I’m a simple guy, I love simple rock and roll! Oh, like Creedence? No no, it has to be rhythmically interesting! Oh ok, like Zeppelin? Ew no, it has to be looser, not too heavy! Oh, like the Band, maybe? Ugh, no, it has to be improvised, playing off each other spontaneously! Oh I see, like the Dead. No, I hate them too.
He just sounds like a jealous egomaniac who can't take either criticism or competition. The Rolling Stones have been bland, corporate rock for forty years now.
why would he be jealous? also, the stones have been coroporate lately thanks to jagger not keith. He has said many times he wants to take the stones back to their roots instead of chasing trends.
I've always loved much of the music of the Stones, but Keith Richards has always been a bit of jealous douche of just about anyone unless they were and old blues player, ironically, one of his heroes, Chuck Berry, was pretty dismissive of Richards playing, Berry had the reputation of being difficult to get along with. I've seen The Band with Dylan, CCR, and LZ (3 times in the 70s) and all of them sounded great live. Having only watched live footage of Stones shows, I don't necessarily care for how they change and present their songs in their concerts.
the ultimate compliment to Zeppelin is Page appears on at least one Stones Album and parts of Pages work with Keith has subsequently been released as "Scarlet"
Keith is a caricature of himself these days, a shy man trying to be a tough rock God and the bands he dislikes only proves he doesn't appreciate rock and roll.
Keith looks every bit his 80 years. The fact that he toured the world at 80 supporting a new album is amazing, even if he had led a clean, quiet life of moderation.
@@MartinusBremerus Ah. I don't care either, not for people I don't really know. If a friend looked 10yrs older than they were, I'd try to help them get healthy. Anyway, care or not, I'm not blind, & neither are you.
I just think it’s a competition thing with Richards,who I didn’t think was a top five or a top ten performer.The Stones were a solid band with solid ,body moving songs. LZ,CCR,Dylan and the Band are just different in their approach to entertainment.You don’t have to jump all over the stage to impress your audience,they come to listen primarily.The Rolling Stones were a spectacle.Sorry Keith,you don’t have to show your ass to impress anyone….just play well.
For me, when I go to see a live band, I want to see how well they engage the crowd with interesting dynamics, surprises in the arrangement, highlighting different musicians and improvised solos that delight the crowd. That's why I go to a show. Live music can be a life-changing experience for the audience, winning new lifetime fans and thrilling the faithful, if the artists take advantage of it.
@@spidgeb3292 Some surprises are bad surprises. 1/I saw the band Argent, to hear organist Rod Argent's perfect playing. There's a magical organ fill on one of his songs that he didn't bother to play live. The best part of the song, gone. 2/Roy Buchanan ended an instrumental w/a simulated steel-guitar riff, by wrapping his little finger around his Telecaster's volume knob, while bending multiple strings. Live, he lit a cigarette instead, while the band ended the song without him. Again, the best part of the song, gone, for a joke. If I like the record, I wanna hear what made me like the record. What passes for 'improvisation', in many cases, just isn't very good.
@@lazur1 Very true. I've experienced the same thing, especially with traveling blues musicians, who will use organ, horns, etc. on their recordings, but travel as a 3-piece. That can be a letdown. I've left some of my favorite blues players' shows early because their sound was just flat and empty relative to the recordings. Plus, there are bad nights. Bob Dylan, e.g., had a LOT of bad nights, but I think he felt contempt for his audience and humanity in general.That said, the excitement from live music, seeing art created in real time, for me is unbeatable, especially when the band is actually striving to entertain vs. just getting it over with. I've seen many more of the former than of the latter I'm much more likely to enjoy the live show much more than the recordings. Mumford and Sons and Avett Brothers come to mind as bands I've seen that blew me away live, even though I wasn't a fan of their recordings.
Someone should teach the AI bot about redundancy - how many times do we need it pointed out that Keef is opinionated. This is a 10 minute video that could have been two.
@ernestofranklin1891 @thefuzzboxx1018 I agree with both of you, and with him. I saw the Dead a couple of times back in '81 and '82. I had a lot of fun that was less about their musicianship than it was about getting very, very high, preferably on acid or mescaline and the like, with a few thousand like-minded people. About 10 years ago a radio station that I often listened to aired a syndicated Grateful Dead show every week. This particular show specialized in getting their hands on high-quality bootleg recordings of their live shows, which the band famously encouraged. When they were playing songs, they were fine. Not especially inspired or inspiring, but nothing wrong with them either. But every show included at least one of the Space Jams that they were also known for. So here I am, still and always a music lover, listening to them at my home on Sunday nights, no drugs in me, no party around me, and you know how people will sometimes say, "You had to be there!"? Well, "they" were right. You DID have to be there. At least, in order to appreciate anything about those jams. Which were not just the length of a song btw - they would last 20 or 25 minutes. Just a total waste. The people who were choosing to play that stuff on the radio? I would have to guess that they were massively stoned, and expecting their audience to be doing the same. I can't think of any other excuse, except one: It's entirely possible that these people were essentially brainwashing themselves into believing that there was something of great value in those jams, and if you didn't get it, that was your own fault for not being hip enough. Which is not something you'd want to admit to, right? So they kept airing this noise that was never actually meant to be aired in the first place. Which if I was hearing Keith correctly was the source of his main complaint about them.
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles
Why would any musician or band care about this relics stamp of approval . The stones were a bunch of Londoners living in a rainy island like Britain who sounded like they came from the deep south in America . Everything from Richards stolen American blues riffs to jagger nasal American accent was pure americana. While the Beatles were a blues band to a degree they didn't sing with stupid American accents and their music had a certain English sound at least on some of their records . Or to put it more accurately unlike the stones they sounded like they could have come from anywhere .
You must be a young punk. You know nothing. Lady Jane , As Tears Go By, Paint It Black among about 100 other songs I could name by the Stones are Americana? Do you hear an American accent on Lady Jane or Ruby Tuesday??? As far as guitar playing with 5 strings no less again you proudly show how absent facts are from your tiny world. Man you better just go away, you don't know JACK.
Same with the dead,The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles
I don't think he's envious. I don't think he'd have anything to be envious of, in the music of these other bands. I think that something which can sound a lot like envy, but isn't, is the perspective of someone who had been playing and recording music professionally for most of a decade before any of those bands came along (closer to 3 in the case of GnR) and is listening to people who are both his peers and his competitors. He didn't really put any of them down, exactly, except GnR, for copying his and other originals' style, which is fair enough. He kept saying things like "They just didn't do anything for me", which is also fair enough, considering that he could hardly be coming from anywhere other than that perspective.
