Dear Rana sir congratulation for this truth history information, your are the teacher, In crucial thing unity, In important thing dignity,In all thing generosity. With my deep respect: Mr Kishor Kumar Sunuwar UK
𑀲𑀩𑁆 𑀩𑁂 𑀩𑀼𑀤𑁆𑀥𑀲𑁆𑀲 𑀩𑀺𑀫𑁆 𑀩𑁂 𑀲𑀓𑀮𑀤𑀲𑀤𑀺𑀲𑁂 𑀓𑁂𑀲𑀮𑁄 𑀫𑀸 𑀤𑀺 𑀥𑀸𑀢𑀼𑀁 𑀯𑀁 𑀤𑁂 𑀲𑀩𑁆 𑀩𑁂𑀧𑀺 𑀩𑀼𑀤𑀥𑀁 𑀤𑀲𑀩𑀮𑀢𑀦𑀼𑀚𑀁 𑀩𑁄𑀥𑀺𑀘𑁂𑀢𑁆𑀢𑀺𑀬𑀁 𑀦𑀫𑀸𑀫𑀺 𑀯𑀁𑀤𑀸𑀫𑀺. 𑀘𑁂𑀢𑀺𑀬𑀁 𑀲𑀩𑁆𑀩𑀁 𑀲𑀩𑁆𑀩𑀝𑁆𑀞𑀸𑀦𑁂𑀲𑀼 𑀧𑀢𑀺𑀝𑁆𑀞𑀺𑀢𑀁 𑀲𑀸𑀭𑀻 𑀭𑀺𑀓 𑀥𑀸𑀢𑀼 𑀫𑀳𑀸𑀩𑁄𑀥𑀺 𑀩𑀼𑀤𑁆𑀥𑀭𑀼 𑀧𑀁 𑀲𑀓𑀮𑀁 𑀲𑀤𑀸 🙏🙏🙏 To all the images of Buddha, in all ten directions, to even hairs and other relics, I give honour. To the Ten Powers of the Buddha, to the Cairn of Bodhi, I give honour. Greetings every stupa, that may stand in any place, The relics, the Great Bodhi, and Buddha forms everywhere!🙏🙏🙏
त्यस बेला बौद्ध धर्मको प्रख्यातिले बौखलायका हिन्दुहरु जसरी भयपनी बौद्ध धर्म सिध्याउने मनस्थितिमा रहेको बेला आदि शंकराचार्यले बौद्ध विद्वानहरुलाइ शास्त्रार्थ गरि जितेको भए शास्त्रार्थ गरेको विषय त्यसमा गरेका प्रश्न त्यस्को उतर सहितको ठुलो ग्रन्थ लेख्थ्यो होला किनकि त्यस बेला सम्म भारतबर्ष मा राजाहरु अधिकान्स हिन्दु थिए । त्यो त गरेन। त्यसको अर्थ शास्त्रार्थ गरेकै छैन । गरेको भए मिलिन्द्र प्रश्न जस्तै ग्रन्थ हुनु पर्ने हो त्यसबेलाको प्रचलन अनुसार । गुरुले भन्नु भए जस्तै सेना लगायर बुद्ध धर्म मासेको हो। गुरुले अस्पस्त कुरालाइ स्पष्ट गरि व्याख्या गरिदिनु भयो ।साधु साधु!साधु
Thanks Rinpoche Rana Ratnashree for explaining this historical fact about Adi Shankaracharya and his role in suppressing the buddhist religion in India by the use of violent means. Buddhism faced a great setback in second century BCE following the atrocities committed by Pushyamitra Sung (who had established the brahmin Sung dynasty) against buddhists. However, it somehow managed to survive and even flourished in the succeeding periods thanks to the support extended to buddhist monks and viharas by kings like Kaniska, Harsabardhan of Kannauj and Pal kings of Bengal. There were great centres of buddhist learning such as Nalanda Maha vihar. The famous Chinese Buddhist Scholar Xuanzang studied at Nalanda for several years under Venerable Silabhadra in the 7th century CE. There was a strong tradition of religious discourses and debates at that time. King Harsabardhan had organized a great assembly of scholars participated in by Hindu, Jain and Buddhist scholars in which the visiting scholar Xuanzang was also invited to participate. Given the prevailing intellectual environment at that time it is highly improbable that any philosophical debate in 8th century CE between Shankaracharya and Buddihist scholars would have passed unnoticed. Infact historical records show that Shakaracharya had debated with Hindu philosophers of different schools the most notable being his debate with Mandana Mishra of Mithila who was a disciple of Kumarila Bhatta (purba mimamsa school). After losing in debate Mandana Mishra acknowledged the superiority of Shankara's vedanta doctrine and became his disciple.
