2m Low Pass Filter for Ham Radio
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- In this video we take a look at a homebrew 2m low pass filter. I wanted to see if I could add a filter to a dirty radio and clean up it's spurious emissions.
Filter Designer: markimicrowave...
👍Join this channel:
/ @thesmokinape
👍Support TheSmokinApe Channel on Patreon Here: / thesmokinape
🔥🔥🔥 Get your Ham Radio License using Ham Radio Prep:
shareasale.com...
USE CODE "SmokinApe" for 20% OFF
Links to products in the video:
👍10w 40dB Attenuator: amz.run/5h5J
👍100w 40dB Attenuator: www.amazon.com...
👍TinySA Ultra AURSINC: www.amazon.com...
👍www.amazon.com...
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
If you liked this video you can see more like it here:
👍 / thesmokinape
You can also follow me on Twitter and Instagram:
👍 / thesmokinape
👍 / thesmokinape
I've built my own filters using that exact website. It's a brilliant tool.
Chebyshev filters *add* passband ripple in order to have a steeper rolloff. Butterworth filters have no ripple but will rolloff slower and give less suppression on the harmonics (which you could compensate with 5th order for example). It's all a compromise.
Thanks for the info, I want to do more filter builds. I have done a few with varying degrees of success 👍
Fun. If you do it again, you might check SWR of the filter on a VNA. It should be good, but you never know.
Good call Lee, I just checked and it was 2.4:1 on 146.52
@@TheSmokinApeWell given the crap antenna that comes with these Chinese crap radios...
Great video and thanks for sharing the mark microwave resource. Keep on keeping on, brother Ape!
Hey Gap! Thanks for watching bro 👍
nice. I meant to fiddle with my test board a while back. Would be fun to have the smt version of this with a little easy bake wave solder oven.
I have to check but I think I have some SMD test boards, too much junk here 👀
Good presentation!
Thanks OM 👍
@TheSmokinApe
Simulation of the circuit with the values from Marki's filter calculator does not show the insertion loss peaking at 300 MHz, then increasing response above that. The loss should continue to drop, out to infinity. One of the culprits is almost certainly excessive lead length of the capacitors. I guesstimated the inductance of the leads and the test boards at around 15 nH for each capacitor, and simulation with that value puts the dip in response at around 300 MHz, just as your filter shows. You can find air core inductor calculators on the web, you'll probably have to try several to find one you like. I guesstimated the dimensions of your inductor and added the guesstimated inductance of the leads and the inductance you have should be in the right ballpark. Your measurement of 2.4:1 SWR is suspect, just doesn't feel right with the rest of your measurements at and near the design cutoff. I would build another filter without using the NanoVNA TestBoard. Too much stray inductance and capacitance for any serious work with those. Just solder a couple of SMA edge connectors to a piece of double sided PC board of appropriate width - just enough to fit your inductor between them, maybe .6" to .75" - then solder the inductor in. Then solder in the caps with the body of the cap practically laying on the PCB, leaving (damn near) zero lead length, and solder the other lead of the cap with the body of the cap practically up against the inductor/connector junction, again with (damn near) zero lead length. Now, sweep that sucker! I have built circuits like that for operation well above 2 meters, well into the gigahertz range. Another suggestion: those capacitor kits. Who made the capacitors? Some of those kits are OK, some of them barely earn the rating of "junk." Murata and Panasonic have always made top notch capacitors, Vishay is also good as high as I have tested them (low VHF). There are several others, but they don't make a lot of leaded capacitors, mostly surface mount. And they probably don't make kits. Life is getting harder for hobbyists and experimenters. If you don't know how to check caps at VHF and up with a VNA, learn how, and test the caps you've got. If they don't perform, well, at least you can use the boxes to put good capacitors in. Buy them from Mouser and Digikey or other reliable vendor.
Wow JAA, thank you for the insight. Great post 👍
Regarding the A36 CPS, there is a column heading for “Signaling.” From the factory, some frequencies were set at 5 and some at 1. What is this and what should the values be set at for simplex and repeater operations. Thanks!
Sorry Steve, I’m not sure. Given how dirty this radio is I really haven’t invested much time into messing with it 👍
Nice job on the filter, I guess on a better radio it should clean it up!
Thanks Chuck, I do think it would have worked better on a less terrible radios. Back to the drawing board 👍
Need Help ! Im doing satellites contact , and in FM everything is allright . But i just bought 2 Yaesu Ft817 and im trying SSB satellites . The thing is , when i transmmit on 2M the receiver on the 70cm side is 100% overloaded by the near by transmitter . Do i need a low pass on 2M or a high pass on 70cm , or both ?
Im using an Arrow dual band yagi with 2 separate coax , connector and radio .
Thank you and 73 !
VE2XXQ FN46rx
I'd look into the Sotabeams Bandpass.
Have you tried a bpf? Another section or look for higher Q using same network.
Great video!
73'
de K4WRF
I haven’t done a BPF on 2m yet if that’s what you mean. I’m noodling with a 5 pole network for this one but I’m not sure how much time I want to put into it. Thanks for the comment Walt 👍
I made a couple ugly component fixtures but I'm ordering a couple like you used today. Thanks! Keep up the good work...
Thanks Watt, appreciate you watching 👍
Man i really wish those radios were better. I want the clear case😂
Clear cases are cool 😎
👍
🍻
I forgot just how dirty that radio transmits! It is a shame the manufacturer either didn't test for spectral purity or didn't care that it was out of spec. Neither is acceptable.
Yeah, it’s pretty bad. What’s worse is people getting upset that I pointed it out 😮
Thanks for another good video, I don’t understand everything you talk about in your videos but I always learn something.
