Flare of War - Tomahawk Missile

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 бер 2022
  • This video explains the strengths and construction of Tomahawk missiles.
    It consists of the missile guidance device Image-Infrared Seeker, Inertial Navigation System (INS), Terrain Contour Matching, Digital Scene Matching Area Correlation, engine, and more.
    I hope this video will help you understand the Tomahawk missile.
    #military #tomahawk #missiles #weapons #mscope
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 241

  • @fridaycaliforniaa236
    @fridaycaliforniaa236 Рік тому +60

    Just to be clear : the TERCOM doesn't use the real heights or altitudes. It uses the height variations along the way to compare with a digital map stored in memory to "guess" if the missile follows the good path to its target.
    Other interesting fact : for ship-launched tomahawks, it was not uncommon that the missile first reached a pre-programmed GPS waypoint, then used its stored ground maps to fly to its target (ships move, you can't be sure the missile will always start right on a well known place or will fly on a portion of terrain already stored in its memory). So for Gulf War, the paths the missile followed where sometimes really surprising (often a straight line to the GPS waypoint, then the normal preprogrammed turns and trajectory to the target).

    • @19MAD95
      @19MAD95 Рік тому +12

      So you’re saying the missile knows where it is because it knows where it isn’t?

    • @8bitfrenzy376
      @8bitfrenzy376 Рік тому +8

      The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is - whichever is greater - it obtains a difference or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position that it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is is now the position that it wasn't, and if follows that the position that it was is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information that the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it know where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice versa. And by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.

    • @BlueRice
      @BlueRice 8 місяців тому

      there's alot of thing he didnt covered, like a software similar to AI. they have it back then, it can scan objects like building, cars, tanks and what not to random target . if they set way point on routes it can fly endless loop until you command it only to attack tanks. when the missiles detect the tanks it will automatically target it. they have this tech over 25 years ago. impressive.

  • @krzysztof6123
    @krzysztof6123 Рік тому +12

    Great video reminiscent of MIlitary history in a minute

  • @jameshailerthepostmaster4389
    @jameshailerthepostmaster4389 Рік тому +17

    I didn't realize The Bismarck can launch Tomahawk Missile.

  • @peacekeeper9687
    @peacekeeper9687 Рік тому +7

    I like your videos, It is very interesting keep making such kind of videos 👍

  • @NonEuclideanTacoCannon
    @NonEuclideanTacoCannon Рік тому +3

    I thought the unit cost sounded low so I checked it out, they're actually $2 million per missile.

  • @user-my3yf5em1f
    @user-my3yf5em1f Рік тому +2

    This is a great racket, it's really strong, we need it 👍👍👍👍😯

  • @muhacnt7988
    @muhacnt7988 2 роки тому +13

    Looking forward to more contents

  • @alfonsovelasco9627
    @alfonsovelasco9627 Рік тому +5

    You ARE an artist !!

  • @Tiagomottadmello
    @Tiagomottadmello Рік тому

    Great, great vídeo !!! 👍🏻👍🏻

  • @CHFOP-ik1vs
    @CHFOP-ik1vs Рік тому +36

    Why do these military channels always seem to dont know about the existence of „The“

    • @aaceytuno
      @aaceytuno Рік тому +8

      Tarzan not know “the” , tomahawk friend, tomahawk blow up

    • @ninzapou
      @ninzapou Рік тому

      To save time?
      Lol

    • @abinaslimbu3057
      @abinaslimbu3057 Рік тому

      Criut body boot iron man
      Modern jet fighter
      Iron man mark 1

    • @emgee0312
      @emgee0312 Рік тому +5

      TTS script made by non native english speaker probably

    • @SeanCMonahan
      @SeanCMonahan 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@emgee0312Yes, the creator of this channel is Korean. At first, I was put off by the computerized voice. There are so many BS channels around posting AI-generated or straight-up stolen "content," so I assumed this was the same kind of stuff. I'm glad I realized this channel is different!
      They are actually creating informative content. Their animations are excellent, and they seem to be open to constructive criticism when people have pointed out errors or incorrect details in the animations.

