Scots judges rule parliament suspension unlawful
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 вер 2019
- Amid what is now a full-blown constitutional crisis, all eyes will be on the Supreme Court next week, when the country’s top judges will decide whether Scotland's Court of Session was correct in ruling that the Prime Minister acted in an "improper" and "unlawful" way in suspending parliament for five weeks. Opposition MPs leapt on the ruling, saying that parliament should be recalled immediately. Former attorney general and Tory rebel Dominic Grieve said that if Boris Johnson had misled the Queen over the reasons for prorogation, then he should resign.
(Subscribe: bit.ly/C4_News_Subscribe)
-----------------------
Follow us on Instagram - / channel4news
2525 the world is united in the federal states of planets except britain who still want to leave the eu
So we will be a bastion of independence and democracy
@Mario lol like if any European can agree with the reasons for UK leave EU, kinda tax evasion...racism...far right nationalism etc etc, your comment already tells me a litle about you....
Henk Duym Come off it! Are you having a laugh? The world united?....
Mario it’s gonna last longer than Britain pal 😂
Poland and Hungary don’t use the Euro because the E.U. doesn’t require any country to use use the Euro. Italy and Greece kept the Euro because their budget deficits means leaving the Euro currency would reduce the value of pensions and government salaries.
David Cameron's legacy everyone!
Another ex Bullingdon Club Elitist with pretentions to represent the majority of the UK population.
How much damage have Cameron, Osborne and BoJo The Clown inflicted on this country?
...As they operate in a zero-consequence (to them) environment.
SinnedNogara i think the funniest part of all this is he has bought himself a countryside cottage to write his memoirs in. Just imagining him sitting in the sun while the UK goes through this crisis makes me laugh. How ridiculous
@Wesley Slippers Yeah. The Lurpak ad campaign didn't give him the traction he expected.
Hit the nail on the head!!!!!
A true Democrat clearly has no place in a feux democracy.
I want one of those scepters that the Scottish court has 😂
You’ll not get one unless you learn to spell sceptres
@@derekwhyle1884 Funny sod! That's great! ;)
It’s a fancy garden torch. Try on alibaba.com 😁
Derek Whyle Damn, it’s always something. 😂Never let iPhone autocorrect for you 😂😂
Derek Whyle LIGHTEN UP Derek! 🙄
I don’t need a queen’s speech
You would if you had to set a parliamentary timetable
Nobody needs a queens speech. We only need the queen for tourism
@@purplerings1969 making up the constitution as you go along? I see you are a Bercow disciple
@@Spearca In theory.. but setting the timetable also allows time for opposition day early motions... Plus choosing of select committees and a whole bunch of other tedious admin functions. It also counts as a vote of confidence.. so it allows the opposition to agree/ disagree with the parliamentary direction.
Michael Pilgrim yes we need a queen speech
I love it when C4 News puts opinion into people's mouths.
“We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it.” - George Orwell, 1984
Hence we need to leave the EU immediately and at any costs.
Macdonald Maurice the difference is we can vote him out, unlike the Eu ministers
Boris did not "seize power" - he had to ask her majesty. Think it through.
@@macdonaldmaurice when did anyone say anything about making Boris dictator for life?
@@sharp14x The EU did not seize power. Britain IS the EU, as is France, Germany, The Netherlands and all the rest. Don't you know how it works?
Judge: We rule Prorouging to be illegal
GTA: Aggghhh shiyt... here we go again....
Not at all Manchurian Candidate. But deceiving the Queen and trying to deceive the whole country about the reason could well be unlawful.
Come on, you've all got to be enjoying the ride. Yeah we're losing money but at least we're entertained. Are you not entertained?
@@stevepetty7009 Why doesn't the opposition want an election? Why all these machinations? It can only be because they suspect that the people want out of the EU.
@@jamesedwards.1069 Absolutely not. This does not follow.
It is pretty generally accepted that the majority really dont want Corbyn in number 10. They think he would wreck the economy. They may think a Corbyn government would be even worse than a no deal Brexit.
This is why another referendum is the only way of telling how people stand on the single issue of Brexit.
@@stevepetty7009 The present Parliament has got to go. It's a matter of lost confidence.
As for Jeremy Corbyn, of course he's a disaster, but he would be a temporary problem. The problem of being in the EU is eternal unless Brexit happens.
Isn't it the case that the opposition to Brexit does not want new elections for Parliament because they know they will lose? But if there is another referendum on Brexit they might be able to swamp the vote count with, for example, 150% turnout in the strongly anti-Brexit regions.
This is slowly turning into a GWAR concert.
YaY! GWAR FTW!
The Cuttlefish of Cthulhu for PM 🤘
Reading the xenophobic and factually incorrect statements from Brexiters below, I'm not surprised the country is such a state.
The country is in "such a state" because the losers in a public referendum broke their word and violated the principle of democracy that losers consent to allow the winners to have their way. You did it. You personally and all the others like you that just will not accept the democratic result of a vote if it doesn't go your way.
His Divine Shadow if it was legally binding the result would have been ruled as void. Ironically the only thing stopping it being voided is the legal fact that it was advisory.
SJW alert to tell us all we are xenophobic for even daring to talk about immigration issues.
Indeed. Special thanks to pretend Brits too for adding to the excitement.
@@Calcearius What are the issues regarding immigration?
A break! a break! What do they call the absence they just came back from a holiday.
Last week the English court didn't have the documents secured by MPs.
The case was heard in Scotland because it could be heard earlier.
