OSHO: Tolerance Is an Ugly Word
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 січ 2021
- "The people who talk about tolerance are the most intolerant people." Osho
============================================
A new full length talk available everyday. Plus a collection of talks on subjects that matter to you: love, meditation, psychology, emotions, sex, money, power and many others. Sign up to enjoy all this and more!
Click the JOIN button or use this link to activate your membership / @oshointernational
============================================
Choose a playlist with subtitles in your language here ua-cam.com/users/OSHOInternati...
============================================
Revolutionary Online courses from Osho www.osho.com/osho-internation...
============================================
© OSHO International Foundation
© OSHO is a registered trademark of OSHO International Foundation
#OSHO #OSHOtalks #Meditation
Enjoy _watching & listening_ to *OSHO TALKS* ? Now, _new full length talks_ *available everyday* on this channel. Sign up to _experience the full impact_ of OSHO TALKS. Click the *JOIN button* or use this link to activate your membership ua-cam.com/channels/S0s6BFzIcvC2gTH52_vBEA.htmljoin
Ramu kaka can understand ..... ਓਸ਼ੋ 🙏
Hi please share the link of full video
Please upload osho vedio on tarot cards... Please
@@vinayakparab6517 Perhaps you are interested in this video? *OSHO: Oracles, Tarot and Other Divination Tools* ➡ ua-cam.com/video/DsjoZaBc-0w/v-deo.html 💕
Hello@Chesar6277 , Actually more than 200 books available to read online at the *OSHO Online Library* ❤ www.osho.com/library ❤
"The people who talk about tolerance, are the most intolerant people" I feel that, down to every bit of my bones...
When someone can so accurately predict the future, you know that their getting something right. Lets not forget, to develop a thesis that can predict the future is the essence of science.
As someone who is from Venezuela I understand everything he said here, I no longer tolerate Marxist y accept they are stupid but won’t tolerate their stupid ideology being force to me and Americans should do that before is to late
My fandom will tolerate that statement >:D
Yup
@@coyunotattooer8597feeling is mutual. i no longer tolerate dumb ass capitalists and their exploitative ways. American capitalism is the reason your country is a shithole.
Yes, tolerance basically means you're just putting up with a person or people so the hostility is there.
so we shouldnt tolerate but accept
@@dp1453 We should either accept or openly criticise all those things that we refuse to accept...fair and sincere indeed!
@@dp1453 Only if they deserve acceptance.
There isn't necessarily a better alternative that is doable in a real situation. Abandoning people isn't necessarily made into a good idea by literally any and all legacy issues.
Wrong.
Tolerance = restrained hostility. This man is wise beyond words. Love him!
"The people who talk about tolerance are the most intolerant people"
Describes Liberals/Leftists/Democrats to a tee.
@@John-X Yes when we have greavances, we should kill one or another... Tolerance for what...
@@John-X don't tolerate those who are intolerant
@@John-X surely the fascists are a tolerant bunch right
@@8pija22 Yup, people who actually believe what you typed are fundamentally logically compromised.
One of the scariest moments during this pandemic was when the Canadian Prime minister asked if we should tolerate the unvaccinated , now I know why I was so alarmed by it.
Yeah that was crazy. I can't believe we would tolerate them. They are nothing but plaguerats who spread disease and kill people.
This is why tolerance is an ugly word, when used in regard to people. It is just a curtain that covers rejection and hate, which he was implying. The word tolerant implies the one who tolerates is burdened.
Patience is a purer word which is sometimes wrongly thought in the same way. It means you accept what you cannot rush, including people. You can show love through patience, because unlike tolerance it does not have to hide a burden
Well I think everything in life needs balance. When it comes to what you said vs people tolerating BLM looting. Or narscisstic family members, boss, managers their needs to have a balance. The fact your sociopath prime Minister said that bout HALF of Canada's population, of course it should be obvious how toxic that I'd. And the fact you bone heads fall for it is why many people don't even desire being around other humans is bc their are so many mini dictator sociopaths trying to control narratives. Lol dude litterly could have started a civil war with that one comment.
