I’ve used proportional stringing for decades. It’s especially great for small-headed players rackets like the head prestige mid. Makes the whole head feel like a sweet spot. I generally start the center mains at a couple pounds higher tension than normal, and I start dropping the tension a pound each as the strings get shorter. This gives extra control in the sweet spot, and helps compensate for a little tension loss caused by outer mains being lower tension. I find there’s generally less need to proportionally string the crosses, although if you have a racket with a dead tip, you could start out stringing at the head a little lower and it will liven it up. Before I tried this, I also believed the string tensions would equalize from play, but experience has shown me otherwise.
Anthony I usually start the center mains at 2-3 lbs higher than normal. Then, after the first 2-3 mains, where you can see the string length shortening on the head, drop the tension one pound each string until you get to the end. So, with a racket that I would normally string at 55 lbs, I’d start at about 57-58, and end up at the edges around 47-50 depending on the racket.
we made an unbiased amateur players review on our channel comparing Sergetti and Conventional method, most people who tested out felt softer feel overall but the conventional method still feels more pop on-center hit compared to sergetti. try out a direct comparison between conventional and sergetti with the same racket and tension, thumbs up on the tension maintenance, thumbs down on the durability.
I've been using the Sergetti method for the past couple of years...I use a Wilson Clash 100 Pro customized to 325g...originally I played tested Volkl V-Square @ 50 lb.with regular stringing and the Sergetti method...After a couple of weeks, I prefered the Sergetti for the same reasons mentioned above; ball pocketing, better feel on any "off center" hits, etc...I've had some customers that like it and some that don't...my .02 is that with better improvements in frame quality and string choice, it makes sense that string tension may be the last frontier...it's definitely worth trying...
I also have a personal technique to apply a unique not replicable tension to every string on the racket since many years ago, it is called "having a shitty manual stringing machine".
I have created my own proportional stringing which is somewhere between normal string and sergetti and i already notice those enhancements. Not as extreme and elaborate as sergetti, but it works for me. It evens out the string bed towards all edges with lower tension with a higher tension in the middle. Bigger sweet spot, better response of the bed, livelier string bed (which includes power and spin), less inconsistency outside the middle of the racket and all that without losing any of the control I have multiple different rackets and like to try rackets and string setups. I cannot afford to have a customized sergetti for each variation. But if you have the same rackets with the same strings i think it is worth it to get a custom sergetti sheet Especially if you like 18x20 dense string patterns like me. 18x20 string patterns tend to have already a smaller sweet spot than 16x19 and more stiff bed because of the density. Especially then it makes a huge difference
I use it on my four Head Gravity MPs. It's opened up my string bed since I started using it back in November. It's a total change from pulling the tension the same every time. My composite tension is 51lbs.
Tried it.. I didnt like the original tension provided it felt too stiff.. For instance I play with 45lbs on my racquet.. Sergetti will require more than 45lbs on some strings...So i changed the tension where the maximum string tension on the racquet will be 45lbs and lowered the rest by the same percentage... Now I like it and works really well.
For a legitimate comparison surely you would have to give Coach Gu and Chien a racquet that's freshly strung using the normal method and then also another one using this method without telling them which racquet is strung with the sergetti method? Also worth asking the question, with this method will it cause damage to the racquet frame (I suspect not) - but after paying Sergetti for the sheet and service is he liable for any damages incurred to the racquet (I suspect not?)
