Arado Ar 234 Blitz - The First Jet Bomber

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 січ 2021
  • The Arado Ar 234 was an aesthetically graceful and powerful German aircraft that became the world's first operational jet and reconnaissance bomber.
    Built by the Arado Flugzeugwerke company, this unique airplane was powered by two Junkers Jumo 004 B turbojets. It was expected to outrun Allied interceptors such as the de Havilland Mosquito.
    The Blitz, as it was known, operated few missions as a bomber. But the few times it flew, the plane proved to be faster than any other.
    Perhaps in different circumstances, the Ar 234 could've dominated the European skies. But the Blitz entered World War II a little too late.
    It's only relevant participation was with the KG 76 unit during the attempt to destroy the Ludendorff Bridge, one of the last crossings standing at the west bank of the Rhine River.
    Some experts believe that, had its shortcomings been solved sooner, the bomber could've delayed the victory of the Allies and forced a more favorable resolution to the war.
    But what impact this technological marvel might've had in the outcome of the war will never be known. Its participation in history was stopped short, and only one of its kind survives to this day.
    ---
    Join Dark Skies as we explore the world of aviation with cinematic short documentaries featuring the biggest and fastest airplanes ever built, top-secret military projects, and classified missions with hidden untold true stories. Including US, German, and Soviet warplanes, along with aircraft developments that took place during World War I, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and special operations mission in between.
    As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Skies sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect and soundtracks for emotional impact. We do our best to keep it as visually accurate as possible.
    All content on Dark Skies is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas.
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,6 тис.

  • @jamesmaletsky2980
    @jamesmaletsky2980 3 роки тому +181

    Not mentioned in this video of the Blitz bomber is it's advanced features. Pressurized cockpit, ejection seat,and computer. Learned this by reading a book on German aircraft during WW2.

    • @scootergeorge7089
      @scootergeorge7089 2 роки тому +10

      Early models lacked landing gear and relied on a dolly for takeoff and a skid for landing. Taxi after landing was therefore impossible. Rear visibility was so poor, a tank periscope was fitted. Most had to rely on rocker assist engines for takeoff RATO.

    • @troysutton9713
      @troysutton9713 2 роки тому +1

      Thanks for the extra info bro. Good ish

    • @solarfinder
      @solarfinder 2 роки тому

      James, do you recall the name of the book?

    • @mikemooney3500
      @mikemooney3500 2 роки тому +3

      Bollocks

    • @scootergeorge7089
      @scootergeorge7089 2 роки тому +7

      @@mikemooney3500 - That comment must hare required a great deal of thought, Mister Mooney!

  • @SunriseLAW
    @SunriseLAW 3 роки тому +134

    As of this writing on 1.21.21, my father is currently the youngest still surviving American POW of ww-2 after captured as part of "Task Force Baum"... the failed mission to liberate the POW camp at Hammelberg, where Pattons son in law happened to be. Dad got credit for 32 days, 30 was required for POW status. He told of how morale in his POW camp was badly affected when they saw the first German jets fly fast above them. He explained how incredibly fast and other-worldly they were compared to all the prop planes, which reinforced the pervasive rumors of secret German weapons that would turn the war around.

    • @vigilantobserver8389
      @vigilantobserver8389 3 роки тому +31

      That is a fascinating first-person account of this amazing jet. God Bless your father and I thank him for serving!

    • @CH-pv2rz
      @CH-pv2rz 3 роки тому +3

      The German jet was well knows before that time. It had entered combat while the Allies were still hung up in Normandy.

    • @262marcus
      @262marcus 3 роки тому +13

      One flew a photo reconnaissance mission over the Normandy beaches shortly after the invasion. They also flew over the UK. I read one fascinating account by an Arado 234 pilot telling how, whilst flying over the channel towards England, he encountered a British reconnaissance mosquito flying the other way, the pilots just looked at each other and flew on! They were both unarmed in any event.

    • @edwardbruce2318
      @edwardbruce2318 3 роки тому +5

      Theu almost did...
      Few realize how close Washington and few other cities within the USA along with England Cities were to total annihilation from nuclear weapons.....
      You should thank the badass ski teams and elite special forced who stopped them in the process of manipulating water whihc is last key in making weapon

    • @abaddonanon7573
      @abaddonanon7573 2 роки тому

      All things different: it reminds me of how some in Roswell in 1947 saw a composite of plastics and aluminum. And reacted like everyone in 1947 would do. With astonishment! Then the oral tradition kept on and it became because of ayys.

  • @glennkrieger
    @glennkrieger 3 роки тому +33

    What a span of 5 (or 6) years of aeronautical history WWII was. The changes, upgrades, breakthroughs, and designs in aircraft that came and went will likely never be repeated. To do so now would bankrupt almost any country.

    • @theblackhand6485
      @theblackhand6485 3 роки тому +1

      @Glenn Krieger: or you just sell your F35 year and years later for a price beyond imagination and state that it is state of the art technology.

    • @danielescobar7618
      @danielescobar7618 2 роки тому

      Kicking Nazi ass was worth more than any money.

    • @rolandfischer931
      @rolandfischer931 2 роки тому

      There also just isn't as many leaps forward to take anymore

  • @MaxCruise73
    @MaxCruise73 3 роки тому +182

    I have seen this aircraft at the Udvar-Hazy Museum located on one end of Dulles Airport. Beautiful aircraft.

    • @rivotrich7
      @rivotrich7 3 роки тому +11

      Me too. I’ve always been very interested in any jets that entered operations or first flew during WWII.

