i would rather say that sri lanka was a part of ravan's lanka, which could be a bigger island or a group of island, a part of which got sunk. because otherwise it would not match with current placement of rameshwaram temple, and the fact that the distance covered by lord hanuman was 100 yojan. which is he distance between India and srilanka coast.
The Sri Lanka of today was called Singhal as mentioned in Mahabharat. That is the original name of the Sri Lanka you see today. The Singhal nation in Mahabharat fought on the Kaurava side, and that is why there is a caste called Karava in Sri Lanka.
The Sri Lanka of today was called Singhal as mentioned in Mahabharat. That is the original name of the Sri Lanka you see today. The Singhal nation in Mahabharat fought on the Kaurava side, and that is why there is a caste called Karava in Sri Lanka.
@@theindestructible.yep. it was first called sinhaladweepa during Mahabharata and later called Ceylon by the Greeks and the brits. The fact is that it was never called Sri Lanka before it's independence. They probably did it to boost tourism.
Valmiki Ramayana Clearly explains that RAVANA LANKA used to be 1213 kms in length and 363.9 kms width. Maldives once stood as a high mountain, before getting submerged in the Indian Ocean. But the present-day Lanka is about 20 miles off the Indian coast at its nearest point.
Yep correct , half the people who argue are spoiled by Ramanand sagar's ramayan , Hanuman travelled 100 yojanas approx 800km to find sita maa , he flew with such a speed that ocean was split on his journey
The Sri Lanka of today was called Singhal as mentioned in Mahabharat. That is the original name of the Sri Lanka you see today. The Singhal nation in Mahabharat fought on the Kaurava side, and that is why there is a caste called Karava in Sri Lanka.
Sri Lankan Airlines Offers a Complete Tour Package called "RAMAYANA TRAILS" Tour includes all the places realated the Story of Ramayan... Thats such interesting... Sri Lanka conserved many places related to the story... Specially, Rawana Cave & Waterfall (Fall) Underground Blue Pond 🔥❤️ Worth watching that advertisement on Sri Lankan Airlines Channel 🤩❤️
I’m the Srilankan, SriLanka has sita hide place called sita elliya. And hanuman takes himalaya parts of including medicine Ayurvedic plants In SriLanka has Rumassala island same as himalya Ayurvedic plant includes. So srilanka ancient story explains that island is hanuman takes part of it.
Your srilanka is called ceylone or simhala dweep by historians...and only becuase of the tourism and to get cash from tourism ......govt started this sita and hanuman parts...but as per the valmiki ramayana, tha ravana lanka is completely different and dont know what happened to it.
@Thrillex4523that's not real ramsetu of ramayana,because its all are sands and rocks, real ramsetu was made of woods, bamboos and other natural things by Nal and Neel, and after saving Sita Mata Shri Rama destroyed that Ram Setu for protection of Lanka, also Lanka isn't Maldives...
I am also Sri Lankan and better informed. The Sri Lanka of today was called Singhal as mentioned in Mahabharat. That is the original name of the Sri Lanka you see today. The Singhal nation in Mahabharat fought on the Kaurava side, and that is why there is a caste called Karava in Sri Lanka.
During Tsunami back in 2004, ocean water withdraw from shore 1 to 2 km back. During that time people saw temple like ruins off of south beaches of Sri lanka.
00:02 Hanuman's journey to Lanka is interpreted differently by archaeologist Rupa Bhati. 00:49 Ravan's Lanka was east of Maldives on the Equator. 01:30 Earth's crust below the ocean is unusually thin 02:06 Evidence of islands submerging due to volcanic activity 02:47 Speculation on Sri Lanka as Ravan's Lanka 03:24 Sri Lanka's name given in 1972, possibly part of Ravana's Kingdom 03:58 Sri Lanka was referred to as Simal in the past 04:38 Sri Lanka is not Ravan's Lanka but possibly a submerged island with volcanic activity Crafted by Merlin AI.
Sir, Pampa is referred in Valmiki Ramayana. Actually Pampa River is in Kerala and there is also a place Rameshwaram in Kerala. Can you throw some light on this...
The river flowing through hampi was called as pampa back then … hence the name place came from pampi became hampi … hanuman birth place is close enough to hampi
Last thousand years 😂SL history has now has over 120000 years history quote Evidence of human colonization in Sri Lanka appears at the site of Balangoda. Balangoda Man arrived on the island about 125,000 years ago and has been identified as Mesolithic hunter-gatherers who lived in caves. Several of these caves, including the well-known Batadombalena and the Fa Hien Cave, have yielded many artifacts from these people, who are currently the first known inhabitants of the island.
What about the Rameshwaram temple location? It is said Ram Ji made the shivling before crossing the setu that was built. And it’s right near the Ram setu that’s there today?
In another interview Oak sir stated that, there is no mention of Rameshwaram in walmiki ramayana, current Ramsetu is a natural structure not a manmade structure. I think Prabhu Ram consecrated shivling in rameshwaram may be because that was the travel route to actual Lanka via Sighal dweep (current Srilanka)
It’s quite common for writers to use existing phenomena, real life personalities and even events woven into their fiction. There’s no definite evidence in Sri Lanka to support the existence of Ravana. It’s not found in our folklore even. The sites that are commonly shown as sites connected to Ramayana are of an earlier period of Buddhist civilisation, probably even earlier than Anuradhapura. For the existence of Ram and Sita temples, there may be simple explanations such as immigrants bringing their religions here and constructing temples to practice it. Best is to carbon date them to ascertain their antiquity. In any case, the version of Ramayana that you find in south of India and. North of Sri Lanka is not the same as the original that Valmiki wrote. It has been changed
All the relatives of Ravan died in battle, except Vibhishan. Vibhishan lived like a Vaishnava. The present day population of Sri Lanka has 3 major race: 1. The indegenous inhabitants of Lanka ( The children of Vibhishan ). 2. Buddhist preachers who migrated to Sri Lanka from Odisha or Bengal. 3. The Tamil people who migrated to Sri Lanka during the Chola period.
buddhists preachers are not who migrated to lanka sinhalese race started by west bengal genes mixed with local indigenous inhabitants. they were animists or hindus for years after many years , ashoka s son gave buddhism to sinhalese , until then , sinhalese were hindus so who came to lanka was hindus not buddhists.
yes tamils came to sri lanka with cholas in 997 AD (after 1700 years of arrival of sinhalese,)then chola s couldnt ever capture whole island of lanka bcz of strong sinhalese kingdoms, bcz of sinhalese resistence cholas couldnt even stay in lanka for at least 80 years, but tamil population was stayed there and there were significant tamil population enough in lanka to form JAFFNA KINGDOM in 1215 AD (within 200 years of tamils arrival to lanka)
but they came from north india , so they can be buddhists too, bcz north india was buddhist that time, according to sri lankan books , (may be these can be just myths)buddha have told to god shakra to protect vijaya s voyage to lanka bcz sinhalese and sri lanka will be the only place where buddhism will be alive for 5000 years and sinhalese and lanka will be commited to buddhas dharma marga ,I m just saying what I heard and read as a kid when we see the times , vijaya s time and buddha s time are also almost same timeline and sinhalese and sri lanka sacrificed so much already for buddhism and simply its a joke buddhism without lanka so I think may be those things can be true...
sinhalese and sri lanka did these 1- written down pali tripitaka on books to protect it during a 6 year famine called baminithiya saaya( baminithiya sagathaya)thats how pali tripitaka was protected to the future 2- originating THERAVADA tradition 3- spread it to thailand myanmar and cambodia(sinhalese call it dharma doota seva) 4- protecting bodhgaya for future by srimath anagarika dharmapala (a sinhalese lankan) 5- he also founded mahabodhi society still active in india and lanka 6- making and designing global buddhist flag by lanka 7- giving protection for world oldest human planted tree. a branch of original india bodhi tree 8- first country who spread buddhism to europe by founding pali text society 9- did pancha maha vada (5 great debates) with brits xians which drag attention of europe to buddhism which lead sir henry steel aulcutt and blawatski to come to lanka 10- modern mahameuna monasteries do dharma doota seva s world wide
If srilanka is not Ravans Lanka lot of questions will be unanswered!!! Ni wer eliya is Ashoka vana where seetha was kept captive, the Rama bodha where Ramas forces were aligned. The aginipravesha village where even today the tribals take an oath!!! So many points to ponder!
Your question 1 Who built Sigiriya Ravana or Kashyapa? Answer from Google 😎 Kashyapa is credited with the construction of the Sigiriya citadel and the surrounding city😊 🚩jai maharishi kashyap 🚩
Well. I'm a Sri Lankan, and we believe sigirya was king Ravana's kingdom. King Kashyapa has lived in Sigiriya just for a short period. After calculating the time it's impossible to believe he build the whole sigirya in a such a short period. And there are so many evidence that can prove Sigirya used to be kind Ravana's palace. But still we haven't discovered 100% accurately that sigirya is Kind Ravana's palace. That's why you found the answer as kind Kashyapa on Google. Trust me cuz I'm a Sri Lankan. We hope to reveal this truth to the world soon . Paradise of Asia ❤SL
@@minkdiscoveryI’m Sri Lankan too. There are no archaeological evidences which prove it’s built by Ravana but many evidences suggesting it was built by King Kashyapa. Ravana is a mythical story at that time. Just like Harry Potter.
Ravaans lanka is Sri Lanka that is no doubt but Maldives was also a part of raavans kingdom it can happen where Ravaan frequently visits and established many things. But it can happen Raavan born in Maldives and then settle in lanka . He did not separate it from his kingdom and it might be his financial capital. These things can happen. But lanka war happened in Sri Lanka.
