As a Canadian, I am still malding over the CSeries Fiasco. Boeing and the Trump administration played dirty with that dumping petition. If it wasn't for Airbus buying stake of the plane and turning it into the A220, it's likely the plane would have never seen the light of day. Would it have broken the duopoly? Maybe not, but the fact Bombardier was never given the chance due to US meddling still infuriates me.
Honestly, hearing a company with 50% global market share crying about "dumping" of a jet barely even starting to sell is maddening. Those regulators got good money from Booing.
The Canadian government gave large subsidies to Bombardier that allowed them to sell to *American* airlines at a large discount, Trump introduced tariffs to even it out and protect American manufacturing, later the ITC threw out the tariffs anyways because Boeing doesn’t sell a plane that small. “American meddling” 😂 you rely on our consumer market we can meddle as much as we like. Canada and Europe already harass American companies all the time.
Don't forget Boeing doesn't even have a C series size plane in the market nor they plan to build one. They just try to block Bombardier get their foot in the door.
Today's Boeing is really McDonnell Douglas in all but name. It's the reason why Boeing is in the the state it's in more: the McDonnell Douglas beancounters gradually destroyed Boeing's engineering culture.
Not really. This type of talk is mostly Boeing PR trying to absolve themselves of any mistakes and preserve their brand. The company as a whole has sucked.
@@fleshreap Boeing was one of America's greatest engineering companies until the merger with McDonnel Douglas, who moved the corporate headquarters to Chicago from Seattle where all the engineering work happened. Then aggressive cost cutting and rocky leadership changes have eroded the culture at Boeing, a company once admired for its engineering rigor. Labor was consistently underpaid, overworked and subject to sudden cuts in benefits. Additionally, transferring production sites and threats to move work elsewhere reduced workers' bargaining power. Boeing has compromised their engineering in the name of cost savings so much so that they can no longer make a new aircraft design that's safe and their ongoing maintenance is in shambles. The new CEO is moving the headquarters back to Seattle to be close to where the design teams reside and hopes to bring Boeing back to a top notch engineering company. We'll see if it's just a PR move.
Hello, I invested in Embraer stock and i need to put some essential information about it... Embraer was created by the military junta and later privatised, half of the company is in Brazil and the other half in the US, nevertheless, the biggest advantage of Embraer is their efficiency and engineering (they never had an accident).... most (if is not all) engineers are from the Aeronautics Institute of Technology, a military school that is one of the most sophisticated in the continent. So in this situation, Embraer is a civilian company but with a military workforce (and Boeing already tried to steal some workers with the failed joint-venture).
They also have the advantage that Brazil is not considered "the west" so countries that are less friendly with the west can buy jets from Embraer (or Comac in the future).
No, not “most of the engineers come from the Aeronautics Institute”. The Engineer pool is quite diverse. The minority that come from there are civilians.
Boeing has suffered horribly from being cross-subsidised by the US military and US protectionism, which have doomed it to being culturally deeply lazy, wasteful and uncompetitive.
Airbus has indirect subsidies in Europe as well. What killed Boeing was MacDonald-Douglass Executives basically taking over the company and changing it's engineering centred focus.
This incorrect pronunciation of Bombardier is horrifying. They manufacture some of the trains here in the UK, so it’s not as though they’re even ‘foreign’ It’s bomb bar d eh. Not bomb a deer.
It's a TLDR video. They're legally obligated to mispronounce at least one name during an episode. Unless it's the female narrator, in which case she will flawlessly pronounce each and every 35-letter German word like it's nothing.
"Horrifying" please get over yourself. You know what he meant. I feel like Anglophones are the only ones in the entire world who get so much shit for mispronouncing foreign words, and it's totally okay when people who speak other languages do the same. If we're gonna blame anything, maybe it's the language where we spell foreign words exactly the same as in their original language, and so we get the English word "bombardier" vs. the French word "bombardier" being pronounced entirely differently. I'm tired of people pretending to be traumatised when a speaker of a language infamous for words not matching their pronunciation says a foreign word slightly wrong, even when you can easily tell what word they are saying. In this case, pronouncing it the same as the English homograph bombardier. It's the most minor shit ever and people like you pretend to freak out over it. Big whoop. Sorry many of us don't feel the need to look up the phonetics of every single proper noun before we say them instead of focusing on things that actually matter.
