet. The Ansari was waiting for the signal of the Prophet to kill him. `Uthman interceded and he [Muhammad] let him (Abi Sarh) go. Then the apostle of Allah said to the Ansari, “Why did you not fulfill your vow?” He said, “O apostle of Allah! I had my hand on the hilt of the sword waiting for your signal to kill him.” The Prophet said signaling would have been a breach of faith. “It does not behave a prophet to make a signal.” (Tabaqat Al-Kabir, p. 174)
The aim to share this story here was that one can be a scribe for the Prophet and even then become apostate. That's the reason Sayed has explored limited portion of his story.
@@Thaqlain yea understood. Just an interesting part of it. Muaiwiya when studying Islam academically is an extremely interesting character and not in a way that would make ones belief stronger but just the politician he was.
@@maur_sault750 but more interesting is the fact, how Muawiyah acted, like opressing people ( mostly Shia), killing, raging war, in fact he was a big hypocrite like his father and his cursed son Yazid was bad to his bones!
Some muslims logic is, we agree right is right, wrong also right, iblees prostated for six thousand years, before creation of Adam a s. Once iblees come to know, Allah intends to create Adam a s. Iblees felt jealousy, grudge, can we judge? Allah is right, what about iblees, do we say iblees also right?. Who turned hostile, now a days muslims logic is strange, we consider right is right, even wrong we consider as right,of the two options one is right answer, another option is undoubtedly wrong, considering wrong as right, how far this this type of thought is correct, muslims are stuck in this dilemma, this is nothing but influence of iblees, Satan.
Imam Ali (as) is not virtuous alone by his marriage to Lady Fatima (as). Rather it is an evidence of his virtue, simply study his biography to see why he is the best after Rasulallah SAW.
@@nomairshahzad7960 But the “Sheikh” in this video just Said its not a virtue to be married to the prophet, but When its Ali and Fatima its a virtue… double standards
@@moiseqdk4198 Firstly, in my response I stated that the marriage is not a virtue in and of itself. Rather, the marriage between Imam Ali (as) and Lady Fatima (as) is an INDICATOR, of Imam Ali’s virtue. In other words, it is due to the virtue of Imam Ali (as) that he was ordered by Allah SWT (through the Prophet SAW) to marry Lady Fatima (as). As you seem to be stuck on the fact that this marriage is a virtue for Imam Ali (as) no problem let’s explore why that is different. The Prophet SAW had many wives, and with the exception of Lady Khadija (as), was polygamous. The Prophet SAW had what, 10+ Father-in-Laws? How can this be a virtue. There is no significance here, no special status, I ask you what singles these men out? Look into the father of Safiyah and in this video Umm Habiba. They were enemies of the Prophet SAW whilst being his father-in-law. That title is meaningless. Alternatively, with Lady Fatima (as) what do we see? ‘Top’ companions asked for her hand in marriage (the likes of Abu Bakr and Umar) and received BLATANT rejections. If these figures were the best after The Prophet SAW like people claim, why did Rasulallah SAW not marry his daughter to them? Rather Allah had ordered that the only man worthy to marry Lady Fatima (as) was Imam Ali (as) and during their marriage Imam Ali (as) remained strictly monogamous to her. On top of this, this family including Imam Hussein (as) and Imam Hasan (as) were honoured in the Holy Qur’an as the purified and infallible Ahlul-Bayt. Are the father-in-laws of the Prophet SAW part of the Ahlul-Bayt? You have no case to make here, the marriage of Lady Fatima (as) and Imam Ali (as) is categorically, unequivocally and significantly different to the marriages of the Prophet SAW (excluding Lady Khadija (as)).
@@nomairshahzad7960 I agree with you on every point. May Allah reward us a marriage like Ali and fatimas allayhuma salam. But Your rejecting the fact that Abu bakr and Omar was the INNER CIRCLE of the prophet asws so it is a virtue Furthermore, Uthman ra was married to TWO of the prophets daughters, thats a huge virtue. Nobody did the same… Also the prophet asws said if he could he would have married another daughter to uthman if he had (All his children died before him except Fatima.