He can like or not like who he wants to... Interestingly enough, I didn't like the Rolling Stones until I was in my late teens and then I met my best friend who loved them and I grew to appreciate them and love them. My surprise is his discontent with Led Zeppelin. Bands have a lead singer which ultimately can make or break a band, then they have great musicians as far as playing instruments and then they all write great songs together. The thing about Robert Plant, is that his voice was the ultimate and an incredible instrument all on it's own. Sorry, but anyone that doesn't acknowledge that, I question their opinion, hearing ability or maybe just outright jealousy???
You are mentioning "drugs" in a video with Keith Richards? Keith probably did more drugs than the whole Grateful Dead band combined. As for sheer creativity, the Stones could not approach the Dead. The Stones were just doing the blues.
a joke that's only a stereotype...this Deadhead still loves The Stones. And we Deadheads don't run out of drugs. And one of the reasons we do drugs is because life isn't so boring with a little mental aid upon occasion. Signed 400 plus GD shows later...
@@spidgeb3292Lesser known fact: When the Butterfield Band moved to California, the Grateful Dead were just a 'regular' band. Garcia'd been an acoustic player up until a minute before. When they heard Bloomfield on 'East West', a light went on: "We can do that!".
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles.Thats why Keith hates dead that's a type of music Stones just didn't do well.
If anyone has read his book then you can get an inkling of where he is coming from, which btw doesn’t make him right being that the Stones themselves have drifted off the rock and roll originality more than a few times, and in my opinion at least haven’t made a decent album since Tattoo you!
That is Mick Jaggers fault because he insists on trying to keep them sounding trendy. Keef has always hated the overproduced nonsense Mick stuffs into the post tattoo you stuff
Deep Purple was biggest touring band in world '71-'73 No hard rock band put out a better string of LPs than In Rock, Fireball, Machine Head and Made In Japan.
There will always be a little bad blood between Stones and the Dead from Altamont. Everyone trying to blame others for the clusterf&#$. And their whole approach to music is opposite.
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles.Thats why Keith hates dead that's a type of music Stones just didn't do well.
Wow, outsold the Stones for 4 years, impressive. What about the 50+ years? How many arenas did CCR/Fogerty sell out this year? I like CCR but most of their songs are pretty samey, stylistic diversity is not exactly their strong suit. FWIW I’d hardly call the writer of many of the most iconic riffs in rock music a “pretender” but each to his own.
@@englishjim6428 Fair enough Jim on the stadiums, but you make the mistake many do with CCR with the 'samey' thang. Anybody who can write, sing, play on, arrange, produce, git, piano, organ, sax, harmonica, yazoo even on songs as diverse as Born on the Bayou to Born to Move, Porterville, Penthouse Pauper to Proud Mary, It's just a thought to Commotion, Rockin all Over the World to Hideaway, Fortunate Son to Old Man Down the Road, Cross Tie Walker to Long as I can see the Light is anything but 'samey' (ya don't know half of those songs do ya Jim?). I think Fogerty is a far more rounded musician than Keef, and I got plenty of Stones in my collection.When in N'awins I go down to the same bar that Mick and Keef roll along to when in N'awlins, and there are plenty of musicians there who are way above Keef and Mick's abilities, but never 'made it'. Those open G riffs he made are pretty great, but so a is Fogerty playing in his D tuning for "that" CCR sound, both of them backed by great rhythm sections..Each to their own as you say, but Keef was moaning about CCR when they were at their peak, probably in a hazy drug induced, head sauced snozzle, not in 2024. Of course, he and Mick, later invited Fogerty to come along and play with them somewhere in Cali. Good UA-cam of it out there.
And BTW, Mick Taylor, enormous respect, commented that he had to whip the Stones into shape musically and even Bill Wyman claims that Keef 'borrowed' some of his much vaunted killer riffs from him, that was probably what I was alluding to with the 'pretender' thing, along with his faux, 'look at how out there I am" drug behaviour, a bit way OTT, IMHO.
@ FWIW I saw them (second show) at the Albert Hall in 1970 (if I recall correctly). I actually went to see Booker T and the MGs who opened for them but stayed for most of their set. It was pretty good. I have all of their decent albums (4 or 5 maybe) not including a couple of live ones. They were a good band that was very popular for a few years. As a professional musician for over 50 years I’ve probably played most of their catalog at one time or another, not an especially challenging task btw. Thanks for being so patronizing, makes me feel young again.
Keith Richards is a wet-brained wash-up who never plays the same thing because he CAN'T! There's difference between what Eddie Van Halen did so effortlessly and what Richards never did outside the recording studio. EXAMPLE: The simplistic sonic layering of the intro to Gimme Shelter. Beautiful. Genius. Never, ever to be heard again in a live performance. Why? He can't play it obviously. Recording studio trickery. All of it. So of course Keith hates anyone who can do, what Keith can't.
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles.Thats why Keith hates dead that's a type of music Stones just didn't do well.
So, The Band is too precise while The Grateful Dead were meandering? Basically, every band except the Stones were sub-par in Richards' opinion? Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I would put "The Weight" and "The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down" up against anything the Stones ever did.
All these bands are great, all of them. It’s such a relative subject, who’s best, better, all that is dumb and childish at least. They all are part of the history of Rock & Roll, no one better than another, no one worse or less talented or whatever. If you don’t like a musical band, don’t listen to them…too easy, except for the whiners who enjoy whining more than listening to music. Whine on whiners, but do your whining elsewhere and let us non-whiners enjoy all the great bands.
52 years after the burials of the stones, after the iconic release of 'Exile on Main St.,' the Rolling Stones' legacy showed signs of decadence, as the once-revolutionary rock band grappled with the pressures of sustaining their legendary status amidst evolving music trends and personal turmoils.
I think that the problem Keith had with Creedance Clearwater Revival was that, to the person only listening to them on the radio or on vinyl, you were led to believe that the people in this band obviously are from the deep south. Of course they weren't, they were from sunny California ! And to some this could be considered cultural appropriation. Or to Keith, it was a false representation. Of course you could say that all rock music is cultural appropriation, because it is, however it's as if CCR took it too far. With most bands, they may play music in a style that mimics a region, but with CCR it kinda feels like you were sold a lie due to how closely they mimicked the sound of the south.
IMO, think Creedence paid homage to cajun music, and to roots rock, and to country, and to the blues. I think they're a great amalgamation of sounds that coalesce into something distinctive.
Sounds like Keith has only heard the CCR singles and not their albums. I'm surprised he didn't mention the Eagles. I can't think of any other hugely popular band that never strays from the sound of their records in live performances.
I'm with Keith when it comes to the DEAD and G AND R. HOWEVER,most of this griping is absolutely ridiculous,splitting the finest of super fine hairs. The more he explains the more nonsensical and contradictory he sounds. The classic STONES songs are still some of the best ever. They've simply hung on WAY TOO LONG.
