I own the SSL12 and the sound is so clean without being sterile, the ADAT ability and seperate mixes and very flexible software packages really sold it for me though, allowing me to send seperate headphone mixes was a must for recording with others, and this interface allows that with perfect workflow! I definetly will be picking up a preamp for that ADAT
I had both. The SSL is dope you can add more channels to it via adat and can use the talkback mic in the recording like a room mic. The volt is cool but the volume for the monitoring is kinda iffy. Both are dope interfaces depending on what you need them for input wise.
The "upgrade path" point is an excellent one! And SSL does make outboard banks of pres for ADAT expansion with the PureDrive Quad and Octo - also at 32bit! 😊
Great comparison - thank you for this work. I think it’s such a great time to be a musician or recording engineer… so many great gear choices at such affordable prices. It’s hard to go wrong with even a little research and thought. I’m personally looking to finally upgrade my Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 2nd gen interface to one of these, and I’m happy knowing either choice would serve me really well for years and years to come. I’m also pondering the UA Apollo Solo, since it’s around the same price point. Thanks again for such a great video and work done here!
Great review! The SSL is the clear winner, but I use an Apollo x4 and UAD plugins in Console. The x4 addresses the 476P short-comings. Independent headphone cues, 3 output pairs, ADAT ins/out, 48v per channel, etc. I use a MOTU 8 pre with the Apollo x4 for 12 inputs in total. I’d like to know more about the SSL software versus the UA Console, which I use for everything. Loopback, virtual channels, system & DAW audio mixing for video, classic Chanel strips, compressors, eq, etc.
Thanks for this. Earlier today (before watching this) I ordered an SSL 12, after carefully looking at the UA 476P (and everything else on Sweetwater Sound [US]). I liked the per- input 48v and high-pass across the top, with fairly granular signal meters in-line, and that 32-bit should be more valuable than than the UA compression. ADAT was also a big plus. These were super helpful reviews.
I absolutely love the design of the SSL. I just think it takes me back to the old console style. I agree with you in this, and your review video of the SSL, the 4K button is just pointless really. Also, I didn’t realize that the volt didn’t give all the UAD features in terms of software compatibility, super disappointing, as I’m using Luna as my main DAw right now. Anyway, I also think that the SSL, without the 4K button switched on, has the better sound. I just like a truer, and cleaner sound. It’s just a better base to work from. Thanks for the reviews, thanks for the comparison , it has given me confidence in my choice.
I own the VOLT 476P and don't want to change for the SSL because one thing: SOUND. The preamps give my synths a hot analogic color without to lost hours to set a compressor. An another point i can check easily all signal levels during the jam session. If i want a good interface for the connectivity my first priority will be a Dante option 🤷♂
The biggest advantage the Volt has is mobile compatibility, SSL 12 requires their software. The “throttling” that you described is more likely a limitation necessitated by making it compatible with iOS/Android. While the SSL is a great product, it loses a bit of flexibility in that regard. I do use an iPad to do quick things on the go when traveling, and for users like myself, that’s definitely something to consider as well.
I would never record with the 4k button activated, however its super useful when I have video calls or similar settings - where I won't do post production on my voice and just want to have a little more presence and clarity in my speaking voice :)
Why you Don t record with 4k . I think to buy ssl 12 in the future And as my knowledge the 4k Britton give s caractere and some anologe saturation give some energy of the recording . What your opinion about that
At $499.00 …That 4k button is a gimmick. You want that SSL 4k character? .. Just use an EQ. I’d love to see what analog circuits are in the SSL If there are any. I’m always Leary when something is so “ software” integratabtle. That being said.. it appears to be the best bang for the buck in this price range. So it’s on my list when it’s time to upgrade my interface.
I've also seen comments about the SSL 12 having too much gain to record louder sources. Was wondering your thoughts on that as well. Thanks for the comparison video, it's helpful.
I would really like the SSL 12 because I see in other review it’s extremely low noise, one of the best performing interfaces and it has some excellent high level features. I need SPDIF though , I wish the direct monitoring blend knob also had a button on/off option.
Awesome video!!!! thanks a lot!. Have you tried as "stand alone" ? I mean turning the mac off and listening what's coming from the inputs. This is for live monitoring or just listening external instruments. I have a digital mixer that got broken so thinking to buying this.
I just got the Volt 476P for this very reason over the SSL12. From what I read on SSL, I couldn't find much documentation on its standalone mode. I think if its setup via its software, as long as it doesn't loose power it would retain? If any other owners on here could verify? Volt for 1 has a separate power supply so it's easier to keep on. Its stand alone mode works mostly fantastic, as all inputs can route mono or stereo to its monitor bus, outs 1/2 (no 3/4) and headphones. No software needed, no computer/iPad needed. The only big caveat is that when connected to iPad, its computer input runs full volume and can't be controlled via iPad. So if you're listing to e.i. Spotify via iPad, the only way to attenuate the volume is the monitor knob. This can make it difficult to balance out monitoring inputs alongside connected device playback.
