I fully agree to Zizeks proposals for a shift in democratic leadership from expert leaders to common sense leadership. What have we these days ? Lawyers and economically educated managers who judge The Real Demands of life on bases of their books, paragraphs and bookkeeping teachings. Also, not the best looking and best talking person should be on top, but someone also having a "heart" (sorry for romantic term). We need a radical shift of perspective regarding those who are steering the nation.
'There is one element where I agree with David Irving'- cue the organizers adopting 'Kirsten Dunst listening to Lars Von Trier 'I understand Hitler' press conference' expressions 😄. Even Slavoj was uncharacteristically quick to clarify (in a manner of speaking)...
Sir, they can't stamp your passport because it technically is not a legitimate state. In the same manner you can't get a "Palestinian" stamp on your passport.
Dasein IS NEVER an "authentic historical being." EVER! Husserl's "being" however... I never imagined such a terrible interpretation and misreading of Heidegger would upset me so much. And I'm a fan of the Zizter... 🤬🤬🤬
@@veronicarodriguez8094there never can be such thing as "authenticity", to begin with. All we can observe is an asymptotic congruence between words and deeds. That which the persona displays into the open is highly volatile within certain coordinates. No _authenticity_ in sight ever anywhere.
@@veronicarodriguez8094 you have your ideological downloads, I have mine. Linguistic turn, if this tells you something. If you're looking for confirmation of your ideology, feel free to stick to your bubble of information. AND, No, I won't read a single word of this man. No matter whatever he has to suggest, he went in conformity with one of the worst political systems imaginable so far. Plus he provided theoretical substrates for this abhorrent view on people. He shall roast in hell.
Slavoj is the goat. He knows he didn't just fall out of a coconut tree
😅
Young Helen Smith Michael Thompson Sarah
I fully agree to Zizeks proposals for a shift in democratic leadership from expert leaders to common sense leadership.
What have we these days ? Lawyers and economically educated managers who judge The Real Demands of life on bases of their books, paragraphs and bookkeeping teachings.
Also, not the best looking and best talking person should be on top, but someone also having a "heart" (sorry for romantic term).
We need a radical shift of perspective regarding those who are steering the nation.
'There is one element where I agree with David Irving'- cue the organizers adopting 'Kirsten Dunst listening to Lars Von Trier 'I understand Hitler' press conference' expressions 😄. Even Slavoj was uncharacteristically quick to clarify (in a manner of speaking)...
I was waiting for this, thank you again!!
Saluki Slavoj crossover
With a “filthy slav” thrown in 😂
Sir, they can't stamp your passport because it technically is not a legitimate state. In the same manner you can't get a "Palestinian" stamp on your passport.
Dear Sir,
Could you also please read the Heidegger quote from a Husserlian perspective of pure phenomenology.
Kindly appreciated.
Dasein IS NEVER an "authentic historical being." EVER! Husserl's "being" however...
I never imagined such a terrible interpretation and misreading of Heidegger would upset me so much.
And I'm a fan of the Zizter...
🤬🤬🤬
@@veronicarodriguez8094there never can be such thing as "authenticity", to begin with. All we can observe is an asymptotic congruence between words and deeds.
That which the persona displays into the open is highly volatile within certain coordinates. No _authenticity_ in sight ever anywhere.
@@farrider3339
Please read and understand Heidegger before you speak, please.
@@veronicarodriguez8094 you have your ideological downloads, I have mine. Linguistic turn, if this tells you something. If you're looking for confirmation of your ideology, feel free to stick to your bubble of information. AND, No, I won't read a single word of this man. No matter whatever he has to suggest, he went in conformity with one of the worst political systems imaginable so far. Plus he provided theoretical substrates for this abhorrent view on people. He shall roast in hell.
Slavoj is a mess even for Slavoj here.
how so