REVIEW: BABOLAT PURE STRIKE 100 v HEAD SPEED MP 2024 | BRAND NEW RACKETS | Comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 лип 2024
  • Two brand new tennis rackets go head-to-head! The Speed MP and the Babolat Strike 100 go up against each.
    Find out which we thought was the better racket!
    00:00 - Intro
    01:50 - Specs
    02:18 - First Thoughts
    04:00 - Power
    04:28 - Spin
    05:20 - Control/Precision
    06:30 - Touch/Feel
    08:34 - Overall
    10:07 - Who Are They For?
    11:07 - Outtakes
    ==========================
    Check out our Online Courses! - www.udemy.com/course/couch-to...
    Check out our Shop! - www.ph-tennis.co.uk/collections
    ===========================
    Connect with Us!
    ===========================
    IG - / primalhealthtennis
    TikTok - / ph_tennis
    ===========================
    Want to know more about us?
    - www.ph-tennis.co.uk/pages/abo...
    ===========================
    Make sure to check out the channel to find more of our videos:
    String Tests - • Find the best tennis s...
    Racket and String Reviews - • REVIEW: TOROLINE WASAB...
    Coaching - • Video
    If this just isn't enough PHtennis and you need more, then check out our website to find anything you need! - www.ph-tennis.co.uk/
    #tennisracketreview #tennisracketreview2023 #tennisracketreviewintermediate #tennisracketreviewinhindi #tennisracketreview2024 #tabletennisracketreview #tennisbatreview #yonextennisracketreview #decathlontennisracketreview #headtennisracketreview #babolattennisracketreview #artengotennisracketreview #teloontennisracketreview #tabletennisracketreviewindia #tennisracketreviewand
  • Спорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 52

  • @raytrace2014
    @raytrace2014 5 місяців тому +16

    Should have used the same string and tension. You can't compare two different racquets properly using two different strings.

    • @dannylefevre1016
      @dannylefevre1016 5 місяців тому +3

      Yes, certainly if you look at the stifness difference between Lynx and RPM. But guys, very enjoyable video once again, well done

    • @andrehalim469
      @andrehalim469 5 місяців тому +1

      Yep shuda used a neutral string. Esp w significant RA difference and rest of spec similar.

    • @raytrace2014
      @raytrace2014 5 місяців тому

      @@andrehalim469 it's a shame as the comparison is a good idea, both racquets very similar in some respects.

  • @experientialtennis
    @experientialtennis 5 місяців тому +8

    Fantastic review once again. Really enjoying watching your reviews.
    As for Control, I do feel - and you do say that - that there has do be a discrimination between control though top-spin and control through flat hitting.
    With top-spin you find larger targets consistently and then there's the issue of how heavy your top-spin is so that the ball doesn't sit up for too long making you a sitting duck.
    With flat hitting accuracy, how consistent is the attacking hitting closer to the sidelines and down the line forehands and backhands.

  • @jorgeandrescoppiano.5715
    @jorgeandrescoppiano.5715 4 місяці тому +2

    Definitely wish the Strikes were more plush. As I have a special love for them. Babolats tend to be stiffer and with muted almost no vibrations. And Heads tend to be flexier and with a proper amount of vibration. It would be nice if next time you could also compare both rackets with the same string. Like with one that is very middle of the road. Or that you really know and like. Say Alu Power. And then also with the manufacturer’s recommended string. Because that one may complement the racket.

  • @philiplb
    @philiplb 5 місяців тому +21

    Blade 100 compared to these please.

  • @Le-Chuck
    @Le-Chuck 4 місяці тому +1

    Hi. How would you compare the new speed mp and the vcore 100 in details ? Thx 😉

  • @andrehalim469
    @andrehalim469 5 місяців тому +4

    How can 60 vs 69 RA be similar given everything else pretty much the same?