The Ramayana, one of the two major Sanskrit epics of ancient Indian literature, has been rewritten numerous times over the years. While most people are familiar with Valmiki's / Kampa's Ramayana, countless more versions tell the story from distinct cultural, regional, and religious perspectives.
some people can give opinions in their point of view. But they are not always right. Sri Lanka has so many places and historical evidence which can prove Ravana was a ruler of this country. And he says Sinhala Deepa was the name not Lanka. Guys Sri Lanka has been called by so many names at the same time. we were called as Lanka and after Britian's came here, they changed the name to Ceylon. What we did was after we got the freedom we got our old name. the thing is some young Indians questioning Ramayana and most of them are not agreeing what Rama did with Seetha when she return. talking about Ravana and his power, his skill is surprisingly increasing among Indians. And this guy would not like to give that identity to Sri Lanka just because Sri Lanka is such a small country. he doesn't want to say that Ravana came from such a small country and did all that damage to them that going to talk about thousands of years. and he doesn't want name any other country as a Ravana's Lanka and just say it's a Maldives Island which we can't see now. Are u serious? the thing is they want to ignore all the ancient books and places and evidence in both countries just to save their history and pride.
@@sainirup8079 nope it is not. We are different from u guys in every possible way. We have our own proud history. Indians always try to point out that they are the best among all the countries. that's ok. but do not try to put your hands into other countries.
@@fromheaven8157 Yes, the name Sri Lanka was officially given as the name to India's neighbouring country only in 1972, by changing it from Ceylon that how it was called by the British, and prior to receiving independence in 1948 it was called British Ceylon. In 1972, the country became a republic within the Commonwealth, and its name was changed to Sri Lanka. Prior to that until 1972 it was Dominion of Ceylon and had a Governor-General who represented the British Monarch (Queen or King) just like it is today with Canada, Australia and New Zealand. In the ancient times Sri Lanka was called by many other names other than Ceylon and among them are Seilan, Serendib (Called by Arabs), Simhaladvipa, Tambapanni, Taprobane (Called by Greeks). Unfortunately there are a few in Sri Lanka are trying to distort history by saying that Sri Lanka is Ravana's Lanka that is mentioned in the Ramayana Indian Epic. These few people in as you mentioned to get cash from tourism and attract Indian tourists even falsely claim that the Sigiriya World Heritage Site was Ravana's palace. Sigiriya has nothing to do with Ravana mentioned in the Ramayanaya. There is archealogical and historical artifact evidence that Sigiriya was built by the Sri Lankan king Kashyapa I of Anuradhapura (of the Kingdom of Anuradhapura in Sri Lanka), Cuurently it is considered that the Sigiriya Rock World Heritage Site built by king Kashyapa I of Anuradhapura was used as a Royal Pleasure Garden. Based on Sri Lankan archealogical findings Ravana's Lanka is completely different that the currently known country of Sri Lanka. Dr Senarath Dissanayake who served as the Director General of the Department of Archeology has spoken a lot about the lie of trying to claim that Ravana mentioned in the Ramayana Epic lived in Sri Lanka, and one can fine several discussions where he says about it can be found in videos on UA-cam (like the one that has the title "රාවණා තනිකරම බොරුවක් - පුරාවිද්යා අධ්යක්ෂ ඡනරාල් මහාචාර්ය සෙනරත් දිසානායක | History Special EP"). Even Ellawala Medhananda Thero (එල්ලාවල මේධානන්ද) who is a Sri Lankan Buddhist monk and an academic scholar has spoken about the false claim that some people claim Ravana lived in Sri Lanka (one can find the video titiled "රාවණාගේ ඇත්ත නැත්ත" and "රාවණාගේ ඇත්ත නැත්ත | Story of Ravana | එල්ලාවල මේධානන්ද හිමි | Ellawala Medhananda Thero").
@@fromheaven8157 Ellawala Medhananda Thero from Sri Lanka explains about the words Seetha Eliya - means සීත එලිය (Seetha means cold) , Ravana - means නාද කරන්නා (i.e. one who makes a noise), Seethawaka - සීත වක (Seetha means cold) all these names have nothing to do with Ravana or Seetha that is mentioned in the Indian Ramayana Epic.
If ram sethu is not the one near rameswaram, then where ram worshiped shiv before crossing for Lanka? Makes no sense that he worshipped shivji at rameswaram and walk all the way to kanyakumari and build a sethu for 100s of kilometers in open sea. I don't think so. If current Sri lanka was refered as sinhala dweep and not Lanka, may be it was close to Srilanka as an island. May be a tiny island which is now submerged.
Sri Lankan here: Sri Lanka was called Sinhapura by foreigners only after the arrival of Sinhalese prince Vijaya 2567 years ago. Sri Lanka was called Lanka in Sinhalese before 1972 and the prefix *Sri* was given to Lanka only in 1972 following the party name of then ruling party, which was called "Sri Lanka Freedom Party".
This hypothesis can be totally wrong. If Srilanka is not actual ravan's lanka, it will defeat the several myths and legenda surrounding the temple nomenclature in Tamil Nadu. For example , the 'Ramar paadham - Rama's foot' in Kodikkarai , TN - Intitally Ram thought, this is the best place to cross to Srilanka, before going to Dhanush Koti. The several temples near rameshwaram - which talks about Ram's legend. All will go for a toss , if Srilanka is actually not Ravana's lanka. Even from a geological point of view ,the presence of Coral reefs and floating rocks will further defeat the argument.
Please visit the SriLanka, SriLanka has sita hide place ,,in cave area it is called Sita eliya. And Hanuman takes himalaya parts , and that parts have Ayurvedic medicine, same Ayurvedic medicines plant s including place called ‘Rumassala’ Island Sri Lanka. Another ancient place has ravana Lives and lay’s down place (sleeping place) called Yahangala, Ravana Ella, Ravana Lena etc. if you visit the SriLanka. You can see your own eyes and believe that. Not only the comment.
@@NadeeDil-v4u Ellawala Medhananda Thero from Sri Lanka explains about the words Seetha Eliya - means සීත එලිය (Seetha means cold) , Ravana - means නාද කරන්නා (i.e. one who makes a noise/sound), Seethawaka - සීත වක (Seetha means cold) all these names have nothing to do with Ravana or Seetha that is mentioned in the Indian Ramayana Epic.
soo what? sri lanka is at the east of maldives😂, and as he says sri lanka name was given in 1972 , bcz brits changed its name as ceylon ,even tho sri part wasnt before , the island was called as LANKADWEEPA (dweepa meens island in sinhalese) in sri lankan ancient books and rock tablets(shila lekhana in sinhala language) brits came and named maldives and sri lanka and made a new ruling area called british ceylon as brits come and named ban -pak-in-myanmar all as one british raj what sri lanka did in 1972 was recognice their old country name as their official name again by removing brits gave one imagine india was once bharat , brits named it as india , but india kept it even after independence what sri lank did was , sri lanka once was lankadweepa , brits named it ceylon, but sri lanka didnt kept it and changed their name back to their previous one adding SRI part to begining
Yes sri lanka was identified as lankadweepa , sinhaladweepa ,heladweepa ,not time to time , AT THE SAME TIME , as synonyms .☺️. And In sinhala language Ra means sun 🌞 .(even the god of sun in egypt also called RA as same as in sinhala ). Vana is comming from VARNA .means caste in sinhala (also in my indian language , varna is use to call castes)...so RAVANA means the sun caste in sinhalese.. Its hillarious to see dravidian tamils always try to claim ravana as their tamil 😂😂😂
@@Togetherwego12 actually, Spoken sinhala = IRA Formal sinhala = SURYA there other bunch of synonyms but won't put here as they don't make any difference.. It's not Ra in anywhere.. Ira most probably from old sinhala(prakrit) or a thathbhava word from sanskrit Surya..😊
@@ChannaJayawardhana-h1oIm a sinhalese..by the way in Sinhala , sun was called as RA in original form.(what we use now is simple modern sinhala.) 2) And varna is use to call kula (castes)...its even unbeievable to say sinhalese like you dont know VARNA is use to call castes in sinhala language 😂😂😂.. Have you ever heard of varnabeda jaathi beda words?.. Here varnabeda was meant caste problems....color problems never had in sri lanka in past.but caste problems were 😂thats what varna beda meant If you ever went to sunday dhamma school in 🇱🇰 you would have definitly know that the sinhalese text books have " CHATHURVARNA" as a lesson.😂in there chathurvarna in sinhalese means also 4 castes.we learn them as kshathriya, brahmana , waishya , shudra in 🇱🇰 වර්ණ- colors වර්න - caste Pls at least ask from your grand parents .they wil say you.sad to see sinhalese loosing the knowledge of their own language 😢
@@ChannaJayawardhana-h1o dont argue with me Im not a sinhalese.I say what I know.but I dont knoe much about your language to argue with you.but I can confirm sihalese word varna = caste too
Sigiriya had been occupied by WAISRAVANA !!! His father was WISHRAWAS SAGE who was one of the SAPTA RHISHIS who composed VEDA VERSES @ about 2 5 0 0 B.C. !!!
I think this refers to SiwHelaDweepa not SinhalaDweepa. Siw (means 04) hela Dweepa consists of Jabu dweepa, Lanka dweepa, Kuru dweepa and Giri dweepa. Lanka Dweepa was located in east of Sri Lanka.
Ancient time, Lanka was the capital city and it was called Lanka Pura. Sihaladveepa, Hela diva, Rathnadeepa were some names called Sri Lanka in the ancient time. Lanka pura was huge city with Golden palaces and serene natural waterfalls. Rawans Lanka means the main city of the country. Not the entire country. Even in resent history, Queen Kuweni helped Wijaya to concurred the country by assessing her uncles and Yakkha leaders who gathered in Lankapura for celebration... So Lanka or Lankapura was the ancient capital of Sihaladveepa.
havent you guys heard about " kumari kandam " may be that could explain the whole disappearance of Ravans lanka. A bigger peice of the current sri lanka would have just submerged in to the sea.
