Getting Started in Celestial Navigation (Accuracy and Precision)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 83

  • @PaperAndHomemadeGuns
    @PaperAndHomemadeGuns 9 років тому +13

    I am a deck cadet , and also a maritime transportation student. These are so useful lectures for my Celestial Nav. exams. Thank you for doing these.

    • @bobleclair5665
      @bobleclair5665 Місяць тому

      Is it a requirement for captains license?

  • @laurenceholden
    @laurenceholden 5 років тому +2

    WOW! This is by far the best explanation, and so clearly step by step, that I have ever come across (and I have carefully studied, and restudied dozens of books on the subject as well as videos for 2 years now). Thank you, thank you. I go back to this series often.

  • @shelbyindianajones3226
    @shelbyindianajones3226 2 місяці тому

    Thanks for another lesson, I needed to learn those "minor" corrections and adjustments

  • @dandude02
    @dandude02 7 років тому +3

    hie Chris ...... ur vlog is very useful ....... specially for guys like me who is an aspiring second mate (merchant mariner)..............plz keep up the good work .

  • @nhojcam
    @nhojcam 11 років тому +1

    just got my sextant today. astra IIIB. it's used, but it looks like its never even been on a boat. index error is almost nil. can't wait to use it! thank you for your videos. they are very helpful to a relative newbie like me.

  • @danielwalker5682
    @danielwalker5682 Рік тому +1

    Outstanding clarity and brevity. Thank-you.

  • @SVAdAstra
    @SVAdAstra 8 років тому

    Thanks for a clear and concise course! I just followed your noon site instructions with a cheap plastic sextant and got within 3.1 nm of my true position on the first try! Well done!!

    • @chrisnolan825
      @chrisnolan825 8 років тому

      +SVAdAstra Great job, shipmate! Glad to hear it came out so well!

  • @mellowmood20
    @mellowmood20 10 років тому +2

    Hey Chris, I Just wanted to say thank you for creating this video series. I am a novice at celestial navigation, but am going on a sailing trip to the Bahamas soon and I hope to be able to apply some of the things you have taught.

    • @NavigationTraining
      @NavigationTraining  10 років тому +1

      Awesome, enjoy the Bahamas. Check out Big Majors Spot in the Exumas if you can...they have swimming pigs that eat your dinner scraps - so fun!

    • @kennethhawthorn6618
      @kennethhawthorn6618 6 років тому

      mellowmood20 gr

  • @chrish6412
    @chrish6412 4 роки тому +2

    So I tried taking readings earlier this month using a training sextant. I was shooting from deck 9 or 10 depending on the direction of sail (North or south). Talking to the ship's Chief Engineer I was able to learn that the bridge (deck 8) was 30m above the water and deck 10 was 40m. Adding my eye's height (approimatly 5 ft) I came up with a Height of eye of approximately 116 - 137 ft above the water. Not finding those values in my version of the Almanac, I found the equation DIP = 0.97 * square root of Height above water. Using the SD for the sun, not the correction, I was still within 6 minutes of latitude every time (except day one in which I forgot to subtract it from 90 degrees and plotted us off the coast of Nova Scotia (after a days sail south of Miami.)

  • @NavigationTraining
    @NavigationTraining  11 років тому +1

    Great - thanks for watching! Good luck in your studies!

    • @arunkrishnans489
      @arunkrishnans489 4 роки тому

      Sir, what is the purpose of finding geographic position of sun?

  • @mgevirtz
    @mgevirtz 4 роки тому +1

    Best episode yet!

  • @knightnvy
    @knightnvy 11 років тому +1

    Really enjoy the videos. I think you called every correction in degrees rather than in min

  • @NavigationTraining
    @NavigationTraining  11 років тому +1

    Awesome, congratulations! Happy navigating!