PS don't ever tolerate double standard friends, family boss sick sociopaths lol
Lies again? Zero Tolerance
Osho is increasingly relevant in present days, he is very bold,straight and Firm thinker ever existed in the world
True, I mean such revolutionary thinking in the 80s, he could have changed the world today
he's not a thinker - doesn't come from a thinking process
He was the director of the philosophy department of some university in India (can't remember which one) just at 21 yo. He realized himself around that age - he quit his role as a teacher and entered in silence. An old man urged him to find words to speak the truth. He accepted the old man's wish and started talking. But it's not philosophy. It's not thinking. It's not logical. It is born out of pure awareness - only factual witnessing. No thinking here at all.
YES, GOOD COMMENT !
Vipin Kumar they couldnt tolerate themselves
I'm intrigued not by Osho but by the maturity of the interviewer. His ability to propose an opposing view without being contentious or adversarial to his interviewee. Such skill and maturity doesn't exist anymore. So called journalists are people who interview first with their own political views. Taking any difference in opinion as a personal affront. Ah the suicide of western society.
Was trying to ignore that today, but then I read this comment. To be fair, I doubt wilful ignorance leads to much in the way of bliss...
Yeah these days, we basically train ourselves to ignore the interviewer since they are almost always trying to push an opposing view rather than conduct a fair interview.
to agree with someone's lie is also a non-existent "gregarious" lie, embarrassing excuse ... agree, greed(y), aggregate, a/egregor, aggression, ager (a field in Latin), agriculture (Kain's murder's sign), Greece = concentration camps = city states = ciudad = fratricide, genocide, suicide ... faith is víra, viera (similar like Latin virus, right? virtual reality ...) in Slavic languages, similar is vír = whirl, vortex, to vore ... a reckless unconscious "god-like" power without brain, kills you like the lamp the insects, who also blindly brainlessly are attracted to the "power", death ... like water vortex, tornado ...
@@labakanurzidil2464 You're arguing from semantics, and that's not very relevant here
He choked at the Jesus part.
Tolerance means putting hostilties under the rug. The hostilities are still there, just waiting to burst out in the open as soon as you put a foot on them.
This is why people who disagree at a fundamental level should never be forced to coexist in the same place: it will only increase the tension and, eventually, result in violence.
We don't have much choice in the matter
the powers-that-be r constantly forcing Mass immigration and other things they just won't let us live and maintain a decent Society
Disagreement means there is either subjectivity or ignorance at play. Learning to accept differing opinions or that some people are ignorant is the solution. Hiding your head in the sand is just another form of sweeping hostilities under the rug.
Sometimes being forced to interact with the people you dislike can actually bridge those gaps. Think for example, how much more ignorant and racist we would be if in communities there weren't any other races. Prior to going to international school, as a child, white people were taught to me as being bullies of the Chinese, but after highschool interacting with all races of people helped me see that race is just race and people are still people. Not always applicable of course, but I think theres merit in that.
@@skachor "Accept differing opinions" just means live with cognitive dissonance for the rest of your life. Objective reality exists.
this is where respect comes in. don't hide the fact you don't like someone or disagree with someone. At least respect them.
What a man! The fact that those interviews were recorded is a gift!
Cross my path
😂
Exactly! this is where the realization starting to happen.
"People who talk about tolerance are the most intolerant."
Wise words and truer than ever.
There is something about the slow but steady way he talks, and always speaks succinctly with little wasted words
The opposite of a bureaucratic talk
Didn't think I'd bump into a Hirasawa fan haha.
@@halnine9576 Maybe we're here because we both seek wisdom. Susumu and Osho are both sages in their own ways, concerned with spiritual truth and humanity
@@KuraSourTakanHour Lack of hostility means a lack of balance... his ideals are total bunk.
He speaks very fast in Hindi speeches. Maybe English was not his first language, that's why he have different speaking pattern in English.
"Tolerance means we have decided there is no possibility for any bridges."
Think about that.
No
You're not my supervisor!
No I actually click on videos like this specifically to not think about what they say.
Except it is the opposite, it is accepting that other people are different. There are no alternatives.
Interesting point of view indeed
"Criticize out of compassion"
I felt that.
I like how he finishes every sentence with "sssshhh"
Like evil wizard, lol. But jokes aside, he's absolutely enigmatic.
