I am also a real estate photographer of 3 years, I also used to bracket shots now I just use a Sony a7riii the dynamic range is incredible with raw, one photo hand held with a backwards facing flash and by pulling down the highlights in Lightroom I can create what looks like a bracket shot without all the extra time and effort!
Bruh if you're shooting a static scene with a tripod you should be using base iso of 100 or 50 depending on your camera. Higher iso introduces noise and distorts color.
Pretty cool that this is now a thing in photography that everyone is talking about. Been doing this for about 10 years now. Thought everyone in photography knew about this.
trying to be smart except they're clearly using a tripod, locking aperture allows him to ensure he has the correct amount of sharpness and depth of field in his shot, which is why he says to put it at 9.0, the ISO should remain low since you don't want any noise, and from there, since he's using shutter speed on a static shot, he can set it to whatever he wants and it'll have no effect. It's why he says how to get decent real estate shots, this will work for most places with a tripod.
@@LzysGraphics It's just so random that is has to be f9 and ISO 250. Could easily be f11 and ISO 100 so why does he tell us to choose exactly these settings
@@LzysGraphics 1. im a designer/ photographer and im aware of all what you said. i do it nearly every day at my job. 2. aperture of 9.0 is not the best for sharpness for everyone. it depends on the lens. if you have a lens with a max aperture of 1.4f, you will have a much lower sweet spot. 3. you forgot, that there are fullframe and apsc cameras. if you put both cameras in the exact same position in the same room and the same time, you will have differences in depth of field. you need to consider the lens and focal lenght. 4. "the ISO should remain low since you don't want any noise..." yes. but why is he saying 250 and not put it very low? thats my point. its too specific to be true for everyone. in fact, if hes using a tripod, the ISO should be 80-100 then, since he can choose what ever shutterspeed he wants, to make it brighter. also you can see in his pictures, he is also capturing the outside. if your backyard is no desert and has moving trees or whatever, because of wind for example, you cant take an aperture of what ever you want, since the trees will be unsharp then. 5. "this will work for most places with a tripod." no it will not. he doesnt say at which time of the day you should shoot for example. and at this time of the year, the sky is cloudy with nearly no sun. its darker. and if your room isnt completely white, like this one, everything changes again. 5. even IF he would help most people with this, why not helping everyong by not going too specific and shortly explain why to use certain settings, so that everyone can adjust it to their own specific scenario.
@@suizidschlumpf2 1. Who cares? You’re not as good as you think you are. 2. True, however, someone that “does this every day” should know that regardless of the lens F8-F11 will always be its sharpest range. 3. DOF is rarely important in real estate photography. 4. Correct 5. Not true.. most cameras in the last 10 years or newer have the dynamic range to cover that 5…again. Learn to count.
@@harveymanfrantinsingin7373 1. well, you should care and check your "facts" that you present here. 2. what now? is it "true" or not? my point was, that your sharpest point depends on the lens you have. F8-F11 is NOT allways the sharpest range!! this "rule of thumb" is outdated. lenses can have much wider apertures than F3.5 nowadays. for example, if you have a 50mm F1.4 lens, then its sweet spot is F2-F4. the rule of thumb for nearly every lens is 2-3 F stops down from your widest aperture. 3. well, he brought it up. but id say its kinda important since you dont allways want to have everything you can see outside in focus. 5. good luck with an aperture of F9 and the rest of his settings. especially when you have a mostly black/ dark grey interior. or maybe at night, for more moody shots. if its too dark, its blacked out. no dynamic range on this planet will safe you then. 5. again. shame on me.
Tilt-shift lens, mirror lock-up (or mirrorless), f/8 or 11 with focus stacking, time-delay shutter or remote release, strobes with remote slave trigger for fill-light when/where necessary, reflectors, circular polarizer when/where necessary, white balance card, handheld incident meter with averaging feature, access to property at ideal time of day - these are all things that I observed pros using when I was assisting with interior photography for a fine homes magazine. Now-a-days, with the software and features available, you can get away with a lot less. Also, this isn't one-size-fits-all, some photogs were still using medium format cameras with normal focal lengths and hot-lights; some just used available light and would get creative with their staging to make it work.
As realtor many clients see the HDR photos in the listing but on showing the the home the HDR photos in the listing do not repressent what they they are actually looking at andsome of them respond as though the listing photos were deceptive.
