Electricity Myths

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @cw2818
    @cw2818 Рік тому +1

    The best layman's explanations of electronics I've heard and seen in years. Keep up the great work professor.

  • @mscir
    @mscir 8 місяців тому

    Great class, thank you. You're really good at this, better than some of the teachers I had at the local JC.

  • @ijexcmos8153
    @ijexcmos8153 8 місяців тому +1

    Well done! 👍

  • @assabjorn
    @assabjorn 15 днів тому

    For example in a slayer Tesla coil

  • @assabjorn
    @assabjorn 16 днів тому

    Teach me all ❤

  • @jhgpsimons
    @jhgpsimons Рік тому +1

    I got some jackie chan vibes at the end. But... very nice video, thanks!

  • @cnccontroller
    @cnccontroller 7 місяців тому

    Interesting as always, thank you very much.

  • @assabjorn
    @assabjorn 16 днів тому

    I’m so into Tesla I hope my professor ❤

  • @assabjorn
    @assabjorn 15 днів тому

    I know this is maybe a stupid question but but I wanna know more about Pnp it’s a hmm things I wonder about

  • @atheistaetherist2747
    @atheistaetherist2747 Рік тому +1

    Everything is photons. There is no such thing as a solid little nut (electron) orbiting a nucleus. Hence the problem of radiation during acceleration duznt exist.
    In an atom, what we have is a photon orbiting a nucleus. Let us name this an elektron. It has a negative charge. It radiates, & radiation needs energy. But, that radiation is little different to ordinary radiation that radiates from every photon all the time for ever. The energy comes from the aether, we dont know how. Elektrons migrating along in a wire give us (a slow) elektricity.
    When a photon forms a loop (by biting its own tail) then it makes an electron. Electrons have a negative charge. Electrons can sit on & migrate on a surface -- or fly throo space - they give us static charge -- & movement (on a surface)(or through space) gives us (a slow) electricity.
    The acceleration of an electron needs the input of energy. And apparently the acceleration of an electron needs additional input of energy to replace energy radiated by the acceleration.
    What standard science calls electricity in a wire is actually due to photons hugging the surface of a wire. Let us name these elektons. Elektons have a negative charge. Elektons propagate at the speed of light, & give us (fast) elekticity.
    Elektons & elektrons propagate at the speed of light all the time for ever, so in that sense there can be no acceleration of the propagation. But, elektons & elektrons can be made to change course or move or migrate, & i don’t know whether this requires input of energy.
    And, we have (fast) Elekticity, & (slow) Elektricity, & (slow) Electricity -- 3 kinds.
    And we can add the ionic form of (slow) electricity, where negative ions migrate -- this needs a new name -- iontricity praps.
    And we can add the positive ionic form of (slow) electricity, where positive ions migrate -- this needs a new name -- positricity praps.
    And if in the positricity the positive ions are simply protons then this needs a new sub-name -- protricity praps. So, we have 6 kinds of electricity.

    • @HunzolEv
      @HunzolEv Рік тому

      Bob definitely knows the limits. But try explaining all those to the average Joe. Einstein quote "If you ca...

    • @entcraft44
      @entcraft44 Рік тому +4

      That is a bunch of smart sounding pseudoscience with just enough actual science to be convincing.

    • @atheistaetherist2747
      @atheistaetherist2747 Рік тому +1

      @@entcraft44
      My elekticity on a wire ticks all of the boxes.

    • @douggale5962
      @douggale5962 Рік тому +3

      You should go overturn physics and collect your Nobel prize and all that. Everyone would have to re-explain why all their working electronics worked with all the wrong physics.

    • @atheistaetherist2747
      @atheistaetherist2747 Рік тому

      @@douggale5962
      Yes we would need to explain how stuff works despite wrong physics.
      But, with my correct physics, we should be able to advance further sooner.
      I could get say 3 Nobels.
      For example -- i know that radio is not photons, & photons are not radio.