It's all a part of his guru "I know the way this is all very profound give me your credit card info" shtick.. He is right about his analysis of the hostility behind the word though
I have heard that in Kabbala you are to pronounce s as a snake...szzzz ,sort of, don't remember the details but its something like a universal language...something like tibetan syllables Ohm etc.
@@largecoke4087
I do the same, and it's because English is not my first language. I accentuate certain sounds, specifically S.
This is one of the most beautiful, insightful conversation I've ever heard on the subject of tolerance. The interviewer certainly had a seekers mentality and asked the right questions that triggered Osho to give accurate responses. Simply beautiful ❤️
Accurate 💯 I watched it twice infact
Bunch of nonsense.
@@bernardbober7300 no
This is what I've thought for years. In fact I specifically remember a test question in social studies related to tolerance that I got wrong because I hold this exact view. Man's a legend
He's so right... just listen to the word Tolerance. You can feel the Hostility in it!!
It is not the word in itself that speaks of hostility, but the actions needed for it, to tolerate you need to not find any enjoyment in it, it is estranged it's uncomfortable, it is something you dislike, with a passion. It is not something good, you can accept that you are different from something else, you don't need to tolerate it. I'll give a good materialistic example, not a spiritual one, let's say you acknowledge the existence of child molestation, you accept that it's a fact, but you do not like it, and you would never tolerate it, because it's so vile to you, that you only see it as an evil act done by evil people, why should you tolerate it, there's nothing to tolerate, if you saw it occurring you'd do anything to stop it, even other evil acts you would never do otherwise, such as murdering another person, because in your mind you don't see these evil acts as equally evil, one is worse than the other, and in that moment the thing you tolerate is murder, not because you want to tolerate it, but because you have to tolerate it.
That is why tolerance is a vile concept, you only need tolerance when you need it as an excuse to do something you yourself do not want to do, but is forced to do, only then is tolerance acceptable, it is a tool, not a good tool, it's an evil tool, it's how we come to terms with doing evil actions.
A lot of people that do evil deeds, do it out of tolerance, and it's not tolerance of others, but tolerance of oneself.
To understand the underlying fact that you yourself is the evil, and that's the only time you need to tolerate something, but you shouldn't accept that you're evil, but understand and be aware that you have the potential for evil, yet you also have the potential to direct that evil, in a good way, and that you have the potential for good used in evil fashion.
It is not what others do which we should tolerate, others do abhorrent things, it is not ourselves that we should tolerate either, sometimes we have to but it is not out of happiness and ones self-worth, it is a begrudging thing to do. You need to tolerate things when you're powerless, you don't need to tolerate anything if you're powerful, why should you, you're powerful, others will tolerate you, or they'll face the consequences.
Have a great day, and may you find out more about the world and yourself, both good and bad, because only by knowing evil and good can one understand and be aware of ones actions.
@@livedandletdie Good example, I would clarify that currently molestation counts as sexual assault. Any killing done to intervene in an assault is often considered self defense, - even though your not defending 'yourself' in this case -. So ones actions likely would not technically be murder
Titties....a much better word.
Tolerance is the last virtue of a depraved society.
"there is no need for tolerance if there is no hostility" I've been looking for a way to word this concept for a long time now. - Lord Salvator
If a man breaks into your home and assaults your wife do you greet him with no hostility... no. that would be "retarded" as he so "eloquently" called the people who choose to vote. He thinks only in idealistic foolishness.
@@Wingnut353 He didn't say that we should love everyone. He even said that either he accepts someone, or forgets about that person entirely. What he said that in order to tolerate someone or something, you need hostility to begin with, because it is implied in the meaning of tolerance. When you tolerate someone, there is a presumption that you don't accept that person and disagree with her, and that otherwise you would have been hostile towards her, but you chose to "let her live" instead, in your fake generosity and "higher moral ground".
@@Wingnut353 it truly stunns me how someone can listen that much and understand so little
OSHO was born 40 years too early. I feel like the world still isn't quite ready for his teachings, but it's much closer now than it was then.
There wasn't brainwashing to tolerate 40 years before he was born. Now the word has become an almost sacred ideology and we are expected to tolerate that which no decent peoples should consider tolerating. There are moves to legalise paedophilia, for instance.
