Good afternoon professor, I need help on this question, For a straight rod with variable cross section, its cross section change function is A(x), and the Ritz method is used to find the function of deformation of the rod under action of its own weight along the axial direction.
Thank u for explaining patiencely. Mam during typing in calculator for integration part its difficult to visible as on the calculator screen light is focused.
Ma'am, can you please explain this. At 10:22, 11:15 , how can LHS be zero. Since Wi is not constant, how can we Integrate (d2y/dx2) and get (dy/dx) by taking Wi as constant. If we can do this so why did you not did the same thing in the RHS (12:21) where we can take Wi outside as constant and integrate (dy/dx) and get (y).
Although I did not understand the language, the explanation is great
Really Thank you mam I completely understood Rayleigh Ritz method after watching it video
Just what I needed. Title in English, video in Hindi or whatever that language is. Thanks though.
Good afternoon professor, I need help on this question, For a straight rod with variable cross section, its cross section change function is A(x), and the Ritz method is used to find the function of deformation of the rod under action of its own weight along the axial direction.
Thank u for explaining patiencely. Mam during typing in calculator for integration part its difficult to visible as on the calculator screen light is focused.
Thank you
Really helpful video
Can you please tell me the difference between galerikin approach and the rayleigh ritz approach?
Salute to ur hardwork and excellent teaching👌👌
Ma'am, can you please explain this. At 10:22, 11:15 , how can LHS be zero. Since Wi is not constant, how can we Integrate (d2y/dx2) and get (dy/dx) by taking Wi as constant. If we can do this so why did you not did the same thing in the RHS (12:21) where we can take Wi outside as constant and integrate (dy/dx) and get (y).
Yeah she solved it wrong wi will not come in limit 0 to 1 it's outside integration
wrong solution
Isn't it look similar to Galerkin method ?
NOTE : THE DEREVATIVE OF 1 IS O NOT 1. I DID THIS MISTAKE IN MY UT SO PLEASE MAKE NOTE IN YOUR VIDEO. THANK YOU
Hai mam excellent teaching
Madam,please make more videos on FEM.....
Sure..i am working on it
Super explanation medam
Good explanation
Thankyou
Mam one doubt how is find W values for another problems
And what is R and W in it pls Ritz method formula
Wi ki value dali tab to integration dy/dx ka he to uske limit wi ko kase mile
bina functional ke help se kaise kardiya apne?
bhai dimag ka bhosda ho gaya hai....dono ko ek hi tarike se solve kar diya(ritz and galerkin)
Thank you madam
Ty for this....
Nice
I don't know hindi but I understand please speak English
But this is not FEM it's general galerkin method
aaaah yeah i catch you here rishik
Actually this is Rayleigh ritz method Sir...
wrong solved
Hii 😀
Hiiiiiii😁