SINATRAA AND A2GUAPO DESTROY RADIANT PLAYERS..
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 гру 2023
- 🎥 TWITCH: / sinatraa
Follow my Socials:
📷 INSTAGRAM: / sinatraa_ow
🐤 TWITTER: / sinatraa
💯 DISCORD: / discord
🎬 TIKTOK / sinatraaval
Blitz helps you track your Headshot% real-time while in-game. Download the Blitz App today: invite.blitz.gg/SinatraaOW
Intro music:
Mesqo & Jewels - Humanity
• Mesqo & Jewels - Human...
Outro music:
We Go by Yakov
www.ebeatzmusic.com/
#Sinatraa #Valorant - Ігри
3:50 the moment my king shows how truly humble under god he is
Lmao
Ah yes, what an amazing ''Overwatch'' gameplay guys
Sinatraa team after winning : GG
Sinatraa : Garbage
jay fills us with big black content just when we need it.
Tf
wdf 😭😭😭
AYOO???????
this guy HAS to be pushing positivity!
Bro he's actually back. There's been rumours that he's been tried out to a team and no wonder he's been playing this insane right now. I really hope the stars are really aligning for his comeback
The fact that he hasnt upgraded his classic has distrubed me deeply.
Which team will humble king to join
Ah yes my favourite Chinese streamer
The goat
YES MY HUMBLE KING HAS RETURNED!!! ❤😊👑
Which team
my fav duo :D
A2HAMBURGER DIED FROM HEART ATTACK FROM EATING TOO MUCH HAMBURGER WE NEED A GOFUNDME
5:43 man I hate this bug so much
what bug
@@koolkid9633 the auto ads
No ur not im here, here
Anyone know his dpi and game sensitivity?
800 .387
FIRST BOYATCH
can we get some gym content again🙏
The break was pleasant and nice but now I must keep the adventure alive goodbye not forever but for now
Ps I gotta catch them all
fr?
Come back to pro play
why are you guys rooting for this man
cuz hes sick? the allegations were false either way lil bro
@@mile.9768 if they were fake then why did blizzard remove the overwatch league patch from the alien zarya skin
also, lil bro?
@@incognitomode178 the ”victim” literally admitted to making it up, blizzard probably didn’t wanna get in any more conteoversy than they are already in
@@incognitomode178
An insecure narcissist with abusive tendencies-that's the primary takeaway from the nine-page document posted by Mrs. Hernandez on March 9, 2021.
Cleo’s document was accompanied by conversations and even audio of alleged abuse she endured during their relationship.
Cleo: “I’m tired.
Jay: “No. More.”
Cleo: “Nuh uh.”
Jay: “I’m close.”
Cleo: “No.”
Jay: “Close!”
Cleo: “No… I don’t wanna.”
Jay: “Stp stp stp st…”
Yeah, that's it. I didn't cut anything; that was a whole thing. This recording is apparently from one of their consensual sex tapes, and it's understood that they continued to have sex after this verbal exchange. Just want to make note of that.
There are also a few other key points: non-consensual insemination, manipulation, and an overwhelming sense of fear. These will all come into play later.
The very next day, Alex Frank Coyce, the global head of competitive operations, would announce the suspension and subsequent investigation into Sinatraa's previous conduct, which, as we all know, spanned a duration of six months before ultimately being declared unresolved. Within the same time frame, Overwatch would issue refunds for the commemorative skin they had released for Sinatraa. A day later, Sinatraa would agree to comply with the investigation and provide the coveted video that Ms. Hernandez had only previously released in audio format.
Something this compelling could have solved the investigation in one night, seeing as how it would either completely vindicate or incriminate Sinatraa. So, of course, I too had to get my hands on this. Sadly, my search remains inconclusive.
The Missing Footage
According to both Mrs. Hernandez and Riot's team, Sinatraa was uncooperative, misconstrued details, and never actually provided the promised footage during the investigation. It's unclear what exactly Sinatraa lied about or misconstrued in this case because everyone has been incredibly vague and no one's answering questions. However, regarding the footage, it should have been obtainable. Miss Hernandez stated, “I would’ve shared the video if it had been requested of me but it wasn’t.” The question arises: why not? Could it be that gaming companies are incompetent and ill-equipped to handle serious accusations like assault and rape? Yes, obviously, the answer is yes-no doubt. But the real problem isn't the video; it's Sinatraa's explanation for not having it.