    • @paoloviti6156
      @paoloviti6156 3 роки тому +10

      I never saw it but I understood that it was beautifully restored...

    • @IGNACY-fp8zo
      @IGNACY-fp8zo 3 роки тому +3

      I saw it, but unfortunately when they started making renovations

    • @paoloviti6156
      @paoloviti6156 3 роки тому +3

      @@IGNACY-fp8zo already doing renovation on an airplane that was restored something like 10 years ago? Have they ruined it🥺?

    • @IGNACY-fp8zo
      @IGNACY-fp8zo 3 роки тому +6

      @@paoloviti6156
      No, the building was under renovation and they covered it up with plastic wrap
      You could see it, but it wasn’t that nice
      I think they are restoring “Flak Bait” though, unless that’s also been going on for a decade

  • @midnightteapot5633
    @midnightteapot5633 3 роки тому +7

    One of the test pilots for this aircraft was a young Junkers 88 pilot named Gunther Eheim . He went on to develop a multi- million dollar company developing and selling innovative and ultra high quality Aquarium filtration equipment under the EHIEM brand name.

  • @snicketysnickerdoodle8484
    @snicketysnickerdoodle8484 3 роки тому +62

    When you think you've seen all the German WW2 wonder weapons, something you haven't seen before always comes up.

    • @stacystables117
      @stacystables117 3 роки тому

      Which one was the most impressive for you?

    • @snicketysnickerdoodle8484
      @snicketysnickerdoodle8484 3 роки тому +7

      @@stacystables117 Ho 229. You?

    • @stacystables117
      @stacystables117 3 роки тому +9

      @@snicketysnickerdoodle8484
      Hard to say. I am fascinated by the developments of surface-to-air missiles such as Rheintochter, Feuerlilie, Taifun, Wasserfall or HS117 Schmetterling.
      Had any of these weapons been suitable and massively used, our major cities might look a little nicer today....
      But also "joystick"-guided glide bombs like Fritz X or the HS 293 (with video transmission) have their fascination for me.

    • @tB3o3tR9o9
      @tB3o3tR9o9 Рік тому +2

      Don't you know the Haunebu and Vril Flying Saucers?

    • @goldfing5898
      @goldfing5898 Рік тому +1

      @@stacystables117 Or the Ruhrstahl X-4 guided air-to-air-missile.

  • @markjones7185
    @markjones7185 3 роки тому +14

    Incredible, historic footage. Always thank the people who filmed, processed, and restored this history. And after all these years I'm seeing footage of the Arado for the first time. What a machine.

  • @ravenmcclaw1725
    @ravenmcclaw1725 3 роки тому +14

    It is truly amazing how fast the technology was advancing during this 2 world wars.
    I mean the first airplane was flying 1903, then in WW1 heavy bombers and first Arial combats, in WW2 we had already jet powered engines, it's 40 years between the first airplane and a jet powered airplane.

    • @keirfarnum6811
      @keirfarnum6811 Рік тому

      That is remarkable when one thinks about it.

    • @OuterHeaven210
      @OuterHeaven210 7 місяців тому

      And in 25 years from the end of world war two we will be on the moon

  • @channelsixtysix066
    @channelsixtysix066 3 роки тому +451

    The short comings weren't due to the airframe, but the engines. That is understandable, since they were at the cutting edge of development.

    • @at6686
      @at6686 3 роки тому +55

      They were also made out of whatever materials that were available. Jet engines need special alloys to with stand the tremendous temperatures and stresses of jet power. Germany didn’t have access to them.

    • @weirdshibainu
      @weirdshibainu 3 роки тому +36

      True. We take it for granted now, but the evolution from prop engines to jet engines is a quantum leap in technology. The Germans were hampered by the lack of exotic materials necessary to manage the high temperatures jet engine produce. Still, it's amazing they got as far as they did with what they had to work with.

    • @channelsixtysix066
      @channelsixtysix066 3 роки тому +7

      @@at6686 Yes, and it's likely the metallurgy wasn't completely understood anyway. You could only find out these problems by doing it. First principles can only take you so far.

    • @channelsixtysix066
      @channelsixtysix066 3 роки тому +11

      @@weirdshibainu It is quite extraordinary what the Germans achieved. Let's not forget Whittle's development, hampered by British indifference during WW2, finally giving up and moving to the US. Notice one huge problem ..... durability. By just 10 hours, the engines need rebuilding, by 25 hours, they were scrap metal. The other problem was fuel consumption. There was the operational characteristic too, of the engine taking time to wind up to full power. It was one of the reasons why the Ju-287 bomber had forward-swept wings, to give more lift.

    • @weirdshibainu
      @weirdshibainu 3 роки тому +5

      @@channelsixtysix066 All true. While a technological marvel, it's high fuel consumption was a particular disadvantage given Germany's chronic and punitive oil shortage. Paradoxically, even if this had been introduced earlier in the war, if built in large numbers, it would have cannibalized fuel at an even higher rate with little change in outcome of the war.

  • @Getpojke
    @Getpojke 3 роки тому +30

    WOW! Many decades spent on history with WWII being a fave and I didn't know this. Well done.

    • @Lasstpak
      @Lasstpak 3 роки тому +5

      How

    • @jjojo2004
      @jjojo2004 3 роки тому +3

      If one knew about the ME-262, one would’ve known about the other jets the Luftwaffe had, right? 🤔🤔🤔

    • @Lasstpak
      @Lasstpak 3 роки тому +3

      @@jjojo2004 Or just knew anything about Luftwaffe during ww2. This like saying. Omg I am so into Napoleonic wars but I never heard about Wellington in Spain. Lelele

  • @weirdshibainu
    @weirdshibainu 3 роки тому +64

    It's technology like this that justified "Operation Paperclip"

    • @IvorMektin1701
      @IvorMektin1701 3 роки тому +8

      Yep, it wasn't just rockets.

