They always make Lennon with almost black hair, he was the blonde Beatle, obviously he wasn't light blonde, but he had dark and reddish blonde hair, copper color.
John has Brown Hair , Brown Light color like for example Harrison Ford or Kevin Costner. Not Blond Blond Hair was Brian Jones , David Bowie , Keith Relft , Sting 👍
They could at the very least have given him height increasing insoles inside his shoes.. Why haven't they thought of that?!🙄 Those are relatively cheap.
People constantly wonder why is so hard to make a movie about the Beatles and why most of the ones that are made don't have a lot of the boys. Well, when you read some comments it's clear why. People will neatpick every fucking detail. Yes, the actor who plays John is shorter, but DAMN the kid nailed the voice and everything else. I think we all know by know that movies and actors are not the real people and events will be changed for the benefit of the narrative. So, CHILL OUT! Why everyone bought Rami Malek and his tiny body frame but a pocket-size John is a big deal? I actually loved it, like a dream come true, tbf. I really liked this movie, reminded me of "A Hard Day's Night" and "Help!" . I loved seing the boys just being boys, honestly! Not to mention Brian finally has more recognition in their story, his struggles and genious do deserve more light. I think things got a little bit rushed by the end, but overall, I know I'll watch it again many times. Edit: Great job with the video, btw!
I understand that it is difficult to find actors who are truly similar and who also know how to play and therefore mimic the movements of the musicians.I know that the important thing is the narrative, but every time there are notable discrepancies: here John is shorter than Ringo. The hairstyles (wigs) are very approximate; probably the general public does not notice it, but the fans do notice all these details and turn up their noses.
While the actor does his character well in my opinion, for me, he looks like a kid amongst the other, which takes a bit away from the experience. I have seen the film, and read critics about it beforehand, so my expectations were not too high. I believe it tries to much and uses a certain way of telling the story (throws in some high level facts in certain places to set up the context). Of course it focuses on Brian, maybe I know the story too well, so it left me quite disengaged. My etalon in terms of biopics is still Backbeat (1994). Still I'll be interested to see the films about the Beatles themselves.
despite the little "historical inconsistencies"...its a brilliant film...and just remember, its NOT about The Beatles, its about Brian Epstein.....its a really really good little movie...enjoy !
Ah, I missed this channel! I thought you were gone for good until this video popped up in my recommendations yesterday. Then I see that you've had a couple of new videos and I need to catch up. Welcome back!
perfect! i find the jesus christ damage control interview so amusing. no celebrity is free from cancellation and the beatles proved that even all those years ago hahahah. i loved how well the actors portrayed the fab four esp in that interview. awesome video, added to my beatle master playlist
They were so cancelled that they were only able to sell out their entire 1966 tour, represent England in Our World in 1967, change rock music with Sgt Pepper... They totally weren't cancelled
@@anyoutubeaccount Oh yeah they sold like 100 less seats or something. He still wasn't cancelled. There were a few irate bible nuts that didn't represent the world as a whole
I haven’t seen it yet but I can’t wait! I’m waiting for the movie to be released in the US! The only thing is I would’ve loved to seen the actors perform Twist and Shout instead of Money. I don’t know why the director decided to do that.
Beatle fans can be so critical, I actually enjoyed these performances, in my opinion this is the best cast I have seen for the Beatles on screen, they actually look a lot like them, especially the one playing Paul. I agree that the actor playing John is bit too short but other than that he actually looks the part. I can already see Beatle fans are gonna be angry when the sam Mendes Beatles biopics are released in a couple of years and are gonna nit pick every detail lol, because you guys are never happy.
Our World broadcast took place on June 25, 1967. Where the hell did you get the August 11, 1966 date from??? Only the most documented group in history, too!
@@markzappasodi Oh no, I must've forgotten to update the date from the last Beatles interview. Sorry about that, and thanks for pointing it out! I'm a bit rusty making these types of videos.
Maybe they couldn't handle the song itself? John Lennon himself said that the song screwed up his throat, perhaps the actors couldn't sing it properly.
Note that it is a copyright issue. There are no songs by Lennon and McCartney in the film, although Twist and Shout is not a song by the duo, but it is clear that the fact of marking Money instead of Twist and Shout was a copyright issue. I believe they gave preference to music that fell under the public domain law.