@@thirdeye7136 What Puri Sankharacarya is saying is wrong. Pracchanna-Bauddha was the title given by the proponent of Dvaita-Vedanta, Bhaskaracarya. And, Puri Shankaracarya didn't understand the meaning of Sunyata, just like Adi Sankharacarya. Further, when Vyaakarana and Nirukti are different, the meaning of the word is also different. Panini says that there are two types of Sanskrit: Chandaso and Laukiki. Buddgist use Laukiki, hence their interpretations of the word/concepts are different. Anyway, these people are so dishonest, they don't even speak the truth. Hypocrites!
@@bibeksharma270 when buddhists became communist then you will understand very nicely . You even don't know whome you are telling buddha . So important is to find yourself . Be the candel yourself .
@@thirdeye7136 I know the Buddha and his teachings well, because not only I am a scholar of Buddhism, but I also practice Buddhism under an authentic Buddhist guru of a proper lineage. I read these texts in Sanakrit, Chinese and Pali itself. Therefore, you and such hypocrite Hindu gurus as the one who have no idea at all what the Buddha taught. 😀
@@thirdeye7136 That proves nothing.Even many Hindu Gurus and Pundits have given wrong information on Buddha dhamma and Shakyamuni time after time. Calling Shakyamuni as Hindu god's avatar is false claim and narrative by the Hindu Gurus from the get go.Do not even start this debate,you are going to lose in every angles
सुभम्ङ्गल तासिधेलिग गुरु जि म एउटा प्रस्न गर्न चाहान्छु गुरु जि एस्को जोबाब दिनु होला गुरु जि प्रस्न यो छ पैला कुन धर्म आएको थियोे र हिन्दु या बुद्ध पिलिज यस्को जोबाब दिए मा आभारी हुने थे गुरु
शंकर चर्या भनेको अहिले तपाईं हामी अगाडि बोल्नु हुने राणा रिम्पोचे काे तुलनामा भन्नु पर्दा राणा रिम्पोचेको 4भागमा एक भाग पनि ज्ञान र सिद्धा छैन शंकर चर्या मा।मैले हिन्दु पुराण शास्त्र अध्ययन गर्दा शंकर चर्या काे चरित्र अलिक दानवीय प्रवितिको देखे भने गुरू गोरखनाथ एक सामान रूपी करुणा भएको सिद्ध ब्यक्ति को रूपमा बुझे। भन्नु पर्दा हिन्दु हरू ले जो जलन्दर राछस् भन्दा पनि नीच पाप कर्म गर्न पछि नपर्ने ब्यक्ति शंकर चर्या थियो । अब आफैं बुझ्नु त्यस्ता फ्याउरो चोरी डकैती गर्ने पाप कर्म गर्न पछि नपर्ने ब्यक्ति संकर्चर्य बौद्ध धर्म सँग तुलना गर्ने ब्यक्ति मानसिक असतुलान ब्यक्ति हुनु पर्छ कि अज्ञान ब्यक्ति हरु काे भनाइ हुनु पर्छ जो लाई केही थाहा नभएको अरुको भ्रम कुराको पछि विस्वास गरेको ब्यक्ति हुनु पर्छ। तसर्थ शंकर चर्या भनेको अहिलेका इन्डियाका सद गुरू भन्ने एक पशु ब्यक्ति छ जसलाई बुद्ध धर्म सम्बन्धि केही थाहा छैन अनि गुरू पद्म सम्भव बुद्धिस्ट होईन 2 ट बिहे गरेको यताउता हिँडडुल गरी हिंड्ने ब्यक्ति हाे बन्ने सदगुरु र शंकर चर्या same same हो प्रिय मित्र हो।
waha Padma Shamser Junga Bahadur Rana ka Panati Hunu hunxa ra waha Hindu kul ma janmera syanai dekhi Dharma intrest vayeko ra waha ley 9 Barsha samma Hindu Tantra ko Avyash garera paxi Khaptad Baba sanga Vedanta ko Gahan adhyan ra Aavyash garera swayam Kaptad Baba ley nai 'Aatma gyan" payeko ra Vedanta sikhauna anumati paunu vayeko ho .waha ley tetikai bolnu vayeko hoina waha ley adhyan ra avyash derai gahan roopma gareko hunaley waha ley vitri kura sabai vannu vayeko ho.