@@angr3819 you are totally blind and not alone unfortunately... no brainwashing 40 years ago????... here, I'm openly critical of your knowledge. Listen to lyrics in songs from 40 years ago and beyond. Read a book. Listen to Curtis Mayfield... Listen to the Doors. Listen to Iron Maiden. Listen to pink Floyd. Just listen.... to elders who are being silenced. Listen to Woodstock concert and its vision. Read Noam Chomsky. You have homework to do
@@angr3819 joined 1 year ago? Sorry I thought you were human!! Compute to the last digit, the last value of Pi
I agree 👍 and my one of friend say same thing but he said Osho 50 years ahead than these stupid politicians😆😭😄
Exactly! because in these days, there is an impact happening in the field of collective consciousness as a whole than before in the history.
The world needs Osho now, more than ever 🙏
Save yourself.
There is sadguru now, why u don't go under him
@@nambardarumeshgurjar519 no match with osho
Yes you are also budha. Just wake up. Otherwise the WHO ORG will kill us
Satguru also reads Osho
Love this dude. People get away with too much bad behavior by skirting responsibility and penalty under live and let live idealism. Respect is confrontation not tolerance.
Osho is the most FUTURISTIC man who always LIVED in the PRESENT moment.
there's no future, is always the present xD
He is and will be still the future for humanity bcoz humanity will again become non sense
Osho rarely blinks his eyes throughout the whole interview.
I've never seen the words of Lord Jesus about enemies that way. Very refreshing point! First you have to create enemies by being yourself, by speaking the truth and defending your identity and the truths you follow. Then these enemies can be loved by you. And loved doesn't mean tolerated but respected as human beings who can make their own decisions - good or bad - and embraced as potential brothers in Christ.
Thanks Osho!
I don't or will not accept people who make bad decisions that harm others. I don't want to love my enemies that's why they are enemies. If they change and show that they are worthy of forgiveness or redemption you cannot throw those around like they are trophies just for participation. I love good people and those willing to help and progress fellow humans and freedom and God.
@Sad-Lemon an enemy can be defined as "hostile towards someone else". To claim you have no enemies in this world is ignorance. Thank you for pointing out that by being himself, Christ had entire groups of people hostile towards him for simply loving them.
@amarathros6851
You do not have to like or support someone in order to love them. To love someone is to seek that person's good. Let's say your friend or child commits a crime and might spend the night in jail. The loving thing to do would be to let them face the consequences of their actions amd then present them with the opportunity to reconcile and make better decisions. Jesus certainly opposed and spoke against his enemies, but that in no way means that he did not love them.
the fact that you think you need to defend something made up
The older I get the more wisdom I have found in OSHO. When I was a young man I was taught to hate this man. I spent my youth brainwashed by the Western vvoman's value system that has brought us to where we are today.
I am a much wiser older man for breaking those chains and listening to what he is saying.
Truly is enlightening.
Tolerance is so condescending ! Thanks Osho for telling us what LOVE, FRIENDSHIP, BEAUTY AND TOGETHERNESS IS ❤️❤️❤️❤️
He's right. The people I've heard praising themselves as 'tolerant' e.g., here in Ontario, are the worst, most hostile people. I began wondering about that word several years ago, and I began to perceive this, that vicious, aggressive, downright bad people claim to be 'tolerant' as though it were some credit to themselves. These people play nice and put on a social act as teachers, firefigthers, police, church groups, etc, yet they are the most angry people, but it is well disguised; it only leaks out at times and around the edges.
It's not only about tolerance, they come up with all kinds of empty ideas. It is all to maintain their image and it's all they live for. Deplorable people.
Tolerance is enforced acceptance, and you can't enforce acceptance. Understanding is what matters.
“The people who talk about tolerance are the most intolerant.”
Damn bro, no need throw that right hook at the left like that 🤣
Clever word play
I know your comment is a year old but it can be said both ways, the right doesn't tolerate the existence of minorities and oppresses them, while the left doesn't tolerate discrimination, when he said that the people who want tolerance are usually intolerant themselves, he is right, but it also goes both ways, so i think we should tolerate everything that brings peace to the people, and be intolerant to what causes havoc, and even than it is complex, Its a moral's issue, rather than a tolerance issue.