When The Beatles are playing for the Queen and John say "for the last number I like to..." the correct song that he introduce is "Twist and shout" no "Money". One more time changing The History!
@@nocopienminombre this the rights for the beatles songs aren't cheap even the beatles rock band had to change the setlist from the real ones due to this problem
I just wish I could finally watch this movie somewhere. It is NOT on Prime Video Germany and I don't know how to get hold of it. There are no DVDs, it is not in movie theatres here. Sometimes Germany strikes me as deeply provincial.😢
Because that is what acting is. You expect John and George to rise from the dead and for Paul and ringo to reverse age 60 years just to add some realism?
Great editing! I think it's unforgivable that the actor they chose to portray Lennon looked like Howard Wolowitz and that his closeness with Brian (and I'm not exclusively referring to that blurry episode in Spain) wasn't explored. That "Lennon" even was childish and had a lack of leadership and bravado of the early days. There's a film, "The Birth of the Beatles" that you can find in UA-cam which shows a more believable and truthful approach of this, even though that film encompasses a different historical period (late 50s to 1962). I know "Midas Man" is not a film about The Beatles, but the band is inherently part of Brian's personal history! Brian made them worldwide famous, and by 1966 he was terrified they wouldn't need him any longer (The film should've explore this a bit more). The actor who portrayed Brian did a great job (his manierisms!), although I originally expected someone who resembles Brian a bit more. Other notable casting: George Martin and Paul.
@@dimitreze Yeah, have you ever heard of Patreon though? It’s a special website that some parody video channels on UA-cam use for certain videos that they can’t show on UA-cam. Just an idea.
I don't care about shortness or any other physical thing that much as much as the performance itself, the Lennon actor IS miles away from portraying a vulnerable but confident Lennon, he was insecure but had a strong aura around him at that time, you can see his arrogance through his movements, he knew he was a genius but at the same time he felt small and comfused.
not bad, interesting, but i never cared for re-enactments when the REAL footage exists, be it beatles, m l king, malcolm, whatever...the time of the beatles was almost sacred to me, i feel lucky to have lived seeing a band change & grow without regard to career concerns. and they handled THAT amazingly well. every album was something NEW. it, like anything in life, cant be re-lived...
awful wigs again in a Beatles film there's a band in th uk called the Bootleg Beatles and whoever makes their wigs has them spot on, why can't film makers get that bit right
People have no idea how hard it is to find actors who look enough like them and can move similarly. Be able to play or at least pretend convincingly, and be able to sing if they don't hire soundalikes to cover. You just think there's multiple John lookalikes sitting around, young enough, tall enough and have the talent to pull it off, sitting around to pick from? And that goes for the rest of the band too. Everyone's such a critic. That guy looks like John quite a bit. None of the Beatles had cookie cutter appearances. Very hard to pull off
yup. and a small budget. and the movie is not about them. also the other scenes are also good. they capture the essence. way better than other Beatles biopics
I don't think it looks that bad but I think the sometime the wigs look a bit odd but I think Paul in this is perfect and the rest looks like the Beatles a bit but another thing that is a bit annoying is there guitars aren't strapped high enough mainly John
Tiene una fotografia muy oscura, no se si este era el fin del director, pero le saca toda la frescura de las imagenes originales como asi tambien de la esencia original de los beatles que siempre fue mas bien luminosa y brillante y lo mete dentro de un ambito oscuro, inclusive cambia ropa de ellos que los hacia verse mas "inocentes"y los mete en ropa de cuero que no usaban en la epoca de The Cavern, tambien los shows eran super luminosos y solo se puede apreciar en las escenas un par afocos como si fuera una presentacion oscura y tenebrosa.
And Paul doesn't hold his Bass neck out like, as the NYT said in '64, ". a quartet of mop‐haired Beat singers who hold their guitars like watering cans,"
First all, the boys didn't wear leather for the performance, and why does the drummer look like Pete and not Ringo if they are comparing the same performance?
There isn't any good footage of them in leather from then. This is the _same song_ played only months apart. It's not the wrong comparison, it's the best comparison that exists.
@@beatlemaniacwaltdisneyfan4753 I think it’s because of the moment in the film when Brian is expanding the Beatles' business, and the song Money fits better.