🇳🇵🙏 महायोगीको नजरमा धर्म भनेको मानवता हुनूपर्छ । महायोगी भनेको बुद्धत्व प्राप्तीको अवस्था हो र बुद्धको धम्म सम्पुर्ण प्राणीहरूको कल्याणमा समर्पित हुनूपर्छ । महायोगीको ऋदयमा महा करूणा हुनूपर्छ । ❤️🙏🕊🔔🇳🇵🌏🙏🧎♂️🙇
![RATNASHREE | EP [70] | के बुद्धधर्म हिन्दुधर्मकाे हाँगा हाे ?](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1FsrZhyVFVs/mqdefault.jpg)
![RATNASHREE | EP [70] | के बुद्धधर्म हिन्दुधर्मकाे हाँगा हाे ?](/img/tr.png)
![RATNASHREE | EP [71] | के ओशो मैत्रीय बुद्ध हो ?](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ApUPFbdlZok/mqdefault.jpg)
ॐ मानी पेमें हुँ 🙏🙏🙏 बुद्ध प्रबचन हाम्राे नेपाली समप्रदायमाँ बुझाउँनु धेरै अाबस्यक छ हजुर गुरु ।
Dear Rana sir congratulation for this truth history information, your are the teacher, In crucial thing unity, In important thing dignity,In all thing generosity.
With my deep respect:
Mr Kishor Kumar Sunuwar
UK
हार्दिक साधुवाद !जानकारीको लागि श्रीधर राणा रिन्पोछे ज्यू ।
ल्हासो फ्याफुल्जि खेन्बो गुरुरेन्पोर्छे टासीदेले गुरु वर बाट हामी बुधिष्ट हरुलाई थप ज्ञान प्रधान गरि दीनु भएकोमा धेरै धेरै धन्यबाद !!
Boddhi Tv should have English Translation for these teachings so that it can benefit more of Non Nepalese audience as well.
The English version is already started
@@bistamukunda Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu
ककस्ले किन र कसरी बौद्धधर्मलाई मासे यसबारे गहन अध्यन अनुसंधान होस ।
Please share your knowledge in hindi or English. Love and respect from India maharashtra .
Now slowly these videos are being translated into English. There are already 10 videos in English.
भगवान बुद्ध ले पैदल हिने रै आधा विश्व बुद्ध मय बनायो, उढने भगवान भारत मै रहयो!
𑀲𑀩𑁆 𑀩𑁂 𑀩𑀼𑀤𑁆𑀥𑀲𑁆𑀲 𑀩𑀺𑀫𑁆 𑀩𑁂 𑀲𑀓𑀮𑀤𑀲𑀤𑀺𑀲𑁂 𑀓𑁂𑀲𑀮𑁄 𑀫𑀸 𑀤𑀺 𑀥𑀸𑀢𑀼𑀁 𑀯𑀁 𑀤𑁂
𑀲𑀩𑁆 𑀩𑁂𑀧𑀺 𑀩𑀼𑀤𑀥𑀁 𑀤𑀲𑀩𑀮𑀢𑀦𑀼𑀚𑀁 𑀩𑁄𑀥𑀺𑀘𑁂𑀢𑁆𑀢𑀺𑀬𑀁 𑀦𑀫𑀸𑀫𑀺
𑀯𑀁𑀤𑀸𑀫𑀺. 𑀘𑁂𑀢𑀺𑀬𑀁 𑀲𑀩𑁆𑀩𑀁 𑀲𑀩𑁆𑀩𑀝𑁆𑀞𑀸𑀦𑁂𑀲𑀼 𑀧𑀢𑀺𑀝𑁆𑀞𑀺𑀢𑀁
𑀲𑀸𑀭𑀻 𑀭𑀺𑀓 𑀥𑀸𑀢𑀼 𑀫𑀳𑀸𑀩𑁄𑀥𑀺 𑀩𑀼𑀤𑁆𑀥𑀭𑀼 𑀧𑀁 𑀲𑀓𑀮𑀁 𑀲𑀤𑀸 🙏🙏🙏
To all the images of Buddha, in all ten directions,
to even hairs and other relics, I give honour.
