Laminar Flow, Turbulent Flow and Reynolds Number (Lesson 3, Part 2)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 46

  • @fluidsexplained1901
    @fluidsexplained1901  2 роки тому +1

    Check out new content on this channel about the flume I built in my office:
    ua-cam.com/video/sppaBqpIT-w/v-deo.html

  • @grahamhagerty8648
    @grahamhagerty8648 Рік тому

    This series cements the fundamentals in a way I could now fully explain the processes to my family. That is ultimately the level of understanding we all strive for! Thanks again.

  • @Kumar-bv3od
    @Kumar-bv3od 2 роки тому +2

    You're amazing... Most underrated channel😮‍💨

  • @tutstorial8474
    @tutstorial8474 3 роки тому +3

    this channel is so underrated

    • @fluidsexplained1901
      @fluidsexplained1901  3 роки тому

      Thanks for the encouraging comment!

    • @tutstorial8474
      @tutstorial8474 3 роки тому

      Do a video on losses in pipes please🥺

    • @fluidsexplained1901
      @fluidsexplained1901  3 роки тому

      Hi@@tutstorial8474,
      I’ve already got a few videos up on losses in pipes, hope they are useful:
      ua-cam.com/video/6h1ZylIAyN8/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/zZ1yaJerGD0/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/YyR5IMj89Iw/v-deo.html

    • @tutstorial8474
      @tutstorial8474 3 роки тому

      oh I'm gonna check it, tnx 😁

    • @eshoallahrpothe6962
      @eshoallahrpothe6962 3 роки тому

      @Fluids explained..Plz...not given any link such this way.Bcz,your channel may be suspended anytime.So be careful.

  • @kylescofield
    @kylescofield 3 роки тому +3

    i love your fluid mech videos, super clean explanations. i hope you could make more videos on losses in pipes!

    • @fluidsexplained1901
      @fluidsexplained1901  3 роки тому

      Many thanks for the encouraging comment, very glad you enjoy them!

    • @sharemarketkoninja6929
      @sharemarketkoninja6929 2 роки тому

      Yeah these are type of explanation every students wanted in campus. I wonder how he can explain it with such clear insight. He must have read some special book.

  • @AtroXAir
    @AtroXAir Рік тому

    great video!!! great explanation. Amazing shots! Thank you!

  • @manmeetsidhu2894
    @manmeetsidhu2894 2 місяці тому

    thank you this was very helpful

  • @NOBOX7
    @NOBOX7 Рік тому +1

    The viscus force is cohesion quantified .
    Laminar flow is Cohesion in action caused by adhesion .
    Turbulent flow is adhesion in action caused by cohesion
    In the prior the cohesion is the dominant force
    in the latter it is dominated

  • @JasonHu-y7e
    @JasonHu-y7e Місяць тому

    Hi, I was wondering what the tubing you used for the dye injection was called and where you got the dye flow controller from?

  • @iamcivilengineer7410
    @iamcivilengineer7410 2 роки тому

    thanks for your effort mate.

  • @eshoallahrpothe6962
    @eshoallahrpothe6962 3 роки тому

    Masha-Allaah..good explanation!

  • @NOBOX7
    @NOBOX7 Рік тому

    Its really very simple , when adhesion over come cohesion the molecules of water loose that uniformity . The energy of the flow causes the molecules to follow erratic paths . Helium will not do this hens its super fluid properties .
    Laminar flow is cohesion in action caused by adhesion .
    Turbulent flow is adhesion in action caused by cohesion

  • @jhanolaer8286
    @jhanolaer8286 2 роки тому

    i want to simulate this kind of fluidflow but how😥

  • @peterswain3636
    @peterswain3636 2 роки тому

    Turbulence, the greatest unresolved puzzle in Physics. Einstein described the problem as intractable. He gave up trying to solve it. But it's ubiquitous in the universe.

    • @fluidsexplained1901
      @fluidsexplained1901  2 роки тому +1

      "When I meet God, I am going to ask him two questions: Why relativity? And why turbulence? I really believe he will have an answer for the first." Werner Heisenberg.

  • @Wildboy777
    @Wildboy777 2 роки тому

    thank you so much sir .

  • @Cowboy_Consultants
    @Cowboy_Consultants 3 роки тому

    Very informative

  • @rizkifitriad7006
    @rizkifitriad7006 2 роки тому +1

    Terimakasih ya pak

  • @AminRahimi-1
    @AminRahimi-1 2 роки тому

    thanks

  • @rizkifitriad7006
    @rizkifitriad7006 2 роки тому

    Saya menjadi pintar karenamelihqt video ini

  • @abdulalimhabib6872
    @abdulalimhabib6872 3 роки тому

    fastastic explain❤️❤️❤️

  • @phyarth8082
    @phyarth8082 6 місяців тому

    Make this experiment with very fine particle inkjet printer or in fair of science find dye that is exactly in size or water molecule and is not transparent, yes such particle don't exist but that is point of scientist Brownian motion 10^14 hz collisions observed pollen particles of flowers jiggles 1000 smaller paint (dye) particles of potassium permanganate jiggles faster mixing of layers is much faster, no stratification of layers of laminar flow exist.
    1:40 Your camera showing only 1/3 length of total pipe but even here you see that already intensity of dye are mixing, no even flow layers stratification. Not forget fact that water molecules compare to dye particles are 10000 times smaller, inject printer dye have smallest particle compare to water 1000 times bigger than individual water molecule. Take very long pipe and use see than no laminar flow exist. What you can see that Brownian mixing follows sinusoidal pattern Kármán vortex street. Of course which is behaviors of Brownian motion of mixing not flow regime of laminar or turbulent.
    Reject Brownian motion of molecules is rejecting all atomist model of matter, according to Reynolds flow is perfect layers of continuous flow that sometimes moves in vortices and eddies if flow is high (turbulent). And we stuck with this interpretation to this day.

  • @ondroed69
    @ondroed69 3 роки тому

    Reynold's number also has density in the numerator, unless you were talking specifically about water and S.G.=1. Otherwise great material!

    • @fluidsexplained1901
      @fluidsexplained1901  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks for the comment. I am using the version of Reynolds Number with Kinematic Viscosity, where Kinematic Viscosity = Absolute viscosity over Density, so the Density is there in my working, just hidden. This definition of Reynolds Number is exactly the same as (Density x diameter x velocity) over (Absolute viscosity). I find this version quicker to use, but it does sometimes cause confusion as the other version is probably more common. Hopefully that makes sense?

    • @ondroed69
      @ondroed69 2 роки тому

      @@fluidsexplained1901 it does now, thanks!

  • @bingosunnoon9341
    @bingosunnoon9341 3 роки тому

    You should get familiar with the difference between damp and dampen.

    • @fluidsexplained1901
      @fluidsexplained1901  2 роки тому

      Thanks for the feedback. There is always room for improvement but hopefully the science was ok :)