  • @NavigationTraining
    @NavigationTraining  11 років тому +3

    Good catch, thanks! I'll pay more attention to that in the next series :)

  • @karhukivi
    @karhukivi 4 роки тому +2

    Not sure it's a good idea to start a course on celestial navigation with the sextant. Many people think that when you look through the sextant then - hey presto! - you know your position. Better to start with the notion of a position line or circle by looking up at a lighthouse whose height is known, and then working out the distance to it. Next, the "ground position" of a star or planet. Then the spherical triangle and the calculations in summary and finally the sextant altitude or angle. The precision and corrections can then be added once the basics have been grasped.

    • @NavigationTraining
      @NavigationTraining  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks for your opinions, totally a valid way to go! When I teach in the classroom, that's very similar to how I organize it. When I teach underway, especially with college kids, my order of operations (just like the series) is sextant, noon site (an easy win), how to make the noon site better (IC, DIP, Alt), and then give the theory - where most of them fall asleep haha. Thanks for your time and have a good day, sail safe!

    • @karhukivi
      @karhukivi 4 роки тому +2

      @@NavigationTraining Good to hear from you! I have shown kids a clinometer (good to only one degree) and a sighting compass and we do a very rough sunshot roundabout noon. They are astonished at how good a position that can give. Then I focus on those who showed real interest and we try doing the calculations for an angle and bearing of a planet to identify which one it is from the almanac. If they get that far, I then introduce the sextant.
      As I'm land-based, this part has to be done with a so-called artificial horizon, a bowl of cooking oil! Don't sail anymore but want to show how astro works and a purpose to maths and geometry. Stay safe!

  • @CletusLeonardLee
    @CletusLeonardLee 10 років тому +8

    At 3:27 minutes into the Precision video, you state that the index error is 2 degrees, when what you meant was 2 minutes.

  • @jeanfrancis9892
    @jeanfrancis9892 8 років тому +2

    Congrats ,Iam watching your videos in Brasil to review my capitan course,as far I ve meet others videos your are very nice....

  • @romankogalin7048
    @romankogalin7048 9 років тому +5

    fantastic learning here nice job you doing

  • @donjvalley
    @donjvalley 7 років тому +1

    Excellent series!!! I'm retired, very new to sailing and need to learn this skill as autopilots always break, eventually...I didn't understand whether you ADD or SUBTRACT the MAIN CORRECTION --- please clarify for me....

    • @NavigationTraining
      @NavigationTraining  7 років тому +1

      Hi Don, the main correction would be added for lower limb observations and subtracted for upper limb observations. So if you bring the sun to the horizon like in the video, with the lower limb on the horizon, you would always add the main correction. The main correction accounts for semi-diameter of the sun (the thickness from the lower limb to the center) and for atmospheric refraction. Good luck!

  • @gulfonetwo
    @gulfonetwo 11 років тому +3

    PS digging the hot rod look on that Astra 3

  • @dinos8557
    @dinos8557 8 років тому +2

    Chris, thank you for posting these videos. I have no need for these calculations but watched them because I enjoy learning new things. I assume the long (GHA). calculation starting at 7:28 in your video is also taken at the noon shot, the sun directly at the apex of its observed arc? This would have the sun on your longitude, knowing GMT the almanac provides position and local time has no bearing on these calculations.

  • @sailingketchstarship1965
    @sailingketchstarship1965 4 роки тому +2

    You're a BOSS.

  • @stufirewalker
    @stufirewalker 3 роки тому

    Hello Chris, brilliant series, thank you. Just wish the UK had beautiful sailing waters like where you shot the videos. I've come across a typo error at around 6 minutes 15secs into the video. You were describing the d number correction for 50 minutes, which came to +.8'. There's a screen shot showing the corrected declination of 18 29.4, should be 08 29.4
    Regards Stu

    • @NavigationTraining
      @NavigationTraining  3 роки тому

      Thanks Stu, I hope to replace this series with a more modern one soon!

