Es algo triste como en latinoamerica o hispanoamerica no podemos vernos como un grupo unido que peuda hacerle frente a problemas externos, incluso en africa hablan de uniones, porque no podemos pensar en algo parecido
Nunca entendí tanta rivalidad entre México y Argentina. Lo único que medio lo justifica en mi experiencia es la fuerte presencia negativa de argentinos y mexicanos en las redes sociales que siempre llevan a que los ataquen por la nacionalidad.
It's a complete juxtaposition: Mexico was the only country on earth to publicly repudiate the Nazi occupation of Austria, but seemingly, you want us to believe that Mexico supports Argentine colonisation of the Falklands? That Mexico is simping for an Argentine Empire? I think it's silly and futile, if true, which is doubtful.
you returned!!! thanks for commenting. yes is it true,my country supports argentine claims on the islands. you can see president AMLO supporting argentine claims on the islands if you search spanish-language articles. now,what do you think of my video regarding ureta and isaac testimonies? do you consider it an goord counterargument to your claims?
@@infrestitucho8721 I have been away and very busy... I cannot fathom how Mexico - a country which has lost swathes of territory to the USA, and who was the only country on earth to protest Nazi Germany's annexation of Austria - can support ideals of illegal Imperialism / Colonialism today. Either way, they're backing a loser on this one. As to your video, I watched it some time ago, and I still don't buy it. The pilots' testimonies are full of holes and wishful thinking, and all evidence proves that they cannot be correct. I believe that after 42 years they may have convinced themselves that they are correct, but the fact remains that the difference between Isaac & Ureta and myself, is that I am the only one who has ever seen HMS Invincible: they have not. The theories and hypotheses to try to make their story fit are beyond sensational... they are ludicrous and unworkable. Not one person of any credibility in 42 years has been able to elevate this from a conspiracy theory into an actual topic of history... literally not one historian, when to do so, if it was the case, would mean a lot of money and lasting fame. I think that relying on internet weirdos like LVSI, Bortolotto and others, shows how daft the idea is. The only actual evidence is the say-so of the two men involved, who would be foolish to deny it after so long. I hope we agree there?
@@infrestitucho8721 I answered, but seemingly, it hasn't worked. My PC did a big update and was running slow... So firstly, yes, I have been away, working on a new project based in WW2, so not very active online. Secondly, the idea of Mexico - a country who stood alone in condemning the Nazi occupation of Austria and which itself has lost swathes of land to American Imperialism - condoning another people and their country being illegally owned against their will and against their human rights by a foreign power, only shows a lack of understanding or a disingenuous side. If they feel that way, they should protest the annexation of Texas et al in the UN, but they don't. Finally, I know I looked at the video of Isaac and Ureta, although I seem unable to find it now... the bottom line is, that they're wrong. Be it lying, wishful thinking, mistaken identity or a desire to maintain their status and not look foolish is, I guess irrelevant. Almost 3,000 members of the task force were present on board those ships on May 30th and every single one of them laughs at the idea. They actively ridicule it. Can two men - both who were in a position to gain by their claim, and who did gain materially in fame and fortune - overturn the experience of 3,000 men who were present, all of whom had nothing to gain, and who live in the most free speaking country in the world? - No. And the fact remains that not one of them has ever agreed with the Argentine version. The evidence shows that the attack was on HMS Avenger. Avenger's crew tried to recover the body of Omar Jesus Castillo less than a minute after the attack, and managed to recover his flight hood and respirator... this was over 21 miles away from Invincible. I've spoken to guys who were in the water at the time trying to see if Castillo was alive. It is therefore obvious that Avenger was attacked, and not Invincible. The crew of Avenger can describe the attack, as Isaac and Ureta describe it, almost word for word, proving that it was an attack on Avenger. One even looked over and watched Isaac pass down the port side and ditch his bombs in the sea as he overshot; something which Isaac himself admitted may have been the case. Isaac talks often about the "pom-pom guns" which fired at him, but Invincible had no such weapons. It had no guns. Isaac saw Avenger