They built a detector that has detected anti-helium particles? That by itself seems really hard. But this detector can distinguish isotopes of helium. Wow, that seems even harder to do. And then it has to be small enough and rugged enough to be transported to and work on the ISS? Wow. I am living in a world that I never imagined possible in my youth.
Anton Petrov is always precise, concise and crystal clear in his presentation and makes any complex concept of Physics appear quite easy within seconds, by his appropriate selection of words . I love this quality ! However, my grievance is that his facial expression remains constant and robotic . Speed of presentation is also somewhat above average ! He should practice smiling and other variations of facial expression before mirror every night ! His popularity would explode after this practice !
Thank you Anton. My wish is to wish meet one person who is into this Utube channel, but I have found on one who seems to be aware of the Universe outside of their lives.
This is kinda insane. Confirmation of DM particles, Dark clouds colliding and spewing out antimatter, actual natural antimatter atoms detection simply flying through the universe. I love this. What I didn't quite catch is wether the DM clouds "carry" antimatter particles, or if the collision of DM particles creates antimatter particles.
@@Napoleonic_S it’s not dark matter , it’s antimatter, so opposite electric charge. Look up a positron , should help you understand. Apparently matter and antimatter when they collide annihilate each other. They can create antimatter particles in the large hadron collider but not create an antimatter atom.
@@Napoleonic_S so they are saying that antimatter particles have collected somewhere out there and as random antimatter particles pass through they are colliding and occasionally making an antimatter atom, in this case antimatter helium atom. These people are far too clever for me to question them. That’s my understanding, unless I’m mistaken, and it’s caused by dark matter originally but I don’t think that’s what was claimed
If it clicked like a Geiger counter on each detection, the clicks would blend into audible range frequencies; if the hits are mostly even distributed it would be 1000Hz hiss, but could be a lot hissier and untunned if the distribution isn't all that even.
Anton, When I saw the title I was wondering if you would be taking about Dr. Sam Ting and the AMS on the Space Station and was very happy that was the case. 👍 Not only did Dr. Ting propose the AMS in the ‘90s he also saved it from cancellation after the Columbia accident.
I was lucky enough to hear Dr. Ting speak about the efforts to get the AMS-02 on the last shuttle flight, there's a great documentary about it for free online made by NASA film makers: 'AMS - The Fight for Flight'
Think of it more as "this is roughly the form that this amount of energy has, but as antimatter." Where it's often thought of as single particles, this study found a clumping of antimatter into a cluster this big instead of the usual solitary antiprotons or antineutrons they might find, they found, effectively, Helium isotopes. A Helium amount of energy, but in the mirror-mirror version of itself. Same weight as their matter counterparts, but if they touch they would both release some E=mc2 amounts of energy. Which is part of why people are interested.
@@TevrenEndrigan But would the mirror-mirror large anti-Helium have dark motives and wear an evil curled mustache? What kind of universe allows such dastardly opposites? And what's in store for Lithium, the next in line but never enough? Tune in next week for .... "As The Whirled Turns": Orbital Edition.
Get any anomaly -> Slap "Dark matter" (which doesn't empirically exist) onto it -> Anomaly solved! Do anything in order not to "break physics", i.e. *evidently* incorrect models. Top notch science which we deserve in this era.
Dark Matter does empirically exist though? We can see there's something we don't know pulling on things out there. So we're trying to find other stuff we also don't know that can be correlated with it until we can prove an explanation. That's just how science works.
@@toboterxp8155 No, it doesn't. "Dark matter" is not matter, it's a term describing the mathematical artifacts that have to be introduced in order "not to break physics". What observed is, as you correctly put it, a discrepancy between expected behaviour of objects according to existing models, and actual behaviour of objects. The same goes for "Dark Energy", which isn't any kind of a measurable energy, but a mathematical artifact needed to fit the observations with the current expansion models.
