I love how these types of shows are all over Russian TV. I've been watching the Russian language version until I saw they have an English version. Great stuff!
@@charlest1984 he is in a good health :) It's not a hockey game to choose your side. Commandante is there to help people. But overall he is on a russian side.
I think the russian experiments about military stuff is way more interesting than other countries. Thats simply because the goverment supports such shows and i love it. In USA for example you can maybe lend (With huge luck) a 20mm autocanon with dummy ammunition (Non-explosive) which is boring af. In Germany you can forget such experiments as a civilian/youtuber. You can use bow and arrows or potatoe guns maximum. In Russia you can let the weapons be weapons. 😀
Quite interesting to have a view of the inside and functions of one of the most common tanks of the world. Very keen indeed. Although as a side note, I found the shoulder patch to be neat and I would like to know where one could be obtained from, thank you much. The patch that is at time 3:43 specifically.
I'm a former Marine and I've always been told that the metal gratings are to set shaped charge warhead off before they actually touch the armor to nullify the effects
every time I whach someone fire a tank they always fired it from the outside like a wimp, so its great to that someone fires it from the inside like how you are supposed to fire it.
11:15 T-72B was designed with ERA in mind. I. E. It was not an add on. It was designed to have it from the start. T72A got add on armor, did not have it originally.
@@alikaraahmet5050 I am unware of T-72B mod without ERA in 1984 - T-72B was build, in difference to the A model, with ERA as mandatory as protection without ERA against HEAT is not in base armor package. The mod 1985 had K-1 while mod 1989 had K-5.
yes bro, first batch of T-72B were without Era and those were named as Obr. 1984, after introducing Kontakt-1 they started to build them as standard T-72B Obr. 1985 as we know it now
I like how in the beginning you can kind of see his general discomfort and solemn tone. That is a terrifying machine, and the more you know about it and what it does, the more scary it becomes. I actually learned a lot, but perhaps the most interesting was that the commander can turn the gun and fire using his viewport. So there's some redundancy as far as crew injury or whatever is concerned. It was kind of crazy that it was completely manually controlled. The tank seems very intense.
😲😱🤩😍🔝💪🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Wow ... assolutamente Fantastici questi Filmati 🙂👌🏻🔝💪🏻👏🏻👏🏻 ho scoperto da poco questo canale e ...Ti assicuro mancava "Questo Tipo" 🙂🔝💪🏻👌🏻 di Filmato ... Cosi Esaustivo .. anche Spettacolare ovviamente 😍😍🙂👌🏻 mi sto guardando Tutti i Filmati ... Artiglieria ..Armi Anticarro .. Contraerea ... Tutto ...Merita assolutamente 😍😍🔝🙂👌🏻 anzi lo consiglierò a diversi Amici ...🙂👌🏻👍🏻👊🏻 Grande Grazie x il Tuo Lavoro il Risultato è assolutamente Spettacolare ....😉👌🏻🔝💪🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
I was told by an old Russian tank crew member that the requirement for a tank crewman was between was being 5.5 to 5.8 in height and 140 to 160 lb in weight, for the old T54-55 and T62 tanks during the cold war era?
Just noticing all the ATGM comments in this section and wanted to point out that, per shot, the tank's firepower is vastly more economical than any $100,000-per-shot missile, and is therefore much more practical for general purpose applications inside 3km than man portable rockets. Even assuming the average HE shell is $10,000, that's still an order of magnitude cheaper than expending a guided missile every time anything remotely hardened needs to be engaged. For this reason alone, tanks are worth keeping around, regardless of what happens to be able to kill them. A lot of Russia's losses are also down to very poor tactics, so it stands to reason tanks used by a more competent force will perform better.