To the Ten Powers of the Buddha,
to the Cairn of Bodhi, I give honour.
Greetings every stupa, that may stand in any place,
The relics, the Great Bodhi, and Buddha forms everywhere!🙏🙏🙏
त्यस बेला बौद्ध धर्मको प्रख्यातिले बौखलायका हिन्दुहरु जसरी भयपनी बौद्ध धर्म सिध्याउने मनस्थितिमा रहेको बेला आदि शंकराचार्यले बौद्ध विद्वानहरुलाइ शास्त्रार्थ गरि जितेको भए शास्त्रार्थ गरेको विषय त्यसमा गरेका प्रश्न त्यस्को उतर सहितको ठुलो ग्रन्थ लेख्थ्यो होला किनकि त्यस बेला सम्म भारतबर्ष मा राजाहरु अधिकान्स हिन्दु थिए । त्यो त गरेन। त्यसको अर्थ शास्त्रार्थ गरेकै छैन । गरेको भए मिलिन्द्र प्रश्न जस्तै ग्रन्थ हुनु पर्ने हो त्यसबेलाको प्रचलन अनुसार । गुरुले भन्नु भए जस्तै सेना लगायर बुद्ध धर्म मासेको हो। गुरुले अस्पस्त कुरालाइ स्पष्ट गरि व्याख्या गरिदिनु भयो ।साधु साधु!साधु
Thanks Rinpoche Rana Ratnashree for explaining this historical fact about Adi Shankaracharya and his role in suppressing the buddhist religion in India by the use of violent means.
Buddhism faced a great setback in second century BCE following the atrocities committed by Pushyamitra Sung (who had established the brahmin Sung dynasty) against buddhists. However, it somehow managed to survive and even flourished in the succeeding periods thanks to the support extended to buddhist monks and viharas by kings like Kaniska, Harsabardhan of Kannauj and Pal kings of Bengal. There were great centres of buddhist learning such as Nalanda Maha vihar. The famous Chinese Buddhist Scholar Xuanzang studied at Nalanda for several years under Venerable Silabhadra in the 7th century CE. There was a strong tradition of religious discourses and debates at that time. King Harsabardhan had organized a great assembly of scholars participated in by Hindu, Jain and Buddhist scholars in which the visiting scholar Xuanzang was also invited to participate.
Given the prevailing intellectual environment at that time it is highly improbable that any philosophical debate in 8th century CE between Shankaracharya and Buddihist scholars would have passed unnoticed. Infact historical records show that Shakaracharya had debated with Hindu philosophers of different schools the most notable being his debate with Mandana Mishra of Mithila who was a disciple of Kumarila Bhatta (purba mimamsa school). After losing in debate Mandana Mishra acknowledged the superiority of Shankara's vedanta doctrine and became his disciple.
Yes absolutely
ua-cam.com/video/omM3vnHsVik/v-deo.html
@@thirdeye7136 What Puri Sankharacarya is saying is wrong. Pracchanna-Bauddha was the title given by the proponent of Dvaita-Vedanta, Bhaskaracarya. And, Puri Shankaracarya didn't understand the meaning of Sunyata, just like Adi Sankharacarya. Further, when Vyaakarana and Nirukti are different, the meaning of the word is also different. Panini says that there are two types of Sanskrit: Chandaso and Laukiki. Buddgist use Laukiki, hence their interpretations of the word/concepts are different. Anyway, these people are so dishonest, they don't even speak the truth. Hypocrites!
@@bibeksharma270 when buddhists became communist then you will understand very nicely . You even don't know whome you are telling buddha . So important is to find yourself . Be the candel yourself .
