Correcting a Leak and Preventing New Ones: Why We Are Dryocking the Battleship

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 159

  • @DeviantOllam
    @DeviantOllam Рік тому +24

    Wow, you know what I just realized? Often when you are filming on the battleship you are situated in some seriously boomy/echo-y spaces, but your audio always comes through very clear. However you folk are washing that through a post-processing filter is really working... all the little hidden labor that goes into production takes time but is deeply appreciated. Thanks for the great work and offering all of us so much terrific educational content. 😁👍

    • @BattleshipNewJersey
      @BattleshipNewJersey  Рік тому +13

      Thanks! We get a lot of heat for our audio not being perfect and it ain't easy to get it this far.

    • @DeviantOllam
      @DeviantOllam Рік тому +5

      @@BattleshipNewJersey those are goofuses who hate ya 'cause they ain't ya... keep doing what you're doing 😁👍 you're great

    • @NLAWScametovisit
      @NLAWScametovisit Рік тому +1

      @@DeviantOllam video on red teaming the battleship New Jersey when?

  • @brianwilson3458
    @brianwilson3458 Рік тому +12

    Good to see the curator metric system is still in use.

  • @Odin029
    @Odin029 Рік тому +19

    The idea of having 45000+ tons of battleship sit itself down on top of you terrifying.

    • @shanieboi86
      @shanieboi86 Рік тому +2

      The irony of this comment is that you would have over 45000 tons of water above you at that depth if there was no ship there or the ship wouldnt float.

    • @rootbeerpoptart
      @rootbeerpoptart Рік тому +7

      ​@@shanieboi86it's a bit easier to swim through water than a battleship though

  • @jasonmurawski5877
    @jasonmurawski5877 Рік тому +33

    1. Clean and paint the ship
    2. Replace the anodes
    3. Inspect openings
    4. Repack gland seals

    • @turkeyboyjh1
      @turkeyboyjh1 Рік тому +5

      I like how you placed the thing that could sink the ship first last, yes corrosion is a vastly important part of vessel preservation but on a ship of this scale things like shaft glands and huge and can leak massive quantities of water into the ship before corrosion can even start to be an issue on an armored ship, through hole openings are the next important because some of the openings like the one shown in the video are also capable off leaking massive amounts of water into the ship and are much thinner than the material around

    • @Grunttamer
      @Grunttamer Рік тому +1

      @@turkeyboyjh1probably wouldn’t do the list in series anyway

    • @jasonmurawski5877
      @jasonmurawski5877 Рік тому

      @@turkeyboyjh1 the gland seals can be repacked while in the water. They’re specifically designed to be able to do that. It’s easier to do it out of the water, but if they run out of time to do it, it can be done at her berth. The other stuff HAS to be done in drydock.

    • @paulheitkemper1559
      @paulheitkemper1559 Рік тому

      ​@@turkeyboyjh1gland seals aren't as much of a problem on a shaft that's never expected to turn again.

    • @adamk203
      @adamk203 Рік тому

      @@turkeyboyjh1 the shaft tunnels are relatively small compartments, so if a gland seal failed, it would only flood a very small part of the ship. Not ideal, but it definitely would not sink it.

  • @mattorama
    @mattorama Рік тому +11

    So cool to see such an important ship preserved. I've lived in New Jersey my entire life and my uncle's unit called in fire missions from the New Jersey in Vietnam.

  • @williamparrish673
    @williamparrish673 Рік тому +10

    It amazes me how similar a ship is to a power plant. I understand now why it was called a stationary unit. Run it may shine it must .

