The government is actually the people who write the measure with the vested interest. It's so sad that they passed the California Prop 19 by completely painting a different picture. Appreciate you watching!
No. No on prop 33. Rent price is not the root cause, but high property taxes, insurance and association fees are. Landlords simply don’t have a choice.
@@iamwhitegrizzly The state is building apartments for the homeless according to Prop 1, won in March 2024. These apartments will be at no cost to them. We all will pay for it via higher taxes.
Yes on 33 because rent is already too high and it’s getting worse and worse. Those homes built before 1995. Guess what? Their rent is cheaper. So yes on 33. What we need to do is stop overtaxing properties as well
Thanks for watching! If housing providers can't even recoup their money, we will have no investment, hence we will have a lot of deferred maintenance on properties, resulting in bad living conditions and hence dropping values and economy. Want to vote yes on 33, think again!
Thank you for the info.
It can be confusing when the government explains this.
The government is actually the people who write the measure with the vested interest. It's so sad that they passed the California Prop 19 by completely painting a different picture.
Appreciate you watching!
Yes on 33
Thanks for watching! I would love to hear why you say Yes, just like I gave my views on it!
No. No on prop 33. Rent price is not the root cause, but high property taxes, insurance and association fees are. Landlords simply don’t have a choice.
We have more vacant homes than we do homeless people so yes on 33
@@iamwhitegrizzly The state is building apartments for the homeless according to Prop 1, won in March 2024. These apartments will be at no cost to them. We all will pay for it via higher taxes.
Yes on 33 because rent is already too high and it’s getting worse and worse. Those homes built before 1995. Guess what? Their rent is cheaper. So yes on 33. What we need to do is stop overtaxing properties as well
Thanks for watching! If housing providers can't even recoup their money, we will have no investment, hence we will have a lot of deferred maintenance on properties, resulting in bad living conditions and hence dropping values and economy. Want to vote yes on 33, think again!
Great info! I'm not a housing provider (landlord) but I won't support this proposal!
Glad that I could explain. Thanks for watching.
Vote NO on prop 33. Vote NO on all props except 3, 34 & 36
Thanks for watching and your recommendation!