@@thirdeye7136 I know the Buddha and his teachings well, because not only I am a scholar of Buddhism, but I also practice Buddhism under an authentic Buddhist guru of a proper lineage. I read these texts in Sanakrit, Chinese and Pali itself. Therefore, you and such hypocrite Hindu gurus as the one who have no idea at all what the Buddha taught. 😀
🙏🙏🙏🙏 pyapula guru hjrko satya tathya aaja hamro lagi derai motivation baneko x guru hjr🙏🙏🙏🙏
tasidhele guru!!!!!hajur ko prabachan sunda sarai man ananda hunxxc🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹
महिम संप्रदायबारे बहस र अनुसंधान होस ।
Ratna shree ma shada dand bat pranam 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💐💐💐💐💐🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺
हिन्दु गुरुलाई चाहिँ 3 पट्कसम्म आचार्य धर्मकिर्तिले हराउनुभएको हो।
दर्शन गुरु।
गुरुभ्य: नमाे 🙏🙏🙏
साधु साधु साधु ।
Thank you so much 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻💐💐💐🌻🌻🌻
गुरुलाई नमन, साधुवाद
Love this
Tashi delek Guru ji.. 🙏🙏🙏
नमो गुरुभ्ये 🙏🙏🙏🌷
Sadhu sadhu sadhu guru charan ma !!!
बुदम शरणम गच्छामी,🙏🙏🙏
Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu:)
Xya jyaĺo 🙏 guru dev.
धन्यवाद गुरु !
Namo buddhaya namo dharmaya namo sangaya tasi dhelek khembola
Jai Gurudeve om buddha
Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu
Trs 🙏🙏🙏🌻🌻🌻🙏🙏🙏🌹🌹🌹🙏🙏🙏💐💐💐🙏🙏🙏🌺🌺🌺🙏🙏🙏
Great
लास्सो फ्याफुल्ला गुरु खेन्पो ल।🌷🌻🌷🌻🌷🌻
Remporchhe rana jyu✋🌷🌺
🙏🙏🙏
guru naman
Renpochhe La kyapsuxe Fyafulla
Namo Guru 🌻🙏🌻🙏🌻🙏🌻
🙏🙏🙏🌷
रिम्पोचेज्यूमा प्रणाम । भिडियो शेयर गर्ने इजाजत माग्दछु ।
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🌷🌷🌷
कट्टर हिन्दुहरु पहिलेदेखिनै फटाहा रहेछन ।
ua-cam.com/video/omM3vnHsVik/v-deo.html
@@thirdeye7136 यो भिडियो जंहा पनि राख्दै हिंडन पर्ने?
@@aryankarki7900 ताकि सत्य के हो सबैले बुझुन ।
@@thirdeye7136 That proves nothing.Even many Hindu Gurus and Pundits have given wrong information on Buddha dhamma and Shakyamuni time after time.
Calling Shakyamuni as Hindu god's avatar is false claim and narrative by the Hindu Gurus from the get go.Do not even start this debate,you are going to lose in every angles
@@aryankarki7900 रिन्पोचे ले जे भन्यो त्यहि सहि हो ?
🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺🌺 रिनपोर्छे ला क्यापसोछी
🙏🙏🙏🌸🌼🌸🙏🙏🙏
सुभम्ङ्गल तासिधेलिग गुरु जि म एउटा प्रस्न गर्न चाहान्छु गुरु जि एस्को जोबाब दिनु होला गुरु जि प्रस्न यो छ पैला कुन धर्म आएको थियोे र हिन्दु या बुद्ध पिलिज यस्को जोबाब दिए मा आभारी हुने थे गुरु
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Saduh saduh saduh
🌺🌷🌺🙏🙏🙏🌺🌷🌺
ok.
REMPORCHHE LASSO NAMSKAR ✋✋✋🌺😍
S.N Goenka ko Vipassana dhyan ko barema bhanidinus na...