    • @PureAmericanPatriot
      @PureAmericanPatriot 3 роки тому +18

      It's too bad they had to go be a bunch of Nazis on the rest of the world. However, much in the way slavery delayed the adoption of steam and gas powered mechanical agricultural technology in the U.S., I sometimes wonder if the Nazis relied too much on slave labor and didn't take advantage of the incredible minds that they ended up killing off. How many of these revolutionary technologies were delayed, ever so little, by not taking advantage of the engineers they had wasting away on menial labor.

    • @IvorMektin1701
      @IvorMektin1701 3 роки тому +9

      @@PureAmericanPatriot
      Excellent point!
      When I was little, there was an ancient man in my neighborhood named Dr. Eckstein. Decorated Imperial German artillery officer and mathematics professor. He fled Germany in 1935 and became an American artillery instructor at Ft. Sill. Those maniacs drove out perfectly good talent.

    • @andrewlanford2378
      @andrewlanford2378 3 роки тому +4

      My cousin- Josef Spinnler- was one of the many rocket scientists smuggled into the country to work for the U.S. government...

    • @brunos6599
      @brunos6599 3 роки тому +3

      @@andrewlanford2378 Not many people go around telling that a relative was in paperclip to work for the U.S.

  • @Antonluisre
    @Antonluisre 3 роки тому +11

    This aircraft was such an awesome sight when I visited the air and space museum as a kid. What a magnificent piece of engineering.

    • @edwardhotchkiss9085
      @edwardhotchkiss9085 Рік тому

      The aircraft inoressed me also in a visit to silver hill restoration facility A&S

  • @AndyinMokum
    @AndyinMokum 3 роки тому +327

    The De Havilland Mosquito was nicknamed the "wooden wonder", not the "wooden bomber".

    • @Ob1sdarkside
      @Ob1sdarkside 3 роки тому +5

      Thank you.

    • @AndyinMokum
      @AndyinMokum 3 роки тому +3

      @@Ob1sdarkside 😃!

    • @Iahusha777Iahuah
      @Iahusha777Iahuah 3 роки тому +21

      This channel always has mistakes and never seems to get better. Must a be a few kids doing this

    • @snoopstp4189
      @snoopstp4189 3 роки тому +7

      A book I read on the Mosquito said their nic was "the mossie".

    • @daszieher
      @daszieher 3 роки тому +12

      @@snoopstp4189 planes often had several nicknames. Wooden Wonder and Mossie are both correct.

  • @1badhaircut
    @1badhaircut 3 роки тому +167

    “Not living-up to expectations” is true but by that time German planes were FAR out-numbered and the jets weren’t perfected- pilots inexperienced. Under end-of-the-war and beginning-of-jet-technology it was impressive.

    • @schizo1382
      @schizo1382 3 роки тому +3

      american pilots were inexperienced tho...and not far outnumbered,only at the end of the war

    • @sandervanderkammen9230
      @sandervanderkammen9230 3 роки тому +2

      In terms of jet bombers the Germans were certainly not outnumbered... the Allies did not have any jet bombers during WW2.

    • @semihegeakdogan4964
      @semihegeakdogan4964 2 роки тому +1

      The allied intersted in this tech so they make operation paperclip

    • @JohnRodriguesPhotographer
      @JohnRodriguesPhotographer 2 роки тому

      Vulnerability of the German jet aircraft is during landing and take off their engines didn't spool up real fast. You couldn't just jam the throttles forward. American fighters with the lawyer around known German air bases with jet fighters and bombers and they would pick them off when they would come into land. This forced the Germans to fly a combat Air patrol over their bases whenever they were operating the Jets. The Air patrol was either BF 109s or FW 190s. The biggest weakness of the ar-234 as a design was the complete lack of rearward visibility. If you could get behind them low and slow they wouldn't even know you were there. Ultimately the fix was to put a tank Periscope onto the AR 234 with an aerodynamic fairing to look backwards.

    • @tompiper9276
      @tompiper9276 2 роки тому +1

      @@sandervanderkammen9230 Didn't need them. The Nazis were being pummelled day and night by Liberators, B17s Lacasters etc...

  • @JohnJohansen2
    @JohnJohansen2 3 роки тому

    Yet another great video. Thanks a lot.

  • @anthonykeel1058
    @anthonykeel1058 3 роки тому

    Thank you for another awesome video!
    Have still yet to see the only example and can’t wait to see that and the DO 335 next to it.

  • @christophermancini7380
    @christophermancini7380 3 роки тому +238

    The narrator neglected to mention the latter four engined variant, although it's shown several times in the video.

    • @fordgalaxiefanclub7733
      @fordgalaxiefanclub7733 3 роки тому +8

      very true

    • @tylerdurden4006
      @tylerdurden4006 3 роки тому +36

      That's bcoz they don't do research or fact-check or even care about what they are saying as long it gets views...

    • @CH-pv2rz
      @CH-pv2rz 3 роки тому +12

      @@tylerdurden4006 Yes indeed, the boneheads at this channel are nitwits!

