Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves | Thieves' Gallery | D&D

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 82

  • @DNDWizards
    @DNDWizards  Рік тому +8

    ►►Claim the Thieves’ Gallery at no cost: dndbeyond.link/yt_ThievesGallery
    What’s the most unusual inspiration you’ve used to create an NPC for your party?

    • @Mark-ki7ic
      @Mark-ki7ic Рік тому +2

      R. Lee Emery, Mr. Rogers, an undead Bob Ross

    • @DerekLippold
      @DerekLippold Рік тому

      A welcome and unexpected surprise!

    • @ludovicvandeville7436
      @ludovicvandeville7436 Рік тому

      I can't see the gallery on site. I have an account. I don't understand. Someone can help me?

  • @happyslapsgiving5421
    @happyslapsgiving5421 Рік тому +27

    "So, how long is the movie going to stay in theaters?"
    " *ELEVEN DAYS!* "

    • @Gladuos1
      @Gladuos1 Рік тому +9

      "How long has it been out?"
      " ELEVEN DAYS! "

  • @GregorifElfeNoir
    @GregorifElfeNoir Рік тому +57

    You had the occasion to call it a "Gallery of Rogues", and you blew it off :O

    • @alexfirefly1956
      @alexfirefly1956 Рік тому +5

      I mean... not all of them are rogues...

    • @GregorifElfeNoir
      @GregorifElfeNoir Рік тому +2

      @@alexfirefly1956 A Gallery of Rogues is what is called the regular antagonists of heroes , like Joker, Red Skull, etc
      That is the point I am making :)

    • @nekonyansensei
      @nekonyansensei Рік тому +4

      Probably nixed by someone due to brand consistency issues

    • @MrCytoplasm
      @MrCytoplasm Рік тому +7

      Its playing off of the movies title, honor among thieves = thieves gallery

    • @LeMayJoseph
      @LeMayJoseph Рік тому +1

      @@MrCytoplasm right? That choice seems the thematically correct one, and doesn’t muddle the marketing of the movie title.

  • @TonyCrenshawsLatte
    @TonyCrenshawsLatte Рік тому +10

    Our band of heroes/thieves have a lot more HP than I would have expected!

  • @mslabo102s2
    @mslabo102s2 Рік тому +6

    Read through the stats and they all got very interesting traits. Between Witchlight and this, recent adventurer stat blocks have been consistently interesting. Can't wait to find an opportunity to base my NPCs on them (I usually run in my homebrew world).

  • @mj101inf9
    @mj101inf9 Рік тому +2

    Just noticed in the artwork that the sorcerer has a Bag Of Holding! I hope we actually get to see that in the movie. My D&D group has a running joke that if you need to smuggle a bunch of weapons past the castle guards, step one is to keister a bag of holding…

  • @mattspaar7751
    @mattspaar7751 Рік тому +6

    Calling it now. The Paladin gets eaten by Thumberchaud as he jumps to save the bard from the trailer.

  • @Najahiri
    @Najahiri Рік тому +17

    Why not sharing directly the "pregenerated characters" mentioned? I'd be curious about those!

    • @chand911
      @chand911 Рік тому +8

      Literally in the description champ.

    • @justininexile3445
      @justininexile3445 Рік тому +1

      ​@@chand911 where? I only see link to the NPC versions in DNDBeyond

  • @olethorvaldhelland6989
    @olethorvaldhelland6989 Рік тому +10

    I wonder if Sofina's listed vulnerability is a typo meant to be resistance or if its intentional (and thus a spoiler?)...

  • @JediKnightDTV
    @JediKnightDTV Рік тому +14

    I would have rather had the full-on Character Sheets rather than Stat Blocks... will they be available in the future?

  • @sevarogue7903
    @sevarogue7903 Рік тому +10

    I can't wait for the movie!🥰

  • @Ziaotic
    @Ziaotic Рік тому +4

    i 2as hoping they would upload statsheets for this film stats posters would be excellent advertisement

  • @ReadingDave
    @ReadingDave Рік тому +6

    I am curious if the movie inspired Chris Perkins to create anything new.

  • @fredericgenest
    @fredericgenest Рік тому +6

    I have a hard time waiting for the movie to come out!

  • @KnicKnac
    @KnicKnac Рік тому +5

    Movie just seems like a fun entertaining time. Looking forward to some goofy fantasy adventure

  • @WckD135
    @WckD135 Рік тому +5

    "it must have been a strange experience to give fictional characters stat blocks" said no one who plays dnd ever. Come on guys! We do it all the time! There are stats for Pickle Rick online!

