Thank you, among many other wonderful descriptions in the interview (I will watch it more often), for that Analogy Shawn P. :“ If you see it - you can‘t be it“ !!!
@@TATFoundation I really appreciate Shawn Pethel and Shawn Nevins Videos. And Howdie Mickoski’s (Video) and he was the one who navigated me to the Richard Rose material. Shawn Pethel's contributions and his methaphors have awakened a much deeper understanding in me for the Richard Rose books. His metaphors fit me very well. It linked in so much in me, all the way back to my childhood ..... so that I could connect "loose ends" of childhood intuition or fragments of inner knowledge in a flash. I am really interested in reading or watching more supplementary material from Shawn Pethel.
@@mosano You are in luck because Shawn P was featured in the April 2024 TAT Forum "What I Found: Questions and Answers From a Finder Questionnaire" tatfoundation.org/forum/2024/04/01/2024-april-tat-forum/. You can also find other things he's written by searching his name in the TAT Forum archives here: tatfoundation.org/tat-forum-archives/
@@mosano you're welcome! And if you didn't know, Howdie is part of the panel in this video too: ua-cam.com/video/sRYKwUbHO94/v-deo.htmlsi=v3IbyOHO7BWRSyNR
Just want to clarify that the mind is a manifestation of presence as much as anything else is. It cannot defy presence. Nothing can defy presence. Attention is a manifestation of presence as well. I.
EGO (only a thought) => Automaton (non-duality) => Absolute (our true nature behind the dream) See Consciousness And The Absolute / The Final Talks - Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj - Audiobook
Richard Rose, in his book The Psychology of the Observer, talked about the difference between the feminine and masculine on the path of Jacob's ladder via the vector. That explains a little bit why in public speaking about books and videos and presentations more men do this. We therefore only see more men in the field of authors and speakers, which does not mean that female wisdom is missing there. The lack of female intuition can also quickly lead to the wrong track. This is why women were excluded from "the snake" (see Albigen Papers book cover) for a very long time. However, we also know that masculine and feminine are only separated in duality.
Thank you, among many other wonderful descriptions in the interview (I will watch it more often), for that Analogy Shawn P. :“ If you see it - you can‘t be it“ !!!
glad you could take something from this video! Shawn has a very clear way of communicating.
@@TATFoundation
I really appreciate Shawn Pethel and Shawn Nevins Videos. And Howdie Mickoski’s (Video) and he was the one who navigated me to the Richard Rose material.
Shawn Pethel's contributions and his methaphors have awakened a much deeper understanding in me for the Richard Rose books. His metaphors fit me very well. It linked in so much in me, all the way back to my childhood ..... so that I could connect "loose ends" of childhood intuition or fragments of inner knowledge in a flash.
I am really interested in reading or watching more supplementary material from Shawn Pethel.
@@mosano You are in luck because Shawn P was featured in the April 2024 TAT Forum "What I Found: Questions and Answers From a Finder Questionnaire" tatfoundation.org/forum/2024/04/01/2024-april-tat-forum/.
You can also find other things he's written by searching his name in the TAT Forum archives here: tatfoundation.org/tat-forum-archives/
@@TATFoundation
Thank you 🙏 🤍
@@mosano you're welcome! And if you didn't know, Howdie is part of the panel in this video too: ua-cam.com/video/sRYKwUbHO94/v-deo.htmlsi=v3IbyOHO7BWRSyNR
Nice observation
Just want to clarify that the mind is a manifestation of presence as much as anything else is. It cannot defy presence. Nothing can defy presence. Attention is a manifestation of presence as well. I.
Yes! A new upload from TAP! ❤
TAP or TAT?
EGO (only a thought) => Automaton (non-duality) => Absolute (our true nature behind the dream)
See Consciousness And The Absolute / The Final Talks - Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj - Audiobook
Is this a men’s group?
No! Not exclusive.
Richard Rose, in his book The Psychology of the Observer, talked about the difference between the feminine and masculine on the path of Jacob's ladder via the vector.
That explains a little bit why in public speaking about books and videos and presentations more men do this. We therefore only see more men in the field of authors and speakers, which does not mean that female wisdom is missing there. The lack of female intuition can also quickly lead to the wrong track. This is why women were excluded from "the snake" (see Albigen Papers book cover) for a very long time.
However, we also know that masculine and feminine are only separated in duality.