  • @silencerstudent9381
    @silencerstudent9381 Рік тому

    Your videos are next level good

  • @Cookboy3857
    @Cookboy3857 Рік тому

    Nice amazing tamahowk

  • @michaelfleischer9795
    @michaelfleischer9795 Рік тому +1

    Top Super Animationen...👍

  • @luckytiger5551
    @luckytiger5551 16 днів тому

    Brilliant!

  • @GearTiger007
    @GearTiger007 Рік тому +5

    very nice ! hope to see more tech about the more style of guide system

  • @BIG-DIPPER-56
    @BIG-DIPPER-56 Рік тому +4

    Very good - thank you ! !
    🙂😎👍

  • @JohnLedford
    @JohnLedford Рік тому +4

    Great video! Do you do your own 3D work and animations?

  • @bobparvin9773
    @bobparvin9773 Рік тому +12

    Thanks to Texas instruments and Raytheon,. We got the best they is.

    • @rokpertrovic940
      @rokpertrovic940 Рік тому

      So you can destroy the world? Most genocide nation in the world you killed 100

    • @rokpertrovic940
      @rokpertrovic940 Рік тому

      You killed 10000000 indians are you proud american??

  • @user-cb1tg1tr8w
    @user-cb1tg1tr8w 2 роки тому

    Looking forward 😃

  • @jasons44
    @jasons44 Рік тому

    Dude I like your mind

  • @blameusa7082
    @blameusa7082 Рік тому +4

    when you know stuff, but cant say stuff 😎😎

  • @JG-dt2ub
    @JG-dt2ub Рік тому +1

    Tactical sling shots are the future

  • @lkrxlee
    @lkrxlee Рік тому +1

    Take a shot every time the narrator says 'Tomahawk' 🍻

  • @alessandrofirmani700
    @alessandrofirmani700 Рік тому

    Woooow

  • @raymondyee2008
    @raymondyee2008 Рік тому +6

    Pc games like “688i Hunter Killer”, “Sub Command” and “Dangerous Waters” let’s you command the use of Tomahawk missiles.

  • @secularsunshine9036
    @secularsunshine9036 Рік тому +1

    *Let the Sunshine in.*

  • @GandaraVideos
    @GandaraVideos 9 місяців тому

    Tomahawk missiles are also expensive to construct.

  • @johnzehrbach820
    @johnzehrbach820 Рік тому +53

    I do no know where the author got the some missed by 80 m deviation info, but to date the tomahawk is over 96% mission success meaning it hit the target close enough to destroy it. Better than any other guided missile of any type, although the TOW is close and now the Javelin.

    • @logical128
      @logical128 Рік тому +30

      They said up too 80 meters, most of the time it wont be that large of a error. Also, comparing it too a TOW or Javelin doesnt really make sense since its a cruise missile, not a anti tank weapon.

    • @nestor1208
      @nestor1208 Рік тому +20

      The author said it was before the modifications for guidance were made. Thus after the modifications, the missile became much better, elevating the percentage of successful missions

    • @josephastier7421
      @josephastier7421 Рік тому +2

      The Tomahawk has more in common with a fighter jet than either of those missiles.

  • @knight5959
    @knight5959 Рік тому +2

    can you tell what type of animation software you are using

  • @ronaldwhite1730
    @ronaldwhite1730 Рік тому

    Thank you . ( 2022 / June / 11 )

  • @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723

    V1: Kid I'm proud of you!

  • @HeavensBladeTM
    @HeavensBladeTM Рік тому

    Jesus I love this missile ! I fantasize about her !!

  • @SolarWebsite
    @SolarWebsite Рік тому +5

    The missile knows where it is because it knows where it isn't.

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 Рік тому

      B.S. It knows where it is because it receives GPS.

    • @borisdorofeev5602
      @borisdorofeev5602 Рік тому

      I knew someone would have commented this.

