RAYLEIGH RITZ method in FEA

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @zellalmohammed406
    @zellalmohammed406 4 роки тому +3

    Although I did not understand the language, the explanation is great

  • @08a_omkarvishwasbhor26
    @08a_omkarvishwasbhor26 3 роки тому

    Really Thank you mam I completely understood Rayleigh Ritz method after watching it video

  • @GeorgeNams6986
    @GeorgeNams6986 3 роки тому

    Just what I needed. Title in English, video in Hindi or whatever that language is. Thanks though.

  • @paulinocongo2482
    @paulinocongo2482 2 роки тому +2

    Good afternoon professor, I need help on this question, For a straight rod with variable cross section, its cross section change function is A(x), and the Ritz method is used to find the function of deformation of the rod under action of its own weight along the axial direction.

  • @prasadbharath62
    @prasadbharath62 4 роки тому +1

    Thank u for explaining patiencely. Mam during typing in calculator for integration part its difficult to visible as on the calculator screen light is focused.

  • @tejbirsingh1537
    @tejbirsingh1537 Рік тому

    Thank you
    Really helpful video

  • @visheshkaushik1722
    @visheshkaushik1722 4 роки тому +6

    Can you please tell me the difference between galerikin approach and the rayleigh ritz approach?

  • @sahilchikhale7737
    @sahilchikhale7737 4 роки тому +1

    Salute to ur hardwork and excellent teaching👌👌

  • @rishabhverma9888
    @rishabhverma9888 4 роки тому +3

    Ma'am, can you please explain this. At 10:22, 11:15 , how can LHS be zero. Since Wi is not constant, how can we Integrate (d2y/dx2) and get (dy/dx) by taking Wi as constant. If we can do this so why did you not did the same thing in the RHS (12:21) where we can take Wi outside as constant and integrate (dy/dx) and get (y).

    • @sud369
      @sud369 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah she solved it wrong wi will not come in limit 0 to 1 it's outside integration
      wrong solution

  • @KunwarArun
    @KunwarArun 2 роки тому +1

    Isn't it look similar to Galerkin method ?

  • @aniruddhataari1633
    @aniruddhataari1633 Рік тому +1

    NOTE : THE DEREVATIVE OF 1 IS O NOT 1. I DID THIS MISTAKE IN MY UT SO PLEASE MAKE NOTE IN YOUR VIDEO. THANK YOU

  • @mallikak6521
    @mallikak6521 3 роки тому

    Hai mam excellent teaching

  • @sumanbiswas1003
    @sumanbiswas1003 4 роки тому +2

    Madam,please make more videos on FEM.....

  • @dudekuladadavali3468
    @dudekuladadavali3468 3 роки тому

    Super explanation medam

  • @ravidranathroyal4766
    @ravidranathroyal4766 4 роки тому +1

    Good explanation

  • @mallikak6521
    @mallikak6521 3 роки тому

    Mam one doubt how is find W values for another problems

    • @mallikak6521
      @mallikak6521 3 роки тому

      And what is R and W in it pls Ritz method formula

  • @amitpatil7703
    @amitpatil7703 3 роки тому

    Wi ki value dali tab to integration dy/dx ka he to uske limit wi ko kase mile

  • @vijaysinghchauhan7079
    @vijaysinghchauhan7079 10 місяців тому

    bina functional ke help se kaise kardiya apne?

  • @ayushipandey1582
    @ayushipandey1582 Рік тому +2

    bhai dimag ka bhosda ho gaya hai....dono ko ek hi tarike se solve kar diya(ritz and galerkin)

  • @r-rk
    @r-rk 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you madam

  • @kshitij4461
    @kshitij4461 4 роки тому +1

    Ty for this....

  • @rajputsinghshivanshu8921
    @rajputsinghshivanshu8921 2 роки тому

    Nice

  • @youtubemovies-topic9864
    @youtubemovies-topic9864 3 роки тому

    I don't know hindi but I understand please speak English

  • @rishikbharadwaj8994
    @rishikbharadwaj8994 4 роки тому

    But this is not FEM it's general galerkin method

  • @stats6982
    @stats6982 Рік тому

    wrong solved

  • @nileshnalawade5414
    @nileshnalawade5414 3 роки тому +1

    Hii 😀