17:26 - kumul. 19:32 kumuľ., 21:12 OF, 22:37 podkalibernyj, 23:35 podkalibernyj (BOPS na russkom da ?) 23:46 OF Is the gun leaking that it smokes from the side ? You shot HEAT, HEAT, HE-Frag, APFSDS 2x, then HE-Frag. Those sandbags with a HE-frag hit would have completely destroyed the place. At least you did not destroy them, so to say, with subcaliber arrow :P Otherwise nice, I cant really write in Russian and I dont use translators. Privjet iz vostočnoj Slovakii :) u 'našej' natovskej armii sovremennyje modeli T-72M1 izdelannyje v 87-93 godach :)) my nikogda v nikakych vyborach NATO nevybirali, oni prichodili sami, zdelali perevorot v 98-godu. Od etich vremeni u nas sovereniteta nebylo, v 2004-tom kak propagandisty mozgy myli v etot god, uže na Ukrajine perjvyj majdan byl. S pomošču uže ne našich - vassalskych prostitutov v politike, vsjo što šlo, prodali našim 'druzjam' iz zapada. 2014 tovo goda tože predateli pomagali zapadu v uničtažani ukrajiny - oni govorili što Ukrajine nužnaja 'demokratija' - diktat zapada kak zdez. Svobodnyje SMI net. Korporatnyje eto zapad, ne my. Tupyje Ukrajinci ničevo neznajut i vjerjat iľuzijam što vsjo budet lučše na zapade. Zapad eto imperija nesvobody dľa meňa. Neznaju kak v Rossiji, no lož , propaganda zapada eto priam karikatura, ne reaľnosť i vysmech. Što v SMI proischodit net reaľnosť, eto što oni choťat by reaľnosťu bylo. Jevrosojuz eto kak staryj sojuz i nacistskyj/fašistskyj v odnom. Slovakov i Čechov kotoryje vojevali za Donbas dostavajut 20-25 let v ťuľmje, no kto za NATO, vsjo, tišina, takovo kakby, net. NATO eto ne my. Da, rossija byla slaboj v 90-ch i eto po čemu Zapad rozširil NATO, protiv nas. Nas choťat kak kanonenfutter pro amerikancov. Nemci mnogie znajut tože, no amerikanskyj diktat do sich por nezakončilsja. Ja za to, što by my nervalis do zadnej časti ni zapada ni Rossiji, no Zapad neponimajet slovo, net. A tože vremja i vozmožnostej bylo pro mir, načalo v 90-tych. Oni nechoteli. Deržites, buďte svobodnymi i chorošimi :) Zapad ne naši druzja, mnogi iz nas znajut. Da, karta Evropy v mnogom kak v 41-2 godach.
@@vladdragomir6447 You mean the Javelin Anti-Tank missiles, with Ukraine discovering that 85% showed up with Dead Batteries and no battery charger included?
translation "scrap" incorrect. Lom can be translated as "scrap", but also as "crowbar" or to be more accurate - heavy piece of steel, that the AP round is.
The T-90A withstood the blow in Syria, there are a bunch of videos on UA-cam where the BGM-71 could not penetrate it! The entire crew of the Syrians just got scared and ran away, in fact, the tank could continue the fight! The tank was slightly repaired and it was in battle again! The T-72B3 has the same dynamic armor!
@@lumberjackagies5158 I was speaking to the KOT guy saying that atgms can kill the tanks. He's pretending they can't kill tanks. I know very well that tanks are relevant. Although current atgms can kill any modern tank.
Since when are they supposed to stop NLAWs? Their purpose is to stop RPGs shot from high positions and to stop grenades/rigger mortar shells being dropped by drones
I wonder how is your life because you are writing this BS. He is just showcasing a tank and you write something about Javelin. And how can you know that this exact tank was in ukraine and was blown up when in the video the tanks number is censored. And you are here acting like only Russian tanks turrets can be blown off.
@@JC-XL Ukraine had supply of T-64 that were using as their main tank while Russia had supply of T-72. So main user of T-72 was Russia at the start of their aggression. And no, I am not saying that Ukraine had no T-72 - for self-proclaimed Sherlocks
I find the stinger hard to believe yet, the recent Ukraine war shows that it does great agains javelins. (the amunition cooks off, the crew is instantly cremated & as a cherry on top of the cake the turret pops off so you have a open casket funeral.) I think that tanks are getting obsolete on the modern day battlefield
@@visionary_8865 You mean, the turret blown of or a ammo cookoff. Turret blown of is (i think) unlikely since even the older versions stored most ammo in the turret behind blast doors.
