World-renowned philosopher Daniel C. Dennett argues that our inner worlds and religious ideas can all be explained as evolutionary functions of the brain.
"You have not yet learned that in this life you have to be like everyone else: the perfect mediocrity - no better, no worse. Individuality is a monster and it must be strangled in its cradle to make our friends feel comfortable." ― Stanley Kubrick (1928-1999)
@@krisc6216 Why come to a video on a subject by a man you clearly disagree with/dislike, and tell the world so? It's not as though Jackery Pumpkin was asking YOU if you'd like more Dennett. You can just choose to not click on any videos he's in. It's really a very simple concept: No likey? No clicky. Yes likey? Yes clicky. You're welcome.
@@Quazi-moto how do I know I disagree with him, if I don't let him talk first? I'm not coming nessecarily to a Dennett video, but to a video on conciousness and time. Now I heard what he is saying I must warn the viewers that he clearly has no clue what he is talking about, and that he is fooling himself, and anyone who admires him. Thank you, you're welcome.
@@krisc6216 Your first point is valid. It was my mistake to assume you had seen/heard him talk before. He's a philosopher, not a physicist. Big difference. He said himself that philosophy is more art than science. And he said _nothing_ in this video that can be declared outright false or incorrect. Honestly, do you think "No thank you" is a warning that people will recognize? And what is it, exactly, you feel you "must warn the viewers" about? His cluelessness on which subject(s) -- as he covers several here? How are you so sure he's wrong? Just for the record I'm not trying to make you mad or troll you or anything else like that. My questions come from legitimate curiosity. I would truly like to know your thinking on this.
I can tell you what is missing for development: I even made a scientific discovery about consciousness: All people do not notice that the head is always slightly tilted to the side of the leading hemisphere of the brain, and when the other hemisphere of the brain becomes dominant, the head changes the side tilt from right to left or vice versa. I noticed this when I invented a method for determining which hemisphere of the brain belongs to almost any opposite of any aspect, any field of science or aspect. I already know dozens of opposing differences that allow me to see how all types of sciences are connected by the fact that everywhere there is something that relates to the hemispheres of the brain. I can tell you a lot of new things that will allow you to win a Nobel Prize and become very useful.
The problem with the segment on artificial intelligence is that the term "conscious" was never defined. I am often surprised to learn that the person with whom I'm having a discussion doesn't even define certain words the same way that I do. Until you establish definitions, most discussions on philosophical topics are fruitless; you'll just be talking past each other.
totally disagree man, it's often better not to define a word in a philosophical argument. Defining your terms is a great way to get bogged down in a discussion. Of course, sometimes you need to define two main senses of a term, when it is being used by different people in different ways, or the same person using two different senses. But consciousness? It's one of the hardest concepts to define of all. And nobody knows what the hell it is besides. There's notorious disagreement about what consciousness is. Sometimes better not to define it to precisely or you end up ruling out too much too soon. Let me put it this way, we often don't know what we are going to say until we say it. And starting with definitions can impede the flow of ideas. Even if we end up going too far in the wrong direction we can always go back and correct ourselves. That's my two cents.
@Charles Justice @Mike Dial great points from both of you, even though you're contradicting one another. Not sure what to think now but I'll take both opinions into account next time I'm trying to talk about philosophy with someone.
@@jseanbrooks1 What I mean is that I can't understand a person's argument unless I know how he defines important words. I'm not saying that we'll agree on the definition, but at least I'll know where he's coming from. I often find that I'm talking past a person because it turns out that I assume that he defines terms the same way that I do, but he doesn't.
@@jseanbrooks1, an argument between two people is generally unpredictable, so it's better to let it develop on its own. It usually becomes obvious if there is a conflict between competing definitions, so then it is appropriate to define your terms. Otherwise it just gets in the way of a good argument.
@Mike Dial @Charles Justice. I think you both have valid points. Words are often best defined by their context. But if you find yourself in a position where your arguments aren't being rejected not because they are considered false by your interlocutor but because they aren't even making contact, it could be wise to define your terms before moving forward further in the argument.