Every modern DSLR and mirrorless camera offers an integrated HDR merging option. I never used it but I guess the JPEG file will look pretty good to gain some time. Also, with 1 single raw file it’s possible to process 2 or 3 differently processed jpeg files and merge them afterwards.
😂 bracketing...HDR...lens kit ...ISO...I learned something from an old photographer ( master) : " you have a good camera ,well then take a shoot that don't need anymore adjustings, postprocessing...that's when you are a photographer " ...get back to film cameras ...that's art 🎨...nowadays it's about how beautiful a digital shit can be 😂
Biggest petpeeve with short form content is a split second reveal. You spent the whole video explaining how to do it but only 1 second showing the final product
Great insight thank you ❤ I can't determine whether it's better taking 3 shots and blending in photoshopped or just use the built in HDR menu option on the mirrorless camera?
@@davidroberts5535 I use external flash too. ISO 320 is not noticeable, full frame cameras are better at a higher iso compared to iso 100. However, to each their own
Andrew, There are many ways to take interior photos. Yours is one way and it makes sense but I have seen many other ways of taking interior photos as I have been photographing many genres for the past 53 years. Your way is fast and simple and gets you the desired result but in a poorly lit room your method is not possible. Flambient is one way along with many other techniques. Here is a photographer that does: www.youtube.com/@NathanCoolPhoto/videos
This is more like a cheatsheet method. Start with these settings and adjust. Nothing about this is simple. At F9 wouldnt he just be take pictures of walls that are in focus?
@@jeffxd5029 First reason is that many Canon cameras perform well at iso 400 (with great colors). Second, even though I could get a good exposure at iso 100, having a higher iso allows me to have a slightly faster shutter speed and less chance for motion blur. The difference in noise is none on modern sensors so you lose nothing in terms of noise performance with a higher shutter speed and gain a sharper image while avoiding potential motion blur. I’ve done work for 3 real estate photo companies and iso 400 for my base image was always the recommendation. Do what works for you though.
Why ISO 250 on a tripod? Need a quicker shutter speed for all the movement in that frame? Also f9 is great but what if you want a little more DOF and shoot at f11 or f13?
Do you have your own editors or, when you say that your photographers don't mess with editing, do you outsource to a service that you have contracted or do you just have a couple people who's sole job is to edit your photographers jobs? Thanks
This is such a bad tutorial from a supposed "photographer" lmao. No mention of the lens (in turn, why you choose f9), image file and why you're shooting at anything above ISO100. It's missing basic information for beginners but it also doesn't teach anything to experienced photographers
I mean, I think any experienced photographer would understand why to everything you just mentioned. Lens, doesn't matter, I'm assuming wider the better but as long as the lens fits the space in the room. F9 to keep everything on focus. Wider apertures means less in focus. F7.1 and above makes it sharper to an extent. F9 is a great spot. Image file obviously RAW. And anything ISO like, 1600 or under depending on camera you're still getting little to no Noise. Duh
First and foremost, one must have a 28 or 35mm focal length. Keep iso low, 500 or less, it doesn't matter a whole lot. Aperture F 8-12. Bring flash if you have it. It will save you some time, because you can get the correct exposure in one shot.
28 or 35? No... 24mm or wider is going to be good for cramped interiors. You can shoot with a 17mm and correct distortion in post. I know Canon makes a TS 35mm, but you can also adapt other, wider lenses with a TS adapter and then get in-camera perspective control with a wider focal length. I don't think 35mm is very practical for most interiors unless you are stitching.
Why would you have your iso at 250? You went to realistically be at iso 100 or base iso. Personally I set iso 100 fstop 7.1 and then adjust my shutter speed. 3 to 5 shots and were done.
The photographer trying to make a living out of real estate photography. Not break the bank and still have poor distortions and cropped images. Sure, 100mp looks cool but still bent lines. Lol
This is way too general, it always depends on the room you are in, the amount of light you have access to, and the camera you are using. For example for a higher megapixel camera, you always want the lowest ISO possible as to create the cleanest look possible with no noise present.
It's not to general, he's clearly specified this works for most real estate shots, no one's going to be shooting their real estate photos in zero lighting, meaning you're likely to be okay on 250 ISO, the aperture remains the same since it's a static scene with no moving objects meaning he can use his shutter speed to adjust exposure, that way he can ensure a good depth of field and good sharpness throughout.