Doubt a stinger would. You usually don't use anti aircraft missiles against armor, as they don't penetrate very well at all. Javelins and NLAWs on the other hand...
@@TheProblembaer2 find me the fields. Or didn't you know that Russian soldiers were cylcled out on the last influx. If ukranian numbers are correct, there should have been no troops to cycle out 😑 Not even America is willing to stand behind Zelenskys numbers. Find me those fields.
@@deven6518he abrams has a small storage area in the hull but it has blowoff panels also to prevent a ammorack but most of the time it’s filled with extra supplies like food or water
I love how these types of shows are all over Russian TV. I've been watching the Russian language version until I saw they have an English version. Great stuff!
"Combat Approved" is one I was watching for a while
You're not quite right. This show is not present anywhere but youtube/boosty.
This guy is a volunteer in Donetsk.
@@КириллГофтенюк for Russia or Ukraine, and is he still alive? Either way I hope he’s okay, I love his videos
@@charlest1984 he is in a good health :)
It's not a hockey game to choose your side. Commandante is there to help people. But overall he is on a russian side.
I think the russian experiments about military stuff is way more interesting than other countries. Thats simply because the goverment supports such shows and i love it. In USA for example you can maybe lend (With huge luck) a 20mm autocanon with dummy ammunition (Non-explosive) which is boring af. In Germany you can forget such experiments as a civilian/youtuber. You can use bow and arrows or potatoe guns maximum. In Russia you can let the weapons be weapons. 😀
Dude gives literal meaning to high calibre & mayhem.
I hope he is ok… stay safe rusky brother. Thank you for the knowledge and entertainment
Damn they put alot of work into these videos
Quite interesting to have a view of the inside and functions of one of the most common tanks of the world. Very keen indeed. Although as a side note, I found the shoulder patch to be neat and I would like to know where one could be obtained from, thank you much. The patch that is at time 3:43 specifically.
aliexpress my job is "top secret".
I'm a former Marine and I've always been told that the metal gratings are to set shaped charge warhead off before they actually touch the armor to nullify the effects
Great video. T72 is awesome. Thanks buddy.
nah t-90 is better
@@nonedibledonutHe released a video about the T-90 m for the Russian-speaking audience
every time I whach someone fire a tank they always fired it from the outside like a wimp, so its great to that someone fires it from the inside like how you are supposed to fire it.
How do you fire a tank from outside?
11:15 T-72B was designed with ERA in mind. I. E. It was not an add on. It was designed to have it from the start. T72A got add on armor, did not have it originally.
they first built T-72B Obr.1984 then upgraded it to T-72B Obr. 1985 with Kontakt-1
@@alikaraahmet5050 I am unware of T-72B mod without ERA in 1984 - T-72B was build, in difference to the A model, with ERA as mandatory as protection without ERA against HEAT is not in base armor package. The mod 1985 had K-1 while mod 1989 had K-5.
yes bro, first batch of T-72B were without Era and those were named as Obr. 1984, after introducing Kontakt-1 they started to build them as standard T-72B Obr. 1985 as we know it now
@@tomk3732 T-72B Obr. 1984 is the exact same of T-72B but without Era installed.
much like the difference between T-80B and T-80BV
Best gun programme ever!
Superb video! India's massive Armoured Corps backbone is still the "Combat Improved Ajeya"(based on T-72M1)
Not smart😂
I’m awestruck. I’ve never seen anything like this.
Тебе стоило родиться в России
18:52 This would’ve been awesome with a few ballistic gel dummies instead of cardboard cutouts
I like how in the beginning you can kind of see his general discomfort and solemn tone. That is a terrifying machine, and the more you know about it and what it does, the more scary it becomes.
I actually learned a lot, but perhaps the most interesting was that the commander can turn the gun and fire using his viewport. So there's some redundancy as far as crew injury or whatever is concerned. It was kind of crazy that it was completely manually controlled. The tank seems very intense.
