Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Google Product Manager Prioritization Interview: Tilt Brush

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 сер 2024
  • Watch the full analysis and debrief of this video here: bit.ly/3uHieuH
    Watch our mock Google PM interview. Kevin Wei (Coinbase PM) asks Cherrie, Google PM, on how she would prioritize features for Tilt Brush, Google's VR painting app.
    Chapters -
    00:00:00 Introduction
    00:00:36 Question
    00:00:50 Clarifying questions
    00:01:14 Answer
    00:12:29 Follow-up questions
    To see more mock PM interviews, you can browse our UA-cam Playlist: bit.ly/mockpm
    - Technical question by Google PM: • Google PM - PM intervi...
    - Product question by Google PM: • Mock Product Manager I...
    - Product question by Microsoft PM: • Mock Product Manager I...
    - Product question by Amazon (Twitch) PM: • Curriculum - Alarm Clo...
    - Negotiation tips: • How to Negotiate Your ...
    👉 Subscribe to our channel: bit.ly/exponentyt
    🕊️ Follow us on Twitter: bit.ly/exptweet
    💙 Like us on Facebook for special discounts: bit.ly/exponentfb
    📷 Check us out on Instagram: bit.ly/exponentig
    📹 Watch us on TikTok: bit.ly/exponenttikttok
    ABOUT US:
    Did you enjoy this interview question and answer? Want to land your dream career? Exponent is an online community, course, and coaching platform to help you ace your upcoming interview. Exponent has helped people land their dream careers at companies like Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and high-growth startups. Exponent is currently licensed by Stanford, Yale, UW, and others.
    Our courses include interview lessons, questions, and complete answers with video walkthroughs. Access hours of real interview videos, where we analyze what went right or wrong, and our 1000+ community of expert coaches and industry professionals, to help you get your dream job and more!
    #productmanagement #google #prioritization #productmanager #entrepreneurship #product #prodmgmt #exponent #execution

КОМЕНТАРІ • 28

  • @dwallstreetguy
    @dwallstreetguy 2 роки тому +13

    Ooooh. Sorry guys I wasn't sold on this one. I was expecting a really straight forward method to [1] what are the discrete priorities, [2] their rationale on why they feel its a priority, then [3] layout the benefits in why this prioritization makes sense. That's it! If what I just saw is the standard, I guess I need to get a better grasp on prioritization. Nothing negative meant toward the mock-up at all. I searched out this topic because I am NOT an expert on this and wanted to learn great techniques. It just didn't give me what I expected. By no means am I saying I could do it better. Given that I am the only one that commented with question, obviously that says I need to get a better grasp on this.

  • @intykid
    @intykid 3 роки тому +13

    To the last question about High effort, high impact versus medium impact and low effort, I think it would be a good idea to understand the features impact towards the north star metric in the given time line. If the high effort feature cannot be delivered within the timeline but drives more impact towards the OKR, a stakeholder meeting could be called for, to draw a conclusion.

  • @tryexponent
    @tryexponent  3 роки тому +1

    Watch the full analysis and debrief of this video here: bit.ly/3uHieuH

    • @Daruk815
      @Daruk815 3 роки тому

      The link doesn't work for me. It just opens short url website

    • @tryexponent
      @tryexponent  3 роки тому +1

      @@Daruk815 We fixed it!

    • @Daruk815
      @Daruk815 3 роки тому

      @@tryexponent thanks, it works now.

  • @douglassamuel
    @douglassamuel Рік тому +1

    Wow, that was amazing! I just loved it. Way more deeper than reading about it online.

  • @litoXvannie
    @litoXvannie 2 роки тому +2

    Love Cherrie for these mock interviews! Thanks

  • @TheInterviewSage
    @TheInterviewSage 3 роки тому +1

    Awesome interview. Thanks for sharing 👏😀

  • @multiversityx
    @multiversityx 3 роки тому +4

    Amazing mock interview

  • @danweiss9233
    @danweiss9233 Рік тому

    I agree with everything the interviewee was saying about the difficulty associated with prioritizing in this context, but this video didn't even end with a concrete answers to the question.

  • @rusl12
    @rusl12 3 роки тому +1

    Really good!

  • @sudeepamitra
    @sudeepamitra 2 роки тому

    Nice !

  • @sudeepamitra
    @sudeepamitra 2 роки тому +1

    Sweet

  • @dwsolberg
    @dwsolberg Рік тому +1

    I think the mistake here was not asking enough questions. I would want a PM to start by many more clarifying questions.

  • @jonathanstroz6424
    @jonathanstroz6424 Рік тому +6

    I dont think she answered this question well.. It was so far from concise. I would answer by first asking clarifying questions to better understand the product, its mission and the current business objectives. Then from there I would brainstorm a few features and prioritize them using the rice framework. After that I would summarize a provide my solution. Instead she spends the first 5 minutes babbling about how the oculus is hard to put on...

    • @tryexponent
      @tryexponent  Рік тому

      Hi Jonathan! Thanks for watching and sharing your thoughts. Your plan to answer the question sounds good!

  • @radar29
    @radar29 2 роки тому +12

    Too much fluff

  • @sugandhadogra1781
    @sugandhadogra1781 3 роки тому +4

    I was expecting some kind of techniques for Prioritisation being named like moscow, 100 dollar etc.

    • @intykid
      @intykid 3 роки тому +8

      The framework she's using is a simplified RICE framework in my opinion

  • @TheBigCheezeIt
    @TheBigCheezeIt 2 роки тому +16

    The interviewer was so unengaged. I wouldn't work for him. She was really giving a lot and he was very dry and not engaging back.

    • @tommynguyen6399
      @tommynguyen6399 2 роки тому +1

      Well that's how most interviewers are, considering they conduct 5-6 interviews everyday.

    • @TheBigCheezeIt
      @TheBigCheezeIt 2 роки тому +1

      @@tommynguyen6399 I do PM interviews for a big tech company and we do not do that all day. We aren't HR.

    • @looppp
      @looppp 10 місяців тому

      So, some onus on the interviewee too. Part of our job is to also ask clarifying questions. Cherrie did not really give him that opportunity.

  • @erikuff
    @erikuff Рік тому +5

    Lol this is just a long way of saying it depends

  • @almercy
    @almercy 2 роки тому +5

    I am starting to dislike "PM interviews" and the growing cookie-cutter industry that let's anyone memorize their framework and process to get a job. So many intangibles in a real-world that many schools cannot prepare you for unless you dipped your toes. Highly suggest trying your "learnings" on your own startup idea first to get a true "guerrilla warfare" PM experience.

    • @coolwaterz
      @coolwaterz Рік тому

      its gatekeeping at its best to justify startups like exponent existing and charging you money. All one needs to do is ask Cherrie how she prioritized her own roadmap at Google and likewise for any candidate. the PM interview has turned into a toxic MBA/shitty consultant turned product mgr circle jerk.