@@palladium1083 Well, we don't know what it is, but that doesn't mean it's not a real thing. We can see it existing, and by now it's pretty solidly proven it is some form of matter, we just have no idea what exactly it's made off. We haven't been able to capture or create its constituents.
@@toboterxp8155 No, I'm sorry, but nothing you write is an actual empirical evidence-based science. We absolutely don't know what it is, there is zero direct evidence, and indirect evidence explanations look more and more contrived to the point where you can substitute "dar matter" with "elves" and it won't change anything; particle physicists just love to present their hypotheses as something solid or even proven (not at all) to funnel more grant money into bigger and more expensive experiments. Pure personal interest. It's not like it's a wrong thing to do in it's principle, i.e. all possibilities deserve investigation, but the truth is, certain part of the physical community just pushes their stuff too much. I can pretty much guarantee you every single experiment conducted will fail to find any dark matter with the same refrain: "This experiment puts another limitation on the energy..." until we hit the physical capabilities limit to conduct any further experiments.
There is another anomaly that should be discussed. Cosmic particles are found to be "robbed" of their electrons (98%). But the majority of particles are being radiated by normal stars like our sun who sends lots of ionised particles. This ionisation is not "robbed" from all electrons. So something changes in due time. My suggestion would be that these ionised particles are being radiated by radiation they cannot process because the electric field they encompass doesn't change this radiation enough to fit the fine line structures of it's electron cloud. The electric field of our earth however does change the speed of radiation in ways that our matter "recognises" radiation as it has originally been produced??????????????
Oh well, Anton! Thanks 4 sharing this info! I think this will be a major mind-blowing discovery of the year! Chunks of anti-matter flying around the space is a thing! Mybe in the future they wil discover that Matter is almost balanced with anti-matter... And while this would pose a major concern for future interstellar navigators, I wonder if it possible to detect anti-matter clouds i space using spectroscopy at distance.
As mentioned in a previous comment, the anti-neutron is composed of anti-quarks and it has a baryon number of -1 compared to +1 for a neutron. Charge is still neutral (zero).
Wait if it's anti helium then if you breathe it in your voice becomes mad deep I'm assuming. As the runaway reaction of anti-matter + matter annihilation happens of course. Since we've discovered more antimatter, I hereby suggest we make the Anti-Standard Model of Physics.
Another hypothesis is that in the early universe, antimatter had a faster rate of lumping which lead to forming black holes resulting in the surplus of matter.
Just to get a little woo woo. If their were anti matter people, they could be your soul mate because when you touched that's all anything in our solar system would be.
I was thinking something similar so what if after the Big Bang matter / anti matter seperated like oil and water? We’re floating on one layer and the anti matter layer is out there floating on the other side of the cosmic microwave background lol
Have the detected particle hits been recorded with the corresponding orientation of the device, with enough precision to map the sky for the various sources of the different kinds of particles?
"Anti-elements" should be identical to normal matter. Same chemistry, same physics, just annihilating normal matter. Of course the lack of anti-matter in the universe is one of the main problems of modern physics and suggests that antimatter is different in some unknown way.
If there are anitmatter nearby to milky way then it must be in the local void nearby us - If the void bubble were made of anihalation or mater and antimatter but there must be pockets of antimatter in there or maybe the galaxy in there is really an antimatter galaxy ( not likely ) but still
Idea for matter / antimatter imbalance.... When the universe was still so hot that matter had a hard time not just turning to energy, matter and antimatter was created in equal amounts (spontaneous matter / antimatter pairs). Most of these particles would be annihilated by collision with an anti-whatever. That release of energy would randomly heat other particles causing matter / matter and antimatter / antimatter collisions, also anihilating particles. So there is balanced creation of matter / antimatter, there is balanced annihilation of matter / antimatter, and there is random annihilation of either. It's that last bit that statistically leads to an imbalance.
How awesome would it be if dark matter is just stable antimatter, and the question to "where did all the antimatter go" and "what is dark matter" both get answered simultaneously.
I was going to be immature and try to describe plasma and dark matter as what happens the day after corned beef and cabbage topped with horseradish sauce.But I decided it didn't matter.