Hi there, late to the party but how is the direct monitoring with the SSL 12? I’ve heard some negatives about the 476P. I’m shopping between the two today, and struggling with the decision, although the 476P is on sale at the moment. 🤔
The UA preamps sound smoother and a little more natural to my ears. Considering they’re at the same price point, the SSL is a clear winner with better features, design, and user interface.
If the ssl had adat out as well it would have been truly great! No option to go out of the daw into external fx or an analog mixer/summing in this day an age is a leaving money on the table.
I’m looking at something to replace my Apollo Arrow (which is now the solo I think?) You are spot on about upgrades, there’s nothing UA that makes sense for me to buy even though I love the plugins and software. I’m glad the volt has midi, I have to keep my old Audiobox plugged in just for midi but the Volt doesn’t make sense to me without the same mixing software console for routing Apollo interfaces have. Add the inputs being at the front and it just feels intentionally designed not to be a viable option compared to their more expensive options. I’ve been thinking about either an EVO 16 or SSL 12 now I’ve been reading more about them.
My SSL2+, with very "light" use, has NOT held up well. Channel 1 "line" button died, and now line 2 doesn't work, and I've only used it a handful of times.
The 4K button makes his voice sound like the back of his tongue is lifted. I think that’s where there’s some increase in energy - along with the increase on the top end.
32bit as great, but sharing files with band mates is - yah, they all use 24bit 96khz - so it becomes a sample mess. With the standards all over the place, & a ton of added gimmicks, I'm sticking with the "lower standards " for now. I hope all the units make it to 32bit. Most everything over 96khz is overkill anyway, so along as they atleast go to 96khz. Great video, thanks for sharing.
UA 476P with vintage and comp circuit on introduced some phase-y sounds as well. Can't quite say "phase discrepancies" as it appears you are only using a single microphone source.
They invest in built quality but SSL invest in performance quality. Maybe the price of these other interfaces has a bump because of the expenses in the built quality and not necessarily the performance.
My SSL, with light use, has NOT held up well. Poor quality, in my opinion. Two channels have already developed issue, one with the "line" button failing, and the other, for some unknown reason, will not record at a normal level.
@@peterpulpitpounder Thanks for the heads up. I think I'm going to buy Motu Ultralight MK5. My scarlett solo is working fine to 7 year's. I need something with more channel and atleast equally or more reliable
@@clickbaitpro I hope everything works out well for you. A Solid State rep told me they have upgraded some "parts" that were problematic on their previous models. :)
The volt sounds like an orange product to me and also the compressor adds way too much noise and overall some love it but I don't like that volt 276 much prefer ssl 2 or Apollo Twin I would bake it
Something to mention is that the SSL cable (at least the 2+ I own) keeps disconnecting from my laptop at the slightest movement, to the point I’m now considering buying another audio interface. It’s that bad
I would really like the SSL 12 because I see in other review it’s extremely low noise, one of the best performing interfaces and it has some excellent high level features. I need SPDIF though , I wish the direct monitoring blend knob also had a button on/off option.
![Звукозапись без пафоса [Что нужно для начала]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jCPErrCesZc/mqdefault.jpg)
Yes I know…Snape not Black, please… no more! 😂
😂
Thank you, no I may rest
I own the SSL12 and the sound is so clean without being sterile, the ADAT ability and seperate mixes and very flexible software packages really sold it for me though, allowing me to send seperate headphone mixes was a must for recording with others, and this interface allows that with perfect workflow! I definetly will be picking up a preamp for that ADAT
I have the SSL12 as well. I just purchased the Behringer 8 channel ADAT preamp. Works great.
I had both. The SSL is dope you can add more channels to it via adat and can use the talkback mic in the recording like a room mic. The volt is cool but the volume for the monitoring is kinda iffy. Both are dope interfaces depending on what you need them for input wise.
I havent touched recording equipment in over ten years so… this gear is friggin mindblowing. Great demo.
The "upgrade path" point is an excellent one! And SSL does make outboard banks of pres for ADAT expansion with the PureDrive Quad and Octo - also at 32bit! 😊
yes.. this just sold this to me.
Great comparison - thank you for this work. I think it’s such a great time to be a musician or recording engineer… so many great gear choices at such affordable prices. It’s hard to go wrong with even a little research and thought. I’m personally looking to finally upgrade my Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 2nd gen interface to one of these, and I’m happy knowing either choice would serve me really well for years and years to come. I’m also pondering the UA Apollo Solo, since it’s around the same price point. Thanks again for such a great video and work done here!
