My question is that why the retrofitted building is on that side of hummer which may absorb less amount of energy and seismic loads, in contrary the non retrofitted building is near the hummer and of-course more seismic load will apply on it. I wish this test was done unbiasedly and the same seismic loads were applied in both buildings. (correct me if I am wrong)
The table should have been hammered from both sides so that both buildings are subjected to a similar shocking wave. Here unretrofitted building has absorbed more energy. Just a curiosity, I'm not doubting the experiment btw😀
My question is that why the retrofitted building is on that side of hummer which may absorb less amount of energy and seismic loads, in contrary the non retrofitted building is near the hummer and of-course more seismic load will apply on it. I wish this test was done unbiasedly and the same seismic loads were applied in both buildings. (correct me if I am wrong)
My first thought
I also thought so..
From here in the States we say excellent work and thanks for sharing! The very best of luck to you!
Very interesting and very well explained.
Very very enriching video
Wonderful! Thanks for putting it out.
The table should have been hammered from both sides so that both buildings are subjected to a similar shocking wave. Here unretrofitted building has absorbed more energy. Just a curiosity, I'm not doubting the experiment btw😀