@@BabyMakR its invisible because it doesn't interact electromagnetically like normal matter does... maybe if it had a positron cloud instead of an electron cloud, the remission of photons would behave differently... furthermore, maybe anti-quarks also react differently in regards to the weak nuclear force/strong nuclear force as well in a stable state, and that's why dark matter doesn't interact with normal matter? It's all speculation and just wishful thinking.
I don't know that we can even begin to account for the antimatter in the universe. There could be whole galaxies of mostly antimatter but we wouldn't be able to determine one way or another, with all the visible universe representing areas of uneven annihiliation.
@@terenceblakely4328 Really? I thought gas clouds were pretty rarified, even if they look dense in macro scale. From what I understand not a lot actually "touches" in galactic collisions. Plus there are a lot of unexplained explosions out there too.
If as in the photoelectric effect photons striking metal can produce antimatter positrons, then those positrons may result in the production of photons as they strike another metal plate, something like this may be happening in evacuated photomultiplier tubes.?
I have a question that is only mildly related to your topic here, but I hope you or a commenter can help. We are generally told that any antimatter that comes into any matter will energetically explode. But I have also been told that the quarks and anti-quarks are when self destruct. So, if someone were storing specific antimatter particles , could it be possible to 😊
Ant-helium makes me wonder, is an anti-neutron possible? I.e. it decays into an anti-protron and a positron? Would the decay process revert the charges to normal mater?
Go up in space and video record in X-ray, UV, and any other part of the spectrum we can't see with our naked eyes and show it to the public without any cover ups too. People deserve the right to know just how bizarre our universe really is.
If dark matter annihilates itself into antimatter and matter, which then annihilate into gamma ray, which then are slowly red-shifted into oblivion by the expansion of the universe, could that "explain" dark energy ? With less and less mass into the universe, it should expand faster. Also, what remains is always more concentrated into galaxies, meaning dark matter collisions will increase, until there is not enough dark matter.
Something just occurred to me (pardon my crackpot) but neutrinos are constantly changing their “type” right? Hence some neutrino detectors working better with stellar neutrinos vs fission reaction neutrinos Is it possible this is similar to photons polarization? Perhaps this is part of why they interact so little with regular matter; they only have a chance to interact when they are in certain phases of their polarity. Ok that was more crackpot than i meant to write but that would be a cool thing.
What's leftover from an antimatter explosion? Where does the energy go? What happens if the matter is denser than the antimatter, is anything leftover?
Something I don't understand. I thought when antimatter hit regular matter the two make a giant explosion, so how can the detector record antimatter without blowing up?
According to current speculation, no. Antimatter essentially is “reversed” matter. If dark matter essentially is antimatter regarded in a different manner, there should also be dark antimatter which would essentially be matter regarded in a different manner… but remember that the general scientific consensus says that dark matter doesn’t interact with regular matter, and therefore it shouldn’t interact with antimatter either. However, matter and antimatter react with themselves and with each other but aren’t currently “dark” (undetectable) like dark matter.
I don’t see how gaps detecting more anti He4 proves anything related to dark matter. Dark matter collisions at high speed is strange enough, but those collisions producing anti He4 is even more strange. Anton, am I missing something?
If anti-matter is produced by self-interacting dark matter, and the concentration of dark matter is expected to be denser near the central blackhole, is there any sign there is such anomalous presence of anti-matter near Sag A* or any other known blackhole?
Concerning antimatter i wonder, could we even tell if some of the galaxies we see were entirely composed of antimatter? Maybe that's the explanation for the discrepancy. There is no preference for matter over antimatter, we just happen to live in a chuck of the universe where it dominates.
Very exciting. Q. Could the anti- helium be degenerate anti matter from larger atoms? Anti- matter which has broken down during its journey rather than forming from anti-matter particles.