We shall see.
so they read all them documents in 5 minutes ? no counter given fair ? this is going nowhere
Popcorn headlines. Try as they might, they know all too well the sledgehammers a comin for them.
Sound like religious rambling .."and the rain shall turn into blood and the horses shall moo..."
MrKingdig it means we’ve had enough and we are removing subversive EU fanatics
Not only was Boris found to have broken the law, but it calls into question the professional competence of the Attorney General, Geoffrey Cox.
Two courts found it lawful, one court found it unlawful. Wait for the final verdict of the supreme court eh?
The law hasn't been broken
Its civil not criminal so its not "broken the law".
When you get in a dispute with a salesman because the product was provided faulty, he hasn't broken the law, he has just breached his contract with you and you are seeking civil compensation.
California Dreamin' we only heard from Scottish judges let’s not forget.
His Divine Shadow one court so called Scottish court no wonder grrrrrrrrr waste of time
Secession is always illegal. Because it is a kind of secession, I'm sure that Brexit is also problematic legally to some extent. But legality takes a back seat to political and military considerations when fundamental questions of sovereignty and empire are involved, and of course everyone knows this. In fact, I'd say that the best reason not to enter in to relationships like the EU in the first place is because the only way to leave is being carried out in a pine box.
It was a blatant dive in the box and the referee consulted VR .no penalty maybe a sending off well we will see on Tuesday..
Love it - Well said!
Here's to the shortest British premierships in recent British history! Huzzah!!
Nope.
@@AICabal why
Doubt it !!
@@johnregan2443 Why
@Silverclod 141 Can you fight elections whilst in prison?
Someone needs to tell Boris the law is not a child on the opposing team in a rugby match.
Or a German footballer.
Just like you lot did when you lost the vote. This is why we are in a mess because of twats like you ...what a wanker you really are.
Bring on the clowns...oh wait, they are already here.
These judges know what Boris's real intentions are because of a submission from infalable "Pre-crime" psychics.
They went on their summer holidays, they didnt cancel conferences, they asked the queen, Scottish judges say its illegal..
what a joke
The Scottish turds don't recognize the current royal family....... don't you remember Mary ?
Boris take it to the European courts of justice 🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧👍
that would be priceless.
Is "The Sun" going to be their Legal Reps?
Send Jacob Rees-Mogg lol
Michael McCullagh 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
sugarpuffbutty 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Clowns to left of me jokers to the right here I am 🤦♂️. Leave means Leave Democracy
Jon Snow did a much better job here than Cathy Newman, who mishandled the interview on Jan 16, 2018 and still hasn’t publicly acknowledged her wrongdoing. Cathy Newman is such an awful human being.
This government lost 4 votes and one court ruling. This is at the very least very embarrassing for any politician. Heck, you even have a supreme court justice saying that a prorogation of that sort was too much. Ouch
The Supreme court cannot override Her Majesty the Queens decision to prorogue parliament. If the UK supreme court finds that in their conclusion that it was unlawful, they'll have to ask the queen to have parliament re called. She'll most likely accept the advice, but can also refuse and no one can do anything then
@@MillenniumGaming1014 mehh. The queen as every monarch in modern democracy is more of a figurehead, I don't think that she would care to ignore the advice of her courts. At least that's how I see it.
Scots law and English law are very different. Law in Ireland and Northern Ireland is closer to English law than either of them is to Scots law, which is mixed system, rooted in Roman law. Therefore it is possible for the courts in different jurisdictions to come to different conclusions.
Although this is within a scottish court, the law applicable here is UK constitutional law, not traditional civil law within scotland that may differ from UK law (in most case it doesn't because the judiciary are lazy and just take English authority as Scottish authority (to which there are many complaints about this)).
The reason why the decisions are so different, is because the Court of Session here is making leaps of faith into politics through their legal window. This judgement is not legally minded, nor does it logically follow and they can quote no authority to support their conclusion. Just wait for the full judgement and you can read how many acrobatic tricks they wil have to try and pull of for this one. I can accept a decision that BoJo gave advise ultra vires/unreasonably/unlawfully etc. However, I cannot accept that this therefore makes the prorogation unlawful as this prorogation is an absolute power of the crown with no act of parliament involved or raised as as authority that can proffer any restriction to that power in this usage.
So the reasoning behind the prorogation is irrelevant.
@standardleft Breaking the law and unlawful are different things. This is a civil matter.
Even if we concede he acted unlawful, lets go as far as to say that he willfully deceived the Queen with his advise.
Even then, the prorogation is not unlawful, only the advise is unlawful. The right to prorogue is absolute. So the reasoning behind it is irrelevant.
@@Serfdomftw Hi..Thanks for the information...my understanding is that this is referred up to the Supreme Court and that the judges must represent and consider all 3 legal systems of the UK when ruling...is that the case?
@@shelleyphilcox4743 There are not 3 legal systems. There is only 1 legal system and that is the UK legal system. It may seem pendatic, but this distinction is important as UK law suprecedes Scottish authority.
Although Scotland operates half house between a civil and a common law system. However, there are many occassions where judges have accidentally used English authority in Scottish cases when such authority is not valid. Moreover, constitutionally the law of the UK is that of the law of England in essence, because UK constitutional law derives from Parliament and the crown and this is the law no matter where you are in the UK. Parliament and the crown is derivative of English tradition prior to the union, and thus the law itself is mirrored.
I've digressed substantially at this point. The fact of the matter is that in that the Crown has a number of powers under its prerogative one of which is prerogation. The Crown's powers can only be restricted by statute, and the actions of ministers are only able to be challenged under certain heads such as "ultra vires", "unreasonableness" etc. All of these are where the minister has acted outside of his station or wrongly within his station such that his decision was ultra vires.