  • @lsfire3489
    @lsfire3489 4 місяці тому +6

    Pure strike 100 16 x 20 would be interesting to compare with the speed mp

  • @jamieleong9381
    @jamieleong9381 5 місяців тому +5

    Would have thought HEAD Lynx Tour would have been a more suitable string for the Speed, regular Lynx would make it feel soft

    • @AC852HK
      @AC852HK 5 місяців тому +1

      I hit with lynx tour today , very firm bite feel where it helps reduce the launch angle on the speed 🔥🔥

    • @tophersuwita
      @tophersuwita 5 днів тому

      It will increase SW though. Confidential imo is better

  • @centliguori3835
    @centliguori3835 5 місяців тому

    I have ordered the new blade 100 v9 i am getting it from TWE because of thier matching service! So my specs are 287g sw 288 and balance 320 this means i can add lead myself so its open to a little customisation. I was interested in the mp however the high sw dettered me! I would rather have a lower sw that i can adjust since its easier to do that than vice versa

  • @JLKV22
    @JLKV22 5 місяців тому +1

    Great review.
    I switched from the Graphene 360+ MP to the PSVS and it was like night and day. In my opinion, you can really feel how the MP has way more drag (especially for the one-handed backhand).
    Around the PS 100 16/20 there's a bit of hype and seems to be great.

    • @philiplb
      @philiplb 5 місяців тому +1

      Yea. I'm looking for a comparison of 100sqin 16/20 control racquets.
      Pure Strike v Gravity MP

    • @JLKV22
      @JLKV22 5 місяців тому

      @@philiplb haven't tried tho. I use the PSVS 16/20 and I have pin point accuracy, but I haven't tried the 2024. Hope they release a video about it. Tennisnerd had a video btw

  • @vipuljams
    @vipuljams 2 місяці тому +2

    I've tried Babloat PureDrive, Pure Strike and Pure Aero and various times in my tennis career and always came back with serious arm issues. I Use the Speed MP as my primary racquet now for 4 years and I have absolutely no arm issues and perfect for my game. Its got plenty of control too!

  • @arnaudpollet-thiollier6054
    @arnaudpollet-thiollier6054 Місяць тому

    Good review!

  • @arnaudpollet-thiollier6054
    @arnaudpollet-thiollier6054 5 днів тому

    What is the difference between these strings??

  • @kolev1529
    @kolev1529 3 місяці тому

    PURE STRIKE 100 16X20 GEN 4 vs HEAD RADICAL MP vs Wilson Blade it is correct to compare.

  • @abcd-fs2de
    @abcd-fs2de 5 місяців тому +4

    30 swingweight points difference sounds like a lot! There must be a big difference on how it plays. Also you really should string them with the same string at the same tension. Strings do bigger difference than racquets.

  • @TM-vg4mx
    @TM-vg4mx 3 місяці тому

    how speed mp compared to ezone 100?

  • @kimmorrison9169
    @kimmorrison9169 3 місяці тому

    I’ve seen multiple reviews of the Speed MP and if I was wanting a new racquet that would be my choice

  • @morrisperreira2758
    @morrisperreira2758 3 місяці тому

    Hey Guys. Please help me out here? I am an Intermediate player. Play around 2 - 3 times a week socially. At the age of 45, I obviously do not move as quick anymore nor is my reaction as fast as the younger guys. I play singles and doubles and I am an All rounder. My serve is average. I am looking for a comfortable all round racket with some good power and control. I did suffer some tennis elbow but that seems to be better nowadays. Your recommendations will be highly appreciated. Thanks 🙂

  • @Richibald1
    @Richibald1 2 місяці тому

    You mention Auxetic 2.0. I'm curious now, is it noticeably better than the original Auxetic from 2023? The tinny ping doesn't bother me much, but lack of control gets me rattled.