  • @highstreetkillers4377
    @highstreetkillers4377 Рік тому +2

    @Battleship New Jersey, Ryan you need someone to donate or fundraise for an underwater drone. Not a million dollar one, but I'm sure you could find a really good one for few thousand. It'd make it possible for you to easily and safely inspect the ship underneath. Not needed now if you're going to Drydock. But moving forward for future inspections it'd be a good idea. Also cheaper than paying a diver in the long run and safer

  • @francisginese3500
    @francisginese3500 7 місяців тому

    Hi Ron I watched your video about the main condensers. When I served on board the USS Randolph I worked in the NO2 Engine Room and I had to go in the main condensers to inspect them and The smell was horrible which was methane gas back in the 1962 there were no safety rules. In you video you wondered what kind of metal they were made of the answer is MONEL all of the metal in contact with salt water is made out of this metal. MONEL IS MADE OUT OF A NICKEL-COPPER ALLOYS ABOUT 66% NICKEL AND 31.5% COPOPER WITH SMALL AMOUNTS OF iRON.
    Thanks again for the personal guided tour you gave to my son and I on fathers day several years ago. Keep up the good work your doing a great job
    Yours truly Anthony Carta and Son

  • @janjones4536
    @janjones4536 Рік тому +6

    hi ryan--jan from crew of the COD here--( yep, im a girl ) My dad was pacific ww2 engine room crew chief on USS KNOX apa 46--island hopping--Im going to Pearl in three weeks in dads memory and will be where he was 80 years ago. Im looking so forward to seeing Mighty Mo, as i havent been in a battleship before. Looks like all will go well for your big gal. Great video ( as was the one with Paul ) Thanks so much for sharing!!! Good luck and keep those videos coming!

  • @jmacd8817
    @jmacd8817 Рік тому +36

    Question: how are museum ships that have been dry docked after mothballing doing? Are their repairs, etc holding up better than the work done during decommissioning?

    • @turkeyboyjh1
      @turkeyboyjh1 Рік тому +2

      I would assume so as long as they hired competent welders, welding technology has came a long way even in the last 10 years

    • @tomhenry897
      @tomhenry897 Рік тому

      St.Louis let theirs sink
      Another town in NY? Let theirs sink but in shallow water

  • @jmacd8817
    @jmacd8817 Рік тому +18

    The blanks are more important, IMHO, simply because they are inaccessible when in the water, and may have leaks hidden by valves.
    The prop shafts are accessible, and can be repacked while submerged.

    • @turkeyboyjh1
      @turkeyboyjh1 Рік тому +3

      Both are equally important I wonder if there is a way they could pressurize the compartments containing the gland seals to check for leaks and/or keep water intrusion out in the future, I know the sealed doors are capable of taking quite immense amounts of pressure

    • @BillSteinhauser
      @BillSteinhauser 11 місяців тому

      Using air pressure to check seals can work in certain situations... but you have to be careful where used and how much pressure is applied.
      If you add too much pressure behind some of these seals (even just to check) the air pressure itself could push OUT through the seal, causing a leak allowing water to flow back in afterward.

  • @randymagnum143
    @randymagnum143 Рік тому

    The inspection itself will be the most important thing, and the knowledge it will bring of potential future issues.

  • @insanereindeer4081
    @insanereindeer4081 Рік тому +1

    It amazing how a handful of you guys maintain this thing.
    As for fixing leaks, they are all important for an easy next few years.

  • @SnowmanTF2
    @SnowmanTF2 Рік тому +5

    Given how shallow the space below the ship sounds and I think you have mentioned before silting has been happening while the ship has been at the current site, are their plans to do dredging while the ship is away?

  • @wookychewbacca5184
    @wookychewbacca5184 Рік тому +2

    As you have stated repairing any leaking blanks, some as you said won't reveal themselves until sitting in dry dock, repacking the shaft and rudder seals, and recoating the hull both under and at the water line, as well as changing the zincs to aluminum. I don't know what else could be or cause any more leaks as you have covered most of them including the thinner skin on the bow. I guess the key with a dry dock trip being so expensive would be to cover anything that could possibly fail underwater before it fails. Keep up the good work that you and your crew are doing in preserving one of the last battle wagons that will ever be built

  • @DavidSmith-cx8dg
    @DavidSmith-cx8dg Рік тому +1

    If you are thinking of the future , any item that may be ok now and doesn't get done will be a priority for your successor so it's going to be important the condition of the underwater hull is recorded as fully as possible . Underwater openings , especially on the flat bottom given the diving hazard and the coatings would be essential , if anything has to be cut it has to be jobs that could be done in the water . Full marks for the thought and planning being done and I hope you get the full funding in time .