We did exactly the blind test testimonials on different players on our channel awhile back, the results is shocking. ua-cam.com/video/B4gPS-uLqyI/v-deo.html
Hi I love watching your channel here in Australia. I have a question for you about hybrid stringing,. Which combo will generate more spin. Multifilament mains with polyester crosses OR polyester mains with multifilament crosses. Please keep up the good work - cheers Len
Hey I've been stringing my own for the last year and from all the researching I've done and read up on the mains will have the biggest impact on spin and feel. The rough explanation is your racquet is sideways during your main strokes, and in twistier serves the racquet flows sideways to the ball. As such poly will have more grip on any spin attempt in comparison to multi. The multi is only necessary if youre trying to soften up your string bed for feel or comfort. If those arent a concern to you then a full bed of poly would give you the most spin possible depending on your personal racquet head speed. If you want a compromise between the two options you can always look into softer poly string types. Hope that wasnt too much info but I know how complicated this all is and the frustration of piecing it all together
@@camwhitelock Andy Murray strings poly mains & multi crosses. Roger & Novak string gut mains & poly crosses. Have you tried both? Which gives more spin? - cheers Len
@@MrDrLen poly gives the most spin in most cases, but wears out fast so it's not ideal to use for more than a month of regular play. Gut is always gonna be the best feeling string and pocket the best. The pro staff is a very stiff racquet so Federer is probably trying to get the best of both worlds with the frames accuracy and the control from gut. Poly on the crosses would give a side of extra grip but not as much as it could on the mains. Is your main goal simply spin or the best overall combo as that changes based on the frame, tension and players style. Also the best rule of thumb is strings and frame are second to good form. Majority of spin is generated in the vertical shift of the racquet with the strings complimenting or taking away a small amount. Personal feel and comfort is most important so don't be afraid to try it all out if that's a financial option
Hi There! Definitely without a doubt put the poly on the mains if you want more top spin. If you are new to polys I would suggest using LXN Element or Yonex Poly Tour Pro as it will be softer on your arm. We love answering your questions and will always try to respond on our videos! Take a look at our youtube page, we own two tennis stores in northern California not far from Harry
What I would like to know is how the different tensions from string to string do not look to equalize, what keeps that string locked in at that tension?
I can tell you why! Because each length of string has different elongation, for example, if the string has 10% elongation under pressure. The longer section will elongate more absolute value. I bet he has longer sections higher tension.
If you start with the 2 middle mains strings at 55lbs for example and you reduce the tension by 1 lb (eg) each string, what do you think happens to the string you release with the looser tension. I would guess the first string you pulled at 55lbs is no longer 55lbs but closer to the 2nd string tension. what happens when you get to the outside main (if you are doing a hybrid) and your tension is down to 48lbs, if you don't add a tie off tension your outside loose string will be 43lbs when you release it and it will effect the 2nd and 3rd outside main string tensions. The same with the cross strings. Do you really think any touring pro will use this method week in week out, especially if they use onsite stringers. One tension fine, two tensions fine, 35-38 different tensions is a recipe for trouble. Best pattern I used for our touring players 1 piece was a 3x3 box pattern, especially high tension, natural gut 18x20 racquets. As time went on and more hybrids came in, tensions dropped dramatically sometimes to mid 30's. If you are hitting so many shots off center that you need to think about stringing looser on the outer strings then wouldn't you use a different racquet to reflect your playing skill level. Anyway just my 2 cents. Someone correct me if I am on the wrong track. I have seen many patterns come and go and not one is picked up by the players that really need the accurate, reliable patterns on tour.
I had the same logic as you initially before I tried out the sergetti method, But we did a number of blinds tests session video on our channel with different players, and all of them felt the difference. However, each of them has mixed feeling about the method.
@@porto23500 Which Tour player wouldn't want all the benefits that Sergetti claim !!?? It's not aimed at Tour players because it's a waste of their time because they know better. Proportional stringing is nothing new.
i am guessing that softer strings like the synthetic gut or natural gut would normalize at a much faster pace than polyester, but I've tried it out myself on polyester, same racket same equivalent tension
Question(s): 1. Does this method have lots of tie offs? 2. If no multiple tie offs, won't the tension kind of equalise all too quickly, negating the unequal tension? 3. Is the blueprint expensive to purchase?
My feeling is this type of stringing is just all marketing. Stringing each cross and main slightly differently due to length to create an effective tension may sound scientific but unless each main and cross is individually tied off, the fact that the string job is either a one-piece or two-piece will simply lower the overall tension of the string bed. A lower tension will simply give the illusion of more power and a "larger sweet spot." I would try the Sargetti method in one racquet at their reference 50 pounds and another racquet at say 45 pounds and then do a blind test to see if a simply 10% reduction at 50 vs Sargetti 50 are any different.