Submerged port near puducherry was also found roughly few years back around 10 km and 3km wide which might co relate with kumari kandam , also zealandia which again talks about the submerged portions of new zealand.. correct me if I am wrong
As per valmiki Ramayana Ravana lanka is 100 yojanas distance means 1213 KMs on south west. If you take direction and distance Ravan Lanka is located around Maldeves. Please note that sri Lanka is only 50 KMs away from Dhanushkoti. More over it is on south east .
Sri Lanka was part of South India during Tetra Yuga. Nobody needed to build a bridge to go to that place. Ram Setu was formed by tectonic movements and sea levels changes during the last deglaciation period.
this is one of the most exciting subjects I have come across in a long time. archeo astronomy and all that stuff that fixes the time and events. Really mind blowing info. This is real knowledge that the newer generations need to know. \
Wow. If this is true and gets known to many people, it's really going to be a big blow to the society that has been believing in certain things for generations.
Yo bro, at the time of ravana, the sri lanka island was a part of the big island that was lanka, and it might be that sri lanka might have been a mountain types hence the ram setu was made to go to sri lanka then it connected to lanka thru big island because that time sea levels were down, very down. eg. newzeland, has a massive island submerged in sea, and new zeland was a mountain type hence the part that is now new zeland only the top is avaliable, rest is submerged. like wise lanka, sri lanka
Please highlight the facts about Ram setu.... actually the Valmiki Ramayana says that the setu formed was 100 yojana in length, and the distance between india and sri lanka is not that long, and when i came to know this thought, it created some doubts to my mind, but this video clears my doubts, however if you can give some highlights on particularly the ram setu, i would be greatfull. Thanks
The Rama Setu, Bhagwan Rama's bridge is specifically mentioned in Ramayana, Yuddha kanda, Chapter 22, text 76, to be 100 yojanas (1287 kms) long and 10 yojanas (128 kms) wide and was built in just 5 days. Presently, the Rama Setu from Dhanushkoti in India to Talai Mannar in Sri Lanka is only 48 kms long. This apparent and huge difference in the distance has led many scholars to propose that Lanka of the Ramayana may be a different place than present day Sri Lanka.Actually, the difference in distance can very easily be reconciled by understanding the principle of yuga bheda and kala bheda, differences that occur in material manifestations by the influence of time and the changing millenniums. Here are a few examples: It is clearly mentioned in the Srimad Bhagavatam 10.52.2 that when Muchukunda, who had been in deep slumber since the satya yuga, woke up in Dwapara yuga, he noticed that the size of all the human beings, animals, trees and plants was severely reduced (samviksya ksullakan martyan pasun virud-vanaspatin). In Srimad Bhagavatam 10.52.12, when Jarasandha was chasing Krishna and Balarama, They climbed a mountain named Pravarshana. Jarasandha set fire around the mountain and Krishna and Balarama jumped from the mountaintop from a height of eleven yojanas!!! (88 miles or 142 kms). The Pravarshana Mountain, which probably may not be the highest mountain in Dwapara yuga (as the Himalayas may have been the highest), located somewhere in North or Central India, is mentioned to be 142 kms high. The tallest mountain in Kali yuga according to modern scientists is Mount Everest, which is only 8.848 kms, or less than 9 kms (not even 1 yojana). In Ramayana also, there is a description of a mountain 100 yojanas in height (800 miles or 1288 kms). Even if it may be argued that the mountain might be submerged in the sea, scientists say that the deepest point in the sea is the Challenger deep in the Mariana Trench in the Pacific Ocean, and it is 10.994 kms deep (again less than 1 yojana). Thus in kali yuga, there is no mountain more than 1 yojana in height whereas in Treta yuga, we see mountains over 100 yojanas in height. Even at the end of Dvapara yuga and beginning of Kali yuga, we see mountains 11 yojanas high. There are innumerable examples of geographical descriptions in the Vedic scriptures which are incomprehensible to the tiny brains of Kali yuga. The faithless outrightly reject these descriptions and brand the scriptures to be mythology, legends or epics. Those with some faith try to adjust these with some interpretation or try to connect with some scientific explanation as if Science is of absolute credibility.
This guy really crazy, Ravan wasn't live in a volcano country. still have evidence that can be proof Ravan lived in Sri Lanka. I heard this new things recently.
You konw a thing the story its said Lanka of ravan was big city and it has Walls this Sri Lanka we are seeing is not real it got its name in morden time and it said it had a big areas he must also be correct go study history broo 😂
@@gisha.p9527both countires have their own history. So Sri lanka has its own history. Dont point anything according your history, because we have same thing for indian history which is different for what you know. But we dont care and we dont say this and that. Respect other countries too. Keep your history only for your country. And we will do the same. Peace
Present Srilanka can’t be Ravana’s Lanka. When Vanaras were debating who can cross the ocean to reach Lanka the distance mentioned was 100 yojanas. One yojana is 8 miles. This means present Srilanka is not Ravana’s Lanka as the distance from Rameshvaram (close to which is the Gandhamadana mountain from which Hanuman Ji leaped to reach banks) to Srilanka today is about 30 miles. One cannot rule out catastrophic events causing tectonic shifts in landmass bringing lanka closer to India.
Krsna explains in Bhagavad-gita 8.4 "Physical nature is known to be endlessly mutable." Hence it is not unreasonable to infer that the sea level would also be subjected to periods of rising and falling throughout the history of the material creation including the time during and after the Ramayana." kindly refer the Srimad Bhagavatam (especially 3rd Canto) and the puranas which give exact descriptions of all ages right from the beginning of creation and even of the future ages and even of what is beyond the domain of Time, Kala.If anyone who objects must in turn be able to give a credible answer to the question of why "Sri Lanka-Ceylon" is not found where the sastras say Lanka should be? At least 100 yojanas (1287 km) away, on or near the equator, and at the meridian passing through Avanti. What I have shown closely agrees with sastra but the location of modern "Sri Lanka-Ceylon" does not." If the same distance has remained from Treta yuga, then you should also be able to show the mountains from Ramayana which are 1287 kms high or at least 2 yojanas high that Lanka is on the same meridian.
@@ravindurajapakse7270 ya I saw on Google. It's said that at gokarna in Karnataka, lord Ganesha intercepted Ravan. And the shivlinga is in a temple here
Who built Ram Setu We have places called Sita Eliya where Sita Devi was hidden Mountain of herbs from the Himalayas dropped by Lord Hanuman Please don't twist ancient history according to your whims and fancies Pardon me according to you Ramayana is a lie I need a reply to my comment
Let me give you the full story of fraud Nilesh Oak. He came up with a fraud date for Ramayana which is 12K BCE. He then realised that at that time (12K BCE), sea water level was that low that a bridge to Sri Lanka was not needed. Bhagwan Rama can just walk to Lanka, no need Rama Setu. His ego did not allow him to admit that he's wrong. So, he did the next best thing, tell lies to cover up the original mistake. So, he comes out with first lie, which is Sri Lanka is not Ravana's Lanka, it is lost in Indian ocean. Then, 2nd lie, Rama setu is a replica, the real Nala Setu is lost in Indian Ocean. 3rd lie, Vibishana has died. Vibishana that met Sahadeva during Mahabharata is some other Vibishana, not Ravana's brother. He ignores the fact that Vibishana is a chiranjeevi (immortal). I can give you a list of many more of his fraud. Ramayana is real, people like this fraud here is the ones that bastardise Itihasa for personal gains. That should tell you the quality of this podcast. Ranveer is know as pseudoscience mascot of India for a reason.
Ellawala Medhananda Thero from Sri Lanka explains about the words Seetha Eliya - means සීත එලිය (Seetha means cold) , Ravana - means නාද කරන්නා (i.e. one who makes a noise), Seethawaka - සීත වක (Seetha means cold) all these names have nothing to do with Ravana or Seetha that is mentioned in the Indian Ramayana Epic.
How could you say Sri Lanka is where longitude and latitude intersect ? Null Island near Gulf of guinea is (0,0). He is neither archeologist nor a geologist. May be a conspiracy theorist.
Many people just watch tv serial they didn't read Valmiki Ramayan or ved vyasa Mahabharat. That's why they don't know that this is not the original sri Lanka that is mentioned in Ramayan
Dear All, please dont believe Archeogists who have distorted history in all means. Archeology its self is an aspect of colonial beuracracy in modern times. If you want to who you are, where you are from and your history, go back in time. Push yourself to record your own history of your grandparents and beyond till it all connects. What is not printed is written, what is not written is carved and the truth is carved on stone. India was not india when this all happened, Bharath was not Bharath when this all happened. And Sri Lanka wasnt Sri Lanka when this all happened. Modern day Sri Lanka has carved history for more than 125000 years. The well kept secret of modern time. The great city of Atlantis, known as Atalankawa. Sri Lanka was always known as a Dweepa and every 5000 years during several Buddhas' and Rawanas' times it was known as Ojadweepa, Mandadweepa, Waradweepà & now Lankadweepa. Remember that Rawana is a lineage and a glorious position not a King. There were several sakwithi names as Ravanas Maha Tharu, Maha Bali, Maha Manu, Maha Siva, Maha Ravulu. In the story of Ramayana its one of these Ravanas who dealt with and definitely not the one Valmiki wrote of. Rama and Ravanas are all of one kingdom its all one but unfortunately modern India looks for its glory from distorted history. History will be written where the global geopolitical power is formed from. So be it. But remember Truth will win. We from Lanka are the sons of light, the Ravanas the greatest of Asuras who only adore the Sun, Moon and the Dharma. To sum up, dont believe what's written trust what is carved. Read, see and realise and you will see everything clear. Just an advice; least from this year stop burning our king (Ravanadhahan), stop celebrating cremation of our princes Holika (holi festival) & finally stop celebrating the burn of the Lanka (Deepawali) Its a pity to note a country's national festivals revolve upon destruction of a great civilization. In relation to this video , ive got nothing much to say. Words are spoken. Just beware of Karma.
