you've heard of the "guess who's the anime protagonist in the school" meme, now get ready for "guess who's Walter Van Beirendonck in the runway show audience"
Thank God for fast forward so I didn't have to waste 21 minutes of my life. Other than Rick Owen's wife on the left side front seat, most of the audience looked either scared or bored.
Não consigo gostar ,não encontro beleza nisto,ainda agora vi a noir , é diferente de tudo mas bonito ,os vestidos são autênticas obras de arte,mas a comme des garsons acho horrível!
@@r4innyd4y91 Think of them not as metaphors, but as studies or experiments based on her fashion principles and idiosyncratic technical leitmotifs. She is a designer, an architect. She consciously flouts the maxims of sexiness, symmetry and form-fittingness, which somewhat explains the appearance of her couture looks. She has also always attempted to create something completely new, so rather than combining too many existing concepts, you can tell she expends great efforts to operate in an almost completely self-referential artistic style, applied to a few key themes each season. The title of her 'Play' line might be a key to interpreting her work: toyish explorations of taking vestiary parameters to their extremes, with a subtle emotional/subjective dimension oscillating somewhere between melancholy, playfulness and determination. Based on what little information she shares in interviews, she seems to start from abstract concepts to produce aesthetic representations of those concepts; other artists might operate differently. You could also consider her statement about not being able to separate art from business: she designs AKA pragmatically solves the problem of couture fashion with her Comme des Garçons line using her conceptual inversions and technical masterfulness. Yes she also puts out conventional clothes through such diffusion labels as Play, Homme Plus, , i.e. understands the various meanings and purposes clothes have in people's life, on the levels of art and craft. You must understand she is the leader of an empire of various sub-brands, stores and other designers, and her structural and visionary 'touch' extends also beyond clothesmaking towards corporate strategy and management. You might not appreciate her couture pieces because you have certain inalienable preferences and favourite references, and that's fine. This is just my interpretation: she arrives at these weird platonic solid thingamajigs by entertaining the idea of 'things that can't be further reduced' and firmly understanding fashion history - how else would she know what to avoid?
Some people don't get it, but that's ok. She's not for everyone. I love it and she's one of the best!!!
alot of people have never gotten it, since 1981
you've heard of the "guess who's the anime protagonist in the school" meme, now get ready for "guess who's Walter Van Beirendonck in the runway show audience"
excellent! XD
@@TheOlim01 noone :
Walter Van Beirendonck : ✌️👲✌️
Does someone have a list of the songs featured in this soundtrack?
Like how Michele doesn’t turn her head rather she waits for the models to pass her to look at the clothing
Love!!! Upload with sound please 🙏
best part are the socks and shoes the clothes are an insult to women but the fabrics are exquisite
@Denise Decardo You're an insult to women. You just stick to your 10 dollar skinny jeans, sneaker socks and white Nikes.
Thanks 🙏
why did they put michelle in that horrible seat she could barley get a view of anything
An artistic metaphor for life continuity
Would have been great with the sound
コンドームドレスわろた
havent we had enough of this
Never!! She's an artist as well!!! Love it all!!!
All I see is Michèle Lamy...
Thank God for fast forward so I didn't have to waste 21 minutes of my life. Other than Rick Owen's wife on the left side front seat, most of the audience looked either scared or bored.
never boring
roba aliena
羅生門の京マチ子を思わせるような顔を大きく覆った被り物。コロナを予見していたのが凄い
Michele)
Weird people would wear weird designs like these
Não consigo gostar ,não encontro beleza nisto,ainda agora vi a noir , é diferente de tudo mas bonito ,os vestidos são autênticas obras de arte,mas a comme des garsons acho horrível!
Nothing but awful pile of cloths
so ugly.. im not gonna pretend to say its good
It's beautiful. It's not for everyone, but her true followers understand her work.
@@madrecital9928 what's ur interpretation of her work of you have one? what do you think she's trying to tell with her clothes?
@@r4innyd4y91 Think of them not as metaphors, but as studies or experiments based on her fashion principles and idiosyncratic technical leitmotifs. She is a designer, an architect. She consciously flouts the maxims of sexiness, symmetry and form-fittingness, which somewhat explains the appearance of her couture looks. She has also always attempted to create something completely new, so rather than combining too many existing concepts, you can tell she expends great efforts to operate in an almost completely self-referential artistic style, applied to a few key themes each season. The title of her 'Play' line might be a key to interpreting her work: toyish explorations of taking vestiary parameters to their extremes, with a subtle emotional/subjective dimension oscillating somewhere between melancholy, playfulness and determination. Based on what little information she shares in interviews, she seems to start from abstract concepts to produce aesthetic representations of those concepts; other artists might operate differently. You could also consider her statement about not being able to separate art from business: she designs AKA pragmatically solves the problem of couture fashion with her Comme des Garçons line using her conceptual inversions and technical masterfulness. Yes she also puts out conventional clothes through such diffusion labels as Play, Homme Plus, , i.e. understands the various meanings and purposes clothes have in people's life, on the levels of art and craft. You must understand she is the leader of an empire of various sub-brands, stores and other designers, and her structural and visionary 'touch' extends also beyond clothesmaking towards corporate strategy and management. You might not appreciate her couture pieces because you have certain inalienable preferences and favourite references, and that's fine. This is just my interpretation: she arrives at these weird platonic solid thingamajigs by entertaining the idea of 'things that can't be further reduced' and firmly understanding fashion history - how else would she know what to avoid?