Dear anacap007, it is not just marketing. I have passed 12 years to develop this Stringing Technology. I see many comments that are unfortunately from feeling, opinion, etc, without really knowing the details of stringing or having testing anything. I think that when someone does not know something or has not tested what he is saying, it would be better to stay neutral instead of being negative about it. There is a lot of work behing this Sergetti Stringing Technology.
@@sergettitennis appreciates the work and research put into this service. we went through a laboruous blind playtests for Sergetti vs Conventional with all else being equal (Racket & string) majority of the players who've tried it did feel the difference, but their preference differ. your claim for the method (larger sweet spot, tension maintanence, soft feel) we can definitely vouch for those from the experience we had with the string. However, 2x durability didn't quite hit the mark, which I was a bit disappointed. overall, it's an interesting way to stringing that I'd recommend people to try it
@@JusTennis Thank you for your comment, I appreciate it... We mentinoed that durability is optimized and could be up to 2.5 times, meaning for us that it could be up to 2.5 times. It optimizes durability for all type of strings but for more sticky strings, it would be just a bit more because it as already close to its max durability potential, and having less string movement with it, there is less friction and a bit increase in durability. For Polys that are more icy, we experimented an increase in durabilty of 2.5 times. What we say is alway based on results we experienced. About blind testing, it is important to make sure the Sergetti Reference Tension is the optimized one for the tester who is using his optimized conventionaly striung racquet. Since Sergetti feel is a lot different, sometimes an adjustment is necessary: a 52 lb coventionaly strung racquet will need a 50 lb Sergeeti one for that player to feel the right power/control balance. Have a great day!
why does it feel like I'm watching an internet infomercial where its blah blah no actual details blah blah then call this number or visit this website? lol smh
He got his stringing tension sheets for free from Sergetti, so he’s not allowed to show them. They’re unique only for the racquet and reference tension, so it can be used by anyone playing the same racquet and tension.
@@andreii.6094 I am member at a Country Club. I've strung 8 rackets with Sergetti Stringing Method. All the 4.5 Usta members tried it it for a week. All said it was junk after 1 day of hard hitting. We used tension gauges and noticed the string tensions that were adjusted was not the same tension after 1 session of hitting. Dude if you want the string specs from Sergetti, I'll send to you to try. I don't think you tried the method or it's in your head or Placebo effect. Btw all the test were blind tested with the members. They didn't know I used Sergetti Stringing Method. I told them after their reviews. They all said Junk.
Unless you have incredibly rough grommets which may break your strings anyway, the uneven tensions will even out within one hour so in conclusion, unless you're willing to change string jobs every hour, this method is useless. There are better, cheaper and easier methods to achieve the same principals. Just do some research.
@@sergettitennis I don't just see it, I've experienced it and used it. And I'm afraid your method only lasts an hour at most. The fact that you need to comment on youtube on this retailer's channel to defend yourself is a reflection of your own doubts !
@@a2casius This is wrong. The Sergetti stringing does not last 1 hour at all. You are talking about your own experience of it and what if you had a too low/borderline Sergetti Reference tension, and after one hour of play, with a normal bit loss of tension, you were out of your comfort tension zone? You probably needed an higher Sergetti reference tension. What is your name? I will look in our sold sheets. You should have write to me to inform about your experience. Are you stringing your racquets? What if the clamp were too loose for higher tension on the sheet. Sometimes there is a need to do slight clamp adjustment throughout the installation. An higher tension elongates more the string making it thinner. An experience srringer will feel it and do the proper adjustment throughout the process. Have a good day!
@@a2casius I just do not appreciate that kind of comment that does not reflect the reality at all of what is the real results and all the work done behind Sergetti Stringing Technology. I asked TennisSpin if it would be possinle to evaluate Sergetti and thay have done a great reliable and independent evaluation that reflected exactly what Sergetti benefits are and I am grateful for that since it is what players and stringers from over 60 countries are experiencing. Have a good day!