There are many places in Sri Lanka associated with Ravana, such as the Ella Caves, Ravana Falls, Sigiriya (Ravana's palace), Kelaniya Temple (dedicated to Lord Vibhishana), Thotupola Mountain (believed to be a landing site for Ravana's flying machine), Ritigala mountain, Roomassala mountain, and the Seetha Amman Temple in Nuwara Eliya, etc... However, Sri Lankans do not worship Ravana. Instead, they primarily follow Buddhism and venerate the Buddha, along with some Hindu/Buddhist deities. The Sinhalese people, who make up 75% of Sri Lanka's population, are believed to have ancestral connections with the people of Odisha and West Bengal in India. Thousands of royal families migrated to Sri Lanka around 2,500 years ago and integrated with the local communities, including those associated with Ravana's legacy. The Sinhalese language, which is derived from Sanskrit, shares similarities with the language spoken in Odisha. The Sinhalese adopted Buddhism and various cultural elements from India during the rule of Emperor Ashoka.
The volcano near Indonesia is called krakatova. It happened some 200 to 300 years ago and Dutch record is there. But still the volcano is there standing outside ocean. There is no such thing east of Maldives.
Doctor's differ. So that may be or may not be ; still we believe in scriptures and histories although these are the rumours either that we heard in our ears or read in books. But we get some teachings and morals out of Ramayan. We have no practical view whether Ravana's LANKA was Shrilanka or Singhal. However we thank very much cordially Mr. Ranveer alias TRS for his sincere effort to let the message to reach billions of Global inhabitants consequently. Best wishes to TRS CLIPS. 👍🏼❤👍🏼
Dude Ramayana and Mahabharata is just a novels like Harry Potter and this stupid politician fooling people for their political gain by saying those novels are true😂😂
All Sinhalese know that majority of the island is sunk. Rawana city is sunk. The Maldives are the remnants of mountains. This guy needs to visit the island and see how much of the Sinhalese traditions and culture are involved with Rawana. Come visit and see his martial arts, medical practices, and even places throughout, baring his name. Simply put, where did you find this guy 😆 Although yes, correct name before Sri Lanka was Sinhaladip. Think Samudragupta inscription says the same 👍🏽😮
So you agree Sri Lanka wasn't called Lanka back then ? Then Nilesh is right about SL not being Ravana's Lanka. Also the 100 yojana distance between Bharat & Lanka mentioned in Ramayan is not existing between India & SL.
Sri Lanka is actually not the original name of what we today call Sri Lanka. Seriously go and read the Mahabharata. It clearly calls Sri Lanka "Simhaladvipa". This who "Sri Lanka" business is new historically speaking.
It is reality cause it is mentioned in Valmiki Ramayana that ravana's Lanka is situated at south east of kanyakumari and srilanka is situated at south west so according to that Srilanka is not actual Lanka@@dcpage3422
Yes Absolutely what Nilesh oak sir Said is True 💯. We have to dig deep to know what is real and what is fake. Sinhala dweepa(Srilanka) is not Ravana Lanka. And the Present structure between Bhārat and Simhala dweepa is not Real Rāma Sethu these are facts as per Vālmiki Rāmāyana, Padma Mahapurana. This present structure is only 30-40km long. 100yojanas ≠ 40km. 1yojana = 13km approximately. So 1300km is 100yojanas. Where is the 1300km between Bhārat and Simhala dweepa?? You might say Simhala might be way more far away once upon a time. No! Even in Continental drifting, both Bhārat and Simhala dweepa travelled together with same distance. Both are not in different tectonic plates, both lies on the same Indian tectonic plate. In Padma Mahapurana it's clearly mentioned that Ramasethu was destroyed by Sri Rama himself for Vibhishana. This is truth. I know many Hindus still believe that present structure as Ramasethu But it's fake.
@@bhavishdhankar1943 It's not like that. Vibhishana And his race was Rakshasa right. They are not humans. So he don't want Upcoming puny human generations entering Lanka and his kingdom.
There were 3 main tribes in Sri Lanka namely Yaksha, Naga and Deva (01) Yaksha - Lankapura,Sirisavatthu. (02) Naga - Kelaniya,Nagadeepa. (04) Deva - Sabaragamuva,Kataragama Prehistoric and Evidence that the above 3 tribes lived in our country Archaeologist Mr. Raj Somadeva has said through UA-cam media and it is also mentioned that people lived in our country in the Mahavamsa.
Ramayana is mythical yet repetitive story which existed in every society in many forms. Then, why does it matter, where is lanka. It's just a debate of fools.😂
Lol The Comment Section Is Just Soo Pathetic 😂...Srilankan Sinhalese Are Getting Triggered By Knowing The Fact That Srilanka Isn't Ravan's Kingdom lololololl 😂
i would rather say that sri lanka was a part of ravan's lanka, which could be a bigger island or a group of island, a part of which got sunk. because otherwise it would not match with current placement of rameshwaram temple, and the fact that the distance covered by lord hanuman was 100 yojan. which is he distance between India and srilanka coast.
No geological record for such a deluge
I agree ❤ and it is mentioned in old tamil sangam lit.
srilanka wouldnt be a island back then
In ancient scriptures srilanka s called as SINHALA DWEEPA, but later how it b came sri Lanka 😢
The Sri Lanka of today was called Singhal as mentioned in Mahabharat. That is the original name of the Sri Lanka you see today. The Singhal nation in Mahabharat fought on the Kaurava side, and that is why there is a caste called Karava in Sri Lanka.
The Sri Lanka of today was called Singhal as mentioned in Mahabharat. That is the original name of the Sri Lanka you see today. The Singhal nation in Mahabharat fought on the Kaurava side, and that is why there is a caste called Karava in Sri Lanka.
yep they live in down south of my country.
Also called Ceylon before but what do you call it now ? Tell that first
@@theindestructible.yep. it was first called sinhaladweepa during Mahabharata and later called Ceylon by the Greeks and the brits. The fact is that it was never called Sri Lanka before it's independence. They probably did it to boost tourism.
Srilanka is name in 1940s 🤣 only Tamils have there own name before Sinhala arrivals to Lanka it’s called ilangai ,eelam 🗿
That’s right Singhala Dweepa, Hela Dweepa (Eelam in Tamil) is the original name !! Sri Lanka is modern invention by Bandaranayake’s
Valmiki Ramayana Clearly explains that RAVANA LANKA used to be 1213 kms in length and 363.9 kms width. Maldives once stood as a high mountain, before getting submerged in the Indian Ocean. But the present-day Lanka is about 20 miles off the Indian coast at its nearest point.
Yep correct , half the people who argue are spoiled by Ramanand sagar's ramayan , Hanuman travelled 100 yojanas approx 800km to find sita maa , he flew with such a speed that ocean was split on his journey
The Sri Lanka of today was called Singhal as mentioned in Mahabharat. That is the original name of the Sri Lanka you see today. The Singhal nation in Mahabharat fought on the Kaurava side, and that is why there is a caste called Karava in Sri Lanka.
Check whether (Nagappattinam) Ramasethu to SriLanka Rumassala Island distance is 1264Km
@@MAYUR600🎉🎉😂
@@MAYUR600 Ramanand Sagar had made Ramayan majorly on the basis of Ram Charit Manas, not on Valmiki Ramayan.
Sri Lankan Airlines Offers a Complete Tour Package called "RAMAYANA TRAILS"
Tour includes all the places realated the Story of Ramayan... Thats such interesting...
Sri Lanka conserved many places related to the story... Specially,
Rawana Cave & Waterfall (Fall)
Underground Blue Pond 🔥❤️
Worth watching that advertisement on Sri Lankan Airlines Channel 🤩❤️
I’m the Srilankan, SriLanka has sita hide place called sita elliya.
And hanuman takes himalaya parts of including medicine Ayurvedic plants
In SriLanka has Rumassala island same as himalya Ayurvedic plant includes. So srilanka ancient story explains that island is hanuman takes part of it.
Your srilanka is called ceylone or simhala dweep by historians...and only becuase of the tourism and to get cash from tourism ......govt started this sita and hanuman parts...but as per the valmiki ramayana, tha ravana lanka is completely different and dont know what happened to it.
@Thrillex4523that's not real ramsetu of ramayana,because its all are sands and rocks, real ramsetu was made of woods, bamboos and other natural things by Nal and Neel, and after saving Sita Mata Shri Rama destroyed that Ram Setu for protection of Lanka, also Lanka isn't Maldives...
@Thrillex4523 i was about to reply for this expected question.. but @jetha199 replied..thank you
Sita Eliya is a recent naming. The name could also refer to "cold". Which is apt given Nuwara Eliya's climate.
I am also Sri Lankan and better informed. The Sri Lanka of today was called Singhal as mentioned in Mahabharat. That is the original name of the Sri Lanka you see today. The Singhal nation in Mahabharat fought on the Kaurava side, and that is why there is a caste called Karava in Sri Lanka.
During Tsunami back in 2004, ocean water withdraw from shore 1 to 2 km back. During that time people saw temple like ruins off of south beaches of Sri lanka.
Hi, do you have any news articles on it?
I'm sri lanken, so as a sri lanken we have our own story of ravana same as you all having you believes
bullshit, there is no ravan story in sri lankan folklore
00:02 Hanuman's journey to Lanka is interpreted differently by archaeologist Rupa Bhati.
00:49 Ravan's Lanka was east of Maldives on the Equator.