Why anyone gives a fuck to what this guy says I don't know. Keith, some advice-Put out some great music like the Stones did with Brian Jones. NO JONES, NO STONES.
Keith could only maintain this RnR image because Mick took care of the dirty works .... Mick made sure the band and the song writers got their fair share in all those deals. I think Keith would be broke these days if it wasn't for Mick ....
@@markusaurelius777 You got me wrong .. of course they wrote great songs together, but Mick did more than writng only songs, he took care of marketing, negotiating and scoring astronomical deals with record companies, he made sure the doe would end on their accounts and not in phoney manager pockets
Agree with both of your comments above.The Band and CCR are among my all-time favorites. The Stones, too. It's too bad they can't all get along, but I'll find a way to survive. I like the Stones for their music, not their opinion of other bands.
The difficulty in Keith taking digs at some of the people mentioned here is how, among those who are still with us, a few of them have egos to match his. It wouldn't surprise me at all if some of them have watched this video already and wanted to counter attack Keith for having picked them apart. I would not be surprised if Bob Weir, Robert Plant, Garth Hudson, Axl Rose or John Fogerty locked horns with teeth while we still have all of them. I don't see John Paul Jones doing that; he's too mild-mannered.
All too often, @billwalsh388 , those who need no defense are the targets for those who go on the offensive. Keith here could have thought before he turned JPJ into collateral damage.
It has to do with the delivery, @Thin_Mercury , and I get the impression that Keith is a little bit smiling in his recitation of who and what he doesn't like. That's the kind of thing I have dealt with when I have played music myself, people who are either smug or baby like when they make it clear they don't like something.
Amazingly, I tend to agree with him on everything he said. I love Dylan though and Jimmy Page is a great guitarist. Bonzo Bonham's heavy drumming sounds like heavy duty rock n' roll. I like CCR but they are not as great as the Stones. I find Robert Plant likable, but his vocals in Led Zeppelin were a bit too much and over the top. Led Zeppelin's song writing skills are formulaic and Sophomoric. I like a few Grateful Dead songs, but their level of talent is below CCR.
Keith's points are mostly good - his dig at GnR was perfect - poseurs. The Band and the Dead, on the other hand, had so much more to offer than KR sees - still, his crits are on the mark.
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles.Thats why Keith hates dead that's a type of music Stones just didn't do well.
Keith Liked AC DC, and the Stones even had Malcom and Angus play with them on stage once. While there was respect there, Angus said that he didn't like a lot of the stones softer, RnB and and soulful and countryish music very much. Everyone has their preferences.
Loving the comment section! No love for Kieth; Mick Jagger is The Rolling Stones; Kieth Richards is the side show! Is he even considered in the top 20 top guitarist of all time? HELL NO not even close💪
@@briangulley6027Agree! His use of open G tuning was not necessarily new (slide players probably popularized it), but it was brilliantly applied and created his unique rhythm sound, which is so fat and rich. The Stones sound is largely due to Keith's rhythm playing, IMO.
This is another one of these fake "hate" videos, that these guys put out. The Band were tighter than the Stones. Creedencde never tried to be musical virtuosos. All I need to say about Keith is since 1969 he has not even been the lead guitarist in his own band. The Stones also are not great improvisors, without Charlie Wattsthey would have gone off the rocks in the 70's. The Stones only pretended to be the devil, Zepp was the genuine article.
Keith is a legend. He doesn't have to like all great groups, but we don't have to believe his critical views on these groups either. There are a number of Stones songs that are not masterpieces. Can't you hear me knocking is a rip off of Mountain's Mississippi Queen that was released a year earlier. Angie has always been a mediocre song. I love the Stones, CCR, Zeppelin, Dead and the Band for what they added to the Rock playlist.
What many might nor know or remember *the Stones and the Grateful Dead toured TOGETHER many times in the late 60's. Most famously it was THEIR tour together when 'the end of the 60's ALTAMONT' happened when a Hell's Angel hired guard killed a spectator mid Stones performance.* It was actually the Dead who had hired them as the Dead were friends with the Hell's angels and preferred them to the police. So Richard's opinion is VERY suspicious, especially since he NEVER MENTIONS THAT or their touring together. I wonder why?? Just like his opinion of Led Zeppelin and the others and like other bitter Brits, like Pete Townsend, his opinions strike me as supremely self serving. Nice he respects John Lennon also known for his acid tongue. But John could also be very loving as well. John's criticism were based on his honest opinions, rather than professional jealousy, agree or disagree.
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles.Thats why Keith hates dead that's a type of music Stones just didn't do well.
Appreciated; but that’s my point,when you consider to be in the top 5 discussion; good at one and mediocre at another,takes your criticism rights of others away✌️ The Man is out of bounds here imo.
Keith is so full of himself. I guess he learned nothing after being punched by Chuck Berry. Still love the Stones though. Ronnie Wood and the late Charlie Watts being my favorites.
Kieth Richards and Mick Jagger have been recycling the same shtick decade after decade and have never really evolved. Meanwhile after a string of five great albums the members of Led Zeppelin moved on and evolved. Look at Robert Plant, now doing work with bluegrass artist Alison Krause. I do have to agree with him about Guns and Roses though.
Plant is a goof. He slagged off Page after he wanted to tour again and Planty-Poo said doing Zep music is "Dinosaur Music"...but Planty-Poo plays Zep live wit his solo band - He's a Hypocrite. Plant was always too "girly" anyways.
This is an interesting video because Keith is highly qualified to to make comments about other famous rock bands. I'll include the Stones in this comment. I'm a 70 Y.O. American and have listened to all kinds of music, especially rock, since I was about 10 years old. I'd have to rate these bands in categories. With 5 stars the best and a 0 star the worst but I’ll keep it short on YT. Note that I like all the hits (5 Stars) by these bands except Guns and Roses that gets 0 stars. 1. How much do I want to listen to half of what the band played? The Stones - 5 The Band - 0 Dylan - 0 CCR - 0 The Dead - 0 Guns and Roses - 0 Led Zep - 5 2. How much do I want to listen to a 10th of what band played? The Stones - 5 The Band - 0 Dylan - 2 CCR - 1 The Dead - 0 Guns and Roses - 0 Led Zep - 5
Keith is the spirit of rock n roll - he's not arrogant he is loyal and respectful to the art form and his heros. Any real rocker will love and understand him.
Interesting from a group that does costume changes between every song 🤨 His dislike of bands that play too mechanical then rails against a band like GD that is the antithesis of mechanical is laughable Rolling Stones blues and "Southern" songs are cringe-worthy Lets not forget their foray into disco! What a HYPOCRITE!