…said the guy who knew too little, yet still commented! Until cameras have a dynamic range of roughly 30, In that scene, there is no “correctly exposed” shot… ya dummy.
Use flash instead...like everyone else. Then do an HDR shot if it works with the lighting. Not sure why you're trying not to tell people your shooting HDR. what was your point on hiding that? Also ISO 250...why?
Look up auto bracketing and bracketing in photography. I got a random 16 year old entry level dslr (canon rebel xti) and even that had an auto bracketing function, i just had to set it to continuous shooting and hold the shutter for three shots
@@DMTStokes I dont need two minutes..... THEY cant figure out what the face, candle, electricity, or the big M with shading means....... you think that reading a manual will teach them. HAHAHAHHAAHA...
Better settings would be ISO 100…. 250 is a bit much for indoors especially with a tripod.. F/11 to 16. Everything will be in focus and no blurry edges rather than at f/9. Real estate photography you’re mostly just trying to expose the outside, also shoot in aperture priority because your F stops are going to change with different exposures in manual mode, and it will be difficult for them to blend in post.
F7.1 is all you need (using a wide angle, everything is in focus unless you’re outside shooting mountains and foreground). Iso 100 isn’t used because it increases shutter time. Higher iso plus wider aperture decreases the time even more. Also, what camera are you using where your aperture is changing in manual mode?
@@Gr33n1872 Very Interesting. Sure F/7.1 can be used, any f stop could work when you shoot with a wide angle above f5.6. Anything below that is not the best idea but also depends on your lens glass. When you use ( AP )Aperture Priority Mode you can select your aperture and the camera will automatically set the shutter speed for all 3 bracketed shots , which will all be on the same F stop you choose. ISO 100 is also best for one less grain when post processing and blending all image’s together will always cause some grainy images. You’re using a tripod , not shooting hand held lol. Why would it matter how long the shutter speeds are ? Unless u have moving clouds outside the window or objects then yes crank up that ISO… shooting In Manual mode . The F stop changes with every bracket you take. I’ve started out in HDR photography about 9 years ago at its Popularity. I Don’t do much of it anymore but I will do brackets to get the full Dynamic range when taking landscapes . I started out with a crop Sensor Canon 60D . Now I’m using Sony A7R3 . And would never go back lol.
![Exposing My Real Estate Photography Workflow 🤯 [So you can copy it]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/J0X0k09R2rY/mqdefault.jpg)
![Exposing My Real Estate Photography Workflow 🤯 [So you can copy it]](/img/tr.png)
![20 Real Estate Photography Hacks To Turn a Beginner into a PRO! [You need this]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/N9m9otnHMuk/mqdefault.jpg)
![How To Shoot Amazing Real Estate Photos Without Using Flash [FULL WORKFLOW]](/img/n.gif)
Every place and camera will have different settings....
Adapt to it then
That's why he said shutter speed will adjust the brightness...
F9 is for having everything in focus and iso can be adjusted as well.
You don't get this is a scam.
I do this same thing for real estate photography. Exposure bracketing is amazing!
if you are using tripod, shutterspeed will be the only difference with his settings.
Almost importantly... The ISO 250 😂
You should shoot in the native ISO for your camera.
That is basic Iso without noise reduction
Exactly. There is no reason here to shoot with anything other ISO 100 while using a tripod. Makes no sense.
It makes for a faster shutter speed, therefore, speeding up your workflow
@@jeremybeal23 losing picture quality to save literally a fraction of a second on the shutter? Please…
I am also a real estate photographer of 3 years, I also used to bracket shots now I just use a Sony a7riii the dynamic range is incredible with raw, one photo hand held with a backwards facing flash and by pulling down the highlights in Lightroom I can create what looks like a bracket shot without all the extra time and effort!
That’s just called HDR
Duh. He's just educating people who isn't aware, in simple terms.
Bruh if you're shooting a static scene with a tripod you should be using base iso of 100 or 50 depending on your camera. Higher iso introduces noise and distorts color.
That being said. Exposure bracketing is definitely the right way to do this and the results do look good.
@Realist not everyone has a newer camera. People who need these videos to learn likely have shit camera bodies
@Realist generally yeah but there's also no reason to use it either.
You should always be at native ISO, not just low.