@@sergettitennis I have over 30 years of stringing experience and I have two engineering degrees and I have a seniors ITF world ranking. I have much experience of racquet technology, stringing and playing Tennis so I know precisely what I'm talking about and what you're talking about. That of course should not stop or impair you from selling your proportional stringing to less educated and less experienced users. As always, I shall have a great day.
I’ve used proportional stringing for decades. It’s especially great for small-headed players rackets like the head prestige mid. Makes the whole head feel like a sweet spot. I generally start the center mains at a couple pounds higher tension than normal, and I start dropping the tension a pound each as the strings get shorter. This gives extra control in the sweet spot, and helps compensate for a little tension loss caused by outer mains being lower tension.
I find there’s generally less need to proportionally string the crosses, although if you have a racket with a dead tip, you could start out stringing at the head a little lower and it will liven it up.
Before I tried this, I also believed the string tensions would equalize from play, but experience has shown me otherwise.
How much should I start the center at and how much to drop each strong from there?
Anthony I usually start the center mains at 2-3 lbs higher than normal. Then, after the first 2-3 mains, where you can see the string length shortening on the head, drop the tension one pound each string until you get to the end.
So, with a racket that I would normally string at 55 lbs, I’d start at about 57-58, and end up at the edges around 47-50 depending on the racket.
we made an unbiased amateur players review on our channel comparing Sergetti and Conventional method, most people who tested out felt softer feel overall but the conventional method still feels more pop on-center hit compared to sergetti. try out a direct comparison between conventional and sergetti with the same racket and tension, thumbs up on the tension maintenance, thumbs down on the durability.
I've been using the Sergetti method for the past couple of years...I use a Wilson Clash 100 Pro customized to 325g...originally I played tested Volkl V-Square @ 50 lb.with regular stringing and the Sergetti method...After a couple of weeks, I prefered the Sergetti for the same reasons mentioned above; ball pocketing, better feel on any "off center" hits, etc...I've had some customers that like it and some that don't...my .02 is that with better improvements in frame quality and string choice, it makes sense that string tension may be the last frontier...it's definitely worth trying...
I also have a personal technique to apply a unique not replicable tension to every string on the racket since many years ago, it is called "having a shitty manual stringing machine".
Harry, do the review of Ivan Lendl stringing method of gut/poly or multi/poly. Cheers
I have created my own proportional stringing which is somewhere between normal string and sergetti and i already notice those enhancements. Not as extreme and elaborate as sergetti, but it works for me. It evens out the string bed towards all edges with lower tension with a higher tension in the middle.
Bigger sweet spot, better response of the bed, livelier string bed (which includes power and spin), less inconsistency outside the middle of the racket and all that without losing any of the control
I have multiple different rackets and like to try rackets and string setups. I cannot afford to have a customized sergetti for each variation. But if you have the same rackets with the same strings i think it is worth it to get a custom sergetti sheet
Especially if you like 18x20 dense string patterns like me. 18x20 string patterns tend to have already a smaller sweet spot than 16x19 and more stiff bed because of the density. Especially then it makes a huge difference
I use this method on my rackets, works great with stiff poly but i string about 2 pounds tighter than normal to reduce the trampolining of the ball!
I use it on my four Head Gravity MPs. It's opened up my string bed since I started using it back in November. It's a total change from pulling the tension the same every time. My composite tension is 51lbs.
Tried it.. I didnt like the original tension provided it felt too stiff.. For instance I play with 45lbs on my racquet.. Sergetti will require more than 45lbs on some strings...So i changed the tension where the maximum string tension on the racquet will be 45lbs and lowered the rest by the same percentage... Now I like it and works really well.
How does this compare with the jet method or the proportional stringing method?
Thanks again!! Good info!