@@hvnxtxr Don't be tolerant. Tolerance is restrained hostility. The people who talk about tolerance are the most intolerant. Tolerance basically means you're just putting up with a person or people, so the hostility is there. Also, what do you mean by the right oppresses minorities?
"Tolerance is love sick with the sickness of haughtiness." - Kahlil Gibran
"Tolerance and Apathy are the last virtues of a dying society" -Aristotle
Are we so lucky to experience that in our day... 🤔
_When people lose sight of the Tao,_
_codes of morality and justice are created._
_When cleverness and strategies are in use,_
_hypocrites are everywhere._
_When families forego natural harmony,_
_parents become pious and children become dutiful._
_When the nation is reigned by darkness,_
_patriotic advisers abound._
Tao te Ching ~ Lao Tzu
So, Osho read what Aristotle wrote 25 centuries ago.
You know, what I find interesting is that there truly are two sets of rules. One for the man of mediocrity (which is most people) and one for the spiritually enlightened, geniuses and masters. What I mean is, if you teach the mediocre man freedom, he's going to translate it in a mediocre way and think, 'yeah, it's midlife crisis time' (this particular man starts dying by the age of 40), then there are the enlightened who see freedom through the lens of responsibility, yet still is fully living a life of freedom.
" The people are retarded." ~Osho
Thanks for the laughs bro.
It's true. And it's not funny. Let's Go Brandon.
@@joeh858 Agrees with Osho, then becomes an example of his quote. That's hilarious
@@yamchayaku what makes you think 🤔 that you're not an example of his quote? Or me? Or all of us? What if Osho is in fact a Sith Lord?
@@yamchayaku How?
Agree
The fiercely brilliant jerk. He could make any beautiful word sound ugly and turn any talk about that ugliness into a most beautiful sermon. He was just playing around with all of it because his real philosophy, if there was any, was to go beyond both. I just love this crazy notorious genius who was and shall remain an invaluable gem among all men that ever lived. ❤️Osho❤️
❤️❤️❤️
What r u trying to say dear
I don’t think so- tolerance isn’t a beautiful world it means we don’t like something but we try to “tolerate it”. Thats not love. As he said he either accepts or he forgets - no need to tolerate something.
You should watch the video again and really listen to him without your mind running.
@@narendermakhijani9512 I'm trying to say that Osho's teaching or his philosophy or his position had very little to do with what tolerance does or does not mean. That is not what he was about. One would understand that only after reading way too many of his books and listening to a bloody lot of his talks. He always contradicted himself. He was doing that continuously for a purpose. Yet every time a novice listens to him they go "damn that's right. Tolerance is ugly" or similar about whatever he's talking at that instance. Well that's a very unique power of words he had. Doesn't mean his statements were literally true. I made that comment because to not understand that ever-present contradiction is to miss him completely.
The one REAL REBEL the world has witnessed in the past century.
Don't insult me.
and one certain austrian painter
“Tolerate means go to hell” that just blew up my brain….
This man would utterly annihilate the modern social justice cult!
YAH MAN, ND HE WAS POISONED BY THE U.S GOVM, FOR TELLING THE T.
I mean, if you actually take a deeper than surface level reading, he speaks about how friendship and love are important, and how everyone deserves the same freedoms. So he is in fact supporting the same ideas as social justice - equality, equity, freedom of individual expression. It is similar to the George Carlin bit that conservatives flock to because he "destroys Feminism" but if you actually listen to the full bit he is calling for intersectionality, which is still a leftist position and not a conservative one.
@@s13rra Fucking thank you for this
@@s13rra Equity? Where/when does he say that? Equity is not only impossible but criminal. How can there be both equity and freedom of individual expression? You are really out of your mind.
@@elijahbaley5556 Equity is moronic and criminal
The alternative to tolerance isn't violence
Its acceptance
It means "I condesend to "tolerate" you. And "You must tolerate different others as by my example".
Ive zero tolerance for tolerance
to tolerate someone is to agree to disagree. it doesn't give any room for growth or togetherness, that's a really clean way to put it.
Exactly. No need to tolerate anybody. This man is a genius.
My master.
Most misunderstood person during his presents.
