@@classified150 James Webb had almost reached its first launch date when construction began at the Berlin airport. James Webb has been overdue for 13 years now, while Berlin is only 9 years late.
You are now invited to the dimension human conversion meeting in Saturn in Galaxy 2334. Could you please bring a bag of cat powder with you when you come to the meeting? If possible, bring Xavier The 924th in the one foot long sub made in Pluto. Thank you. (HJ) P.S. Were you part of the police committee for the cow injection project? Have a coke day!
Miles Scarbrough others countries are smart, why spend billions and billions on the army when you have the yanks doing it for you? Instead use that money to provide free healthcare, good public services, good educations.
8:57 From what I can gather, the US and USSR have succesfully tested anti-satellite missiles as early as the 1960s, 70s and 80s. It's completely false to state it was the first test of its kind.
From what I understand, the difference between those anti-satellite missile tests was that they were used against targets low enough in orbit for the debris to burn up soon after, as opposed to remaining in orbit as the Chinese test has caused.
Technically South Africa is the space king. So many of the scientists in NASA are South African. And even big companies were started by South Africans, like Elon Musk.
I think this video is missing one super important thing and that is a talk about reusability. Especially when the video is about future of space exploration.
"No single country owns anything in space" "But what if we... let a few super rich individuals own stuff in space" "Cant see how anything bad can come of that, sure!"
I think that any self sufficient Lunar or Martian colony will likely seek to become its own nation once it is large enough. Because of this it may be possible to have a Martian Empire attack Earth and attempt to take control of it.
Actually, the first anti-satellite weapon tests were done by the USSR and USA during the cold war. The USSR had their first successful test in the 70s and the US in the 80s. The US has actually shot down two satellites thus far, once in 1985 and a second time in 2008.
A lot of people realise that. That's why the ESA is designing systems to remove space junk, and many (possibly all, idk for sure) new sattilites being launched/designed for low earth orbit have mechanisms to bring them down into the atmosphere to burn up after their lifespan is reached.
Nice video. Interesting topic, solid quality. 'subbed Your last part on space debris is missing a few key factors though. First of all, the lower the orbit, the more atmospheric drag. Below a certain hight, debris isn't a problem, because it will fall back to earth in a few weeks or at worst a year. Very low flying satellite constellations such as Starlink actually require ion thrusters to keep their altitude. If a bird suddenly dies, the engines shut down as well, which means that the debris issue solves itself. Also, private space is introducing a lot of new ideas to prevent debris (such as non-explosive staging), because they are being watched very closely (and they should). Ironically, they've progressed so far, that the military and the government are the ones causing the most issues, due to old processes. So even though the new constellations have so many birds they are very unlikely to cause much debris, compared to anti-sat weapons by military organizations. Heck, even spy and comsats at geostationary orbits are more troublesome at this point. They are so high up, that it would take 1000 years for them to deorbit. They'll fall apart into clouds of shrapnel much sooner. Btw, I know how much clickbait is out there regarding Starlink. It's surprisingly hard to get reliable sources on space stuff ; )
I'm still skeptical that the SLS will ever get a chance to fly. At the current schedule, it looks like SpaceX's starship will be ready before SLS, and then SLS will be completely pointless.
@@praveenneevarp4822 Honestly, I think it'll be a tight time difference. Not sure who'll pass the finish line first. SpaceX has a running history of crazy fast development, but the SLS has been in the works for much longer. But SLS was originally supposed to be completed in 2017, and now it's 3 years after that. So who really knows.
I believe space travel will be more of an undustrial type setting. Crio sleeping to reach vast distances. If anyone remembers /seen the alien movie franchise. It will be more like that. Nothing like star trek.
I thumb downed this video because given the topic from the title, it blatantly ignored Starship. That's ridiculous because Starship itself is likely to be the biggest factor in space exploration in the coming decade, but no mention. Bleeping SLS gets a shout out, but not Starship. I can't help but think that was on purpose, but by not doing so it pretty much invalidates this whole video making it pointless. I'm not saying that others won't contribute, but no mention at all? Smh.
@@Seastallion Totally agreed and its not like Starship hasnt had any media coveradge or attention im sure it is way more "famous" project than the SLS at this point.
Talks about landing on the moon and then proceeds to say nobody has gone further into space than the ISS. The moon is a tiny bit further than Des Moines to Chicago lol
but you forget that the European nations don't have a space agency per nation, the ESA is the space agency for most European nations, so the ESA should be second instead of China
I hope they come up with a plan on how to clean up the debris around our planet's surface. Seems really irresponsible to just let all that stuff float around.