Somehow six of the coolest words ever had not been put in that order. What a title
On the ISS linked to dark 🤔
@alexpaquette97 obviously it was "anomaly on the linked to fireballs"
@@xelnar Just the use of the word "to" is mindblowing to me
They built a detector that has detected anti-helium particles? That by itself seems really hard. But this detector can distinguish isotopes of helium. Wow, that seems even harder to do. And then it has to be small enough and rugged enough to be transported to and work on the ISS? Wow. I am living in a world that I never imagined possible in my youth.
Thanks for your perseverance Anton! You are a Wonderful Person
❤ from Australia 🇦🇺 I don’t completely understand but love all your teachings! 🙏
I love Australia ❤❤❤ keep on watching ❤ Anton is great . You 'll definitely improve!!!❤❤❤
Dr. Ting should win a second Nobel Prize for this.
This is the most interesting science news I've heard all day.
ALL DAY?!?!?!
@@chairshoe81 All stinkin' day! And probably part of the night.
all decade... if proven
Indeed, I wonder why physicists never talk about Ting and his anti-matter search. This is why I think Anton is the best science report we get.
@@sonarbangla8711 he didn’t publish til now. Of course they haven’t been talking about it.
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. 😎☺️
🎶 Goodness gracious, great thermalized fireballs of Standard Model plasma! 🎶
😂
Lol.
That deserves more than 43 likes surely!
Yes
"Dark Matter Fireballs" the name of my new rock and roll band!
and you only play Ska for your first 7 albums.
Excellent choice Rock on!
Killer name if I ever heard one! 🤘
Deep Purple Fireball 1971 more than 50 years ago
Anton Petrov is always precise, concise and crystal clear in his presentation and makes any complex concept of Physics appear quite easy within seconds, by his appropriate selection of words . I love this quality ! However, my grievance is that his facial expression remains constant and robotic . Speed of presentation is also somewhat above average ! He should practice smiling and other variations of facial expression before mirror every night ! His popularity would explode after this practice !
He doesn't need to change a thing geeks like us will share his videos and will get around.
background image @11:08 looks amazing on my tv. having UA-cam on my tv has definitely upped my viewing enjoyment. 👍 thnx for the excellent content 👍
I hate watching videos on my phone. I have a laptop hooked up to a small TV.
@@tiki_trashmy tv came with a free UA-cam app. Changed my whole tv viewing habits. Watch UA-cam more than any other channel now.
Another wonderful video.
Thank you, sir.
I understood the “this is definitely super exciting” part 😊
Welcome to my club!😂❤❤❤😂
Are Dark Matter Fireballs a 4th of 5th level spell?
9th level.
It can only be added to your spell list if you're a level 18 cosmic sorcerer
Agreed with above. Fireball 5th so dark matter definitely at least 9th.
@@michaelhartzell3392 What edition? I thought fireball was 3rd?
They're a 666th level spell! :O
That s one of the best videos here. Incredible discoveries. The guy deserves another Nobel prize
My problem with antimatter is it's always just so negative...😂😂 Thank you Anton fabulous video as always
Another fantastic video, thank you Anton.
Absolutely fascinating. Well done, Anton
I found a jar of anomaly in the back of my refrigerator. :(
Eat it and you too may create fireballs.
Got me 😂
😂
😂😂😂 I’m sorry! Did you not realize it’s been back there for the last 5 years 😂 JK
dont spread it on your toast itll be ruined 😂
Thank you for your content. My brain can't always follow, but I get so much despite this that I keep coming back.
Thank you Anton. My wish is to wish meet one person who is into this Utube channel, but I have found on one who seems to be aware of the Universe outside of their lives.
Dark Matter Fireballs sounds like something you get the day after eating too many Jalapenos. 🤭
This is kinda insane. Confirmation of DM particles, Dark clouds colliding and spewing out antimatter, actual natural antimatter atoms detection simply flying through the universe. I love this.
What I didn't quite catch is wether the DM clouds "carry" antimatter particles, or if the collision of DM particles creates antimatter particles.
Sounds like the collision, but he was vague saying that end up clumping together. So no idea.