Buddha's are bound to be misunderstood
I was about to correct you, but it might really be during his “presents”😉
@@ldthaprophet3340 i think he would be judged the same way today as back then when he lived. He probably would get a shitstorm and disrespecting memes about him. And just the same way he would smile it away, he has no need to get angry about such things ;) But i also believe more people would listen to him just because my generation (and younger even more) are a bit more sensitive about those things, at least from my expierience.
Why do I have to tolerate you, when you can't even tolerate me not tolerating you.
"tolerance is an ugly word. To tolerate implies you already have humiliated the other person. You are already holier, higher and more understanding. People if talk of tolerance are most intolerant people
Either you completely accept the person or you forget him, why tolerate? He has the right to be himself, I have the right to be myself there is no need to for any tolerance.. there is hostility in sound of tolerance. Already you have accepted that there is no possibility of friendship, being together lovingly. to
Tolerance is to SOMEHOW, live and let them live. It is certainly ugly word.
It is simply to cover up hostility " we don't tolerate anybody because we are not hostile in the first place. Jesus says love Ur enemies which implies u must first have enemies otherwise how can u love them?
I Accept their right to be themselves, I am not tolerating. I will criticise them if I feel it is wrong. I will criticise them out of love and compassion, because I am concerned about them. Tolerance simply means go to hell, we don't bother!
I love the freedom for myself and for themselves. They may be against me, but that doesn't make any difference. But I will fight for their freedom just like I will fight for myself and my freedom. Either someday I have to accept them or they have to accept me. Tolerance means there is no possibility of any bridge"
Dear Ritika
Thank u for ur work dear.
This is amazing explanation.
Best wishes from USA.
I used to go to his lectures in Bombay opposite Metro cinema
I am dung, and the man who imbibes foolishness... is less than dung.
i read this because im too lazy waiting for him to put out words, this guy is a wise man but the way he's talking makes me lose my sht
so thank you!
❤
There is no possibility there we have to tolerate people especially in a work environment, i have to tolerate my stupid coworker my supervisor and other people with hostility and existential problems just to make a living. THERE IS NO OTHER WAY! Tolerance is a gift in a work place it is what makes you superior to tolerate ugly people and to control them so that they will not harm you. Tolerance is a gift for me and a talent we all must have at some level.
I like whays he's saying mostly but not every enemy is one we created some people are just evil and will hurt at random. And we should not tolerate them but love them also
Tolerance is not the same as acceptance. To truly love, you must accept the other. Not tolerate them.
2:04, the style of Osho saying "tolerance" 🔥
No greater love than this... no greater Master that can put in the simplest language what all preceding him have meant. Osho takes nothing away from all the Masters but brings them to life in in the present moment with a crystal clear clarity. 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽💜💜💜
This guy really spoke a lot of truth and as much bullshit.
May it all pass through the great filter so we might glean some gold.
Be good to each other first, then disagree.
I notice the word tolerance being used in sentences like, "he tolerated her bad behavior." Basically to put up with negative/bad situations that you otherwise wouldn't want to be in.
Please share more with the world - it needs it right now... more than ever (2021).
And I know you may think, Osho said, that don’t give things for free, because people will not value it. I understand. And of course you don’t have to give the whole content for free, but Osho always gave without asking for something back, that why he „received much“.
Please share more, that people will get more and more into meditation....
It’s the only way to save humanity & this beautiful earth 🌏
Thank you
"Not giving for free" doesn't have to mean "giving for money". There's also "free as in freedom", which still might involve putting some effort in other ways.
Tolerance means putting up with something others do that you cannot truly agree with.
Wow, i am just blown away, hadn't thought of this, how deep. Acceptance is the true 'tolerance', tolerance is not acceptance and not acceptable in society. Everyone has to accept each other.
Tbf he banged it when he said look at the word tolerance. His right its an ugly word with hostility behind it.
the first line "to tolerate means you have already humiliated the other person" is the most profound and true thing I've heard in a long time.
wow
Beautiful! The choice is either accept with love or criticize with love! Tolerance is ugly!
So, are you saying that you're incapable of feeling anger, frustration, and hate toward any person for any reason whatsoever?