Adding all of the satellites actually isn’t an issue, there is an incredibly low chance of hitting one. Earth’s atmosphere is huge, it’s basically saying the same thing as, if there are 8,000 boats all dividing out in every lake and ocean, it will be impossible to sail anywhere because there are so many boats. Except the “surface area” of our lower atmosphere is twice as big as earth. So yeah, we are good
How does the fact that we have never had this amount of space debris before interfere with Musk's plan of 12.000 more satellites? Or is it going to be only on low-earth orbit while the debris is basically revolve on higher orbits?
This rocky earth itself is a giant rocket, travelling ever closer to the center of the galaxy, if you don't know, our entire solar system is spiraling towards the center of the milkyway
Theory. So you know how the world superpowers sent out ships and made colonies and etc. Now most of those countries aren't super powers anymore. What is all the countries sending out space ships have the same fate and future people on Mars or something become the superpower. Doubtful but it crossed my mind.
Living in space vehicles has been proven detrimental to human physiology. A one year trip to Mars and back may be near suicidal. Beside that, designing a huge vehicle to bring oxygen, food and water there and back will be a major engineering project costing billions of dollars.
Spacex is building just such a vehicle to travel to Mars and vastly reduce the cost to orbit. The Starship prototype might fly this month or next month. Spacex expect to earn tens of billions a year their Starlink broadband constellation and to use that money to find a colony on Mars.
I feel like more sattelites will be designed with shorter lifespans and moved to lower orbits as the cost of entry to space is driven down. This will hopefully cut down on debris as the sattelites will burn up as they deorbit
if the Transportaion industry, space industry and the top 5 biggest industries teamed up with funding, resources and manpower with the 10 richest people on earth, i project this all to happen in half the time or faster and we can expect humans on titan before 2075
I hope in the future people can live in space and other planets for free I dont know maybe where all dead at the time when that happens i bet it happens sometime in the late 2900's or in the early 3000's
Next 10 years: 50/50 chance of launching the James Webb Telescope.
Do you mean next 20 years ?
Hopefully 2021
I want better odds
How come JWST became the same level on BER airport
@@classified150 James Webb had almost reached its first launch date when construction began at the Berlin airport. James Webb has been overdue for 13 years now, while Berlin is only 9 years late.
2070: "Here's how we're gonna return to the moon again."
:C
That’s a dark timeline
You are now invited to the dimension human conversion meeting in Saturn in Galaxy 2334. Could you please bring a bag of cat powder with you when you come to the meeting? If possible, bring Xavier The 924th in the one foot long sub made in Pluto. Thank you. (HJ)
P.S. Were you part of the police committee for the cow injection project? Have a coke day!
@Anant Tiwari well they are doing it but the private companies are making the technology
Please don’t depress me
0:09 Apollo 11 landed on the moon on July 20. It launched from Earth on July 16.
I'm glad someone else noticed.
That's a good point. I put the launch date. Eeeek! Hopefully you can forgive me.
@@reallifelore2174 you are forgiven.
gross
Big salute to Apollo 11.
That USA space funding in comparison to everyone else is the most American chart I've seen
Miles Scarbrough check out US military spending compared to the rest of the world. It is even more lopsided.
@@brianmallis2666 Someone's gotta compensate for our weak allies....aaand it's us
Miles Scarbrough others countries are smart, why spend billions and billions on the army when you have the yanks doing it for you? Instead use that money to provide free healthcare, good public services, good educations.
@DawhnEnchant Have you met Denmark? Uneducated AF lol
@DawhnEnchant of course it works, look at all of western Europe.
8:57 From what I can gather, the US and USSR have succesfully tested anti-satellite missiles as early as the 1960s, 70s and 80s. It's completely false to state it was the first test of its kind.
Exactly
Exactly Correct
I mean a quick wiki search would have provided that information.
I was going to say that as well. The first sucessfull documented test was made in 13 September 1985 by an ASM-135 launched from an USAF F-15!
From what I understand, the difference between those anti-satellite missile tests was that they were used against targets low enough in orbit for the debris to burn up soon after, as opposed to remaining in orbit as the Chinese test has caused.
I wish we here in America would swap our NASA budget with our military budget
I wish it too
If that happened Russia would dominate Europe, so much for LGBT rights.
meee tooooo. I think the army and all the wars is just a waste of resources.
The world is ruled by wrong people.
Swap? Nah. Good way to get us killed 🤣 could def take a good chunk out of it though and still have the best military on earth
Flat earthers: NASA is lying and everything is fake!