  • @stalkinghawk9244
    @stalkinghawk9244 Рік тому

    Does anyone know the soothing music used in the middle of the video?

  • @user-lm5rd2zo4v
    @user-lm5rd2zo4v Рік тому

    2:20 ultimate NANI moment

  • @NN-rk4mn
    @NN-rk4mn 29 днів тому

    8:30 I didn't sew you mention Bombing of Serbia in 1999. Over 350 tomahavk were lunched..

  • @marlounyunson8740
    @marlounyunson8740 Рік тому +2

    what powers the tomahawk? a very small jet engine? with a range 2500 km? what is the fuel?

  • @WalkaCrookedLine
    @WalkaCrookedLine Рік тому +7

    DSMAC as used in the first Gulf War was a visible light system. Which leads to the question how could the onboard cameras "see" at night. As I heard it explained by a naval officer, the missile actually had a giant flashbulb to light the scene. In my imagination I have this picture of some sleepy Iraqi soldier spotting these flashes, maybe two or three in sequence, and a few seconds later, BOOM. Flare of war indeed.

    • @BlueRice
      @BlueRice 8 місяців тому

      that i didnt know, wouldnt it be better having infrared light?

    • @WalkaCrookedLine
      @WalkaCrookedLine 8 місяців тому

      @@BlueRice Apparently so, as I understand it later updates switched to an infrared based system.

  • @BrianWilliamDoty
    @BrianWilliamDoty 5 місяців тому

    Man! The thing can hit you from 1500 miles away...

  • @georgieippolito9924
    @georgieippolito9924 Рік тому +5

    anyone know where i can get the jet engine for the tomahawk? ( Williams International F107-WR-402 turbofan) the engine would be a perfect fit for my hang glider and has a whopping of 900 pounds of thrust! i could soar through the sky with that baby

    • @fridaycaliforniaa236
      @fridaycaliforniaa236 Рік тому +4

      Meanwhile it's a "one use only" engine. Most of the time, it has no bearings, only cheap or weak mechanical parts (gears, etc), just a few control wires and electronic sensors (it's often designed to stay full throttle only), limited amounts of lubricant (or even sometimes no lubricant at all, just some kind of "permanent/long life" grease or polymer bearings). For example, on the French Exocet anti-ship missile, lubrication is done by the fuel itself ! The cooling system is often primitive too. Some cruise missile engines only start with an explosive cartridge, also. Your engine would only last 8~12 hours before being worn to a non return point or having it eating its internals XD.
      Just my assumptions, I was in the French Navy. Tiny engines for our cruise missiles were not meant to be "long life" items. They just had to be able to wait many years in a crate/casing before being intensively used once for a few hours run. (Sorry if my english is crap ^^)

    • @georgieippolito9924
      @georgieippolito9924 Рік тому

      @@fridaycaliforniaa236 im still interested. i could replace the bearings with ceramic bearings and work on the lubrication parts if i have to. i would be a dream come true with a lightweight jet engine mounted on my hang glider especially my sports glider

    • @tianchi4423
      @tianchi4423 Рік тому

      Get an RC jet engine. Those actually last.

    • @georgieippolito9924
      @georgieippolito9924 Рік тому

      @@tianchi4423 ill check it out. don't think there strong enough though.

    • @wally7856
      @wally7856 Рік тому

      @@georgieippolito9924 Search for "KINGTECH K450G4+" - 99lbs of thrust, should be more then enough for a hang glider.

  • @srdjanvujosevic88
    @srdjanvujosevic88 Рік тому

    1:10, how many Tomahawks were used in Yugoslavian War?

  • @dpatel2747
    @dpatel2747 Рік тому

    how blade drone work make video

  • @LithiumDeuteride-6
    @LithiumDeuteride-6 Рік тому +1

    Russia also has its own tomahawks, it was created as an almost exact copy, only a little simpler and cheaper.

    • @MM22966
      @MM22966 Рік тому +3

      Is that anything like Russia having its own stealth fighter and own 5th-gen tank?