Because Prerogation requires Royal assent. It is not an act of the minister, but an act of the Queen. The Queen cannot be reviewed, which is why they are challenging the act of the minister. However, even if the minister were to act in wrongly in every way imagineable, the act of the Queen the source of authority of the prerogation will always prevail.
The only thing that can directly challenge the Queen is legislation passed through parliament. No such legislation exists to limit prerogation in a way which would render the current circumstances as unlawful. Therefore, the prerogation is not justiceable. The Miller case was justiceable as the prerogative to make treaties, in revoking Article 50 would affect national law, and the crown does not have the power to unilaterally alter our law withotu permission of parliament. The previous decision was on a technical point that does not apply here.
@@Serfdomftw put this in lay man's terms please? Sounds like you're making some sense 😅
Just heard on radio 4 some tory ( didn't catch his name ) saying " It doesn't matter - its not the high court of England " !!! To be fair he probably meant the UK Supreme Court but the freudian slip sure shows you what the Eton toff brigade really think .
Exactly and that's why Brexit will doom us because the Scots will then leave us alone on this island being ruled over by a cabal of Eton educated professional political operators ruling for their own economic advantage.
@@outlawJosieFox You'll be more than welcome to move up here if we gain Independence! 🏴🏴
Andreios Wilson sound like a plan 👍
@@outlawJosieFox Well It'll leave you and not me . I have a french wife and daughter and intend applying for a french passport to remain European which is important to me . That doesn't stop me being English toll the day I die . I was on my feet shouting at the telly with everybody else when Ben Stokes pulled off a miracle . Still all is not lost . The Labs and the Libs and the SNP could grab parliament in the coming election and stop all this brexit bullshit yet . Keep believing as bojo said . Good luck to you mate !!
@@Perl88 lol I might just do that! Apart from anything if global warming keeps on I might need the cooler climate and I would fit right in being a redhead!
Judges ruled within 5 minutes, not even long enough to hear the case for the prosecution 😂😂😂
just enough time for Gina Miller to transfer bribe money into judges account, or maybe she went the full nine yards and jumped on his …...
I think both Dominic Cummings and Trump have been advising Boris. But even I understand that the the British wouldn't tolerate the Trump-like behaviour that has been going unchallenged by the USA.
Exactly right - and that's what they are trying to do, ignore the Laws and if anyone challenges them, call them 'undemocratic'! Absolute BS and we wont tolerate it, ignore it or accept it.
Giving away British sovereignty away to elitists in the EU is unlawful.
Claudette Earle. I'm American and our system is very different from yours. I can't say I understand exactly how yours works but I have empathy for the chaos you are currently experiencing. We too are in uncharted territory with this ridiculous President we have currently. But I want to say that Trump's behavior is NOT going unchallenged here. Congress has subpoenaed multiple people in Trump's Admin. Several people have been tried and convicted and sent to prison. The closer they are to Trump though the more his admin is refusing to honor the subpoenas forcing the issue in court that Trump and his Republican Senate has packed with his own judges. They are also ignoring the court orders when a judge issues one. This is unprecedented and no one seems to know what to do about it. The House of Representatives, controlled by the Democratic Party, keeps investigating and holding more hearings. They are essentially doing impeachment investigations without filing the Articles of Impeachment Our Constitution has a process for removing a President and it's not easy. I wouldn't call us complacent at all---people are riled up and protesting but you might not get a good sense of that. We are a big country with 50 states, all of whom have states' rights that they like to invoke. Think of it like the EU, a collection of individual countries each with their own culture, laws, political structures, settlement history, ethnicity issues, etc. We aren't a united people. Trump won with only a little over 1/3 of the vote. Most of us can't tolerate him.
USA unchallenged!!!! Really have not been watching the news in USA. Just like here they don't accept the results of the vote and have tried everything to impeach trump/revoke article 50. We have it worst in UK as we don't have main stream alternative 🦊 to BBC Sky and channel 4 which are all anti Brexit.
You'd rather have the global elite enacting Agenda 21, as planned ???
But the MP's now have a fixed term of office and have refused snap elections. Thus the former justices views are outdated based on the prior act of parliament, of fixed terms. Before whenever a PM lost a key vote, there would be snap elections and a new majority PM chosen. Therefore the right to suspend parliament is now a right of the PM during his full term of office. Secondly, the results of the referendum must be preserved and not circumvented by the opposition MPs.
BS. The Law matters and MPs are not above it. This game of letting MPs lie their heads of and do and say whatever they like without ANY accountability has got to be called out and ended. WE choose the MPs - we need to choose more wisely and check out facts. If we keep running on emotion and empty slogans, we will suffer the consequences and it will be on US and not the MPs - it's OUR JOB to choose the best, not keep tolerating BS.
@@sugarpuffbutty The Queen needs to bring about a written Constitution, a true Senate, an non-adverserail House of Commons: what is the point of a "shadow Government", with fixed terms? The PM, has the full authority to desolve Parliament, during his full term of office. There needs to be a full restructuring of the institutions of the UK government and its political structure, before the Queen's reign ends. If the next general election brings about another hung parliament, your country is doomed.
@@sugarpuffbutty If law matters, then all parties that promised in their manifesto's for the 2017 GE to follow the 'will of the people and respect the result of the referendum' should be held accountable? They are also going against their 'Oath of Allegiance' sworn by when taking their seat.
Nigel Evans is the new Andrew Bridgen or Marc Francois ... slime
Where is Francois these days?
