Thank you very much for your videos. I am glad that besides the classical sources to promote science (such as books and papers), your lectures can also be found on youtube. In my opinion, Prof. Bruton is the best provider of youtube lectures and I don't want to miss any of the lectures.
Excellent explanation! For those interested in LLMs residual connections are also featured in the vanilla transformer block. The idea is similar to CNN ResNets, but instead of gradually adding pixel resolution each block adds semantic "resolution" to the original embedded text input.
Hi Steve - this is Vivek Karmarkar! Thanks for the video - great content as usual and keeps me motivated to create my own PINN content as well. Looking forward to the next video in the series and would love to talk PINN content creation with you! I have been thinking about presenting PINNs with ODEs as examples and its nice to contrast it with Neural ODEs - nomenclature aside, it looks like the power of the NN as universal approximators allows us to model either the flow field (Neural ODEs) or the physical field of interest (PINNs) for analysis which is pretty cool!
Thank you for making this. I watched your video on Neural ODEs before I watched this. It is much easier to understand the Neural ODE video now that I have watched this. I would love to watch a video about the ResNet classifier idea you discuss here. If you have already done that please add a link here. Thanks, and this is awesome!
Many thanks for the extremely good videos. Really well explained and easy to understand. A video on "Augmented neural ODEs" would go well with "neural ODEs" 😊
Vision transformer (ViT) architectures have been studied that outperform CNN-based approaches in some respects, but they require more training data, more resources to train, and in general yield a bulkier model than a CNN would. They also use a different information-concentrating mechanism (attention for transformers vs. convolution for CNNs), so I imagine there are certain vision applications where transformers might be preferable.
tbh understanding his videos is very difficult, IMO he explains badly. Like 14:14 is the first more complicated part and I don't really get what it is about. I wouldn't understand ResNet from his explanation either if I had no prior knowledge about it. He just assumes that I am some expert in math and DLs
SHAMEEEEEE🎉 Bound, border, infinity, noninfinity, natural, where is the end?! calc machine how it works, integer, costs money costs profits cons in mathematics, NOMIA! ECO? algorithm accuracy, fuzzy logic, integer 0-I. ONE BOOK NO INDIVIDUAL HERE 🎉WHEN YOU SMOOTHING GRADIENT YOU LOSING
![Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) [Physics Informed Machine Learning]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/W8PybqAk6Ik/mqdefault.jpg)
![Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) [Physics Informed Machine Learning]](/img/tr.png)
![Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) [Physics Informed Machine Learning]](/img/n.gif)
Thank you very much for your videos. I am glad that besides the classical sources to promote science (such as books and papers), your lectures can also be found on youtube. In my opinion, Prof. Bruton is the best provider of youtube lectures and I don't want to miss any of the lectures.
Excellent explanation! For those interested in LLMs residual connections are also featured in the vanilla transformer block. The idea is similar to CNN ResNets, but instead of gradually adding pixel resolution each block adds semantic "resolution" to the original embedded text input.
Thank you for this content!
Love your approach. Please never stop educating people. We all need teachers like you!:) ps Enjoying reading your book
Hi Steve - this is Vivek Karmarkar! Thanks for the video - great content as usual and keeps me motivated to create my own PINN content as well. Looking forward to the next video in the series and would love to talk PINN content creation with you!
I have been thinking about presenting PINNs with ODEs as examples and its nice to contrast it with Neural ODEs - nomenclature aside, it looks like the power of the NN as universal approximators allows us to model either the flow field (Neural ODEs) or the physical field of interest (PINNs) for analysis which is pretty cool!
Thank you SO MUCH prof. Steve!! I intend to study neural networks in my graduate courses thanks to your lectures!! :D
Thank you for making this. I watched your video on Neural ODEs before I watched this. It is much easier to understand the Neural ODE video now that I have watched this.
I would love to watch a video about the ResNet classifier idea you discuss here. If you have already done that please add a link here.
Thanks, and this is awesome!
Many thanks for the extremely good videos. Really well explained and easy to understand.
A video on "Augmented neural ODEs" would go well with "neural ODEs" 😊
Great tutorial Prof.!
at 16:17 you say you are going to put some links below.. but where are these links?
You have an impressive ability to simplify complex subjects
ResNet is literally the best thing happened in Deep Learning.
Why are Nueral ODEs not more popular? I’ve never heard of them but I see unet and resnet everywhere
Does anyone know if transformers have superseded resnets for image classification?
Vision transformer (ViT) architectures have been studied that outperform CNN-based approaches in some respects, but they require more training data, more resources to train, and in general yield a bulkier model than a CNN would. They also use a different information-concentrating mechanism (attention for transformers vs. convolution for CNNs), so I imagine there are certain vision applications where transformers might be preferable.
thank u sire!
Love from kashmir india❤❤❤
tbh understanding his videos is very difficult, IMO he explains badly. Like 14:14 is the first more complicated part and I don't really get what it is about. I wouldn't understand ResNet from his explanation either if I had no prior knowledge about it. He just assumes that I am some expert in math and DLs
STEVE MAKE TWO. SMALLER HIGHER LIKE ARRAY ONE DIRECTION OR SYMMETRY LIKE MIRROR. FEEDBACK AND THIS 150.000ageSCIENCE.
SHAMEEEEEE🎉 Bound, border, infinity, noninfinity, natural, where is the end?! calc machine how it works, integer, costs money costs profits cons in mathematics, NOMIA! ECO? algorithm accuracy, fuzzy logic, integer 0-I. ONE BOOK NO INDIVIDUAL HERE 🎉WHEN YOU SMOOTHING GRADIENT YOU LOSING
IMHO you should speak a little faster and make less jests; for scientists watching this it wastes a time and attention.
You can always run it at 2x speed....
I am a video editor. If you need any help related to video editing you can contact me. I will share my portfolio