The one word that can be used to describe the history of earths climate is changeable. The Carbon Cycle or mans impact on it, is not the main driving force. The one measurable variable linked to increases in carbon dioxide, is the increased greenness of the planet observed from space. This boost to plant growth will accelerate habitat renewal and heal our planet, not destroy it.
So other than that statement being just utter bullshit, there's more than just Carbon being created by humans that are driving climate change.. and yes, we are the primary driver of it
@@robulosity84 I'm not so sure Robert. Climate science is still in it's infancy, with numerous hypotheses but nothing approaching a true scientific theory. As all of the predictive models based on current hypotheses. Have failed to followed the measured changes in climatic variables. Hence they are flawed. Many learned scientists are of the opinion, that we as a species do not yet fully understand the intricacies and long term stressors' of earths climate. The vast majority of which are well outside of our control. I'll give you two examples that hopefully will stimulate critical thought. Firstly, the effect the recovery from the Younger Dryas event has had, is not fully understood. Which could account for arctic ice measurements being wildly different to those predicted by the models of man made climate change. There were similar events in the southern hemisphere that make interpretation very difficult. Lastly, the impact of plate tectonics on methane hydrate stability zones in the oceans and tundra. Are neither fully understood or included in climate models that I've ever seen. Those naturally occurring and randomly released greenhouse gas deposits. Have been forming, outgassing and reforming throughout the history of planet earth. Don't worry Robert, I'm not a climate change denier. Only a stickler for proper scientific practices and their separation from politics. After a lifetime spent in research, I postulate that it's just too early to predict the contribution of industrial impact on climate. Maybe in a thousand years! When we have had time to collect sufficient data and assess the implications of near earth objects. Solar activity, and other unknown phenomena that will be discovered. The one observation worthy of note, is the greening of the planet and the positive implication for habitat renewal. A purely observation based positive conclusion for a change. Plastics and the impact they are having on the biosphere. Is to my mind a far more worth while subject for a global research initiative. It is certainly a very clear and present danger to life on planet earth. I would much rather see time and money ploughed into that to find an urgent solution.
This needs more attention
😻♥️💖💞🙏👼🌻🌻💚💚 Love you Hyundai 💖💖💞💞 God Bless!
Really good 🖤🥺
✨💕💜
Tuyệt vời quá
The one word that can be used to describe the history of earths climate is changeable. The Carbon Cycle or mans impact on it, is not the main driving force. The one measurable variable linked to increases in carbon dioxide, is the increased greenness of the planet observed from space. This boost to plant growth will accelerate habitat renewal and heal our planet, not destroy it.
So other than that statement being just utter bullshit, there's more than just Carbon being created by humans that are driving climate change.. and yes, we are the primary driver of it
@@robulosity84 I'm not so sure Robert. Climate science is still in it's infancy, with numerous hypotheses but nothing approaching a true scientific theory. As all of the predictive models based on current hypotheses. Have failed to followed the measured changes in climatic variables. Hence they are flawed. Many learned scientists are of the opinion, that we as a species do not yet fully understand the intricacies and long term stressors' of earths climate. The vast majority of which are well outside of our control.
I'll give you two examples that hopefully will stimulate critical thought. Firstly, the effect the recovery from the Younger Dryas event has had, is not fully understood. Which could account for arctic ice measurements being wildly different to those predicted by the models of man made climate change. There were similar events in the southern hemisphere that make interpretation very difficult.
Lastly, the impact of plate tectonics on methane hydrate stability zones in the oceans and tundra. Are neither fully understood or included in climate models that I've ever seen. Those naturally occurring and randomly released greenhouse gas deposits. Have been forming, outgassing and reforming throughout the history of planet earth.
Don't worry Robert, I'm not a climate change denier. Only a stickler for proper scientific practices and their separation from politics. After a lifetime spent in research, I postulate that it's just too early to predict the contribution of industrial impact on climate. Maybe in a thousand years! When we have had time to collect sufficient data and assess the implications of near earth objects. Solar activity, and other unknown phenomena that will be discovered.
The one observation worthy of note, is the greening of the planet and the positive implication for habitat renewal. A purely observation based positive conclusion for a change.
Plastics and the impact they are having on the biosphere. Is to my mind a far more worth while subject for a global research initiative. It is certainly a very clear and present danger to life on planet earth. I would much rather see time and money ploughed into that to find an urgent solution.
Hello Hyundai