LOL: "I call as my first witness....THE QUEEN" ; "Tell me maam, were you misguided?"; LOL
Suspending Brexit is unlawful. WE VOTED TO LEAVE.
If Boris' Brexit plans are so great why is he so scared to let anyone scrutinise them. He is the real chicken.
They won’t give him the chance
mitos meios the plan was to leave this elitist cult full stop then change the U.K. into a democracy.
No more social engineering
@@amigaamigo5307 But that wasn't the plan though. Throughout the Brexit campaign we were constantly told we would be leaving with a deal. Farage and Johnson both said so. Not one single person on the Brexit side said we would leave without a deal during the campaign. And that getting a deal would be "the easiest thing in the world". Now that's been proven to be false, Brexiters are pretending that "No Deal" was the plan all along.
@@amigaamigo5307 It doesn't get much more elitist than Johnson and Rees Mogg. Both went to Eton and Rees Mogg himself said that he was "born into the establishment". Not exactly your working class heroes!
Timex 17 Cameron said to leave would mean leaving the customs union the freedom of movement and so forth I never heard about a deal.
I was part of lexit which aimed to be completely free of the Eu.
The Eu has caused a lot of social damage to Europe
They broke Greece caused nations like Italia to fall only to feed Germany and France.
The U.K. was never meant to be in the Eu thatcher thought the U.K. could have equal control but realised we aren’t welcome her last speech warned us.
Then you had the likes or Tory labour leaders like Tony Blair who wanted us to join the euro many claiming doom and gloom if we didn’t.
They demonise National pride in order to create a superstate, if they make all nations the same there will be no patriotism.
The Marrakesh treaty and agenda 2030 show in part their vision.
We need political change in the U.K. but that can’t happen within this Eu empire.
Who are the new commissioners? Ex Imf and Goldman Sachs employees who were involved with bankrupting Greece fraud and corruption.
We can’t vote for the commission and with so many nations with their own needs no voice is heard, just call us racists homophobic islamophobes just to shut us up.
The question now should be should we leave but why they won’t let us go.
Not surprised up here in North Korea sorry Scotland the judiciary always does what’s expected remember Al megrahi no objection no appeal seriously Scottish politics is so elitist and none confrontational is like Pravda and the Politburo
Are you being repressed because your side cant win an election in Scotland? Comparison with the ussr suggests your grip on reality is poor.
Sadly the reality grip that needs to sink in and not unique to once proud Scotland is loose the entitlement attitude the world doesn’t owe you a living your entitlement is someone else’s burden it take more than submitting a claim or a expenses form to actually create wealth, look what your beloved eu let happen to the really vulnerable in Greece
@@johnrea2115 you seem to be relying on uk estimates not a knowledge of our highly successful and diverse economy. Look it up on wikipedia and also calculate how much we will save by not having the encumerence of the costly imperial pretensions that the uk has.
Btw where will you keep your nukes? On the Thames?
Jullien: nukes would you accept euro nuked on the Clyde needed for their superpower aspirations
Financially: looking at a 13 billion black hole even with the Barnet formula, but then the nationalist or in Scotland’s case globalists have a cut and paste new labour policy of importing countless immigrants to exploit and finance the whole economy a slave market of sorts, that’s the brave future of fake Independence
What a shower those MP's look. And they are supposed to represent us - God help us !!
One True Brit and again mock all you like but they are smart - see not everyone has Brexit blinkers on. Your best bet is to back a second ref - finish them forever
They are representing us - the MPs who promised that leaving the EU would solve 'problems' lied. They never had any plan to leave the EU - be angry with them, they are the ones who let us all down and who have not done their jobs.
richard smith no - a general election will most likely deliver a hung parliament- back to square one.
sugarpuffbutty they are protecting us from the stupidity of leave. I care about our country but more about the people within it. We already have an explosion of people using food banks to survive and the yellowhammer report states that food and electricity prices will massively impact those on low incomes - Brexit is fucking stupid by the stupid!!
L B mate your talking absolute bull. Leave campaign could not even negotiate a plan to leave, let alone our future trade deals. Blame the Eu, god what a sad opinion.
I do wish they would stop showing the scene of BJ manspreading in a school room.
lol manspreading... what are you a feminist?
I don't! It shows him to be exactly as craven as he is ! He even feels it necessary to compete with kids ! And the kid showed him up proper ! Lol
@@user-hk8wz3pp3l What's wrong with being a feminist? When the world is a fairer place for women I will stop being a feminist love.
@@outlawJosieFox It's 2019 and being "liberal" or a "feminist" is somehow a derogatory term to many people, feels like we're going back to the 1950's
17.5 Million people IS NOT THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UK.
Yes it is, It's the majority of people who bothered to show up and vote. That's how democracy works... You just don't like it when it goes against your beliefs.
We the true brits back him all the way. You remainers started all this. You lost the vote and then crying like a bunch of baby's.
The problem is that the minority (such as yourself) can't accept the fact they are the minority and respect the views of the majority. Not a difficult concept to grasp is it???
Ask again for a general election and you will open up parliament again lol
Alexander The great, how many general elections will it take, to rid parliament of the deep state, and elect those willing to do the will of the people?
Grandpa Toms unfortunately I don’t think they will
The reason Labour doesn't is because even die-hard Labour supporters won't vote for them because of the feckless idiot in charge who loves terrorists and hates our soldiers.
Very sad when courts start getting into the business of the government. Reminds me of the states.
Not so. This is not America. Our courts are all about The law. If they say it's unlawful. It is.
Paul Robinson judges are still people. You cannot tell me all judges are free of biases.