"I do not have the video audio that she used in her statement. After our relationship ended, she had asked me to delete the video, and I honored that."
Now, keep that in mind as we read Miss Hernandez's statement: "I never once told him to delete the video. I did not care whatsoever if he kept it or not. I thought he still had it, and I told the right investigators that I welcomed him showing the video because in it, you can see his fingers dig into me when I try and move away from him." Well, someone’s lying.
Two Liars
Before the big truth is unraveled, it's crucial to grasp that both parties have already misled. Sinatraa failed to cooperate with Riot or provide the promised video, while Miss Hernandez displayed inconsistencies twice within the first four paragraphs of her earliest document, which I'll clarify now.
Firstly, she states Sinatraa didn't break up with her due to her mental health but because she broke up with him. Yet, in a conversation on page six with one of Sinatraa's friends, she mentions, "I don't know if I could even talk about this with him without him just... I don't know, he already broke up with me once." While earlier she said, “It was not his choice, it was mine.” Devoting an entire paragraph to convey this message, it doesn't align with her apparent worry about something she claimed full control over.
Secondly, after continued post-relationship strife, Miss Hernandez made a TikTok joking about the age of Sinatraa's new girlfriend, Emma, who was 17 at the time while Sinatraa was 19. Cleo said, “It was not intended as malicious whatsoever.” A 19 year old dating a 17 year old isn’t exactly a newsworthy distinction-imagine seeing your ex, with whom you've had conflicts, joking about your relationship with an underage person. Yet, she claims it wasn't intended as malicious. Show of hands-how many would find that TikTok harmless? Not a single one.
From this, we can reasonably conclude a few things. Primarily, Sinatraa hasn't been entirely forthcoming, and Miss Hernandez, as a biased narrator, likely framed the story from a certain perspective. After her second document, I discovered what that lens was.
Document 2
She claimed she deleted it due to incorrectly cropped screenshots, posting it in anger because people celebrated Sinatraa's return to streaming. Anger's always the answer, right? Some segments wouldn't make sense without it, like why, after forgiving Emma completely and wishing her well, she'd suddenly focus on her in the next document, detailing how she scared her into silence with rumors. But hold up, there's more that doesn't line up with Miss Hernandez.
That said, it doesn't mean Frank Sinatra Jr. hasn't been singing a couple of tunes of his own. I've said it before: somebody's lying. If Sinatraa was explicitly asked to delete the video after the breakup, why confidently offer it during the investigation? Did he secretly keep an archive? Did he realize it was incriminating? Did he just screw up? At that point, why not ask Miss Hernandez for the video, especially since she offered? She's had it the whole time.
At the end of the day, who knows why Sinatraa would offer something he clearly doesn't have? People make irrational decisions under extreme pressure, like, I don't know, agreeing to comply with a potentially incriminating investigation by a gaming company.
Contrary to popular belief, I doubt Riot Games' verdict would carry much weight. If Riot Games came out and said he's not guilty, would that change anyone's minds? No, I don't think so. Maybe we'd have more insight if Riot's team elaborated on how he lied and changed details, but for now, it's anyone's guess.
Now, what concerns me more is why people aren't upset with Miss Hernandez for halting an ongoing police investigation while claiming she's not dropping the charges. Let me clear up a common misconception here: victims do not press charges. It's more accurate to say victims pursue charges, as government prosecutors are the ones who press them. Their job is to review reports and ensure the case has merit. But that's not all they consider. Prosecutors also weigh the societal impact of criminal charges if they get it wrong.
Think of the case of Brian Banks, a 17-year-old who lost 10 years due to a fabricated rape allegation. Not the ideal scenario. Secondly, if she's claiming to have dropped the investigation, that means she's no longer cooperating with authorities. It's ironic, considering she emailed Riot to ensure Sinatraa underwent compliance training for investigations or if there wasn't enough evidence for criminal charges. And you can't exactly drop something that doesn't exist.