  • @powervoices
    @powervoices 2 роки тому +1

    This is awesome

  • @JC-yb3zb
    @JC-yb3zb 9 років тому +2

    I stumbled onto your video series by chance. I don't know anything about celestial navigation but it seems very interesting. I'm curious, it seems your sextant isn't secured (tethered) in any way, so how do keep from losing it overboard?

    • @NavigationTraining
      @NavigationTraining  9 років тому +5

      +Jeff C Hi Jeff- thanks for bringing that up, it is always a good idea to secure your sextant with a wrist strap or neck harness if possible when underway. So far I've been lucky! But you are right I should use a tether. Thanks!

  • @gulfonetwo
    @gulfonetwo 11 років тому +1

    What is your opinion on mechanically adjusting out the index error via the mirrors screws?

    • @NavigationTraining
      @NavigationTraining  11 років тому

      Hey Nicholas - I thought I had responded to this, sorry if not…In general as long as the index error is fairly low (less than 5 minutes), I tend to leave it in the sextant…it becomes a known error that I can account for. I have another (old, non-flamed) sextant with a larger error that I do correct from time to time, but every time I do it kind of freaks me out a bit to be messing with it, don't want to strip the screws etc etc. So if I can avoid it I do! Thanks again, take it easy,

  • @SubwaySailorSailing
    @SubwaySailorSailing 10 років тому +2

    How do you know what time zone you are in if you are at sea?

    • @chrisnolan825
      @chrisnolan825 10 років тому +1

      Good question - with 24 hours in the day and 24 time zones, and 360 degrees in a circle, each time zone is 15 degrees wide. So technically you would adjust your clocks as you move from zone to zone - however you can set the clock to anything convenient. For instance on some of my journeys we only adjust the clock at the beginning or end of the trip to avoid confusion on watches. So you just need to be aware of what time zone you are "observing." Standard meridians are located every 15 degrees outward from Greenwich. Hope that helps!

  • @nfaaudio8412
    @nfaaudio8412 2 роки тому

    This is so well explained. Just made it click!

  • @lousek1992
    @lousek1992 7 років тому

    Many thanks for your awesome videos!
    Just two questions regarding DIP:
    1. As far as I know, there are different sea levels e.g. in the pacific, atlantic or the mediterranean sea - how is this reflected in the nautical almanach?
    2. What DIP do you use when using an artificial horizon at e.g. 500 metres above sea level (e.g. when in Switzerland)?

  • @roslar1572
    @roslar1572 8 років тому

    great info. I had to watch them few times.
    thx for posting it them.

  • @paulmchugh5924
    @paulmchugh5924 3 роки тому

    Great as easy to follow as the Polaris Star considerate educative style leads the lost souls like me in the corrected direction

  • @sterlingtenor
    @sterlingtenor 8 років тому

    Chris, I have been trying to learn celestial navigation for many years and your videos have finally made it easier to understand. I have been doing noon sights for latitude at my house on a lake. For three days straight, I keep getting a latitude that is 10 miles south of my actual location. I am wondering why, and suspect that it may be that my lake has a fetch of 4 miles to the horizon. Would this explain my error?

    • @NavigationTraining
      @NavigationTraining  8 років тому

      +Sterling Williamson You bet! Two things: one is that your lake probably isn't at sea level, and two, as you say, the distance to the horizon is too short. The formula for distance to the horizon is 1.17 times the square root of your height above the surface. If you get a chance to practice at the ocean, I bet your results come out just fine....seems like you have the technique down pat!

  • @Shellback1998
    @Shellback1998 5 років тому

    Confused about where you are getting the declaration, the date you have in your example is 4/10/1981, for that time I’m reading n8 deg 06.6, but I believe you grabbed the 11th day data. Would that be correct?

  • @MrAgentblues
    @MrAgentblues 10 років тому +1

    Question? at Ex. # 1 the given date is april 10, 1981. but in your video at 5:17 you underlined the 11th day of gmt 1850h, declination of N 8 degrees and 28.7 minutes, i'm confused when i look at my own almanac at april 10 friday, 1981 at 1800 GMT and says N8 degrees and 06.6 minutes?

