Massimo Vignelli and his 1972 NY Subway map

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12

  • @trainluvr
    @trainluvr 14 років тому +1

    No comments, hmm. The map is a masterpiece, though the trunk colors used today are sensible, but the bus transfer info bubbles are an abomination. If you compare the 1979 map to today's you can see a lot of progress, but it is quite busy as Massimo states.

  • @saginawdavis
    @saginawdavis 13 років тому +2

    @benfortney Exactly. Berlin's map is one of the most frightening things I've seen for two reasons:
    1. No geography whatsoever.
    2. You can only tell the name of a line by tracing it out to its terminal point. There's no legend for color codes,.

  • @alberoDiSpazio
    @alberoDiSpazio 6 років тому

    my hero. Him and Mondrian.

  • @lucasdimitri
    @lucasdimitri 13 років тому

    @Gondring We'll be happy to get the page you are talking about ;)

  • @AEMoreira81
    @AEMoreira81 13 років тому +1

    That map has returned...the MTA, as of today is using it now to explain planned service disruptions.

  • @alberoDiSpazio
    @alberoDiSpazio 6 років тому

    my hero.

  • @asia-88
    @asia-88 8 років тому +3

    A brilliant mind vs. fragmented minds. Who won ?

  • @europe_trains
    @europe_trains 4 роки тому

    Nice

  • @marty177
    @marty177 13 років тому

    The Sydney rail map has got basic direction. The western suburbs are on the left side of the map, the northern suburbs are at the top and so forth. The layout is the general layout of the city. I think that is enough for people.
    Does the Vignelli NYC map have at least that amount of geography?

  • @CMSINFAMOUS
    @CMSINFAMOUS 12 років тому

    This is history

  • @simonbnyc
    @simonbnyc 12 років тому +1

    Vignelli's map was so much easier to read and understand. The current map is cluttered and confusing with lines going all over the place. It's a design failure. People traveling underground don't need geography. It's irrelevant. Simplicity is the key.