Whatever the cameras native iso is probably what is the ideal setting.
Besides if it’s a new camera 250 isn’t going to hurt.
Pretty cool that this is now a thing in photography that everyone is talking about. Been doing this for about 10 years now. Thought everyone in photography knew about this.
y, definetly allways use ISO 250 and aperture 9.0, since every room is the same at every time in any place.
no comments on focal lenght etc.
trying to be smart except they're clearly using a tripod, locking aperture allows him to ensure he has the correct amount of sharpness and depth of field in his shot, which is why he says to put it at 9.0, the ISO should remain low since you don't want any noise, and from there, since he's using shutter speed on a static shot, he can set it to whatever he wants and it'll have no effect. It's why he says how to get decent real estate shots, this will work for most places with a tripod.
@@LzysGraphics It's just so random that is has to be f9 and ISO 250. Could easily be f11 and ISO 100 so why does he tell us to choose exactly these settings
@@LzysGraphics
1. im a designer/ photographer and im aware of all what you said. i do it nearly every day at my job.
2. aperture of 9.0 is not the best for sharpness for everyone. it depends on the lens. if you have a lens with a max aperture of 1.4f, you will have a much lower sweet spot.
3. you forgot, that there are fullframe and apsc cameras. if you put both cameras in the exact same position in the same room and the same time, you will have differences in depth of field. you need to consider the lens and focal lenght.
4. "the ISO should remain low since you don't want any noise..."
yes. but why is he saying 250 and not put it very low? thats my point. its too specific to be true for everyone.
in fact, if hes using a tripod, the ISO should be 80-100 then, since he can choose what ever shutterspeed he wants, to make it brighter.
also you can see in his pictures, he is also capturing the outside. if your backyard is no desert and has moving trees or whatever, because of wind for example, you cant take an aperture of what ever you want, since the trees will be unsharp then.
5. "this will work for most places with a tripod."
no it will not.
he doesnt say at which time of the day you should shoot for example. and at this time of the year, the sky is cloudy with nearly no sun. its darker.
and if your room isnt completely white, like this one, everything changes again.
5. even IF he would help most people with this, why not helping everyong by not going too specific and shortly explain why to use certain settings, so that everyone can adjust it to their own specific scenario.
@@suizidschlumpf2
1. Who cares? You’re not as good as you think you are.
2. True, however, someone that “does this every day” should know that regardless of the lens F8-F11 will always be its sharpest range.
3. DOF is rarely important in real estate photography.
4. Correct
5. Not true.. most cameras in the last 10 years or newer have the dynamic range to cover that
5…again. Learn to count.
@@harveymanfrantinsingin7373
1. well, you should care and check your "facts" that you present here.
2. what now? is it "true" or not?
my point was, that your sharpest point depends on the lens you have. F8-F11 is NOT allways the sharpest range!!
this "rule of thumb" is outdated. lenses can have much wider apertures than F3.5 nowadays.
for example, if you have a 50mm F1.4 lens, then its sweet spot is F2-F4. the rule of thumb for nearly every lens is 2-3 F stops down from your widest aperture.
3. well, he brought it up.
but id say its kinda important since you dont allways want to have everything you can see outside in focus.
5. good luck with an aperture of F9 and the rest of his settings. especially when you have a mostly black/ dark grey interior.
or maybe at night, for more moody shots.
if its too dark, its blacked out. no dynamic range on this planet will safe you then.
5. again. shame on me.
so beautiful and easy to understanding 👏👏👏👏👍
Tilt-shift lens, mirror lock-up (or mirrorless), f/8 or 11 with focus stacking, time-delay shutter or remote release, strobes with remote slave trigger for fill-light when/where necessary, reflectors, circular polarizer when/where necessary, white balance card, handheld incident meter with averaging feature, access to property at ideal time of day - these are all things that I observed pros using when I was assisting with interior photography for a fine homes magazine. Now-a-days, with the software and features available, you can get away with a lot less. Also, this isn't one-size-fits-all, some photogs were still using medium format cameras with normal focal lengths and hot-lights; some just used available light and would get creative with their staging to make it work.
the only thing to learn here is the bracketing part. others depends on the kind of camera you are using
Gotta bracket and merge those photos, makes all the difference
Its called HDR High Dynamic Range pictures, i use it alot in nature!