  • @PhilGoldblum
    @PhilGoldblum Рік тому +1

    1) inspect / repair thru-hull openings
    2) Blast/Paint
    3) New Anodes (and maybe some extra on the large thru-hulls)
    4) Repack glands
    Thanks for the Videos Ryan

  • @Therealtracyduane
    @Therealtracyduane Рік тому +5

    The exhaust steam (Dead Steam) from the turbine is condensed into condensate which is aerated water. The condensate is pumped via Condensate Pumps (CP), to the Deaerating Feed Tank (DFT). Above the DFT is the deaerator, which removes dissolved oxygen from the condensate turning it into feedwater. The DFT is set high in the space to provide about 20 to 30 psi of suction head pressure to the Feed Pump Booster Pumps (FPBP), which discharge approximately 80 psi suction head pressure to the Boiler Feedwater Pumps (BFP), which discharge to the boilers at from 750 to 1,350 psi depending on the boiler operating pressure. The reason for the progression of of feedwater pumps is to prevent cavitation, the flashing of water to steam at low pressures, which would destroy the internals of the BFP.

    • @henrycarlson7514
      @henrycarlson7514 Рік тому +1

      The Maim feed pumps on Ranger and Hepburn , were 1500 psi.

    • @Therealtracyduane
      @Therealtracyduane Рік тому

      Excellent, Thanks for the info

    • @BillSteinhauser
      @BillSteinhauser 11 місяців тому

      Nice description @theRealTracyDuane
      Glad to know more about how that works.
      Sounds like you have spent time with that equipment, to keep it running + healthy.
      A few thoughts/questions:
      1) If the steam/condense/water cycle is a closed loop, then how does air/oxygen get into that water cycle to need deairation?
      2) When steam goes through condenser, do you recall the temp of water coming out of condener, through BFP and back into boiler??
      It would seem like a temp near 180F would condense steam to water (though still fairly hot) but require less fuel/energy for the boilers to heat water back to steam.
      ... or does the water need to be cooler than 150F to work in DFT properly?
      3) I would like to understand more about the 1300+PSI Boiler Feed Pumps...
      Were the BFP electrical powered... steam powered... or some of each for redundancy and use at different times?
      About how many gallons per minute of condensed feed water had to be pumped back into those boilers?
      It would need to be a lot to keep BB62 turbines turning at 50,000hp each.
      We're the pumps themselves single stage centrifugal pumps... multi stage... or what kind of design to get that much water back into boilers running well over 1000PSI.

  • @robertf3479
    @robertf3479 Рік тому +2

    My recommended priorities for the docking plan is to test and replace the blanks as needed before 'blasting and painting the underwater hull followed by the 'blasting and paint. Then repack or seal the rudder posts and shaft openings.

  • @dwayne7356
    @dwayne7356 Рік тому +1

    Would like to see a video on the team planning this drydock.
    Is the navy helping? Did you hire a consultant? Did you hire a project manager to handle the yard, Coast Guard, Navy, tug boats, cranes, museum staff and berth projects while the ship is moved?

    • @BattleshipNewJersey
      @BattleshipNewJersey  Рік тому +3

      The navy is not involved. You'll see that team on this channel as we get closer to move day for sure!

  • @mikos321
    @mikos321 Рік тому +5

    You really should take the chance to 3D scan the ship while in drydock, if time and gov allows ofc!

  • @kennethwise7108
    @kennethwise7108 Рік тому

    Great job for Belzona

  • @kennethwise7108
    @kennethwise7108 Рік тому

    To this day the coolest thing I've ever seen in regards to sandblasting is how they are able to effectively sandblast the side of a Long Black submersible ship via a robotic device that leaves no mess.

  • @ZigZagMarquis
    @ZigZagMarquis Рік тому +4

    Ryan, a question, when New Jersey goes into dry dock, I'm assuming that at some point, once she's up on blocks and the dry dock drained, you and your associates will be allowed onto the floor of the dry dock. My question is, do you have a list of things to go see first or walk around and just take it all in?