    • @chuichinagumo7145
      @chuichinagumo7145 3 роки тому +26

      He did mention the 4 engine variant, at 6:48. You either don’t know the name or didn’t hear him mention it. The 4 engine production variant is the C series, ranging from C-1 to C-4. By the end of the war barely over a dozen airframes were complete and many lacked engines. Their impact on engineering and the war as a whole is so minuscule that I assume that the author of the script neglected to mention them for that reason. Regardless they’re certainly visually distinct and there are a lot of pictures and footage of the few complete models, which I assume is why people think their use throughout the war is more prolific than in actuality.

    • @sandervanderkammen9230
      @sandervanderkammen9230 3 роки тому +4

      @@chuichinagumo7145 Allied jet aircraft had even less impact on the course of the war...

  • @emaheiwa8174
    @emaheiwa8174 3 роки тому +99

    I love this plane to death 😍 by far one of the best looking planes ever. Sleek AF

    • @ericbrammer2245
      @ericbrammer2245 3 роки тому

      If you ever play 'Jane's WW-2 Fighters', it'll outrun your P-38, easily!

    • @hertzair1186
      @hertzair1186 3 роки тому +2

      Wonder if a swept wing variant was ever in the thoughts of those brilliant German Engineers

    • @cqpp
      @cqpp 3 роки тому +5

      @@hertzair1186 Me262 HG II? Several were built and a wooden mock up of the Me262 HG III. You also had the P.1101 which would have been the first supersonic jet, though it was 85% completed before the war came to an end.

    • @grochomarx2002
      @grochomarx2002 3 роки тому +2

      A beautiful aircraft

    • @sandervanderkammen9230
      @sandervanderkammen9230 2 роки тому

      @@hertzair1186 Yes, there was... it became the Boeing B-47

  • @GunRescue
    @GunRescue 3 роки тому +1

    Love the videos!!! Thanks

  • @samfosdick9874
    @samfosdick9874 2 роки тому +1

    Grace in motion .. wonderfully beautiful for it's time

  • @paoloviti6156
    @paoloviti6156 3 роки тому +4

    Maybe a small correction: the Arado Ar 234 Blitz was the world's first operational jet-powered bomber and secondly a reconnaissance as this was preceeded by the Me 262A in this role. Produced in limited numbers it was used almost entirely in the reconnaissance role. In its few uses as a bomber it proved to be nearly impossible to intercept. It was the last Luftwaffe aircraft to fly over the UK during the war, in April 1945

  • @martentrudeau6948
    @martentrudeau6948 3 роки тому +18

    Wow, what a plane for the 1940s. It was the future!

  • @randlerobbertson8792
    @randlerobbertson8792 2 роки тому +2

    This, the heinkel 219, me163 and the me 262 are all my favourite aeroplanes . I distictly remember being given a hippo aircraft book in the 1960s, there was a darkened black and white photo of the Ar 234B in it and it stuck in my mind being modern looking . futuristic and menacing

  • @MGBandit75
    @MGBandit75 3 роки тому

    Great video! Never knew of this amazing air craft until now.x

  • @neilwilson5785
    @neilwilson5785 3 роки тому +126

    The Mosquito was referred to as the Wooden Wonder, or Mossie, not Wooden Bomber. Great video though.

    • @roshambo5895
      @roshambo5895 3 роки тому +11

      I used to fly one of these back in the day. We all called it the wooden bomber.

    • @saxyboi533
      @saxyboi533 3 роки тому

      @@roshambo5895 OMG and how did it feel?

    • @FairlyOldGit
      @FairlyOldGit 3 роки тому +10

      @@roshambo5895 I suspect you weren't even a twinkle in your fathers eye when the Mosquito was being flown - If I'm wrong do tell us more about your flying experience.

    • @AtheistOrphan
      @AtheistOrphan 3 роки тому +8

      @@roshambo5895 - I highly doubt you did, and this is the first time in over 40 years as an aviation enthusiast I’ve ever heard it referred to as such. Always been ‘The Wooden Wonder’.

    • @x67th
      @x67th 3 роки тому +3

      @@roshambo5895 No you didn't.

  • @Mrgunsngear
    @Mrgunsngear 3 роки тому +7

    thanks

  • @e.d.4824
    @e.d.4824 2 роки тому

    Great video, thanks and congratulations !

  • @michaelvalesano3541
    @michaelvalesano3541 3 роки тому

    love your channel(s)...keep up the great work

  • @Capt.Turner
    @Capt.Turner 3 роки тому +5

    Good one !
    One minor mistake on the Ludendorf bridge.
    Actually the rigged explosives went off for the bigger part but they only had industrial grade explosives at their disposal which weakened the explosion considerably.
    The bridge lifted up and fell back on its pillars, damaged but not destroyed.

  • @rustyheckler8766
    @rustyheckler8766 3 роки тому +49

    Dark skies, we read wikis so you don't have too.

  • @charlesachurch7265
    @charlesachurch7265 2 роки тому

    Great presentation thanks xxx

  • @steveshoemaker6347
    @steveshoemaker6347 3 роки тому

    Thanks....Once again...!

  • @Schlipperschlopper
    @Schlipperschlopper 3 роки тому +19

    This lookes modern even by 1950s standards!

  • @gort8203
    @gort8203 3 роки тому +36

    Maximum speed of 480 mph at 6000 miles! Good trick with a range of only 1240 miles. Who writes this stuff...

    • @gort8203
      @gort8203 3 роки тому +13

      @@mikusoxlongius Yeah, I bet it was supposed to be 6000 meters, a more sensible altitude for a jet's top speed.