Earthen Brown I would trust them to uphold the law and know right from wrong over Johnson and his apologists and sycophants!
What's sad is that it has to come to this. British politics has completely derailed.
@@hanskuijsten2380 its what happens when half the country gets targeted by propaganda n lies
Scotland said no. What don't the English not understand?
Scotland is not an independent Nation. Their votes count as part of larger union. They voted NO to Independence from that union!!!
Disgraceful reporting when the question of John Majors proroguing of Parliament from the expenses scandal was'nt asked about or mentioned..but what else can you expect from Ch 4
Just like #TrumpTheCorrupt, ol' Boris boy gets in there and starts fouling everything up because he thinks he and he alone knows best. I'm really curious to see how the Brits handle their Trump! This is getting good...
I'm loving watching this. It's nice having somebody else's government in the spotlight going crazy
If your saying that Johnson should abide by what Parliament says, shouldn’t Parliament abide by what the people say? And the people voted for Brexit.
3 years ago, additionally the referendum wasn't legally binding so parliament was under no obligation to comply with it.
What did the result of the referendum mean? Britain has voted to leave the European Union. I hate the term Brexit. It is serious that the politicians are ignoring the will of the people. Why accept a rotten deal to leave.
What did the result of the referendum mean? nothing, referendums are nod binding by any means by law
Voted to leave how though? I remember how all the benefits of the EU were going to be preserved if Leave won, and now apparently Leave was secretly campaigning for the UK to have the same fantastic trading relationship that Mauritania has. Everyone is acting like because Remain didn't win therefore everything and anything that isn't Remain has an equally strong mandate even though Brexiteers can't even agree on what they want.
@Frankly Frank Served her? By taking 100s of billions in money and opening the gates to millions of people to compete with the poorest people in our country?
@@cupguin Most of us now agree it would probably be best just to leave without a deal.... which is why the fifth column in parliament has blocked just that.... as they don't want to leave the EU, which flies in the face of the expressed wishes of the British people.
Frankly Frank no we jsut dont like having our laws superceded and dictated by EU unelected beaurocrats who havent worked a day in their miserable lives.
“Donnez-moi un break” 🤪 For a PM, BoJo is a good clown. Referenda are not legally binding, no more than an opinion poll and we’re governed by Acts of Parliament, not by opinion polls. 52% : 48% does not constitute a democratic mandate, it should be at least 2/3 for such a seismic change and it was ludicrous to reduce such a complex issue to a crude binary Yes /No decision. Brexit is undeliverable, it is wasting time and energy and compromising the dignity and credibility of Parliament. Revoke Article 50. Back to the drawing board.
From outside the UK; yours seems a very sensible reasoning
The "Nose and the Ears" don't have it,
The people want Parliament to end the circus and find a solution to the "Back Stop"
The 'Back stop' should be.... REUNITE IRELAND, but the Republican government don't want that. We're paying out countless amounts of dole money to the Republicans. That's why the Irish government doesn't want to reunite, as they would go broke within a year!
@@margaretcunningham9092If that's the case,
then there is no other alternative but to leave Brexit without a deal, or remain in the EU.
Boris can’t even hide a cheeky smile when he talks about the reasons for prorogation, hahahaha. What a character he is!
Didn't like the result of the first judge so just keep trying until we get the answer we want.... At least their disgusting behaviour is consistent.
Isn't the way we do things in this country precisely what you say you wish to protect by leaving the E.U.? Or was that just a load of codswallop?
They say that becase the advise is unlawful therefore the prerogation is unlawful. They do not justify this at all, and make the assumption that the power of prerogation stems from lawful advise to prerogue. The power of prerogation is absolute, notwithstanding any acts of parliament to the contrary. The power of prerogation does not stem from the advise, and therefore even in the case of wilful deceit the prerogation must stand. The only thing that hinder this power is an act of parliament such as was the case in the Miller case when it came to treaty making privleges of the crown.
Whether it be English courts or Scottish courts, they are all saying that Boris Johnson is guilty. What the English courts are saying is although he is guilty, due to a case about 150 years ago, they should not interfere in Parliament. There is no such case law in Scotland and therefore unlike their English colleagues, who also agree he is guilty, the Scottish courts can say he is guilty.
Shitpost.
😂. That’s how the remainers work.. they are relentless I’ll give them that. It is all in vein though..
BS, if the Queen gave assent its legal.
Jonathan Waggoner the queen has also given way to a law blocking no deal brexit. You still have the same view?
The Queen has no real power, she is not allowed to stand in the way when it comes to politics
We don't live under absolute Monarchy you gibbering imbecile.
No one is above the law
"Off with his head" perhaps
How is it that in a supposed democracy the prime minister has the power to ''suspend parliament''?
ross meroe : the only question that needs to be asked on democracy is: why are we still in Europe when the majority of people voted to get out ?
That last interview with Matt Lucas was very insightful
The spirit of Scotia reigns fearless and free 🏴
Thank you for saving us again Scotland!! We love you!!
How can anyone know for sure that all Leavers who voted were absolutely voting for a Brexit without a deal? It cannot be construed to be the "will of the people" to leave in a chaotic way, any more than it can be construed to say the Remainers voted to import fresh food from the EU regardless of five nuclear explosions occurring where the fresh food is grown.
No one in the Brexit leadership was selling Brexit to the voters using the kinds of problems known about now. That material point must be included in any discussion regarding what each citizen who voted was choosing. The Remainers had ample experience with the pros and cons of membership in the EU on which to base a communication to Parliament of their will. The leavers did not have a judgment based on the realities of a Brexit, deal or no deal. They can hardly be saying anything about their versions of a trade relationship when they use reasons such as "former glory" " take back control" or " we used to rule the world" as reasons they voted Leave.