I hope someone’s out there doing what you’re doing or used to do. Maybe even someone you inspired. Because I’ve had several ideas: Monstober Spooktacular crossover Once Upon a Time Steven Universe Tales of Arcadia Dollhouse: The Spy in the House of Love
the actor who act as Paul was over acting.. and the song john sang after his remark "you just rattle your jewelry thing" was twist and shout, not money.. well, this is just a teaser tho, i have to watch it first.. but actors for Paul are usually over acting from most of the movies i saw..
@@jozhharper5824 Perdón por no tener disponibles todas las grabaciones de todas las presentaciones de los Beatles en el Cavern Club en esa época. Claro, debería haber conseguido de alguna forma esa grabación exactamente del día en que Brian Epstein los vio. La próxima vez, viajaré en el tiempo, grabaré el momento y haré un video para que quedes satisfecho.
@@dimitreze a ver primero que nada, TU IRONÍA ES DE NIÑO, segundo, NO critiqué tu vídeo como tal, es más, el problema es la referencia de la película misma NO de tu vídeo. ahora si tu hiciste la referencia con videos distintos, allá tú. Ya que en otra parte de la película John habla de que el resto haga sonar las joyas y sobre la misma dice la siguiente canción se llama MONEY y realmente era Twist and shout (eso es error garrafal de la PELI). Aprende a tener comprensión lectora. no iba a generar un comentario así, pero te lo tomaste personal. y empezaste a ser PAYASO. Saludos P.D.: espero que respondas, es lo más probable.-
@scuffedcovers they doesn't need to look exactly like the beatles. White young guys in their 20s, make the hair and color match, and the most important part, make them actually act like them. They always get John wrong.
I can’t believe they went to all the trouble of re-creating the cavern club in the first scene only to have them wearing leather in the movie, while they wore shirts and ties in real life.
In the movie's timeline, it's accurate that they were wearing leather, as they only started using suits and ties after meeting Brian. This is exactly what the movie portrays.
They just won't let go of dead rock stars, and all the movies are terrible. Like a 5'5 "Freddy Mercury" with fake buck teeth or JL with jet black hair. This will end with a documentary of John Lennon's anus, they'll get an anus that's "Not John Lennon's anus, but an incredible simulation." Just listen to the music, folks. FABS4EVER❤
correction: the date of Our World is 25 june 1967, sorry about the mistake
I will still sub to you in this account no matter what.
You deserved better than this.
@@MasterBotttle thank you
Have you thought about emailing them about it? You could still get it undemonitized.
What a pity....😢😮
That's what makes that date *Global Beatles Day* .
They always make Lennon with almost black hair, he was the blonde Beatle, obviously he wasn't light blonde, but he had dark and reddish blonde hair, copper color.
I'm 68 and had a very similar color back in the day. Dad was a red head.
Yeah Paul was the one with almost black hair
Also their Lennon looks half a foot smaller.
Sometimes he had black hair and sometimes he was a walrus. Do walruses have black hair? Its only a northern song.
Yep!
The hair color they gave Harrison had to be John Lennon's.
I really liked the group interview, Paul especially got the cadence down
Had no idea this movie existed. Thanks for making this. Will definitely be looking for it now.
it's a good movie! it lacks a bigger budget but it tells the story well of Brian
It just came out this year.
Its a decent movie, just don't go in expecting a huge Beatles presence (or even good Beatles actors) it's the Brian show through and through
John has Brown Hair , Brown Light color like for example Harrison Ford or Kevin Costner. Not Blond
Blond Hair was Brian Jones , David Bowie , Keith Relft , Sting 👍
😂😂😂😂 tiny Lennon (the budget was so small they got a 30% discount on the actor 😂😂😂)
I couldn't watch i on that basis......also....in the bits I saw John came over like Ringo's daft cousin...;
They could at the very least have given him height increasing insoles inside his shoes.. Why haven't they thought of that?!🙄 Those are relatively cheap.
As a huge Beatles fan you have just made me aware of this movie so thanks.
People constantly wonder why is so hard to make a movie about the Beatles and why most of the ones that are made don't have a lot of the boys. Well, when you read some comments it's clear why. People will neatpick every fucking detail. Yes, the actor who plays John is shorter, but DAMN the kid nailed the voice and everything else. I think we all know by know that movies and actors are not the real people and events will be changed for the benefit of the narrative. So, CHILL OUT! Why everyone bought Rami Malek and his tiny body frame but a pocket-size John is a big deal? I actually loved it, like a dream come true, tbf. I really liked this movie, reminded me of "A Hard Day's Night" and "Help!" . I loved seing the boys just being boys, honestly! Not to mention Brian finally has more recognition in their story, his struggles and genious do deserve more light. I think things got a little bit rushed by the end, but overall, I know I'll watch it again many times. Edit: Great job with the video, btw!