    • @Iahusha777Iahuah
      @Iahusha777Iahuah 3 роки тому +9

      Haha ya they suck at making videos. They are only good with this cool mood and music thats it. Mistakes everywhere never getting better

    • @jackd1582
      @jackd1582 3 роки тому

      @@mikusoxlongius metres Bud

  • @tootone
    @tootone 3 роки тому

    Awesome! So much content I love it!

  • @Wideoval73
    @Wideoval73 2 роки тому

    Excellent review. Keep up the good work.

  • @MrEvanfriend
    @MrEvanfriend 3 роки тому +19

    Oh cool, I've seen one of these at the Udvar-Hazy museum in Virginia. Didn't know it was the only one left.

    • @theblackhand6485
      @theblackhand6485 3 роки тому +3

      It was stolen!

    • @troygroomes104
      @troygroomes104 3 роки тому +1

      What about the British museum AR234 , or is that a replica

    • @billkea7224
      @billkea7224 2 роки тому +1

      @@theblackhand6485 It was reparations.

    • @AtheistOrphan
      @AtheistOrphan 2 роки тому +1

      @@troygroomes104 - There isn’t one in the British Museum (or anywhere else for that matter). Also, there are no aircraft whatsoever in the British Museum, it’s an archeological museum.

    • @tompiper9276
      @tompiper9276 2 роки тому

      @@AtheistOrphan got some amazing Mesopotanian pottery though. Cutting edge kit from 6500 years ago.

  • @10fantic
    @10fantic 3 роки тому +8

    All these uploads are making me get way too excited, good job 👏

  • @kRuss-sc4ed
    @kRuss-sc4ed 3 роки тому +2

    Great vid

  • @americanpatriot2422
    @americanpatriot2422 Рік тому

    Outstanding video and presentation.

  • @juststeve5542
    @juststeve5542 3 роки тому +40

    1:50 Nicknamed the "wooden bomber"
    NO! It's was/is nicknamed the Wooden Wonder! Honestly, get some fact checkers in! It's in the first paragraph of the wiki entry!
    I really enjoy your videos (when the audio mix doesn't completely obscure your voice), but I continually spot errors which makes me doubt the rest of the "facts".

    • @g2macs
      @g2macs 3 роки тому +1

      Damn! That's not fair, I wanted to tell him off.

    • @ianmansfield68
      @ianmansfield68 3 роки тому

      That was the Mosquito (first paragraph here):
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Mosquito
      Whilst I generally agree about their sketchy fact checking, I couldn't find a reference to either nickname in the Arado 234 wiki page:
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arado_Ar_234

  • @sir3612
    @sir3612 3 роки тому +5

    I love your content it’s really informative and interesting. Could you maybe do some more post WWII aircraft?

  • @malcolmjcullen
    @malcolmjcullen 3 роки тому +1

    Always thought this was a really attractive plane. So elegant and simple in its form.

  • @markmuldoon805
    @markmuldoon805 2 роки тому

    One of the best you have done. At least the vision matched (as well as you have managed) what you are saying.

  • @admiralradish
    @admiralradish 3 роки тому +6

    My favorite WW2 Aircraft. Next to the FW190

    • @Bye-kd8xo
      @Bye-kd8xo 3 роки тому

      Fw190 is a sexy beast

    • @cdilandro67
      @cdilandro67 3 роки тому

      @@Bye-kd8xo If you love the FW190, then you will worship the Ta 152 H then.

    • @audimanuk
      @audimanuk 3 роки тому

      Nothing came close to the amount of ordnance and punishment the ‘ Butcher Bird’ could take, awsum plane, later variants had liquid cooled engines and 20 mm cannon, when the rear gunner on the B17’s saw one bearing down he’d cross himself say two hail Mary’s and rub the rabbits foot in his pocket !

  • @kimchipig
    @kimchipig 3 роки тому +257

    The Mosquito was known as, "the wooden wonder," not the wooden bomber.

    • @HesH_WT
      @HesH_WT 3 роки тому +1

      yep it was not a bomber far from it

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 3 роки тому +11

      @@HesH_WT It was wooden. Some marks were bombers and could carry the same load a the B17.

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 3 роки тому +3

      @@HesH_WT Respect to your family, sir. My family made Rotol airscrews.

    • @raypurchase801
      @raypurchase801 3 роки тому +2

      @@HesH_WT Thankyou for your correction, Hesh.

    • @FunnyPrankLaughs
      @FunnyPrankLaughs 3 роки тому +3

      And the engines on the arado were not the Jumo 004, when production began, they moved to the BMW 003 jet.

  • @pushbikeman
    @pushbikeman 3 роки тому

    Excellent Work!

  • @Administrator_O-5
    @Administrator_O-5 3 роки тому +1

    Another home run video as usual!

  • @brokenursa9986
    @brokenursa9986 3 роки тому +5

    I've seen that last remaining Ar 234 in person. It's a much smaller plane than it looks like in photos and video. Once you see it up close, you realize that it's only about the size of a pickup truck, like a Chevy Silverado.

    • @andreshkt
      @andreshkt 3 роки тому

      Ryan Cauffman But. bites hard.

    • @allanblack8990
      @allanblack8990 2 роки тому

      Years ago, I saw it being restored on a visit to Silver Springs Maryland

  • @johancronisk3405
    @johancronisk3405 3 роки тому +6

    Dark skies and dark files are so well made. Always impressive.

    • @lanesplitter8723
      @lanesplitter8723 2 роки тому +1

      Hmmm, yes and no. The information is frequently dicey. It's ok for casual viewing, but I wouldn't go taking what they say as gospel. For example, within one minute of this video the narrator misquoted the mosquito's nickname. Others have pointed out the stranr omission of not mentioning the four engines variant of this aircraft. Small mistakes, but they add up.