Snake oil string job
For a legitimate comparison surely you would have to give Coach Gu and Chien a racquet that's freshly strung using the normal method and then also another one using this method without telling them which racquet is strung with the sergetti method?
Also worth asking the question, with this method will it cause damage to the racquet frame (I suspect not) - but after paying Sergetti for the sheet and service is he liable for any damages incurred to the racquet (I suspect not?)
We did exactly the blind test testimonials on different players on our channel awhile back, the results is shocking. ua-cam.com/video/B4gPS-uLqyI/v-deo.html
When you tie off on the ends (mains), aren't you losing tension on the outer strings, anyway?
It is calculated into the sheet...
Hi I love watching your channel here in Australia. I have a question for you about hybrid stringing,. Which combo will generate more spin. Multifilament mains with polyester crosses OR polyester mains with multifilament crosses. Please keep up the good work - cheers Len
Hey I've been stringing my own for the last year and from all the researching I've done and read up on the mains will have the biggest impact on spin and feel. The rough explanation is your racquet is sideways during your main strokes, and in twistier serves the racquet flows sideways to the ball. As such poly will have more grip on any spin attempt in comparison to multi. The multi is only necessary if youre trying to soften up your string bed for feel or comfort. If those arent a concern to you then a full bed of poly would give you the most spin possible depending on your personal racquet head speed. If you want a compromise between the two options you can always look into softer poly string types.
Hope that wasnt too much info but I know how complicated this all is and the frustration of piecing it all together
@@camwhitelock Andy Murray strings poly mains & multi crosses. Roger & Novak string gut mains & poly crosses. Have you tried both? Which gives more spin? - cheers Len
@@MrDrLen poly gives the most spin in most cases, but wears out fast so it's not ideal to use for more than a month of regular play. Gut is always gonna be the best feeling string and pocket the best. The pro staff is a very stiff racquet so Federer is probably trying to get the best of both worlds with the frames accuracy and the control from gut. Poly on the crosses would give a side of extra grip but not as much as it could on the mains.
Is your main goal simply spin or the best overall combo as that changes based on the frame, tension and players style. Also the best rule of thumb is strings and frame are second to good form. Majority of spin is generated in the vertical shift of the racquet with the strings complimenting or taking away a small amount.
Personal feel and comfort is most important so don't be afraid to try it all out if that's a financial option
Hi There! Definitely without a doubt put the poly on the mains if you want more top spin. If you are new to polys I would suggest using LXN Element or Yonex Poly Tour Pro as it will be softer on your arm. We love answering your questions and will always try to respond on our videos! Take a look at our youtube page, we own two tennis stores in northern California not far from Harry
What I would like to know is how the different tensions from string to string do not look to equalize, what keeps that string locked in at that tension?
The grommets have a surprising amount of friction locking the strings in place.
Even with a broken string, the stringbed does not just unravel.
Do a reverse sergetti looser string tension in centre
I can tell you why! Because each length of string has different elongation, for example, if the string has 10% elongation under pressure. The longer section will elongate more absolute value. I bet he has longer sections higher tension.
If you start with the 2 middle mains strings at 55lbs for example and you reduce the tension by 1 lb (eg) each string, what do you think happens to the string you release with the looser tension. I would guess the first string you pulled at 55lbs is no longer 55lbs but closer to the 2nd string tension. what happens when you get to the outside main (if you are doing a hybrid) and your tension is down to 48lbs, if you don't add a tie off tension your outside loose string will be 43lbs when you release it and it will effect the 2nd and 3rd outside main string tensions. The same with the cross strings. Do you really think any touring pro will use this method week in week out, especially if they use onsite stringers. One tension fine, two tensions fine, 35-38 different tensions is a recipe for trouble. Best pattern I used for our touring players 1 piece was a 3x3 box pattern, especially high tension, natural gut 18x20 racquets. As time went on and more hybrids came in, tensions dropped dramatically sometimes to mid 30's. If you are hitting so many shots off center that you need to think about stringing looser on the outer strings then wouldn't you use a different racquet to reflect your playing skill level. Anyway just my 2 cents. Someone correct me if I am on the wrong track. I have seen many patterns come and go and not one is picked up by the players that really need the accurate, reliable patterns on tour.