    • @ph-tennis
      @ph-tennis  2 місяці тому

      This is a good question, and one we haven’t specifically answered. I don’t think there is any difference in the material, just the amount of it and where it is placed in the frame. I will get the tech answers from Head and make a video on this! Josh

  • @soebagioatmodjo7961
    @soebagioatmodjo7961 4 місяці тому +3

    Yonex percept 100/ 100 D compared to these 🙏

  • @LarzB
    @LarzB 5 місяців тому +2

    So what is the result of the difference in rackets and what is because of the string difference?

    • @ph-tennis
      @ph-tennis  4 місяці тому

      You could argue this would/will always be a valid question. We went with the manufacturers recommended string as thought this could give the racket the chance to show how it is suppose to feel (from the brand's perspective)

    • @LarzB
      @LarzB 4 місяці тому

      @@ph-tennis most people have their own preferences on string use, regardless the brand of racket. On top of that the users that don't care generally get a preferred default string from their stringer or stay with what they always use as default. My experience is that the impact of different strings and tension on feel, spin, control and power is greater than 50% of the total experience and the racket itself less than 50%, so the test you did could say more about the strings than the racket. But worse, you actually don't know. This to me makes the test invalid. But that's my humble personal opinion.

    • @VintageSecure
      @VintageSecure 3 місяці тому

      ​@ph-tennis manufacturers recommended tensions usually are not good. Always want to string them on the lower side vs mid range

  • @RaymondChenon
    @RaymondChenon 4 місяці тому

    You should used the same string and same tension on these two rackets.

  • @santtuasp3136
    @santtuasp3136 5 місяців тому

    isn't the string pattern different on these?

    • @ph-tennis
      @ph-tennis  5 місяців тому

      Both have a 16x19 string pattern 🎾

  • @bojack3827
    @bojack3827 5 місяців тому +1

    23mm to 21mm to 23mm beam width? Er, no it doesn't.

    • @ph-tennis
      @ph-tennis  4 місяці тому

      21-23-21. A mere slip of the tongue dear Bojack3827, but apologies. The written spec details are correct 🤷‍♂️

  • @thedom3403
    @thedom3403 5 місяців тому +1

    Interesting coincidence that for both of these rackets the manufacturer decided to make the paint job look worse than the previous generation. I physically could not bring myself to use either of these rackets, even if they played flawlessly, knowing how much better the previous ones look.

    • @ph-tennis
      @ph-tennis  4 місяці тому

      Agree in part, but we don't like the way many rackets look so just have to park our disdain an play!

  • @whataniceday
    @whataniceday 3 місяці тому +2

    two different strings? this review has been completely ruined

  • @TinNguyen-tz2rf
    @TinNguyen-tz2rf 5 місяців тому

    Please, strike 16.20 string bro. Terrible review

    • @ph-tennis
      @ph-tennis  4 місяці тому +1

      This is the Strike 100. 16x19 string pattern. There is also a 16x20 version, but this is not the one we're reviewing here 🤷‍♂️

  • @btroofing6492
    @btroofing6492 5 місяців тому

    Sick of watching the reviews. You can't Review using different strings. You can't especially when the review is so close for each racket. you're doing categories of spin power the strings will make a big difference. Just do the review on the Using the strings you play with And tension

    • @ph-tennis
      @ph-tennis  4 місяці тому +1

      Appreciate the comment and sorry you feel so upset! We went with the manufacturers recommended string as thought this could give the racket the chance to show how it is suppose to feel (from the brand's perspective). Shall we give it another go?

    • @btroofing6492
      @btroofing6492 4 місяці тому +3

      @@ph-tennis The manufacturer will always recommend their own string. We need a review with the same strings on each racket to make it more accurate..

    • @lsfire3489
      @lsfire3489 4 місяці тому

      I do not agree you should compare the racquets with the best string for each. This way you are getting most out of both. Otherwise you would be bringing either one or both down in performance.

    • @scottbrady4472
      @scottbrady4472 4 місяці тому

      Great review. I have the babolat 100. Would like to try the speed.