China: Am I a joke to you?
What?
People are educating themselves, and your Facebook meme brain is a drain. Go away.
@@supersaiyanzero386 👏👏👏👏👏👍
THAT WAS BRILLIANT LMAO MADE MY DAY
True
The lunar gateway, or as some are calling it "The Lunar Tollbooth"
4:44 That's one big launch vehicle...
Lives up to its name, huh? 😂😂
Technically South Africa is the space king. So many of the scientists in NASA are South African. And even big companies were started by South Africans, like Elon Musk.
i litterally just discovered this channel XD
Me too
Me too
Omg literally
Same
Me 5
Your completely ignored Rocket Lab who has put more things in space than Virgin or Blue Origin.
It should have been spaceX arianeEspace ULA and rocketlab
I think this video is missing one super important thing and that is a talk about reusability. Especially when the video is about future of space exploration.
A super heavy lift fully reusable rocket will be a paradigm shift and one such rocket is in development right now.
SPACEX :)
Viewing advice: Video playback speed on x1.25
also true for every non-music UA-cam video ever made
Tweeker
I’d say x1.5 is better
I did the same. He talks so slow that he just sounds like he's talking normally at x1.25
gotta make the video 10 minutes!
I find it sad that I'll never be alive by the time we start to expand to the point that entire countries will own planets.
GLITCH_Trout
Well we may have nanobots that allow us to become immortal in the next decade.
So it could be possible to see all of this and more.
All I hear when you say Chang'e is Chungus. And then thoughts of SMG4.
Fun fact The Project Artemis Rocket will have 4 space-shuttle engines on it.
Which is kind of sad, since those engines were made to be reusable, but each SLS launch will be their last.
"No single country owns anything in space"
"But what if we... let a few super rich individuals own stuff in space"
"Cant see how anything bad can come of that, sure!"
Another Starlink launching in the next 24 hours.
It was so cool
Yeah.
i think ISRO would be the leading space agency of next decade
In the next 20 years: "ayy yoo whats poppin guys today we're gonna vlog on the moon!!!"
I think that any self sufficient Lunar or Martian colony will likely seek to become its own nation once it is large enough. Because of this it may be possible to have a Martian Empire attack Earth and attempt to take control of it.
**COUGH COUGH** CoD: Infinite Warfare **COUGH COUGH**
It's possible but that would take decades because how long it will take for a decent population.
You forgot arguably the most important part: SpaceX's Starship development and their plans for manned missions to Mars in this decade.
Actually, the first anti-satellite weapon tests were done by the USSR and USA during the cold war. The USSR had their first successful test in the 70s and the US in the 80s. The US has actually shot down two satellites thus far, once in 1985 and a second time in 2008.
This man really just pronounced Chang’e like ‘Chung-uh’
Big chang'e
Or Change 😉
Good thing China didn’t make it to the moon first lol. Apollo sound way cooler then chunga
he is pronouncing it incorrectly
B I G C H U N G U S
anyone else remember when it was funny? Now it ain’t...
@@gamingchamp6728 Big chungus appeared in 1941 meaning there's a chance that Hitler saw big chungus
@Keanu Threeves I prefer a Greek god more than a women had took immortality pills
"Bombarding space with more robotic probes than you can count". How high do you think most people can count?
rthomp03 it’s an expression
Where's Zambia on this? I thought they wanted to establish a village with a church on the moon...
Edit: I changed Zimbabwe with Zambia as a correction
Gay
lmao.
🇿🇲. Well, idk why my country did that all those years ago..
they will do it. they know the way.
God does not exist. Man made fictional books to give poor people hope. Give up on the idea
Just realised that man first took flight in 1903. In less that 70 years, we were on the moon.....
I find it quite alarming that so much stuff is orbiting earth. It will ruin ground based astronomy if they don't keep it under control.
Actually, the first destructive anti-satellite test was performed by the US in 1982.
I would like to add that the starlink satellites have a decommissioning protocol to reduce the amount of space debris they make
"chunguh" 2:53
Does anyone realize that by overcrowding the orbit we’re just sentencing ourselves to a trap of debris?
A lot of people realise that. That's why the ESA is designing systems to remove space junk, and many (possibly all, idk for sure) new sattilites being launched/designed for low earth orbit have mechanisms to bring them down into the atmosphere to burn up after their lifespan is reached.
Most launches since the 2010-2000s have had systems to deorbit the spacecrafy from orbit
1:12
Boeing : *are you challenging me?!?*
I am from the year 2029. I can confirm that it will be a lot more than a decade to achieve this kind of space travel.