You got to realise that much of his jealousy is financial. The Stones were ripped off badly in their glory years. Zeppelin had good management and became wealthy after two albums with a great recording contract. The Stones toured endlessly because they made dimes on the recordings.
Richards is a TERRIBLE guitar player, he's nothing but a below average rhythm guitarist. Apart from anything else, he doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles.Thats why Keith hates dead that's a type of music Stones just didn't do well.
I've always thought the Stones were one of the most overrated bands around. Sure they've had hits, but outside of the two or three decent songs on each of their earlier albums the rest were easily forgettable formulaic filler tracks. When you just mail it in on most of your songs it tends to water down your legacy. The last truly good album they released was Tattoo You in 1981 (43 years ago!!!!). These guys need to admit they're out of ideas and just call it quits. The only group on the list I agree with is the Grateful Dead. Awful, just awful.
Blame Mick for the decline in quality after tattoo you, he refuses to collaborate with Keith on songwriting and insists on pursuing trendy sounds and production instead of classic stones sound like Keith wants him to
@@Thin_Mercury Lowering the bar for "greatest" and "brilliant" shows the mentality of someone who either does not play guitar or has limited abilities.
@@lazur1 He has been married to the same woman for over 40 years and is adored by his friends and family. i have not seen a shred of evidence to indicate he is a jerk. people ask him his opinions and he answers honestly, what’s wrong with that?
Listened to this AI bollocks for 3 minutes and didn't find out any of the bands that Kieth supposedly hates. So I quit. What garbage.
This bloke is a expert at it I seen his rubbish before all ai dribble vote it down and report it
I’m a simple guy, I love simple rock and roll! Oh, like Creedence? No no, it has to be rhythmically interesting! Oh ok, like Zeppelin? Ew no, it has to be looser, not too heavy! Oh, like the Band, maybe? Ugh, no, it has to be improvised, playing off each other spontaneously! Oh I see, like the Dead. No, I hate them too.
Everyone who is picky about live performances should have had the good fortune of seeing the Allman Brothers in their prime.
So, only senior citizens.
@@lazur1 Of course. But every music lover of any age can listen to "Live at Fillmore East."
@@spidgeb3292 Indeed, I was referring to "...the good fortune of _seeing_ ..."
@@modernpolitics yeah that stuff about rhythmically interesting, sometimes hard to tell difference between street fighting man & honky tonk woman.
He just sounds like a jealous egomaniac who can't take either criticism or competition. The Rolling Stones have been bland, corporate rock for forty years now.
Jealous hahaha !!!
Grow up for Chrissakes!
why would he be jealous? also, the stones have been coroporate lately thanks to jagger not keith. He has said many times he wants to take the stones back to their roots instead of chasing trends.
I've always loved much of the music of the Stones, but Keith Richards has always been a bit of jealous douche of just about anyone unless they were and old blues player, ironically, one of his heroes, Chuck Berry, was pretty dismissive of Richards playing, Berry had the reputation of being difficult to get along with.
I've seen The Band with Dylan, CCR, and LZ (3 times in the 70s) and all of them sounded great live. Having only watched live footage of Stones shows, I don't necessarily care for how they change and present their songs in their concerts.
Stones haven't been great since Mick Taylor left.imitation
Keith has copied Chuck Berry his whole life
Exactly-the Stones were always (basically) just an R&B cover band.
Some Girls was the BEST album of the Ron Wood era. My FAVORITE Stones album, not a bad track on it.
Well said
mick taylor never wrote any of those songs so what’s your point?
Don’t remember any chuck berry riffs in open g
Coming from someone who prefers the simplicity of open G tuning.
the ultimate compliment to Zeppelin is Page appears on at least one Stones Album and parts of Pages work with Keith has subsequently been released as "Scarlet"
Keith's the Goldilocks of rock: "The Band's too tight", "The Dead's too loose", "The Stones are juuust right".
Keith is a caricature of himself these days, a shy man trying to be a tough rock God and the bands he dislikes only proves he doesn't appreciate rock and roll.
He was wrong about Zep - for sure.
@@markusaurelius777 How? Led Zeppelin are music thiefs
so man is automatically shy because openly shares his opinions on music? your logic is bizarre.
Keith looks every bit his 80 years. The fact that he toured the world at 80 supporting a new album is amazing, even if he had led a clean, quiet life of moderation.
@@spidgeb3292 he looks 90
@@lazur1 No, he looks 79.
@@MartinusBremerus i'm sorry to hear that you know anyone who looked like this at 79. My dad looked better than Keith at age 95.
@@lazur1 I don't care how old looks someone - that was the reason for my message.
@@MartinusBremerus Ah. I don't care either, not for people I don't really know. If a friend looked 10yrs older than they were, I'd try to help them get healthy. Anyway, care or not, I'm not blind, & neither are you.
I just think it’s a competition thing with Richards,who I didn’t think was a top five or a top ten performer.The Stones were a solid band with solid ,body moving songs. LZ,CCR,Dylan and the Band are just different in their approach to entertainment.You don’t have to jump all over the stage to impress your audience,they come to listen primarily.The Rolling Stones were a spectacle.Sorry Keith,you don’t have to show your ass to impress anyone….just play well.
For me, when I go to see a live band, I want to see how well they engage the crowd with interesting dynamics, surprises in the arrangement, highlighting different musicians and improvised solos that delight the crowd. That's why I go to a show. Live music can be a life-changing experience for the audience, winning new lifetime fans and thrilling the faithful, if the artists take advantage of it.
@@spidgeb3292 Some surprises are bad surprises. 1/I saw the band Argent, to hear organist Rod Argent's perfect playing. There's a magical organ fill on one of his songs that he didn't bother to play live. The best part of the song, gone. 2/Roy Buchanan ended an instrumental w/a simulated steel-guitar riff, by wrapping his little finger around his Telecaster's volume knob, while bending multiple strings. Live, he lit a cigarette instead, while the band ended the song without him. Again, the best part of the song, gone, for a joke. If I like the record, I wanna hear what made me like the record. What passes for 'improvisation', in many cases, just isn't very good.
@@lazur1 Very true. I've experienced the same thing, especially with traveling blues musicians, who will use organ, horns, etc. on their recordings, but travel as a 3-piece. That can be a letdown. I've left some of my favorite blues players' shows early because their sound was just flat and empty relative to the recordings. Plus, there are bad nights. Bob Dylan, e.g., had a LOT of bad nights, but I think he felt contempt for his audience and humanity in general.That said, the excitement from live music, seeing art created in real time, for me is unbeatable, especially when the band is actually striving to entertain vs. just getting it over with. I've seen many more of the former than of the latter I'm much more likely to enjoy the live show much more than the recordings. Mumford and Sons and Avett Brothers come to mind as bands I've seen that blew me away live, even though I wasn't a fan of their recordings.