  • @petergibbons607
    @petergibbons607 Рік тому

    that water mark is super annoying, maybe you can make it larger and less transparent, and maybe put it on there like 10 times all over the screen that might help

  • @Pinkielover
    @Pinkielover Рік тому +6

    One missile could feed me for the rest of my life and house me

    • @ddegn
      @ddegn Рік тому +12

      There aren't many edible parts of a Tomahawk. I don't think you should try eating one.
      Tomahawks missiles would make a really cramped house even if you removed things from the inside.
      I don't think you'd have a good life living in a Tomahawk while also eating a Tomahawk.

    • @dad-ms8mz
      @dad-ms8mz Рік тому

      He is talking about if he sells one🤣

    • @samu_cornia9991
      @samu_cornia9991 Рік тому

      @@dad-ms8mz yeah he's joking headass

  • @subram2011
    @subram2011 Рік тому

    Didn’t know the past tense for strike is stroke…..

  • @Slava_Yarmolenko
    @Slava_Yarmolenko Рік тому +1

    A missile knows where it is...

  • @Cameron_the_Robot
    @Cameron_the_Robot Рік тому

    To fly stably. Always make sure to fly Stably.

  • @NebulaTornado
    @NebulaTornado Рік тому +11

    Tomahawk It's the best American weapon before drones, but what about Kalibre from Russia? Can we compare to it?

    • @BennyOrgi
      @BennyOrgi Рік тому +6

      No. There are thousands and tenthousands of tomahawk systems available.
      If kalibre there are only a few dozen in store. Much likely no more anymore, because their production depends on western components, Russia won't be able to buy anymore.
      So jo, they are from a logistics and military point of view, not comparable.
      One is a real threat to nations. The other one is only a poor chance, to scare people who don't know about military industrial complexes.

  • @user-pr1sp1og6d
    @user-pr1sp1og6d Рік тому +1

    Neden çeviri yapmıyor ?

  • @truegret7778
    @truegret7778 Рік тому

    I suspect the real solution used it starting at the target and working the solution back to where it it to be launched.

  • @tommymairo8964
    @tommymairo8964 3 місяці тому

    So theoretically, it's a unmanned Kamikaze vehicle with more powerful dynamics 🤔 I wonder if the preprogrammed navigation path got leaked, whether the adversary could shot it down with patrolling fighter jets.

  • @pilotman9819
    @pilotman9819 Рік тому +3

    Middle Easterners watching this: _So, about stopping one from hitting my city?_

  • @jonswindells2728
    @jonswindells2728 Рік тому +3

    So what's the name of the missile again?????

  • @gvsf5946
    @gvsf5946 4 місяці тому

    How much silver is in a Tomahawk missile?

  • @MM22966
    @MM22966 Рік тому

    Crumpling your IADS with impunity since 1991....

  • @garrysekelli6776
    @garrysekelli6776 Рік тому +1

    Wasnt it a tomahawk that struck the pentagon on sept 11 2001?

    • @josephastier7421
      @josephastier7421 Рік тому

      Yes, however it was full of chemtrail mixture, and altered everybody's perception so they *think* it was a hijacked passenger jet.

  • @aandc2005
    @aandc2005 Рік тому

    Why don't they make a stealth version of the tomahawk.. this one is subsonic and shows up on radar even at low altitude and could be shot down.. all they would really have to do is redesign the exterior so the radar waves are deflected away and not back to the operator..

  • @pankajpankaj7041
    @pankajpankaj7041 Рік тому

    I wonder to understand tomhack tracking technology, it's very advanced and critical. 👍

  • @nesseihtgnay9419
    @nesseihtgnay9419 Рік тому

    The US also invented the cruise missile

  • @Von_DBL
    @Von_DBL Рік тому

    Hypersonic missiles cannot communicate during the last phase of flight because of the comm blackout experienced by the plasma around the object. Just like space shuttles. This means that the missiles has to rely only on inertial guidance, making the accuracy very poor and potential success low considering the limited warhead enclosed.
    This technology is not mature and will not be for a long time.