When he said the 125mm ammunition is just below you, I found myself smiling and thinking, that's the turret ejection mechanism!🤭
But it's actually not,hull stored HE ammo causes the turret to separate
@@gumelini1 Its actually the ignition of all the propellant bags that causes the explosion and the turret to be ejected into the air.
@@xxch4osxx it doesn't really
tanks lose turrets even without autoloader, this is laws of physics
How the hell do you have less than 2K subs?
I'm in there like swimwear.
VERY GOOD TESTER ÓTIMO TESTE COM TANK T72 👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 🇧🇷
😲😱🤩😍🔝💪🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Wow ... assolutamente Fantastici questi Filmati 🙂👌🏻🔝💪🏻👏🏻👏🏻 ho scoperto da poco questo canale e ...Ti assicuro mancava "Questo Tipo" 🙂🔝💪🏻👌🏻 di Filmato ... Cosi Esaustivo .. anche Spettacolare ovviamente 😍😍🙂👌🏻 mi sto guardando Tutti i Filmati ... Artiglieria ..Armi Anticarro .. Contraerea ... Tutto ...Merita assolutamente 😍😍🔝🙂👌🏻 anzi lo consiglierò a diversi Amici ...🙂👌🏻👍🏻👊🏻 Grande Grazie x il Tuo Lavoro il Risultato è assolutamente Spettacolare ....😉👌🏻🔝💪🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
The famous jack in the box Tank
I was told by an old Russian tank crew member that the requirement for a tank crewman was between was being 5.5 to 5.8 in height and 140 to 160 lb in weight, for the old T54-55 and T62 tanks during the cold war era?
Just noticing all the ATGM comments in this section and wanted to point out that, per shot, the tank's firepower is vastly more economical than any $100,000-per-shot missile, and is therefore much more practical for general purpose applications inside 3km than man portable rockets. Even assuming the average HE shell is $10,000, that's still an order of magnitude cheaper than expending a guided missile every time anything remotely hardened needs to be engaged.
For this reason alone, tanks are worth keeping around, regardless of what happens to be able to kill them. A lot of Russia's losses are also down to very poor tactics, so it stands to reason tanks used by a more competent force will perform better.
It's cheaper, HE 155mm price went up dramatically and is still only 3000 Euro. So this must be way cheaper. Few hundred USD.
I love this channel
master piece!!!!^^
Can you test rds41 ?
17:26 - kumul. 19:32 kumuľ., 21:12 OF, 22:37 podkalibernyj, 23:35 podkalibernyj (BOPS na russkom da ?) 23:46 OF
Is the gun leaking that it smokes from the side ? You shot HEAT, HEAT, HE-Frag, APFSDS 2x, then HE-Frag. Those sandbags with a HE-frag hit would have completely destroyed the place. At least you did not destroy them, so to say, with subcaliber arrow :P Otherwise nice, I cant really write in Russian and I dont use translators. Privjet iz vostočnoj Slovakii :) u 'našej' natovskej armii sovremennyje modeli T-72M1 izdelannyje v 87-93 godach :)) my nikogda v nikakych vyborach NATO nevybirali, oni prichodili sami, zdelali perevorot v 98-godu. Od etich vremeni u nas sovereniteta nebylo, v 2004-tom kak propagandisty mozgy myli v etot god, uže na Ukrajine perjvyj majdan byl. S pomošču uže ne našich - vassalskych prostitutov v politike, vsjo što šlo, prodali našim 'druzjam' iz zapada. 2014 tovo goda tože predateli pomagali zapadu v uničtažani ukrajiny - oni govorili što Ukrajine nužnaja 'demokratija' - diktat zapada kak zdez. Svobodnyje SMI net. Korporatnyje eto zapad, ne my. Tupyje Ukrajinci ničevo neznajut i vjerjat iľuzijam što vsjo budet lučše na zapade. Zapad eto imperija nesvobody dľa meňa. Neznaju kak v Rossiji, no lož , propaganda zapada eto priam karikatura, ne reaľnosť i vysmech. Što v SMI proischodit net reaľnosť, eto što oni choťat by reaľnosťu bylo. Jevrosojuz eto kak staryj sojuz i nacistskyj/fašistskyj v odnom. Slovakov i Čechov kotoryje vojevali za Donbas dostavajut 20-25 let v ťuľmje, no kto za NATO, vsjo, tišina, takovo kakby, net. NATO eto ne my. Da, rossija byla slaboj v 90-ch i eto po čemu Zapad rozširil NATO, protiv nas. Nas choťat kak kanonenfutter pro amerikancov. Nemci mnogie znajut tože, no amerikanskyj diktat do sich por nezakončilsja. Ja za to, što by my nervalis do zadnej časti ni zapada ni Rossiji, no Zapad neponimajet slovo, net. A tože vremja i vozmožnostej bylo pro mir, načalo v 90-tych. Oni nechoteli. Deržites, buďte svobodnymi i chorošimi :) Zapad ne naši druzja, mnogi iz nas znajut. Da, karta Evropy v mnogom kak v 41-2 godach.