In fact, the grousing about EU rules appears to be on the rulings over a possible national guard, or a possible joint response to refugees, rules about the status of chlorine sprayed chicken and the mismanaged austerity - none of which have a whole lot to do with a complex trade agreement.
Boris Johnson is electric with spending on the UK credit card, as Trump has done. The difference between the two is Trump is expecting to make money from the UK's unprotected economy and Boris is sitting on his hands while it happens.
Cyd Oman who cares leave means leave no matter what the consequences of you think leavers are going to accept being in Europe when we already won no delaying will make us change our mind to these traitors
Cyd Oman if the government isn’t allowed to bring the people’s vote for Brexit into reality, then the UK will truly no longer exist as any form of democracy. This is simply a battle between the majority of people that voted to leave the EU and the EU itself. If the EU wins, the EU wins, and that’s the end of the UK.
We will not be allowed to leave, which will just confirm my notion that your vote means nothing. The remainers have no idea what they are doing. Be it on their heads!
We know exactly what we are doing. All the leavers will have died of old age in 30 years.
@@jlscoyserney yourll be laughing no more when an unelected muslim majoroity takes over the running of the EU.
Is the UK Supreme court based in Scotland or England? Another point, this prorogation business, I had never heard of it until a few days ago but apparently it is common practice i.e. to suspend parliament for short periods. Do they prorogue their salaries too?
Well it was a Scottish judge that nailed count dankula.
Love you Scotland!! Please please please don't leave us alone on this island being ruled over by a cabal of Eton educated professional political operators ruling for their own economic advantage!!
@@outlawJosieFox finaly someone else that thinks and observes like me thank god now there are 2 of us
@@outlawJosieFox Or alternativly you can move up here and help us get independence then you dont have to worry about the UK Gov again
I have never seen so many remoaners in one place
Get used to it. Because you lot aren't going anywhere.
Hans Kuijsten 😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣when the uk leaves the eu will the remoaners leave the uk??
@@slotcarmad4370 🏴 Of course! 🏴
What a mess. But all the ceremonial aspects in the face of such disarray are definitely entertaining.
It'd be nice to see Scotland as an independent country.
You can shout and lie from the sidelines driving a red bus like a madman.
But once from he sidelines into the front benches, you can't fool anyone unpunished anymore. Especially The Crown.
So he fooled the queen then? She gave her consent?
14:00 Select committees say that Brexit will damage the British economy. What about the select committee that in 2007 said that mass immigration was of no economic interest to the majority of the existing population and was eroding their quality of life by unnecessarily increasing the population. That select committee was ignored and the result was the vote for Brexit.
I think we are all looking at the second Court of Session ruling wrong (don’t forget that this case has been dropped from the Court of Session once). I'm now under the belief that not only do the SNP expect to lose in the UK Supreme Court, I think that is actually the outcome they are looking for!
Before I get into why, some numbers.
2014 Scottish Independence referendum
Remain 2,001,926 55.30%
Leave 1,617,989 44.70%
Electorate: 4,283,392
Turnout: 84.59%
2016 eu referendum (Scottish result)
Remain 1,661,191 62.00%
Leave 1,018,322 38.00%
Electorate: 3,987,112
Turnout: 67.2%
Now with that in mind we look at the SNP, and in particular Ian Blackford’s rant in the HoC on Monday the 9th. He made it quite clear that that the SNP are quite willing to pull Scotland out of the United Kingdom and planting the seeds of the narrative that the Government is trying to silence Scotland, but there’s a problem with this threat. Were the SNP to kick off another referendum on Scottish independence it’ll boil down to a choice between the UK and the EU. With the crushing defeat in 2014, the voter turnout disparity and the ironic fact that the vote on independence would be between which union to stay in! Then the vote could very easily go either way, and the SNP know it.
So why do I think the SNP want the case to fail in the Supreme Court?
Well it’s my belief that this is all a bid to rile up hate and anger in Scotland against the English, with the aim of drawing more of the Scottish voters over to the SNP that wouldn't normally vote for them. Quite literally using manipulation to divide and conquer.
Bottom line. It's going to cost more to feed your kids very soon. Make a pantry and start stocking it. A run on the shops will make them resupply faster before the no deal exit..
Of course it's illegal. The UK is a parliamentary democracy. If it would have been legal to shut down parliament to prevent it from acting, then the UK wouldn't have been a parliamentary democracy, or, in general, a democracy.
Boris could of said to the queen I want to prorogue parliament to deliver brexit it still would not be illegal
actually it would be, but it would be a different illegality which may still come to fruition
Ciaran Jenkins is actually a leprechaun.
An act of parliament is not law, it's secondary legislation and needs the consent of the governed before being given the force of law. We do not consent.
When we finally leave 10 years from now
We will look back and laugh at how silly we were
To vote leave?
You only get to speak for yourself for you have no right to speak for any countries "we". And that is not rocket science.
paul hoskin utterly ridiculous place for this country to be in. Should have stuck that on the side of the bus... What an absolute joke this government is.
I agree but 10years is too long. Immigration is falling. Wages are above inflation. The cure is leaving the EU and SM and CU.
@@JamesMurphy1984 So run. And do a better job. Can you? If so prove it.
As an outsider it seems to me that Boris Johnson acts *exclusively* based on personal interests.
As a totally impartial third party I think he may just be the Churchill of our generation ;P
The Brexiteers have strategically & adroitly backed themselves into a corner.