  • @nicolasmahdavian1793
    @nicolasmahdavian1793 3 роки тому

    Another great video.

  • @onemantwohands5224
    @onemantwohands5224 2 роки тому

    What an awesome front end !! Great doco!

  • @burningb2439
    @burningb2439 3 роки тому +19

    The Arado 234 was sex with wings it's Design was fantastic , revolutionary but it was to bloody late . an we had the Moz , fast simple an not over Engineered but still a Babe . Great Vid .

    • @markir9
      @markir9 3 роки тому +1

      Yep, similar story with the He 219...luckily for the allies, management infighting kept several of these game changing aircraft from arriving in quantity.

    • @Ori--pw5vw
      @Ori--pw5vw 3 роки тому

      Dude I think you are on the wrong website your comment makes me think of your from phub

    • @kilianfirebolt
      @kilianfirebolt 2 роки тому

      The problem at the end of the war was: more planes than pilots. American pilots were told to kill germans in their parachutes if they bail over germany

  • @TopSecretVid
    @TopSecretVid 3 роки тому +3

    still a badass plane even today.

  • @hojoj.1974
    @hojoj.1974 3 роки тому +1

    Great Job.

  • @charlesmanning5819
    @charlesmanning5819 3 роки тому +1

    That’s one awesome looking aircraft 🤩

  • @AtheistOrphan
    @AtheistOrphan 3 роки тому +22

    One of my all-time favourite aeroplanes. Read Captain Eric ‘Winkle’ Brown’s account of flying them. Fascinating!

    • @creepingjesus5106
      @creepingjesus5106 2 роки тому +5

      One guy who could justifiably claim to have flown 'everything'!

    • @alfredfabulous3640
      @alfredfabulous3640 Рік тому

      Right....like Richard Perlier on the german side.

  • @flufanga
    @flufanga 3 роки тому +9

    Always bear in mind when viewing videos like this: they worked tens of thousands to death in their armament factories.

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 3 роки тому

    Thanks for the vid 👍🇳🇿

  • @Yauu2
    @Yauu2 3 роки тому +2

    Nice! Great video, great plane. Now for the machine standing next to the Ar-234 in the museum, the Do-335.

  • @alanhaynes418
    @alanhaynes418 2 роки тому +7

    One of the Luftwaffe's last sorties over the UK during the last couple of days of WW2 was a reconnaissance by an Ar 234 over East Anglia - completely unchallenged, nothing could catch it.
    Such was the inertia of the German war machine, that they were still doing recon over the UK when Germany lay in ruins!

    • @kyleboatright7403
      @kyleboatright7403 Рік тому

      Should have done more recon leading up to June 6, 1944. Glad they didn't.

  • @Prophet_waffle
    @Prophet_waffle 3 роки тому +4

    I’ve seen this and it looked so strange given I knew it was from ww2. I hadn’t heard of it before seeing it and I’m glad that I now know it’s complete history.

  • @cahg3871
    @cahg3871 3 роки тому +2

    My late foster father who at one time worked on the Avro Arrow,(he was a machinist and sweet metal technician)believed that if Germany had managed to get the flying wing to work and into mass production,it may have turned the tide in Germany’s war effort.He had great respect for German aeronautics and for Warner Von Braun in particular.
    Nicholas Seidl,1929-2020.

    • @mariannepompa4152
      @mariannepompa4152 3 роки тому

      chris goodayle: The HORTEN 229 would have turned the tide in Germany’s war effor

    • @alfredfabulous3640
      @alfredfabulous3640 Рік тому

      Bullcrap.....nothing - with exception perhaps of a few dozen nuclear devices (luckily something the _Third Reich_ could not manage to produce due to lacking industrial resources) - could have but saved the day for Nazi-Germay!

  • @kRuss-sc4ed
    @kRuss-sc4ed 3 роки тому

    Keep them coming

  • @thomasburke7995
    @thomasburke7995 3 роки тому +5

    For future reference.. when narrating and referencing the air and space section of the Smithsonian.. please refer to the udvar-hazy building located in Dulles Virginia adjacent to Dulles airport . Thier are two air and space museums and they are 40 miles apart.

  • @samuelparker9882
    @samuelparker9882 3 роки тому +9

    I've always admired the lines of this aircraft and airframe. In all of its variants. Even more than the Me-262. It was fast. However, it couldn't have done hardly anything or much damage as a bomber. It was simply too small and couldn't hold more than 2 to 4 500 pound bombs, IF that many at all.

    • @bg147
      @bg147 2 роки тому +2

      It carried a couple of 1100 pounders or a 2200 pounder. It was the first jet bomber.

  • @oscaralbertolobato8914
    @oscaralbertolobato8914 3 роки тому

    Hermosa aeronave!!!!!
    Precursora total !!!!

  • @mineralin641
    @mineralin641 Рік тому

    As a Norwegian. Your pronounciation of Stavanger was really good. Great video

  • @kethanyelundur3485
    @kethanyelundur3485 3 роки тому +16

    I saw this amazing aircraft at the Smithsonian Air and Space its so perfect

  • @thomasbernecky2078
    @thomasbernecky2078 3 роки тому +5

    I got to sit in the cockpit the of one restored for the Smithsonian when it was completed but not shipped to Dulles.