You notice he didn't talk trash about the DOORS...
keith richards a second rate guitarist, very famous but a clown and extrovert, criticizing is an insult.
keith richard’s is responsible for some of the greatest riffs in rock history. His primary strength was always as a songwriter though.
Comedian: "When Keith was 40, he looked 70. Now that he's 80, he still looks 70."
Someone should teach the AI bot about redundancy - how many times do we need it pointed out that Keef is opinionated. This is a 10 minute video that could have been two.
Yeah, it reminds me of Jeremy Wade on an episode of River Monsters.
IIRC Keith Richards is RnR rebel enough to refuse a Knighthood. Then go on to criticize Mick Jagger for accepting a Knighthood
Agreed abut the dead..
The dead released some good studio albums but were alas, as Keef said....boring in concert.
@ernestofranklin1891
@thefuzzboxx1018
I agree with both of you, and with him. I saw the Dead a couple of times back in '81 and '82. I had a lot of fun that was less about their musicianship than it was about getting very, very high, preferably on acid or mescaline and the like, with a few thousand like-minded people.
About 10 years ago a radio station that I often listened to aired a syndicated Grateful Dead show every week. This particular show specialized in getting their hands on high-quality bootleg recordings of their live shows, which the band famously encouraged.
When they were playing songs, they were fine. Not especially inspired or inspiring, but nothing wrong with them either. But every show included at least one of the Space Jams that they were also known for.
So here I am, still and always a music lover, listening to them at my home on Sunday nights, no drugs in me, no party around me, and you know how people will sometimes say, "You had to be there!"? Well, "they" were right. You DID have to be there. At least, in order to appreciate anything about those jams. Which were not just the length of a song btw - they would last 20 or 25 minutes. Just a total waste.
The people who were choosing to play that stuff on the radio? I would have to guess that they were massively stoned, and expecting their audience to be doing the same. I can't think of any other excuse, except one: It's entirely possible that these people were essentially brainwashing themselves into believing that there was something of great value in those jams, and if you didn't get it, that was your own fault for not being hip enough.
Which is not something you'd want to admit to, right? So they kept airing this noise that was never actually meant to be aired in the first place. Which if I was hearing Keith correctly was the source of his main complaint about them.
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles
Why would any musician or band care about this relics stamp of approval . The stones were a bunch of Londoners living in a rainy island like Britain who sounded like they came from the deep south in America . Everything from Richards stolen American blues riffs to jagger nasal American accent was pure americana.
While the Beatles were a blues band to a degree they didn't sing with stupid American accents and their music had a certain English sound at least on some of their records . Or to put it more accurately unlike the stones they sounded like they could have come from anywhere .
You must be a young punk. You know nothing. Lady Jane , As Tears Go By, Paint It Black among about 100 other songs I could name by the Stones are Americana? Do you hear an American accent on Lady Jane or Ruby Tuesday??? As far as guitar playing with 5 strings no less again you proudly show how absent facts are from your tiny world. Man you better just go away, you don't know JACK.
what a load of nonsense you just spewed.
13th cousin. We share a great grampa from about 500 years ago. Great guitarist.
The Stones are vastly overrated and always have been.
They dont even make this list and nobody woul d mention Richard
The reason Keith Richards is still able to tour at the age of eighty is he's always been a man of moderation.
Except when he was a ruthless heroin junkie hanging with the likes of junkie John Philips for years.
Keith is a blues guitarist at heart!!
Having a go at CCR sounds to me like jealousy and well founded at that, heh
Jealous of CCR? LMAO. Richards' Legendary status far surpasses CCR.
No Keith gets jealous,Rumor was always that he fired Mick Taylor from jealousy,Taylor was guitarist on best stones albums
Same with the dead,The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles
Keith has plenty of the Green-eyed Monster in him....
I don't think he's envious. I don't think he'd have anything to be envious of, in the music of these other bands. I think that something which can sound a lot like envy, but isn't, is the perspective of someone who had been playing and recording music professionally for most of a decade before any of those bands came along (closer to 3 in the case of GnR) and is listening to people who are both his peers and his competitors.
He didn't really put any of them down, exactly, except GnR, for copying his and other originals' style, which is fair enough. He kept saying things like "They just didn't do anything for me", which is also fair enough, considering that he could hardly be coming from anywhere other than that perspective.
Story is he fired Mick Taylor out of jealousy guitarist for best stones albums
The man knows about rock´n´roll. He is entitled to have his opinion. I love his honesty and have been a fan since I was 14 years old. 🤩
He can like or not like who he wants to... Interestingly enough, I didn't like the Rolling Stones until I was in my late teens and then I met my best friend who loved them and I grew to appreciate them and love them. My surprise is his discontent with Led Zeppelin. Bands have a lead singer which ultimately can make or break a band, then they have great musicians as far as playing instruments and then they all write great songs together. The thing about Robert Plant, is that his voice was the ultimate and an incredible instrument all on it's own. Sorry, but anyone that doesn't acknowledge that, I question their opinion, hearing ability or maybe just outright jealousy???
What did the Deadhead say when he ran out of drugs? "Damn, this band is boring".
GD sucks.
You are mentioning "drugs" in a video with Keith Richards? Keith probably did more drugs than the whole Grateful Dead band combined. As for sheer creativity, the Stones could not approach the Dead. The Stones were just doing the blues.
Hilarious! You win!
"....and where am I?"
a joke that's only a stereotype...this Deadhead still loves The Stones. And we Deadheads don't run out of drugs. And one of the reasons we do drugs is because life isn't so boring with a little mental aid upon occasion. Signed 400 plus GD shows later...
"I'd rather hear a good copier than a bad original." (Mike Bloomfield)
Amen! What's funny is that Bloomfield inspired a lot of the greats in his life. And still does.
@@spidgeb3292Lesser known fact: When the Butterfield Band moved to California, the Grateful Dead were just a 'regular' band. Garcia'd been an acoustic player up until a minute before. When they heard Bloomfield on 'East West', a light went on: "We can do that!".
@@lazur1 Cool! I didn't know that! Thanks!
@@lazur1 Love that album.
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles.Thats why Keith hates dead that's a type of music Stones just didn't do well.
If anyone has read his book then you can get an inkling of where he is coming from, which btw doesn’t make him right being that the Stones themselves have drifted off the rock and roll originality more than a few times, and in my opinion at least haven’t made a decent album since Tattoo you!
Tatoo you were older songs in the can as they say. Rehashed them.