The judge summed up what the Supreme Court may decide - that BJ can only exercise the discretionary powers - such as prorogation - if his government has a majority. It has not. Therefore unlawful.
If the EU is completely inflexible and has said its part then just vote on it and be done...oh wait you have already done that 3 times and that went so badly it broke some records. An extension is just a ploy. They are asking to be extended backwards onto a path well traveled. If there is no new deal than there is no path forward.
Exactly Sherlock . So after eliminating all the impossible things what does Sherlock do . Go with the possible . Rescind article 50 . Simples .
The UK is being inflexible (ostensibily) about the backstop they initially proported for. The EU is inflexible in removing it due to supporting the GFA and Ireland as one if its members. They have, however, told the UK they are open to resolutions that the UK is able to come up with (since it would be the UK putting up a border in Ireland). I saw ostensibly becuase really its that the members of the ERG (who voted 3 times against the withdrawal agreement you're referring to) want out before the EU tax avoidance directorate gets implemented in January.
@@brittanydawn2633 They could have just agreed on a time limit on the backstop and every one could have moved forward. I felt really bad for PM May. Looked like she really wanted to get something done.
@@socratesrising The backstop is a red herring to distract from the real reasons for avoiding further delays or even just a transition period under May's working agreement which would extend beyond January, meaning they would have to abide by the tax avoidance transparency measures. The backstop is to mask this, albeit at the cost of putting the GFA at risk. Agree though. May was not a member of the ERG but did try to keep her party together and keep everyone happy. Johnson repays this by removing the whip from 21 MPs from his party rather than attempt any kind of compromise and reconciliation.
If the UK and the EU are so at one with one another why can't a new deal be put forth in good faith? Why is it so hard to imagine both sides working it out after you part ways?
The will of the people has also been suspended.
I am glad that parliament has been suspended because I am tired of politicians working against the will of the people
Marjorie Rushie Like it or not, parliament expresses the will of the people on a day to day basis. That was decided some 400years ago. The fact that they are divided indicates that the people are divided. Most probably a new election will fail to produce a majority - again indicating a divided electorate.
A hairsplittingly thin majority in england and wales only of a misinformed voter block, to make the largest single constitutional chance in the last century.
9:03 'It wasn't The Press's finest hour, we may go there again, I hope not.' Lord Sumption must have been utterly brutal.
Scottish court decisions are not binding in England nor the whole of the UK. So no need to appeal
You have no idea how your judiciary works do you?
Quite correct as we both have different laws which we follow. So the SNP have tried to bullshit people asusual
Yellowhammer has been released tonight.
What about the traitors not honouring the will of the people bunch of dictators
"asking people every 10 minutes"? It's three years already.
BO-JO = Trump Make Your Country Great Again.
How long did you spend thinking that gem of wisdom up?
It shows nothing. The parliament will waste time appealling the decision. Theyll just ignore the scottish court, they have the english courts that ruled otherwise.
I suppose for just the next five minutes, Sturgeon doesn't wanbt Scotland to be independent, she'd rather have it in for poor old Boris. I don't think there's anything good on the box. I want to see all these clowns being bashed up with cricket bats. I'm a reasonable sort of person.
Go Jon Snow! Much better than Cathy Newman, who is incapable of listening to her interviewee.
Thanking the Scots right now 👌🏽
So judges can just decide on anything at anytime without being asked, I’ll wait for them to let me of with my parking fine !
The British have one of the world's oldest constitutional traditions. Just because its not written down doesn't mean there is no constitution.
Please, then tell me in detail all of those constitutional traditions. Please do not forget some, because then anybody will be able to claim whatever they want to be a constitutional tradition. There is a reason why the constitution is a written document in 99% of all countries in the world (except in the UK, Saudi Arabia, ...). By writing it down as 1 document, it could be read by anybody. Then, you could not easily lie to or trick people who know how to read a document with a clearly written procedures for the governments/parliament/head of state and citizens, procedures about referendums, successions, international treaties, environment, voting in parliament, voting and jobs of government, elections for the parliament or the head of state, ....
For many years England imposed "his democracy" on his neighbours with wars...Strange democracy.
Oh, and the written rights of the people, minorities, judges, workers, local regions, ...
Manuel Duarte Oh, c’mon, that’s how every emprire that ever existed has worked in the past (and to a lesser extent and more obscurely now). Now it’s money and power wars, but revealing such long gone past to make seem the present questionable is pointless
The lady is nuts. They haven't done anything prior to suspension of parliament either.
Judiciary and politics have always been separate this sets a dangerous *president.* Correction due to auto correct “precedent”
Precedent* not president
Isaac Khan thanks for pointing out the auto correct.
#ParliamentVsPeople
@Mäander That's less than 52% mate.
@Mäander It's pretty fascist to point out that the parliament is defying the government the ability to fulfil both it's own elected mandate AND the 2016 referendum result both? Beg your pardon but that takes some crazy mental gymnastics.
@Mäander I am saying that democracy only works with the consent of the losing side. Upon voting you're agreeing to honour the result. So "the people" decide the outcome via voting.
@Mäander I don't care about your value judgements, we don't share the same value judgements. If labour wins a general election, people don't say "but what about muh tories?!"
Democracy means "the thing that most people want, happens". Not, "everybody gets what they want". You need to find a dictatorship you can be in charge of, democracy isn't for you it seems.
some people might argue that nicola sturgeon being allowed to breath might be unlawful..
Scottish courts equate to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, that's why they took their appeal all the way to Scotland.