@@str82thepoint8 It would be beautiful, if no such emotions were there in us, isn't it? All I can say is that 'anger, frustration, hatred' hurt us big time for sure!!! The real question is do we want to continue hurting ourselves!!!
"There is no need for tolerance if there is no hostility. it is simply to cover up hostility" what an apt way of wording the problem in our society...
Bless the interviewer, his level of consciousness is not sufficient to hear Osho 🙏
Thx osho
Much love to everyone
What Osho is asking is a very difficult thing for a common man. He is saying you don’t need to tolerate an irritating person / situation etc but criticise him / her / situation with whatever you think is correct in your opinion but the condition is you must have a good feeling / intention at heart / mind for this person / situation. Eg. A mother scolding using harsh words for her kid who is about to harm himself. Here the words are harsh but the mother’s intention is good. A caring mother can’t tolerate ( say go to hell!) her kid going on a wrong path.
My question is how many of us can have a good feeling / motherly intention while criticising a person who is doing something against our methods / culture / ways of life ? Or simply become mother for the world! How many of us can do that?
This will come only by Vipassana meditation which needs years of hard work.
Yes very well explained. Meditation is important but first comes the knowledge of self - non-dualness which would then enlarge the heart of man to accept & criticize for others as Osho says because there are no others in real but just the shadow. So to bring that out into practice or is perhaps meditation at macro scale which should be the real task of any man of spirituality.
It requires a pure mind you’re right 👌
If you have to tolerate people means you don't want to understand them. When you understand people you don't need to tolerate.
He is so powerful because he is truth; tolerance is an ugly word.
The type of people who flash their OSHO books around are nothing like this guy, they're the polar opposite, I wonder if they even read the books?
Interesting i do have some osho books and and if i were exactly like him i would not be myself, but he had powerfull insights like this one, and i am gratefull for that.
WOW osho so wise beyond words.
I'd say this wasn't him being wise but everyone around being very stupid. It's sad he has to explain this, especially this long, for someone to understand this
Empathy is another anomaly. Empathy is a code word for struggling with our own difficulty to accept someone as they are, not a demonstration of compassion, mercy, to be altruistic somehow, or addressing our unjust attitude toward the person so in need of empathy.
Much of what is called mercy, tolerance, compassion, obfuscates what is in fact an effort to deny a person justice.
Tolerance is like saying, though we refuse to give you justice, we nevertheless, in spite of our inability to practice solidarity or be egalitarian toward you, allow you to exist.
I love Osho so much you cannot even imagine. I have almost 100 of his books the best master ever.
John Locke actually said similar things about “tolerance”
Beautiful and wise OSHO. So much love and gratitude ❤️🙏
so much depth for a human being,so as his life comes alive 👏
At first i thought this was going to be nonesense but the more he spoke the more i understood what he meant. Im glad i listened all the way through
Tolerance = the acceptance or cover up for the unpleasant and hostile.
That means you must sacrifice and compromise with your and others self respect and self worth in order to deal with the hostility. To tolerate is to sacrafice what you stand for, what you are okay with, what is right and wrong, and to embrace and accept the disharmony over harmony. To deal with the idea that this is the only way it can be, all other possibilities being closed.
The alternative is everyone going out killing each other like the old days, i don't know how It's not embracing harmony.
@@lau9076 Tolerance is what creates murdurers not people who seek progress. Progress is the only alternative, the other alternative is to tolerate until the fire can no longer be under control, and then all the chaos unleashes.
Yes, but when people aren't being openly hostile it allows room for growth and change. For new ideas to take hold in the next generation. Tolerance is an unfortunate first step towards acceptance, though a society shouldn't stagnate there but rather keep moving forward.
Only person worth listening without pause.
...and at 1:75x speed. You can get to more videos of him this way
So true! He is one of a kind.
...It is better to have tolerance than to engage in hostility. That is the point of "tolerance"
Tolerance already assumes hostility in the first place. That you already accept someone for being different even if that fundamentally might affect him or yourself even. The world is not a beautiful place, its not a perfect place. Not everyone does healthy things for himself and others.
@@warpdrive116 I think you and Osho need to go to a few English classes again.
Tolerance doesn't assume any kind of hostility, only a difference in beliefs.