    • @BattleshipNewJersey
      @BattleshipNewJersey  Рік тому +4

      We won't be running to the weak end of the bow or anything but we've got a list of concern spots we will look extra close at. But first, probably just a nice stroll around the whole thing

  • @Dumbrarere
    @Dumbrarere Рік тому +1

    General hull maintenance and leakproofing are a must, but I say leave the plugs alone until last. You should also consider raising funds for other drydock projects like restoring the pumps and/or replacing the broken valves.

    • @aserta
      @aserta Рік тому +1

      Unlikely she'll get another chance at a drydock any time soon. Unfortunately, education is not that high on the list of politicians, and they're very not interested in helping veterans unless it suits their needs.

  • @andrewcubbage1007
    @andrewcubbage1007 Рік тому

    Suggested priorities are
    1. Repack the gland seals as they can let in a lot of water very quickly if they fail
    2. Replace the anodes as without them the ship will start to corrode badly
    3. Inspect the openings and re-weld where necessary
    4. Paint the ship

  • @poowg2657
    @poowg2657 Рік тому +3

    You need to install stainless steel DeZURICK valves. No corrosion issues. One of the few high quality items our papermill buys. Cool video.

    • @vinny142
      @vinny142 Рік тому +3

      Stainless steel still corrodes, especially in salt water. Metallurgy is a very complex field.

    • @tomhenry897
      @tomhenry897 Рік тому

      Unless cheaply made

    • @jasonmurawski5877
      @jasonmurawski5877 Рік тому

      They aren’t allowed to power up any engineering equipment, so they probably aren’t allowed to replace stuff on it either

    • @jimmiles33
      @jimmiles33 Рік тому

      @@jasonmurawski5877why are Cod and Silversides able to run their engines then?

    • @jasonmurawski5877
      @jasonmurawski5877 Рік тому +1

      @@jimmiles33 that’s there specific navy contract. I cant say for certain on either of those ships but none of the iowas are allowed to run their engines, boilers, or diesels.

  • @npsit1
    @npsit1 Рік тому +1

    I'm curious how long it would take to make a ship like this sea-worthy. Not necessarily battle ready, but able to function on its own at sea. Seems like a lot of work went into mothballing it so much would probably have to be undone. And does dry docking allow to inspect/fix issues that might be problematic later therefore allowing a shorter return-to-service time? Not that I see that being a possibility at the moment.

  • @dirtdevil70
    @dirtdevil70 Рік тому

    Apart from pressure testing the blanks is there any other way to test the thickness or integrity of the patches? Perhaps X-ray for thickness or magnaflux for weld integrity ?

  • @achdumeineguete
    @achdumeineguete Рік тому

    Keep on floating! 🤘
    I really would like to pay a visit to BB62 one day.

  • @Andy85H
    @Andy85H Рік тому +1

    I’d say general hull maintenance then repack the screws followed lastly by through hull plugs.

  • @casperamodio4408
    @casperamodio4408 Рік тому

    While the ship is in dry dock, will you be leaving some of the underwater holes open? To maybe reactivate some equipment or certain systems you’d like to see work again?

    • @BattleshipNewJersey
      @BattleshipNewJersey  Рік тому +2

      Absolutely not. We can't reactivate the systems that run steam and we can plumb in our own water for everything else.

  • @jamesturner2126
    @jamesturner2126 Рік тому

    Big J takes in a bunch of water, because she is steam powered. However, turbine powered warships are also steam powered. The General Electric LM-2500 marine gas turbine is water injected, therefore it uses steam to drive its power turbine, just like Battleship New Jersey drives her turbines with steam. So the technologies on your fabulous museum are very relevant today.

  • @darylmorning
    @darylmorning Рік тому

    I'm not a metallurgical expert so is it possible to add additional sacrificial anodes that could be replaced by divers to prevent as much of the corrosion as possible.

  • @sparkplug1018
    @sparkplug1018 Рік тому

    I'd rate painting the hull and verifying/replacing the blanks at number one.
    Then the anodes and gland seals.