  • @theblindbuildergrandminuti5648

    There are some I interesting ideas on these stat blocks. I can see some one dnd play test in some of these designs.

  • @ViZet85
    @ViZet85 Рік тому +1

    So, Simon is a descendant of Elminster himself? It should be pretty tough to live up to the name, especially without control of his own power.

  • @JackOfHearts42
    @JackOfHearts42 Рік тому +1

    Nice! I will read these stat blocks right after Me and my gaming group go see them movie together.

  • @GoldPoptart
    @GoldPoptart Рік тому +3

    It’s great to hear Chris’s voice again ☺️

  • @acidreflow1553
    @acidreflow1553 Рік тому +2

    When he speaks...all I can think of is Spurt

  • @ready1take1
    @ready1take1 Рік тому +2

    todd i'm still not used to seeing you with hair!

  • @RavenHouseMystery
    @RavenHouseMystery Рік тому +2

    "Players of course have their own characters." Not if WotC has anything to say about that in the future.

  • @thefirstofthelastones8952
    @thefirstofthelastones8952 Рік тому

    Wish they added a Dwarf Cleric that quote on quote "Kick a** for the lord"

  • @elementzero3379
    @elementzero3379 Рік тому +3

    The Druid in the thumbnail looks dead on Cara Delevigne, which probably wasn't the goal.

    • @feeltheflumph
      @feeltheflumph Рік тому +2

      Cara Delevigne and Sophia Lillis look very similar

    • @elementzero3379
      @elementzero3379 Рік тому +3

      @@feeltheflumph I don't see it, but clearly the artist did and others do. 😉

    • @magdalenavalentinastegaru8531
      @magdalenavalentinastegaru8531 Рік тому

      I had to Google the name. I doubt many DnD players are into fashion.

    • @elementzero3379
      @elementzero3379 Рік тому

      @@magdalenavalentinastegaru8531 I certainly don't follow fashion. She's an actress. Yes, she still does some modeling, but I imagine most here have seen her film and TV work. (Or at the least North American audiences have.)
      The 2nd season of "Carnival Row"" is streaming now, for instance, and likely has a lot of overlap with a D&D movie audience.

  • @Jeffs40K
    @Jeffs40K Рік тому

    I love this Idea of making stats for the Characters in the movie, and would love to see some adventures written to use these characters in also BUT, not a Big fan then saying they Dummed down the character's stats to help the DM, like were too stupid to understand a stat block 8( I play mostly 1e with Thako and Reverse AC I think I can figure out simple 5e stats

    • @steveaustin2686
      @steveaustin2686 Рік тому

      More like condensing the 5th to 16th level characters from a full sheet to a stat block.

  • @theblindbuildergrandminuti5648

    Why doesn’t the barbarian have damage mitigation, nor damage bonuses?
    I don’t think it’s hard to track IMO.
    Auto make it simple, reduce damage by the stat block PB.

    • @steveaustin2686
      @steveaustin2686 Рік тому

      They have 5th to 8th level proficiency bonus, but 16th or so HD & hp. So don't really need it, but you certainly can add if if you want.

  • @CharlesKhan
    @CharlesKhan Рік тому +3

    I’d like to see them stat out the characters from the first movie. I hope the rumors of Marlon Wayans getting revived in this new movie are true!

  • @GhoulishGlee
    @GhoulishGlee Рік тому +2

    Simon... the sorcerer? xD

  • @MindsEyeVeilPodcast
    @MindsEyeVeilPodcast Рік тому

    Interesting to say the least 🧝‍♀️

  • @magdalenavalentinastegaru8531
    @magdalenavalentinastegaru8531 Рік тому +1

    You know something is good when people must resort to mental gymnastics to find fault.
    .

  • @ShadeMeadows
    @ShadeMeadows Рік тому +2

    *H Y P E D*

  • @earl528
    @earl528 Рік тому +2

    I am sorry to say, I am boycotting the new D&D film, because of Paramount's decision to renew Alex KLUTZman's Star Trek contract. I am a huge fan of both D&D and OLD Star Trek. However, Paramount's dumb decision has infuriated me, and I will no longer give Paramount a dime of my money anymore. Sorry that your film became collateral damage in my decision.