firing on full-auto airburst. He describes Invincible as being "quite alone" when in fact, Invincible was flanked by two ships almost as big as her - HMS Glamorgan and RFA Regent - and he describes Invincible as sailing north when she was sailing south... Avenger was sailing south and was "quite alone" and my belief is that the rear raydome mentioned in the pilots' report was actually the 4.5" gun of Avenger on the bow. This hints to a case of mistaken identity which at 500mph and under fire, is easy to do. My personal view is that they had vague memories of something, which were coerced - and evidence exists of this - to state that it was Invincible which they attacked. The truth is, they never came near to it or saw it. It was many times over the horizon. It should be noted that the UK released all files on the May 30th attack in 2012. Argentina released a limited version which even stated "there is doubt" over the pilots' claims, and Argentina still has not released the radar data on the two Super Etendards as to their exact position and launch point, knowing that this evidence will demolish the ridiculous claims. So the UK hides nothing, but Argentina is still hiding the things they don't want known. But LVSI still scream about Gordon Brookes??? Let's get real. Ultimately, all testimony, all evidence, all proof, shows that May 30th saw an attack on HMS Avenger, and that Invincible was never attacked and never hit. And that is the fact of it. It cannot be clearer. No evidence exists for the Argentine claims, because it simply didn't happen. If it had happened, I would be the first to publish it... not jokers like LVSI who can't tell their arses from their elbows. But it didn't happen. LVSI are the very worst example of history done by people who don't understand how history works. Worse, they know they're lying. They are conmen. This is why they block serious historians from the UK and Argentina, who refute their claims, because they have not got the basic level of talent to defend their wild conspiracy theories. Everything above, I have mentioned to them... their response is simply to block or become abusive, because they cannot answer against hard facts. There was never any attack on Invincible.
Es algo triste como en latinoamerica o hispanoamerica no podemos vernos como un grupo unido que peuda hacerle frente a problemas externos, incluso en africa hablan de uniones, porque no podemos pensar en algo parecido
Si hay forms de recuperar lo territorios de México pero no por el momento
Nunca entendí tanta rivalidad entre México y Argentina. Lo único que medio lo justifica en mi experiencia es la fuerte presencia negativa de argentinos y mexicanos en las redes sociales que siempre llevan a que los ataquen por la nacionalidad.
el futbol creo que puede ser el factor principal.
Gracias amigo mexicano por hablar bien de la causa Malvinas. Por una Latinoamérica unida 💪
Mexicano que se burla de malvinas = pobre tipo
Oye bro, sabes que paso con Ucranias Ryderback/RB?
¿Eres mexicano?
si.
It's a complete juxtaposition: Mexico was the only country on earth to publicly repudiate the Nazi occupation of Austria, but seemingly, you want us to believe that Mexico supports Argentine colonisation of the Falklands? That Mexico is simping for an Argentine Empire? I think it's silly and futile, if true, which is doubtful.
you returned!!!
thanks for commenting.
yes is it true,my country supports argentine claims on the islands. you can see president AMLO supporting argentine claims on the islands if you search spanish-language articles.
now,what do you think of my video regarding ureta and isaac testimonies? do you consider it an goord counterargument to your claims?
@@infrestitucho8721 I have been away and very busy... I cannot fathom how Mexico - a country which has lost swathes of territory to the USA, and who was the only country on earth to protest Nazi Germany's annexation of Austria - can support ideals of illegal Imperialism / Colonialism today. Either way, they're backing a loser on this one.
As to your video, I watched it some time ago, and I still don't buy it. The pilots' testimonies are full of holes and wishful thinking, and all evidence proves that they cannot be correct. I believe that after 42 years they may have convinced themselves that they are correct, but the fact remains that the difference between Isaac & Ureta and myself, is that I am the only one who has ever seen HMS Invincible: they have not.
The theories and hypotheses to try to make their story fit are beyond sensational... they are ludicrous and unworkable. Not one person of any credibility in 42 years has been able to elevate this from a conspiracy theory into an actual topic of history... literally not one historian, when to do so, if it was the case, would mean a lot of money and lasting fame.