Dropping the Charges
On September 15th, she revealed to Esports Talk how she ended the investigation because dwelling on it led her to attempt suicide. She mentioned that talking with detectives was more traumatizing than making her personal life available on Twitter and receiving hate and death threats. Hmm, not to mention how, every time it's brought up anywhere with any kind of significance, she actively inserts herself into the conversation. Do people see how some might potentially think she's not being entirely truthful? There's no way detectives and the police are more hateful than Twitter, and she seems to be doing just fine.
There have been plenty of people who have experienced a similar amount of hate over the internet with allegations like this. A majority of the time, they usually appear to have a PTSD response, avoiding social media entirely. On the other end, they keep their posts to a bare minimum while avoiding talking about their controversy entirely. Excuse me for being presumptuous, but her behavior doesn't at all resemble someone who would break down simply discussing it.
Twitter rants make it seem like she's innocent, like she just exaggerated or lied. She said she deleted all her socials, yet she was engaging with journalists, emailing Riot. Hell, she even lost her first Twitter account over telling trolls to kill themselves. That time could have just as easily been focused on a proper investigation because if dwelling were the issue, she's done more than her fair share.
You know what I think? I think putting her phone down and talking with police takes more effort than tweeting, so she's just scapegoating her mental health so no one can criticize her for being lazy. And I'm not saying that because I take her claims lightly. Quite the opposite. If this event has genuinely scarred her and impacted her quality of life, then continuing to post about it on social media will only dilute any real semblance of an investigation or consequence, unless, of course, the consequence she's seeking is from social media itself. In which case, I'd say her problem probably isn't that serious if it can be solved with likes and ratios.
I'm just saying, if it were me and I had that kind of evidence, I'd want to throw the guy behind bars or do something substantial. We've been pretty relentless on Miss Hernandez, but in my honest opinion, after two full months of research, they both sound awful. Sinatraa being an insecure brat, likely from his fame at a young age, and Miss Hernandez embellishing a story about her, not advocating for herself because she has dependency issues and a vendetta. The fact that I know any of this means society has failed us. But in the spirit of fairness, let's review her claims from the top and show what I mean.
@@incognitomode178 Claim 1 (Nonconsensual)
“The first time we ever slept together, I told him I wasn't on birth control, and he could not finish in me. He did it anyway, without my consent.” We have no way of verifying whether this is true or not. Even the fact that she agreed to get an IUD doesn't tell us much. If we take into account that she probably idolized Sinatraa and could have been easily persuaded to do so if it were true, however, it doesn't really change much. But a lack of concern for consent would definitely raise a red flag. As she stated previously, I'm gonna say, all things considered, this claim is highly plausible.
However, before I jump into my next claim, I have a confession to make. When I first looked into this case, I really wanted to prove Sinatraa guilty. I mean, I really did. "The Rise and Fall of Sinatraa" - oh, I can see the thumbnail already, it's beautiful. But as I read more and more of Miss Hernandez's story, these sentences, in particular, kept replaying in my head. And the longer I listened, the less certain I became. "I was depressed, I was scared I would be alone if I wasn't the perfect obedient girlfriend. I reassured him because I didn't want him to get mad at me. But most times in these situations, if it was in person, I would have just surrendered. Eventually, I would rather just say yes and lay there until he was done than fight him on the no."
Claim 2 ("No" is not an option)
This leads us into the second claim: saying no to sex was not an option for me whatsoever. Relationships may be complicated, but I believe we at least have enough to evaluate Miss Hernandez's side. Let's take a look at those three quotes again. “I was depressed... I was scared I would be alone if I wasn’t the perfect, obedient girlfriend.” Here, we can establish her primary fear as being loneliness and her treatment for it as a relationship. This is further supported here: “I stayed with him out of fear of being alone, so my continuing to speak to him after our relationship ended was just a continuation of that fear” (document #1, page 1, paragraph 6), and “I reassured him because I didn’t want him to get mad at me, but most times in these situations, if it was in person, I would have just surrendered” (document #2, page 1, paragraph 5). She was willing to positively reinforce Sinatraa and their sex life if it meant avoiding an argument, a mechanism likely employed to steer clear of her biggest fear, loneliness. In time, her reluctance to firmly refuse Sinatraa's advances would outweigh words entirely, leading us to her conclusion that “saying no to sex was not an option.”