As realtor many clients see the HDR photos in the listing but on showing the the home the HDR photos in the listing do not repressent what they they are actually looking at andsome of them respond as though the listing photos were deceptive.
Any toturial about editing those in Photoshop
You forgot to mention the focal range on the lens
Every modern DSLR and mirrorless camera offers an integrated HDR merging option. I never used it but I guess the JPEG file will look pretty good to gain some time. Also, with 1 single raw file it’s possible to process 2 or 3 differently processed jpeg files and merge them afterwards.
😂 bracketing...HDR...lens kit ...ISO...I learned something from an old photographer ( master) : " you have a good camera ,well then take a shoot that don't need anymore adjustings, postprocessing...that's when you are a photographer " ...get back to film cameras ...that's art 🎨...nowadays it's about how beautiful a digital shit can be 😂
Why would you use iso 250 if you've committed to using a 2 second timer and a tripod lol
Biggest petpeeve with short form content is a split second reveal. You spent the whole video explaining how to do it but only 1 second showing the final product
I hear ya; I paused the video and saw the final product.
you have a Canon 6d, there's a shooting mode that can take all 3 pics and blend it for you into one picture right away
Yeah and that mode sticks compared to manually editing
@@Valencia_Media it might but it's definitely more convenient if you don't want to manually edit or if you don't have the software to do so
@@zzaynr if you get to be paid for photos, you should always manually edit.
Great insight thank you ❤ I can't determine whether it's better taking 3 shots and blending in photoshopped or just use the built in HDR menu option on the mirrorless camera?
Yep, I did that with my first digital camera 20 years ago...
Why shoot at ISO250 when you’re working on a tripod? Just shoot base ISO for best noice performance
most important thing: editing…
I generally use iso 320 f/6.3 and bracket the shots with 7 frames. I find it gives a more natural look. I use the canon 6Dmk2 with 16-35 f/4 L
16-35mm f4 is a joy to use.
7 frames? ISO 320? Wut???
@@davidroberts5535 I use external flash too. ISO 320 is not noticeable, full frame cameras are better at a higher iso compared to iso 100. However, to each their own
Why not the lowest iso since you are using a tripod?
Arbitrarily always use ISO 250... not base ISO... not for any reason... 250 is the answer because it smells better that way. Lol.
Most cameras now have that function already built in to them it’s called HDR
Do you set the ss at 1/30...and camera will change it while shooting the 3 images?
This is a really good question.
Shooting real estate inside at 24mm making you millions?
Damn bro imagine how much you can get doing it the right way?
That iso sounds kind of arbitrary
HDR in manual....lol There are cameras capable of capturing image in an HDR color depth.
It seems to work but I I got a little twinge of doubt when the opening footage was so blown out
bracketing moment to hdr
Just…use….aperture priority. Why shoot manual and adjust shutter if it’s the same thing with extra work?
You can use pixel 7... So easy
Andrew,
There are many ways to take interior photos. Yours is one way and it makes sense but I have seen many other ways of taking interior photos as I have been photographing many genres for the past 53 years. Your way is fast and simple and gets you the desired result but in a poorly lit room your method is not possible. Flambient is one way along with many other techniques. Here is a photographer that does: www.youtube.com/@NathanCoolPhoto/videos
This is imo the easy part. The editing part I find more challenging. How do you go about that?
How to blend the photos?
This is more like a cheatsheet method. Start with these settings and adjust. Nothing about this is simple.
At F9 wouldnt he just be take pictures of walls that are in focus?
@@SS77S7 Why wouldnt he focus on the middle of the room and adjust to have most of the room in focus?
Very nice
Amazing
Do I put the exposure in the middle before I take the shot?
I shoot at ISO 400, f/8 and adjust shutter speed. But we have similar settings.
If you're using a tripod then just shoot with base ISO lol
i have a question, im new so.. why do use increase iso instead of lowering the shutter speed on a landscape?
@@jeffxd5029 First reason is that many Canon cameras perform well at iso 400 (with great colors). Second, even though I could get a good exposure at iso 100, having a higher iso allows me to have a slightly faster shutter speed and less chance for motion blur. The difference in noise is none on modern sensors so you lose nothing in terms of noise performance with a higher shutter speed and gain a sharper image while avoiding potential motion blur.
I’ve done work for 3 real estate photo companies and iso 400 for my base image was always the recommendation. Do what works for you though.