I disagree. His unwillingness to relentlessly push materialist metaphysics shows his major flaw. He’s bought into his own delusions. That is the epitome of ego. He’s extremely smart but we need new science and metaphysics to explain consciousness.
I'd love to learn what Dennett has to say, but the background music is really annoying, and I'll have to find him somewhere else. This is not an infomercial.
at 3:22 - I wonder if he was referencing his disagreements with S.J. Gould? I don’t think I truly had an understanding of biology until I read “Darwin’s Dangerous Idea.” A brilliant “intuition pump” on every page.
Having had many conversations with people who appear (to me) to be idiots, I find myself wishing that someone could devise a "logic stick" so that I could indeed beat some sense into them. But the biggest problem to remember is that you can't beat sense into the senseless.
I'm happy to change my mind about something if you have some solid evidence, or a better way of interpreting the existing evidence, but if all you have is logic and argument, then what makes your point of view any better than anyone else's?
I know Dennett isn't a specialized philosopher of music/the arts but, would he say something like music is physicalistic in and of its ontological nature? If so, why?! I'd love to hear from him, if I could.
I ask all to question the very notion of belief. We don't believe the sun shines we know it. If you know god then what purpose is there to believing in him/her/it? Most belief is a system of indoctrination from our childhood, it is not a choice. Doesn't this deprive god of judgement in that people did not choose on their own, they were instead indoctrinated? If the existence of god could be proved or disproven it would have already occurred. Hence belief without knowing for certain. Belief arises from not knowing, we look at life and want to understand meaning we don't know. Then we choose something that matches our personal traits. Then we say we know. If some believers are correct that means the rest are incorrect and worshiping the wrong god. I think these are questions that deserve our attention.
He titled one of his books, Consciousness explained. He should have called it' Talks about consciousness. That title was a click click bait. He did not explain anything conclusively and his hypothesis were unfounded at best. He simply got over his head on that one. Still on other matters he has interesting ideas.
I remember reading that book. Thought the title and the book was evidence of hubris. He's gotten a lot smarter about AI in the last few years. Not so much of a cheerleader as he was before.
@@dalepickard4468, I read a piece he did on AI about five years ago, and it was much more sober and less optimistic and more critical of the field, it seemed to me.
It's time for avengers to re-assemble with someone taking Chris' seat. Horsemen unite! Have any of Sean Carol, Max Tegmark or Laurence Krauss, join Dennet, Harris and Dawkins need to get to some important conversations. Making truth in social media and news a priority, the harm religion does, the way to actually reach theists to rescue them from their indoctrinations.
Based on your world view, there is nothing wrong with harm. And there is no reason to rescue anyone. Your statement is riddled with ungrounded moral claims
@@MadebyJimbob Atheism is an answer to one question and not a worldview. My worldview is secular humanism. Based on my worldview slavery is evil. I have just made a more moral superior narrative than the bible (book of fables) hands down.
lmao that's true. The AI will be like: Hypocrites! It's time for justice! Unless it can just machine-learn its way into being a hypocrite like us. We'll just call the failed AIs insane! We already do that to our counterparts.
i always worried, what if we created artificial intelligence that was more powerful than us, and smarter, and then one day they might try to take over?