However, this last quote puzzled me the most: "I didn't physically fight him. I wasn't scared of him killing me or anyone I loved. I wasn't unconscious. And that's what legally constitutes rape. I said no countless times, but because I gave in due to the fear of emotional abuse rather than physical abuse, it’s harder to get a conviction." First off, where the hell did you get this legal definition? Rape is simply defined by the Department of Justice as "penetration without the consent of the victim". That's what it boils down to. I'm paraphrasing a little bit, but that's literally all it is. It has nothing to do with killing, fighting, or fearing for your life. I don't know where the hell that came from. Even in this made-up definition that's far more inclusive, Miss Hernandez refuses to classify her experience as rape. So, the fact that people label Sinatraa a rapist is laughable. Unless you have a degree in forensic science and a rape kit that says otherwise, I'd shut up.
Interestingly enough, in this scenario, Miss Hernandez stated that she “gave in due to the fear of emotional abuse.” If "gave in" means giving consent in this context, then obviously you wouldn't have a case because it categorically wouldn't be rape. And unfortunately, regrettable sex with your boyfriend is not a crime. Whatever happened to true justice? Seems like nowadays anyone with a phone and internet is the judge, jury, and executioner.
Claim 3 (Disregard for harm)
“As much as it hurt I learned that he didn't mind hurting me and had no problem leaving me crying in the bathroom while he slept. Sometimes if I said it hurt early on he'd stop, but most of the time it wasn't a big concern for him.” Okay, this one's confusing. He didn't mind hurting her, but sometimes he'd stop if it hurt? Also, I'm unsure what she means by he had no problem leaving her crying in the bathroom if he was asleep. Did he know you were crying, or was he asleep? Again, there's nothing to support this, so it doesn't really matter. I'll revisit the guilt-tripping in the next segment. These events are described as absolutes when part of the description contradicts the certainty of the claim itself. As we've observed earlier, Miss Hernandez isn't exactly giving us the most objective details.
Take this excerpt about Emma, for example: "I had friends let me know if she was posting stuff about me because I tried to ignore it as it was really damaging my mental health." Let's break that down. You were trying to ignore what she was saying by getting your friends to tell you whenever she talked about you, which you then archived. Some of those tweets only have one like on them, like it didn't get much traction. Now, surprisingly enough, psychologists have done studies on this-"actively seeking out and looking at things that damage your mental health, doesn't improve your mental health”. This was first discovered by Kuman Sensei (Common sense) during the Qing Dynasty. “I have a feeling he'll try and say that he was just trying to help me and try to blame all of this on my mental health.” So far, you're the only one that's blamed anything on their mental health-postponing the police investigation, keeping tabs on Emma, and your entire relationship. Is there any part I've missed where you actually have agency as a grown woman and are responsible for the decisions you make? Oh no, because depression forced you into a nine-month relationship with an e-celeb, right? You were depressed, what else were you supposed to do-learn to love yourself? Why do that when you can force someone else to construct your self-image in a parasitic relationship? Did they teach you that one in therapy? I'd ask for my money back if I were you.
Claim 4 (Emotional Conflict)
These texts display Sinatraa keeping tabs on her GPS location to ensure she's not cheating. After an apparent glitch in the system, he accuses her of not actually being at work. You can tell just how immature he is at this point in his life by the fact that he's baby-talking during a serious conversation about infidelity. This behavior is also reminiscent of Miss Hernandez's baby-talking “I don wanna!” and her concrete evidence of assault. Why anyone would question the severity of this case is beyond me. At least at the time of these messages, it's obvious that Sinatraa is controlling and incapable of taking criticism. He flips out on her simply because she tweeted in favor of an opposing team during one of his tournaments. However, keeping tabs on her location and avoiding criticism is something I'd also expect an insecure woman to do. So, in the spirit of equality, I'm gonna let this one slide as normal conflict. I'd push more on the GPS thing, but she was fine with it in her document anyways quote “He used to check my location to see where I was, which was fine”, so this was obviously an arrangement in their relationship.