Johnson flits between being a weekly calamity and a daily one. The most useless and dangerous PM of modern times, if not of all time.
Sheep.
@@charlescasadei3045 Churchill was considered old fashioned, until the war came along requiring his talents. Otherwise he would not have been remembered as he is. He called for a United States Of Europe and in later life believed Britain should have been in it, as the Empire fell away
The Queen should sack the lot of them and get ministers that know what is going on in the real world!
Right, absolutely right. The know what it is if thing in Great Britain good on like this. They know what's going to happen if they don't do something about it fast. They know what they're going to face if they choose to take the wrong path that is known to be the land of forbidden. Even the Scottish, Northern Irish, and Irish Citizens know what political consequences UK is going to face if they prefer to be in the die trying involvement which considers them to be the worst country in Europe, the World, and the univers. Great Britain has to be in the request where they can make a comeback to Brussels with the EU. They've have been warned to improve this mater because this is no longer a game of cowardness. It's no longer a priority that can allow to have multiple excuses for the penalty of procrastination. Especially playing hard to get. This is not the option. No one is having it. No one. Especially not Brussels, Ireland, France, Germany, Denmark, Chezcnia, Poland, Spain, Portugal, Austria, Hungary, Finland, Greece, Italy, Croatia, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovenia, Latvia, Luxembourg, Estonia, Malta, Cyprus, Eastern Europe, and the rest of the world listen to this. The European Union of Federal National Agencies are not going to allow this to happen in the continuing interest of false independence in the country's legacy. The US is not accepting this offer to be the next event that can happen in the nearest future. The UN United Nations are also expecting the country to go back to the renegotiations with the Palerment. David Cameron, Tony Blair, Guy Verhofstadt, Nicola Sturgeon, Jean-Claude Juncker, Donald Tusk, David Sassoli, Nicolas Sarkozy, Emanuel Marcon, Angela Merkel, Ursula Von der Leyen, Giuseppe Conte
, Leo Varadkar, Michael D. Higgins, Federica Mogherini, the rest of the European Commission Leaders are expecting Britain to reunite the opportunity to reclaim the golden prize of becoming the European Member once again.
Nagel Farage is responsible for the (2016) EU withdrawment in expecting referendum of Brexit happen in the first place. While they know there's no reason for him to do that. Nobody likes him because of what he did in his attempt is wrong. He was doing a selfish event that is base on the negative effect. He's a traitor not the them. He made a choice of becoming a dictator of betrayal. The representatives of the European Parliament are the good members for the best opportunity to come. Including members of the European Union. Without Britain returning the EU it's going to be a death penalty and a outcast for the country. With the EU membership, everything is easier to get in touch. Everyone is save and the country is still alive.
This is why bring the serious member of the European Union is 100% Productive, Proactive, Responsible, Reasonable, Reliable, Brilliant, and Officiant for people in Europe, citizens, immigrants, foreigners, and travelers then countries that are not official members of the European Parliament. Which contains them to be Non EU Nationals for the World Trade Commission. Countries that are productive members of the EU are masters of the leadership that approves them to be part of the Federal National Commission. That's the golden power of Duelers and Insiders. Countries which are not part of the European Union are not just unacceptable member but more likely to become a student of the Palerment and followers for the individual event which is not good enough for them to come in. Even if they decide not to, it's more likely they're outsiders for the productive leadership. That's a platinum power of the pushovers in staying behind. That how it actually works.
They have always said, Scottish courts are separate from English and Welsh. And we don't take any laws from Scotland, because they have all their own laws. All they have done is, they found a very sympathetic judge allegedly. Who has made an interpretation favouring the more remain stance allegedly, but the week before, we had a court case and the court said that the Parliament or prime minister had the right to do it, because they would have been off on 5 weeks with their conferences anyway. It's like this week the TUC conference and then next week is the greens or the Liberal Democrats and then Labour and then the Conservatives and whoever next between UKIP or brexit parties. So I don't take much stock from that Scottish court case, but just from the English and Welsh case as we should.
Operation Yellowhammer: "Low-income groups will be disproportionately affected by any price rises in food and fuel."
Blimey. Some people will have to suck their gums to stay warm. Who would have guessed at that. I'll tell you: a lot of people who voted remain.
@M R
‘Yellow hammer’ classic Eu propaganda.
WORSE CASE SCENARIO.
Why aren’t you upset and crying about the preparations for full scale nuclear war ?
If you honestly believe the government doesn’t prepare for all known scenarios you’re a dunce.
@James Smith
😆
@Craig Johnson
Totally agree, on top of the social breakdown let’s not forget the ECB needed saving only a few years ago.
Shambles.
Yup. This has been said many times by many people for many years. Some don't want to listen :(
thought I heard 2 yes 2 judges said it was legal not 1 who thinks it wasn't
@Barry Stubbs
You did but the two are not reading from the pro Eu MSM script so are unimportant in the eyes of the deluded remoaner
Courts judge according to the law. There is no specific law dealing with the prorogation nor the PM’s power to bring it about. Therefore the courts cannot justifiably rule on this matter one way or another. Custom and tradition have no legal basis. Just as the PM’s power to call elections at his whim was severely curtailed in 2011, the present crisis would suggest that legally adopted parliamentary contraints are also needed re prorogation.
I've been having a look at what Americans think of what's going on in UK at the moment. They cannot believe this level of chaos is happening; they think we've elected BoJo cos we think The Don is "lonely and needs more friends"; they also think BoJo is a cheap imitation of The Don. I've got a suspicion that the rest of the world doesn't even care (or even know) about brexit.