01:30 Earth's crust below the ocean is unusually thin
02:06 Evidence of islands submerging due to volcanic activity
02:47 Speculation on Sri Lanka as Ravan's Lanka
03:24 Sri Lanka's name given in 1972, possibly part of Ravana's Kingdom
03:58 Sri Lanka was referred to as Simal in the past
04:38 Sri Lanka is not Ravan's Lanka but possibly a submerged island with volcanic activity
Crafted by Merlin AI.
Wdym by Merlin AI, was it a joke or something?
Merlin AI summarizes a video by highlighting key points with their timestamps, so its just.@@harshitsardana391
Yes, quite agree. Ravana’s Lanka was not SriLanka. Lanka’s earliest name was Sinhalaya or Helaya.
@@sujeevadealwis5513it was also known as Ceylon, right? Any relevance?
@ That was what the British called. When it was made a republic in 1972, the name was changed to Sri Lanka
Sir, Pampa is referred in Valmiki Ramayana. Actually Pampa River is in Kerala and there is also a place Rameshwaram in Kerala. Can you throw some light on this...
The river flowing through hampi was called as pampa back then … hence the name place came from pampi became hampi … hanuman birth place is close enough to hampi
Pampa was Hampe or Hampi. Hampi is believed to be a part of Kishkinda.
@@PrashanthBSPBSThat river has been called Tungabhadra for the longest of times not Pampa.
Pampa is actually Hampi in Karnataka!!
Last thousand years 😂SL history has now has over 120000 years history quote
Evidence of human colonization in Sri Lanka appears at the site of Balangoda. Balangoda Man arrived on the island about 125,000 years ago and has been identified as Mesolithic hunter-gatherers who lived in caves. Several of these caves, including the well-known Batadombalena and the Fa Hien Cave, have yielded many artifacts from these people, who are currently the first known inhabitants of the island.
❤❤❤
If East of Maldives, then the present day Sri Lanka may also be part of Ravana's Lanka.
According to Ramayana distance between India and Ravanlanka is 1280 kms..
400 yojna right ?
@@shivampandey-mc5qf 100 yojnas
But 5 days ke under kese bana diya ram setu🤔🤔🤔
@@Supremelegend1897kyuki kahi saare log the toh 5 days mein construct karna koi badi baat nahi hai.
@@shivampandey-mc5qf 100 yojanas , 1 Yojana = 12 km, hence 100 x 12 = 1200 km
What about the Rameshwaram temple location? It is said Ram Ji made the shivling before crossing the setu that was built. And it’s right near the Ram setu that’s there today?
In another interview Oak sir stated that, there is no mention of Rameshwaram in walmiki ramayana, current Ramsetu is a natural structure not a manmade structure. I think Prabhu Ram consecrated shivling in rameshwaram may be because that was the travel route to actual Lanka via Sighal dweep (current Srilanka)
It’s quite common for writers to use existing phenomena, real life personalities and even events woven into their fiction. There’s no definite evidence in Sri Lanka to support the existence of Ravana. It’s not found in our folklore even. The sites that are commonly shown as sites connected to Ramayana are of an earlier period of Buddhist civilisation, probably even earlier than Anuradhapura. For the existence of Ram and Sita temples, there may be simple explanations such as immigrants bringing their religions here and constructing temples to practice it. Best is to carbon date them to ascertain their antiquity. In any case, the version of Ramayana that you find in south of India and. North of Sri Lanka is not the same as the original that Valmiki wrote. It has been changed
@@virajp6709you are speaking communist history 😅 Ram setu is man made it has been proved
When it's proved?@@Sinha78685
Sri lanka in the past was known as Sinhaladweep or Lankadweep
All the relatives of Ravan died in battle, except Vibhishan. Vibhishan lived like a Vaishnava.
The present day population of Sri Lanka has 3 major race:
1. The indegenous inhabitants of Lanka ( The children of Vibhishan ).
2. Buddhist preachers who migrated to Sri Lanka from Odisha or Bengal.
3. The Tamil people who migrated to Sri Lanka during the Chola period.
buddhists preachers are not who migrated to lanka
sinhalese race started by west bengal genes mixed with local indigenous inhabitants. they were animists or hindus for years
after many years , ashoka s son gave buddhism to sinhalese , until then , sinhalese were hindus
so who came to lanka was hindus not buddhists.
yes tamils came to sri lanka with cholas in 997 AD (after 1700 years of arrival of sinhalese,)then chola s couldnt ever capture whole island of lanka bcz of strong sinhalese kingdoms, bcz of sinhalese resistence cholas couldnt even stay in lanka for at least 80 years, but tamil population was stayed there and there were significant tamil population enough in lanka to form JAFFNA KINGDOM in 1215 AD (within 200 years of tamils arrival to lanka)
but they came from north india , so they can be buddhists too, bcz north india was buddhist that time,
according to sri lankan books , (may be these can be just myths)buddha have told to god shakra to protect vijaya s voyage to lanka bcz sinhalese and sri lanka will be the only place where buddhism will be alive for 5000 years and sinhalese and lanka will be commited to buddhas dharma marga ,I m just saying what I heard and read as a kid
when we see the times , vijaya s time and buddha s time are also almost same timeline
and sinhalese and sri lanka sacrificed so much already for buddhism and simply its a joke buddhism without lanka
so I think may be those things can be true...
sinhalese and sri lanka did these
1- written down pali tripitaka on books to protect it during a 6 year famine called baminithiya saaya( baminithiya sagathaya)thats how pali tripitaka was protected to the future
2- originating THERAVADA tradition
3- spread it to thailand myanmar and cambodia(sinhalese call it dharma doota seva)
4- protecting bodhgaya for future by srimath anagarika dharmapala (a sinhalese lankan)
5- he also founded mahabodhi society still active in india and lanka
6- making and designing global buddhist flag by lanka
7- giving protection for world oldest human planted tree. a branch of original india bodhi tree
8- first country who spread buddhism to europe by founding pali text society
9- did pancha maha vada (5 great debates) with brits xians which drag attention of europe to buddhism which lead sir henry steel aulcutt and blawatski to come to lanka
10- modern mahameuna monasteries do dharma doota seva s world wide
If srilanka is not Ravans Lanka lot of questions will be unanswered!!! Ni wer eliya is Ashoka vana where seetha was kept captive, the Rama bodha where Ramas forces were aligned. The aginipravesha village where even today the tribals take an oath!!! So many points to ponder!
Your question 1
Who built Sigiriya Ravana or Kashyapa?
Answer from Google 😎
Kashyapa is credited with the construction of the Sigiriya citadel and the surrounding city😊 🚩jai maharishi kashyap 🚩
Well. I'm a Sri Lankan, and we believe sigirya was king Ravana's kingdom. King Kashyapa has lived in Sigiriya just for a short period. After calculating the time it's impossible to believe he build the whole sigirya in a such a short period. And there are so many evidence that can prove Sigirya used to be kind Ravana's palace. But still we haven't discovered 100% accurately that sigirya is Kind Ravana's palace. That's why you found the answer as kind Kashyapa on Google. Trust me cuz I'm a Sri Lankan. We hope to reveal this truth to the world soon . Paradise of Asia ❤SL
@@minkdiscoveryI’m Sri Lankan too. There are no archaeological evidences which prove it’s built by Ravana but many evidences suggesting it was built by King Kashyapa. Ravana is a mythical story at that time. Just like Harry Potter.
So many SriLankan people's not believe ravana story because They want to show their are well educated😂
Ceylon is the name that the British gave
Ancient Greeks called Ceylon
as CEYĹAN !!!
Ravaans lanka is Sri Lanka that is no doubt but Maldives was also a part of raavans kingdom it can happen where Ravaan frequently visits and established many things. But it can happen Raavan born in Maldives and then settle in lanka . He did not separate it from his kingdom and it might be his financial capital. These things can happen. But lanka war happened in Sri Lanka.
The Ramayana, one of the two major Sanskrit epics of ancient Indian literature, has been rewritten numerous times over the years. While most people are familiar with Valmiki's / Kampa's Ramayana, countless more versions tell the story from distinct cultural, regional, and religious perspectives.
some people can give opinions in their point of view. But they are not always right. Sri Lanka has so many places and historical evidence which can prove Ravana was a ruler of this country. And he says Sinhala Deepa was the name not Lanka. Guys Sri Lanka has been called by so many names at the same time. we were called as Lanka and after Britian's came here, they changed the name to Ceylon. What we did was after we got the freedom we got our old name.
the thing is some young Indians questioning Ramayana and most of them are not agreeing what Rama did with Seetha when she return. talking about Ravana and his power, his skill is surprisingly increasing among Indians. And this guy would not like to give that identity to Sri Lanka just because Sri Lanka is such a small country. he doesn't want to say that Ravana came from such a small country and did all that damage to them that going to talk about thousands of years.
and he doesn't want name any other country as a Ravana's Lanka and just say it's a Maldives Island which we can't see now. Are u serious? the thing is they want to ignore all the ancient books and places and evidence in both countries just to save their history and pride.
Sri Lanka is a part of AkhandBharat ...Chill bro ....
@@sainirup8079 nope it is not. We are different from u guys in every possible way. We have our own proud history. Indians always try to point out that they are the best among all the countries. that's ok. but do not try to put your hands into other countries.