That is Mick Jaggers fault because he insists on trying to keep them sounding trendy. Keef has always hated the overproduced nonsense Mick stuffs into the post tattoo you stuff
Keith: Page kicked your ass... Led Zep kicked Stoner ass 1968- 80...Period.
Deep Purple was biggest touring band in world '71-'73 No hard rock band put out a better string of LPs than In Rock, Fireball, Machine Head and Made In Japan.
@cuda426hemi D. P. was good... Led Zep.was great...
@@cuda426hemi I might add Burn to that list, although I don't know if it was part of the consecutive string.
@@richprokop5155 Mk II DP OWNED Zep -more money bigger tours from about '70 to '72. 👀
@@spidgeb3292 Burn was GREAT but we must call that DP Mk III band; the Mk II DP is the one that schooled Zep for first couple years 🎸
There will always be a little bad blood between Stones and the Dead from Altamont. Everyone trying to blame others for the clusterf&#$. And their whole approach to music is opposite.
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles.Thats why Keith hates dead that's a type of music Stones just didn't do well.
I have long said I am far less suprised that Jim Morrison died at 27 yrs old then I am that Keith Richards is still alive.
Ha. Keef is a pretender and was pissed off that Creedence outsold the Stones by a factor of 4 for 4 years. Fogerty eats him musically for breakfast
Wow, outsold the Stones for 4 years, impressive. What about the 50+ years? How many arenas did CCR/Fogerty sell out this year? I like CCR but most of their songs are pretty samey, stylistic diversity is not exactly their strong suit. FWIW I’d hardly call the writer of many of the most iconic riffs in rock music a “pretender” but each to his own.
@@englishjim6428 Fair enough Jim on the stadiums, but you make the mistake many do with CCR with the 'samey' thang. Anybody who can write, sing, play on, arrange, produce, git, piano, organ, sax, harmonica, yazoo even on songs as diverse as Born on the Bayou to Born to Move, Porterville, Penthouse Pauper to Proud Mary, It's just a thought to Commotion, Rockin all Over the World to Hideaway, Fortunate Son to Old Man Down the Road, Cross Tie Walker to Long as I can see the Light is anything but 'samey' (ya don't know half of those songs do ya Jim?). I think Fogerty is a far more rounded musician than Keef, and I got plenty of Stones in my collection.When in N'awins I go down to the same bar that Mick and Keef roll along to when in N'awlins, and there are plenty of musicians there who are way above Keef and Mick's abilities, but never 'made it'. Those open G riffs he made are pretty great, but so a is Fogerty playing in his D tuning for "that" CCR sound, both of them backed by great rhythm sections..Each to their own as you say, but Keef was moaning about CCR when they were at their peak, probably in a hazy drug induced, head sauced snozzle, not in 2024. Of course, he and Mick, later invited Fogerty to come along and play with them somewhere in Cali. Good UA-cam of it out there.
And BTW, Mick Taylor, enormous respect, commented that he had to whip the Stones into shape musically and even Bill Wyman claims that Keef 'borrowed' some of his much vaunted killer riffs from him, that was probably what I was alluding to with the 'pretender' thing, along with his faux, 'look at how out there I am" drug behaviour, a bit way OTT, IMHO.
@ FWIW I saw them (second show) at the Albert Hall in 1970 (if I recall correctly). I actually went to see Booker T and the MGs who opened for them but stayed for most of their set. It was pretty good. I have all of their decent albums (4 or 5 maybe) not including a couple of live ones. They were a good band that was very popular for a few years. As a professional musician for over 50 years I’ve probably played most of their catalog at one time or another, not an especially challenging task btw. Thanks for being so patronizing, makes me feel young again.
Keith is the rock goat
keith is a contradiction of his own criticism, the Stones are BORING AS BASEBALL
Keith Richards is a wet-brained wash-up who never plays the same thing because he CAN'T! There's difference between what Eddie Van Halen did so effortlessly and what Richards never did outside the recording studio. EXAMPLE: The simplistic sonic layering of the intro to Gimme Shelter. Beautiful. Genius. Never, ever to be heard again in a live performance. Why? He can't play it obviously. Recording studio trickery. All of it. So of course Keith hates anyone who can do, what Keith can't.
lol, van halen is 80s trash. all show and no substance.
Agree 100%, especially Grateful Dead boring country bumpkin music and Led Zeppelin, great Band but never ever the Best.
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles.Thats why Keith hates dead that's a type of music Stones just didn't do well.
I agree with everything Kieth said about these Bands more so CCR....Boring shit,
So, The Band is too precise while The Grateful Dead were meandering? Basically, every band except the Stones were sub-par in Richards' opinion?
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I would put "The Weight" and "The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down" up against anything the Stones ever did.
All these bands are great, all of them. It’s such a relative subject, who’s best, better, all that is dumb and childish at least. They all are part of the history of Rock & Roll, no one better than another, no one worse or less talented or whatever. If you don’t like a musical band, don’t listen to them…too easy, except for the whiners who enjoy whining more than listening to music. Whine on whiners, but do your whining elsewhere and let us non-whiners enjoy all the great bands.
@@GeraldCummings-d3z But Keith gotta whine and his fabois gotta worship him.
lol, ok
52 years after the burials of the stones, after the iconic release of 'Exile on Main St.,' the Rolling Stones' legacy showed signs of decadence, as the once-revolutionary rock band grappled with the pressures of sustaining their legendary status amidst evolving music trends and personal turmoils.
No, it's only your opinion. "Exile on Main St." wasn't the end.
I think that the problem Keith had with Creedance Clearwater Revival was that, to the person only listening to them on the radio or on vinyl, you were led to believe that the people in this band obviously are from the deep south. Of course they weren't, they were from sunny California ! And to some this could be considered cultural appropriation. Or to Keith, it was a false representation. Of course you could say that all rock music is cultural appropriation, because it is, however it's as if CCR took it too far. With most bands, they may play music in a style that mimics a region, but with CCR it kinda feels like you were sold a lie due to how closely they mimicked the sound of the south.
IMO, think Creedence paid homage to cajun music, and to roots rock, and to country, and to the blues. I think they're a great amalgamation of sounds that coalesce into something distinctive.
Then I guess Keith must hate the early Stones for copying Chicago blues.
Sounds like Keith has only heard the CCR singles and not their albums. I'm surprised he didn't mention the Eagles. I can't think of any other hugely popular band that never strays from the sound of their records in live performances.
I'm with Keith when it comes to the DEAD and G AND R. HOWEVER,most of this griping is absolutely ridiculous,splitting the finest of super fine hairs. The more he explains the more nonsensical and contradictory he sounds. The classic STONES songs are still some of the best ever. They've simply hung on WAY TOO LONG.
I was going to agree with Keith until he slagged Zeppelin...