@@ajulianamorena thanks!
Exactly! Some Beatles fans are just way too critical! I think they looked great, I’d love to watch the full movie!
Yoko is one of the reasons
I totally agree with you, but "pocket-size John" killed me 😂
I understand that it is difficult to find actors who are truly similar and who also know how to play and therefore mimic the movements of the musicians.I know that the important thing is the narrative, but every time there are notable discrepancies: here John is shorter than Ringo. The hairstyles (wigs) are very approximate; probably the general public does not notice it, but the fans do notice all these details and turn up their noses.
@@nonnel64 John been the shortest was the worst thing for me
While the actor does his character well in my opinion, for me, he looks like a kid amongst the other, which takes a bit away from the experience. I have seen the film, and read critics about it beforehand, so my expectations were not too high. I believe it tries to much and uses a certain way of telling the story (throws in some high level facts in certain places to set up the context). Of course it focuses on Brian, maybe I know the story too well, so it left me quite disengaged. My etalon in terms of biopics is still Backbeat (1994). Still I'll be interested to see the films about the Beatles themselves.
The films about sausage, and the beatles take a back seat.
despite the little "historical inconsistencies"...its a brilliant film...and just remember, its NOT about The Beatles, its about Brian Epstein.....its a really really good little movie...enjoy !
Ah, I missed this channel! I thought you were gone for good until this video popped up in my recommendations yesterday. Then I see that you've had a couple of new videos and I need to catch up. Welcome back!
thank youuuu
This is way better than what Doctor Who did for the Beatles. I really like this.
In fairness, discovering that the Beatles are great, is like discovering the chocolate is delicious. One does not need to be a genius.
glad to have you back :)
@@El_Huas0_Gamer thaaanks
I still miss Johnny boy 😔
perfect! i find the jesus christ damage control interview so amusing. no celebrity is free from cancellation and the beatles proved that even all those years ago hahahah. i loved how well the actors portrayed the fab four esp in that interview. awesome video, added to my beatle master playlist
@@japanken8202 thanks!
They were so cancelled that they were only able to sell out their entire 1966 tour, represent England in Our World in 1967, change rock music with Sgt Pepper... They totally weren't cancelled
@@scarpergirl they didn't sell out their 1966 tour. just look at the shea stadium crowd when they played there a second time.
@@anyoutubeaccount Oh yeah they sold like 100 less seats or something. He still wasn't cancelled. There were a few irate bible nuts that didn't represent the world as a whole
@@scarpergirl no he wasn't cancelled, but claiming they sold out their ENTIRE 1966 tour is doofy at best lmao. could you be any more wrong?
I haven’t seen it yet but I can’t wait! I’m waiting for the movie to be released in the US! The only thing is I would’ve loved to seen the actors perform Twist and Shout instead of Money. I don’t know why the director decided to do that.
Hey…at least they got the instruments right!
Cool to have you back on UA-cam! :)
@@TheDRMISTERY thanks!
Beatle fans can be so critical, I actually enjoyed these performances, in my opinion this is the best cast I have seen for the Beatles on screen, they actually look a lot like them, especially the one playing Paul. I agree that the actor playing John is bit too short but other than that he actually looks the part. I can already see Beatle fans are gonna be angry when the sam Mendes Beatles biopics are released in a couple of years and are gonna nit pick every detail lol, because you guys are never happy.
@@illmatic9096 it's a thankless job
the Sam Mendes biopic is already bad in their eyes
Just watched this movie today, it was good!
Our World broadcast took place on June 25, 1967. Where the hell did you get the August 11, 1966 date from??? Only the most documented group in history, too!
I came to write that 😊
Also came to write that date is certainly wrong.
@@markzappasodi Oh no, I must've forgotten to update the date from the last Beatles interview. Sorry about that, and thanks for pointing it out! I'm a bit rusty making these types of videos.
