Come on!!!! They always credit Karl for this!!! He is not a good designer!!! Please give credit to Gilles Dufour and Victoire de Castellane!!!!!! They gave this collection its pizzazz, color anx accessories.
@@Boo20008 yes. Victoire isn't a clothing designer but she designed accessories and she was made into an honorary muse. That is why she is the accessory designer of Dior now. And you know what? Her designs can stand on its own. Excuse me, Gilles Dufour designed clothes. Let me ask you, what is Amanda Harlech's job at Chanel and Fendi??? She is not a clothing designer either.
@@Boo20008 Karl became the creative director of Fendi more than Chanel. In the 80s up to around 1997, his right hand man was Gilles Dufour. Karl knows how to design lots of things but he doesn't know how to style them. That was his biggest problem that's why his namesake brand suffered. Gilles Dufour was the one making sure that it was current for the clients. Victoire de Castellane, niece of Gilles, was brought into the house in the early 90s, that's why Chanel started to have a young feeling but by mid 90s, minimalism came in and the Chanel sales were dwindling. When Amanda Harlech was not hired by LVMH, Amanda was pirated by the house of Chanel and started helping the house as a "muse" by 1997. Did it help? Not quite cause in the late 90s, the hip designers were either Americans or the Brits. Amanda I would say help bring Chanel to go back to its roots. By that time, the influence of Gilles Dufour and Victoire was waning so Gilles gave chanel the middle finger and moved to Balmain while Victoire was given the accessory designer role for the house of Dior. This angered Karl. Like anyone else who did their thing. Kinda sounds like that he is not just a control freak but a dictator. Lastly, despite having Amanda on board, it wasn't enough to get the house to sell plenty so by year 2000, Karl, invited Virginie Viard to the house. They used to work together at the house of Chloe. That's the reason why Viard's design resemble Lagerfeld's except hers is less costume-y and slightly boring. Plus another thing is Lagerfeld was lucky to have worked with Sylvia Venturini at Fendi cause she invented that Fendi baguette and if not for her, the Chanel 2.55 won't have any other looks apart from the boring quilted leather. The chanel 2.55 started to be produced in different fabrics, colors and design just like the fendi baguette. It started with the ff logo and then it became made of denim, embroidered, sequined, made of ponyskin, etc etc. Your just saying he is a great designer because he designed for the house of Chanel and Chanel is now a big mega brand. Baloney!! History will tell you that if not for those people behind his persona, both the Chanel and Fendi brands won't get the status it has globally. Tbh, I find it tacky. Now, these brands are just brands. It may be expensive, but who cares. It is not part of mainstream culture anymore so it sucks.
Early 90s fashion shows look like they were so much to work in and attend.
The models had such individual personality, there was an air of theatricality to it all. Not like the boring shows of today,
brandi has that real crackhead energy
Ooooooh Brandi got in Moss's way. I bet that went down well with Mardy Ms Moss!
4.3 yasmeen ghauri stunning?!!!
Yeah, I was looking for her. I saw all the top models and saying, where is Yasmeen?
Brandi LOL
Come on!!!! They always credit Karl for this!!! He is not a good designer!!! Please give credit to Gilles Dufour and Victoire de Castellane!!!!!! They gave this collection its pizzazz, color anx accessories.
not clothing designers
@@Boo20008 yes. Victoire isn't a clothing designer but she designed accessories and she was made into an honorary muse. That is why she is the accessory designer of Dior now. And you know what? Her designs can stand on its own. Excuse me, Gilles Dufour designed clothes. Let me ask you, what is Amanda Harlech's job at Chanel and Fendi??? She is not a clothing designer either.
@@mayac.1345 I think Karl is like a creative director.I love his idea of street mix style.1987 〜 1996 is so cool. How do you think?
@@Boo20008 Karl became the creative director of Fendi more than Chanel. In the 80s up to around 1997, his right hand man was Gilles Dufour. Karl knows how to design lots of things but he doesn't know how to style them. That was his biggest problem that's why his namesake brand suffered. Gilles Dufour was the one making sure that it was current for the clients. Victoire de Castellane, niece of Gilles, was brought into the house in the early 90s, that's why Chanel started to have a young feeling but by mid 90s, minimalism came in and the Chanel sales were dwindling. When Amanda Harlech was not hired by LVMH, Amanda was pirated by the house of Chanel and started helping the house as a "muse" by 1997. Did it help? Not quite cause in the late 90s, the hip designers were either Americans or the Brits. Amanda I would say help bring Chanel to go back to its roots. By that time, the influence of Gilles Dufour and Victoire was waning so Gilles gave chanel the middle finger and moved to Balmain while Victoire was given the accessory designer role for the house of Dior. This angered Karl. Like anyone else who did their thing. Kinda sounds like that he is not just a control freak but a dictator. Lastly, despite having Amanda on board, it wasn't enough to get the house to sell plenty so by year 2000, Karl, invited Virginie Viard to the house. They used to work together at the house of Chloe. That's the reason why Viard's design resemble Lagerfeld's except hers is less costume-y and slightly boring. Plus another thing is Lagerfeld was lucky to have worked with Sylvia Venturini at Fendi cause she invented that Fendi baguette and if not for her, the Chanel 2.55 won't have any other looks apart from the boring quilted leather. The chanel 2.55 started to be produced in different fabrics, colors and design just like the fendi baguette. It started with the ff logo and then it became made of denim, embroidered, sequined, made of ponyskin, etc etc. Your just saying he is a great designer because he designed for the house of Chanel and Chanel is now a big mega brand. Baloney!! History will tell you that if not for those people behind his persona, both the Chanel and Fendi brands won't get the status it has globally. Tbh, I find it tacky. Now, these brands are just brands. It may be expensive, but who cares. It is not part of mainstream culture anymore so it sucks.
@@mayac.1345 wow. Thank you so long response.I didn't know back ground.
So How do you think about Kim Jones?