@@fromheaven8157 Yes, the name Sri Lanka was officially given as the name to India's neighbouring country only in 1972, by changing it from Ceylon that how it was called by the British, and prior to receiving independence in 1948 it was called British Ceylon. In 1972, the country became a republic within the Commonwealth, and its name was changed to Sri Lanka. Prior to that until 1972 it was Dominion of Ceylon and had a Governor-General who represented the British Monarch (Queen or King) just like it is today with Canada, Australia and New Zealand. In the ancient times Sri Lanka was called by many other names other than Ceylon and among them are Seilan, Serendib (Called by Arabs), Simhaladvipa, Tambapanni, Taprobane (Called by Greeks). Unfortunately there are a few in Sri Lanka are trying to distort history by saying that Sri Lanka is Ravana's Lanka that is mentioned in the Ramayana Indian Epic. These few people in as you mentioned to get cash from tourism and attract Indian tourists even falsely claim that the Sigiriya World Heritage Site was Ravana's palace. Sigiriya has nothing to do with Ravana mentioned in the Ramayanaya. There is archealogical and historical artifact evidence that Sigiriya was built by the Sri Lankan king Kashyapa I of Anuradhapura (of the Kingdom of Anuradhapura in Sri Lanka), Cuurently it is considered that the Sigiriya Rock World Heritage Site built by king Kashyapa I of Anuradhapura was used as a Royal Pleasure Garden. Based on Sri Lankan archealogical findings Ravana's Lanka is completely different that the currently known country of Sri Lanka. Dr Senarath Dissanayake who served as the Director General of the Department of Archeology has spoken a lot about the lie of trying to claim that Ravana mentioned in the Ramayana Epic lived in Sri Lanka, and one can fine several discussions where he says about it can be found in videos on UA-cam (like the one that has the title "රාවණා තනිකරම බොරුවක් - පුරාවිද්යා අධ්යක්ෂ ඡනරාල් මහාචාර්ය සෙනරත් දිසානායක | History Special EP"). Even
Ellawala Medhananda Thero (එල්ලාවල මේධානන්ද) who is a Sri Lankan Buddhist monk and an academic scholar has spoken about the false claim that some people claim Ravana lived in Sri Lanka (one can find the video titiled "රාවණාගේ ඇත්ත නැත්ත" and "රාවණාගේ ඇත්ත නැත්ත | Story of Ravana | එල්ලාවල මේධානන්ද හිමි | Ellawala Medhananda Thero").
@@fromheaven8157 Ellawala Medhananda Thero from Sri Lanka explains about the words Seetha Eliya - means සීත එලිය (Seetha means cold) , Ravana - means නාද කරන්නා (i.e. one who makes a noise), Seethawaka - සීත වක (Seetha means cold) all these names have nothing to do with Ravana or Seetha that is mentioned in the Indian Ramayana Epic.
@@sainirup8079 India is part of AkhandMuslimdesh ...Chill bro...
If ram sethu is not the one near rameswaram, then where ram worshiped shiv before crossing for Lanka? Makes no sense that he worshipped shivji at rameswaram and walk all the way to kanyakumari and build a sethu for 100s of kilometers in open sea. I don't think so. If current Sri lanka was refered as sinhala dweep and not Lanka, may be it was close to Srilanka as an island. May be a tiny island which is now submerged.
Sri Lankan here:
Sri Lanka was called Sinhapura by foreigners only after the arrival of Sinhalese prince Vijaya 2567 years ago.
Sri Lanka was called Lanka in Sinhalese before 1972 and the prefix *Sri* was given to Lanka only in 1972 following the party name of then ruling party, which was called "Sri Lanka Freedom Party".
This hypothesis can be totally wrong. If Srilanka is not actual ravan's lanka, it will defeat the several myths and legenda surrounding the temple nomenclature in Tamil Nadu. For example , the 'Ramar paadham - Rama's foot' in Kodikkarai , TN - Intitally Ram thought, this is the best place to cross to Srilanka, before going to Dhanush Koti. The several temples near rameshwaram - which talks about Ram's legend. All will go for a toss , if Srilanka is actually not Ravana's lanka. Even from a geological point of view ,the presence of Coral reefs and floating rocks will further defeat the argument.
Yes exactly.
Please visit the SriLanka, SriLanka has sita hide place ,,in cave area it is called Sita eliya. And Hanuman takes himalaya parts , and that parts have Ayurvedic medicine, same Ayurvedic medicines plant s including place called ‘Rumassala’ Island Sri Lanka.
Another ancient place has ravana Lives and lay’s down place (sleeping place) called Yahangala, Ravana Ella, Ravana Lena etc.
if you visit the SriLanka. You can see your own eyes and believe that.
Not only the comment.
Baseless arguments.
@@NadeeDil-v4u Ellawala Medhananda Thero from Sri Lanka explains about the words Seetha Eliya - means සීත එලිය (Seetha means cold) , Ravana - means නාද කරන්නා (i.e. one who makes a noise/sound), Seethawaka - සීත වක (Seetha means cold) all these names have nothing to do with Ravana or Seetha that is mentioned in the Indian Ramayana Epic.
power of money & fund to destroy any religion। this is one of the Attempt by fundamentalist
Right it's Kumari kandam submerged Island 200 yojana from ujjain
Omg I was searching for this
soo what? sri lanka is at the east of maldives😂,
and as he says sri lanka name was given in 1972 , bcz brits changed its name as ceylon ,even tho sri part wasnt before , the island was called as LANKADWEEPA (dweepa meens island in sinhalese) in sri lankan ancient books and rock tablets(shila lekhana in sinhala language)
brits came and named maldives and sri lanka and made a new ruling area called british ceylon
as brits come and named ban -pak-in-myanmar all as one british raj
what sri lanka did in 1972 was recognice their old country name as their official name again by removing brits gave one
imagine india was once bharat , brits named it as india , but india kept it even after independence
what sri lank did was , sri lanka once was lankadweepa , brits named it ceylon, but sri lanka didnt kept it and changed their name back to their previous one adding SRI part to begining
Ranveer says this claim is "evidence-based" but neither he nor Oak shares the evidence with the viewers, so we are still at sea (pun not intended).
Yes sri lanka was identified as lankadweepa , sinhaladweepa ,heladweepa ,not time to time , AT THE SAME TIME , as synonyms .☺️.
And In sinhala language Ra means sun 🌞 .(even the god of sun in egypt also called RA as same as in sinhala ). Vana is comming from VARNA .means caste in sinhala (also in my indian language , varna is use to call castes)...so RAVANA means the sun caste in sinhalese..
Its hillarious to see dravidian tamils always try to claim ravana as their tamil 😂😂😂
@@Togetherwego12 actually,
Spoken sinhala = IRA
Formal sinhala = SURYA there other bunch of synonyms but won't put here as they don't make any difference..
It's not Ra in anywhere..
Ira most probably from old sinhala(prakrit) or a thathbhava word from sanskrit Surya..😊
@@ChannaJayawardhana-h1oIm a sinhalese..by the way in Sinhala , sun was called as RA in original form.(what we use now is simple modern sinhala.)
2) And varna is use to call kula (castes)...its even unbeievable to say sinhalese like you dont know VARNA is use to call castes in sinhala language 😂😂😂..
Have you ever heard of varnabeda jaathi beda words?..
Here varnabeda was meant caste problems....color problems never had in sri lanka in past.but caste problems were 😂thats what varna beda meant
If you ever went to sunday dhamma school in 🇱🇰 you would have definitly know that the sinhalese text books have " CHATHURVARNA" as a lesson.😂in there chathurvarna in sinhalese means also 4 castes.we learn them as kshathriya, brahmana , waishya , shudra in 🇱🇰
වර්ණ- colors
වර්න - caste
Pls at least ask from your grand parents .they wil say you.sad to see sinhalese loosing the knowledge of their own language 😢
@@ChannaJayawardhana-h1o dont argue with me Im not a sinhalese.I say what I know.but I dont knoe much about your language to argue with you.but I can confirm sihalese word varna = caste too
Where are they going to prove this RAVAN nonsense over Sinhalese king Kashyapa's palace built in SIGIRIYA (සීගිරිය ) in 3 AD century in Sri Lanka?
Sigiriya had been occupied by
WAISRAVANA !!!
His father was WISHRAWAS SAGE
who was one of the SAPTA RHISHIS
who composed VEDA VERSES
@ about 2 5 0 0 B.C. !!!
Oh crap @@harisaraharisara7828
I think this refers to SiwHelaDweepa not SinhalaDweepa. Siw (means 04) hela Dweepa consists of Jabu dweepa, Lanka dweepa, Kuru dweepa and Giri dweepa. Lanka Dweepa was located in east of Sri Lanka.
Sie Hela Dviepa is the remaining part
of Ravana's Lanka !!!
A bigger part has got sunk
at the Maha Bharata war !!!
Ancient time, Lanka was the capital city and it was called Lanka Pura. Sihaladveepa, Hela diva, Rathnadeepa were some names called Sri Lanka in the ancient time. Lanka pura was huge city with Golden palaces and serene natural waterfalls. Rawans Lanka means the main city of the country. Not the entire country. Even in resent history, Queen Kuweni helped Wijaya to concurred the country by assessing her uncles and Yakkha leaders who gathered in Lankapura for celebration... So Lanka or Lankapura was the ancient capital of Sihaladveepa.
havent you guys heard about " kumari kandam " may be that could explain the whole disappearance of Ravans lanka. A bigger peice of the current sri lanka would have just submerged in to the sea.
Submerged port near puducherry was also found roughly few years back around 10 km and 3km wide which might co relate with kumari kandam , also zealandia which again talks about the submerged portions of new zealand.. correct me if I am wrong
Ranveer should stop using the words "extreme-right-wing people". These right wing left wing names are used in american politics, not here in Bharat.
BJP is right wing
@@GauravKunwar-js7dcMore like Centre-Right
He should say extremities Right Wing
@@Samudra121🤭🤭🤭
Already about actual Sri Lanka is discussed by Janaki Ram cosmic UA-cam channel in Telugu.
As per valmiki Ramayana Ravana lanka is 100 yojanas distance means 1213 KMs on south west. If you take direction and distance Ravan Lanka is located around Maldeves. Please note that sri Lanka is only 50 KMs away from Dhanushkoti. More over it is on south east .