I'm confused, don't they say that DM doesn't directly interact with matter or itself? So what's actually collided?
@@Napoleonic_S it’s not dark matter , it’s antimatter, so opposite electric charge. Look up a positron , should help you understand. Apparently matter and antimatter when they collide annihilate each other. They can create antimatter particles in the large hadron collider but not create an antimatter atom.
@@Napoleonic_S so they are saying that antimatter particles have collected somewhere out there and as random antimatter particles pass through they are colliding and occasionally making an antimatter atom, in this case antimatter helium atom. These people are far too clever for me to question them.
That’s my understanding, unless I’m mistaken, and it’s caused by dark matter originally but I don’t think that’s what was claimed
@@damedusa5107
I'm talking about DM, the supposedly indirect confirmation of DM via M - AM collision that is explained in the video
Dr. Ting was a genius.
Dark matter fireball, sounds like one gnarly Fireball whiskey and Kraken dark rum concoction.
I hope the machine goes "Ting!" When it finds a particle.
1000 times a second. You are right. An absolute necessity. Needs to be hooked up with the ISS intercom. Now
If it clicked like a Geiger counter on each detection, the clicks would blend into audible range frequencies; if the hits are mostly even distributed it would be 1000Hz hiss, but could be a lot hissier and untunned if the distribution isn't all that even.
Anti He-4 is really serious stuff.
Background Graphics look Great, adds to the Amazing Content
This has to be one of the most Sci-Fi titles I've read on UA-cam!
Anton,
When I saw the title I was wondering if you would be taking about Dr. Sam Ting and the AMS on the Space Station and was very happy that was the case. 👍 Not only did Dr. Ting propose the AMS in the ‘90s he also saved it from cancellation after the Columbia accident.
I was lucky enough to hear Dr. Ting speak about the efforts to get the AMS-02 on the last shuttle flight, there's a great documentary about it for free online made by NASA film makers: 'AMS - The Fight for Flight'
Thanks, you're doing an excellent work in science communication. Warm greetings from Mexico.
The terminology has to be updated. An unknown particle being defined as antiparticles being in themselves particles is so convoluting
Think of it more as
"this is roughly the form that this amount of energy has,
but as antimatter."
Where it's often thought of as single particles,
this study found a clumping of antimatter into a cluster this big
instead of the usual solitary antiprotons or antineutrons they might find,
they found, effectively, Helium isotopes.
A Helium amount of energy, but in the mirror-mirror version of itself.
Same weight as their matter counterparts, but if they touch they
would both release some E=mc2 amounts of energy.
Which is part of why people are interested.
I like this reply
No it makes perfect sense because anti doesn’t mean opposite thing or form. Anti particle is still a particle, anti you is still a person.
It's convolutadelic baby!
@@TevrenEndrigan But would the mirror-mirror large anti-Helium have dark motives and wear an evil curled mustache? What kind of universe allows such dastardly opposites? And what's in store for Lithium, the next in line but never enough? Tune in next week for .... "As The Whirled Turns": Orbital Edition.
Fascinating!
Thank you Anton
Cheers Anton. Great Vid.
That is a crazy title
These videos are amazing! The images are almost unbelievable! Thank you for inspiring me to make my own YT channel 💛!
ALL Computer Generated Images (CGI) is UNbelievable ‘reality.’
@@cocoweepahyou sound like you think space isn't real or that the moon is a projection.
@@cocoweepahbet this bro thinks the earth is hollow and full of lizard ppl 😂
@@noahgettheark Your flerfdar is well honed, respect.
That has to be the greatest title ever
It really matters and it doesn't matter!! 😊
Yes, that's what we all thought, obviously.
Very interesting, thank you.
Get any anomaly -> Slap "Dark matter" (which doesn't empirically exist) onto it -> Anomaly solved! Do anything in order not to "break physics", i.e. *evidently* incorrect models. Top notch science which we deserve in this era.