@@justesmond use a tripod all your issues are fixed 😂
Where can I find out how to set up bracketing 😊
Ok so HDR nice
He's using a 15 year old camera. He's teaching 90 year Olds how to use their pawnshop camera
what camera and lens are you using?
Why ISO 250 on a tripod? Need a quicker shutter speed for all the movement in that frame? Also f9 is great but what if you want a little more DOF and shoot at f11 or f13?
Do you have your own editors or, when you say that your photographers don't mess with editing, do you outsource to a service that you have contracted or do you just have a couple people who's sole job is to edit your photographers jobs? Thanks
how to combine all the 3 photos together ?
HDR?
Your using the wrong lens for shooting in door.
That's a 16-35. It's exactly what I would use.
F9.0 how about diffraction limit of r5 sensor ?
Since you use photoshop, why 3 exposures? 🤔 Lightroom is for editing, photoshop is for manipulation.
For bracketing to get everything properly exposed in the final image.
@@KoolCreation lightroom again? 🤔
@@bamsemh1 Either one works
Would you like to show how to edit these 3 photos in Photoshop? 🙏🙏🙏🙏
How do you edit these in photoshop?
If you have tripod, you can obviously shoot at lowest possible iso 🐣 (what are those troll settings)
Plus you can bracket 5+ photos, for even more dynamic range, but beware of clouds in your shot as they could move.
I'm assuming 250 is just his cameras native iso. Plus you already answered your own question as to why he doesn't merge more pictures
What lens is that?
This is such a bad tutorial from a supposed "photographer" lmao. No mention of the lens (in turn, why you choose f9), image file and why you're shooting at anything above ISO100.
It's missing basic information for beginners but it also doesn't teach anything to experienced photographers
I mean, I think any experienced photographer would understand why to everything you just mentioned.
Lens, doesn't matter, I'm assuming wider the better but as long as the lens fits the space in the room.
F9 to keep everything on focus. Wider apertures means less in focus. F7.1 and above makes it sharper to an extent. F9 is a great spot.
Image file obviously RAW.
And anything ISO like, 1600 or under depending on camera you're still getting little to no Noise. Duh
In this video it's just about the manual settings.
My friend this is a less than a minute long UA-cam short, can’t fit it all 😅
Do you think your settings will work in all light ambience????
First and foremost, one must have a 28 or 35mm focal length. Keep iso low, 500 or less, it doesn't matter a whole lot. Aperture F 8-12.
Bring flash if you have it. It will save you some time, because you can get the correct exposure in one shot.
Don’t need to correct exposure for hdr photos dude… kinda why you bracket
If I had a house like this and you used flash and single shot, you'd be out on your ass.
28 or 35? No... 24mm or wider is going to be good for cramped interiors. You can shoot with a 17mm and correct distortion in post. I know Canon makes a TS 35mm, but you can also adapt other, wider lenses with a TS adapter and then get in-camera perspective control with a wider focal length. I don't think 35mm is very practical for most interiors unless you are stitching.
yes but for this need wide angle lens...
Why not use base iso or the iso that your specific camera has the greatest dynamic range?
Wow❤
Now we know where crappy real estate photos come from.
Lol
Why would you have your iso at 250? You went to realistically be at iso 100 or base iso.
Personally I set iso 100 fstop 7.1 and then adjust my shutter speed. 3 to 5 shots and were done.
Tilt-Shift lens has entered the chat.
Am I a joke to you?
With Hasselblad one does not have to worry about tilt shift😀
The photographer trying to make a living out of real estate photography. Not break the bank and still have poor distortions and cropped images. Sure, 100mp looks cool but still bent lines. Lol
What happens when you have a poorly lit room that does not have windows similar to your demo?😊
You can use a flash! Check out Nathan Cool. Him and Eli have similar methods
My iPhone can do just that in one click
why not put ISO in auto????
basically an HDR...
Ahh yes HDR
yes
But how do you blend them ?
Photoshop
why use 250 iso?
Lose the background music
Fr
Hello sir I am thilip real estate photo editor from India and my work is a real estate photo editor
Is that a 5dmk4
Joshua tree
Annoying music...
Totally agree with ya
Thank you!
If you need any service?
This is way too general, it always depends on the room you are in, the amount of light you have access to, and the camera you are using. For example for a higher megapixel camera, you always want the lowest ISO possible as to create the cleanest look possible with no noise present.