Reallifelore2 is WAYYY BETTER THAN HIS FIRST ONE!! ALL THESE VIDEOS ARE AMAZING
Yea I didn't wanna say it, but RLL1 is way more sensational while this actually seems to try to be educational
Nice video. Interesting topic, solid quality. 'subbed
Your last part on space debris is missing a few key factors though. First of all, the lower the orbit, the more atmospheric drag. Below a certain hight, debris isn't a problem, because it will fall back to earth in a few weeks or at worst a year. Very low flying satellite constellations such as Starlink actually require ion thrusters to keep their altitude. If a bird suddenly dies, the engines shut down as well, which means that the debris issue solves itself.
Also, private space is introducing a lot of new ideas to prevent debris (such as non-explosive staging), because they are being watched very closely (and they should). Ironically, they've progressed so far, that the military and the government are the ones causing the most issues, due to old processes.
So even though the new constellations have so many birds they are very unlikely to cause much debris, compared to anti-sat weapons by military organizations. Heck, even spy and comsats at geostationary orbits are more troublesome at this point. They are so high up, that it would take 1000 years for them to deorbit. They'll fall apart into clouds of shrapnel much sooner.
Btw, I know how much clickbait is out there regarding Starlink. It's surprisingly hard to get reliable sources on space stuff ; )
THERES A REAL LIFE LORE 2?! YES!!!!!!
Don't even live in space yet and it's already polluted. also dump it on a planet
We’ve lived in space for about 18 years?
If you know shit about space travel you would realize its barely polluted. Only geostationary is semi polluted.
I suppose we could dump it into thee sun and burn it, as long as it doesn't mess up the effects of sun.
@@honkhonk8009 um there's space junk from the people that works and lives there. Dip shit
@@aurathedraak7909 hes talking about space not earths orbit
"this year blue origin is expected to launch turists to space"
me (in 2020) : jajajaja
RRL: China's emerging space power has all been made possible by...
Me: SKILLSHARE!!
RRL: the steady increase in spending
Me: Oh ...
I'm still skeptical that the SLS will ever get a chance to fly. At the current schedule, it looks like SpaceX's starship will be ready before SLS, and then SLS will be completely pointless.
But isn't the sls in its final testing stage while starship has a lot of tests to do?
@@praveenneevarp4822 Honestly, I think it'll be a tight time difference. Not sure who'll pass the finish line first. SpaceX has a running history of crazy fast development, but the SLS has been in the works for much longer. But SLS was originally supposed to be completed in 2017, and now it's 3 years after that. So who really knows.
4:51 The SLS isn't docking with the Gateway, the Orion capsule is lmaoo
Yeah my heart kind of sunk to see how people think space is so easy!
I believe space travel will be more of an undustrial type setting. Crio sleeping to reach vast distances. If anyone remembers /seen the alien movie franchise. It will be more like that. Nothing like star trek.
Who just watched the SpaceX launch?
I hope breakthrough starshot happens cus I wanna see a planet in a habitable zone in another solar system
Proxima Centauri B would be a good place. Only problem is the irradiation..
Mans was talking in the same melody the whole time
Should I sub to both channels?
Seems like a good idea to me.
Ok, thx:)
Yes
Ok:)
Rocket lab New Zealand represent!
SLS is going to get scrapped its 2 billion per launch! Meanwhile starship is going to be 2-5 million.
I thumb downed this video because given the topic from the title, it blatantly ignored Starship. That's ridiculous because Starship itself is likely to be the biggest factor in space exploration in the coming decade, but no mention. Bleeping SLS gets a shout out, but not Starship. I can't help but think that was on purpose, but by not doing so it pretty much invalidates this whole video making it pointless. I'm not saying that others won't contribute, but no mention at all? Smh.
@@Seastallion Totally agreed and its not like Starship hasnt had any media coveradge or attention im sure it is way more "famous" project than the SLS at this point.
RealLifeLore2 What do you use to edit these videos? Just curious
Centauri A davinci resolve
U guys are forgetting about NZ who has its own space company called rocket lab. They send budget rockets and satellites into space.
Talks about landing on the moon and then proceeds to say nobody has gone further into space than the ISS. The moon is a tiny bit further than Des Moines to Chicago lol
That was an unmanned lander. No human has ventured out past that.
flatbg1 He said since 1972 and he’s correct. No one has went very far out since the last Apollo mission.
He said on average
Great video. Loved it.
Yeah they don‘t even let you leave your house. Not to mention the planet. The next decade will be one of reconsidering power and government reach.