I think that relying on internet weirdos like LVSI, Bortolotto and others, shows how daft the idea is. The only actual evidence is the say-so of the two men involved, who would be foolish to deny it after so long. I hope we agree there?
@@infrestitucho8721 I answered, but seemingly, it hasn't worked. My PC did a big update and was running slow...
So firstly, yes, I have been away, working on a new project based in WW2, so not very active online.
Secondly, the idea of Mexico - a country who stood alone in condemning the Nazi occupation of Austria and which itself has lost swathes of land to American Imperialism - condoning another people and their country being illegally owned against their will and against their human rights by a foreign power, only shows a lack of understanding or a disingenuous side. If they feel that way, they should protest the annexation of Texas et al in the UN, but they don't.
Finally, I know I looked at the video of Isaac and Ureta, although I seem unable to find it now... the bottom line is, that they're wrong. Be it lying, wishful thinking, mistaken identity or a desire to maintain their status and not look foolish is, I guess irrelevant. Almost 3,000 members of the task force were present on board those ships on May 30th and every single one of them laughs at the idea. They actively ridicule it.
Can two men - both who were in a position to gain by their claim, and who did gain materially in fame and fortune - overturn the experience of 3,000 men who were present, all of whom had nothing to gain, and who live in the most free speaking country in the world? - No. And the fact remains that not one of them has ever agreed with the Argentine version.
The evidence shows that the attack was on HMS Avenger. Avenger's crew tried to recover the body of Omar Jesus Castillo less than a minute after the attack, and managed to recover his flight hood and respirator... this was over 21 miles away from Invincible. I've spoken to guys who were in the water at the time trying to see if Castillo was alive. It is therefore obvious that Avenger was attacked, and not Invincible.
The crew of Avenger can describe the attack, as Isaac and Ureta describe it, almost word for word, proving that it was an attack on Avenger. One even looked over and watched Isaac pass down the port side and ditch his bombs in the sea as he overshot; something which Isaac himself admitted may have been the case.
Isaac talks often about the "pom-pom guns" which fired at him, but Invincible had no such weapons. It had no guns. Isaac saw Avenger firing on full-auto airburst. He describes Invincible as being "quite alone" when in fact, Invincible was flanked by two ships almost as big as her - HMS Glamorgan and RFA Regent - and he describes Invincible as sailing north when she was sailing south... Avenger was sailing south and was "quite alone" and my belief is that the rear raydome mentioned in the pilots' report was actually the 4.5" gun of Avenger on the bow.
This hints to a case of mistaken identity which at 500mph and under fire, is easy to do. My personal view is that they had vague memories of something, which were coerced - and evidence exists of this - to state that it was Invincible which they attacked. The truth is, they never came near to it or saw it. It was many times over the horizon.
It should be noted that the UK released all files on the May 30th attack in 2012. Argentina released a limited version which even stated "there is doubt" over the pilots' claims, and Argentina still has not released the radar data on the two Super Etendards as to their exact position and launch point, knowing that this evidence will demolish the ridiculous claims. So the UK hides nothing, but Argentina is still hiding the things they don't want known. But LVSI still scream about Gordon Brookes??? Let's get real.
Ultimately, all testimony, all evidence, all proof, shows that May 30th saw an attack on HMS Avenger, and that Invincible was never attacked and never hit. And that is the fact of it. It cannot be clearer. No evidence exists for the Argentine claims, because it simply didn't happen. If it had happened, I would be the first to publish it... not jokers like LVSI who can't tell their arses from their elbows. But it didn't happen.
LVSI are the very worst example of history done by people who don't understand how history works. Worse, they know they're lying. They are conmen. This is why they block serious historians from the UK and Argentina, who refute their claims, because they have not got the basic level of talent to defend their wild conspiracy theories. Everything above, I have mentioned to them... their response is simply to block or become abusive, because they cannot answer against hard facts.
There was never any attack on Invincible.
Borrando comentarios 😂😂😂
¿de que comentarios hablas?