  • @jordonberkove7438
    @jordonberkove7438 3 роки тому

    Love your vids Bro

  • @Beautifultruthofficial
    @Beautifultruthofficial 3 роки тому

    Beautiful

  • @gourishankar52
    @gourishankar52 3 роки тому +13

    The DH Mosquito was affectionatley called the 'Wooden wonder' by the allies because its skin was made from a sandwich of plywood and balsa woods. It did not have a wooden frame but the monocoque fuselage was formed over solid forners in two halves, the internals were then added and the two sections glued together with an early type of epoxy resin glue (which went on to become Araldite). The prototype was 25 miles an hour faster than the Spitfire V, the top RAF fighter of the day. Originally envisaged as a fast reconaisance aircraft and light bomber it went on to serve in a variety of roles from heavy fighter to pathfinder to intruder to anti-shipping strike aircraft. It remained in RAF use well into the 1950s. The Germans admired it and tried to build a similar aircraft, but couldn't get the glue right. Luftwaffe pilots lucky enough to shoot one down were awarded two kills. Nightfighter Mosquitos were sent over with the RAF heavy bombers, tasked with shooting down German nightfighters. This led to the German nigtfighter crews suffering from 'Mosquito-schrek' - fear of the Mosquito. BTW Mark Felton does this kind of thing so much better.

    • @x67th
      @x67th 3 роки тому

      Last sentence is debatable. The guy cant even work out how to mix audio correctly. And has to remind himself what he looks like every video. But good one.

    • @ianholmquist8492
      @ianholmquist8492 3 роки тому +1

      @@x67th at least Mark Felton gets his facts right. There are usually at least a handful of poorly researched or just plain wrong details in each of the videos from this channel.

    • @x67th
      @x67th 3 роки тому +1

      @@ianholmquist8492 Not 100% of the time he doesn't. Just like every other channel. And this channel doesn't claim to be 100% pin point accurate either. But they do a good job at getting a majority of it correct.

    • @Lukeee91
      @Lukeee91 3 роки тому

      "BTW Mark Felton does this kind of thing so much better." Both Mark Felton and this channel only recite Wikipedia articles on whatever topic matter they are discussing in the videos. Without referencing the sources.

    • @gourishankar52
      @gourishankar52 3 роки тому +1

      @@Lukeee91 You have a point. References are important. I just found it irritating that this channel claimed that the Arado 234 was built in response to the DH Mosquito. Actually Focke-Wulf built a prototype wooden heavy fighter (Ta 154) that they called the Moskito but it was not a success because they didn't have the right glue to get the plywood laminations to stay together.

  • @George_M_
    @George_M_ 3 роки тому +15

    Having seen it in person, it's *tiny*!

  • @baselhammond3317
    @baselhammond3317 3 роки тому

    Looks very elegant in that first shot

  • @colingold3821
    @colingold3821 3 роки тому

    So addicted to these mini docs! Love all the vids and channels!

  • @silvanski
    @silvanski 3 роки тому +41

    The skid was replaced with a retractable three-wheel landing gear

  • @cyclingnerddelux698
    @cyclingnerddelux698 3 роки тому +40

    Ernst Udet didn't pass away. He shot himself.

    • @828enigma6
      @828enigma6 3 роки тому +3

      Was it suicide or a murder by a competing manufacturer?

    • @jonmcgee6987
      @jonmcgee6987 3 роки тому +6

      @@828enigma6 Suicide. The position he held had him stressed out really bad. He blamed it on Goering and said as much in a note he left.

    • @SolarWebsite
      @SolarWebsite 3 роки тому +17

      I'm quite sure that the passing away happened shortly after the shooting part....

    • @supdude5194
      @supdude5194 3 роки тому +4

      Who knows, maybe the guy who replaced him set him up and made it look like a suicide to usurp his position. It could have been that someone in the German army wanted his own agent or whatever to hold that position and killed the guy to imbed his soldier. I'm not saying it was an enemy of Hitler but someone could have wanted to stand in his favor.

    • @leroyjenkins4811
      @leroyjenkins4811 3 роки тому

      Maybe the narrator was trying not to be so graphic. Children watch these videos sometimes. Saying someone “passed away” versus saying “the man was under a tremendous amount of stress, was extremely unhappy with his job, and killed himself” doesn’t sound very nice. It raises a lot of questions. Questions a parent might find difficult to answer. We all know the man killed himself. Explaining that to kids might not be a good time for anybody. The content is supposed to be appropriate for all ages.

  • @jayweber3020
    @jayweber3020 3 роки тому

    best video yet

  • @AJ-bz3vs
    @AJ-bz3vs 3 роки тому

    More like this, please!

  • @RodanES
    @RodanES 3 роки тому +4

    He should do a video on the puma armored cars used in ww2 like the sdkfz 234/2

  • @dominicrichardson5546
    @dominicrichardson5546 3 роки тому +5

    Wow, imagine going from being a flying ace of the cloth planes of ww1 to designing a cutting edge jet powered bomber in ww2! What amazing advancements warfare brings us

    • @alfredfabulous3640
      @alfredfabulous3640 Рік тому

      Okay....so the next war shall bring us phaser weapons and warp devices - you think?

    • @dominicrichardson5546
      @dominicrichardson5546 Рік тому

      @@alfredfabulous3640 I'd be more interested in transport advancements. Like cleaner, more powerful jet engines. Stuff that would benefit the consumer market once the war was over.

    • @alfredfabulous3640
      @alfredfabulous3640 Рік тому

      @@dominicrichardson5546 trust me....the next big war shall be the last one of humanity.
      No human afterwards then....

  • @nickespina1975
    @nickespina1975 3 роки тому +2

    Beautiful bird!