The root question should be, "Is having a relation to the Prophet a virtue in itself"? The answer is: No. Had that been the case we have seen wife of Lut (as) and son of Nuh (as). The virtue of Imam Ali in regards to Lady Fatima is that he was the only one whose proposal was accepted by Allah and His Messenger for the best lady of the universe.
Play your part in spreading the message of the Quran and Ahlulbayt by performing 3S:
I) Share: Help us reach more hearts by sharing this content with your family and friends (especially those unaware of the School of Ahlulbayt).
II) Subscribe: Connect with us on UA-cam & Social Media Platforms (links in description). Or join our WhatsApp list by clicking on this link: wa.me/message/TAR3C325Z5LYO1
III) Support: Producing content like this is impossible without your support. Be our patron and pledge your monthly contribution at thaqlain.org/support
Allahuma sualıy ala Mohammed waalı Mohammed wa'ajılfarahum
❤ Thank you sharing the knowledge. May Allah reward you for all your efforts.
Thanks for the analysis that you lay out in all of your topics and episodes ,Sayedina.
Share this knowledge with your family and friends. Duas 🤲
You Are Great … stay blessed..MashaAllah ❤
Allahuma salli ala muhammed wala ale muhammed
Subhanallah my brother
JAZAKALLAH KHAIR
The good thing is that if you listen to Shia speakers objectively, some how before they conclude their lectures, the contradictions are always clear.
Allahu akbar
Many who have watched this video will disagree with you :)
Imam 'Ali ibn Abi Talib a,s had his own copy of the holy Quran. It contained the Quranic text we all know القران التعبدي. It also has the explanatory text النص التأويلي
I love all sahabah RA..Abu bakr,umar, ustman, Ali, , Talhah, Zubair, muawiyah, ummul mukminin Aisyah, Hafsah..all of them..Radhiyallahu anhum ajmain.
Did Prophet commanded us to love them all? Even though Muawiya killed Ammar ibn Yasir? Ayesha went to war against Imam Ali?
@@Thaqlain Abdullah ibn Umar RA reported: The Prophet sallahu alaihi wasalam, said, “The curse of Allah is upon the one who insults my companions.”
Source: al-Mu’jam al-Awsaṭ 7015
Grade: Hasan (fair) according to Al-Albani
And what about the fact that this single (lonely) hadith goes against Quran and many Mutawatir hadith?
@@Thaqlain You mean, Ibnu Umar lied in narrating the hadith? Ibnu Umar is among the younger sahabi who follow everything about how the prophet speaks, the prophet walks, the prophet prays, there is nothing that he does not follow what the prophet shows, ya akhi.. the sahabah Ra does not lie in conveying the hadith of the prophet, because the justice of the sahabah has been determined by Allah Azzawajal and His Messenger. Ibn Umar ra is one of Al abadillah al arba'ah who is very pious and become mufti who being guidance to qibarah sahabah also advisor to amerul mukqminin..
If it goes against the Quran than yes 🙂
I leave behind u at tsaqalain
Kitabullah (quran) and my progeny, my family
Quran was clear established before our beloved saww demise
Established mean
There is real mushaf of quran
Subhan_Allah ;
Unfortunately, many Muslims w.w have no problem using the - two face to face hands - pleading symbol to express their gratitude, thanks ,,,
I have a problem with that.
You missed an integral part of the story of the apostate. That muhammed did not want to forgive him and stayed silent when uthman begged and the apostate hugged muhammed but he stayed silent and let him go. After he admonished the sahaba for not taking his silence as a signal to kill him. Also he had apostated after he claimed he himself had inserted words into the Qur'an. I study Islam academically
Can you kindly elaborate more here, and/or provide references that elaborate more on this?
Thank you.
@Rafida Shia Muslim there are many sources such as all the seerah ans hadiths but here is one In Kitab Al-Tabaqat Al-Kabir by Ibn Sa’d (784-845 AD):
“A person of al-Ansar had taken a vow to kill Ibn Abi Sarh if he saw him. `Uthman whose foster brother he (Abi Sarh) was, came and interceded for him with the Prophet. The Ansari was waiting for the signal of the Prophet to kill him. `Uthman interceded and he [Muhammad] let him (Abi Sarh) go. Then the apostle of Allah said to the Ansari, “Why did you not fulfill your vow?” He said, “O apostle of Allah! I had my hand on the hilt of the sword waiting for your signal to kill him.” The Prophet said signaling would have been a breach of faith. “It does not behave a prophet to make a signal.” (Tabaqat Al-Kabir, p. 174)
The aim to share this story here was that one can be a scribe for the Prophet and even then become apostate. That's the reason Sayed has explored limited portion of his story.