Sri Lanka was part of South India during Tetra Yuga. Nobody needed to build a bridge to go to that place. Ram Setu was formed by tectonic movements and sea levels changes during the last deglaciation period.
Sri lanka has a hill called RUMASALA where Himalaya soil matched...there are more people worship god hanumantha in present time also..
In Sronlanka there is Mound in Galle which have plants endemic only to India,
this is one of the most exciting subjects I have come across in a long time. archeo astronomy and all that stuff that fixes the time and events. Really mind blowing info. This is real knowledge that the newer generations need to know.
\
But sadly some so called liberals strike off our history by saying mythology and they think they are cool 😢
Was lemuria (Kumari kundam) present there at the Southern most area of Indian Pennensular at the time of Ramayana??
Lemuria Had A Huge Territory South Of India To Vietnam To Philippines & Areas Nearby.
Lemuria is just a myth
Wow. If this is true and gets known to many people, it's really going to be a big blow to the society that has been believing in certain things for generations.
Why people dont like this video? .views are rising.likes are at the same place
Yo bro, at the time of ravana, the sri lanka island was a part of the big island that was lanka, and it might be that sri lanka might have been a mountain types hence the ram setu was made to go to sri lanka then it connected to lanka thru big island because that time sea levels were down, very down. eg. newzeland, has a massive island submerged in sea, and new zeland was a mountain type hence the part that is now new zeland only the top is avaliable, rest is submerged. like wise lanka, sri lanka
I don't agree with this logic..but sri lanka was a huge country and many part of Sri Lanka are under water
Srilanka and India share same tectonic plate means if India mainland further moves upnorth , so doeslanka study geology first
Please highlight the facts about Ram setu.... actually the Valmiki Ramayana says that the setu formed was 100 yojana in length, and the distance between india and sri lanka is not that long, and when i came to know this thought, it created some doubts to my mind, but this video clears my doubts, however if you can give some highlights on particularly the ram setu, i would be greatfull. Thanks
The Rama Setu, Bhagwan Rama's bridge is specifically mentioned in Ramayana, Yuddha kanda, Chapter 22, text 76, to be 100 yojanas (1287 kms) long and 10 yojanas (128 kms) wide and was built in just 5 days. Presently, the Rama Setu from Dhanushkoti in India to Talai Mannar in Sri Lanka is only 48 kms long. This apparent and huge difference in the distance has led many scholars to propose that Lanka of the Ramayana may be a different place than present day Sri Lanka.Actually, the difference in distance can very easily be reconciled by understanding the principle of yuga bheda and kala bheda, differences that occur in material manifestations by the influence of time and the changing millenniums. Here are a few examples: It is clearly mentioned in the Srimad Bhagavatam 10.52.2 that when Muchukunda, who had been in deep slumber since the satya yuga, woke up in Dwapara yuga, he noticed that the size of all the human beings, animals, trees and plants was severely reduced (samviksya ksullakan martyan pasun virud-vanaspatin). In Srimad Bhagavatam 10.52.12, when Jarasandha was chasing Krishna and Balarama, They climbed a mountain named Pravarshana. Jarasandha set fire around the mountain and Krishna and Balarama jumped from the mountaintop from a height of eleven yojanas!!! (88 miles or 142 kms). The Pravarshana Mountain, which probably may not be the highest mountain in Dwapara yuga (as the Himalayas may have been the highest), located somewhere in North or Central India, is mentioned to be 142 kms high.
The tallest mountain in Kali yuga according to modern scientists is Mount Everest, which is only 8.848 kms, or less than 9 kms (not even 1 yojana). In Ramayana also, there is a description of a mountain 100 yojanas in height (800 miles or 1288 kms). Even if it may be argued that the mountain might be submerged in the sea, scientists say that the deepest point in the sea is the Challenger deep in the Mariana Trench in the Pacific Ocean, and it is 10.994 kms deep (again less than 1 yojana).
Thus in kali yuga, there is no mountain more than 1 yojana in height whereas in Treta yuga, we see mountains over 100 yojanas in height. Even at the end of Dvapara yuga and beginning of Kali yuga, we see mountains 11 yojanas high. There are innumerable examples of geographical descriptions in the Vedic scriptures which are incomprehensible to the tiny brains of Kali yuga. The faithless outrightly reject these descriptions and brand the scriptures to be mythology, legends or epics. Those with some faith try to adjust these with some interpretation or try to connect with some scientific explanation as if Science is of absolute credibility.
Who is this man to decide what was Lanka and what was not
Lanka is a portion of Sinhaladeepa though now referred as Sri Lanka for the entire Sinhaladeepa.
This guy really crazy, Ravan wasn't live in a volcano country. still have evidence that can be proof Ravan lived in Sri Lanka. I heard this new things recently.
You konw a thing the story its said Lanka of ravan was big city and it has Walls this Sri Lanka we are seeing is not real it got its name in morden time and it said it had a big areas he must also be correct go study history broo 😂
@@gisha.p9527both countires have their own history. So Sri lanka has its own history. Dont point anything according your history, because we have same thing for indian history which is different for what you know. But we dont care and we dont say this and that. Respect other countries too. Keep your history only for your country. And we will do the same. Peace
Present Srilanka can’t be Ravana’s Lanka. When Vanaras were debating who can cross the ocean to reach Lanka the distance mentioned was 100 yojanas. One yojana is 8 miles. This means present Srilanka is not Ravana’s Lanka as the distance from Rameshvaram (close to which is the Gandhamadana mountain from which Hanuman Ji leaped to reach banks) to Srilanka today is about 30 miles.
One cannot rule out catastrophic events causing tectonic shifts in landmass bringing lanka closer to India.
aren't sri lanka and india on the same tectonic plate tho? That means if India goes upward, Sri Lanka does too
Krsna explains in Bhagavad-gita 8.4 "Physical nature is known to be endlessly mutable." Hence it is not unreasonable to infer that the sea level would also be subjected to periods of rising and falling throughout the history of the material creation including the time during and after the Ramayana." kindly refer the Srimad Bhagavatam (especially 3rd Canto) and the puranas which give exact descriptions of all ages right from the beginning of creation and even of the future ages and even of what is beyond the domain of Time, Kala.If anyone who objects must in turn be able to give a credible answer to the question of why "Sri Lanka-Ceylon" is not found where the sastras say Lanka should be? At least 100 yojanas (1287 km) away, on or near the equator, and at the meridian passing through Avanti. What I have shown closely agrees with sastra but the location of modern "Sri Lanka-Ceylon" does not."
If the same distance has remained from Treta yuga, then you should also be able to show the mountains from Ramayana which are 1287 kms high or at least 2 yojanas high that Lanka is on the same meridian.
Ravan was taking shivling from kailash to Lanka, but was intercepted in Gokarna (coastal Karnataka). So his Lanka was near Maldives
There is a ancient port in srilanka called Gorkanna
@@ravindurajapakse7270 oh really....
@@ravindurajapakse7270 ya I saw on Google.
It's said that at gokarna in Karnataka, lord Ganesha intercepted Ravan. And the shivlinga is in a temple here
nilesh oak had told south India including nasik was ruled by ravana then gokarn is part of south India
Who built Ram Setu
We have places called Sita Eliya where Sita Devi was hidden
Mountain of herbs from the Himalayas dropped by Lord Hanuman
Please don't twist ancient history according to your whims and fancies
Pardon me according to you Ramayana is a lie
I need a reply to my comment
Let me give you the full story of fraud Nilesh Oak.
He came up with a fraud date for Ramayana which is 12K BCE. He then realised that at that time (12K BCE), sea water level was that low that a bridge to Sri Lanka was not needed. Bhagwan Rama can just walk to Lanka, no need Rama Setu.
His ego did not allow him to admit that he's wrong.
So, he did the next best thing, tell lies to cover up the original mistake.
So, he comes out with first lie, which is Sri Lanka is not Ravana's Lanka, it is lost in Indian ocean.
Then, 2nd lie, Rama setu is a replica, the real Nala Setu is lost in Indian Ocean.
3rd lie, Vibishana has died. Vibishana that met Sahadeva during Mahabharata is some other Vibishana, not Ravana's brother. He ignores the fact that Vibishana is a chiranjeevi (immortal).
I can give you a list of many more of his fraud.
Ramayana is real, people like this fraud here is the ones that bastardise Itihasa for personal gains.
That should tell you the quality of this podcast.
Ranveer is know as pseudoscience mascot of India for a reason.
Ellawala Medhananda Thero from Sri Lanka explains about the words Seetha Eliya - means සීත එලිය (Seetha means cold) , Ravana - means නාද කරන්නා (i.e. one who makes a noise), Seethawaka - සීත වක (Seetha means cold) all these names have nothing to do with Ravana or Seetha that is mentioned in the Indian Ramayana Epic.
139000 views x5.34 = divided by 60 and divided by 24 hrs = 515 days wasted this video clip
I'm sorry..But Lanka is not on 0 degree equator
He is referring to where it was before it submerged not the current day Sri Lanka
Has no one heard about Kumari Kandam?🤷🏼
Its submerged kumarikandam or lemuria .lord.murugan was the kind of lemuria
Ravana was a Tamil king who ruled from south kumari ( kumaros) to imayamalay ( himalaya). He belonged to Pandya dynasty .
😂😂😂😂😂
Ravana was a “hela king” not a tamil king. Dnt have any proof to say he is tamil. (Hela means old srilanka)
@@DRvlogs19 brother go and read history when was srilanka named Sri Lanka
@@mba056-lokeshwaran.k2 i can assure you that revan is not a tamil king. I know the history here.
@@mba056-lokeshwaran.k2 read lankawathara suthraya.
