9:06～ The front tire of the Suzuki G500, you can see that it is directional from the pattern, but it is installed backwards. I have experienced this with car tires, but this is very dangerous in wet conditions. Despite its groove pattern is designed to drain water, it functions to collect water to the center because the tire is installed backward.
started off being erroneous about the Honda 450 and yamaha tiddler and degenerated to totally non factual concerning the royal enfield and moto guzzi...really pathetic ...shame
More crappy AI narration and glaring errors. Ducati MkI 900cc? WTF the 250 was luck to get 70 MPH downhill with a following breeze. No 1960's Harley was innovative, handled well and vibrated more than a concrete leveller. Though a reat all round motorcycle the mecchanics of the Norton Commando were already totally obsolute with the isolastic frame a work aroundof the inherent vibration issuesof the traditional British parrallel twin. None of the photographs of the Guzzi V7 are of the 1971 (not 1960's) version which incidentally was a great bike even if the brakes are an absoute bastard to get working right.
I am so tired of this AI crap narration. All the hype, which all sounds the same, can't cover up the lack of knowledge and basic cluelessness. What's the point of this anyway?
9:06～ The front tire of the Suzuki G500, you can see that it is directional from the pattern, but it is installed backwards. I have experienced this with car tires, but this is very dangerous in wet conditions. Despite its groove pattern is designed to drain water, it functions to collect water to the center because the tire is installed backward.
CL350 has disc brakes you say 12:00. I don't see disc brakes. Sorry, your comment is inaccurate!!!!!!!!! RE
Picture the right Royal Enfield and the V7 Guzzi which was a touring bike
The Ducati Mach1 was a 250 cc engine, not a 900 cc (a single cylinder thumper with 900 cc thats not possible eve today....)
21st century interceptor and guzzi - run out of 1960's bikes to show?
AI sucks, at least show pics of the right bikes and pick the right bikes!
the commentator thinks this is a comedy post right??? lotsa mis information and hear say here ...pathetic
started off being erroneous about the Honda 450 and yamaha tiddler and degenerated to totally non factual concerning the royal enfield and moto guzzi...really pathetic ...shame
More crappy AI narration and glaring errors. Ducati MkI 900cc? WTF the 250 was luck to get 70 MPH downhill with a following breeze. No 1960's Harley was innovative, handled well and vibrated more than a concrete leveller. Though a reat all round motorcycle the mecchanics of the Norton Commando were already totally obsolute with the isolastic frame a work aroundof the inherent vibration issuesof the traditional British parrallel twin. None of the photographs of the Guzzi V7 are of the 1971 (not 1960's) version which incidentally was a great bike even if the brakes are an absoute bastard to get working right.
I am so tired of this AI crap narration. All the hype, which all sounds the same, can't cover up the lack of knowledge and basic cluelessness. What's the point of this anyway?