China has J-35A Jet fighter. The Chinese J-35A is not a copy of F-35 but made for beats F-35. It flying faster, M2.2 vs M1.6,with longer range, better radar and better missiles. China has better wind tunnel. F-35 look like a BBW and J-35A look like a beauty 😍 As a result it is faster. Please read the news Zhuhai Airshow.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! It’s interesting to see different perspectives on advanced fighter jets and how various nations approach design and technology. The Zhuhai Airshow definitely highlights some impressive developments. Every aircraft is built with different objectives in mind, which makes comparing them quite complex. Appreciate the insights!
Thanks for sharing your perspective! These aircraft definitely spark debate, and it’s interesting to see how they continue to evolve. Appreciate you watching!
@@ProcessPath I worked in the industry and have experience in American and Chinese aircraft factories. Two weeks ago, I chatted with some kids who were participating in the Chinese College Student Entrepreneurship Plan Competition at Xi'an Jiaotong University. When I pointed out that I had been in the aircraft business, a few commented that the future was in robotics, where autonomous drone systems would dominate future conflicts. One of the kids had a few ideas about programming dedicated hunter drones to seek and attack systems that were only operated by enemy countries. He was considering building drones that could identify and target F-35s, which are only flown by American allied countries. His critique was focused on the problems with the F-35 and F-22 programs. They cost too much and consume too many resources to keep them occupied. He noted that the AGO had reported that F-35s were combat-ready less than 35% of the time. Worse, he said that as much as 20% of the time, the aircraft could not be flight-ready in less than three hours. That means that if an enemy fired rockets and cruise missiles at airfields housing such aircraft, as much as 20% of the aircraft could be destroyed because they could not be flown away from the target zone. That seemed like a good point.
China has J-35A Jet fighter. The Chinese J-35A is not a copy of F-35 but made for beats F-35. It flying faster, M2.2 vs M1.6,with longer range, better radar and better missiles. China has better wind tunnel. F-35 look like a BBW and J-35A look like a beauty 😍 As a result it is faster. Please read the news Zhuhai Airshow.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! It’s interesting to see different perspectives on advanced fighter jets and how various nations approach design and technology. The Zhuhai Airshow definitely highlights some impressive developments. Every aircraft is built with different objectives in mind, which makes comparing them quite complex. Appreciate the insights!
@ProcessPath thanks
J-35A is a fake.
The aircraft is a failure. Too expensive and unreliable.
Thanks for sharing your perspective! These aircraft definitely spark debate, and it’s interesting to see how they continue to evolve. Appreciate you watching!
@@ProcessPath I worked in the industry and have experience in American and Chinese aircraft factories. Two weeks ago, I chatted with some kids who were participating in the Chinese College Student Entrepreneurship Plan Competition at Xi'an Jiaotong University. When I pointed out that I had been in the aircraft business, a few commented that the future was in robotics, where autonomous drone systems would dominate future conflicts. One of the kids had a few ideas about programming dedicated hunter drones to seek and attack systems that were only operated by enemy countries. He was considering building drones that could identify and target F-35s, which are only flown by American allied countries.
His critique was focused on the problems with the F-35 and F-22 programs. They cost too much and consume too many resources to keep them occupied. He noted that the AGO had reported that F-35s were combat-ready less than 35% of the time. Worse, he said that as much as 20% of the time, the aircraft could not be flight-ready in less than three hours. That means that if an enemy fired rockets and cruise missiles at airfields housing such aircraft, as much as 20% of the aircraft could be destroyed because they could not be flown away from the target zone. That seemed like a good point.