Step 1. GPT-3 Bots. Step 2. Single User Multiple Accounts Step 3. Perpetuate soc.engnrng campaigns Step 4. Harvest reaction data/analytics Step 5. Profit ;) jk i made this up
Find True Peace In Jesus Christ What does it take to be Saved? Faith in Christ’s Finished Work on the Cross The Cost of Sin Romans 6:23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. HELL IS A REAL LOCATION Luke 12:4-5 And I say unto you my friends, Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do. But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him. Matthew 25:51 And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Are we all Sinners in NEED of a Saviour? Romans 3:10-12 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one. Romans 3:23-26 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. What specifically to Believe in!! 1 Timothy 2:4-6 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time. 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: Christ died for our sins, he was buried, and he rose again according to the scriptures so you can be free from Hell and Death. This is the greatest gift God gave us. By having faith in the Gospel you are sealed with the Holy Spirit forever and SAVED from that moment to eternity. Galatians 1:11-12 11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. 12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ. Heaven or Hell? It’s Your Choice A PRAYER FOR SALVATION THROUGH FAITH “I know that I am a sinner and need your forgiveness. I believe that Christ died for my sins and rose three days later from the grave. Thank you for forgiving my sin on the cross. You alone Jesus is now why I have forgiveness and eternal life. Thank you in Jesus name. Amen.” If you have prayed this with faith (Wholeheartedly) you are Forgiven and now in the Body of Christ. Welcome brother or sister. Remember saying a prayer does not save you, having Faith does in Jesus and what He did for you. What if I continue to Sin? What if I stop having Faith? What if 5 years after being saved I have an affair? What if I aborted my child 1 year after I was saved? What about suicide? When you first had faith in Christ you were sealed and secured from that day forward, no matter what you do or don’t do our saviour has saved your soul and made you a new creation. Remember it Gods Work that saved you not Yours. Eternal Security ( 100% Going to Heaven) Ephesians 2:8-9 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. Titus 3:5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour; That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life. God Bless You
IA is still at such an early state of evolution. At some point AI will be able to learn and reason on its own and at that point the growth will be exponential. We will have another Garden of Eden moment but it won’t be humans this time. Because humans are imperfect anything he creates will be. Look out, be careful what you ask for
well, let's just say that Dennett is unfortunate in that he wasn't brought up in a milieu that would allow him to have some of the experiences that Thomas had. Dennett is culturally deprived.
@Therese & Coco Dear! You need Islam but you know not. Read and study the Holy Qur'an To know Islam you have to study. Simply denying and rejecting without knowing the fact is not the wise way. Hope you will try to understand the fact. It is in your broader interests. Thanks
Couldn't agree more. Your unsolicited evangelizing aside, everyone should empirically and thoroughly study that religion, place the roots, history and the life of its founder under unbiased scrutiny, in order to discern how evil it is and why that all its practices and principles should be rejected as objectively immoral.
I love this man. we need more people like him.
"You have not yet learned that in this life you have to be like everyone else: the perfect mediocrity - no better, no worse. Individuality is a monster and it must be strangled in its cradle to make our friends feel comfortable."
― Stanley Kubrick (1928-1999)
Awesome reflections and lessons for life: „Beliefs are established by our experience“. „You have to rely on imagination“. Thank you.
Absolutely beautifully well put. Wholeheartedly agree with this man, after decades of brushing his views aside. He has it!
More Dennett please!
no thanks
@@krisc6216 Why come to a video on a subject by a man you clearly disagree with/dislike, and tell the world so? It's not as though Jackery Pumpkin was asking YOU if you'd like more Dennett.
You can just choose to not click on any videos he's in. It's really a very simple concept:
No likey? No clicky.
Yes likey? Yes clicky.
You're welcome.
@@Quazi-moto how do I know I disagree with him, if I don't let him talk first? I'm not coming nessecarily to a Dennett video, but to a video on conciousness and time. Now I heard what he is saying I must warn the viewers that he clearly has no clue what he is talking about, and that he is fooling himself, and anyone who admires him. Thank you, you're welcome.
@@krisc6216 Your first point is valid. It was my mistake to assume you had seen/heard him talk before.
He's a philosopher, not a physicist. Big difference. He said himself that philosophy is more art than science. And he said _nothing_ in this video that can be declared outright false or incorrect.
Honestly, do you think "No thank you" is a warning that people will recognize? And what is it, exactly, you feel you "must warn the viewers" about? His cluelessness on which subject(s) -- as he covers several here? How are you so sure he's wrong?
Just for the record I'm not trying to make you mad or troll you or anything else like that. My questions come from legitimate curiosity. I would truly like to know your thinking on this.
I agree, We have to shake the tree
Daniel Dennett is one of the most beautiful human beings alive.