What Frick you need more subs
;)
4:05 "aughlso" He sounded like that pufferfish eating a carrot
What if Neil Armstrong had said heehee while moonwalking?
China seriously calls their landers CHUNGUS
That name dont have literally nothing in common with chungus you know.
It's Chung e ( Chung a) not Chung gus
That if we survived this Corona outbreak
Anyone else have to watch this for science?
but you forget that the European nations don't have a space agency per nation, the ESA is the space agency for most European nations, so the ESA should be second instead of China
I hope they come up with a plan on how to clean up the debris around our planet's surface. Seems really irresponsible to just let all that stuff float around.
Says private sector. Mentions spacex and 2 suborbital tourist tides. Um missing a few others that launch cube sats
Hey, the Earth he used doesn't have Greenland or the British isles
Adding all of the satellites actually isn’t an issue, there is an incredibly low chance of hitting one. Earth’s atmosphere is huge, it’s basically saying the same thing as, if there are 8,000 boats all dividing out in every lake and ocean, it will be impossible to sail anywhere because there are so many boats. Except the “surface area” of our lower atmosphere is twice as big as earth. So yeah, we are good
3:37 is made possible to curiosity stream.
Space exploration is good for science and for people because give an opportunity for job
6:45 you forgot Rocket Lab
which has done a whole lot more than both Virgin Galactic and Blue Origin combines
He should of mentioned SpaceX
7:33 PM
11/9/2019
Happy John it’s only 7:01 pm dumb dumb 7;33 is in like 30 minutes
It's should HAVE not should of - lol.
How does the fact that we have never had this amount of space debris before interfere with Musk's plan of 12.000 more satellites? Or is it going to be only on low-earth orbit while the debris is basically revolve on higher orbits?
Anyone interested in space debris problem should watch Planetes
Who’s here after the channel announcement?
This rocky earth itself is a giant rocket, travelling ever closer to the center of the galaxy, if you don't know, our entire solar system is spiraling towards the center of the milkyway
happy 2020!
Next video what if all the military budget on the world goes to NASA
Umm people have been a lot farther out in space than the ISS like 248,655 miles away from earth surface
Yeah, but nobody has been that far since 1972 (which is what he said)
If you guys could make a video on how to possibly get rid of all the space debris and what it would take, would be sick as fuck.....thanks :)
Theory. So you know how the world superpowers sent out ships and made colonies and etc. Now most of those countries aren't super powers anymore. What is all the countries sending out space ships have the same fate and future people on Mars or something become the superpower. Doubtful but it crossed my mind.
That looks so cool I love this video 🤩🤩
7:42 the Japanese mogul gave a down payment to get a *free* trip?
Keep up your work . Can you give us a clear insight on whether humans landed on the moon or not?
They did in 1969,
@@AuxenceF And again in 1972.
Switch the vowel phonics on Chang'e for more accurate pronunciation.
In 1969, Apollo 11 went on the moon.
N I C E.
I'm excoited
Nice
Living in space vehicles has been proven detrimental to human physiology. A one year trip to Mars and back may be near suicidal. Beside that, designing a huge vehicle to bring oxygen, food and water there and back will be a major engineering project costing billions of dollars.
Spacex is building just such a vehicle to travel to Mars and vastly reduce the cost to orbit. The Starship prototype might fly this month or next month. Spacex expect to earn tens of billions a year their Starlink broadband constellation and to use that money to find a colony on Mars.
How can the atmosphere murder you
I feel like more sattelites will be designed with shorter lifespans and moved to lower orbits as the cost of entry to space is driven down. This will hopefully cut down on debris as the sattelites will burn up as they deorbit
Starlink basically?
9:41 Lol, I was thinking about Sputnik right before that
7:34 PM
11/9/2019
4:52 lol! No stage separation!
When are they gonna launch Big Chang'es?
if the Transportaion industry, space industry and the top 5 biggest industries teamed up with funding, resources and manpower with the 10 richest people on earth, i project this all to happen in half the time or faster and we can expect humans on titan before 2075
CREW DRAGON REACHED THE ISS YESTERDAY BOIS!
I hope that earth doesn't end like how it is in Wallie
I hope in the future people can live in space and other planets for free
I dont know maybe where all dead at the time when that happens i bet it happens sometime in the late 2900's or in the early 3000's
U r so good
There’s a hole in your screen 🕳
WRONG@10secs. They landed on the surface on July 20th not July 16th, He actually walked on July 21st
with how dirty our oceans are, whos to say we’d actually keep the vast emptiness of space completely clean
the future is here