They did a good job on the voice
Why does John have dark hair? He’s also too slight to be John…nice to see a Brian story mind you 🤷🏻
idc about the cast or anything if its a beatles movie i love them all
huh.. playing money instead of Twist and Shout.. odd choice
I bet they couldn’t afford the rights to the song
Metaphor for Brian. Beatles wanted to make people feel good, he wanted money
Maybe they couldn't handle the song itself? John Lennon himself said that the song screwed up his throat, perhaps the actors couldn't sing it properly.
Note that it is a copyright issue. There are no songs by Lennon and McCartney in the film, although Twist and Shout is not a song by the duo, but it is clear that the fact of marking Money instead of Twist and Shout was a copyright issue. I believe they gave preference to music that fell under the public domain law.
@@junca77 I think it was just to fit the story better since Brian was talking about getting the Beatles to the USA
When The Beatles are playing for the Queen and John say "for the last number I like to..." the correct song that he introduce is "Twist and shout" no "Money".
One more time changing The History!
Licensing for Beatles songs are not cheap.
@@nocopienminombre this
the rights for the beatles songs aren't cheap
even the beatles rock band had to change the setlist from the real ones due to this problem
@@nocopienminombre Twist and Shout was a COVER just as Money was a COVER, so what are you on about???
Así es, y empiezan con el grito
@@nocopienminombre no creo que sea ese el motivo ya que "Twist and shout" tampoco está compuesta por The Beatles.
Glad you back 😊
@@mochf thaaanks
George and Pau;l are great
well the voices sound great
Man, it’s been a long while. Hasn’t it?
oh yeah
5 years
Since what @@dimitreze
@@LeoDreweryMusic since last video
@@dimitreze oh kk
I just wish I could finally watch this movie somewhere. It is NOT on Prime Video Germany and I don't know how to get hold of it. There are no DVDs, it is not in movie theatres here. Sometimes Germany strikes me as deeply provincial.😢
You're back? Awesome
@@Dude-oy9dl yup
And when the world needed them most, they returned
Looks like four guys imitating The Beatles
Because that is what acting is. You expect John and George to rise from the dead and for Paul and ringo to reverse age 60 years just to add some realism?
@@Mdd099 Why not?
Great editing! I think it's unforgivable that the actor they chose to portray Lennon looked like Howard Wolowitz and that his closeness with Brian (and I'm not exclusively referring to that blurry episode in Spain) wasn't explored. That "Lennon" even was childish and had a lack of leadership and bravado of the early days. There's a film, "The Birth of the Beatles" that you can find in UA-cam which shows a more believable and truthful approach of this, even though that film encompasses a different historical period (late 50s to 1962). I know "Midas Man" is not a film about The Beatles, but the band is inherently part of Brian's personal history! Brian made them worldwide famous, and by 1966 he was terrified they wouldn't need him any longer (The film should've explore this a bit more). The actor who portrayed Brian did a great job (his manierisms!), although I originally expected someone who resembles Brian a bit more. Other notable casting: George Martin and Paul.
😂😂😂😂 tiny Lennon (the budget was so small they got a 30% discount on the actor 😂😂😂)
_Birth Of The Beatles_ was a Dick Clark production and used Pete Best for information. So of course Pete comes off really well in that movie.
I miss your videos… ❤😢😭
thanks
I miss them too
@@dimitreze Yeah, have you ever heard of Patreon though? It’s a special website that some parody video channels on UA-cam use for certain videos that they can’t show on UA-cam. Just an idea.
Aren't they freaking playing "Twist And Shout 🎸" for "Money (That's What Ï Want) 💷"
I think the songs aren't licensed
like, it's not an official film
Cant wait to see this!
omg YOU'RE BACK
I don't care about shortness or any other physical thing that much as much as the performance itself, the Lennon actor IS miles away from portraying a vulnerable but confident Lennon, he was insecure but had a strong aura around him at that time, you can see his arrogance through his movements, he knew he was a genius but at the same time he felt small and comfused.
not bad, interesting, but i never cared for re-enactments when the REAL footage exists, be it beatles, m l king, malcolm, whatever...the time of the beatles was almost sacred to me, i feel lucky to have lived seeing a band change & grow without regard to career concerns. and they handled THAT amazingly well. every album was something NEW. it, like anything in life, cant be re-lived...
You're very blessed to have witnessed the evolution of The Beatles and the world with it
Siete años exactos entre la grabación de Some other guy y su última sesión fotográfica...