Napsal jsi to jak idiot, ani ne azbukou ani ne slovensky a použil jsi slovenské háčky a čářky
👏👏👏👍👍👍❤️👋😉
Looks like it's a museum piece.
Не это списанная техника
T-72, an unbeatable tank.
😅😅the javelin know about this ? 😂😂
@@vladdragomir6447 You mean the Javelin Anti-Tank missiles, with Ukraine discovering that 85% showed up with Dead Batteries and no battery charger included?
@@sashadala346 NLAW exist
@@tafdiz The Tank is only part of the Battlefield equation.
@@tafdiz Scotch?
How am I just seeing this channel?!?
The name of the channel is quite literal
I'm Indian but I love Russia Indian army t bhisma sem tank
What is it on that T-72 turret, that is so secret it have to be blurred away?
Insignia or Unit Number
The huge swastika they painted on "Z"..
@@Batchelli no swastikas and other nazi symbols are only seen on Ukrainian vehicles.
@@Batchellipeople are mad about a Z?
@@rogerio7546 Yeh, i dont know, something about a well documented case of genocide.
So this is what the inside of the Turret Tossing Olympics World Champion looks like. 😄
In all seriousness, it's an impressive machine for it's time.
translation "scrap" incorrect.
Lom can be translated as "scrap", but also as "crowbar" or to be more accurate - heavy piece of steel, that the AP round is.
War is hell
Omg my man love the videos
Команданте шпарит классно по англицки!
Got to admit t-72B got the looks and the vibe..but nowadays most ATGM can get trough 1000++mm of steel.. even ERA won't stop it.
yeah, some people say tank combat is obsolete.
The T-90A withstood the blow in Syria, there are a bunch of videos on UA-cam where the BGM-71 could not penetrate it! The entire crew of the Syrians just got scared and ran away, in fact, the tank could continue the fight! The tank was slightly repaired and it was in battle again! The T-72B3 has the same dynamic armor!
@@злойкот-г1т The war in Ukraine says otherwise.
@@johncee853 the war in Ukraine further proves that tanks are still very relevant
@@lumberjackagies5158 I was speaking to the KOT guy saying that atgms can kill the tanks. He's pretending they can't kill tanks. I know very well that tanks are relevant. Although current atgms can kill any modern tank.
They should do an episode about "cope cages" and how amazing they are at preventing NLAWs from blowing up this tank.
Wow your so funny. You realize they would blow up any tank right? Poor bastards are just using their tanks stupidly. They need more infantry
Since when are they supposed to stop NLAWs? Their purpose is to stop RPGs shot from high positions and to stop grenades/rigger mortar shells being dropped by drones
They did, sort of.. ua-cam.com/video/_y0wbcVFn8g/v-deo.html
If they wanted to stop nlaw with cages they should install the vertically not horizontally
15:52 it’s depleted uranium probably 😂
Tungsten as far as I know.
The Russian Oven 😂
Anyone know why the powder charge smells like chocolate?😂😂
Nitro glycerin? Tnt? Sugar bombs?
@@grantmccoy6739 it’s nitrocellulose, but idk why it would smell like chocolate.
Maybe museum piece is not the right words. Unmaintained is more like it.