Jealousy. All it is, Led Zep burst onto the scene & stole the spotlight and someone could never handle it.
He's bang on....overblown plagiarists! Just ripped off all those blues men , over n over again!
@@Robyn-by6qt 😂
@@Robyn-by6qt So did the Stones. So did Clapton. So did ever Blues musician who followed them.
@@joeniccoli1916 Led Zeppelin are blowhard plagerists
Wow, I'm imagining you love to hear yourself talk.
Why anyone gives a fuck to what this guy says I don't know. Keith, some advice-Put out some great music like the Stones did with Brian Jones. NO JONES, NO STONES.
Keith could only maintain this RnR image because Mick took care of the dirty works .... Mick made sure the band and the song writers got their fair share in all those deals. I think Keith would be broke these days if it wasn't for Mick ....
Incorrect. They wrote as a team and their songs are legendary. The Stones would be nothing without Keith or Mick.
@@markusaurelius777 You got me wrong .. of course they wrote great songs together, but Mick did more than writng only songs, he took care of marketing, negotiating and scoring astronomical deals with record companies, he made sure the doe would end on their accounts and not in phoney manager pockets
Check out what Craig Ferguson said
At this point, who cares. Keith is Keith, he talks a lot. Love his guitar work, saw the Stones in Seattle 2019. Nothing special.
Good evening, I am aware of the casualty-free war between English pop and the USA. I have a preference for English groups.
I love Keith Richards and his opinions, he likes the raw energy and heart of where Rock originated from
I’ve always thought I just had bad taste. Now I see it’s not just me.
I don't think its just that Keith hates these groups but just doesnt understand the hype and fandom around them.
The Band is great. Keith's a jerk.
Agree with both of your comments above.The Band and CCR are among my all-time favorites. The Stones, too. It's too bad they can't all get along, but I'll find a way to survive. I like the Stones for their music, not their opinion of other bands.
Keith's a great bloke. He's always been cool in interviews. insanely great writer and his playing style is his own - very original.
Keith is well known as a very nice guy actually. He is entitled to like and dislike whatever he wants, that does not make him rude
The difficulty in Keith taking digs at some of the people mentioned here is how, among those who are still with us, a few of them have egos to match his. It wouldn't surprise me at all if some of them have watched this video already and wanted to counter attack Keith for having picked them apart. I would not be surprised if Bob Weir, Robert Plant, Garth Hudson, Axl Rose or John Fogerty locked horns with teeth while we still have all of them. I don't see John Paul Jones doing that; he's too mild-mannered.
John Paul Jones needs no defense!
All too often, @billwalsh388 , those who need no defense are the targets for those who go on the offensive. Keith here could have thought before he turned JPJ into collateral damage.
Why do you automatically assume someone has an ego because they are open about what music they like and dislike?
It has to do with the delivery, @Thin_Mercury , and I get the impression that Keith is a little bit smiling in his recitation of who and what he doesn't like. That's the kind of thing I have dealt with when I have played music myself, people who are either smug or baby like when they make it clear they don't like something.
Amazingly, I tend to agree with him on everything he said. I love Dylan though and Jimmy Page is a great guitarist. Bonzo Bonham's heavy drumming sounds like heavy duty rock n' roll. I like CCR but they are not as great as the Stones. I find Robert Plant likable, but his vocals in Led Zeppelin were a bit too much and over the top. Led Zeppelin's song writing skills are formulaic and Sophomoric. I like a few Grateful Dead songs, but their level of talent is below CCR.
Keith's points are mostly good - his dig at GnR was perfect - poseurs. The Band and the Dead, on the other hand, had so much more to offer than KR sees - still, his crits are on the mark.
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles.Thats why Keith hates dead that's a type of music Stones just didn't do well.
This man looks like 10 miles of bad road.
He just looks old because he’s old, what’s your point? if anything keith looks better than mick these days
Keith Liked AC DC, and the Stones even had Malcom and Angus play with them on stage once. While there was respect there, Angus said that he didn't like a lot of the stones softer, RnB and and soulful and countryish music very much. Everyone has their preferences.
How can you not like Dead Flowers
Loving the comment section! No love for Kieth; Mick Jagger is The Rolling Stones; Kieth Richards is the side show! Is he even considered in the top 20 top guitarist of all time? HELL NO not even close💪
As a technical player I agree with you, many guys are better, but as a riff master Keith is the best.
@@briangulley6027Agree! His use of open G tuning was not necessarily new (slide players probably popularized it), but it was brilliantly applied and created his unique rhythm sound, which is so fat and rich. The Stones sound is largely due to Keith's rhythm playing, IMO.
what's yer view on Kieth Moon or Kieth Partrage?
Keith is an AMAZING song writer and his rhythm is crazy good. If you got no rhythm...you ain't got Jack shit.
@@briangulley6027 Agreed.
This is another one of these fake "hate" videos, that these guys put out. The Band were tighter than the Stones. Creedencde never tried to be musical virtuosos. All I need to say about Keith is since 1969 he has not even been the lead guitarist in his own band. The Stones also are not great improvisors, without Charlie Wattsthey would have gone off the rocks in the 70's. The Stones only pretended to be the devil, Zepp was the genuine article.
Seems like everyone don't like Led Zeppelin,Keith Richards,The Who,etc. Led Zeppelin is my opinion one of the greatest bands ever.
Yeah how can you knock Bonham?
💚❤️💛💜💙
Keith is a legend. He doesn't have to like all great groups, but we don't have to believe his critical views on these groups either. There are a number of Stones songs that are not masterpieces. Can't you hear me knocking is a rip off of Mountain's Mississippi Queen that was released a year earlier. Angie has always been a mediocre song. I love the Stones, CCR, Zeppelin, Dead and the Band for what they added to the Rock playlist.
What many might nor know or remember *the Stones and the Grateful Dead toured TOGETHER many times in the late 60's. Most famously it was THEIR tour together when 'the end of the 60's ALTAMONT' happened when a Hell's Angel hired guard killed a spectator mid Stones performance.* It was actually the Dead who had hired them as the Dead were friends with the Hell's angels and preferred them to the police. So Richard's opinion is VERY suspicious, especially since he NEVER MENTIONS THAT or their touring together. I wonder why?? Just like his opinion of Led Zeppelin and the others and like other bitter Brits, like Pete Townsend, his opinions strike me as supremely self serving. Nice he respects John Lennon also known for his acid tongue. But John could also be very loving as well. John's criticism were based on his honest opinions, rather than professional jealousy, agree or disagree.
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles.Thats why Keith hates dead that's a type of music Stones just didn't do well.
pretty cool views, but, trying to take down Led is stupid! the stones are no match for the greatest R&R bank of all time!