I had the same logic as you initially before I tried out the sergetti method, But we did a number of blinds tests session video on our channel with different players, and all of them felt the difference. However, each of them has mixed feeling about the method.
Sergetti isn't aimed at tour players!
@@porto23500 Which Tour player wouldn't want all the benefits that Sergetti claim !!?? It's not aimed at Tour players because it's a waste of their time because they know better. Proportional stringing is nothing new.
Great summary. I would also like to see a direct response to your comments from Sergetti side.
@@yimingzhh I doubt he'll get a response after my exchange with Sergetti.
Have you tried the spaghetti stringing method?
NEW Wilson Clash - its time to Test it out.
Do you have a promo code to get a sheet?
Thanks is usefull
Once you start hitting doesnt it all even out? Like the ball smashing on the strings should even out all the tension?
i am guessing that softer strings like the synthetic gut or natural gut would normalize at a much faster pace than polyester, but I've tried it out myself on polyester, same racket same equivalent tension
12*1.7 equals 20.4 percent of the string bed?
Question(s):
1. Does this method have lots of tie offs?
2. If no multiple tie offs, won't the tension kind of equalise all too quickly, negating the unequal tension?
3. Is the blueprint expensive to purchase?
You’d be surprised how well each string holds its own tension, they don’t equalize as much as you’d think.
@@brentpederson4942 Thank you very much for your answer!!! Best regards...
Look at the bed of your racket, it was made to maximize the sweetspot, it doesn't need Sergetti.
Will it charge much more to string it that way?
they need to do a blade pro Light
My feeling is this type of stringing is just all marketing. Stringing each cross and main slightly differently due to length to create an effective tension may sound scientific but unless each main and cross is individually tied off, the fact that the string job is either a one-piece or two-piece will simply lower the overall tension of the string bed. A lower tension will simply give the illusion of more power and a "larger sweet spot." I would try the Sargetti method in one racquet at their reference 50 pounds and another racquet at say 45 pounds and then do a blind test to see if a simply 10% reduction at 50 vs Sargetti 50 are any different.
Lol, we did the blind test on our channel few month ago, many players have mixed feelings
Dear anacap007, it is not just marketing. I have passed 12 years to develop this Stringing Technology. I see many comments that are unfortunately from feeling, opinion, etc, without really knowing the details of stringing or having testing anything. I think that when someone does not know something or has not tested what he is saying, it would be better to stay neutral instead of being negative about it. There is a lot of work behing this Sergetti Stringing Technology.
@@sergettitennis appreciates the work and research put into this service. we went through a laboruous blind playtests for Sergetti vs Conventional with all else being equal (Racket & string) majority of the players who've tried it did feel the difference, but their preference differ. your claim for the method (larger sweet spot, tension maintanence, soft feel) we can definitely vouch for those from the experience we had with the string. However, 2x durability didn't quite hit the mark, which I was a bit disappointed. overall, it's an interesting way to stringing that I'd recommend people to try it
@@JusTennis Thank you for your comment, I appreciate it... We mentinoed that durability is optimized and could be up to 2.5 times, meaning for us that it could be up to 2.5 times. It optimizes durability for all type of strings but for more sticky strings, it would be just a bit more because it as already close to its max durability potential, and having less string movement with it, there is less friction and a bit increase in durability. For Polys that are more icy, we experimented an increase in durabilty of 2.5 times. What we say is alway based on results we experienced. About blind testing, it is important to make sure the Sergetti Reference Tension is the optimized one for the tester who is using his optimized conventionaly striung racquet. Since Sergetti feel is a lot different, sometimes an adjustment is necessary: a 52 lb coventionaly strung racquet will need a 50 lb Sergeeti one for that player to feel the right power/control balance. Have a great day!
@@sergettitennis what do you mean by "optimized" I purchase a tension profile from your website, are those considered optimized?