  • @consideruk
    @consideruk Рік тому

    When you are dry docking the ship is their some parts of the ship you could get working again? By opening some of the panels that were close during the moth balling process that could be beneficial?

    • @BattleshipNewJersey
      @BattleshipNewJersey  Рік тому +3

      We would not want to do that even if we were allowed. We don't want to more holes in the ship, thats where the water comes in! We aren't allowed to activate the engines.

  • @hulkhoganstights6596
    @hulkhoganstights6596 Рік тому +1

    Bring them back to restore peace!

  • @saltydawg1793
    @saltydawg1793 Рік тому

    Priority order in descending order: Blanks, paint hull, stern tubes with emphasis on prop shafts.

  • @suigintouivanhoe1167
    @suigintouivanhoe1167 Рік тому

    Are you planning to check and fix the valves too?

  • @robertbamford8266
    @robertbamford8266 Рік тому

    Well, assuming the blanks are treated as part of the hull, blanks before painting, after cleaning.

  • @mik3ymomo
    @mik3ymomo Рік тому +77

    Gotta get it ready to deploy to the Mediterranean!

    • @joejoemyo
      @joejoemyo Рік тому

      Certainly a lot of -apartment blocks- terrorist strongholds to bombard

    • @robertf3479
      @robertf3479 Рік тому +5

      I was joking around on a comment board earlier today when I suggested that parking a battleship just off Gaza could do a couple of things for both Israel and our Navy. One thing she could do would be to act as a distraction to the Islamists, keeping their attention focused on her if she started training and elevating her main battery and their attention not so much on Special Forces or the regular army if they are able to move quietly. "Robert's Rule of Combat #23 - Use your opponent's paranoia against him."

    • @MyklEnigma
      @MyklEnigma Рік тому +2

      Imagine parking New Jersey off off the coast in the Mediterranean with either the Ford or the Eisenhower strike groups...yeah baby ! 👍🥳👍🤘🤘

    • @TheUsmc0802
      @TheUsmc0802 Рік тому +14

      This exactly why we still need them! Gaza/Palestine would be a parking lot in a weekend.

    • @alexigram2381
      @alexigram2381 Рік тому +12

      ​@@TheUsmc0802howdy. Reporting your comment for hate speech & graphic violence.

  • @Allthough
    @Allthough Рік тому

    I know with smaller boats, it's common to repack shaft and rudder seals while in the water. Now, I suppose, the shaft seals on New Jersey have something like 20' head of water pressure on them. But, is it not possible to repack them wet?

    • @jasonmurawski5877
      @jasonmurawski5877 Рік тому +1

      They are specifically designed to be repacked wet. You don’t want to take a ship out of service just because the packing failed

  • @billbillson3129
    @billbillson3129 Рік тому

    ASW! ASW! ASW! Auxiliary Salt Water 4 lyf!!!!! 🤣 thank you for making and sharing the videos!!!!

  • @rickswanberg4995
    @rickswanberg4995 Рік тому

    Is there a plan to replace or rebuild the valve on that condenser while in dry dock?

  • @KJAkk
    @KJAkk Рік тому

    Will you use heavier duty blanks to extend there usable lifespan?

  • @aserta
    @aserta Рік тому +1

    It's entirely possible that the failure was of the metal, not the weld. While they are indeed the entry point if they're done wrong, i have my doubts that any person welding a battleship would be on the level of bad technical education required to fail that bad. Ryan has shown us several elements that at the very least show the intent that the ship would come out of mothballs at least one more time (in terms of how things were done to mothball it). If we follow that logic lay line, it's perfectly ok to assume the metal used wasn't meant to last as long. Kinda like ... putting a dollop of epoxy putty over a leaky pipe. It's not a fix, it's a temporary patch until you get the chance to properly fix it.

  • @vburke1
    @vburke1 Рік тому

    I'd rate repacking the gland seals on par at the top with the blanks. Those old gland seals have GOT to be fragile at this point.