@@escape209 Get over yourself. It’s a well-known multinational company that someone reporting on should ensure they know how to pronounce before doing said reporting. That falls under basic reporting research. You wouldn’t expect a news reporter to talk about the fashion company ver says, you would expect them to talk about ver sah che.
You're pronouncing bombardier as an English word spelled in English. but it's French and pronounced that way. Something like Bomb-Bar-dee-Eh, with the Canadian Eh at the end would be pretty close
The way you pronounced Bombardier & Embraer.... Anyway I'm still sad that Bombardier's C-Series failed under their name... Now I just hope that Embraer's potential 737 competitor won't fall into a similar fate.
Those numbers are wrong, Airbus and Boeing didn't hold 100% of the comercial airplane market, they held just shy of 80%. The smaller planes market is pretty big and Embraer holds more than 10% of the total aircraft market while Bombardier used to hold a similar position before the whole series C fiasco and the Airbus buyout. Embraer almost suffered the same destiny as Bombardier, almost getting boight by Boeing, but luckly that was reversed.
If I were Airbus and Boeing I wouldn't worry about the C919, but I might worry about its successor. I can see some African countries which rely heavily on Chinese investment (or debt traps, depending on your perspective) buying some COMAC planes as well. But North Korea can't buy them because they contain too many Western components.
Everyone seems to underestimate how deep Boeing's connection go. It is unlikely that Boeing will lose major share even with this much hassle. Short term yes, they'll go through immense trouble but long term they'll fix everything up and be back to square one.
there is one more aircraft manufacturer that has the know-how, resources and is building commercial jets right now, but russia's united aircraft corporation is definitely not going to expand into western markets to challenge airbus any time soon.
The CSeries was (and sort of still is) the greatest airplane ever made by Canada. And that includes the Avro Arrow. Unlike the Arrow which was quite comparable to its contemporary fighters, the CSeries was genuinely a cutting edge, modern airliner that outclassed the 737MAX-7 and Airbus A319neo. While the program saw some limited success under Bombardier, it has been incredibly successful under Airbus. They just cannot build them fast enough to meet demand.
It's so frustrating that people suggest that BYD is "competing." If an entire country is essentially subsidizing all your expenses - hundreds of billions of them - that's not competition.
This duopoly needs to be broken. You cannot regulate an industry when there are just two players. Regulators play footsie with the company executives for after jobs. And governments don't want to piss them off, because they are a behemoth. The most obvious benefit might just be the price apart from a whole load of newer models.
The problem is the costs of developing aircraft. These aircraft require tons of money to be pumped in, money that would-be competitors just don’t have. It’s the reason why all competitors are focusing on smaller aircraft, because they couldn’t possibly afford to develop an aircraft themselves the size of the 777 or A330, only the CR929 developed jointly by China and Russia is near that size. Airbus and Boeing wouldn’t be able to survive if they were smaller, they just wouldn’t able to afford development costs of large aircraft. It’s an industry where the starting costs are just so massive.
With China being such a huge market for airplanes and most of its airliners being state owned/controlled it’s a matter of time for COMAC (also state owned/controlled) to become one of the biggest plane manufacturer.
Ah, I was waiting for the inevitable COMAC story. They have delivered a full 24 aircrafts in the past 12 months. (Airbus is delivered something around 750, I cannot be bothered to look it up)
There's also the Irkut MC-21 from Russia, a 737/A320-sized jet which was just about ready to come onto the market before Putin decided invading Ukraine was a higher priority. They're working on a "Russification" plan to replace sanctioned Western components and might be able to sell a few to Iran, North Korea, and other sanctioned and/or Russian client states. After the Superjet fiasco it's unlikely they would have sold any to Western airlines, but now we'll never know. (The Superjet is also undergoing "Russification," though I've also read the program was sold to a UAE-based company so who even knows what's going on with it.)
