Instead of looking into why it was banned, look into what is actually _in_ the Bible. If God, the Creator, intended the Book of Judith to be included, He would have included it, yes?
That’s an interesting perspective. However, the inclusion or exclusion of certain books, like the Book of Judith, often came down to decisions made by councils of men in church history. The Bible as we know it was compiled over centuries, and different denominations even today include or exclude certain texts. For example, the Book of Judith is part of the Catholic and Orthodox Bibles but not the Protestant Bible. Perhaps it’s worth considering that human interpretation played a significant role in shaping what we consider ‘Scripture’ today, even if we trust in God’s overarching guidance.
It was in the King James Bible 1611 edition. It has been men who canonised different bibles over the years, many with their own slant and not for scripture sake. This is why now in the end times knowledge is being increased and these books are coming back into the light.
@@RideTheHighs You’re absolutely right that canonization has often been shaped by human influence, with theological and political agendas playing a role throughout history. The 1611 King James Bible did include books like Judith as part of the Apocrypha, but later versions excluded them due to shifting doctrinal priorities. It’s fascinating to see how knowledge is evolving, prompting people to revisit these texts for their historical and spiritual insights, especially as conversations about their relevance continue in modern times.
@@dariuslembert8717 An interesting perspective! The idea of the end of an astrological era reflects shifts in how we interpret the cosmos and humanity’s place within it. While some see signs of finality, others see it as a transition into something new-perhaps the beginning of a deeper understanding or a fresh chapter in spiritual and historical awareness.
Instead of looking into why it was banned, look into what is actually _in_ the Bible. If God, the Creator, intended the Book of Judith to be included, He would have included it, yes?
That’s an interesting perspective. However, the inclusion or exclusion of certain books, like the Book of Judith, often came down to decisions made by councils of men in church history. The Bible as we know it was compiled over centuries, and different denominations even today include or exclude certain texts. For example, the Book of Judith is part of the Catholic and Orthodox Bibles but not the Protestant Bible. Perhaps it’s worth considering that human interpretation played a significant role in shaping what we consider ‘Scripture’ today, even if we trust in God’s overarching guidance.
It was in the King James Bible 1611 edition. It has been men who canonised different bibles over the years, many with their own slant and not for scripture sake. This is why now in the end times knowledge is being increased and these books are coming back into the light.
It’s the end of astrological era but not the end times 😢😊
@@RideTheHighs You’re absolutely right that canonization has often been shaped by human influence, with theological and political agendas playing a role throughout history. The 1611 King James Bible did include books like Judith as part of the Apocrypha, but later versions excluded them due to shifting doctrinal priorities. It’s fascinating to see how knowledge is evolving, prompting people to revisit these texts for their historical and spiritual insights, especially as conversations about their relevance continue in modern times.
@@dariuslembert8717 An interesting perspective! The idea of the end of an astrological era reflects shifts in how we interpret the cosmos and humanity’s place within it. While some see signs of finality, others see it as a transition into something new-perhaps the beginning of a deeper understanding or a fresh chapter in spiritual and historical awareness.