Dark Matter does empirically exist though? We can see there's something we don't know pulling on things out there. So we're trying to find other stuff we also don't know that can be correlated with it until we can prove an explanation. That's just how science works.
@@toboterxp8155 No, it doesn't. "Dark matter" is not matter, it's a term describing the mathematical artifacts that have to be introduced in order "not to break physics". What observed is, as you correctly put it, a discrepancy between expected behaviour of objects according to existing models, and actual behaviour of objects. The same goes for "Dark Energy", which isn't any kind of a measurable energy, but a mathematical artifact needed to fit the observations with the current expansion models.
@@palladium1083 Well, we don't know what it is, but that doesn't mean it's not a real thing. We can see it existing, and by now it's pretty solidly proven it is some form of matter, we just have no idea what exactly it's made off. We haven't been able to capture or create its constituents.
@@toboterxp8155you struck a nerve lol
@@toboterxp8155 No, I'm sorry, but nothing you write is an actual empirical evidence-based science. We absolutely don't know what it is, there is zero direct evidence, and indirect evidence explanations look more and more contrived to the point where you can substitute "dar matter" with "elves" and it won't change anything; particle physicists just love to present their hypotheses as something solid or even proven (not at all) to funnel more grant money into bigger and more expensive experiments. Pure personal interest. It's not like it's a wrong thing to do in it's principle, i.e. all possibilities deserve investigation, but the truth is, certain part of the physical community just pushes their stuff too much. I can pretty much guarantee you every single experiment conducted will fail to find any dark matter with the same refrain: "This experiment puts another limitation on the energy..." until we hit the physical capabilities limit to conduct any further experiments.
There is another anomaly that should be discussed. Cosmic particles are found to be "robbed" of their electrons (98%). But the majority of particles are being radiated by normal stars like our sun who sends lots of ionised particles. This ionisation is not "robbed" from all electrons. So something changes in due time. My suggestion would be that these ionised particles are being radiated by radiation they cannot process because the electric field they encompass doesn't change this radiation enough to fit the fine line structures of it's electron cloud. The electric field of our earth however does change the speed of radiation in ways that our matter "recognises" radiation as it has originally been produced??????????????
Fun stuff! Thank you!
Oh well, Anton! Thanks 4 sharing this info! I think this will be a major mind-blowing discovery of the year! Chunks of anti-matter flying around the space is a thing! Mybe in the future they wil discover that Matter is almost balanced with anti-matter... And while this would pose a major concern for future interstellar navigators, I wonder if it possible to detect anti-matter clouds i space using spectroscopy at distance.
Nice to know about this👍😊
Most excellent.
Thank you so much, Anton, as usual supper interesting and awesome video!
What did you eat for supper that was so interesting? You didn’t say…
6:31 Anti-Neutrons? What’s the opposite of neutral charge?
Made of anti quarks instead of quarks (2 anti-down and 1 anti-up)- still net 0 charge
I'm not positive
There's much more to anti particles than charge...
As mentioned in a previous comment, the anti-neutron is composed of anti-quarks and it has a baryon number of -1 compared to +1 for a neutron. Charge is still neutral (zero).
Anti neutrinos?
I love how they tiptoe around dark matter
This is exactly as awesome as it sounds.
That's one hell of an experimental result.
Is that daylight, I see past yonder heap of GUTS?
Great video thx
There's a definite sense of constructing a hypothesis to fit observations we don't understand here, with no real supporting evidence.
Maybe the best title ever! 💥
Wait if it's anti helium then if you breathe it in your voice becomes mad deep I'm assuming. As the runaway reaction of anti-matter + matter annihilation happens of course.
Since we've discovered more antimatter, I hereby suggest we make the Anti-Standard Model of Physics.
Great, now we have to be worried about antimatter asteroids, thanks Anton.
0:31 Hey, Anton! 😅
Wouldn't it be cool if parts of the universe have overall charge and one part is lumping up anti-matter and we're in a matter portion
…then we shall go to war😂
I think that would lead to many existential crisis. I'd prefer that there not be something 'wonky' with the Universe 😅
Another hypothesis is that in the early universe, antimatter had a faster rate of lumping which lead to forming black holes resulting in the surplus of matter.