Comac’s C919 will not be purchased by foreign airline companies for a while. If Comac suffered any aircraft accidents then the Chinese Aviation Safety Board will have to be deployed to investigate their domestic airplane’s accident scene. Since many nations fear espionage from China, having Chinese government agents inside their borders to investigate a Comac accident will be risky in their view. But I can see Embraer being a third airplane maker in an aerospace trio-poly.
Fun Fact: US Gov forced CFM to only provide Comac the inferior version of their LEAP engine (LEAP-1C), while Boeing and Airbus enjoys the much more advanced LEAP-1A and B. This is the reason behind its worse operating economics.
I'd say there are two outcomes: 1) The air industry completely collapses OR 2) China invests in Embraer to build bigger planes, to muscle their way into Western markets
Chinese companies always produce for the domestic market at first. After they meet the demands of the market and gain adequate experience, these companies begin to look for other markets. We have witnessed these scenarios in consumer electronics and electric vehicle industries. Even if it will take a lot of time, Comac will eventually be an important player in aerospace industry.
The costs of developing new aircraft are just simply so massive that only Boeing and Airbus can hope to afford to develop them. It’s why Bombardier almost went broke developing the C Series.
If planes were simpler they probably could. But nobody predicted the sheer size of Boeings screw-ups. And you can't scale the production of big-ahh jets overnight. The supply chain is huge for that. Though production is increasing since Airbus A320 neo now have a backlog of a decade or something.
AIRBUS have an excellent product range (better and deeper than Boeing) and make very good aircraft - their supply chain problems are not of their own making and they have no substantial quality problems. Embraer indeed have an opportunity to expand due to the very long delivery times of Boeing and Airbus. Comac is politically a o non-starter other than the Chinese areas of influence. As i would never buy a chinese car people will be wary of buying chinese aircraft for valid political reasons. Boeing is a sad case of people selling out to the stock market and not focusing on their once exemplary engineering skills. I believe they cannot continue as they are currently structured and will certainly be re-organised and perhaps broken down into much more effective parts. It will take time but they will come back. A huge market is foreseen for the coming 20 years but no contender can overtake Boeing or AIRBUS.
They didn't invent it but the 707 (with an assist from the Douglas DC-8) really brought jet travel to the masses. The De Haviland Comet never recovered from its initial crashes, and the Soviet Tu-104 was a noisy and uncomfortable converted military plane with a poor safety record in its own right.
Those Chinese aircraft are a real threat to Airbus and Boeing. Clearly none of the established European or North American airlines would want any Chinese aircraft on their fleet, which is where budget airlines come in. When a budget airliner can run a service cheaper because they use a cheaper aircraft then that will make that Chinese airplane an major threat. Most people who fly don't have any clue about the airplane they are flying on, even if 10% cared that isn't going to stop the Chinese.
I had to stop watching this at 3:45. This is one of thoe worst videos for fact checking and pronounciation I've ever seen on this channel. Thumbs down.
Aweee TLDR cuties skipping the Boeing deaths completely 🥹 Language is a powerful yet subtle tool of manipulation.. when you call it a "threat to the duopoly" you are basically implying the duopoly needs to be protected... "Credible challange" is when you wanna support the breaking of duopoly...but well you know why you do that
Fr that's disgusting they deliver the analysis/news like everything was alright with Boeing until the door fell off. Don't the lives of the people outside the US matter or what?!! Oh it's ok for two airplanes to crash killing hundreds even if the company is ours as long as they are not our people it's all good that's what it sounded like to me.
Boeing can make an Airbus monopoly
Beat me to it! 😂 Ec- freaking- cactly
As a Canadian, I am still malding over the CSeries Fiasco. Boeing and the Trump administration played dirty with that dumping petition. If it wasn't for Airbus buying stake of the plane and turning it into the A220, it's likely the plane would have never seen the light of day.
Would it have broken the duopoly? Maybe not, but the fact Bombardier was never given the chance due to US meddling still infuriates me.
💯
Honestly, hearing a company with 50% global market share crying about "dumping" of a jet barely even starting to sell is maddening. Those regulators got good money from Booing.