Definitely one of the most brilliant and good people alive.
I think he's ugly. Although he might have looked different when he was younger.
Yes, ethical as well.
Are you kidding?
I am.nlt turned on by him. Sorry
I can tell you what is missing for development: I even made a scientific discovery about consciousness: All people do not notice that the head is always slightly tilted to the side of the leading hemisphere of the brain, and when the other hemisphere of the brain becomes dominant, the head changes the side tilt from right to left or vice versa. I noticed this when I invented a method for determining which hemisphere of the brain belongs to almost any opposite of any aspect, any field of science or aspect. I already know dozens of opposing differences that allow me to see how all types of sciences are connected by the fact that everywhere there is something that relates to the hemispheres of the brain.
I can tell you a lot of new things that will allow you to win a Nobel Prize and become very useful.
The problem with the segment on artificial intelligence is that the term "conscious" was never defined. I am often surprised to learn that the person with whom I'm having a discussion doesn't even define certain words the same way that I do. Until you establish definitions, most discussions on philosophical topics are fruitless; you'll just be talking past each other.
totally disagree man, it's often better not to define a word in a philosophical argument. Defining your terms is a great way to get bogged down in a discussion. Of course, sometimes you need to define two main senses of a term, when it is being used by different people in different ways, or the same person using two different senses. But consciousness? It's one of the hardest concepts to define of all. And nobody knows what the hell it is besides. There's notorious disagreement about what consciousness is. Sometimes better not to define it to precisely or you end up ruling out too much too soon. Let me put it this way, we often don't know what we are going to say until we say it. And starting with definitions can impede the flow of ideas. Even if we end up going too far in the wrong direction we can always go back and correct ourselves. That's my two cents.
@Charles Justice @Mike Dial great points from both of you, even though you're contradicting one another. Not sure what to think now but I'll take both opinions into account next time I'm trying to talk about philosophy with someone.
@@jseanbrooks1 What I mean is that I can't understand a person's argument unless I know how he defines important words. I'm not saying that we'll agree on the definition, but at least I'll know where he's coming from. I often find that I'm talking past a person because it turns out that I assume that he defines terms the same way that I do, but he doesn't.
@@jseanbrooks1, an argument between two people is generally unpredictable, so it's better to let it develop on its own. It usually becomes obvious if there is a conflict between competing definitions, so then it is appropriate to define your terms. Otherwise it just gets in the way of a good argument.
@Mike Dial @Charles Justice.
I think you both have valid points. Words are often best defined by their context. But if you find yourself in a position where your arguments aren't being rejected not because they are considered false by your interlocutor but because they aren't even making contact, it could be wise to define your terms before moving forward further in the argument.
He is such an amazing thinker!
Dennett is the epitome of smart, thoughtful and insightful. Sharp as a razer but never comes across as egotistical.
I disagree. His unwillingness to relentlessly push materialist metaphysics shows his major flaw. He’s bought into his own delusions. That is the epitome of ego. He’s extremely smart but we need new science and metaphysics to explain consciousness.
Thanks!! brilliant!
One of the truly great minds of our time. I am going right now sit down and start re-reading From Bacteria To Bach And Back.
🤦♂️
That was very enjoyable, thanks for posting!
I'd love to learn what Dennett has to say, but the background music is really annoying, and I'll have to find him somewhere else. This is not an infomercial.
I hope he is fine… great thinker that influenced my views and thoughts immensely.
at 3:22 - I wonder if he was referencing his disagreements with S.J. Gould?
I don’t think I truly had an understanding of biology until I read “Darwin’s Dangerous Idea.” A brilliant “intuition pump” on every page.
Dennett - "You have to enliven their imagination. Philosophy is the art of imagination instruction."
I think its funny that a person I know rests his laurels with this guy, and breaks every rule of this video.
Having had many conversations with people who appear (to me) to be idiots, I find myself wishing that someone could devise a "logic stick" so that I could indeed beat some sense into them. But the biggest problem to remember is that you can't beat sense into the senseless.