    • @NavigationTraining
      @NavigationTraining  10 років тому

      Ok - thanks for letting me know…I bet I accidentally used the 2013 nautical almanac instead of the 1981. My mistake! Hopefully the process still made sense. Thanks again, good luck!

    • @MrAgentblues
      @MrAgentblues 10 років тому

      of course it does. it really helps me to review all celestial stuff i study before and I do understand the concept for what am i doing. maraming salamat po! hehe

    • @NavigationTraining
      @NavigationTraining  10 років тому

      Awesome - good luck! Ligtas sa paglalakbay (I think that's right :)

  • @jsytac
    @jsytac 9 років тому

    Should height of tide be calculated/considered when establishing Dip? How would you work this height out mid-ocean? Also, when the sextant angle is very near 90deg, how do you know if you are N or S of the sun?

    • @NavigationTraining
      @NavigationTraining  9 років тому

      +Mc Egavas Hi - thanks for your questions. It isn't necessary to adjust for tides on the open ocean. Celestial navigation is used in open ocean environments where accuracy to 3nm is sufficient. As far as the sun being north or south of you - this is a good question and shows you understand the fundamentals. Unfortunately when the sun is nearly overhead, it is exceptionally difficult to measure - that is one of the problems of living in the tropics! Using your dead-reckoning latitude, compared to the declination of the sun for the day in question, you should be able to determine whether you are north or south of the sun. If it is so close you can't tell for sure, the sun will be so high in the sky that a measurement will be nearly impossible. Thanks for your questions good luck!
      Chris

    • @Ktrpilot
      @Ktrpilot 9 років тому

      You Don't have to worry about height of tide when you are at sea and taking a sight, there will be some fluctuation in your height of eye anyway, especially if you are in a small boat or yacht due to the sea and swell and the rise and fall it's extremely rare that you would have no sea or swell to contend with shooting a sight even in the tropics. If you are getting positions within 2 NM accuracy it's more than good enough. With altitudes of close to 90 degrees your latitude at noon would be very close to the value of declination of the sun. If it was so close that you couldn't tell if you were north or south then it could be given that your latitude would be equal to the declination. Hope this helps.

    • @shipoperations8292
      @shipoperations8292 8 років тому +1

      +Mc Egavas height of tide won't matter if you are floating. If you were on a fixed dock, yes, it would change the dip, but you'd already know where you were! The only time your sextant angle will be near 90 is when you are near the suns GP (it happened to me once) otherwise you can tell by the shadow pin on your compass.

  • @renzzamora8472
    @renzzamora8472 10 років тому

    i have a problem, ive got 17*12.9 altitude at 1725H, whats next? because if i subtracted 90* to it to get the ZD it will be more complicated, my lat now is 28*24.8, and i dont know next, im confuse, and another how will i know if i was above the body, what i meant is the maximum dec of the sun was 23* and i was on the 43* lat without knowing, please help

    • @NavigationTraining
      @NavigationTraining  10 років тому

      Dante D Hi Dante - if I am reading it right I think you are shooting the angle of the sun in the early evening...for this type of problem you need to measure the sun at local noon - when it is at its highest point in the sky, and when it is due south or north of you.
      It sounds like you live at about latitude 28 degrees and I will assume that is in the northern hemisphere. Right now the sun is about 18 degrees north in declination. So if you measured the sun tomorrow at it's highest point in the sky, it should be approximately 80 degrees high. So you would use 90 minus 80 to get a zenith distance of 10 degrees. Then, declination (18) plus zenith distance (10) equals latitude.
      As far as your question about north or south of you: If you live at 28 degrees north the sun will always be to your south, so you can practice at home knowing that is true. When you travel, you would need to have an idea of where on earth you are (a dead-reckoning position), then you would be able to tell easily, with very few exceptions, whether you are north or south of the sun.
      I hope that helps, if you would like to talk more you can email me at navigation.training.videos(at)gmail.com and maybe we can do a few more examples for your home!
      Good luck, - Chris

    • @renzzamora8472
      @renzzamora8472 10 років тому

      thank you for your answer and all of your videos, it really helps me a lot, i don't really have an idea on celestial nav. but because of your videos i understand the basics and the other important parts that i need to know.