The Canadian government gave large subsidies to Bombardier that allowed them to sell to *American* airlines at a large discount, Trump introduced tariffs to even it out and protect American manufacturing, later the ITC threw out the tariffs anyways because Boeing doesn’t sell a plane that small. “American meddling” 😂 you rely on our consumer market we can meddle as much as we like. Canada and Europe already harass American companies all the time.
The US is a master at meddling in foreign business and policy when they see that it can be a serious competitor to the local industry.
Don't forget Boeing doesn't even have a C series size plane in the market nor they plan to build one. They just try to block Bombardier get their foot in the door.
Calling it bombardier probably also doesnt do wonders
Pronounced "bom bar DI-AIR" though
@@archmage_of_the_aether It's pronounced "bom bar dee ay" ("ay" as in "day")" in the native language of the company's founder it is named after.
@@phant0 yes, I am a mother tongue speaker of that language, and a resident of the province from which sprang Bombardier.
@@archmage_of_the_aetherur Quebecois
Today's Boeing is really McDonnell Douglas in all but name. It's the reason why Boeing is in the the state it's in more: the McDonnell Douglas beancounters gradually destroyed Boeing's engineering culture.
Not really. This type of talk is mostly Boeing PR trying to absolve themselves of any mistakes and preserve their brand. The company as a whole has sucked.
@@fleshreap Boeing was one of America's greatest engineering companies until the merger with McDonnel Douglas, who moved the corporate headquarters to Chicago from Seattle where all the engineering work happened. Then aggressive cost cutting and rocky leadership changes have eroded the culture at Boeing, a company once admired for its engineering rigor. Labor was consistently underpaid, overworked and subject to sudden cuts in benefits. Additionally, transferring production sites and threats to move work elsewhere reduced workers' bargaining power. Boeing has compromised their engineering in the name of cost savings so much so that they can no longer make a new aircraft design that's safe and their ongoing maintenance is in shambles. The new CEO is moving the headquarters back to Seattle to be close to where the design teams reside and hopes to bring Boeing back to a top notch engineering company. We'll see if it's just a PR move.
@@fleshreapno he’s right. Regardless Boeings are pieces of 💩. And i fly em
@billweberx it looks like Boeing are in big trouble
I'm sad SAAB didn't succeed with their commercial aircrafts. The SAAB 2000 seems to be their last attempt, and that was in the 90s.
Hello, I invested in Embraer stock and i need to put some essential information about it...
Embraer was created by the military junta and later privatised, half of the company is in Brazil and the other half in the US, nevertheless, the biggest advantage of Embraer is their efficiency and engineering (they never had an accident).... most (if is not all) engineers are from the Aeronautics Institute of Technology, a military school that is one of the most sophisticated in the continent. So in this situation, Embraer is a civilian company but with a military workforce (and Boeing already tried to steal some workers with the failed joint-venture).
They also have the advantage that Brazil is not considered "the west" so countries that are less friendly with the west can buy jets from Embraer (or Comac in the future).
No, not “most of the engineers come from the Aeronautics Institute”. The Engineer pool is quite diverse.
The minority that come from there are civilians.
Boeing has suffered horribly from being cross-subsidised by the US military and US protectionism, which have doomed it to being culturally deeply lazy, wasteful and uncompetitive.
Like a 30 year old man still being breast fed by his mum Boeing is unable to wean itself off the government breast.
Nothing to do with the administration of course xuntdaddy
Airbus has indirect subsidies in Europe as well.
What killed Boeing was MacDonald-Douglass Executives basically taking over the company and changing it's engineering centred focus.
That and McDonald Douglas basically took over the Boeing board of directors after the merger and Douglas were always more profit motivated than safety
I've always been amused by how humble Airbus' name is. "It's like a bus, but in the air!"
I'm equally amused about GM and GE and all the other "general" companies
This incorrect pronunciation of Bombardier is horrifying.
They manufacture some of the trains here in the UK, so it’s not as though they’re even ‘foreign’
It’s bomb bar d eh. Not bomb a deer.
It's a TLDR video. They're legally obligated to mispronounce at least one name during an episode. Unless it's the female narrator, in which case she will flawlessly pronounce each and every 35-letter German word like it's nothing.