Just to get a little woo woo. If their were anti matter people, they could be your soul mate because when you touched that's all anything in our solar system would be.
I was thinking something similar so what if after the Big Bang matter / anti matter seperated like oil and water? We’re floating on one layer and the anti matter layer is out there floating on the other side of the cosmic microwave background lol
Dr Ting!
Officer: what’s this we found in your car??
Me: it’s an anomaly
What is an anti neutron made of?
Same thing as a regular neutron. It just has opposite spin.
Have the detected particle hits been recorded with the corresponding orientation of the device, with enough precision to map the sky for the various sources of the different kinds of particles?
Is there a periodic table of anti elements?
"Anti-elements" should be identical to normal matter. Same chemistry, same physics, just annihilating normal matter.
Of course the lack of anti-matter in the universe is one of the main problems of modern physics and suggests that antimatter is different in some unknown way.
If there are anitmatter nearby to milky way then it must be in the local void nearby us - If the void bubble were made of anihalation or mater and antimatter but there must be pockets of antimatter in there or maybe the galaxy in there is really an antimatter galaxy ( not likely ) but still
Interesting
Idea for matter / antimatter imbalance....
When the universe was still so hot that matter had a hard time not just turning to energy, matter and antimatter was created in equal amounts (spontaneous matter / antimatter pairs). Most of these particles would be annihilated by collision with an anti-whatever. That release of energy would randomly heat other particles causing matter / matter and antimatter / antimatter collisions, also anihilating particles.
So there is balanced creation of matter / antimatter, there is balanced annihilation of matter / antimatter, and there is random annihilation of either.
It's that last bit that statistically leads to an imbalance.
How awesome would it be if dark matter is just stable antimatter, and the question to "where did all the antimatter go" and "what is dark matter" both get answered simultaneously.
I was going to be immature and try to describe plasma and dark matter as what happens the day after corned beef and cabbage topped with horseradish sauce.But I decided it didn't matter.
So how it would remain stable is by staying segregated from regular matter. Because otherwise they would make contact and annihilate.
It would be cool, but dark matter doesn't interact with normal matter except via gravity and is also, for some reason, invisible.
@@BabyMakR its invisible because it doesn't interact electromagnetically like normal matter does... maybe if it had a positron cloud instead of an electron cloud, the remission of photons would behave differently... furthermore, maybe anti-quarks also react differently in regards to the weak nuclear force/strong nuclear force as well in a stable state, and that's why dark matter doesn't interact with normal matter? It's all speculation and just wishful thinking.
Hello Wonderful Anton!!
When you say the fireballs are large, what size scale do you mean? Large in terms of atomic nuclei? asteroids? stars? giant molecular clouds?
If GAPS can comfirm those observations, this could be huge. Haven't been that thrilled about particle physics since a while.
I hate it when antimatter annihilation happens around the house - it's so irritating! Those darned antimatter bundles....
I don't know that we can even begin to account for the antimatter in the universe. There could be whole galaxies of mostly antimatter but we wouldn't be able to determine one way or another, with all the visible universe representing areas of uneven annihiliation.
Since galaxies often collide there should be some spectacular explosions throughout the universe from gas clouds colliding.
@@terenceblakely4328 Really? I thought gas clouds were pretty rarified, even if they look dense in macro scale. From what I understand not a lot actually "touches" in galactic collisions. Plus there are a lot of unexplained explosions out there too.
If as in the photoelectric effect photons striking metal can produce antimatter positrons, then those positrons may result in the production of photons as they strike another metal plate, something like this may be happening in evacuated photomultiplier tubes.?
I have a question that is only mildly related to your topic here, but I hope you or a commenter can help. We are generally told that any antimatter that comes into any matter will energetically explode.