Great review! The SSL is the clear winner, but I use an Apollo x4 and UAD plugins in Console. The x4 addresses the 476P short-comings. Independent headphone cues, 3 output pairs, ADAT ins/out, 48v per channel, etc. I use a MOTU 8 pre with the Apollo x4 for 12 inputs in total. I’d like to know more about the SSL software versus the UA Console, which I use for everything. Loopback, virtual channels, system & DAW audio mixing for video, classic Chanel strips, compressors, eq, etc.
Thank you for this video. I was waiting for this comparison. Lovely video
Thanks for this. Earlier today (before watching this) I ordered an SSL 12, after carefully looking at the UA 476P (and everything else on Sweetwater Sound [US]). I liked the per- input 48v and high-pass across the top, with fairly granular signal meters in-line, and that 32-bit should be more valuable than than the UA compression. ADAT was also a big plus. These were super helpful reviews.
I absolutely love the design of the SSL. I just think it takes me back to the old console style. I agree with you in this, and your review video of the SSL, the 4K button is just pointless really. Also, I didn’t realize that the volt didn’t give all the UAD features in terms of software compatibility, super disappointing, as I’m using Luna as my main DAw right now. Anyway, I also think that the SSL, without the 4K button switched on, has the better sound. I just like a truer, and cleaner sound. It’s just a better base to work from. Thanks for the reviews, thanks for the comparison , it has given me confidence in my choice.
I own the VOLT 476P and don't want to change for the SSL because one thing: SOUND. The preamps give my synths a hot analogic color without to lost hours to set a compressor. An another point i can check easily all signal levels during the jam session. If i want a good interface for the connectivity my first priority will be a Dante option 🤷♂
SSL-12 (4 channels) connected via ADAT to the SSL Puredrive Octo (with 8 channels) gives you a total of 12 preamps/channels! 🎉
SSL has the PureDrive preamps now to connect to that ADAT port. Audient has a few mic preamps too for adding extra ADAT channels with some colour.
Came to comments to say exactly this. Thought someone would have noted it. 👍
The biggest advantage the Volt has is mobile compatibility, SSL 12 requires their software. The “throttling” that you described is more likely a limitation necessitated by making it compatible with iOS/Android. While the SSL is a great product, it loses a bit of flexibility in that regard. I do use an iPad to do quick things on the go when traveling, and for users like myself, that’s definitely something to consider as well.
Me too but I just use a zoom for my iPad
Great comparison.
I would never record with the 4k button activated, however its super useful when I have video calls or similar settings - where I won't do post production on my voice and just want to have a little more presence and clarity in my speaking voice :)
Why you Don t record with 4k .
I think to buy ssl 12 in the future
And as my knowledge the 4k Britton give s caractere and some anologe saturation give some energy of the recording .
What your opinion about that
At $499.00 …That 4k button is a gimmick. You want that SSL 4k character? .. Just use an EQ. I’d love to see what analog circuits are in the SSL If there are any. I’m always Leary when something is so “ software” integratabtle. That being said.. it appears to be the best bang for the buck in this price range. So it’s on my list when it’s time to upgrade my interface.
@@electrowayne2918 how you do an analoge caractere with an eq?
@@Ramixff 2 simple ways................ us an analog EQ.... or use Analog Emulation ....
@@Ramixff use an analog EQ...or use Analog Emulation
You speak very intelligently about music.
I've also seen comments about the SSL 12 having too much gain to record louder sources. Was wondering your thoughts on that as well. Thanks for the comparison video, it's helpful.
I would really like the SSL 12 because I see in other review it’s extremely low noise, one of the best performing interfaces and it has some excellent high level features. I need SPDIF though , I wish the direct monitoring blend knob also had a button on/off option.
For mic pre expansion, the Pure Drive Quad and Pure Drive Octo are obvious choices if you want to stay in the SSL camp.
Awesome video!!!! thanks a lot!. Have you tried as "stand alone" ? I mean turning the mac off and listening what's coming from the inputs. This is for live monitoring or just listening external instruments. I have a digital mixer that got broken so thinking to buying this.
I just got the Volt 476P for this very reason over the SSL12. From what I read on SSL, I couldn't find much documentation on its standalone mode. I think if its setup via its software, as long as it doesn't loose power it would retain? If any other owners on here could verify? Volt for 1 has a separate power supply so it's easier to keep on. Its stand alone mode works mostly fantastic, as all inputs can route mono or stereo to its monitor bus, outs 1/2 (no 3/4) and headphones. No software needed, no computer/iPad needed. The only big caveat is that when connected to iPad, its computer input runs full volume and can't be controlled via iPad. So if you're listing to e.i. Spotify via iPad, the only way to attenuate the volume is the monitor knob. This can make it difficult to balance out monitoring inputs alongside connected device playback.