Like most Russian tanks
Not tower, just turret... You are still talking about the tank, and not about the castle.
I think it maybe a metaphor.
I have never seen a clean russian tank in my life time!
natural camo why clean it
It is over 50 years old...
Love the pants
Same, I wonder what they are
What kind of sweatshirt is he wearing?
stalker sunrise sweatshirt from chernobyl, it usually has a Lvl-III kevlar vest and a GP-5 with it but it's still good.
This exact tank in this video was pressed into service where two days in battle its turret flew to space thanks to St.Javelin🎉🎉🎉
not a made-up story
I wonder how is your life because you are writing this BS. He is just showcasing a tank and you write something about Javelin. And how can you know that this exact tank was in ukraine and was blown up when in the video the tanks number is censored. And you are here acting like only Russian tanks turrets can be blown off.
Awesome man. Russian tanks are the most beautiful ones.
😲
i love you
Can anyone identify his pants? I want
16.54 is he talking about Ukrainians...?
Looks more like a german soldier from ww2.
These cutouts have ww2 German helmets
1:28 some of those are in Ukraine rn
And yes finally a good channel that involves mbts literally shooting targets like this and we review it
I hear these are blown up all over Ukraina these days... :)
Most of them Ukrainian ...
heard it on cnn ;)
Awell obviously the t72 is exported throughout eastern Europe, they are used on all sides including polish, so no shit Sherlock
Is there a pointless tank?Abrams? We haven't seen this before! Leopard? Maybe! But the Turks have already shown!
@@JC-XL Ukraine had supply of T-64 that were using as their main tank while Russia had supply of T-72. So main user of T-72 was Russia at the start of their aggression.
And no, I am not saying that Ukraine had no T-72 - for self-proclaimed Sherlocks
The narrator is drugged!
You should use American cutouts
All I see is a metal box with 200s in it...Sorry, but it's true. A stinger can obliterate it. Even with reactive armour.
So we find one Nato devotee who just cant stand this video
I find the stinger hard to believe yet, the recent Ukraine war shows that it does great agains javelins. (the amunition cooks off, the crew is instantly cremated & as a cherry on top of the cake the turret pops off so you have a open casket funeral.) I think that tanks are getting obsolete on the modern day battlefield
@@poucxs9246 agree, Ive seen same thing happening to M1 Abrams in Saudi, hit by a Russian Korent missile. Poor abrams almost looked as barbequed
@@visionary_8865 You mean, the turret blown of or a ammo cookoff. Turret blown of is (i think) unlikely since even the older versions stored most ammo in the turret behind blast doors.
Doubt a stinger would. You usually don't use anti aircraft missiles against armor, as they don't penetrate very well at all. Javelins and NLAWs on the other hand...
🇵🇭
Ukranian MBT,all they have left atleast.
Now it's been shown as 💩
Are these the tanks Ukraine is killing with drones?
maybe in your dreams
yup
T-72 T -90💩💩🇷🇺💩🇷🇺
The couch analyst told us😏!
@@Mr_Rebel_254 un altro 🤡 URSS 💩💩🇷🇺
..
The T-72 is also now a record setting Tank. It holds the record for the highest explosive Turret launch among several others. Слава Герою!!
you dont want to live in this tank who's in a competition of who is the highest turret tossing Olympic in Ukraine
FAKE! FAKE! FAKE! Its not a real Russian tank because the turret has not pooped off!
We will see burning Abrams soon. Fun fact, the abrams also pops it's turret because there's a storage for shells inside the hull
@@deven6518 Right now we see fields of dead Russian soldiers.
@@TheProblembaer2 find me the fields. Or didn't you know that Russian soldiers were cylcled out on the last influx. If ukranian numbers are correct, there should have been no troops to cycle out 😑
Not even America is willing to stand behind Zelenskys numbers. Find me those fields.
@@deven6518he abrams has a small storage area in the hull but it has blowoff panels also to prevent a ammorack but most of the time it’s filled with extra supplies like food or water
@@deven6518ну вот и дождались, уже 5 Абрамсов уничтожено😂