M not sure but 0.0000000, 0.0000000 coordinates on Google maps shows somewhere near Gulf of Guinea, near African continent
How could you say Sri Lanka is where longitude and latitude intersect ? Null Island near Gulf of guinea is (0,0). He is neither archeologist nor a geologist. May be a conspiracy theorist.
Sri Lanka was definitely Ravan’s Lanka….
LOL Are you saying Hanuman Travelled 100 yojanas from to find srilanka , kid time to read valmiki ramayan seriouly
Full episode link please
Sri Lanka is Ravans Lanka
lol agreed only people who ddnot rad valmki ramayana will beleive it@@sirajsriranjan7449
@Thrillex4523 remind me again did hanuman has to fly 100 yojanas if srilanka is nearby , all these theories are opening and breaking age old dogams
Sorry to say it is a distortion for suppressing the truth....
what about rameshwaram then?
if true this would change alot of what we know but i think ramayana and mahabharata happened but was exaggerated later
Many people just watch tv serial they didn't read Valmiki Ramayan or ved vyasa Mahabharat.
That's why they don't know that this is not the original sri Lanka that is mentioned in Ramayan
Dear All, please dont believe Archeogists who have distorted history in all means. Archeology its self is an aspect of colonial beuracracy in modern times. If you want to who you are, where you are from and your history, go back in time. Push yourself to record your own history of your grandparents and beyond till it all connects. What is not printed is written, what is not written is carved and the truth is carved on stone.
India was not india when this all happened, Bharath was not Bharath when this all happened. And Sri Lanka wasnt Sri Lanka when this all happened.
Modern day Sri Lanka has carved history for more than 125000 years. The well kept secret of modern time. The great city of Atlantis, known as Atalankawa. Sri Lanka was always known as a Dweepa and every 5000 years during several Buddhas' and Rawanas' times it was known as Ojadweepa, Mandadweepa, Waradweepà & now Lankadweepa.
Remember that Rawana is a lineage and a glorious position not a King. There were several sakwithi names as Ravanas Maha Tharu, Maha Bali, Maha Manu, Maha Siva, Maha Ravulu.
In the story of Ramayana its one of these Ravanas who dealt with and definitely not the one Valmiki wrote of.
Rama and Ravanas are all of one kingdom its all one but unfortunately modern India looks for its glory from distorted history. History will be written where the global geopolitical power is formed from. So be it. But remember Truth will win.
We from Lanka are the sons of light, the Ravanas the greatest of Asuras who only adore the Sun, Moon and the Dharma.
To sum up, dont believe what's written trust what is carved. Read, see and realise and you will see everything clear.
Just an advice; least from this year stop burning our king (Ravanadhahan), stop celebrating cremation of our princes Holika (holi festival) & finally stop celebrating the burn of the Lanka (Deepawali)
Its a pity to note a country's national festivals revolve upon destruction of a great civilization.
In relation to this video , ive got nothing much to say. Words are spoken.
Just beware of Karma.
Indians are creating a new story because of the time has come, my brother.....
Welcome to Sri Lanka ravana son 👑👑👑
There are many places in Sri Lanka associated with Ravana, such as the Ella Caves, Ravana Falls, Sigiriya (Ravana's palace), Kelaniya Temple (dedicated to Lord Vibhishana), Thotupola Mountain (believed to be a landing site for Ravana's flying machine), Ritigala mountain, Roomassala mountain, and the Seetha Amman Temple in Nuwara Eliya, etc... However, Sri Lankans do not worship Ravana. Instead, they primarily follow Buddhism and venerate the Buddha, along with some Hindu/Buddhist deities.
The Sinhalese people, who make up 75% of Sri Lanka's population, are believed to have ancestral connections with the people of Odisha and West Bengal in India. Thousands of royal families migrated to Sri Lanka around 2,500 years ago and integrated with the local communities, including those associated with Ravana's legacy. The Sinhalese language, which is derived from Sanskrit, shares similarities with the language spoken in Odisha. The Sinhalese adopted Buddhism and various cultural elements from India during the rule of Emperor Ashoka.
Ravana Lanka is not Sri Lanka.
The volcano near Indonesia is called krakatova. It happened some 200 to 300 years ago and Dutch record is there. But still the volcano is there standing outside ocean. There is no such thing east of Maldives.
Anyone noticed that two persons but one voice sound🤔
Voices are completely different.
You mean both sounded same ?
Then what about rameshwaram and dhanushkodi
Full video link??
Sri Lanka used to be called Sihala Deepa or Hela Deepa
I'm back ravana 👑👑👑
Doctor's differ. So that may be or may not be ; still we believe in scriptures and histories although these are the rumours either that we heard in our ears or read in books. But we get some teachings and morals out of Ramayan. We have no practical view whether Ravana's LANKA was Shrilanka or Singhal. However we thank very much cordially Mr. Ranveer alias TRS for his sincere effort to let the message to reach billions of Global inhabitants consequently. Best wishes to TRS CLIPS. 👍🏼❤👍🏼
If there was lanka then where was kumari kandam....
Dude Ramayana and Mahabharata is just a novels like Harry Potter and this stupid politician fooling people for their political gain by saying those novels are true😂😂
Your right all need money earn for history 😂
@ including Islam🙏
Educated Northie 👏
Who is he?
All Sinhalese know that majority of the island is sunk. Rawana city is sunk. The Maldives are the remnants of mountains. This guy needs to visit the island and see how much of the Sinhalese traditions and culture are involved with Rawana. Come visit and see his martial arts, medical practices, and even places throughout, baring his name. Simply put, where did you find this guy 😆 Although yes, correct name before Sri Lanka was Sinhaladip. Think Samudragupta inscription says the same 👍🏽😮
So you agree Sri Lanka wasn't called Lanka back then ? Then Nilesh is right about SL not being Ravana's Lanka. Also the 100 yojana distance between Bharat & Lanka mentioned in Ramayan is not existing between India & SL.
Sri Lanka is actually not the original name of what we today call Sri Lanka. Seriously go and read the Mahabharata. It clearly calls Sri Lanka "Simhaladvipa". This who "Sri Lanka" business is new historically speaking.
1 minute silence for those who thought srilanka as ravan's lanka..
Actually one minute silent for u
But it is
It is reality cause it is mentioned in Valmiki Ramayana that ravana's Lanka is situated at south east of kanyakumari and srilanka is situated at south west so according to that Srilanka is not actual Lanka@@dcpage3422
one minute silence for those who agree with this logic ( like you ) 😂
I disagree. How do you explain the significance of Ram Setu and the entire Rameshwaram sequence of events?
What about LANKA-RAN located at Azarbaijan.
Cant you see the behaviour of our Sri Lankans and all the crazy things we do.
Kumari kandam why can you try this
Sir, Antarctica is Ravan's Lanka.
One book infinite angles ⭐
Plesse provide this podcast in hindi also.
One of the most Stupidest Explanation & Reasoning ever.....
😑😑😑😑
Then whats truth
history is written by the victor. history is filed with liars.if he lives, and we die, his truth becomes written and ours is lost
Kumari Kandam ( Lemuria IsLand)
True bro
Explosion in is unlikely as such a phonomenon , as archeology can revealnit
Yes Absolutely what Nilesh oak sir Said is True 💯. We have to dig deep to know what is real and what is fake. Sinhala dweepa(Srilanka) is not Ravana Lanka. And the Present structure between Bhārat and Simhala dweepa is not Real Rāma Sethu these are facts as per Vālmiki Rāmāyana, Padma Mahapurana. This present structure is only 30-40km long. 100yojanas ≠ 40km. 1yojana = 13km approximately. So 1300km is 100yojanas. Where is the 1300km between Bhārat and Simhala dweepa?? You might say Simhala might be way more far away once upon a time. No! Even in Continental drifting, both Bhārat and Simhala dweepa travelled together with same distance. Both are not in different tectonic plates, both lies on the same Indian tectonic plate. In Padma Mahapurana it's clearly mentioned that Ramasethu was destroyed by Sri Rama himself for Vibhishana. This is truth. I know many Hindus still believe that present structure as Ramasethu But it's fake.
Vibhasana was big devotee of Ram । how he can destroy the bridge that passionately link his devotion toward Ram ।
@@bhavishdhankar1943 It's not like that. Vibhishana And his race was Rakshasa right. They are not humans. So he don't want Upcoming puny human generations entering Lanka and his kingdom.
@trs clips .bring janakiram cosmic channel to the show .he researched so much on this and told this in 2018 .
Sinhalay became Ceylon easy for British to pronounce...
Nice story...fool some layman..
Ranveer perhaps if you don't have a good resource abstain from doing jerky shows confusing people around
श्री लंका में रावण के महल मे 2000 साल पुरानी ईट का इस्तेमाल किस कहानी के सबूत है
There were 3 main tribes in Sri Lanka namely Yaksha, Naga and Deva
(01) Yaksha - Lankapura,Sirisavatthu.
(02) Naga - Kelaniya,Nagadeepa.
(04) Deva - Sabaragamuva,Kataragama
Prehistoric and Evidence that the above 3 tribes lived in our country Archaeologist Mr. Raj Somadeva has said through UA-cam media and it is also mentioned that people lived in our country in the Mahavamsa.
Yakka,deva,naaga,habara siwhela sinhala
Ramayana is mythical yet repetitive story which existed in every society in many forms. Then, why does it matter, where is lanka. It's just a debate of fools.😂
😂😂 control
Has anyone even tried where 0 longitude and latitude is.? Mate, that's hell away from east of Maldives. It's in Gulf of Guinea, called Null Island. 😑
Agree it's far away, west of Africa
Lol The Comment Section Is Just Soo Pathetic 😂...Srilankan Sinhalese Are Getting Triggered By Knowing The Fact That Srilanka Isn't Ravan's Kingdom lololololl 😂
Jatayupara in Kollam, proves he’s wrong