"Horrifying" please get over yourself. You know what he meant.
I feel like Anglophones are the only ones in the entire world who get so much shit for mispronouncing foreign words, and it's totally okay when people who speak other languages do the same.
If we're gonna blame anything, maybe it's the language where we spell foreign words exactly the same as in their original language, and so we get the English word "bombardier" vs. the French word "bombardier" being pronounced entirely differently.
I'm tired of people pretending to be traumatised when a speaker of a language infamous for words not matching their pronunciation says a foreign word slightly wrong, even when you can easily tell what word they are saying. In this case, pronouncing it the same as the English homograph bombardier. It's the most minor shit ever and people like you pretend to freak out over it. Big whoop. Sorry many of us don't feel the need to look up the phonetics of every single proper noun before we say them instead of focusing on things that actually matter.
@@JollyOldCanuck I’m aware. That doesn’t change any of what I’ve said.
@@escape209 Get over yourself. It’s a well-known multinational company that someone reporting on should ensure they know how to pronounce before doing said reporting. That falls under basic reporting research.
You wouldn’t expect a news reporter to talk about the fashion company ver says, you would expect them to talk about ver sah che.
@@escape209Completely agree 👍
Honda should get in this space, they already make small jets and are trusted by the entire world
You're pronouncing bombardier as an English word spelled in English. but it's French and pronounced that way. Something like Bomb-Bar-dee-Eh, with the Canadian Eh at the end would be pretty close
I verbally burst out laughing hearing him pronounce bombardier lmao
Honestly Boeing might be the one to break it because of all of the incidents going on with them recently.
Deeply insightful
As they should. The wheels fell off, and the door blew out, and they flew their business into the ground. Twice!
How are wheels falling off Boeing issues?
@@alexrebmann1253 metaphor dude... slamming company into the ground, TWICE! METAPHOR.
Here at Boeing, we focus on keeping our stock price high and stable like our planes do - almost all of the time
The way you pronounced Bombardier & Embraer....
Anyway I'm still sad that Bombardier's C-Series failed under their name... Now I just hope that Embraer's potential 737 competitor won't fall into a similar fate.
It didn't fail. It fell prey to political lobbying. The C-Series is a great and reliable plane that has made Airbus a ton of money.
Those numbers are wrong, Airbus and Boeing didn't hold 100% of the comercial airplane market, they held just shy of 80%. The smaller planes market is pretty big and Embraer holds more than 10% of the total aircraft market while Bombardier used to hold a similar position before the whole series C fiasco and the Airbus buyout. Embraer almost suffered the same destiny as Bombardier, almost getting boight by Boeing, but luckly that was reversed.
There's a small, new Indonesian commercial airline already using 3 COMAC planes in their fleet
If I were Airbus and Boeing I wouldn't worry about the C919, but I might worry about its successor.
I can see some African countries which rely heavily on Chinese investment (or debt traps, depending on your perspective) buying some COMAC planes as well. But North Korea can't buy them because they contain too many Western components.
@@zombiedodge1426the combined gdp of all African countries is similar to France. While it is a giant market, it is also a poor market.
Oh how you could change the fortunes of manufacturing in the UK by going back in time and telling de Havilland to use round windows
True. But we still probably would have buggered it up in the 70s, like we did our car industry.
@@philallen7626 Ay, as with the TSR-2 we've had hobbled our success to please the US!
Everyone seems to underestimate how deep Boeing's connection go. It is unlikely that Boeing will lose major share even with this much hassle. Short term yes, they'll go through immense trouble but long term they'll fix everything up and be back to square one.
there is one more aircraft manufacturer that has the know-how, resources and is building commercial jets right now, but russia's united aircraft corporation is definitely not going to expand into western markets to challenge airbus any time soon.
The CSeries was (and sort of still is) the greatest airplane ever made by Canada. And that includes the Avro Arrow. Unlike the Arrow which was quite comparable to its contemporary fighters, the CSeries was genuinely a cutting edge, modern airliner that outclassed the 737MAX-7 and Airbus A319neo.
While the program saw some limited success under Bombardier, it has been incredibly successful under Airbus. They just cannot build them fast enough to meet demand.