  • @KyleCowden
    @KyleCowden 3 роки тому

    I had one in my FS 2004 install. I have no idea how realistic it was but it was very fun to fly.

  • @Im_Pinny
    @Im_Pinny 3 роки тому +3

    Oh you're using one of dreams music for speedrun nice!

  • @margussaar9897
    @margussaar9897 3 роки тому +33

    Make a video on dornier do 335 the "arrow"

    • @threadworm437
      @threadworm437 3 роки тому +4

      @Daniel Large yeah the maneuverability wasn't very good but the acceleration, top speed,and high altitude performance was insane.

    • @zillsburyy1
      @zillsburyy1 3 роки тому +9

      mark felton has a video on that

    • @Iahusha777Iahuah
      @Iahusha777Iahuah 3 роки тому

      Why so I can see more narrations information mistakes

  • @michaelshortland8863
    @michaelshortland8863 3 роки тому +1

    A Very Beautiful Aircraft.

  • @mereclander
    @mereclander 3 роки тому +1

    Amazing plane!!!

  • @jimmihenry
    @jimmihenry 3 роки тому +5

    13:50 "... never lived up to it's expectations" But it did, it could out speed every plane. Even a fast and nimble fighter!

    • @nathanblades3395
      @nathanblades3395 3 роки тому +1

      And then you have to rebuild the engines

    • @jimmihenry
      @jimmihenry 3 роки тому +1

      @@nathanblades3395 And this is the same today! Only the intervals got longer due advanced alloys.

    • @nathanblades3395
      @nathanblades3395 3 роки тому

      @@jimmihenry ya but you dont have to rebuild the engine every time you fly in a modren jet so its more cost effective the Germans were short on materials and gas also so thats why it was a no go

    • @sandervanderkammen9230
      @sandervanderkammen9230 3 роки тому

      @@nathanblades3395 All high performance engines used in combat during WW2 had extremely short TBOs by today's standards this was also true in the Korean War..
      F-86 Sabre engines could require an overhaul in as little as 12 hours of flight time.

    • @sandervanderkammen9230
      @sandervanderkammen9230 3 роки тому

      @@nathanblades3395 The Jumo 004b engines exceeded the RLMs 100 hours PFTR reliability test, this is the exact same 100 hours required by the RAF and USAAF during WW2.
      Tests conducted by Operation Lusty found TBOs compareable to Allied piston engines.

  • @no-legjohnny3691
    @no-legjohnny3691 3 роки тому +16

    Yet for some reason, even though it proved to be faster than any other aircraft that the allies used, it's outran by a La-5 in WT...

  • @robbabcock_
    @robbabcock_ 3 роки тому +1

    Very cool plane!

  • @stephenbritton9297
    @stephenbritton9297 3 роки тому

    Both the Air and Space Annex at Dulles and the USAF museum at Wright-Pat are AMAZING!!! I liked the Annex over the regular Air and Space Museum...

  • @wassermauserichlucio9682
    @wassermauserichlucio9682 3 роки тому +45

    Imagine in one of these at BR 7.3 being chased by some swedish BR 8.3 missle.
    Yes that's me.

  • @davidgifford8112
    @davidgifford8112 3 роки тому +8

    Knowing you were flying the best fighter and diving in your P51s onto a flight of Arado Bliz bombers, only to see them accurate out of harms way must have been like watching the future.

    • @keirfarnum6811
      @keirfarnum6811 Рік тому

      “...’accurate’ out of harm’s way?” Do you mean “accelerate?”

  • @mombaassa
    @mombaassa 3 роки тому +1

    INCORRECT: At 2:02 it's claimed work on the Arado bomber commenced in 1940, as a response to the De Havilland Mosquito. Not true. The Mosquito would not enter service until mid 1941.

  • @tonytiger2914
    @tonytiger2914 2 роки тому

    Better than expected.

  • @Imp5011
    @Imp5011 3 роки тому +7

    It feels abit churlish to criticise but the engine at 4:50 looks very much like a Whittle turbojet.

    • @paoloviti6156
      @paoloviti6156 3 роки тому +1

      The Jumo 004B was an axial flow engine and was completely different from the Whittle's Turbojet as It was an Centrifugal Compressor and used Whittle's "reverse flow" design making it a much larger frontal area. The photo of Whittle's engine was placed by mistake...

    • @angusmatheson8906
      @angusmatheson8906 3 роки тому +5

      @@paoloviti6156 THis channel constantly, CONSTANTLY makes really fucking basic mistakes. They actually suck real bad.

    • @leneanderthalien
      @leneanderthalien 3 роки тому

      @@paoloviti6156 arados doest use jumos: they did use BMW 003 turbojets (who was still axial)

    • @paoloviti6156
      @paoloviti6156 3 роки тому +1

      @@leneanderthalien there was two versions: the Ar 234B that was fitted with two Jumo 004B and the Ar 234C that was fitted with 4 BMW 003. Both were axial flow engines...

    • @Imp5011
      @Imp5011 2 роки тому

      @Last chance Cowboy So intolerant of German technical sophistication I clicked on a video about an Arado?

  • @6old_YT
    @6old_YT 3 роки тому +4

    C'mon do a video on the Me-163

  • @dougwalker4944
    @dougwalker4944 Рік тому

    commented before love the narration

  • @sillyone52062
    @sillyone52062 2 роки тому +1

    I stood within inches of that lone remaining Arado jet while it was at the Garber facility. We were sternly warned not to touch any aircraft (due to the effects of skin oil), but the temptation was great.