@@Thaqlain yea understood. Just an interesting part of it. Muaiwiya when studying Islam academically is an extremely interesting character and not in a way that would make ones belief stronger but just the politician he was.
@@maur_sault750 but more interesting is the fact, how Muawiyah acted, like opressing people ( mostly Shia), killing, raging war, in fact he was a big hypocrite like his father and his cursed son Yazid was bad to his bones!
Some muslims logic is, we agree right is right, wrong also right, iblees prostated for six thousand years, before creation of Adam a s. Once iblees come to know, Allah intends to create Adam a s. Iblees felt jealousy, grudge, can we judge? Allah is right, what about iblees, do we say iblees also right?. Who turned hostile, now a days muslims logic is strange, we consider right is right, even wrong we consider as right,of the two options one is right answer, another option is undoubtedly wrong, considering wrong as right, how far this this type of thought is correct, muslims are stuck in this dilemma, this is nothing but influence of iblees, Satan.
If its not a virtue to be father-in-law of the prophet asws then You have to reject Ali as virtue of marrying Fatima as
Imam Ali (as) is not virtuous alone by his marriage to Lady Fatima (as). Rather it is an evidence of his virtue, simply study his biography to see why he is the best after Rasulallah SAW.
@@nomairshahzad7960 But the “Sheikh” in this video just Said its not a virtue to be married to the prophet, but When its Ali and Fatima its a virtue… double standards
@@moiseqdk4198 Firstly, in my response I stated that the marriage is not a virtue in and of itself. Rather, the marriage between Imam Ali (as) and Lady Fatima (as) is an INDICATOR, of Imam Ali’s virtue. In other words, it is due to the virtue of Imam Ali (as) that he was ordered by Allah SWT (through the Prophet SAW) to marry Lady Fatima (as).
As you seem to be stuck on the fact that this marriage is a virtue for Imam Ali (as) no problem let’s explore why that is different.
The Prophet SAW had many wives, and with the exception of Lady Khadija (as), was polygamous. The Prophet SAW had what, 10+ Father-in-Laws? How can this be a virtue. There is no significance here, no special status, I ask you what singles these men out? Look into the father of Safiyah and in this video Umm Habiba. They were enemies of the Prophet SAW whilst being his father-in-law. That title is meaningless.
Alternatively, with Lady Fatima (as) what do we see? ‘Top’ companions asked for her hand in marriage (the likes of Abu Bakr and Umar) and received BLATANT rejections. If these figures were the best after The Prophet SAW like people claim, why did Rasulallah SAW not marry his daughter to them? Rather Allah had ordered that the only man worthy to marry Lady Fatima (as) was Imam Ali (as) and during their marriage Imam Ali (as) remained strictly monogamous to her.
On top of this, this family including Imam Hussein (as) and Imam Hasan (as) were honoured in the Holy Qur’an as the purified and infallible Ahlul-Bayt. Are the father-in-laws of the Prophet SAW part of the Ahlul-Bayt?
You have no case to make here, the marriage of Lady Fatima (as) and Imam Ali (as) is categorically, unequivocally and significantly different to the marriages of the Prophet SAW (excluding Lady Khadija (as)).
@@nomairshahzad7960 I agree with you on every point. May Allah reward us a marriage like Ali and fatimas allayhuma salam. But Your rejecting the fact that Abu bakr and Omar was the INNER CIRCLE of the prophet asws so it is a virtue
Furthermore, Uthman ra was married to TWO of the prophets daughters, thats a huge virtue. Nobody did the same…
Also the prophet asws said if he could he would have married another daughter to uthman if he had (All his children died before him except Fatima.
The root question should be, "Is having a relation to the Prophet a virtue in itself"?
The answer is: No. Had that been the case we have seen wife of Lut (as) and son of Nuh (as).
The virtue of Imam Ali in regards to Lady Fatima is that he was the only one whose proposal was accepted by Allah and His Messenger for the best lady of the universe.