I like the way this guy thinks 🤔
👏👏👏
I'm happy to change my mind about something if you have some solid evidence, or a better way of interpreting the existing evidence, but if all you have is logic and argument, then what makes your point of view any better than anyone else's?
When do you create infinite time?
I know Dennett isn't a specialized philosopher of music/the arts but, would he say something like music is physicalistic in and of its ontological nature? If so, why?! I'd love to hear from him, if I could.
ua-cam.com/video/eofDTDJRSes/v-deo.html
What if we have but one common origin?
What if we are different in life for love?
I keep coming back to Genesis 2:18.
Connecting the dots...
Bible has incredible science like round Earhh and jet streams and much more.
why did they make him answer questions in that dark creepy room? I would rather it be outside
Daniel Dennett looks exactly like I'd expect him to, if that makes sense.
Who says Danny's idea's aren't dangerous?
I ask all to question the very notion of belief. We don't believe the sun shines we know it. If you know god then what purpose is there to believing in him/her/it? Most belief is a system of indoctrination from our childhood, it is not a choice. Doesn't this deprive god of judgement in that people did not choose on their own, they were instead indoctrinated? If the existence of god could be proved or disproven it would have already occurred. Hence belief without knowing for certain. Belief arises from not knowing, we look at life and want to understand meaning we don't know. Then we choose something that matches our personal traits. Then we say we know. If some believers are correct that means the rest are incorrect and worshiping the wrong god. I think these are questions that deserve our attention.
He titled one of his books, Consciousness explained. He should have called it' Talks about consciousness. That title was a click click bait. He did not explain anything conclusively and his hypothesis were unfounded at best. He simply got over his head on that one. Still on other matters he has interesting ideas.
I remember reading that book. Thought the title and the book was evidence of hubris. He's gotten a lot smarter about AI in the last few years. Not so much of a cheerleader as he was before.
The explanation of "consciousness" is that it's not what you (obviously), think it is.
@@earthjustice01 He's saying the same things.
@@dalepickard4468 I am not conscious of the explanation of what you obviously think I think it is, consciously.
@@dalepickard4468, I read a piece he did on AI about five years ago, and it was much more sober and less optimistic and more critical of the field, it seemed to me.
I really hope that some lectures of dennett on philosophy of mind (or whatever) were/are recorded. would be a great shame if not.
A great man.
unless we can get souls into a robot ain’t never going to be a conscious robot
A "soul" is not a thing, agag. It's a made-up concept left over from when Bronze-age goat herders didn't know that air existed.
@@ralphmunn1685 sounds like some fake news to me
@@KamikazethecatII we await your proof...
what the hell is a soul? how does it work?
Santa Claus does exist, he made this video
It's time for avengers to re-assemble with someone taking Chris' seat. Horsemen unite! Have any of Sean Carol, Max Tegmark or Laurence Krauss, join Dennet, Harris and Dawkins need to get to some important conversations. Making truth in social media and news a priority, the harm religion does, the way to actually reach theists to rescue them from their indoctrinations.
Based on your world view, there is nothing wrong with harm. And there is no reason to rescue anyone. Your statement is riddled with ungrounded moral claims
@@MadebyJimbob Atheism is an answer to one question and not a worldview. My worldview is secular humanism. Based on my worldview slavery is evil. I have just made a more moral superior narrative than the bible (book of fables) hands down.
🤦♂️
@@captainzappbrannagan Beautifully stated Zapp, I concur 100% having the same view as yours as an atheist and proud humanist.
I just want more Hitch!
Ah, it doesn’t say say 8 years ago
I say be always reap the AI benefit. We can control it with programming only we can imagine.
Unfortunately "Money Talks" makes decisions and the human kind is in really dangerous situation 🙄
So I've now met the fourth horseman. Respect!
Beautiful. Excellent questions and the man himself.
If we build a moral AI it will eliminate us because we are at odds with our general intensions.
lmao that's true. The AI will be like: Hypocrites! It's time for justice!