  • @normanlacy3390
    @normanlacy3390 Рік тому +1

    Curious? How do the zinc saltwater anodes react to the freshwater, do they deteriorate faster or slower compared to the aluminum anodes? (Correct me if I am wrong, is aluminum the Way to go for freshwater)

    • @sebastianjezierski8450
      @sebastianjezierski8450 Рік тому +2

      From what Ryan said in previous videos, they deteriorate much slower if at all. They are going to replace them with aluminium in the dry dock.

    • @normanlacy3390
      @normanlacy3390 Рік тому

      @sebastianjezierski8450 thank you hardley miss a video, just figured I'd ask

    • @normanlacy3390
      @normanlacy3390 Рік тому

      Also with tide isn't that brackish water?

  • @jamesturner2126
    @jamesturner2126 Рік тому

    2:20 do the condensers turn "dead" low pressure hot steam into hot boiler feed water? If "dead" steam is condensed, does that mean the steam system is closed? Is the steam system opened, sometimes? Could you make a fun color coded graphic? I don't know how steam powered massive buildings operate!

    • @richcruse2689
      @richcruse2689 Рік тому +1

      BB-62, and all Navy ships are closed loop steam systems. It’s easier to condense and reuse, than to use fresh feed each time.

    • @jamesturner2126
      @jamesturner2126 Рік тому

      @@richcruse2689 I just saw the size of Big J, I thought she could make fresh steam from sea water. Open loop. Like a bunch of locomotives chugging along on the high seas. Cool.

  • @MichaelBridges-ks2hu
    @MichaelBridges-ks2hu 10 місяців тому

    Redo plates and repaint. And zinc. And packing shafts.

  • @Huntress236
    @Huntress236 Рік тому +1

    Alright. I've got an out-there question for you.
    In a zombie apocalypse, how would BBNJ fair as a safe/defendable structure for human survivors?

    • @jimmiles33
      @jimmiles33 Рік тому

      She runs on shore power. So once the grid workers turn into zombies, you have a dark ship. And any ship is fine since you can just remove the gangways and then the zombies can’t get to you.

    • @Huntress236
      @Huntress236 Рік тому

      @@jimmiles33 don't need power to survive lol. Gotta helipad for supply drops too. I think she'd be great. A defensible structure.

  • @davidvavra9113
    @davidvavra9113 Рік тому +4

    B O N D O !

    • @EDKguy
      @EDKguy Рік тому

      Yup. Then a topcoat of Flexseal. Good to go.

  • @markwatson3135
    @markwatson3135 Рік тому

    Is it possible to blank off the valves on the sea chest side as a redundant seal?

    • @themightydropbear
      @themightydropbear Рік тому +1

      You could for some of them but it's honestly better to leave them because when a valve on a system that should be empty suddenly starts leaking seawater, it tells you that your blank has failed, whereas if the sea chest was blanked off on the inside, you wouldn't know anything was wrong until the inner blank failed and flooded the compartment.

    • @vinny142
      @vinny142 Рік тому

      @@themightydropbear "you wouldn't know anything was wrong until the inner blank failed and flooded the compartment."
      A water-level sensor is like $2.50:)
      But I would not blank the inside either though because if there is a leak you still need to get in there to fix it. Leaving water inside it is the last thing you want and if the first thing you do when there is a small leak is to grind the inner plate off again....

  • @maxscholle8932
    @maxscholle8932 Рік тому +4

    Half a curators height

  • @toddrorebeck8417
    @toddrorebeck8417 Рік тому

    I have cleaned out number one main condensers on both USS Iowa and USS Wisconsin. It stinks inside those condensers.

    • @richcruse2689
      @richcruse2689 Рік тому

      I have had the “pleasure” of cleaning out all the condensers on NJ, and some Aux condensers.
      Best time, Brisbane, cleaning out jelly fish, while still hot, to keep ship and gens running. 😊

  • @haydenunsell
    @haydenunsell Рік тому +1

    1.blanks
    2. repacking
    3. repaint
    4. zink.
    what y’all have done over the last 2 decades has worked fairly well. so that’s why zink is at the bottom for me at least.

    • @ferky123
      @ferky123 Рік тому

      Aluminum is replacing the zinc.

    • @haydenunsell
      @haydenunsell Рік тому

      @@ferky123 you know what i mean. i just didn’t want to type everything out.