You can first tolerate others and then learn to understand each other and accept or even evolve together.
The blind pacifism this guy is preaching is helping nobody and is just irrational and antisocial.
Without different ideas and competition between them there is literally zero cultural evolution.
@@Lancor84 Yes acceptance is different from tolerance, dummy. Accepting someone is accepting him for who he is. Tolerance is not about acceptance, its about tolerating someone in many ways which entail conflict.
We are reaching levels of *BASED* not thought to be possible!
Beautiful!!! Tolerance and Intolerance are two sides of the same coin. They are two extremes of the duality of mind. Acceptance is a state beyond both. Acceptance is a state of non-duality. To live in acceptance is to live in awareness. Acceptance is Enlightenment; Acceptance is Nirvana.
I accept that people are evil and I don't tolerate it.
Im still wraping my mind around that
not everyone's evil. so you can drop your tolerate .
I am Evil Black Death, I don't wish to be tolerated.
The profound thing is that the interviewer thought tolerance defuses hostility, but in fact that has the opposite effect in the long-term when hostility may build up more and more until violence becomes the only possible way to release all that tension.
This man is an absolute genius. He just cuts through the heapsof western bullshit with very simple statements. Love it.
I like what he's saying. I will tolerate his irritating way of talking though and might listen some more, probably to the point where my tolerance runs out.
Osho, Krishnamurti and present day Sadghuru. How blessed can one be to live in times with such people. Their teachings are the way for us, if humanity is to evolve beyond their current comfort of todays decisions and echonomical way of life, a look "inward" is necessary, and these teachers are a GREAT guideline to achieve such. - You are all wonderful, Namaste!
Sadhguru doesn't come close
Osho shared a lot of wisdom here, the interviewer was not listening truly
It's about understanding the cost of freedom. It means others must be free as ourselves, or fight over a single way of life only, which will never suit everyone. It's too easy to judge what we don't understand.
What a brilliant brilliant brilliant man !!!!!
Please don't judge him if you haven't listened to him
Hey, from my experience, I agree with him, I never liked tolerance even when I was a kid and now mid--aged ! I always felt that it fuels a forced "agreement" between people, all while boiling up tensions and hatred.
A friend group once told me that I couldn't hang out with them because one of our 'friends' was there. Apparently, he only 'tolerated' my presence and he didn't feel like 'tolerating' me that day. I've never felt more insulted and excluded in my life than when someone said they only 'tolerated' me.
No, 'tolerance' is not a good thing.
He distorted the practical sense of tolerance which include in it love, peace and determination to avoid conflicting feelings, interests, religions and ideologies, it takes us to a higher self were we hold great deal of positivity and self respect which leads to seeing the best of others and empowers people to be more accepting and more forgiving.
This video speaks to me on so many levels... I'm glad my recommendations showed me this man
Care absolutely or absolutely don't care.
A nice way to put it
Tolerance is a necessary cultural step for progress. It doesn't matter if the underlying feeling is hostility - tolerance is better than intolerance.
Osho was badass. Too blunt for this fake world.
Democrats need to watch this video.
This dude is a real gangster ❤
I doubt he went around shooting people
@@snicklesnockle7263
No, he just tried to poison an entire town and started a cult that tried to take over a town in Oregon...with poison.
So you're right but I'd absolutely call it "gangster" to try to poison entire towns (twice) and start a weirdo sex-cult that ruined thousands of lives.
I haven't ever heard this guy talk (except the funny bit that went viral). I was expecting crazy rambling. But... "To tolerate means you have already humiliated the other person." You have my full attention.
One can understand the real meaning of tolerance from this clip. Very true ....
Bless that Moment when you came to my life Osho ,I am always your disciple. You are the Miracle
What was that moment?
Fuck that. NEVER be anyones disciple. You think Osho was a disciple? Hell no. Just listen to this for entertainment. No one or thing is above you (or beneath you for that matter).
Precious, precious, precious words...
With an increasing practical value too...
Intruder alert 🚨 intruder alert
I learn so much fr this master it is wondrous.thank you osho.
Great food for thought. I think I tolerate a lot more than what my circle of friends do and I think that is a good thing, but then I also make the least effort to engage with other people too. I'll have to think on this.