  • @snowdrop9810
    @snowdrop9810 Рік тому

    6:06 holy shit missiles have an attitude?

    • @josephastier7421
      @josephastier7421 Рік тому

      "Attitude" just means the direction that the aircraft is pointing. This is sometimes different from the direction the aircraft is moving, for instance a landing aircraft will have a nose-up attitude even though it is descending.

  • @charlesmiles9115
    @charlesmiles9115 9 місяців тому +1

    😛😛😛😛😛❤❤❤❤👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @MacksCurley
    @MacksCurley 2 роки тому +31

    It would take most people on the planet a life time to earn enough to buy a Tomahawk missile yet the Tomahawk missile exists to be destroyed and destroy life times.

    • @johnzehrbach820
      @johnzehrbach820 Рік тому +1

      About $2M now.

    • @nevajno2741
      @nevajno2741 Рік тому

      IT EXISTS NOT TO KILL PEOPLE, BUT TO DESTROY THE TERRORISTS AND ENEMIES OF THE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY (IF THERE'S OIL IN SOME FOREIGN COUNTRY OR IT DONT WANT TO RECOGNIZE USA DOMINATION, THEN ITS AN OPRESSIVE STATE SUPRESSING DEMOCRACY). TOMAHAWK IS LITERALLY BRINGING DEMOCRACY AND FREEDOM TO ANOTHER COUNTRIES - MORE TOMAHAWKS = MORE DEMOCRACY AND LESS COMMUNISM

    • @MacksCurley
      @MacksCurley Рік тому +1

      @@nevajno2741 What rock are you living under?

    • @nevajno2741
      @nevajno2741 Рік тому +3

      @@MacksCurley UNDER MURICAN ROCK, BEST ROCK ON THE PLANET 💪
      MURICAAA, F... YEEEEEAHH 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅🦅🗽🗽🗽

    • @marcos0055101
      @marcos0055101 Рік тому

      Enemies*

  • @h.n.t.d7963
    @h.n.t.d7963 Рік тому

    I think ill just call it long range suicide drone from now on lmao

  • @nilalohitadey9246
    @nilalohitadey9246 Рік тому

    But ballistic missile can hit target very very far like 10000 km that is why icbm are better than other tipe of missile

  • @iivin4233
    @iivin4233 Рік тому

    I'm not sure I believe tomahawks are cheaper than planes. Much more tonnage of explosives was dropped by planes in the Gulf War than was delivered by tomahawks.
    That doesn't necessarily prove anything but one of the more expensive aspects of a weapon that flies is the part that flies.
    With a tomahawk you have to build a new, admittedly small, airframe for every payload you want to launch. A plane is reusable.

  • @kjererrrt2381
    @kjererrrt2381 Рік тому +1

    i remember how the russians downed them all with an electronic warfare system in syria when the yanks were trying to destroy an airfield. teh few missiles that did break through didn't hit anything substantial.

    • @rael5469
      @rael5469 Рік тому +1

      Propaganda lies.

  • @marleyboy7732
    @marleyboy7732 Рік тому

    Tomahawk missles are expensive.
    Tomahawk missles are fast.
    Tomahawk missles are big.
    Tomahawk missle.
    Tomahawk.....Tomahawk......Oh and um Tomahawk.🤣

  • @4lpina
    @4lpina Рік тому

    2:29 It's American missile, why would it divide area into equal 100 meter sectors? Or is 100 meter just a coincidence?

    • @ablasttv
      @ablasttv Рік тому

      Engineers use metric even in America.

  • @mackjsm7105
    @mackjsm7105 Рік тому

    The Missile DOES NOT have a IR seeker.

  • @ToBeIsWasWere
    @ToBeIsWasWere Рік тому +1

    bro why do you only speak singular

  • @pernykvist3442
    @pernykvist3442 Рік тому

    They was shot down over Syria.
    So wonder if a next generation is
    under production, with EMP shield
    and stealth abillity?