I have question, when you said i strung my racket 48 pounds, you pulled mains at 48 and crosses 48 or 48/44 or something else :)
Like some string will be 62 others will be 32 every string is a different tension
It’s not the wand, it’s the magician.
What is with all the bandage up fingers?
I’m going to assume high volume stringing
@@MrJonOnTheRoad yes. brutal on the fingers
Especially with edged/shaped polys these days that are harder and stiffer than gut/syngut/multi.
@@jerome_morrow especially Barbwire… I hate those strings and I hate that people like them because I hate stringing with it
Who are the world tennis pros who tried this tensions specially italian pros?
@t web site is not working
sergetti web site is not working
👍
What pros are using this method?
why does it feel like I'm watching an internet infomercial where its blah blah no actual details blah blah then call this number or visit this website? lol smh
He got his stringing tension sheets for free from Sergetti, so he’s not allowed to show them. They’re unique only for the racquet and reference tension, so it can be used by anyone playing the same racquet and tension.
He's a Retailer and his videos are mostly Product Placements. If you treat it as such rather than intellectual analysis, you'll feel a lot better :)
check out our unbiased sergetti review. we talk about the good and the bad ua-cam.com/video/B4gPS-uLqyI/v-deo.html
its what tennisspin has become.
Sergetti Stringing is such BS. Tried it on my RF97 v13. After playing for about 15 mins. I noticed a lot of inconsistencies. Waste of money
@@andreii.6094 I am member at a Country Club. I've strung 8 rackets with Sergetti Stringing Method. All the 4.5 Usta members tried it it for a week. All said it was junk after 1 day of hard hitting. We used tension gauges and noticed the string tensions that were adjusted was not the same tension after 1 session of hitting. Dude if you want the string specs from Sergetti, I'll send to you to try. I don't think you tried the method or it's in your head or Placebo effect. Btw all the test were blind tested with the members. They didn't know I used Sergetti Stringing Method. I told them after their reviews. They all said Junk.
Unless you have incredibly rough grommets which may break your strings anyway, the uneven tensions will even out within one hour so in conclusion, unless you're willing to change string jobs every hour, this method is useless. There are better, cheaper and easier methods to achieve the same principals. Just do some research.
Dear Chairman, your way of seeing how Sergetti and the details of the stringing works does not reflect reality.
@@sergettitennis I don't just see it, I've experienced it and used it. And I'm afraid your method only lasts an hour at most. The fact that you need to comment on youtube on this retailer's channel to defend yourself is a reflection of your own doubts !
@@a2casius This is wrong. The Sergetti stringing does not last 1 hour at all. You are talking about your own experience of it and what if you had a too low/borderline Sergetti Reference tension, and after one hour of play, with a normal bit loss of tension, you were out of your comfort tension zone? You probably needed an higher Sergetti reference tension. What is your name? I will look in our sold sheets. You should have write to me to inform about your experience. Are you stringing your racquets? What if the clamp were too loose for higher tension on the sheet. Sometimes there is a need to do slight clamp adjustment throughout the installation. An higher tension elongates more the string making it thinner. An experience srringer will feel it and do the proper adjustment throughout the process. Have a good day!
@@a2casius I just do not appreciate that kind of comment that does not reflect the reality at all of what is the real results and all the work done behind Sergetti Stringing Technology. I asked TennisSpin if it would be possinle to evaluate Sergetti and thay have done a great reliable and independent evaluation that reflected exactly what Sergetti benefits are and I am grateful for that since it is what players and stringers from over 60 countries are experiencing. Have a good day!
@@sergettitennis I have over 30 years of stringing experience and I have two engineering degrees and I have a seniors ITF world ranking. I have much experience of racquet technology, stringing and playing Tennis so I know precisely what I'm talking about and what you're talking about. That of course should not stop or impair you from selling your proportional stringing to less educated and less experienced users. As always, I shall have a great day.
I like this channel, but this is utter nonsense!
初め