I know you're a rich British ponce, but as a rich British ponce myself who lives near Hatfield, it's de-HAVE-illand, not de-HALVE-illand
And it's "bom bar DI-ER"
Oh, I was taught it as de-Halve-iland rather than the former.
@@Weaselszone that extra letter incompletes the name by 50%
It's so frustrating that people suggest that BYD is "competing." If an entire country is essentially subsidizing all your expenses - hundreds of billions of them - that's not competition.
This duopoly needs to be broken. You cannot regulate an industry when there are just two players. Regulators play footsie with the company executives for after jobs. And governments don't want to piss them off, because they are a behemoth.
The most obvious benefit might just be the price apart from a whole load of newer models.
The problem is the costs of developing aircraft. These aircraft require tons of money to be pumped in, money that would-be competitors just don’t have. It’s the reason why all competitors are focusing on smaller aircraft, because they couldn’t possibly afford to develop an aircraft themselves the size of the 777 or A330, only the CR929 developed jointly by China and Russia is near that size. Airbus and Boeing wouldn’t be able to survive if they were smaller, they just wouldn’t able to afford development costs of large aircraft. It’s an industry where the starting costs are just so massive.
@@DruidHark it's not jointly developed anymore. China is building that plane on their own.
Embraer
only thing crazier than flying on a boeing plane is flying on a comac plane
Bombadeer typically refers to a person who operates or provides support for bomb-dropping aircraft in military operations.
With China being such a huge market for airplanes and most of its airliners being state owned/controlled it’s a matter of time for COMAC (also state owned/controlled) to become one of the biggest plane manufacturer.
Ah, I was waiting for the inevitable COMAC story.
They have delivered a full 24 aircrafts in the past 12 months. (Airbus is delivered something around 750, I cannot be bothered to look it up)
A nice, carefully balanced segment. Warmest compliments.
There's also the Irkut MC-21 from Russia, a 737/A320-sized jet which was just about ready to come onto the market before Putin decided invading Ukraine was a higher priority. They're working on a "Russification" plan to replace sanctioned Western components and might be able to sell a few to Iran, North Korea, and other sanctioned and/or Russian client states.
After the Superjet fiasco it's unlikely they would have sold any to Western airlines, but now we'll never know. (The Superjet is also undergoing "Russification," though I've also read the program was sold to a UAE-based company so who even knows what's going on with it.)
Comac’s C919 will not be purchased by foreign airline companies for a while.
If Comac suffered any aircraft accidents then the Chinese Aviation Safety Board will have to be deployed to investigate their domestic airplane’s accident scene.
Since many nations fear espionage from China, having Chinese government agents inside their borders to investigate a Comac accident will be risky in their view.
But I can see Embraer being a third airplane maker in an aerospace trio-poly.
My airbus stocks bought 2 weeks ago are enjoying this video
Fun Fact: US Gov forced CFM to only provide Comac the inferior version of their LEAP engine (LEAP-1C), while Boeing and Airbus enjoys the much more advanced LEAP-1A and B. This is the reason behind its worse operating economics.
not sure...but....Boeing can break Boeing
I'd say there are two outcomes:
1) The air industry completely collapses
OR
2) China invests in Embraer to build bigger planes, to muscle their way into Western markets
Chinese companies always produce for the domestic market at first. After they meet the demands of the market and gain adequate experience, these companies begin to look for other markets. We have witnessed these scenarios in consumer electronics and electric vehicle industries. Even if it will take a lot of time, Comac will eventually be an important player in aerospace industry.
they can try, they should expect the wheigh of lawfare/regulatory agencies thrown unto them for good measure
John oliver does a pretty good piece on boeing btw
Bom-bar-di[-]er (mid-high-[mid]-low)
Please make more business videos ❤❤❤
No, the fundamental issue is government meddling. Just look at how US government is treating the likes of Intel and Boeing.
its not that the cost is so high its that boeing never let bombardier get a return on its investment
More planes on a market, more completion, cheaper for consumer. Completion is good.
The costs of developing new aircraft are just simply so massive that only Boeing and Airbus can hope to afford to develop them. It’s why Bombardier almost went broke developing the C Series.