  • @Klarpimier
    @Klarpimier Рік тому

    But does Tomahawk Missile know where it is?

  • @kiloton1920
    @kiloton1920 Рік тому

    450kg warhead? Ouch

  • @rchristie5401
    @rchristie5401 Рік тому

    only 20 years late

  • @user-ju6pc1fl4y
    @user-ju6pc1fl4y Рік тому +1

    Нам дуже потрібні такі ракети в бородьбі за свободу!

  • @EC-it2fx
    @EC-it2fx Рік тому

    $0.57 million per Tomahawk missile

  • @loadofstuff10
    @loadofstuff10 Рік тому

    Robot voice..

  • @pradeepsahu4121
    @pradeepsahu4121 Рік тому

    Tell about sophisticated Hydrogen bomb W88

  • @christophercharles9645
    @christophercharles9645 Рік тому

    Very good video but what's up with the narration? Very stiff and some weird grammar choices - like not using "the" half the time where applicable.

  • @deykiidey6495
    @deykiidey6495 5 місяців тому

    Your f16 price shown in this vide is inaccurate because real f 16 cost 63 million dollars.

  • @arawan5anothai054
    @arawan5anothai054 Рік тому

    Ok

  • @stevejobs1653
    @stevejobs1653 Рік тому +1

    Why did he say the word Tomahawk so few times??

    • @simplyyellow6240
      @simplyyellow6240 Рік тому +2

      Cause he get paid everytime he said that.

    • @pauligel9117
      @pauligel9117 Рік тому +1

      @@simplyyellow6240 *why this missile is so рrasize, that it could hit Рutins asshole in Kremlin*

  • @ntnurdu4532
    @ntnurdu4532 Рік тому +1

    Pakistan also have this missile and after upgrades it's become more dangerous than USA tomohok ... It's have longer range and can fire form surface,air and sea.. know as Pakistan,s Babur 1, Babur 2 and Babur 3

    • @someguy4915
      @someguy4915 Рік тому

      'tomohok' Lmao you can't even properly spell it's name.

  • @rabidpeanut3703
    @rabidpeanut3703 Рік тому

    Why does it sound like Tomahawk is speaking in the third person like elmo? English.

  • @notagudartistbutiamtrying1854

    Mscope makes videos. Mscope make video about missile. Mscope not use word The.

  • @mohamedm.el-sawymd2325
    @mohamedm.el-sawymd2325 Рік тому

    كل الصواريخ التي اطلقت استخدمت ضد بلاد عربية اسلامية ... لا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله ...

  • @Werepie
    @Werepie Рік тому +5

    This would be a great video, were it not voiced by this god-awful, overused robo-narrator.

  • @quantico_x9320
    @quantico_x9320 Рік тому

    Nice???

  • @meatballs9453
    @meatballs9453 Рік тому

    Count how many times he says tomahawk 😢

  • @kevinderrick2787
    @kevinderrick2787 Рік тому

    What language was this translated from??

  • @mure.13
    @mure.13 Рік тому

    العراق ايكول انة شعلية

  • @Kopan-uy67iih
    @Kopan-uy67iih Рік тому

    Так и не понял ничего.

  • @MikeHunt-rw4gf
    @MikeHunt-rw4gf Рік тому

    Algorithm.

  • @nigelT16
    @nigelT16 Рік тому +2

    Although very technologically impressive, leave it to humans to put this much time and $$ into death and destruction

  • @arefkr
    @arefkr Рік тому +2

    It's not the Gulf War. It is the Persian Gulf war.

  • @xyz-iz2kf
    @xyz-iz2kf Рік тому

    brahmos

  • @giovanni4151
    @giovanni4151 Рік тому +2

    stop repeating 3000 time the subject name. it's annoyng

  • @TheMrGREENRay
    @TheMrGREENRay Рік тому

    8:21 Yugoslavia in 1999 (nowaday Serbia territory)