  • @Decrepit_biker
    @Decrepit_biker Рік тому

    Blanks and coatings, got to keep the inside dry and the rust at bay.

  • @benjaminshropshire2900
    @benjaminshropshire2900 Рік тому +1

    Have you priced sending an ROV underneath? I suspect a professional operator would charge a non-negligible amount for their time, but the buying your own hardware seems to start at under $1k so I'd be shocked if the price for a pro would be too high to ever be worth getting estimates for.

  • @bigsarge2085
    @bigsarge2085 Рік тому +1

    👍👍

  • @turkeyboyjh1
    @turkeyboyjh1 Рік тому

    THROUGH HOLE OPENINGS FIRST
    then anode replacement then gland repacking, any other repairs while you have the money and time then once all repairs are done sand blast and paint remember folks were are keeping this piece of history functional, not pretty function always must come first then left over funds can be used for museum and appearance

  • @DevonRomero-s1b
    @DevonRomero-s1b Рік тому

    Hey Ryan, would $10 million cover everything, or do you need an additional $10 million to cover all your projects?

    • @BattleshipNewJersey
      @BattleshipNewJersey  Рік тому +3

      $10mil would just about cover everything, so we're only a couple million away

  • @DirtyLilHobo
    @DirtyLilHobo Рік тому

    Any chance New Jersey will be called back into service given the rising tensions in the Middle East and the Israel War?

    • @savagecanadian9659
      @savagecanadian9659 Рік тому

      No even if she was being considered she would need probably a year or two of maintenence and upgrading let alone crew training

    • @BattleshipNewJersey
      @BattleshipNewJersey  Рік тому +1

      no

  • @jeffreybrunken556
    @jeffreybrunken556 Рік тому

    👍🏻

  • @CarreraTrackOntheFloor
    @CarreraTrackOntheFloor Рік тому +1

    How is the Iowa and Wisconsin going to prevent failure of their thru hull openings if they have no plans to dry dock?

    • @robertf3479
      @robertf3479 Рік тому +3

      How do you know they don't have plans in the works to drydock their ships? I'm in Norfolk VA and am sure that the Nauticus Museum has a plan for Wisconsin.

    • @pizzaivlife
      @pizzaivlife Рік тому +3

      no plans probably just means no immediate plans. if there was a big issue, they would prioritize it.

    • @dave4882
      @dave4882 Рік тому +2

      bilge pumps.

    • @JoshuaTootell
      @JoshuaTootell Рік тому +1

      New Jersey didn't have plans until recently

    • @CarreraTrackOntheFloor
      @CarreraTrackOntheFloor Рік тому +1

      @@robertf3479 The Iowa museum has said they have no plans. There is no dry dock close to them on the West Coast.

  • @TX-biker
    @TX-biker Рік тому

    Watertight first - then paint

  • @Kyfordman1989
    @Kyfordman1989 11 місяців тому

    I have been trying to talk to you on Facebook messenger sharing pictures of battleships under construction and other things about the US Navy but I do not think I got the right one but you don’t want I can find that has a picture of you and the battleship New Jerseybut there’s no information on this profile whatsoever

  • @outfield1988
    @outfield1988 Рік тому

    Need to get if back in service now.

  • @delavan9141
    @delavan9141 Рік тому

    Watched three of these, really liked the recent one on the propulsion system because we got to see a lot of what you were talking about as you walked us through the ship. But these where you just sit in one place and talk, that is super boring and this will be the last one for me.

  • @uncleroysmusic
    @uncleroysmusic Рік тому +1

    How lazy are people? 193k subs. 19k views. 2.1k likes. wow. it's a click. but it helps.

  • @michaelbridges6058
    @michaelbridges6058 Рік тому

    The battle ship would not do any good in the med

  • @kylehenline3245
    @kylehenline3245 Рік тому

    Man I wish I had 10 million dollars. Are y'all active on twitter? Maybe Bezos or Musk or someone is a naval history nerd!

  • @merlinwizard1000
    @merlinwizard1000 Рік тому +1

    1st, 18 October 2023