  • @MrLotengo
    @MrLotengo 10 років тому

    Chris, I could not tell from the video but is Dip constant for a given height of eye regardless of time or geographic location? If so, would it be possible to calibrate your sextant for that amount of Dip and have the index error cancel out the height of eye error? (assuming you take your readings with roughly the same height of eye each time)

    • @NavigationTraining
      @NavigationTraining  10 років тому

      Hello sir, given your assumptions, I would say for your typical sighting from the same position on the boat you are fairly safe in assuming the same dip each time: dip does not vary with location or atmospherics. However index error can change (e.g. hot day swells the metal of the sextant), so it would not be safe to assume that IC and dip could be set to cancel each other out. For academic problems and to be strictly correct, you should refer to the dip table each time or you can also calculate the dip directly if you don't want to use the tables...Dip (minutes) = -1.76√Height of Eye (meters). Thanks for asking, great question!

  • @MrGotropic
    @MrGotropic 8 років тому +4

    Declination, Interpolate, GHA, LHA...... I'm in Heaven, .....

  • @MrGotropic
    @MrGotropic 8 років тому +1

    I love Norries Tables, do you love Norries Tables ? do they still make Norries Tables ?

  • @thracian
    @thracian 3 роки тому +1

    1:57 sunset getting green :p

  • @daveocutter
    @daveocutter 10 років тому

    Example 1, you added the ZN and Dec wrong. You put 17* 43.5' N. Its 17* 42.7' N

    • @NavigationTraining
      @NavigationTraining  10 років тому

      Thanks for checking the math. Hopefully the process still made sense for you, my mistake! Thanks again and good luck!

    • @daveocutter
      @daveocutter 10 років тому

      I watched all of your videos. I ordered my sextant and a copy of the Nautical Almanac. I cannot wait to try it out.

    • @toonamimaki285
      @toonamimaki285 5 років тому

      Wow, this is the comment I was looking for and it was 5 years ago.

  • @Hallicj
    @Hallicj 10 років тому

    David Barrie #author 'enthralling' #book #Sextant The Halli Casser-Jayne show 5/28 3 pm ET #sailing #invention
    bit.ly/U4EEMd

  • @Stellaferox
    @Stellaferox 2 роки тому

    @4:33 min I think you are looking at april 11th and not april 10th

  • @donjvalley
    @donjvalley 7 років тому

    I answered it myself, all I had to do was take another look at the math steps and see that Main Correction is added....Just old and slow....

  • @MrGotropic
    @MrGotropic 8 років тому +6

    Wow, guys your age would just be getting high and drinking and following their Waypoint on their GPS, not you, your doing it old school

  • @mrjp1819
    @mrjp1819 6 років тому

    This time you speak everything too fast ... If you do not know the almanac (like me) you do not understand what you are trying to explain at such a speed. You do not even see and understand what you are writing on the parpir. !

  • @stephenwilliams6294
    @stephenwilliams6294 Рік тому +1

    When you find out that these angel calculation only works on a flat earth, give me a thumbs up

    • @marcg1686
      @marcg1686 Рік тому

      Oh look, a mindless flattard smearing himself across the comments section of a video about celestial navigation.

    • @karhukivi
      @karhukivi Рік тому +2

      All the calculations are based on astronomical observations which imply a rotating planet. They use spherical geometry, not plane geometry.

    • @shelbyindianajones3226
      @shelbyindianajones3226 2 місяці тому

      to get bearing you need trig with sines and cosines and that immediately disproves a flat earth.