But I have also been told that the quarks and anti-quarks are when self destruct. So, if someone were storing specific antimatter particles , could it be possible to 😊
Ant-helium makes me wonder, is an anti-neutron possible? I.e. it decays into an anti-protron and a positron? Would the decay process revert the charges to normal mater?
Can we find the trajectory of these caught anti-particles to see if they may be coming from the same source? And what was their speed?
Go up in space and video record in X-ray, UV, and any other part of the spectrum we can't see with our naked eyes and show it to the public without any cover ups too. People deserve the right to know just how bizarre our universe really is.
Did they say when they're going to reevaluate the models?
If dark matter annihilates itself into antimatter and matter, which then annihilate into gamma ray, which then are slowly red-shifted into oblivion by the expansion of the universe, could that "explain" dark energy ? With less and less mass into the universe, it should expand faster.
Also, what remains is always more concentrated into galaxies, meaning dark matter collisions will increase, until there is not enough dark matter.
I'm a laymen but this makes sense scientifically based on my limited knowledge.
Not really, space itself is expanding.
Something just occurred to me (pardon my crackpot) but neutrinos are constantly changing their “type” right? Hence some neutrino detectors working better with stellar neutrinos vs fission reaction neutrinos Is it possible this is similar to photons polarization? Perhaps this is part of why they interact so little with regular matter; they only have a chance to interact when they are in certain phases of their polarity. Ok that was more crackpot than i meant to write but that would be a cool thing.
What's leftover from an antimatter explosion? Where does the energy go? What happens if the matter is denser than the antimatter, is anything leftover?
Something I don't understand. I thought when antimatter hit regular matter the two make a giant explosion, so how can the detector record antimatter without blowing up?
dark matter fireballs sounds crazy
Somewhere out there another life form is using a high altitude anti-helium balloon to detect regular helium
and they are posting on Ubuntu the theories of their uneducated masses.
Would anti helium not be destroyed immidiately when entering the atmosphere. Before reaching the balloon?
Black Mesa moment
Scientists are such cool types of people 😊
Anomaly is the scientific way of saying “we don’t understand”.
Just a curios newb question can anti-
matter and dark matter be the same think like being a partial and wave at same time
According to current speculation, no. Antimatter essentially is “reversed” matter. If dark matter essentially is antimatter regarded in a different manner, there should also be dark antimatter which would essentially be matter regarded in a different manner… but remember that the general scientific consensus says that dark matter doesn’t interact with regular matter, and therefore it shouldn’t interact with antimatter either. However, matter and antimatter react with themselves and with each other but aren’t currently “dark” (undetectable) like dark matter.
Has anyone considered, sprites or elves in the upper atmosphere? Electric discharge from lightning?
I don’t see how gaps detecting more anti He4 proves anything related to dark matter. Dark matter collisions at high speed is strange enough, but those collisions producing anti He4 is even more strange. Anton, am I missing something?
If antimatter needs matter to explode energy - then can there be antimatter stars and what would they use to fuel it.?
Sam Ting YES!
I won't lie, I thought i knew his brother: Sum Ting Wong, but apparently they are unrelated.
Wow
I detect probable elegance! 😊
So anti-matter is magnetic.?
antimatter is pretty much just normal matter
@@terraneko8999 yeah, it is as magnetic as normal matter, just in the opposite way
If anti-matter is produced by self-interacting dark matter, and the concentration of dark matter is expected to be denser near the central blackhole, is there any sign there is such anomalous presence of anti-matter near Sag A* or any other known blackhole?
That title sure has cool words in it. How they make sense in that order... Well,, I guess the video expains that ...
Concerning antimatter i wonder, could we even tell if some of the galaxies we see were entirely composed of antimatter? Maybe that's the explanation for the discrepancy. There is no preference for matter over antimatter, we just happen to live in a chuck of the universe where it dominates.
Very exciting.
Q. Could the anti- helium be degenerate anti matter from larger atoms? Anti- matter which has broken down during its journey rather than forming from anti-matter particles.