Particle Physics (29 of 41) What is a Photon? 13. Mie Scattering

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 тра 2015
  • Visit ilectureonline.com for more math and science lectures!
    In this video I will explain Mie scattering of photons scattering off large particles.
    Next video in the Particle Physics series can be seen at:
    • Particle Physics (30 o...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 56

  • @julianjawadahmad1006
    @julianjawadahmad1006 2 роки тому +5

    You're one of the best educators on youtube.

  • @Ameen_AAA
    @Ameen_AAA 8 місяців тому +1

    I'm still learning from your channel every now and then since 2014. Huge respect and thanks.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 місяців тому +1

      You are welcome. Glad you are still enjoying the videos. 🙂

  • @rainerdbeck1960
    @rainerdbeck1960 2 роки тому +9

    f should be replaced by lambda in the cos(r/f) and exp(-kr/f)

  • @lam62sw
    @lam62sw Рік тому +2

    This video is great!! And confusing, wish I wouldn’t have watched it first because Q from Mie Theory is typically extinction efficient not extinction coefficient (typically gamma). I was very confused until I could look up in a respected text book. This video is good but also a glossed over introduction so be-careful.

  • @bsht123456
    @bsht123456 8 років тому +2

    thank you so much, very nice lectures!

  • @v1kh58
    @v1kh58 7 років тому +16

    In Mie Scattering formula, shouldn't it be "r/lambda", instead of "r/f". Because r/f is not dimensionless. And cosine of some dimensional argument doesn't make sense.

    • @v1kh58
      @v1kh58 7 років тому +2

      BTW the explanation is really awesome

  • @SuperAliez
    @SuperAliez 6 років тому +1

    Gracias! Thank you! I understand much better the Mie Theory.

  • @muhammadfikrifansyuri4934
    @muhammadfikrifansyuri4934 8 років тому +1

    very helpful, thank you

  • @sabbadini96
    @sabbadini96 4 роки тому

    Have you some articles about Mie Scattering and it's computation?

  • @user-pp7vs2qr8o
    @user-pp7vs2qr8o 6 років тому

    Thank you so much sir.

  • @visionscience
    @visionscience 5 років тому

    Very nice ..thank u

  • @serathilsss
    @serathilsss 8 років тому +1

    +Michel van Biezen
    Thank you.
    but are there any relation between mie scattering with concentration of the particle?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 років тому +1

      +serathilsss The amount of scattering as a function of distance traveled does indeed depend on the concentration of the gas or particles the radiation travels through.

  • @keppela1
    @keppela1 5 років тому +3

    You've got both radius over frequency and radius over wavelength on the board. Is that right, or should all the equations be radius over wavelength??

    • @houhoutrad8748
      @houhoutrad8748 4 роки тому +1

      You are right! I think for dimensional consistency, the ration in the cos must be dimensionless, so it must be the wave length

  • @ahmo356
    @ahmo356 7 місяців тому

    sir, i wanna ask you what can be the phase function (P(pi)) in rayleigh backscattering, in a micro wave area and the study particle is ammonium sulfate

  • @randyzhang528
    @randyzhang528 4 роки тому +3

    Very helpful, thank you. I want to ask a question. What is the mean of "k" in Mie scattering?

  • @aymanselmy2793
    @aymanselmy2793 9 років тому

    thank you !!

  • @kalyanibrahma4057
    @kalyanibrahma4057 6 років тому +1

    hello. in the graph is it the ratio of r/lambda × 1/10 or is it that r/lambda= 1/10 and varies upto, r/lambda= 1

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  6 років тому +3

      Yes, it is a range of values. (between 1/10 and 1)

    • @kalyanibrahma4057
      @kalyanibrahma4057 6 років тому +2

      Michel van Biezen .. thankyou, u saved my sleep tonight

  • @user-cq6cs2ff1k
    @user-cq6cs2ff1k 2 роки тому +1

    Mr. Professor Mie Scattering of a single particle, is the scattered light distributed symmetrically around the incident light, that is, the scattered light is distributed exactly in a circle, do you agree with this point of view? This question has troubled me for a long time, I hope you can reply me, thank you!

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 роки тому +1

      As shown in the video, it is particle size dependent. Mie scattering is a purely mathematical theory that tries to quantify the scattering off a speherical particle.

  • @shubhamsrivastava6028
    @shubhamsrivastava6028 7 років тому +2

    u explained well sir,
    for your next video
    only suggestion to improve is: keep notice of lights on white board..things u wrote on white board is not visible clearly in videos...might be because of too much scattering....