A kodak moment. Please take your last picture in films
... call it Dirtypoly, low quality for quantity.
Question. Could Airbus not seize the opportunity to take a monopoly?
If planes were simpler they probably could.
But nobody predicted the sheer size of Boeings screw-ups. And you can't scale the production of big-ahh jets overnight. The supply chain is huge for that. Though production is increasing since Airbus A320 neo now have a backlog of a decade or something.
I think you mean to say halt the production of the 737. 777 and 787. THe 767 is dead program
Boeing still manufactures the 767. It’s not ending production until 2027.
@@JB-yl4om Cargo only, though.
@@zombiedodge1426 Yes, but they’re still making 767s, it’s not dead.
Why can’t airbus just absorb the market share of Boeing
I very much doubt the US or the EU will ever allow the chinese jets to fly on their territory.
What sort of ungodly witch did Boeing offend for them to get an unending stream of excrement level luck their way?
Airbus
Boeing
Comac
ABC
i think boeing is going to break the duopoly
EMBRAER mentioned! F..K Bombardier Lol
Its turning into a monopoly giving Boeings rubbish performance.
Embraer or someone else needs to step into the ring
7-7-7 =Triple bro. Please get it right
No
No they can't
AIRBUS have an excellent product range (better and deeper than Boeing) and make very good aircraft - their supply chain problems are not of their own making and they have no substantial quality problems. Embraer indeed have an opportunity to expand due to the very long delivery times of Boeing and Airbus. Comac is politically a o non-starter other than the Chinese areas of influence. As i would never buy a chinese car people will be wary of buying chinese aircraft for valid political reasons. Boeing is a sad case of people selling out to the stock market and not focusing on their once exemplary engineering skills. I believe they cannot continue as they are currently structured and will certainly be re-organised and perhaps broken down into much more effective parts. It will take time but they will come back. A huge market is foreseen for the coming 20 years but no contender can overtake Boeing or AIRBUS.
Tofu dregs Chinese planes? No thanks. I only fly Airbus
Embraer
Boeing did not invent jet travel in the 50's do your history properly
They didn't invent it but the 707 (with an assist from the Douglas DC-8) really brought jet travel to the masses. The De Haviland Comet never recovered from its initial crashes, and the Soviet Tu-104 was a noisy and uncomfortable converted military plane with a poor safety record in its own right.
@@zombiedodge1426very true
The question put forth by the video title was never answered. Down vote.
BomBaDeer
Those Chinese aircraft are a real threat to Airbus and Boeing.
Clearly none of the established European or North American airlines would want any Chinese aircraft on their fleet, which is where budget airlines come in.
When a budget airliner can run a service cheaper because they use a cheaper aircraft then that will make that Chinese airplane an major threat.
Most people who fly don't have any clue about the airplane they are flying on, even if 10% cared that isn't going to stop the Chinese.
The Chinese aircraft will be interesting, probably not in Europe but in Africa and parts of South East Asia. If they get the support network right...
Are you paid by China?
What about Soviet airliners during the Cold War?
1 view bro fell off
Just keep ignoring the fossil fueled climate and biodiversity collapse
They’re not.
I had to stop watching this at 3:45. This is one of thoe worst videos for fact checking and pronounciation I've ever seen on this channel. Thumbs down.
China.
CHINA!
It's ok we will get a Airbus Monopoly 👀
Aweee TLDR cuties skipping the Boeing deaths completely 🥹
Language is a powerful yet subtle tool of manipulation.. when you call it a "threat to the duopoly" you are basically implying the duopoly needs to be protected... "Credible challange" is when you wanna support the breaking of duopoly...but well you know why you do that
Boeing is NOT dying, although it is rather sick. However it is likely to recover... eventually.
Fr that's disgusting they deliver the analysis/news like everything was alright with Boeing until the door fell off. Don't the lives of the people outside the US matter or what?!!
Oh it's ok for two airplanes to crash killing hundreds even if the company is ours as long as they are not our people it's all good that's what it sounded like to me.
@@Dave_SissonI think they meant skipping the 737 max crashes