Great film 7/10 great actors too, they could do another Beatles movie with them, a very fun movie would highly recommend
The Lennon characters vocals were weak. It sounded like an adolescent singing.
Strange look John the shortest in movie, real life John should be a quarter inch taller than George, Ringo should be shortest
HE'S BACKKKKKKKKK
You are back!!!
only for now, enjoy it!
How come I can’t find the movie on Prime Video?
Is there a scene in Midas Man where John Lennon gets hit by a shrink ray or something?
Is there a scene in Midas Man where John Lennon has sex with Midas?
Looks good.
awful wigs again in a Beatles film there's a band in th uk called the Bootleg Beatles and whoever makes their wigs has them spot on, why can't film makers get that bit right
Its their real hair dumass
The official narrative rides again.
As opposed to?
this movie wasn't made by Apple or the remaining videos
People have no idea how hard it is to find actors who look enough like them and can move similarly. Be able to play or at least pretend convincingly, and be able to sing if they don't hire soundalikes to cover. You just think there's multiple John lookalikes sitting around, young enough, tall enough and have the talent to pull it off, sitting around to pick from? And that goes for the rest of the band too. Everyone's such a critic. That guy looks like John quite a bit. None of the Beatles had cookie cutter appearances. Very hard to pull off
yup. and a small budget. and the movie is not about them. also the other scenes are also good. they capture the essence. way better than other Beatles biopics
I don't think it looks that bad but I think the sometime the wigs look a bit odd but I think Paul in this is perfect and the rest looks like the Beatles a bit but another thing that is a bit annoying is there guitars aren't strapped high enough mainly John
Where did you get the "Thank our lucky stars" "money thats what i want" clip?
Tiene una fotografia muy oscura, no se si este era el fin del director, pero le saca toda la frescura de las imagenes originales como asi tambien de la esencia original de los beatles que siempre fue mas bien luminosa y brillante y lo mete dentro de un ambito oscuro, inclusive cambia ropa de ellos que los hacia verse mas "inocentes"y los mete en ropa de cuero que no usaban en la epoca de The Cavern, tambien los shows eran super luminosos y solo se puede apreciar en las escenas un par afocos como si fuera una presentacion oscura y tenebrosa.
And Paul doesn't hold his Bass neck out like, as the NYT said in '64, ". a quartet of mop‐haired Beat singers who hold their guitars like watering cans,"
Javier Parisi would have done a better John.
Does anyone know what platform is this movie available on? Tried searching it on Prime Video yesterday and it didn't show up
donde puedo verla? en Latinoamérica
DAMN. I was hoping someone would do a comparison for this movie!! It looks amazing!!👀😁
Ha vueltooo
sí!
I thought your channel isn't monetized anymore why did you return
it got monetized again right after this video ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
welcome back mate! how's life holding up for you?
Back just for this!
My life is really nice indeed!
How’ve you been?
The Beatles
Thoroughly enjoyed the film. (Movie in America). Except for the actor who played John. Did a great job of it. But, he was too short!
John was only 5'9-10 in real life
hay fallos, cuando john dice hagan sonar sus joyas, la canción que presenta a continuación debe se twist and shout y no money
People keep focusing on the height. I thought he did amazingly and looks the part
@@benzo546 yeah, all four actors are alright
Yeah I mentioned the height but facially he's a close enough match.
John Lennon looks like a dwarf
First all, the boys didn't wear leather for the performance, and why does the drummer look like Pete and not Ringo if they are comparing the same performance?
@@capitolemiproducer they did wear when Brian first saw them
the suits came later
The Beatles in this film is not the main focus it’s on Mr. Epstein.
The guy playing Lennon is way too short. He’s shorter than Ringo in the movie.
Are we back?
@@vcc947 just for now
Lennon was so badly miscast in this its actually a joke
WHAAAAT the next song MONEY????.---
In the Cavern scene: They didn't use vest till Epstein was their manager. You're making a wrong period comparison.
There isn't any good footage of them in leather from then. This is the _same song_ played only months apart. It's not the wrong comparison, it's the best comparison that exists.
John Lennon was more than 4 ft 6 inches tall……..
why money instead of twist and shout wtf
@@beatlemaniacwaltdisneyfan4753 I think it’s because of the moment in the film when Brian is expanding the Beatles' business, and the song Money fits better.