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  7 років тому

      Good suggestion. We have been experimenting with the lighting and with the newer videos we have figured it out.

  • @mobinbahar8808
    @mobinbahar8808 3 роки тому

    bravo sir

  • @ayoublamsiah347
    @ayoublamsiah347 4 роки тому

    Bonjour monsieur,
    Comment allez vous, bon j'espère que vous êtes bien,monsieur j'ai besoin des documentaires ou bien lives de l'équation de diffusion classique et quantique avec leurs démonstrations des conditions aux limites an et bn et cn et dn? Merci d'avance.

  • @heattransfer8003
    @heattransfer8003 4 місяці тому +1

    Hello sir. Where did you take these information? Like 1/10 lambda and all numbers? Is there any article?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  4 місяці тому +2

      we can't remember what reference we used (we made that video too long ago).

  • @esh683
    @esh683 7 років тому +1

    if mie scattering is for particle size around wavelength why when we want write matlab code for wavelength 400-700 nm, we assume that particle radius is around 30-50 nm?????please answer me

  • @hardikjoshi6125
    @hardikjoshi6125 4 роки тому +2

    Hello sir,
    In video 3:00 you said in Mie scattering most of photon scattered in forward direction, and in example of car headlight @7:25 you mentioned most light reflected back because of mie sacttering.. Both statement cnflicting...

    • @enigma3264
      @enigma3264 4 роки тому +1

      Hardik Joshi yes, because the lights are from the front; if water droplets are in between you and the light sources, you received much more scattering than the light source itself. Your question helped me to digest this more. Thanks.

    • @amdadulhoque9555
      @amdadulhoque9555 3 роки тому +1

      Hi, can you please explain this more elaborately.

  • @waelfadlallah8939
    @waelfadlallah8939 Рік тому +1

    Final question sir, that is bugging me a lot!
    How does the sun produces the different wavelength of light/radiation, now i know the sun produces the EM waves through beta decay but the issue here doesn't that mean we should receive a single wavelength since it's a single process of beta decay (on a large scale) or is it that through this mechanism we get all the wavelengths possible which brings me to my last inquiry which is, do these radiation travels towards us as a single superimposed wave or as discrete waves each with its own frequency ?!!
    I hope i didn't bother and also i send the right message.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Рік тому +1

      The Sun produces its copious energy through nuclear fustion reactions fusing hydrogen into helium via the proton-proton chain reactions. The energy produced then slowly migrates from the core to the surface taking an estimated several hundred thousand years. Near the surface this energy is converted into thermal motion of the outer layers of the Sun, which then cause the Sun to rediate E&M waves via the blackbody radiation, providing a range of wavelengths being emitted.

    • @waelfadlallah8939
      @waelfadlallah8939 Рік тому +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen sir van Biezen, i can't thank you enough for answering both of my questions in a very professional and satisfying way. Bless you so so much!

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Рік тому +1

      You are welcome. 🙂

  • @joseiltonricardo
    @joseiltonricardo 2 роки тому +1

    Coloque legenda para português para que alcance mais pessoas.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 роки тому +1

      There are hundreds of different languages, so that would be a monumental task. (there is just the 2 of us). But can youtube do the translation? I believe that there is SW out there that automatically translates into any language as you listen to a video with another language.

  • @jakubkusmierczak695
    @jakubkusmierczak695 2 роки тому +1

    Mr. Professor when the temperature outside is decreasing especially in autumn, at night, we are able to see this phenomenon around the moon. Am I right? Orange halo.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 роки тому +1

      Mie scattering is particle size and photon wavelength dependent. Not so much on the temperature or time of year.

  • @_amit_kumar_946
    @_amit_kumar_946 2 роки тому +1

    Nice I'm from india

  • @TheBigBanggggg
    @TheBigBanggggg Рік тому +1

    For me a rather non-intuitive explanation: the bigger the object light is scattered off, the more light is scattered forward? My brain can't handle that.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Рік тому +1

      We simply introduced what we observe. The "why" is the greatest challenge for all concepts in physics.

    • @TheBigBanggggg
      @TheBigBanggggg Рік тому +2

      @@MichelvanBiezen I understand. But this "why" is always around the corner with me. That makes Modern Physics quite a hard topic.

  • @kalyanibrahma4057
    @kalyanibrahma4057 6 років тому +2

    please please please please please please please answer somebody, anyone , Michael!! 👇