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙇🌷🌻🌺🌹
Sadhu sadhu sadhu
🙏🙏🙏🌺🌺💐📿
ॐ * हो ** नी गुरु ! अब: मान्छे मर्दै न !! मार्दै हिंड्ने लाई के भन्ने ? तसर्थ : बौद्ध मार्ग मा बज्राचार्य चाहियो लह्हसो टासिंदेला गुर #
tashi delegla rinporchhela
Lhasso rempochhe la. Hamile uhalai K marfat question garna sakinxa Hola?
bk-nepal@byomakusuma.org Ma Prashna Pathaunu Hosh
2020 Nepal
शंकर चर्या भनेको अहिले तपाईं हामी अगाडि बोल्नु हुने राणा रिम्पोचे काे तुलनामा भन्नु पर्दा राणा रिम्पोचेको 4भागमा एक भाग पनि ज्ञान र सिद्धा छैन शंकर चर्या मा।मैले हिन्दु पुराण शास्त्र अध्ययन गर्दा शंकर चर्या काे चरित्र अलिक दानवीय प्रवितिको देखे भने गुरू गोरखनाथ एक सामान रूपी करुणा भएको सिद्ध ब्यक्ति को रूपमा बुझे। भन्नु पर्दा हिन्दु हरू ले जो जलन्दर राछस् भन्दा पनि नीच पाप कर्म गर्न पछि नपर्ने ब्यक्ति शंकर चर्या थियो । अब आफैं बुझ्नु त्यस्ता फ्याउरो चोरी डकैती गर्ने पाप कर्म गर्न पछि नपर्ने ब्यक्ति संकर्चर्य बौद्ध धर्म सँग तुलना गर्ने ब्यक्ति मानसिक असतुलान ब्यक्ति हुनु पर्छ कि अज्ञान ब्यक्ति हरु काे भनाइ हुनु पर्छ जो लाई केही थाहा नभएको अरुको भ्रम कुराको पछि विस्वास गरेको ब्यक्ति हुनु पर्छ। तसर्थ शंकर चर्या भनेको अहिलेका इन्डियाका सद गुरू भन्ने एक पशु ब्यक्ति छ जसलाई बुद्ध धर्म सम्बन्धि केही थाहा छैन अनि गुरू पद्म सम्भव बुद्धिस्ट होईन 2 ट बिहे गरेको यताउता हिँडडुल गरी हिंड्ने ब्यक्ति हाे बन्ने सदगुरु र शंकर चर्या same same हो प्रिय मित्र हो।
Shadhu Shadhu Shadhu
बौद्धधर्म कसरी ईण्डिया नेपालबाट लोप भयो यससंबन्धमा ब्यापक बहस गरी केहि सिकौ।
Ahile pani dharma baki nai cha. Baru tehi sikera abhyaas garaun na? :)
Ko?
Do u think he has guts to speak against Adi guru Shankaracharya?
Without speaking against Shankara no-one has been established nowadays .
@@ManojBhandari yes
गफ सुन्दा रिन्पोछे नै पो सर्वज्ञात भए जस्तो छ त दोष सबै हिन्दूहरूलाई दिने आफू चाही सबै चोखो जस्तो कुरा छ ।
waha Padma Shamser Junga Bahadur Rana ka Panati Hunu hunxa ra waha Hindu kul ma janmera syanai dekhi Dharma intrest vayeko ra waha ley 9 Barsha samma Hindu Tantra ko Avyash garera paxi Khaptad Baba sanga Vedanta ko Gahan adhyan ra Aavyash garera swayam Kaptad Baba ley nai 'Aatma gyan" payeko ra Vedanta sikhauna anumati paunu vayeko ho .waha ley tetikai bolnu vayeko hoina waha ley adhyan ra avyash derai gahan roopma gareko hunaley waha ley vitri kura sabai vannu vayeko ho.
yasari galat kura garnu hunna sadhule.
@wrong notes ua-cam.com/video/omM3vnHsVik/v-deo.html
@@thirdeye7136 Third eye. or no eyes.That proves nothing
🇳🇵🙏
महायोगीको नजरमा धर्म भनेको मानवता हुनूपर्छ । महायोगी भनेको बुद्धत्व प्राप्तीको अवस्था हो र बुद्धको धम्म सम्पुर्ण प्राणीहरूको कल्याणमा समर्पित हुनूपर्छ । महायोगीको ऋदयमा महा करूणा हुनूपर्छ ।
❤️🙏🕊🔔🇳🇵🌏🙏🧎♂️🙇
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💐
Sadhu sadhu sadhu
2020 Nepal
Sadhu sadhu sadhu