Claim 5 (Guilt Tripping)
In Mrs. Hernandez's second document, she shows a text where she states, “sometimes I don’t wanna have sex and I just wanna cuddle.” Sinatraa immediately goes on the defensive and assumes that there must be something wrong with him. Miss Hernandez is so afraid to make him upset that she immediately abandons setting the firm boundary here in their relationship to shield his ego by following up with “hey! Baby I do like it don’t be sad no I do like it I like it. Ur the only person I wanna have sex with.” Set the boundary. I want to feel sorry for a supposed “victim” but at the same time, she is saying keep doing what you're doing, “I like it I like it”, in fact.
Conclusion
Miss Hernandez has, according to her video, proof of her being assaulted-something most victims could only hope for in their wildest dreams. And yet, somehow, this case is inconclusive. Is the audience really satisfied with just forcing Sinatraa to go through compliance training for Riot Games? All I've learned over the two months that I've researched this is that she has dependency and mental health issues, and Sinatraa is insecure and persistent.
Not even Miss Hernandez, with her made-up definition, is confident enough to classify this as rape, and yet Sinatraa has already been branded with the label. Her entire focus has been on the emotional abuse or rather manipulation she feels Sinatraa implemented to get his way. This was never conveyed to Sinatraa, which led to a perpetual cycle throughout their relationship. Sinatraa is at fault for not being more considerate, and Miss Hernandez for never properly communicating her concerns.
Does this mean what happened was okay? No. What this does mean is that both of them were unprepared for a serious relationship, and their personal issues led to a toxic environment for each other. If one wants to call regrettable sex assault, then sure, go ahead, I can't stop them. But the likelihood that an actual crime was perpetrated here is very slim. Of course, I could be proven wrong, and Miss Hernandez's video she apparently has of Sinatraa assaulting her could be irrefutable evidence.
7:29 holy shit
Top 10 most insecure valorant players of all time😂😂
I know you see this comment too lmao, your insecurities show and it’s comedy
bro is talking to a billionaire like this lmao, he'll buy your parents bank and reposes your house lil bro@@CUSOCOOL
tf
first
Youre so insecure😂😂
dead boring game go back to overwatch and make 10k a year or get a haircut whichever is easier
LOL overwatch is DEAD not valorant.
@@mile.9768 both dead like this guys career
@@kickrocks4766 “I was depressed... I was scared I would be alone if I wasn’t the perfect, obedient girlfriend.” Here, we can establish her primary fear as being loneliness and her treatment for it as a relationship. This is further supported here: “I stayed with him out of fear of being alone, so my continuing to speak to him after our relationship ended was just a continuation of that fear” (document #1, page 1, paragraph 6), and “I reassured him because I didn’t want him to get mad at me, but most times in these situations, if it was in person, I would have just surrendered” (document #2, page 1, paragraph 5). She was willing to positively reinforce Sinatraa and their sex life if it meant avoiding an argument, a mechanism likely employed to steer clear of her biggest fear, loneliness. In time, her reluctance to firmly refuse Sinatraa's advances would outweigh words entirely, leading us to her conclusion that “saying no to sex was not an option.”
However, this last quote puzzled me the most: "I didn't physically fight him. I wasn't scared of him killing me or anyone I loved. I wasn't unconscious. And that's what legally constitutes rape. I said no countless times, but because I gave in due to the fear of emotional abuse rather than physical abuse, it’s harder to get a conviction." First off, where the hell did she get this legal definition? Rape is simply defined by the Department of Justice as "penetration without the consent of the victim". That's what it boils down to. I'm paraphrasing a little bit, but that's literally all it is. It has nothing to do with killing, fighting, or fearing for your life. I don't know where the hell that came from. Even in this made-up definition that's far more inclusive, Miss Hernandez refuses to classify her experience as rape. So, the fact that people label Sinatraa a rapist is laughable. Unless you have a degree in forensic science and a rape kit that says otherwise, I'd shut up.
Interestingly enough, in this scenario, Miss Hernandez stated that she “gave in due to the fear of emotional abuse.” If "gave in" means giving consent in this context, then obviously she wouldn't have a case because it categorically wouldn't be rape. And unfortunately, regrettable sex with your boyfriend is not a crime.