I was gonna take shots at Mick's singing but it was too easy. The real Heart of Rock n Roll is still made of beef jerky hail hail Keith Richards.
I like all these bands except g&r but he’s got a point about most of them. There is no perfect band, no matter how much you love them.
Keith, as usual, is 100% correct
Appreciated; but that’s my point,when you consider to be in the top 5 discussion; good at one and mediocre at another,takes your criticism rights of others away✌️ The Man is out of bounds here imo.
At 30 Richards already sounded and looked like the “get off my lawn guy”.
Keith is so full of himself. I guess he learned nothing after being punched by Chuck Berry. Still love the Stones though. Ronnie Wood and the late Charlie Watts being my favorites.
Kieth Richards and Mick Jagger have been recycling the same shtick decade after decade and have never really evolved. Meanwhile after a string of five great albums the members of Led Zeppelin moved on and evolved. Look at Robert Plant, now doing work with bluegrass artist Alison Krause. I do have to agree with him about Guns and Roses though.
Plant is a goof. He slagged off Page after he wanted to tour again and Planty-Poo said doing Zep music is "Dinosaur Music"...but Planty-Poo plays Zep live wit his solo band - He's a Hypocrite. Plant was always too "girly" anyways.
Really shitty AI writing .
Keith, I love you man but come on....The Dead were a serious act.
Got a tip for you my man......if ya don't like it don't listen to it. Duh.
Who cares what Keith thinks.
I find some Stones songs annoying.
Who cares what Old Keith hates they probably hated him LOL !!!
This is an interesting video because Keith is highly qualified to to make comments about other famous rock bands. I'll include the Stones in this comment.
I'm a 70 Y.O. American and have listened to all kinds of music, especially rock, since I was about 10 years old. I'd have to rate these bands in categories. With 5 stars the best and a 0 star the worst but I’ll keep it short on YT.
Note that I like all the hits (5 Stars) by these bands except Guns and Roses that gets 0 stars.
1. How much do I want to listen to half of what the band played?
The Stones - 5
The Band - 0
Dylan - 0
CCR - 0
The Dead - 0
Guns and Roses - 0
Led Zep - 5
2. How much do I want to listen to a 10th of what band played?
The Stones - 5
The Band - 0
Dylan - 2
CCR - 1
The Dead - 0
Guns and Roses - 0
Led Zep - 5
Stones music got boring a long time ago.
that’s mick jaggers fault, he writes all the songs these days and fails to consult keith who is largely checked out
keith and the boys haven,t made any new music in 50 years. Hypocrite!
The rolling stones very successful but their music is rubbish and most of the bands this grug addict hates are much better than his.
You're not too bright are you?
Keith is the spirit of rock n roll - he's not arrogant he is loyal and respectful to the art form and his heros. Any real rocker will love and understand him.
This video is a waste. Gave it 5 min and goodbye
Interesting from a group that does costume changes between every song 🤨
His dislike of bands that play too mechanical then rails against a band like GD that is the antithesis of mechanical is laughable
Rolling Stones blues and "Southern" songs are cringe-worthy
Lets not forget their foray into disco!
What a HYPOCRITE!
Gratefuk Dead sucks. Boring 20 minute jams. *Yawn*
@@markusaurelius777 miss your meds?
Your opinion means less than Zero!
You got to realise that much of his jealousy is financial. The Stones were ripped off badly in their glory years. Zeppelin had good management and became wealthy after two albums with a great recording contract. The Stones toured endlessly because they made dimes on the recordings.
I imagine the Stones grossed more over their careers than Zeppelin. Hell, they're still touring!
Net Worth: Keith Richards, 500 million. Jimmy Page,190 million. I'm sure Keith's ok with that.
AI narration, over and over. 👎
Richards is a TERRIBLE guitar player, he's nothing but a below average rhythm guitarist. Apart from anything else, he doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.
Amazing writer and a great rhythm player. YOU have no clue what you are talking about.
Certainly agree about the band and the dead and lz.
He was wrong about Zep.
The dead were psychedelic the stones were never good psychedelic band they hated their acid rock album forced on them by record company to compete with Beatles.Thats why Keith hates dead that's a type of music Stones just didn't do well.
Zeppelin's only 1000x better than the Stones
This is absolute clickbiat nonsense. AI is destroying UA-cam and this video is a perfect example of it.
I've always thought the Stones were one of the most overrated bands around. Sure they've had hits, but outside of the two or three decent songs on each of their earlier albums the rest were easily forgettable formulaic filler tracks. When you just mail it in on most of your songs it tends to water down your legacy. The last truly good album they released was Tattoo You in 1981 (43 years ago!!!!). These guys need to admit they're out of ideas and just call it quits. The only group on the list I agree with is the Grateful Dead. Awful, just awful.
Blame Mick for the decline in quality after tattoo you, he refuses to collaborate with Keith on songwriting and insists on pursuing trendy sounds and production instead of classic stones sound like Keith wants him to
AS FIRST SORRY I'm NOT Eng word but musicanword becuz Iplay DRM U I respect U ASrockmusic testament keeppush iton
Well, he isn't as good of a guitar player as he thinks he is. His ego is huge, and is certainly not justified. What a tool!
Amazing song writer and a great rhythm guitarist. You're clueless.
The WHO was BETTER than Led Zeppelin.
does keith like the black crowes
gnr was on stage with the stones
Greatful Dead worst band ever.
Your Video is a waste of time.
Keith has no right to be above tbese musicians who are more talented than him, they can writw sings, can sing, play instruments unlike u
So you totally ignore the music Keith composed in those early years? I would compare his work to any except Bob Dylan.....
But I don't care about what a bloated ego hates.
Found this amusing... who gives a fck what Richards thinks?
You cared enough to cry about him ...LMAO !!! boohoo.
@@markusaurelius777 - he's a goof
you obviously care lol
The only person that thinks keefs opinion matters is keef.bad ,sloppy guitar player.Mediocre song writer at best except Angie.
Keith is the greatest riff master in rock history and is a brilliant songwriter, you are clueless
@@Thin_Mercury Lowering the bar for "greatest" and "brilliant" shows the mentality of someone who either does not play guitar or has limited abilities.
@@fraudithis9400 lol you are one of those types are you?
@ The truth is hard to deal with when someone gets lost in their own opinions.
@@fraudithis9400 thats a very ironic statement coming from you
CCR's great. Keith's a jerk.
CCR is crap...boring.
Disliking a band does not make a person a jerk my guy
@@Baron-Larrey Correct. Keith's just a jerk.
@@lazur1 He has been married to the same woman for over 40 years and is adored by his friends and family. i have not seen a shred of evidence to indicate he is a jerk. people ask him his opinions and he answers honestly, what’s wrong with that?