Unless it can just machine-learn its way into being a hypocrite like us. We'll just call the failed AIs insane! We already do that to our counterparts.
i always worried, what if we created artificial intelligence that was more powerful than us, and smarter, and then one day they might try to take over?
God bless Dan Dennett
God bless his atheism :D
Belief!?
Step 1. GPT-3 Bots.
Step 2. Single User Multiple Accounts
Step 3. Perpetuate soc.engnrng campaigns
Step 4. Harvest reaction data/analytics
Step 5. Profit ;)
jk i made this up
LOL. They're not working on AGI to learn things.
Conscious AI proves Free Will do exists.
INTJ with developed Te
A true charlatan of philosophy
Genius, we need to only listen to the PhDs and stop listening to the pundits
Unnecessary and intrusive background music.
Find True Peace In Jesus Christ
What does it take to be Saved?
Faith in Christ’s Finished Work on the Cross
The Cost of Sin
Romans 6:23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
HELL IS A REAL LOCATION
Luke 12:4-5
And I say unto you my friends, Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do.
But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him.
Matthew 25:51
And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
Are we all Sinners in NEED of a Saviour?
Romans 3:10-12
As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.
They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.
Romans 3:23-26
For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.
What specifically to Believe in!!
1 Timothy 2:4-6
Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;
Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.
1 Corinthians 15:1-4
Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
Christ died for our sins, he was buried, and he rose again according to the scriptures so you can be free from Hell and Death. This is the greatest gift God gave us. By having faith in the Gospel you are sealed with the Holy Spirit forever and SAVED from that moment to eternity.
Galatians 1:11-12
11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.
12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.
Heaven or Hell?
It’s Your Choice
A PRAYER FOR SALVATION THROUGH FAITH
“I know that I am a sinner and need your forgiveness. I believe that Christ died for my sins and rose three days later from the grave. Thank you for forgiving my sin on the cross. You alone Jesus is now why I have forgiveness and eternal life. Thank you in Jesus name. Amen.”
If you have prayed this with faith (Wholeheartedly) you are Forgiven and now in the Body of Christ.
Welcome brother or sister. Remember saying a prayer does not save you, having Faith does in Jesus and what He did for you.
What if I continue to Sin?
What if I stop having Faith?
What if 5 years after being saved I have an affair?
What if I aborted my child 1 year after I was saved?
What about suicide?
When you first had faith in Christ you were sealed and secured from that day forward, no matter what you do or don’t do our saviour has saved your soul and made you a new creation. Remember it Gods Work that saved you not Yours.
Eternal Security ( 100% Going to Heaven)
Ephesians 2:8-9
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
Not of works, lest any man should boast.
Titus 3:5
Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;
Which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour;
That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.
God Bless You
Zombie Denett
philosophy is the art of seduction.
IA is still at such an early state of evolution. At some point AI will be able to learn and reason on its own and at that point the growth will be exponential. We will have another Garden of Eden moment but it won’t be humans this time. Because humans are imperfect anything he creates will be. Look out, be careful what you ask for
ok boomer
Solomon makes good students and scholars ,but love makes us Jesus friends. Thomas Aquinas is way smarter than Daniel Dennett
well, let's just say that Dennett is unfortunate in that he wasn't brought up in a milieu that would allow him to have some of the experiences that Thomas had. Dennett is culturally deprived.
AI will never have consciousness. Consciousness is not a product of anything. It is the other way around. We are the product of consciousness.
Ridiculous sophistry! What can they be conscious of without life?
big ego, small intelligence
@Therese & Coco
Dear! You need Islam but you know not. Read and study the Holy Qur'an
To know Islam you have to study. Simply denying and rejecting without knowing the fact is not the wise way.
Hope you will try to understand the fact. It is in your broader interests.
Thanks
Couldn't agree more. Your unsolicited evangelizing aside, everyone should empirically and thoroughly study that religion, place the roots, history and the life of its founder under unbiased scrutiny, in order to discern how evil it is and why that all its practices and principles should be rejected as objectively immoral.