  • @AaronArnoldaquapod
    @AaronArnoldaquapod Рік тому

    This... it's happening

  • @psyberian
    @psyberian Рік тому +3

    They the explanation for the Druid owlbear...we just made it all up giving her an Owlbear shape, wildshape 5 times a day, and letting her wildshape into things up to CR 3 when she is level 8 at best with a proficiency bonus of +3.

    • @elementzero3379
      @elementzero3379 Рік тому +3

      She's an NPC. Why is it so important?

    • @davidgomes4408
      @davidgomes4408 Рік тому +3

      The explanation for the druid owlbear is in the latest ODnD playtest.
      That said, given how you reacted to a NPC statblock not following player rules, the new wildshape rules might just finish you off...
      Fair warning is fair.

    • @psyberian
      @psyberian Рік тому +1

      @@davidgomes4408 nope, read them and like most OneD&D stuff so far it seems like they are trying to turn D&D into a video game

    • @davidgomes4408
      @davidgomes4408 Рік тому +3

      @@psyberian really? I've found the changes to be rather...mild, so far. Timid, even.
      It really feels more like a 5.5e in the works rather than a full blown new Ed.
      Time will tell I guess.
      In the meantime: let's simply agree to disagree.

    • @TRobBrownPhotography
      @TRobBrownPhotography Рік тому +1

      ​@davidgomes4408 well... 5E is technically 6E anyway...
      1st = basic D&D, 2nd = AD&D, 3rd = AD&D 2E, 4th = D&D 3.0E/3.5E, 5th = D&D 4E, 6th = D&D 5E

  • @Abelhawk
    @Abelhawk Рік тому

    Spoilers!

  • @vernonhampton5863
    @vernonhampton5863 Рік тому +1

    They named the druid dork... yeah.

    • @davidgomes4408
      @davidgomes4408 Рік тому +3

      I mean...the way I see it, someone being offended by Dorik sounding like dork says more about said someone than about the writers.
      In my opinion anyway.

    • @magdalenavalentinastegaru8531
      @magdalenavalentinastegaru8531 Рік тому +2

      Doric is an ancient Greek region that gave the name of Doric style from its temples to architectures and sculptures. It is taught in middle school at basic history in all Europe, so few people here would think of American slang when hearing Doric.

  • @WooootSD
    @WooootSD Рік тому

    Looking at stats, and I am suprised - based on hitdice, they are lvl 16-21??? Really?
    Havent seen the movie, but expected it would be a group of rookies - but these are badasses.

    • @steveaustin2686
      @steveaustin2686 Рік тому

      Based on their proficiency bonus, they are 5th to 8th level. I'm guessing a mix to show level ups maybe. The BBEG is throwing 9th level spells, so they need to be up there a bit.

  • @kurtisdeakin
    @kurtisdeakin Рік тому +1

    No dwarf. Ya lost me.

  • @thiago4santos
    @thiago4santos Рік тому

    Just need to fix Simon's ears.

  • @dogdriver70
    @dogdriver70 Рік тому

    Nothing says "I have NF clue about D&D" quite like a D&D hat.

    • @emilymartin5418
      @emilymartin5418 Рік тому +1

      Oh, this is delicious. Gatekeeping a hobby based on clothing is one thing, claiming that the story designer for Ravenloft and DM of Acquisitions Inc has no clue about the game is just **chef's kiss**.

    • @dogdriver70
      @dogdriver70 Рік тому

      @@emilymartin5418 not gatekeeping at all, just observing that a true fan would rock a a D&D hat with flavor, not the brand itself. Imagine a football fan with a hat that read "NFL" instead of a team or individual player.

    • @emilymartin5418
      @emilymartin5418 Рік тому +1

      @@dogdriver70 that is the definition of gatekeeping.

    • @dogdriver70
      @dogdriver70 Рік тому

      @@emilymartin5418 no it isn't, it's calling out a shill

    • @emilymartin5418
      @emilymartin5418 Рік тому +1

      @@dogdriver70 you literally used the phrase in the Urban Dictionary for gatekeeping: "A word used to describe when someone sets a standard/limit on what someone must do to call themselves a 'true fan' of something/someone."
      And Chris Perkins cannot be a shill because he's not hiding that he works for Wizards. It's his job to be one of the public-facing employees.
      From Wikipedia this time: "A shill [...] is a person who publicly helps or gives credibility to a person or organization without disclosing that they have a close relationship with said person or organization."
      Talk about 'confidently incorrect'!