Another tip is provide context to your answer. E.g Instead of saying there is a fixed probability of success. Say there is a fixed probability of success of 0.15 of hitting a coconut, Depending on the question
Hi Sir, I was just wondering for CLT, some of the practice questions I found used standardising the normal distribution to find the probability and I prefer to just use my calculator. This means some of my answers are just slightly off to theirs. A lot of these markschemes don’t have awrt included, so am I just better off standardising or would the regular method be ok as per edexcel markschemes? These questions were from some Edexcel topic tests I found online.
If you scroll down to the additional notes at the bottom of the MS of every question, sometimes it would say allow use of calculator and it would allow the slightly different value as well.
The regular method would be fine - there's no need to standardise, and modern mark schemes will have both methods accepted. I won't be standardising (unless there's a question with a missing sample size, in which case we are forced to).
Time to start my revision for fs1 now. About an hour left plenty of time to learn the whole thing before exam. Update: terrible exam. Last questions no idea m🥲
Sir do you have to show the process of finding the goodness of fit or will the mark scheme acknowledge that this process can be done on the calculator. Thanks in advance this is The Last Dance for me 😄
I'm not clear on the mark allocation for this - I would certainly at least show one term being calculated with the formula, possibly 2, then do a + ... if you don't have the time to do them all. That would be sufficient.
@@frenzyfire295 Hmmm before the exams for sure… I am rushing to get the remaining modules published, but will need to squeeze in time for this. FP1 is the next on the list, so this comment is reminding me to get on it!! Thank you!
If Mr Bicen had 10,000 fans, I am one of them. If Mr Bicen had 1 fan, I am his only fan. If Mr Bicen had 0 fans, then I am dead 😍
Yep i'm cooked, deep fried, hard boiled, airfried. Time for my scheduled bumming appointment at 2 tommorow
One tip is to define the random distribution X. E.g X= Number of games needed to roll a six for the first time
That's great actually - I agree that this can make the rest of the question a lot easier to interpret!
Another tip is provide context to your answer. E.g Instead of saying there is a fixed probability of success. Say there is a fixed probability of success of 0.15 of hitting a coconut, Depending on the question
Hi Sir. It would be fantastic if you could open the video for Further Decision 1 as well. I would greatly appreciate it as my exam is next week.
I just opened it up, as well as FP1!
@@BicenMaths this is why you are a legend.
Where can I find some examples of question for FS1🙏
Can you make one for further pure 1 please
thanks king
Can't see the sheet?
Took the link out the description as it is members only. You can find it in the Members Google Drive!
God send
Well Mr Bicen, you just lost yourself a subscriber
Why
His videos are great, but charging people for content then releasing it for free is never a good business model
bro dropping this a few days before the exam. thankssssss
22 hours IMA COOK LIKE I DID ON MECHANICS 💯💯💯
did you cook on 7c brotha?
@@noa3691 SO HARD PULLED OUT THE SERIES SUMMATIONS
thank you for releasing this!! are you planning to release one for Decisions 1 aswell?
gang wtf was that
Thanks for releasing this! Can I just ask if your planning a live stream for fs1 and fp1 ? Your other livestreams have been so helpful!!
No livestreams on these - getting hectic with my own prep for all the “2” modules!
last time i touched fs was in FEB, am i finished???
Same lmao
Hi Sir, I was just wondering for CLT, some of the practice questions I found used standardising the normal distribution to find the probability and I prefer to just use my calculator. This means some of my answers are just slightly off to theirs. A lot of these markschemes don’t have awrt included, so am I just better off standardising or would the regular method be ok as per edexcel markschemes? These questions were from some Edexcel topic tests I found online.
If you scroll down to the additional notes at the bottom of the MS of every question, sometimes it would say allow use of calculator and it would allow the slightly different value as well.
The regular method would be fine - there's no need to standardise, and modern mark schemes will have both methods accepted. I won't be standardising (unless there's a question with a missing sample size, in which case we are forced to).
Time to start my revision for fs1 now. About an hour left plenty of time to learn the whole thing before exam. Update: terrible exam. Last questions no idea m🥲
Agreed
my GOAT blessed me again 🙏🙏 saving my FM grade fr
Hi bicen, will you be doing a similar thing for free for the decision 1 paper coming up soon?
Yes... soon...
@@BicenMaths Thank you so much!
Hi will you do one for further decision?
17:58 NO WAY BICENS HOME SCREEN IS HIS UA-cam CHANNEL PFP
where is the pdf?
Please can you make one for Further Pure 1
he has a summaries playlist on his channel, and theres an FP1 vid on it. theres an extra link in the description
Where can i find the downloadable version of the pdf?
Only available to the members - sorry! Just released this video in the build up to the exams.
@@BicenMaths No worries. Thanks alot for the video! Great help
Sir do you have to show the process of finding the goodness of fit or will the mark scheme acknowledge that this process can be done on the calculator. Thanks in advance this is The Last Dance for me 😄
I'm not clear on the mark allocation for this - I would certainly at least show one term being calculated with the formula, possibly 2, then do a + ... if you don't have the time to do them all. That would be sufficient.
@@BicenMaths Fair enough, That is a good idea since these questions are already so time consuming
Perhaps i can write the calculations of OI^2/EI -N But not actually do it
@LeBronJames-mt3fd just do one with numbers substituted in and then dot dot dot so it shows you know which numbers are which
Please make FP1 everything you need to memorise public 🙏😭
for CLT you don't need to use any continuity corrections, right?
No, definitely not!
thank you
hi, what do you think about the Further Mechanics 1 paper difficulty?
He did a youtube short on his page of what he thought :)
Yes, I did! Full reaction there :)
where can i find the sheet?
I imagine it'll be on the paid version so people can't just take this and then look at it later when it's behind a paywall
You don't need to calculate cumulative probabilities manually for NB, you can use the fact that P(Y=r) when Y~NB(r,p) and X~B(n,p)
Yes this is an excellent point! 👏🏼
Hmmm - I have seen this in model solutions but I don't understand how it works.
I thought this was members only content
L
Looking forward to the fp1 🔥🔥
That’s already uploaded
@@LeBronJames-mt3fdyeah I just realized I'm dumb, I meant fp1 💀
FP1 on its way soon! Probably one of the trickiest to summarise, there is SO much stuff in FP1!
@@BicenMaths Any idea when it could be released?
@@frenzyfire295 Hmmm before the exams for sure… I am rushing to get the remaining modules published, but will need to squeeze in time for this. FP1 is the next on the list, so this comment is reminding me to get on it!! Thank you!