Hi there, late to the party but how is the direct monitoring with the SSL 12? I’ve heard some negatives about the 476P. I’m shopping between the two today, and struggling with the decision, although the 476P is on sale at the moment. 🤔
The UA preamps sound smoother and a little more natural to my ears. Considering they’re at the same price point, the SSL is a clear winner with better features, design, and user interface.
If the ssl had adat out as well it would have been truly great! No option to go out of the daw into external fx or an analog mixer/summing in this day an age is a leaving money on the table.
I’m looking at something to replace my Apollo Arrow (which is now the solo I think?) You are spot on about upgrades, there’s nothing UA that makes sense for me to buy even though I love the plugins and software. I’m glad the volt has midi, I have to keep my old Audiobox plugged in just for midi but the Volt doesn’t make sense to me without the same mixing software console for routing Apollo interfaces have. Add the inputs being at the front and it just feels intentionally designed not to be a viable option compared to their more expensive options. I’ve been thinking about either an EVO 16 or SSL 12 now I’ve been reading more about them.
My SSL2+, with very "light" use, has NOT held up well. Channel 1 "line" button died, and now line 2 doesn't work, and I've only used it a handful of times.
The 4K button makes his voice sound like the back of his tongue is lifted. I think that’s where there’s some increase in energy - along with the increase on the top end.
I went with the UA volt, but I appreciate the honesty.
32bit as great, but sharing files with band mates is - yah, they all use 24bit 96khz - so it becomes a sample mess. With the standards all over the place, & a ton of added gimmicks, I'm sticking with the "lower standards " for now. I hope all the units make it to 32bit. Most everything over 96khz is overkill anyway, so along as they atleast go to 96khz. Great video, thanks for sharing.
UA 476P with vintage and comp circuit on introduced some phase-y sounds as well. Can't quite say "phase discrepancies" as it appears you are only using a single microphone source.
They invest in built quality but SSL invest in performance quality. Maybe the price of these other interfaces has a bump because of the expenses in the built quality and not necessarily the performance.
My SSL, with light use, has NOT held up well. Poor quality, in my opinion. Two channels have already developed issue, one with the "line" button failing, and the other, for some unknown reason, will not record at a normal level.
@@peterpulpitpounder Thanks for the heads up. I think I'm going to buy Motu Ultralight MK5. My scarlett solo is working fine to 7 year's. I need something with more channel and atleast equally or more reliable
@@clickbaitpro I hope everything works out well for you. A Solid State rep told me they have upgraded some "parts" that were problematic on their previous models. :)
I am thinking of upgrading my audio interface (scarlett focusrite 6i6 2nd gen) Any suggestions on something comparable but more current?
Vintage preamp on the UA sounds awesome by itself but I would keep the SSL as well.
That's not Sirius Black. It's Professor Severus Snape. Also, as others have already pointed out, SSL makes the Pure Drive Quad and Octo preamps.
No need to double down then eh? 😂
@@HarvVideoAudioStuff Not to be outdone, I believe I quadrupled down.
😂
What about your thoughts between SSL2+ VS UA 276 VOLT, IS THE SSL2+ BETTER?
Hmm I’ve not tried the uad but on paper things look much closer
The volt sounds like an orange product to me and also the compressor adds way too much noise and overall some love it but I don't like that volt 276 much prefer ssl 2 or Apollo Twin
I would bake it
Apollo X4 seems your taste.
SSL pretty bright clean sound. UA color a bit (in a good way), add more body & punch to the sound with still clean sound. I pick UA
This is annoying. The Volt sounds better to me, but the layout of the SSL works so much better for me.
Wich one did you pick ?
@ life stuff happened so none, but figured I’d get an audient ID instead. Need to read up on the new gen SSL now.
Level matching…….?
SSL12 .
Surprisingly easy call.
Something to mention is that the SSL cable (at least the 2+ I own) keeps disconnecting from my laptop at the slightest movement, to the point I’m now considering buying another audio interface. It’s that bad
You talking about from the c port ? It gets loose?
"Is that legal?" 🤣
There is no fight. SSL12 is just better.
Is it just me or does the Volt boost plosives? Lip smacky.
Hmm yes perhaps a little
I would really like the SSL 12 because I see in other review it’s extremely low noise, one of the best performing interfaces and it has some excellent high level features. I need SPDIF though , I wish the direct monitoring blend knob also had a button on/off option.