@@dimitreze ok lol
I hope someone’s out there doing what you’re doing or used to do. Maybe even someone you inspired. Because I’ve had several ideas: Monstober Spooktacular crossover
Once Upon a Time
Steven Universe
Tales of Arcadia
Dollhouse: The Spy in the House of Love
@@AJ-xc4qe I've seen others channels like mine. Maybe they can do your suggestions.
Could you name them? Because when I search “scene comparison”, I either get you or hatebait rants. Maybe there’s another term for it.
@@AJ-xc4qe I don't remember. But I saw it here and there.
the actor who act as Paul was over acting.. and the song john sang after his remark "you just rattle your jewelry thing" was twist and shout, not money.. well, this is just a teaser tho, i have to watch it first.. but actors for Paul are usually over acting from most of the movies i saw..
The guy playing Lennon looks like a boyish Elon Musk. LMAO!
George Harrison actor looks like Mick Jagger 😂
no es la misma escena, pues Brian los conoció con ropa de cuero y el vídeo original ya están vestidos formales... algo que el mismo Brian les impuso
@@jozhharper5824 Perdón por no tener disponibles todas las grabaciones de todas las presentaciones de los Beatles en el Cavern Club en esa época. Claro, debería haber conseguido de alguna forma esa grabación exactamente del día en que Brian Epstein los vio. La próxima vez, viajaré en el tiempo, grabaré el momento y haré un video para que quedes satisfecho.
@@dimitreze a ver primero que nada, TU IRONÍA ES DE NIÑO, segundo, NO critiqué tu vídeo como tal, es más, el problema es la referencia de la película misma NO de tu vídeo.
ahora si tu hiciste la referencia con videos distintos, allá tú.
Ya que en otra parte de la película John habla de que el resto haga sonar las joyas y sobre la misma dice la siguiente canción se llama MONEY y realmente era Twist and shout (eso es error garrafal de la PELI). Aprende a tener comprensión lectora.
no iba a generar un comentario así, pero te lo tomaste personal. y empezaste a ser PAYASO. Saludos
P.D.: espero que respondas, es lo más probable.-
The worst part about beatles movies is, they get the weirdest actors.
George looks like Byrds drummer Mik Clark
you know how hard it is to find someone who looks exactly like the Beatles?
@scuffedcovers they doesn't need to look exactly like the beatles. White young guys in their 20s, make the hair and color match, and the most important part, make them actually act like them. They always get John wrong.
@@OutFreak28 i get what you mean, but at the same time, it doesn't matter that much
@@OutFreak28 I think you’re not appreciating how difficult it would be to even get as close as they got
Colocaram um John Lenon anão
The film was good they did a good job but they looked nothing like the beatles and the guy being john lennon was the worst and looked about 5ft1lol
Make a patreon!
Pero ahi hay muchos errores
They should have used people from the Fab 4 and the Bootleg Beatles. They look more like the Beatles than these people.
Parecen mas los rolling stones que los beatles 😊
Looks more like Howard from the Big Bang theory.
Can you do a scene comparison of Kingdom Of The Planet Of The Apes? Please? 😢🥺🙏💖💖💖💖💖💖❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@@AlejandroGarza2005 I won't (check the pinned comment) but what other movie I would compare Kingdon to?
@dimitreze How about a scene comparison of Smallville?
Wow, I actually had very low expectations for this movie. Seemed like it was never going to come out to the public.
I can’t believe they went to all the trouble of re-creating the cavern club in the first scene only to have them wearing leather in the movie, while they wore shirts and ties in real life.
In the movie's timeline, it's accurate that they were wearing leather, as they only started using suits and ties after meeting Brian. This is exactly what the movie portrays.
Very good film but im not sure who cast john lennon as a dwarf?
Why didn't they use the audio from the Cavern film?
@@songlove7777 because it would be very expensive. it's way cheaper to take the song and make a new version
If we have the lads on film doing all this stuff why is this a film that looks awful anyway , MONEY ...ooh yeah yeah yeah
They just won't let go of dead rock stars, and all the movies are terrible. Like a 5'5 "Freddy Mercury" with fake buck teeth or JL with jet black hair.
This will end with a documentary of John Lennon's anus, they'll get an anus that's "Not John Lennon's anus, but an incredible simulation." Just listen to the music, folks. FABS4EVER❤
Midas Man's Beatles looks like Madame Tussauds wax statues ...horrid. A Beatles film without beatles music... No enough money Amazon?