It's not to general, he's clearly specified this works for most real estate shots, no one's going to be shooting their real estate photos in zero lighting, meaning you're likely to be okay on 250 ISO, the aperture remains the same since it's a static scene with no moving objects meaning he can use his shutter speed to adjust exposure, that way he can ensure a good depth of field and good sharpness throughout.
The background music is very distracting and annoying
Or you just take one correctly exposed photo and spend half the time only in Lightroom..
…said the guy who knew too little, yet still commented!
Until cameras have a dynamic range of roughly 30, In that scene, there is no “correctly exposed” shot… ya dummy.
How do you do it on A7III
You’re not serious… right?
@@DMTStokes Wow what à Nice answer
@@idrisstdj sony should have a dedicated “bracketing” menu you can map to a custom button
Millions? Is there really that much money in real estate photography? 🤔
Alternative is to use iphone and post 🙃🙃🙃
And why manual?
Your iso, shutter, and f-stop are what get adjusted if you're not in manual.
You want to keep full control of those when bracketing photos.
Lmaoooo
or, just shoot in HDR mode for exact same results without photoshop.
You don’t know what’s on that train.
Use flash instead...like everyone else. Then do an HDR shot if it works with the lighting. Not sure why you're trying not to tell people your shooting HDR. what was your point on hiding that? Also ISO 250...why?
Millions in revenue 😂
?
How do you blend those pics
+1, how?
Select the photos in Lightroom. Right click. Merge photos.
So you fix 3 second timer to take 3 photos? 😂 Wer did u get that camera from? 😝
Look up auto bracketing and bracketing in photography. I got a random 16 year old entry level dslr (canon rebel xti) and even that had an auto bracketing function, i just had to set it to continuous shooting and hold the shutter for three shots
That annoying music always throw me off
😂
My Google pixel 6 phone takes better pictures.
Or set up your camera properly and take one photo and be done. Remember always shoot saw people. Then you can adjust the colors accordingly.
If he gets the interior properly exposed. Wouldn’t the highlights on the exterior be blown out?
@@KoolCreation my brother actually explained it to me how he does it being in the same industry. It's very technical.
@@xr3217 Oh ok yeah everyone has their own method. For me bracketing is faster and I can get the images to the client fast.
@@KoolCreation I'm glad it's working for you. Do you have any videos on recording the interior with a gimbal or what not?
@@xr3217 No I do not. I haven't done any real estate videos yet.
You lost everyone at manual.
You can learn how to use manual in about 2 minutes of research.
@@DMTStokes I dont need two minutes..... THEY cant figure out what the face, candle, electricity, or the big M with shading means....... you think that reading a manual will teach them. HAHAHAHHAAHA...
This is a horrible video guys new photographers please don’t take this advice
Better settings would be ISO 100…. 250 is a bit much for indoors especially with a tripod.. F/11 to 16. Everything will be in focus and no blurry edges rather than at f/9. Real estate photography you’re mostly just trying to expose the outside, also shoot in aperture priority because your F stops are going to change with different exposures in manual mode, and it will be difficult for them to blend in post.
F7.1 is all you need (using a wide angle, everything is in focus unless you’re outside shooting mountains and foreground). Iso 100 isn’t used because it increases shutter time. Higher iso plus wider aperture decreases the time even more. Also, what camera are you using where your aperture is changing in manual mode?
@@Gr33n1872 Very Interesting. Sure F/7.1 can be used, any f stop could work when you shoot with a wide angle above f5.6. Anything below that is not the best idea but also depends on your lens glass. When you use ( AP )Aperture Priority Mode you can select your aperture and the camera will automatically set the shutter speed for all 3 bracketed shots , which will all be on the same F stop you choose. ISO 100 is also best for one less grain when post processing and blending all image’s together will always cause some grainy images. You’re using a tripod , not shooting hand held lol. Why would it matter how long the shutter speeds are ? Unless u have moving clouds outside the window or objects then yes crank up that ISO… shooting In Manual mode . The F stop changes with every bracket you take. I’ve started out in HDR photography about 9 years ago at its Popularity. I Don’t do much of it anymore but I will do brackets to get the full Dynamic range when taking landscapes . I started out with a crop Sensor Canon 60D . Now I’m using Sony A7R3 . And would never go back lol.