Thanks Bob, hell I don’t know what I’m talking about 1/2 the time 👍
Nice filter experiment. I think I have one of those NanoVNA test board kits around here someplace. Man, that radio is really bad when your filter could not knock down the spurs!
Hey SF, yeah this radio is terrible. Those boards are pretty handy to tests like this 👍
Interesting experiment, but that proto board will introduce a significant amount of capacitance to your circuit. In addition, keeping your capacitor leads so long will add inductance in series, creating tuned circuits. Despite the limitations of your setup, I applaud your experiment and your video. This is the type of experimentation that will make ham radio a great training ground for competent, trained radio operators. Congratulations!
Hey Donna, totally agree with your points about capacitance. Thanks for watching the video 👍
Very interesting 😊
Thanks Kevin 👍
Dammit Ape, I ain't got time to get interested in filter design... Looks fun, well at least you made it look fun
You just need a time making machine 👍
@@TheSmokinApe Tried.. all it does is suck time though. Need to reverse the polarity I think
lol
Great video! Have always believed that this would be a great project for all those dirty 💩💩💩💩 Baofengs!! 😝😝😝 73 de VK2AOE
Hey TAOE, thanks for watching bro!
Theres not too much in this filter. Nice kit to do some testing Mr Primate.
That radio is dirtier than your red headed cousin but you got her in rehab, work in progress.😂👍
Thanks Don. Those little test boards make this stuff a whole lot easier 👍
Pretty nice!
Thanks John 👍
At least the Talkpod is good for something! Cool to see that test.
lol, thanks for watching Mike 👍
Hi Ape,
Very good experiment that actually worked. If you can't steepen the curve, maybe another stage of filtering. I've seen Chebyshev filters with 3 and more stages. Stay safe. 73 WJ3U
Yeah, I was looking at a 5 pole design earlier today. Thanks for watching Don 👍
I wish I had watched this before I started trying to make a broadcast filter for my SDR. I was expecting to just follow a plan and tune it up a bit but I learned the long way about the Nth order versions being necessary for stronger interference.
Also what do you look for in a capacitor assortment like that assuming they will just be used for filters and filters disguised as other things like band traps?
I inherited a whole shack of random parts from an SK so I haven't had to buy many capacitors yet but it would be nice to not have to search through his unlabeled boxes of jumbled 1960s capacitors to find what I need assuming he didn't use all of whatever I'm looking for :)
I like using the silver mica caps but haven’t had luck finding an assortment of them. I did get a bunch of different ones from Tube Depot
You might check out what I did working as a co-op engineering student at a USAF radar site. With multi-megawatts of RF floating around, I worried that the two-meter transceiver in my car might get fried. I made a quarter-wave (corrected for the velocity factor) coax stub shorted at the end. It gave me no problems on receive or transmit, but it was a dead short for even multiples of 145 MHz and a partial short at other frequencies. It's easy and costs almost nothing. It is also a good way to kill that second harmonic on those cheap Chinese hand-helds.
Is there a link? I should play around with stubs more 👀
You're learning fast. You'll be a good UA-cam Elmer, and UA-cam desperately needs good Elmers. Now try a closer-wound inductor with fewer turns. That will reduce the loss of the filter.
Thanks for the tip and the words of encouragement John 👍
great project . to bad the prototype board is small. to clean up more you would need more sections . but doing that you will get more insertion loss . Sota beams has a 2 meter bandpass filter . the down side is have to take it out to use 70 cm. 73's
And it's like 50$, thanks for the comment Robert
What I find amazing is the manufacturer was too cheap to add 2 capacitors and a coiled piece of wire to their output. 🤔🇨🇦
Right, makes no sense.
I told you I was going to watch… neat project☑️
I knew you weren’t lying, was it all you hoped for?
@@TheSmokinApe and more! You made that yourself. Do you ever worry about having so much knowledge?
You are testing TX mode, will this work as RX also?
It will 👍
cyan is a light blue colour 😂
Well, I am certainly glad we got that sorted out. Just imagine all the viewers thinking that was the wrong color.
Great video Mr Ape
Thank you LC 🍻
fun video
Thanks Thump, was a fun project.
Hi Ape. Every filter hobbyist knows the problem with the exact capacitor values.
I would have built the filter into a shielded sleeve that could be plugged onto the radio and measured the harmonics at a distance of around 20 meters with the Tiny
SA antenna and this in the open field.
Hey Karl. Yeah, encasing the filter would have been ideal but I was just messing around and decided to make it a video. The emissions test is supposed to be performed at the transmitter output but a field strength test would have been cool to do as well 👍
@@TheSmokinApeThanks Ape. I would say there is still plenty of room for further experimentation. ;-)
@@karlbesser1696 totally agree, I looking at a 5 pole design but it looks like a lot of work LOL! Thanks Karl!
Measuring harmonics at a distance is fraught with difficulties. What is the gain of the transmitting antenna at the fundamental and harmonic frequencies? What is the gain of the receiving antenna at the fundamental and harmonic frequencies? Are there nearby objects that the signal will reflect off of and affect your measurements? (There are.) Will those reflections affect your measurements the same at all frequencies? (No, they won't, their effects will be unpredictable as hell.) The way to measure the harmonic output of a transmitter is through coaxial cable into a spectrum analyzer, using an appropriate amount of attenuation to be certain that you're not overdriving the spectrum analyzer and generating harmonics in the analyzer itself. (The test done by SmokinApe above may not have met that condition.)
@@JimAndyAllyn Hi Jim, when I measured (in the open field), I wasn't interested in measuring the absolute values of the field strengths, but rather how the harmonics form relative to the fundamental wave, measured once with and without a filter. The transmitting and receiving antennas are the same and the measurement setup is such that no significant reflections can occur. Then you can say whether the filter has served its purpose or not.
"capacitor shunt to ground" 🫢🫢🫢
That’s what it’s called.