New Research Paper on Quantum Mechanics and Relativity - Post Quantum Gravity Theory.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
  • A new research paper has manage to link quantum mechanics and relativity together. It is called Post quantum gravity it takes the uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics and gives the same uncertain or random aspect to gravity. It says that this randomness is a starting point and is a fundamental ingredient. By doing this they can formulate one mathematic model for both types of randomness.
    I will places links below to these research papers.
    Post-quantum gravity is very interesting, but it only gives us a mathematical interpretation of what is actually happening.
    The theory explained in these videos gives us an objective geometrical understanding that the mathematics is based upon.
    We do indeed have a starting point, it is formed by light photons ∆E=hf interacting with the electron probability cloud that surrounds the nucleus of each atom.
    Someone within a gravitational field in freefall will experience the randomness of quantum mechanics as a probabilistic uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π future. That is coming into existence with each photon electron coupling or dipole moment.
    In this theory the mathematics of quantum mechanics represents the physics of time, with classical physics representing processes over a ‘period of time’ as in Newton’s differential equations.
    Light photon ∆E=hf energy continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons. Kinetic energy is the energy of what is actually ‘happening’ as a probabilistic uncertain future unfolds.
    This forms ‘the starting point’ of a probabilistic uncertain future
    The wave particle duality of light and matter in the form of electrons is forming a blank canvas that we, as atoms, can interact with relative to the energy and momentum of our actions.
    This process is relative to the Planck constant h/2π of action.
    Reference Papers here:
    journals.aps.o...
    www.nature.com...
    New theory seeks to unite Einstein’s gravity with quantum mechanics
    4 December 2023
    www.ucl.ac.uk/...
    String Theory gets Competition: A New Attempt to Solve Physics' Biggest Mystery
    • String Theory gets Com...
    New Idea Solves Three Physics Mysteries at Once: Post Quantum Gravity
    • New Idea Solves Three ...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @JJDigitalartStudio
    @JJDigitalartStudio 6 місяців тому +7

    I love physics. Particle and all kinds of math but quantum physics is where God lives. Space does not move. Things in space move. Sometimes they crash into one another which sets off a chain of events that can either destroy or build something else new. Have a great week.

  • @Firestorm1243
    @Firestorm1243 6 місяців тому +2

    Why do photos act differently when they are observed ?

    • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
      @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time  6 місяців тому +3

      In this theory it is because he future is unfolding photon by photon within the reference frame of each experiment. The wave particle duality of light and matter in the form of electrons are forming a blank canvas that we, as atoms, can interact with this process forming a future relative to our actions. Within this process, the Planck Constant h/2π is a constant of action in the dynamic of three-dimensional space with one variable in the form of time ∆t.

    • @Firestorm1243
      @Firestorm1243 6 місяців тому +1

      @@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time i understand what you are saying. I think everyone reaches the same conclusion but in different ways. For me it was Walter Russell

    • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
      @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time  6 місяців тому

      @@Firestorm1243 I like his work, but this theory was formulated based of Quantum Mechanics.

  • @adammcgregor-d3y
    @adammcgregor-d3y 6 місяців тому +2

    Gibberish.

    • @henrikburman218
      @henrikburman218 6 місяців тому

      Right, holy trolly.. >Shit like these vids rises my blood pressure

    • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
      @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time  6 місяців тому

      We have a probabilistic uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π future coming into existence with the absorption and emission of light with potential energy PE continuously transformed into kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of electrons as an uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π future comes into existence with each photon ∆E=hf electron interaction. Gibberish?

    • @adammcgregor-d3y
      @adammcgregor-d3y 6 місяців тому

      The attempt to find commonality between gravity and the other influences, depends on an actual measured uncertainty of the graviton's momentum, as opposed to position. Has that been observed? In simple English, your uncertain gravitational future is not uncertain in the macro. You still curve quite predictably through spacetime according to classical relativity; which is why we have not been able to merge gravity with the other four influences. I suspect that spacetime has to be quantized, That it is spacetime which is uncertain. Once that is established, then we can safely suggest uncertainty for gravity, as we cannot measure both position and momentum of a graviton as it refracts through a possibly discrete field of individual bits. That would be the same principle for your photon, BTW. What that common principle is, we have not observed either, so it is a pure speculation that gravity "bends" light as a result of spacetime uncertainty. But if it does, then what does that do for your interpretation? It still does not explain mass' effect on the curvature imposed. Hence, gibberish. @@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time

    • @adammcgregor-d3y
      @adammcgregor-d3y 6 місяців тому

      Correction: three influences. Not four + gravity; It is in order; gravity + weak, electromagnetic, and strong. The standard model is a good mathematical fit for what physicists observe for weak, electromagnetic and strong at the microscale. Gravity has not been "measured/observed" at the same scale (Planck length) because to run those observations directly requires so much energy that the experimenters would create curved spacetime that results .in black holes at those Planck scales. Until someone can devise an explanation that makes a prediction verified by accessible observation, (Like the rotating galaxy observations, which forms part of the rationale for dark matter.), there is only mathematical conjecture. It is the string theory debacle all over again.
      Gibberish.